Soft Warnings Issue in MSS

Hi All,
This is regarding the MSS Salary Planning Module on SAP Enterprise Portal.
We have observed the following:
a) Salary Planning of ECM Module in SAP MSS Business Package fetches all the fields from the object and data provider framework.
b) EC_PERCENT ( Percentage or Increase Percentage) is Standard SAP Delivered Columns.
c) We have made the Increase Percentage as an Input field in the Application.
d) We observe the Soft Warning messages generated in the Application whenever the Increase Percentage crosses the range of allowed percentage
( example: if the employee hike must lie in 2.00 to 4.00 % , user enters 5.00% hike, the warning message is displayed as " salary planning - percentage of xxx exceeds upper limit of 4.00% " ).
e) Upon successful validation, the increase percentage amount is stored in PA0759-CPPCT for the corresponding employee
Query:
We need to know, where is the upper limit and lower limit for increase percentage is set.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Subashini.

yes its mandatory to upgrade both FRONT END And backend to the compatible levels.
You cant have one at a higher level than other.
You need to read the notes which are regularly updated by SAP.
You can search for these notes by giving Stack level
Service.sap.com

Similar Messages

Stylesheet issue in MSS page

Hi,
I am getting stylesheet issue with MSS page after Support Pack Upgrade in our SAP system.
Prior to upgrade the button was appearing with yellow background color.This has changed after upgrade and now there is no backgroud color for the button.Please suggest.
Regards,
Mrinalika
Before Support Pack Upgrade
After Support Pack Upgrade

yes its mandatory to upgrade both FRONT END And backend to the compatible levels.
You cant have one at a higher level than other.
You need to read the notes which are regularly updated by SAP.
You can search for these notes by giving Stack level
Service.sap.com

Soft-Proofing issue

I'm having hard time understanding soft-proofing even if I watched the video softproofing video. I turned S-P on for a bright and vivid image, create a virtual copy, set target colorspace to sRGB. It tells me that some colors are too saturated so I select them and reduce them until the RED goes away. It now gives me a poor copy of the original (dull colors). How come, when I export my image as .jpeg with a sRGB color profile, my target jpeg is identical to my untouched RAW file.
I thought the goal of soft-proofing was to make sure that I can emulate the limitation of a target color profile (like sRGB). In my case, if my colors in the jpeg export are identical to my RAW image, how come LR shows them as too saturated?
can someone enlighten me.

theslayerizer wrote:
My problems is that LR indicate color limitations in my picture but when I export my source picture with jpeg in sRGB it displays exactly like my source in Lightroom. So why does it show me limitations that I don't really see when I do my export. If the soft proof was accurate, my expectation is that my exported jpeg should have color issues due to the color warnings that LR showed me when I turned soft-proof on.
First, the OOG isn’t accurate. See the other thread here on soft proofing. If I export data as sRGB from LR, re import it and ask to see Out Of Gamut (OOG) overlay for that space, some OOG still shows up. It should not. It doesn’t when you do the same operation in Photoshop.
But the real use here is to show you what colors are in the LR color space (Melissa RGB) that can’t be reproduced on any device based on any profile. So it is useful to some degree. But in the end, there isn’t anything you can do about it IF you decide to convert to that output space. You view something soft proofed in sRGB and there is an ugly red overlay. You are going to convert to sRGB so colors are going to clip as a result. In my video, I illustrate it is simply educational, and easier to simply let the profile do it’s thing and convert to a smaller color space (because that is what you need). You could screw around and attempt to do this manually with HSL or other controls, but the net results are not as good and just take longer. So use the OOG overlay with some care and don’t be overall alarmed. Taking wide gamut data and funneling it into a smaller gamut is just something we have to do.

Soft proofing issue in CS4 using iMac and Epson 3880?

I have had great success printing to an Epson r1900 never using soft proofing. Purchased a new 3880 and having colour problems. A suggestion was made to use soft proofing. Monitor is calibrated using iOne-looks very good to the eye. Working space from camera to PS is Adobe RGB. I am setting my custom output device to ICC profile for paper (ilford and hanhmule) Is this correct/ 9or should I be setting to Epson Apple RGB? On screen, the proof color looks WAY off the monitor non-proof version, which is spot on, but when I print the image it doesn't look at all like the "soft proof" it looks more like the monitor version. I have read everything I can find-printing on the 3880 is a crap-shoot. Sometimes it matches the screen, sometimes it doesn't and when it doesn't it also isn't matching the soft proof.
Suggestions?
Thanks!
NJ

Victoria....
Seems I was to much an optimist...heh
As I mentioned I did get LR4b on the Imac to find the icc profiles of my epson 2880 but while I was trying to figure out why it would not read my epson 3880 icc profiles and others LR4b suddely corrupted the pref filels once again and I was at ground zero... Just like I was when I first posted on the forum.
I again threw out the LR4b pref files and it brought back the epson 2280 profiles only??
So why can't it find my epson 3880 icc profiles or others and only the 2880's... and why do the pref files corrupt. I was actually soft proofing when the corruption took place and the icc profiles disappeared.
I'm running the exact same OS on my Macbook Pro and none of these issues have surfaced.
Oh... I did notice that the fact I require authenication to trash LR4b on the Imac did excist on the Macbook Pro as well ... so I'm guessing this normal or I have two wierd computers.
Got to love computers..
Thanks
George

Issue in MSS Report - Team Absence Overview after backend patching

Hi Experts,
We have SAP EP 640 SP23 connected to backend ERP2004 SP23. we have applied SAP_HRCGB patch 60 on backend system and now facing issues in accessing MSS reports from portal - Team Absence Overview, Basic Employee Data,etc.
Exception from defaulttrace is :
com.sapportals.portal.prt.component.PortalComponentException: Error in service call of Portal Component
Component : pcd:portal_content/Pearson/com.pearson.Roles/com.pearson.FT-UK2/com.pearson.MSS_UK2/com.pearson.employee_review_2/com.sap.pct.hcm.eeprofilemonitoringoftasks
When we apply patches in backend system (for SAP_HR component), is it mandatory to apply patches for the deployed ESS/MSS business packages in portal also. And where can we find the information which patch of business package is corresponding to backend patches.
Would highly appreciate your help.
Regards
Davinder

yes its mandatory to upgrade both FRONT END And backend to the compatible levels.
You cant have one at a higher level than other.
You need to read the notes which are regularly updated by SAP.
You can search for these notes by giving Stack level
Service.sap.com

SAP FIORI Android soft keyboard issues

Hi Folks,
In case of forms which occupy the whole screen of android tablets, on accessing the form fields, the soft keypad doesn't push the form up. Instead, it is overlapping the form.
This issue doesn't occur in ios.
using sap.m controls and sap.ui.commons.forms
ui5 development toolkit version 1.12.5.
device: samsung tablets in landscape mode.
Is there any workaround/fix for pushing the form up to make way for soft keyboard for android tablets ?

Just discovered StageText. Looks very promising to solve a lot of my issues:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/flash/text/StageText.ht ml
- Aaron

60d soft focus issues

I've had my 60d 8 months and within the last month or so I've been experiencing soft focus. I've tried different lens so it's not my lens. I have it set on AF and not manual and am still having the less than crisp images being produced. Any suggestions or ideas?
Thanks

This actually isn't bad... it needs a little TLC in Lightroom but the data is there and it doesn't look very soft (at least in this reduced size).
Here's what the EXIF data tells me (there's more but I'm just pasting the exposure info):
Camera: Canon EOS 60D
Lens: EF-S10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Shot at 20 mm
Exposure: Auto bracket exposure, Aperture priority AE, 1/30 sec, f/22, ISO 200, Compensation: +1
I can see you're using aperture priority (good!)
I can see you set the f-stop to f/22 using a 20mm lens. What I can't see (because the lens doesn't provide the data) is the focused distance.
I can tell you that when using this camera with that lens at 20mm and f/22, the "hyperfocal" distance is a mere 3.12 feet... meaning if you focused to 3.12' then everything from about 1.5' to infinity would be in acceptable focus.
At f/22 you're going to be getting some diffraction issues... mostly these will only be noticeable if you zoom to 100% (e.g. large prints). But small image sizes wont reveal them. At 20mm using f/11 the hyperfocal distance becomes 6.17' (I have an app to look this up) and everything from 3' to infinity would be in focus... but with substantially less diffraction (diffraction is based on laws of physics and lens quality has no bearing on it... the math for calculating diffraction assume "perfect" optics.) Diffraction is related to the wave-nature of light and what happens when you put light through small openings. Light doesn't technically focus to a single "point"... it focuses to a spot known as an "Airy disk" (named for the astronomer, George Airy, who discovered it.) It turns out the smaller the aperture size (larger f-stops) the larger the size of this spot. There comes a point where it's not only larger than a single pixel... it may be larger than several pixels.
ANOTHER issue I notice is that your shutter speed is 1/30th second in this shot. If you're on a tripod that's probably not a big deal. But if you are hand-holding the camera... it's tough (though not impossible) to hold the camera stady enough to have no effects of camera motion causing some blur. Even "mirror slap" vibration can be a problem if a tripod isn't solid or if you've got windy conditions blowing the camera while it's trying to take the shot.
Lightroom will let you apply some sharpening to tighten up the shot.
I messed with this just briefly using Nik Vivezza... brought down the exposure a bit, reduced exposure on the clouds and boosted contrast in clouds to create more contrast. Reduced exposure on the highlighted area of the hills. Also applied overall sharpening. The whole thing actually improves considerably and this is with the reduced resolution JPEG. You could work wonders on this with the RAW image (btw, if you're shooting landscapes.... always shoot in RAW and let Lightroom deal with the RAW to JPEG conversion. You'll get MUCH more data and far more adjustment latitude that way.
If you want to have fun with this, post the full size version (preferably RAW if you have it as a RAW) somewhere then (a) provide a link and (b) invite people to try their hand at processing it for you and I think you'll be quite suprised at how good some of the results will be.
Tim Campbell
5D II, 5D III, 60Da

MSI P55-GD65 soft reset issue

I have an issue with soft reset, and restart from Win7 x64 or Ubuntu. After I made these restarts or soft reset, the PC is not responding only for a hard reset or for the power button hold to power off the PC.
I have:
MB: MSI p55-gd65, BIOS is 1.A
RAM: Mushkin 996659es 2x2GB ES3-12800
CPU: Intel Core i7-860 (stock clockspeed)
CPU cooler: Scythe Kama Angle with 3 Scythe 12cm Fans
GPU: MSI GTX260 TwinFrozr OC 896MB
HDD: 500GB Samsung HD502HJ and 1000GB WDC WD10EADS-00L5B1
DVD: NEC/Optiarc DVD RW AD-7240S
PSU: Cougar GX-600
Chassis: Lancool K58 with 2x140cm fans front, 2x140cm fans top, 1x140cm fan side, 1x120cm fan back (all fans are Fractal Design)
And other issue I have is the Turbo Boost not working correctly after I updated the BIOS. It only can 3.34 GHz oc, before 1.A it can do more than 3.5, 3.6 GHz.
All issues came out after a successful BIOS update with LiveUpdate. After I have found the issues I tried BIOS's M-Flash from a pendrive, issues came out again after a time.

I found that the BIOS has a faulty High/Low VDrop usage, because Low VDrop gets the error, but when I change it to High VDrop this error is gone. I haven't tried with OC-ing the CPU yet.

Jabber for windows soft phone issue

Hi Guys
Wondering if anyone has come accross this.. I have just installed J4W 10.5.2, the presence / IM works fine however the soft phone doesn't register. it comes up with error.. Connection error. Ensure the server information in the Phone Services tab on the Options window is correct. Contact your system administrator for assistance
The machine is obviously on the data VLAN.. however when i connect the machine to the voice VLAN the soft phone registers ok.. see attached document
A little background.. the SVIs for the VLANS are on a firewall but there are no restrictions between the data and voice VLANs .. see attached
please help

Did you find a solution to this i have a PC that is doing the exact same? softphone doesn't work on data VLAN but does switched to Voice VLAN it connects and works properly.
PC connected direct to Data VLAN
-Allows CTI control of DeskPhone Softphone fails.
PC connected Direct to Voice VLAN
-Allows CTI contol of DeskPhone Softphone works.
Does not seem to be a Network problem because can use the same ports on a My Laptop and the Jabber Client works on Both VLANS

Issue with MSS 1.41

Good Night.
In the configuration standard that is displayed in the portal in the MSS->Team->Employee Information->General Information
In the Iview Employee search the system only display in the "table control" the employee that is in the area of resposability of the chief, but not display employee that are in other Organizational Unit that depend of the chief.
[Image|http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/602f7e0681.jpg]
ie.
Organizational Unit A
Chief = Juan Perez.
Employee 1 = Forest Gumpt
Employee 2 = Potter Harry
Organizational Unit B
Chief = Jhon Uribe
Employee 3 = Jose Sanchez
The employee Employee 3 ( Jose Sanchez), depend of the Chief Juan Perez.
I want that the employee 3 is displayed in the table control.
How can solved this?
What should I do of configuration in the portal and the backend?
Regards

Not Solved

My computer is having possible soft wear issues

A lot of the letters on my Bluetooth keyboard won't work and when I'm on the computer looking through menues the cursor is all over the place going crazy... I don't know how to fix this issue. It's probably software.. Also I think my computer randomly installed the new mavericks update. Or something but I'm not sure! Please help me :(

If you have automatic updates switched on (system preferences > app store), then the update from 10.9.0 to 10.9.1 will have been done automatically (not "randomly"). The update to Mavericks from an earlier version of OSX would not happen without your active involvement.
Re. Keyboard and mouse, I suggest you try deleting the Bluetooth pairings and re-pair them. If this doesn't work, try PRAM and SMC resets
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1379
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3964
With SMC reset, follow instructions for Mac with battery you should not remove on your own.

Fix the metadata consistency warnings issue ...

Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 14026] Unable to navigate requested expression: AR.AR_TP_ID. Please fix the metadata consistency warnings. (HY000)
Please help me to find the solution.

Hi,
I've got the following problem :
HY000 CODE : 10058 [NQODBC][SQLSTATE : HY000][NQSERROR:10058] a general error occurred. [NQSERROR:14026] Unable to navigate requested expression : Dim - Werkgever.WGVR Nr[]. Please fix the metadata consistency warnings (HY000)
How can I fix this problem ???
When I do a Global consistency check via the administration tool, I get no errors and no warnings. Nothing is changed in the Dim - Werkgever.
Who can help me ?
Kind Regards,
Else

G5 doesn't mount Sata raid - hardware or (soft) data issue?

I had another thread going related to this. After much screwing around, here's my final question...
is it credible to think that a (Sonnet Tempo) card on a (late 2004 G5 PCI-X OS 10.4.9) would spew this error to the console (below) if there was merely corrupt data on the Sata raid. After problems mounting the atto striped drives - a new replacement enclosure worked out of the box twice, then not. Now nada & this error msg. When the raid volumes decide not to mount - no utility I own can see anything out there.
I'm almost ready to kiss my raid files goodbye but have this nagging feeling it's the port-multiplier encloure or compatibility issue and not the drives themselves because they came back to life for a while with the replacement Maxx Digital ro Raid II has a 936 Silicon Image chipset that stopped working.
Thanks,
Paul
running
Oct 28 20:47:45 Pauls-G5 kernel[0]: SonnetSATA::mv (ERROR) SStatus 0x00000000:
Oct 28 20:47:45 Pauls-G5 kernel[0]: SonnetSATA::mv (ERROR) SControl 0x00000300:
Oct 28 20:47:45 Pauls-G5 kernel[0]: SonnetSATA::mv (ERROR) SError 0x00000000:
Oct 28 20:47:45 Pauls-G5 kernel[0]: SonnetSATA::mv (ERROR) IF Ctrl 0x00000000: TXPort 0x0
Oct 28 20:47:45 Pauls-G5 kernel[0]: SonnetSATA::mv (ERROR) IF status 0x00804000: RXFIS 0x0 RXPort 0x0
Oct 28 20:47:53 Pauls-G5 kernel[0]: SonnetSATA::sataEventNotify@0 Cable Event Connect
Oct 28 20:47:58 Pauls-G5 kernel[0]: SonnetSATA::mv (FATAL_ERROR) 36880 0: SaDevInterrupt: No command is running
earlier thread "disappearing SATA drives "

Hi Hatter - In Jan 07 the vendor Maxx Digital instructed me to use atto ExpressStripe. I'm not wedded to it except at this point that's how the drives with my valuable data happen to be striped. If I have to start over I'm sure I'd use SoftRAID or Apple RAID. Except for that legacy aspect, I've only mentioned atto ExpressStripe as one of two utilities I have that might "see" drives that don't mount (which they don't). I haven't tried DiskWarrior thinking it would not be any more likely to "see" the hardware.
DP even though other things are more suspect, I'm sending the Tempo sata card back to Sonnet for evaluation, repair/replace.
Thanks,
Paul

Yoga 2 Pro: deactivating pad in yoga modes, soft keyboard in non-microsoft sw, scaling Windows?

I installed Windows 8.1 pro due to the need of domain, I also downloaded and installed all Lenovo software as well as drivers. I am also using Classic Shell to get a "normal" start menu.
Issue 1: Keyboard disables when not in laptop mode, touchpad is allways enabled. How do I disable touchpad in tent, stand tablet mode?
Issue 2: Soft keyboard shows up in Microsoft software, however it does not show up when typing in other software, Firefox, Lightroom etc. Is there a way to make this work?
Issue 3: In full resolution Windows scale bad, as several computers now delivers with this high resolution and 4K monitors will be more common, is there a fix from Microsoft to get normal scaling? Ie. menues are very small making it hard to hit the correct button on touchscreen.

I, too, have the soft keyboard issue. If I'm already editing some text and switch modes, the keyboard shows. If I move to tent/tablet mode and try to edit - no keyboard!!! The is an On-Screen Keyboard app but it fills the entire screen. Useless. Surely there is an answer to this problem?

HD to Pal SD 16:9 DVD issues

Hi all,
I have searched the forums for days and can’t find the best solution; I’m having trouble creating a Good PAL 16:9 SD DVD from a HD Source. The issues I’m having is the DVD looks washed out and very soft, also the graphics look bad with lines through them like they are not resolved properly.
I have being making DVD’s with compressor for about 5 years and I would be happy if I could get the same quality as when we used to shoot in DV.
Below is my process:
Shoot
Sony EX3 Camera 1920x1080i50,
Edit Timeline
1920x1080i
Prores 422,
Pixel aspect ratio: Square pixels
Field dominance: Upper
I have tried all solutions on the forums such as turning on Frame control(combination of different setting), down converting in FCP first, down converting in Compressor first, tried CB instead of VBR.
After days of testing, the best result I have had so far is to out put HD from fcp then get MPEG Streamclip to do the down convert then use compressor to make the DVD. This fixes the problem with the titles but not the soft focus issue.
Also I’m checking these DVD’s on a full def Sony LCD and SD CRT. It does look better on the SD CRT but most of my clients have LCD’s.
One thought I had is that my original footage uses square pixels but compressor changes it to 0.7031 Pal 601(16:9) I’m not sure what affect this is having on the quality of the DVD?
I'm using FCP 7.02 and Compressor 3.5.2
I would appreciate any help.(Plus I can’t wait til my clients get Blu-ray!)

I've been having similar problems, and it appears as if us in PAL world seem to get hit harder with this, leading me to think that the problem is in the Upper Field Dominance of HD being sloppily converted to Lower Field Dominance of PAL DVD. Those in NTSC world start in upper and finish in upper field dominance.
For the record, I'm using HDV 1080i 50 footage from our Z5's recording to flash card, ingested using Log and Transfer (with the Sony memory unit plug for FCP installed).
Many people have put forward their suggestions for HD to DVD workflow. Almost all of them are from the US and don't have to worry about moving from one format to another with different field dominance. No one has been able to tell me where the change takes place... they just know it happens somehow. If you are going from FCP to Compressor to DVD SP, I think DVD SP is changing the dominance as it preps for PAL DVD. I don't know how hard the conversion is, but I don't like the idea of DVD SP doing it.
I tried changing Compressor's settings to output in lower field dominance, btu all I got was unwatchable flicker.
I tried a demo version of BitVice and it yielded the same results as Compressor (just poor quality when field dominance set to "Same as source" and unwatchable flicker when set to lower). This adds weight to my theory that the problem is in the field dominance conversion which I think is being done by DVD SP. Maybe if an expert on this field dominance can confirm or rule out my theory, I can move past this bump in the road.
Has anyone tried moving projects over to the Adove suite and outputted via Encore?
Cheers
Dav

Soft Warnings Issue in MSS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for