SOAP - RFC possible with Direct Connection?

On our PI 7.1 system we have a RFC which we want to expose as a webservice with all the standard monitoring SAP PI provides. On PI 7.0 is used to create a configuration scenario in Integration Builder and generate a WSDL.
I have read the document 'Configuring Web Service Scenarios', but it is not clear to me if i can create a AS JAVA 7.1 -> AS ABAP 7.1 scenario and if the 'Direct Connection'-functionality of SAP PI 7.1 offers me a solution.
Please advise me...

Hi,
in PI7.1 direct connection uses WS adapter which works on WS-RM protocol.............your req is to expose RFC as web-service which do not work on WS-RM protocol and moreover you will require RFC adapter for configuration of your scenario.... So SOAP->RFC is not possible with Direct connection in PI7.1.
Regards,
Rajeev Gupta

Similar Messages

  • Problem with direct connect on my 8350i

    when i try to use my direct connect on my smartphone it beeps and says turn radio on. i can turn the radio on and try again and it says the same thing. when someone dc's my phone i try to answer and it tells me again to turn on radio. called nextel and they said to do a master radio reset and it still didn't work. now they tell me it is a software issue and they can't help me. i need help please.

    Hi and Welcome to the Forums!
    Wow! Formal support for all BBs is via the carriers...for them to blow you off like that is pretty horrible. I'd suggest contacting them again and push them a little bit more...you have a support agreement with them, if they are not honoring it, escalate with them.
    In the meantime, are you on their most recent device OS level? If not, then you might consider updating to see if indeed what they have said holds some kernel of truth. You can check their DL site via this portal:
    http://na.blackberry.com/eng/support/downloads/dow​nload_sites.jsp
    Good luck and let us know!
    Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
    If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
    Join our BBM Channels
    BSCF General Channel
    PIN: C0001B7B4   Display/Scan Bar Code
    Knowledge Base Updates
    PIN: C0005A9AA   Display/Scan Bar Code

  • Limitations associated with Direct Connecting arrays to UCS FIs.

    I understand that in order to direct connect an array to UCS, the FIs have to be put into Switch mode(NPIV).  But once the FI's are in Switch Mode, is it impossible to attach other SAN switches to the fabric interconnects?
    It is my understanding that you could accomplish this because it wouldn't be much different then an extended SAN fabric in which an array's traffic would have to travel through 2 FC switches to arrive at a host.  But perhaps I'm missing something.
    Thanks in advance.

    You can have directly attached storage and FC switches at the same time, in fact until recently it was required since UCS did not do zoning. 
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/servers-unified-computing/ucs-infrastructure-ucs-manager-software/116082-config-ucs-das-00.html
    The questions is whether you really want to do it that way, I think for 95% of deployments, if not more, end host mode is recommended. 
    If you're already planning to attach FC switches, best to place storage on them. 
    Have a look at FlexPod (of Vblock) designs.

  • Is it possible to directly connect two Xserves with a Promise VTrak E610fD via Fibre?

    I have two Xserves and I'd like to connect them with a Promise VTrak E610fD. As this storage has two controllers, I'd like to connect both Xserve with both controllers. Is this setup possible? Can I access (read and write) the same disk array with both Xserves simultaneously (Xsan?) or do I have to create two separate arrays?

    Hello bleistift, and welcome to the AppleBoards,
    Fibre channel is SCSI which means that any device connected by fibre assumes it is in sole control of that device. When you attach more than one machine via fibre both machines assume they are in control and unexpected behaviors and data corruption ensues. SAN (like Apple's XSAN) provides a layer of arbitration over the shares allowing multiple fibre connections to play nicely with one another while still being connected over fibre.
    You could easily connect two machines to a single RAID box if they are accessing different RAID volumes at the same time, but once you start connecting to the same data at the same time you need SAN.
    HTH,
    =Tod

  • Airport utility cannot find my Airport Express, repeated rescans, nothing, even with direct connect via Ethernet. Help!

    I use Airport Express to stream iTunes to my home stereo. This is the ONLY thing I use it for. It quit working and now Airport Utility cannot find the Airport Express unit, even after repeated re-boots of all components, resetting the Airport Express, even when connected directly to my router via Ethernet. I use a D-Link wirless router.
    I downloaded the latest Airport Utility, but it will NOT work with XP (from the Apple website, not my words).
    The Airport Express will achieve a solid green indicator after reset, but Airport Utility cannot find it. Until Utility can find and recognize the Airport Express hardware, I cannot adjust or reset any settings, etc.
    Help!

    I downloaded the latest Airport Utility, but it will NOT work with XP (from the Apple website, not my words).
    The latest version of AirPort Utility.....5.6.1.....will only run on a Windows 7 machine.
    Try AirPort Utility 5.5.3 for Windows (make sure that  you have Service Pack 3 installed on your PC, otherwise the application will not run on an XP machine).
    The Airport Express will achieve a solid green indicator after reset, but Airport Utility cannot find it.
    After a "hard reset" or "factory default reset", the light will not be green.....it will be slowly flashing amber after it restarts. See this Apple support document for more information on various resets:
    Resetting an AirPort Base Station or Time Capsule FAQ

  • Problems with direct connection to WRT54G

    I've had an WRT54G for over two years.  I rarely use it for a wireless network, and usually just have one PC connected to it via ethernet.  I've gotten accustomed to losing internet connectivity every few weeks and having to unplug the router and plug it back in.  Lately, I'm losing internet connectivity on a daily basis.  Unplugging it and plugging it back in always solves the problem, but it's a nuisance.  Any advice?  Thanks.

    www.linksysbycisco.com/downloads
    Go to website linksysbycisco.com/downloads.........insert model no of your router in serach tab......select proper version of your router........download the firmware file......
    save that file on desktop
    Firmware Upgrade/Reflash
    Follow these steps to upgrade the firmware on the device: -
    Open an Internet Explorer browser page.In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1
    Leave the username blank & in password use admin in lower case...
    Click on the 'Administration' tab- Then click on the 'Firmware Upgrade' sub tab- Here click on 'Browse' and browse the .bin firmware file and click on "Upgrade"...
    Wait for few seconds until it shows that "Upgrade is successful"  After the firmware upgrade, click on "Reboot" and you will be returned back to the same page OR it will say "Page cannot be
    displayed".
    Press and hold the reset button for 30 seconds...Release the reset button...Unplug the power cable from your router, wait for 30 seconds and re-connect the power cable...Now re-configure your
    router...

  • Direct connect NFS/CIFS with 1.4

    I see how 1.4's appliance ports can help with direct connect multipath iSCSI. Each fabric gets a VLAN/subnet, iSCSI has multiple targets via each fabric, etc.
    But I don't see how appliance ports help with direct connect NFS/CIFS. E.g.,
    In this diagram, traffic from hosts active on fabric B must go over the northbound LAN to reach the NAS. Even if every host and appliance has its NIC failover configured to prefer fabric A and perform preemption, you'll still have failures like NAS NIC's and IOM's that will cause some/all NAS traffic to go across the northbound LAN. Thus, you've got one of two situations:
        1) The LAN can handle the NAS traffic. If so, why not plug the NAS into the LAN in the first place?
        2) The LAN cannot handle the traffic, in which case you haven't built real fault-tolerance and, worse, a UCS problem can impact the LAN.
    Am I missing something here? How are appliance ports better than using switch mode, shown below?

    Yes - you have a valid point on the traffic pattern depending on what fails etc.
    Just to back up for a moment..
    Version 1.3 and below has 2 types of Ethernet ports - Uplink and Server port.
    Version 1.4 has 4 types of Ethernet ports - Uplink, Server, Appliance, Monitoring port
    In 1.3, to directly connecting a NAS to the FI's meant that you move to switch mode on the FI's and then set the port connecting to the NAS as an uplink port. What that did is that the port connecting to the NAS was a a trunk port at the FI end allowing all VLANs (i.e no VLAN filtering), no QoS settings etc.
    So if you wanted to stay in End Host mode AND not liking the above caveats, you connected the NAS to an upstream switch and not UCS and that option remains wit you today.
    What the appliance port gives you now is that the VLAN(s) the NAS belongs to can be filtered, QoS settings possible and most importantly, it works in End Host Mode (most deployments are based on it).
    The above is the rationale for the Appliance port and the port type was neeeded even if it works today in switch mode.
    Now the question comes, appliance port in EHM or Switch mode (which is what the question is).
    In EHM you are right, east-west traffic between NAS-blades could utilize the upstream network.
    You can design efficiently by specifying the fabric id (A or B as primary) or set fabric affinity if using a soft switch but  guaranteed total localization (not using upstream network) cannot be made as you correctly said depending on "what" fails.
    If all the uplinks on A fail, yes the whole thing should fail over but if a link between the IOM and the FI fails, then the servers pinned to that link will start using the external network.
    So yes, the network needs to be designed keeping the flows and what if scenarios in mind. East-west traffic not hitting upstream at all cannot be assumed.
    The long term solution is to have data links between the FI's in EHM or they are vPC peers and hence both links to the NAS from the FI's will be active/active.
    Appliance port in switch mode can be used but that also depends on which links are STP blocked etc to guarantee that.
    The topology you mentioned does that ..but then you also need to keep in mind on failurea what happens etc i.e the ISL between the FI's should always be forwarding for that VLAN.
    Thanks
    --Manish

  • Directly connect two N7700 via 100Gb link

    Hello,
    We are using N7700 chassis with 100G line cards (N77-F312CK-26).
    Transceivers are 100GBASE-SR10 (link).
    I'm wondering if it's possible to directly connect two chassis using some 24-fiber MPO cable, e.g. this one.
    My most concern is about polarity issues, because aforementioned cable doesn't have a possibility to change it in-place (unlike PanMPO connectors).
    P.S. I've also found this document (link), that states such configuration is possible, although the cable from another manufacturer is used.

    Just received an e-mail from Panduit support:
    Panduit Response:
    Hello,
    Yes, our 24F cable is capable of direct connect.  Fibers 1-12 on one end go to 13-24 on the other and 13-24 hit 1-12.
    I trust that this helps clarify the situation

  • Cannot ping Cisco C series server using direct connect to UCSM

    We have connected 2 Cisco C series servers (VIC 1225 Cards) with direct connect to Fabric Interconnects and managed via UCSM but cannot get network working.
    Service profiles have been created and pushed with only 1 VLAN and the default VLAN as native but cannot communicate with IP address configured.  Mac address is learnt at the Nexus 5K northbound switches.  Seems to be a VLAN tagging issue somewhere

    We do not use the CIMC as the server is all managed from UCSM and the CIMC has to be set to default for this mode
    Sorry I was not clear; I mean of course that even with UCSM, your C-series server will get an IP address for CIMC, which is used if you open a KVM session. You should be able to ping this IP address.

  • Direct Connect Macbook Pro to Mac Pro?

    Is it possible to direct connect my Mac Book Pro to My Mac Pro via firewire for a quicker back up of the Mac book?

    perform that function exactly this manner;
    Mac Pro power up and booted.
    connect firewire to Mac Pro first then to MBPro. Power on MBPro and hold down T key until you see the firewire on MBPro display.
    when done, unmount MBPro from Mac Pro desktop. Power MBPro down then disconnect firewire cable from Mac Pro first then MBPro.

  • Directly connect EJB via SOAP

    Hi,
    the SOAP samples provided with the IAS are using a client-class as service to connect to an EJB.
    Apache-SOAP offers the way to connect directly to an EJB using the classes StatefulEJBProvider or StatefulEJBProvider.
    Trying this alternative produces several curious effects. For instance handling HttpSessions seems to be impossible and memory is allocated with every request and will never be released.
    Has anybody experiences with this way of communication with an EJB in IAS? I know that IBM Websphere is providing own EJBProvider classes for SOAP. Possibly there are such classes for IAS too, but I've found nothing in the guides regarding this topic!?
    Best regards,
    Gunnar Osterode

    Please visit the following site for new samples being posted. The hello world sample addresses this EJBPluggable Provider classes.
    http://developer.iplanet.com/appserver/samples/
    This sample demonstrates the direct access to the stateless EJB. This would be almost same in the case of statefull session EJBs, except that you have to use the FulTargetObject URI in the urn part at the client side. I answered the same kind of question yesterday. you can refer to that. I can help you for more details. I have attached client java files and DeploymentDesrciptor.xml.
    I hope this should help. This shopping cart sample will be soon on the site.

  • Direct Connection ABAP Proxy and Java Proxy possible ????

    Hi Folks ,
    As i read as direct connection possible between 2 SAP systems only ..
    and also i read as WS Direct Connection u2013 (Java) ..
    What it means ?? is it ABAP Proxy to Java Proxy using Direct connection ??  Like Java Client Proxy and ABAP Server proxy
    I am not clear on this.. Could you please explain or help me on this . ??
    Siva..

    Hi ,
    +You can do both for java proxies as well Abap proxies.+
    As per the following points
    1. Point-to-point connection is a new capability available with SAP NW PI 7.1. It allows applications or systems to send messages using WS-RM without going through a middleware, e.g. PI, but still using a centralized tool to design and
    configure the interfaces and connection properties.
    2. SAP XI 3.0/PI 7.00 or higher releases can be licensed based on the total volume of messages in
    gigabytes (GB) that is processed per month. The size of the payload is determined in the integration
    server. The information is then aggregated according to sender and receiver system.
    Question :
    1. If Message exchange between 2 SAP applications using direct connection .. Then dont we need to consider about licencing cost for volume of messages per month ?
    2. So if i use ABAP Client Proxy to Java Server proxy  scenario.. can i use direct connection  ? Eg., SAP ECC to java application ?
    In both the cases PI Runtime is not required  .. Am i right ?
    Please clarify..
    Siva..

  • Is it possible to retrieve data using RFC alone with out using BAPI ?

    Hi ,
    Is it possible to connect SAP to Non-SAP systems to retrieve data using RFC alone with out using BAPI ?
    thanks
    Rama

    Hello Nelson,
    Could you please explain how this can be done. Because my understanding is that only BAPI can be used to connect Non SAP and SAP system not RFC function module.
    Regards
    Farzan

  • Is possible to work with both Connection Pool?

    Hello,
    I would like to know if is it possible to work with both Connection Pools: Active Directory and DWH User? If it's yes, how can I specify to work with both simultaneously?
    Thank you and regards,
    Mónica.

    Hello Gayathri,
    The version is OBISE1 10.1.3.2.1
    The scenario is the following:
    I have two connection pools
    - One is mapping the DWH and it is using the System's variables :USER and :PASSWORD. Then I have an Initialization Block that get these values and I have created the logins as users in the database.
    - The other is mapping the DWH tables.
    I want to create directly users into the repository. The problem is the users of the repository cann't do the login because the first connection pool is trying to validate then against the database.
    Would be possible to validate the users against the connection pool and the repository simultaneously?
    Thank you and regards,
    Mónica.

  • Does PI need a direct connection to third party or can work with a proxy server based connection to third party?

    does PI need a direct connection to third party or can work with a proxy server based connection to third party?

    Hi,
    It basically includes 3 systems, one is our ECC sender system, middle one is PI box and third one is the receiver system. Data is successfully reaching to PI system from our sender system.Now we want to forward this to our third party system from PI box.
                                                                    I want to know that such sending of data requires direct connection to third party or it can be done by proxy server based connection to third party.If it is possible then what are the steps to do this?
    Regards-
    Anuj Nogja

Maybe you are looking for