SO7 installation problem patch 5

Hello,
I try to apply the patch so-7-pp5-bin-linux.bin on a serverinstallation, but the installation fail. (OS : suse 9.2 glibc 2.3.3)
I do:
./so-7-pp5-bin-linux.bin -patch [path to network installation] --> I see a message in a window for a very short time, to short for reading. No other error message. If I start SO7 I can��t see any patch information.
Next I do:
./so-7-pp5-bin-linux.bin -patch [path to network installation] -v -debug --> A window pop up with "INSTALL_INFO flag is missing ExitCode 9".
What does it mean?
BeforeI have patch no. 4 installed with no problem. On my second computer with Debian OS I have no problem to install patch no. 5
Next I do: Remove SO7 competely and install again. The same problem, but now I can��t install an earlier patch again too.
I removed an unused earlier installation of OpenOffie also and install SO7 completly again. Nothing. I can��t install any patch
What can I do?
Regards
Udo

This will probably not be much help; SO7 was unstable when installed on a system with glibc 2.3.1 (Libranet 2.8 Debian). The applications would start but would shut down after a few keystrokes. When patch #5 arrived, I installed it and noted that the instability problem was gone.
I am now wondering if the compiler used for the patch 5, which now apparently has backward compatibility with an older glibc version may be incompatible with the version used in SuSE.
NB I have reported separately another strange incompatibility with SO8 and KDE 3.2.x. SO8 segfaults under KDE but runs perfectly under other windows managers on the same system. I have reported this to Sun/SO and am awaiting a response.

Similar Messages

Installation problems on Solaris 9

I am having issues installing the base software and can't seen to figure
out how get past this. The error message from the installation log is as
follows:
Accept terms of Software License Agreement? [R] y
pwd: cannot determine current directory!
/tmp/installwnaWXF/checkinstallynaWXF: no home directory
Error during installation. Setup will now exit.
Please correct any errors described in /tmp/tta_inst.log, and then try
again.
Cleaning up temporary files...
# cat /tmp/tta_inst.log
**snip**
Processing package instance <tta> from </tmp/ttainst_1/ttapkg.15978/pkg>
Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise Edition for SPARC Solaris 2.8+
(SPARC) 4.10.903
Tarantella, Inc.
pkgadd: ERROR: request script did not complete successfully
Installation of <tta> failed.
No changes were made to the system.
Script detail for package <tta>
---> checkinstallynaWXF
Any help from here would be appreciated.
gavin

from the diagnostic details:
Architecture           spso0509
Host           SunOS e220r 5.9 Generic_117171-17 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-60
Package           Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise Edition for
SPARC Solaris 2.8+ (4.10.903)
Package           Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise Edition Andrew
Fonts (4.10.903)
Package           Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise Edition Hangul
Fonts (4.10.903)
Package           Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise Edition Platform
Identity Pack for SPARC Solaris 2.8+ (4.10.903)
Package           Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise Edition Security
Pack for SPARC Solaris 2.8+ (4.10.903)
Package           Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise Edition Windows
Connectivity Pack for SPARC Solaris 2.8+ (4.10.903)
Bill Weir wrote:
Gavin,
Glad you're sorted. Can you confirm that it is 4.10.903 you are using
(not 4.00.903)? I'm concerned if this installation problem is still
present in the later version.
Bill
Gavin Westermann wrote on 31/08/2005 05:00:
Bill - that seems to have done the trick! the installation is now running.
Thanks so much for this.I am running a pair of Sun Ray 170's on my desk
here at home mated to an E220R. I am hoping to use Tarantella to be able
to access and run apps on a win3k server in the same rack.
Gavin
Bill Weir wrote:
Gavin,
This looks like a known problem with TTA 4.00.903 and some Solaris
patches which were distributed at about the same time. However, you say
you're using 4.10.903, and as far as I know the problem should be fixed
in that version.
You could try the workaround described in
http://www.tarantella.com/documentation/sgd/ee/4.0/install.html - search
for "tta_pkgadd" on that page and follow the instructions given there.
Regards,
Bill Weir, Sun Microsystems Inc.
Gavin Westermann wrote on 30/08/2005 05:06:
I am having issues installing the base software and can't seen to figure
out how get past this. The error message from the installation log is as
follows:
Accept terms of Software License Agreement? [R] y
pwd: cannot determine current directory!
/tmp/installwnaWXF/checkinstallynaWXF: no home directory
Error during installation. Setup will now exit.
Please correct any errors described in /tmp/tta_inst.log, and then try
again.
Cleaning up temporary files...
# cat /tmp/tta_inst.log
**snip**
Processing package instance <tta> from </tmp>
Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise Edition for SPARC Solaris 2.8+
(SPARC) 4.10.903
Tarantella, Inc.
pkgadd: ERROR: request script did not complete successfully
Installation of <tta> failed.
No changes were made to the system.
Script detail for package <tta>
---> checkinstallynaWXF
Any help from here would be appreciated.
gavin

Oracle 8.0.5 Post Installation Problem

Hi all,
I have installed Oracle 8.0.5.1 is installed on my RH 6.0 box.
However, I am running into a couple of post-installation
problems.
1. root.sh (sucessfully ran).
2. glibc patch (successfuly ran). There were a few errors on the
screen with the "mv" commands (file does not exist). Is tha
alright?
3. catrep.sql (problem). This is where I have a problem.
I ran dbstart as oracle805 (installation account), but I have no
idea whether or not I really started the database. ps -aux did
not yield any clue.
I also tried svrmgrl and "startup", but the file "initXXX.ora"
did not exist, so I copied the existing "init.ora" to
"initXXX.ora". XXX is my ORACLE_SID. Instead alert_XXX.log gave
me the following:
ORA-00202: controlfile: 'ora_control1'
ORA-27037: unable to obtain file status
So, in other words, I have no idea whether or not I have
successfully installed Oracle. All insights are greatly
appreciated.
Thanks a bunch...
Anh
null

Phan Anh Tran (guest) wrote:
: Hi all,
: I have installed Oracle 8.0.5.1 is installed on my RH 6.0 box.
: However, I am running into a couple of post-installation
: problems.
: 1. root.sh (sucessfully ran).
: 2. glibc patch (successfuly ran). There were a few errors on
the
: screen with the "mv" commands (file does not exist). Is tha
: alright?
: 3. catrep.sql (problem). This is where I have a problem.
: I ran dbstart as oracle805 (installation account), but I have
no
: idea whether or not I really started the database. ps -aux did
: not yield any clue.
: I also tried svrmgrl and "startup", but the file "initXXX.ora"
: did not exist, so I copied the existing "init.ora" to
: "initXXX.ora". XXX is my ORACLE_SID. Instead alert_XXX.log
gave
: me the following:
: ORA-00202: controlfile: 'ora_control1'
: ORA-27037: unable to obtain file status
: So, in other words, I have no idea whether or not I have
: successfully installed Oracle. All insights are greatly
: appreciated.
: Thanks a bunch...
: Anh
Hei !
I also did this fault :-( See this webpage - it's excellent
and describes everything.
http://jordan.fortwayne.com/oracle/rh6x.html
null

Installation problems in MSCS ORACLE 10.2 ECC 6.00

I am writing to report some unexpected installation problems. I am installing SAP ECC 6.00 in a MSCS cluster environment (Windows 2003 / Oracle 10.2) in our production environment and I am having problems during the installing the central instance phase. The sapinst_dev shows the following error: CJS-30102 Checking the database for installation type failed, Also the jsourcecheck.log shows the following error: com. sap. engine. frame. core. configuration. Configuration Exception: Error while connecting to DB and java. sql. SQLException: Excepción de E/S: The Network Adapter could not establish the connection     at oracle. jdbc.driver. DatabaseError. throwSqlException (DatabaseError.java:112)
The database is currently running without any problem and all the services (SAP and Oracle) as well.
Following the installation guide, I performed the almost all the steps successfully:
     Oracle RDBMS, patches and Oracle fail safe software on both nodes (successfully)
     Install the central services instance for ABAP (ASCS) on the first MSCS node (successfully)
     Install the central services instance (SCS) on the first MSCS node (successfully)
     Cluster the first MSCS node (successfully)
     Install the database instance on the first MSCS node (successfully)
     Cluster the additional MSCS node (successfully)
     Install an enqueue replication server(successfully)
     Perform additional steps for the Oracle Fail Safe configuration (successfully)
     Create the Oracle Fail Safe group (successfully)
     Set up as shared database directory in your Oracle Home (successfully)
     Add the Oracle database resource to the Fail Safe group (successfully)
     install the central instance (Failed)
     install at least one dialog instance (not installed yet)
As you can observe, I have performed the create oracle fail safe group activity first and then the install the central instance later. Reading the sap note 967121 today, I just realized that there is a wrong installation sequence; the sap note 967121 (actualized date: 17/OCT/07 ) says that you must install the central instance before you create the Oracle Fail Safe group. Is this sequence compulsory? Or can I continue the installation process?
If this sequence is compulsory do I have to reinstall all the predecessor activities or should I undo just the create oracle fail safe group activity?
Please let me know if the error which is showed in the installation of the central instance phase is because the wrong sequence or it is due to another reason.
Our cluster configuration is:
4 network card
Public network cards:
Ip:192.168.2.240 (hostname: ccaribe3rp1, Node A)
Ip: 192.168.2.241 (hostname: ccariber3p2, node B)
Private network cards:
Ip: 10.10.10.1 (hostname: ccaribe3rp1.ceramicascaribe.com, node A
Ip: 10.10.10.2 (hostname: ccaribe3rp2.ceramicascaribe.com, node B
Clustergroup:
Cluster group name: SAPPRO
Cluster group Virtual IP: 192.168.2.239, network name: SAPPRO (subnet mask 255.255.255.0)
SAP cluster group:
Sap clustergroup virtual IP: 192.168.2.238, network name: sapgrp (subnet mask 255.255.255.0)
Database cluster group:
Database cluster group virtual Ip: 192.168.2.237, network name: dbgrp (subnet mask: 255.255.255.0)
We have performed the mapping of the host names to the IP addresses on the windows host file already.
I would be very grateful if someone kindly can help me to solve this problem.
Best Regards
Boris Romero

Hello Boris,
one of the main problems is that step
"Create the Oracle Fail Safe group (successfully)"
cannot be successful because you need to run configtool and change the secure store as described in installation guide. At this stage the configtool does not exists (documentation error for ECC6.0 guide), so the correct sequence is to install CI and cluster the DB, but not vice versa.
Which stage is the sapinst braking up?
Is this beginning, middle or end of installation?
Did you try to run configtool and modify secure store?
best regards

Adobe Reader XI Installation Problem

I just performed a fresh reload of Windows XP SP3 on one of my computers. After downloading and running the installer for Adobe Reader XI I get the following error pop up:
Internet Explorer Script Error
An Error has occurred in the script on this page.
Line:     1
Char:    10570
Error:    'ActionLaunchReader' is undefined.
Code:    0
URL:     http://127.0.0.1:2469/app/_js/adobe.js
Again I am running Windows XP SP3 with all the patches applied, JRE 7u10 (set as the default for both IE and Firefox), and scripting is enabled in Internet Explorer. I get the exact same error when trying to install the latest version of Adobe Flash Player as well, however, Adobe Shockwave installed just fine.
I am new to this forum, so forgive me if this problem has been posted before. I did not find anything similar in a search. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Message was edited by: fd2849 Corrected spelling errors.

Yes: http://helpx.adobe.com/content/help/en/flash-player/kb/installation-problems-flash-player- windows.html#main-pars_header

Live! SB022x (or any OEM model) owners with driver installation problems ... [Help 'maybe' he

Hi
Problems to get 'drivers'/'driver updates' installed for your Li've! or other SB models on XP or W2k system?
If ctzapxx.exe method didn't work either for you, have you tried 'forced' driver installation yet? If not here is what you can do.
NOTE: THIS METHOD DOES NOT WORK W/ ALL DRIVER PACKAGES, BECAUSE OF THE USED INSTALLER IS NOT THE SAME (ctcomp.dat is not available on those)
. download [url="http://members.aol.com/dvdking200/Pub/ctcomp.exe">this utility[/url]
2. download driver package (or installation ISO/rip) you want to install and extract it to your HD (you can also install Audigy X drivers for your Li've! card if you like)
3. run ctcomp.exe and point it to look from
- ..\Audio\Setup -folder, found as a subfolder in folder you extracted the ISO/rip
- 'main folder' (for. ex. AUD_EAX4DRV_0303) when you're installing driver update (data.cab must exist on that folder)
4. press Patch button
5. install your drivers by running setup.exe located
- at same ..\Audio\Setup -folder when setting up from extracted ISO
- at 'main' folder when you're installing driver update
.jtp
ADDON: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I tested what ctcomp.exe makes to this installation package and here are the results.
INSTALLATION PACKAGE patched: Li'veDrvUni-Pack(ENG)
SUPPORTED CARDS by installer
BEFORE CTCOMP
;SBLi've!
;For CT4670, CT4620, M002/M003, CT4780, CT40, CT4830, CT4832, CT4870, CT4872, CT483, CT487, CT4760, CT4850
[Hardware.Map3]
ID = 00000020, 0000002, 0000002F, 0080022, 0080025, 0080026, 0080027, 0080028, 0080029, 008003, 0080032, 0080040, 0080050
ProductName = Sound Blaster Li've!
;SBLi've! 5.
;For SB0060, SB000, SB002, SB00, SB003, SB005, SB022, SB0222
[Hardware.Map5]
ID = 008006, 0080062, 0080064, 0080069, 008006A, 008006B, 008006C, 0080065
ProductName = Sound Blaster Li've!
AFTER CTCOMP listed only Li've! and older series cards
;SBLi've! 5. : For SB0060, SB000, SB002, SB00, SB003, SB005, SB022, SB0222, SB0228, SB0226, SB0223, SB0229
[Hardware.Map4]
ID = 008006, 0080062, 0080064, 0080069, 008006A, 008006B, 008006C, 0080065, 0080066, 0080067, 00000, 000000A
ProductName = Sound Blaster Li've!
;SBLi've! : For CT4670, CT4620, M002/M003, CT4780, CT40, CT4830, CT4832, CT4870, CT4872, CT483, CT487, CT4760, CT4850
[Hardware.Map4]
ID = 00000020, 0000002, 0000002F, 0080022, 0080025, 0080026, 0080027, 0080028, 0080029, 008003, 0080032, 0080040, 0080050
ProductName = Sound Blaster Li've!
;For SBPCI 52 : CT4790, CT4820, SB050
[Hardware.Map4]
ID = 0080023, 0080050, 008007
ProductName = Sound Blaster PCI52
;For SBPCI 256 : CT4890, CT489, CT4893
[Hardware.Map4]
ID = 008002A, 008002B, 0080033
ProductName = Sound Blaster PCI256
= No SB0220 support available? SO, IS THERE exactly a model numbered as SB0220 AT ALL?
I think there is not.
.jtpMessage Edited by jutapa on 07-04-2006 08:6 AM

The reason i said this should be a sticky is that these boards move so fast that its impossiable for new comers to keep up with threads that have AWESOME tips that may or may not help but how many of us have accually gone through every post in the last 60 days to try and find a fix? I know I have not, but in the end you need to try everything you can.
Something like this is not on the Creative FAQ data base so the only people to know about this possiable fix are the few who catch it in time.
In my experience there is ALWAYS more than way to do things and 0 ways to get it to work with 20 other methods to run it. Thats a lot of ways to do the one thing. So unless we have a huge data base with every possiable fix,method or forceiable way to do something then more and more people will get really upset that Creative offer no help.
Take the way Creative say to un-install drivers, man, this for the most part never works, so something like this may be the only way to get it to work for some people.
What I do is though, I copy a thread like this one and will pass it on to others if need be. Ofcause with all credit to the original poster and I never pass it off as my fix and/work.
I I like to cover every possiable aspect to do something. Ya know what i mean

Oraview.vrf(0) is missing -- installation problem

Hello:
I had a problem when I was trying to install Oracle 8.0.5 on my
RedHat 6.0 machine. Please help me if you happen to know the
solution. It seemed that everything was OK at the first stage of
my installation. After I set the environment variables, I ran the
orainst to install new product without creating database. After I
got the success result, I ran the "glibcpatch" script. I also got
the message saying "Applied glibc patch for Oracle 8.0.5.
successfully." Well, after I ran the orainst again to try to
create database objects, I got the problem. In the install
screen, I select "Oracle 8 Standard RDBMS 8.0.5.0.0". After the
installation ran for a while, I got this message:
Oraview.vrf(0): FILE_NOT_FOUND while verifying oraview.
(No such file or directory.)
I tried several times to install again from the very beginning.
But each time it stopped there. I got the same results. Did
anybody out there have the same problem before? If you know how
to solve this problems, please help me. Your help is greatly
appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Warren
null

Phan Anh Tran (guest) wrote:
: Hi all,
: I have installed Oracle 8.0.5.1 is installed on my RH 6.0 box.
: However, I am running into a couple of post-installation
: problems.
: 1. root.sh (sucessfully ran).
: 2. glibc patch (successfuly ran). There were a few errors on
the
: screen with the "mv" commands (file does not exist). Is tha
: alright?
: 3. catrep.sql (problem). This is where I have a problem.
: I ran dbstart as oracle805 (installation account), but I have
no
: idea whether or not I really started the database. ps -aux did
: not yield any clue.
: I also tried svrmgrl and "startup", but the file "initXXX.ora"
: did not exist, so I copied the existing "init.ora" to
: "initXXX.ora". XXX is my ORACLE_SID. Instead alert_XXX.log
gave
: me the following:
: ORA-00202: controlfile: 'ora_control1'
: ORA-27037: unable to obtain file status
: So, in other words, I have no idea whether or not I have
: successfully installed Oracle. All insights are greatly
: appreciated.
: Thanks a bunch...
: Anh
Hei !
I also did this fault :-( See this webpage - it's excellent
and describes everything.
http://jordan.fortwayne.com/oracle/rh6x.html
null

Sun, take responsibility for appserver7 installation problems!

*** First set of problems...
I'm having installation problems on both Solaris 8, (Ultra 480, 1GB RAM, latest recommended patches) and a Windows 2000 Server with SP2 (1GHz P4, 512MB RAM).
I chose default installation directory and then the install
complains that Pointbase 4.2 should be installed into the
same directory etc. Cannot unselect the Sample apps and
Pointbase options.
*** Second problem...
I have an instance previously installed on Windows 2000
Professional with SP2.(1GHz PIII, 512MB RAM, 5GB space)
When i start application server 7.0 , then i get the following
message:
Could not start the instance: domain1:admin-server
Server failed to start:abnormal subprocess termination
Could not start the instance: domain1:server1
Server failed to start: abnormal subprocess termination
Could not start one or more instances in the domain:domain1
Could not start one or more domains
Press any key to continue ...

When you say that you choose the default installation directory and then the installer complained about Pointbase, what platform where you using? Had you already attempted installs in the past or uninstallations that did not complete properly?
For your second issue, did you happen to change the host name of your machine? Try cranking up the log level (edit server.xml) to see what's causing the instances to fail on startup. Did the application ever start up after install? What things did you do just prior to the server exhibiting this behaviour?

Problems patching VirtualBox s10x_u8 BE

Hi,
I'm having problems patching a VirtualBox Solaris 10 x86 environment with the latest patch cluster from December.
I've unloaded the zip file in /var/tmp and attempted to apply-prereq to the current BE prior to the ABE. This fails during the checkinstall process for 119255-71 (patching of patchadd etc). These are the first patches applied to this s10x_u8 install - the only additional pkg is SUNWvboxguest.
It reports:
/var/tmp/10_x86_Recommended/patches/119255-71/SUNWinstall-patch-utils-root/install/checkinstall: /var/tmp/10_x86_Recommended/patches/119255-71/SUNWinstall-patch-utils-root/install/checkinstall: cannot open
pkgadd: ERROR: checkinstall script did not complete successfully
I've tried applying this patch outside 'installcluster' using patchadd and the same issue is reported.
I cannot see anything obvious in any of the 'readme's and checked a number of solutions regarding loopback filesystems etc.
Are there any further methods of debugging this issue and does anyone know why this patchadd is not working?

Hi Darren,
Thanks for that - I think I've seen this one before (before Solaris 10) and never twigged that it would/could back to haunt me!
# echo<span style="color:#000000"> "install:x:0:1:installpatch braindamage:/:/bin/true"</span> >> /etc/passwd
# pwconv
# cd /tmp
# patchadd 119255-71
Validating patches...
Loading patches installed on the system...
Done!
Loading patches requested to install.
Done!
Checking patches that you specified for installation.
Done!
Approved patches will be installed in this order:
119255-71
Checking installed patches...
Executing prepatch script...
Installing patch packages...
Patch 119255-71 has been successfully installed.
See /var/sadm/patch/119255-71/log for details
Executing postpatch script...
Patch packages installed:
SUNWinstall-patch-utils-root
SUNWpkgcmdsr
SUNWpkgcmdsu
SUNWswmt
# userdel installI then deleted the user and continued the patching of the alt BE - It did not appear to require the user for the remaining pre-req patches or the other BE!
# cd /var/tmp/10_x*
# ./installcluster --apply-prereq --s10cluster
Setup .......
Solaris 10 x86 Recommended Patch Cluster (2010.01.06)
Application of patches started : 2010.01.14 16:48:36
Applying 120901-03 (1 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 121334-04 (2 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 119255-71 (3 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 119318-01 (4 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 121297-01 (5 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 122035-05 (6 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 127885-01 (7 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 141589-03 (8 of 9) ... skipped
Applying 142252-01 (9 of 9) ... skipped
Application of patches finished : 2010.01.14 16:49:01
Following patches were skipped :
Patches already applied
120901-03     119255-71     121297-01     127885-01     142252-01
121334-04     119318-01     122035-05     141589-03
Installation of prerequisite patches complete.
Install log files written :
/var/sadm/install_data/s10x_rec_cluster_short_2010.01.14_16.48.36.log
/var/sadm/install_data/s10x_rec_cluster_verbose_2010.01.14_16.48.36.log
# lustatus
Boot Environment           Is       Active Active    Can    Copy
Name                       Complete Now    On Reboot Delete Status
s10x_u8a                   yes      no     no        yes    -
s10x_u8b                   yes      yes    yes       no     -
# ./installcluster -B s10x_u8a --s10cluster
Setup ............
Solaris 10 x86 Recommended Patch Cluster (2010.01.06)
Application of patches started : 2010.01.14 16:50:59
Applying 120901-03 ( 1 of 172) ... skipped
Applying 121334-04 ( 2 of 172) ... skipped
Applying 119255-71 ( 3 of 172) ... success
Applying 119318-01 ( 4 of 172) ... skipped
...I'll add a further update once the other 172 patches have been tried and whether the BE boots or not.
Regards, Clive

Installation problem on Intel

I have tried to install Solaris 8 on my Dell machine.
I have tried to boot both directly via CD and by using Device Configuration Assistant on a floppy..
The first screen says this....
SunOS Secondary Boot version 3.00
WARNING: ACPI Tables not in Reclaim Memory
prom_panic: kmem_free block already free
Entering boot debugger:
[130ee5]:
and when i hit enter and choose c (continue execution), the m/c hangs and asks me to push ctrl-alt-del to reboot..
I don't know what the ACPI tables are .. and how i can fix this...
Anyone who knows this... please help..
Thanx a lot..

I have heard about the ACPI that may be a Power Managemnet Tools or something, it always be found in Microsoft Window 2000 Device Manager, sorry I can't help you to solve the problems.....because I also have some installation problem on my Intel paltform @_@.

Installation Problem on iTunes 6.0.1.3 - HpSdpAppCoreApp

Help!
I'm trying to install the new iTunes 6.0 and I'm getting a message during installation that says
HpSdpAppCoreApp
"The feature you are trying to use in on a network resource that is unavailable.
Click OK to try again, or enter an alternative pathway to a folder containing the installation package "HpSdpAppCoreApp.msi" in the box below."
The last time I dug through some files on my own, bad things happened.
Thanks,
C

good gracious, Chris ...
okay, try applying the general advice on installation problems given here:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=93976
... and the InstallShield Tips and Pointers are also helpful with these less-well-documented errors:
http://consumer.installshield.com/faq.asp#ts
keep us posted.
love, b

Installation problem on SUSE 12.1

Hi
I'm a Linux beginner and I am trying to install LV on SUSE 12.1
I've also posted my problems on Lava:
http://lavag.org/topic/15240-labview-installation-problem-on-suse-121/
The installation started and it looks quite all right, but when I try to start LabVIEW, the application just sits in the taskbar for about 20 seconds and then just disappears.
Any ideas?
Is there a way to debug to see what's going on?
Cheers,
Mike
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Mike,
Unfortunately, there are no versions of LabVIEW supported on SUSE 12.1 at present. Here's a link to LabVIEW version compatibility with different Linux distributions. I saw from your other forum that you're attempting to install LabVIEW 2009, which is certified for SUSE 11.0 at the latest.
Best,
Dan N
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Installation Problem on Win8

Hello all
I need your help for troubleshooting an installation problem on a Win8 (x64) client. There is already JavaJRE installed, but we wanted to install some other versions, too. But it didn't work. So we tried to unistall to curently version. This was running badly. Now there entry is removed from windows software, but the software is still on the system. Always if we try to install any java, we get a failure message with no error discription. So we looked for some installation logs, but I can't find the problem. Can you have a look? What can I do?
Thank you guys for your support.
Installation Logs:
java_install.log - Pastebin.com
java_install_reg.log - Pastebin.com
JavaDeployReg.log - Pastebin.com

Hi people!
I have two problems with nokia suite...
first of all I can't install it at my windows 8.1, I receive the message attached...
Second,
in another notebook, all time I tried to update my N8 to Symbian bella I receive a blue screen of death, at windows 8
can somebody help me?
Attachments:
mokiasuit.png ‏13 KB

Installation problem on RHEL4 ..

Installation problem on RHEL4 (Red Hat Enterprise 4) i have
install start at unzip tar.gz and tar -xf .... now i have run
./installFMS it show
./fmsini: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5:
cannot open shar
ed object file: No such file or directory
ERROR: Your are running the Macromedia Flash Media Server
installer
on the wrong platform.
it not support for fedora or anything else?
plz help....

would be nice if someone responded to this.... Macromedia
wouldn't have been this lax in giving a reply :) AND they keep up
with OS updates too :)

Xp_logininfo Installation problem

Hello gurus,
I'm facing the same problem as described in this link:
Re: xp_logininfo "Installation problem on windows 2003 with Sql 2005"
the error I get is similiar:
<i>The below message comes from executing the command master..xp_logininfo '<domain>\<user> ' Msg 15404, Level 16, State 11, Procedure xp_logininfo, Line 62 Could not obtain information about Windows NT group/user '<domain>\<user> ', error code 0x534. The statement has been terminated</i>
but I just don't get how to solve it.
-I've tried to use the profiler but didn't find any information that will help me to solve.
-One of the guys wrote to add "logon rights" to the user ... what does it mean ?
Please advice,
Dimitry Haritonov

Hi sven,
Thank you very much for the quick and direct answer.
The problem was that the user that runs the SQL SERVER service didn't have authorization to retrieve information from active directory.
I've changed the service user, run the sapinst again, and after it succeeded I've returned the previous user.
Best regards,
Dimitry Haritonov

SO7 installation problem patch 5

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for