Software center downloading 0%

I created my June update (14 updates) all but 4 are seem to be stuck when looking at the Software Center Downloading 0% , it's been like this for 2 days. 
MSB

Is this all clients or just the one client?
What to the logs say on the client for contenttransfermanager, cas, and/or updatesdeployment.log?  (there are more logs that might have information, too, but those are some to start with).
My guess is the content you want simply isn't on your distribution points, or that particular client can't find the content on your DPs, possibly you've protected your DPs and this client doesn't have rights to the DPs with that content. (?)
Standardize. Simplify. Automate.

Similar Messages

  • Update deployment shows downloading 0% in Software center.

    Hi All,
    I am trying to patch a windows server 2012 R2 server using SCCM 2012 R2. The update is deployed to the collection & received in the machine but the file download always shows 0% in software center.
    Please help.
    Thanks,
    Pranay.

    Thanks Jacob,
    found the solution at your one of other post :-
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/7c7f8538-c2e2-4ecc-ad05-dca13d00559e/error-sending-dav-request-http-code-500-status-internal-server-error?forum=configmanagergeneral
    http://venusingireddy.blogspot.in/2013/07/error-sending-dav-request-http-code-500.html
    I was having the same problem.
    Thanks,
    Pranay.

  • Applications Stuck at 0% Downloading in Software Center

    I'm currently utilizing a SCCM 2012 R2 environment with roughly 100 Distribution Points.  The problem I'm running into is that random Applications will get stuck at 0% downloading at a location for all client PCs.  This same application will have
    no problem at a different location using a different DP.  The only remediation I could find was to redistribute the application to the specific DP.  Once this is done, the application downloads and installs without a problem.
    What is frustrating is the fact that this appears to be happening to random applications.  It's never for an application in which all distribution points need to redistribute, it's always one single DP.  It also appears to be happening for random
    DPs, it hasn't been the same DP ever.
    Any suggestions would be extremely helpful, and I could provide additional information if need be.

    Hi,
    I found several similar threads in this forum. And many reasons are causing the same symptom. Such as IIS permission on specific folder, device moving from a collection to
    another.
    Software
    Center stuck on Downloading (0% complete) when trying to install an application
    SCCM
    2012 R2 Stuck at "Downloading (0% Complete)
    Programmatically
    Deployed TaskSequence getting Stuck in Software Center at Downloading(0%) of Resource.
    In addition, logs are always helpful to the troubleshooting.
    distmgr.log
    Records details about package creation, compression, delta replication, and information updates.
    execmgr.log
    Records details about packages and task sequences that run on the client.

  • Software Center - Update stuck downloading

    Good morning
    We have pushed a few updates out to a number of clients via SCCM but for some reason we have an update (KB2962407) which appears to be stuck in the Downloading stage. It's stuck at 50%.
    I have manually downloaded this update and installed it to the clients but in Software Center it is still showing up 'Downloading (50%)
    I know this update has now been installed.
    Is there a way for me to make this disappear or see it as being installed?

    Hi,
    Are you sure that the update in questions is distributed to the DP that the client use? Normally these issues are related to content not beeing available, boundary / boundary groups noty configured correctly.
    Here is a blog post that explains log files and assists in the troubleshooting process.
    http://it.peikkoluola.net/2013/12/02/windows-update-sup-troubleshooting-in-sccm-2012/
    Regards,
    Jörgen
    -- My System Center blog ccmexec.com -- Twitter
    @ccmexec

  • Clients cant download application from software center [ error : 0x87d00607 ]

    I've got a small SCCM 2012 deployment with about 3 clients , these three clients cant download application available on software center!
    i checked out my boundries and boundries group and they are well configured .
    help plz

    i have just a subnet configuration in my boundary so there's no association against the site in AD
    Houda
    Subnet or IP ranges? Best to configure with IP ranges. 
    http://blog.configmgrftw.com/ip-subnet-boundaries-still-evil/
    Cheers Paul | http://sccmentor.wordpress.com

  • 0x87D01280 "Virtual application is currently in use" error when uninstall App-V Office 2013 in Software Center

    Getting the above error message when attempting to uninstall Office 2013 App-V version (downloaded using ODT) in Software Center. There are no office 2013 or App-V processes showing as running in Task Manager. Nothing in event viewer to show what is running
    either. Any idea on what could be running and holding the uninstall from completing?

    Hello,
    These issues are caused if the virtual package is used during the attempt to uninstall.
    SFTMIME is a legacy command-line interface for App-V 4.6, not supported for usage with App-V 5 (which is the only version that supports Office 2013).
    App-V 5.0 SP2 has introduced the ability to divert required actions to next logoff / reboot depending on publishing, if the package is in use.
    See these articles;
    http://www.applepie.se/app-v-5-0-sp2-and-pending-removal-update
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/virtualvibes/archive/2013/12/03/pending-tasks-in-app-v-5-0-sp2.aspx
    Nicke Källén | The Knack| Twitter:
    @Znackattack

  • Applications not visible in Software Center

    Hello Guys,
    some Clients have Problems to show Application Deployments in Software Center. In Deployment Monitoring Tool I can see the Deployments. But if you select the Deployment I get the Error "DT cannot be empty". So I think the
    Policy isn't downloaded correctly.
    CIDownloader.log.
    CCIDownloadItem::AddToManifest - Starting download of DocumentType 2 for ModelName Windows/x64_Windows_Server_2008_R2_Core, Version 1 CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 5068 (0x13CC)
    CCIDownloadItem::AddToManifest - Starting download of DocumentType 1 for ModelName Windows/x86_Embedded_Windows_7, Version 2 CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 5068 (0x13CC)
    CCIDownloadItem::AddToManifest - Starting download of DocumentType 2 for ModelName Windows/x86_Embedded_Windows_7, Version 2 CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 5068 (0x13CC)
    CCIDownloadItem::AddToManifest - Starting download of CI content document with DocumentName urn:policy-platform:policy.microsoft.com:smlif:ms.dcm.Windows.x86_Windows_7_Client:1:VL, DocumentVersion 1 (VL) CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 5068 (0x13CC)
    CCIDownloader::ParseDtsMessage - Dts failed with error code: 0x80070002. CI Downloader will retry. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 4008 (0x0FA8)
    CIDownloaderJob({CFEBCEF0-7D16-421D-A53A-2A26F82CE5BF}): Received Dts failure message during CI download. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 4008 (0x0FA8)
    CIDownloaderJob({CFEBCEF0-7D16-421D-A53A-2A26F82CE5BF}): CCIDownloaderJob::QueueRetry - Consumed 5763 seconds of 172800 second download window. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 4008 (0x0FA8)
    CIDownloaderJob({CFEBCEF0-7D16-421D-A53A-2A26F82CE5BF}): CCIDownloaderJob::QueueRetry - Retrying package download in 2880 seconds... CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 4008 (0x0FA8)
    CCIDownloader::CreateJob CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CCIDownloader::StartJob CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIDownloader job empty. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CCIDownloader::DeleteJob for job {D10C1E70-D480-4C05-9C95-D4BCBECFD4F1} CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIDownloader job deleted. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgent.log
    CAgent::EvaluateCIs CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=Transition, CurrentState=Init) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): Client requesting CIAgentJob context info for key: StateMessagePriority CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): TransitionState(From=Init, To=WaitingForAssignedCI) for Event=Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): QueueDebug - Executing Event. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=Transition, CurrentState=WaitingForAssignedCI) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore DownloadCIs CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): QueueDebug - Executing Event. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=DownloadCIs, CurrentState=WaitingForAssignedCI) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): TransitionState(From=WaitingForAssignedCI, To=DownloadingCIs) for Event=Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): QueueDebug - Executing Event. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=Transition, CurrentState=DownloadingCIs) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): Client requesting CIAgentJob context info for key: PostRebootDetect CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): Nothing to be downloaded. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore PersistCIs CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): QueueDebug - Executing Event. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=PersistCIs, CurrentState=DownloadingCIs) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): TransitionState(From=DownloadingCIs, To=PersistingCIModels) for Event=Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::Execute [GlobalSemaphore] Trying to aquire global semaphore CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::Execute [GlobalSemaphore] Queued for global semaphore acquisition. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): GlobalJobEvent() called [GlobalSemaphore] CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::Execute [GlobalSemaphore] Acquired global semaphore. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=Transition, CurrentState=PersistingCIModels) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_0ddc3eb7-5ee3-41eb-9fed-646d28a06bcf:11. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_0ddc3eb7-5ee3-41eb-9fed-646d28a06bcf:11 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_0e9a8348-0ad5-44ee-bf81-82dfd44f0699:11. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_0e9a8348-0ad5-44ee-bf81-82dfd44f0699:11 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_10203df1-4fe4-49ef-8ab3-e8030e6a2cef:22. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_10203df1-4fe4-49ef-8ab3-e8030e6a2cef:22 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_1fc34d72-440d-4f6f-9a50-604e421f3c04:13. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_1fc34d72-440d-4f6f-9a50-604e421f3c04:13 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_2191a582-1987-40fd-b8ec-cbee1a2ba590:4, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_22778347-5967-4ee1-bdc0-3fce578b7ee1:2. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_22778347-5967-4ee1-bdc0-3fce578b7ee1:2 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_278d8ebe-16bc-49b7-a806-42025d921f84:6. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_278d8ebe-16bc-49b7-a806-42025d921f84:6 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_27c341d0-a38e-43c9-aeef-a82be7e1f664:1. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_27c341d0-a38e-43c9-aeef-a82be7e1f664:1 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_2bf3a7d7-27fc-4fe6-80ff-80c9adee89a8:5, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_33aa078b-9afa-48b3-9550-8d926c07721e:5. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_33aa078b-9afa-48b3-9550-8d926c07721e:5 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_3a41042c-4feb-421b-8b55-42334654681e:15, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_3be6a762-f993-4fe5-aca5-1989551d5a88:5. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_3be6a762-f993-4fe5-aca5-1989551d5a88:5 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_3c0b214a-2258-4765-be5d-d2a9fd754bc6:2. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_3c0b214a-2258-4765-be5d-d2a9fd754bc6:2 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_46f5d091-992c-4e24-b0a2-3de657c0b8c7:16, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_49337598-4c68-401e-8c39-a415288cd7d6:11. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_49337598-4c68-401e-8c39-a415288cd7d6:11 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_4da67baa-ac51-4327-bfdc-c8f81781ae62:20, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_4f0df4d7-e1d0-4717-b9e2-5f9cb6f1dd9b:8. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_4f0df4d7-e1d0-4717-b9e2-5f9cb6f1dd9b:8 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_5d895d54-10ea-447d-8b45-123b77e89721:4. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_5d895d54-10ea-447d-8b45-123b77e89721:4 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_636ad5b2-da09-439b-ac7c-d7895d728131:2. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_636ad5b2-da09-439b-ac7c-d7895d728131:2 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_665c56e0-626a-4d8d-9378-48a8c8546846:1. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_665c56e0-626a-4d8d-9378-48a8c8546846:1 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_666d662e-66f7-4e53-b4fd-06ccd55239bf:4. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_666d662e-66f7-4e53-b4fd-06ccd55239bf:4 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_6a39d117-9e22-4e11-8fcd-ebbf35b00688:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_6a39d117-9e22-4e11-8fcd-ebbf35b00688:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_6da53bf1-ab56-4a96-9af8-6df6d4b9972e:10. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_6da53bf1-ab56-4a96-9af8-6df6d4b9972e:10 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_70d0451a-94c0-4372-b19b-dd9e4246788f:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_70d0451a-94c0-4372-b19b-dd9e4246788f:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_716e6646-2efd-4d3a-9441-5563de429a01:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_716e6646-2efd-4d3a-9441-5563de429a01:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_77493905-3008-4862-bd89-d5fad3318cfc:41, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_77c479ff-bef7-456d-9bae-47ea1513e56f:4. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_77c479ff-bef7-456d-9bae-47ea1513e56f:4 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_7925a429-49b4-4b04-8094-4987ca70a35b:7. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_7925a429-49b4-4b04-8094-4987ca70a35b:7 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_79516c6a-a815-4c31-99fe-9ab4e4024e4e:1. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_79516c6a-a815-4c31-99fe-9ab4e4024e4e:1 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_7af21e61-ffe4-4791-85ba-86d83cc9cf31:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_7af21e61-ffe4-4791-85ba-86d83cc9cf31:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_7d5204c1-26e4-489e-addb-1401d965153f:8. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_7d5204c1-26e4-489e-addb-1401d965153f:8 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_7e5660da-b7c7-49dd-8940-7c751389f61a:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_7e5660da-b7c7-49dd-8940-7c751389f61a:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_85f4af90-a3f1-4d7e-bb6a-b079c20fa2d5:14. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_85f4af90-a3f1-4d7e-bb6a-b079c20fa2d5:14 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
    CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_8908c4aa-5c4e-41fd-a111-e4be0780e6bb:2. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/
    Is it possible to reset Software Center?

    This bug is still present in SCCM 2012 R2 CU3.
    Remediation script has been optimized and written in Powershell. It will trigger a refresh only if application is found in WMI class.
    If you deploy user-centric applications, you’ll need to change this code a little bit.
    # Machine
    $ErrorActionPreference = "Stop"
    try {
        [int]$countMissingDTs = 0
        $Applications = Get-WmiObject -namespace root\ccm\clientsdk -query "select * from ccm_application"
        $AppsTotal = $Applications.Length
        $missingIds = @()
        foreach($App in $Applications) {
            $AppDT = [wmi] $App.__Path
            if($AppDT.AppDTs.Name.Length -eq 0) {
                #Write-Host $($App.Id)
                $missingIds += $App.Id
                $countMissingDTs = $countMissingDTs + 1
        #Write-Host $countMissingDTs
        if ($countMissingDTs -gt 0) {
            foreach ($appId in $missingIds) {
                $assignments = Get-WmiObject -query "select AssignmentName, AssignmentId, AssignedCIs from CCM_ApplicationCIAssignment" -namespace "ROOT\ccm\policy\Machine"
                if ($assignments -ne $null) {
                    foreach ($assignment in $assignments) {
                        $assignedCI = $assignment.AssignedCIs[0]
                        #write-host "Processing Assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName) $($assignment.AssignmentId) $($assignedCI.CI.ID)"
                        $assignedCISplit = $assignedCI.CI.ID.Split("/")
                        #Write-Host $($assignedCISplit[0]+"/"+$assignedCISplit[1].replace("RequiredApplication", "Application"))
                        if ($($assignedCISplit[0]+"/"+$assignedCISplit[1].replace("RequiredApplication", "Application")) -eq $appId) {
                            #write-host "Processing Assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName) $($assignment.AssignmentId)"
                            $sched=([wmi]"root\ccm\Policy\machine\ActualConfig:CCM_Scheduler_ScheduledMessage.ScheduledMessageID='$($assignment.AssignmentId)'");
                            $sched.Triggers=@('SimpleInterval;Minutes=1;MaxRandomDelayMinutes=0');
                            $null = $sched.Put()
                            sleep -milliseconds 3000
                        } else {
                            #Write-Host "Skip assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName)"
                } else {
                    #Write-Host "$appId not found"
    } catch {
        #Write-Host $_.Exception
        return $false
    return $true
    User-centric application deployment:
    # User
    $ErrorActionPreference = "Stop"
    try {
        [int]$countMissingDTs = 0
        $Applications = Get-WmiObject -namespace root\ccm\clientsdk -query "select * from ccm_application"
        $AppsTotal = $Applications.Length
        $missingIds = @()
        foreach($App in $Applications) {
            $AppDT = [wmi] $App.__Path
            if($AppDT.AppDTs.Name.Length -eq 0) {
                #Write-Host $($App.Id)
                $missingIds += $App.Id
                $countMissingDTs = $countMissingDTs + 1
        #Write-Host $countMissingDTs
        if ($countMissingDTs -gt 0) {
            foreach ($appId in $missingIds) {
                $sidObjs = ( get-wmiobject -query "SELECT UserSID FROM CCM_UserLogonEvents WHERE LogoffTime = NULL" -namespace "ROOT\ccm")
                if ($sidObjs -ne $null) {
                    foreach ($sidObj in $sidObjs) {
                        $sid = $sidObj.UserSID.replace('-','_');
                        $assignments = Get-WmiObject -query "select AssignmentName, AssignmentId, AssignedCIs from CCM_ApplicationCIAssignment" -namespace "ROOT\ccm\policy\$($sid)"
                        if ($assignments -ne $null) {
                            foreach ($assignment in $assignments) {
                                $assignedCI = $assignment.AssignedCIs[0]
                                #write-host "Processing Assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName) $($assignment.AssignmentId) $($assignedCI.CI.ID)"
                                $assignedCISplit = $assignedCI.CI.ID.Split("/")
                                #Write-Host $($assignedCISplit[0]+"/"+$assignedCISplit[1].replace("RequiredApplication", "Application"))
                                if ($($assignedCISplit[0]+"/"+$assignedCISplit[1].replace("RequiredApplication", "Application")) -eq $appId) {
                                    #write-host "Processing Assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName) $($assignment.AssignmentId)"
                                    $sched=([wmi]"root\ccm\Policy\$sid\ActualConfig:CCM_Scheduler_ScheduledMessage.ScheduledMessageID='$($assignment.AssignmentId)'");
                                    $sched.Triggers=@('SimpleInterval;Minutes=1;MaxRandomDelayMinutes=0');
                                    $sched.Put()
                                    sleep -milliseconds 3000
                } else {
                    # Write-Host "$appId not found"
    } catch {
        # Write-Host $_.Exception
        return $false
    return $true

  • Software Center Application Uninstallation Button Greyed Out and Deploying an Application with Uninstall switch Fails

    Hi,
    I tried everything I could find on the internet but no luck so far. I can successfully deploy MS Visio 2013 to the clients. I also want to be able to uninstall it from the clients. On the client machine Uninstall button is greyed out. This deployment is
    installed as "Available" and there is only one deployment type within that MS Visio 2013 Application.
    I tried the following uninstall commands in my deployment:
    setup.exe /uninstall
    setup.exe /uninstall
    VisPro
    /config .\vispro.ww\uninstallvisio.xml
    “\\SRVSCCM2012\Sources\MSApplications\MSVisioPro_2013_64Bit_ENG\setup.exe” /uninstall VisPro /config "\\SRVSCCM2012\Sources\MSApplications\MSVisioPro_2013_64Bit_ENG\vispro.ww\uninstallvisio.xml"
    \\SRVSCCM2012\Sources\MSApplications\MSVisioPro_2013_64Bit_ENG\setup.exe /uninstall VisPro /config \\SRVSCCM2012\Sources\MSApplications\MSVisioPro_2013_64Bit_ENG\vispro.ww\uninstallvisio.xml
    I checked Product ID from Setup.xml and I know it is correct. My uninstallvisio.xml' content is below:
    <Configuration Product="VisPro">
    <Display Level="basic" CompletionNotice="yes" SuppressModal="yes" AcceptEula="yes" />
    <Setting Id="SETUP_REBOOT" Value="Never" />
    </Configuration>
    Last night, I downloaded and installed Cumulative Update 1 for SCCM 2012 R2 and I haven't tried the deployment after the update,yet. I will try it today but please let me know what else to check.
    Yavuz Selim Atmaca

    After I updated SCCM Server and test client pc with CU1 , I tried to deploy visio as Required. It installed successfully. Then I uninstalled visio by deploying the application with Uninstall Action.
    After that I tried to deploy visio as "Available" to see if Software Center Uninstall button works. However visio deployment does not come to Software Center's Available Applications List. I check the status of the deployment under the Deployments monitoring
    node and it says Success "Already Compliant". I dont know what it means. Does config manager thinks that visio already installed?
    Yavuz Selim Atmaca
    2 or 3 hours later that -Succes "Already Compliant"- status of the deployment under the Deployments monitoring node is vanished automatically and Software Center application list showed the new deployment. I installed it and  uninstalled it succesfully.
    So, you are right Solution is the CU1 but I am still wondering why my available deployment took so time to be visible in Software Center althought I didn't enter any schedule to be available.
    Yavuz Selim Atmaca

  • Orphaned Applications in software center

    I have seen this a few times but seems to be intermittent.  I created a query based user collection.  My test user account was part of that collection.  I deployed an app to the collection.  The user was able to see it in the app catalog
    and install it successfully.  The user then uninstalled the app successfully.  The app stills shows in Software Center as available (which appears to be normal although I wish the behavior would be that it would disappear).  But that's not the
    issue.  So I no longer wanted the user to be able to deploy this application that they previously installed and uninstalled.  Since it is a query based collection which the user should be in, I added an exclude collection that just had the user account
    in it  which seemed to work fine.  The exclusion collection caused my test user account to drop out of the collection.  After a few minutes, the app dropped out of the app catalog which is good and what I expected.  The problem here is
    that the app still remains in Software Center and shows as available and the user can still continue to install and uninstall this app.  I have forced user policy several times with no change and let it sit for a few hours with still no change.  As
    a test I then removed all membership from the collection so that it was completely empty.  Still no change.  I then deleted the collection and the deployment and still no change.  I have also forced machine policy and application deployment
    evaluation cycles and still no change. I have ensured that there are no other deployments of this app, it is not a dependent app of any other app either.  So I am left with an app that I can still install/uninstall from software center with no existing
    deployments of that app.  Other times I have done similar and the app does disappear from Software Center after updating user policy.  But definitely once or twice in the past I have seen this behavior as well.  In the past I believe I removed
    and re-installed the configmgr client to get rid of the orphaned apps.  I have not done that yet this time in the hopes of troubleshooting further.  Has anyone ran into anything like this? 

    Thanks, but I am the person that originally posted that issue.  This issue is similar but much worse.  That one was just a nuisance in that the apps remain available in software center after you have performed an uninstall.  But to workaround
    that problem I would have to somehow get the user out of the collection that was targeted with the deployment and that usually got the app to drop out of software center.  In this case however, the app remains even after deleting the collection and the
    deployment.  So this app is no longer deployed to anyone but the user with the app orphaned in software center can still install and uninstall it.  I even cleared the cache on the user machine thinking that would at least cause it to fail to install
    next time but the user was able to re-download content and install again.  So to me this one is much more serious than the first one.  I will have to file another case.  But curious if anyone else has seen this and for now if anyone has a workaround
    like perhaps finding the policy and deleting it or something that I can script.  Just started poking through policy spy but have not gotten far yet.

  • Endless waiting for the windows support software to download

    absolutely uncomfortable speed when windows support software drivers downloading
    it seems to take a few days!!!
    ohhh, that expensive big data center...
    has anyone same problem?

    Go to the BootCamp community and read about how many have the same problem.
    https://discussions.apple.com/community/windows_software/boot_camp
    Apple really doesn't want you to use Windows and only cranked up BootCamp to ward off the hackers who would have done it anyway like the "Hackintosh".

  • Which ports are used by LMS 4.2.5 Software Center

    Hi everybody!
    we are trying to download device updates and packages via the software center of lms 4.2.5. but get the attached error msg.
    Which ports are used for the download (for firewall configuration)
    I can't find the used ports for this function in the install guide.....
    I am very thankful for any suggestions!
    Edit:
    here is the log output:
    [ Sun Jan 04 00:30:01 CET 2015 ] ERROR  [CcoDownloadAdapter : getXmlFileList]  : failed to connect to Cisco.com:RespCode=302, RespMsg=Found
    [ Sun Jan 04 00:30:01 CET 2015 ] INFO   [SecurityHandler : getCSProxyHost]  : No proxy Host configured
    [ Sun Jan 04 00:30:01 CET 2015 ] INFO   [SecurityHandler : getCSProxyPort]  : No proxy port confgured
    [ Sun Jan 04 00:30:01 CET 2015 ] ERROR  [CcoDownloadAdapter : getXmlFileList]  : failed to connect to Cisco.com:RespCode=302, RespMsg=Found
    [ Mon Jan 05 00:30:01 CET 2015 ] ERROR  [CcoDownloadAdapter : getXmlFileList]  : failed to connect to Cisco.com:RespCode=302, RespMsg=Found
    [ Mon Jan 05 00:30:01 CET 2015 ] INFO   [SecurityHandler : getCSProxyHost]  : No proxy Host configured
    [ Mon Jan 05 00:30:01 CET 2015 ] INFO   [SecurityHandler : getCSProxyPort]  : No proxy port confgured
    [ Mon Jan 05 00:30:01 CET 2015 ] ERROR  [CcoDownloadAdapter : getXmlFileList]  : failed to connect to Cisco.com:RespCode=302, RespMsg=Found
    there is no proxy in use, so the is none configured :)

    Hi,
    Looks like you are encountering this BUG
    CSCur85172    Unable to installing the device packages from cisco.com using LMS Server
    Try this to resolve the issue::
    Stop Daemon Manager
    2.            Change the protocol 'http' to 'https' for the below URL's in vds.properties
    file located under /NMSROOT/lib/classpath/com/cisco/nm/xms/vds/.
    NGCcoScript=http://tools.cisco.com/software/catalog/swcs/softwaremetadata
    NGCcoImageScript=http://tools.cisco.com/software/catalog/swcs/image
    TO
    NGCcoScript=https://tools.cisco.com/software/catalog/swcs/softwaremetadata
    NGCcoImageScript=https://tools.cisco.com/software/catalog/swcs/image
    3.            Start the Daemon Manager.
    Thanks-
    Afroz
    ****Ratings Encourages Contributors ****

  • Client's Software Center is Empty

    Hi everyone,
    I have been working on an issue here for a couple of weeks and cannot figure it out.  Our clients are no longer getting an updated list of available programs when they access they look at the Software Center.  This is most obvious with new
    clients that have just been added or with rebuilt systems.  I have checked dozens of different logs and settings and have reinstalled the client on a number of machines to no avail.  I have run the SCCM 2012 R2 configuration analyzer, but
    it didn't tell me anything.  Reinstallations of the SCCM Client did not resolve this issue, nor did a fresh installation.  This particular system has been upgraded a few times, so it is possible something broke during an update recently.
    Has anyone had this issue as well?  Does anyone have any recommended things to check?

    I opened the logs in "C:\Program files\Microsoft Configuration Manager\Logs", "C:\Program files\SMS_CCM\Logs\" as well as the inetpub logs and found these errors that might mean something.  I could not find any of the Site Server
    logs listed in that link on our server.
    P.S. I forgot to mention that it is running SCCM 2012 R2 CU4.
    MP_Status (repeat events) - Mp Status: processing event: SMS_SUMScanAgentError_ScanFailed, for machine: SITE-LAB-23 MP_StatusManager 2/18/2015 1:40:30 PM 4320 (0x10E0)
    MP_Policy (Every rows contains the same thing)- Detected at least one row in the result set from PolicyAssignment table which does not have a Signature, rejecting all rows. MP_PolicyManager 2/19/2015 10:51:09 AM 1616 (0x0650)
    MP_GetPolicy (This entry is calling for existing Package IDs)- MP IP: Policy ID=DIV2005F-DIV00026-4B929717 Version=614.00 not found MP_GetPolicy_ISAPI 2/18/2015 2:08:31 PM 7164 (0x1BFC)CProcessPolicyBlobRequest::GetPolicyBlobFromDatabase():
    QueryDatabaseForBlob() failed MP_GetPolicy_ISAPI 2/18/2015 2:08:31 PM 1520 (0x05F0)
    CCM - ---> WNetAddConnection2 failed (LOGON32_LOGON_NEW_CREDENTIALS) using account HFCRD37\svc_TheAccount (00000035) SMS_CLIENT_CONFIG_MANAGER 2/19/2015 10:00:25 AM 6936 (0x1B18)
    CCM - ---> ERROR: Unable to access target machine for request: "2097153677", machine name: "SITE-CART4-22",  access denied or invalid network path. SMS_CLIENT_CONFIG_MANAGER 2/19/2015 10:00:47 AM 6936 (0x1B18)
    SMSWRITERLOG - *** [08001][-2146893051][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 10.0]A network-related or instance-specific error has occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. Server is not found or not accessible. Check if instance name is correct
    and if SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. For more information see SQL Server Books Online. SMS_SITE_VSS_WRITER 6/14/2014 11:43:30 PM 1548 (0x060C)
    DISTMGR - Failed to process package DIV00037 after 46 retries, will retry 54 more times SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 2/19/2015 10:19:32 AM 4672 (0x1240)
    CERTMGR - Failed to get connector certificate SMS_CERTIFICATE_MANAGER 2/19/2015 8:44:46 AM 4576 (0x11E0)
    PATCHDOWNLOADER - Failed to create directory
    \\TheServer\sccm_updates$\6d8590bd-038e-4455-9764-30875ccbf0c7.1\, error 5 Software Updates Patch Downloader 11/6/2012 11:14:49 AM 5092 (0x13E4)
    SMSDBMON - Warning: Could not create file C:\Program Files\Microsoft Configuration Manager\inboxes\ccr.box\308202F5308201DDA003020102021015834949D30B51824A6B1FAAA17B7667300D06092A864886F70D01010B05003016311430120603550403130B53697465205365727665723020170D3132313032333136343734395A180F32313132303933303136343734395A3016311430120603550403130B5369746520536572766572.CPC,
    Error=3. SMS_DATABASE_NOTIFICATION_MONITOR 2/19/2015 9:58:48 AM 4620 (0x120C)
    SMSDPMON - Failed to create certificate store from encoded certificate..
    An error occurred during encode or decode operation. (Error: 80092002; Source: Windows) SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring 11/5/2012 2:18:42 PM 3008 (0x0BC0)

  • Two specific software patches hung in Software Center

    I have never seen this before and can't find any google hits on it. I have one client on which two specific Microsoft patches seem hung. This has been going on for two days. Yesterday I manually installed these patches and I can tell my version numbers
    that they worked. When I've done this before, the patches would clear out of Software Center because it'd detect they were installed. But on this one client, I just watched this client pull 3rd party updates and Microsoft updates and install them. After the
    reboot, it's still trying to pull the two patches I installed manually and stays at "downloading (0% complete). I tried clearing the SCCM cache but that didn't help. Suggestions?
    Ben JohnsonWY

    Hi,
    The client might need some time to apply deployment policy.
    About downloading (0% complete), you could check CAS.log, ContentTransferManager.log and DataTransferService.log to find more information.
    Best Regards,
    Joyce
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Available Package Deployments not showing in Software Center of Domain Controller Clients

    We have a SCCM 2012 R2 environment and have a pretty weird issue. I have deployed multiple 'available' software packages to a collection. The non-domain controller client receives the deployments and I can run them successfully, however the domain controller
    shows nothing in the software center. But in the PolicyAgent.log of the domain controller I can see it getting the policy:
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_PolicyDownloadSucceeded
    ClientID = "GUID:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX";
    DateTime = "20141002163132.946000+000";
    DownloadMethod = "BITS";
    DownloadSource = "https://XXXXXXXX.XXX.local/SMS_MP/.sms_pol?HHS20013-HHS0002D-XXXXXXXXX";
    PolicyNamespace = "\\\\.\\ROOT\\ccm\\policy\\Machine\\RequestedConfig";
    PolicyPath = "CCM_Policy_Policy5.PolicyID=\"XXX20013-XXX0002D-8C28365A\",PolicySource=\"SMS:XXX\",PolicyVersion=\"1.00\"";
    ProcessID = 1484;
    ThreadID = 4632;
    PolicyAgent_PolicyDownload
    10/2/2014 12:31:32 PM 4632 (0x1218)
    What can I check?

    I am seeing the following in the PolicyEvaluator.log:
    Updating policy CCM_Policy_Policy5.PolicyID="HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A",PolicySource="SMS:HHS",PolicyVersion="1.00"
    PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator 10/3/2014 11:42:40 AM
    7092 (0x1BB4)
    Applying policy HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator
    10/3/2014 11:42:40 AM 7092 (0x1BB4)
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_PolicyRuleRevoked
    ClientID = "GUID:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX";
    DateTime = "20141003154242.730000+000";
    PolicyID = "HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A";
    PolicyNamespace = "\\\\.\\ROOT\\ccm\\policy\\Machine\\RequestedConfig";
    PolicySource = "SMS:HHS";
    PolicyVersion = "1.00";
    ProcessID = 5324;
    RuleCondition = "{6A383AEC-DA01-44CC-88AC-EE7CBBC9CA6F}";
    RuleID = "{59aae67e-4ae4-476a-8aa9-1e0fef74275d}";
    ThreadID = 7092;
    PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator
    10/3/2014 11:42:42 AM 7092 (0x1BB4)
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_PolicyRuleRevoked
    ClientID = "GUID:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX";
    DateTime = "20141003154244.075000+000";
    PolicyID = "HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A";
    PolicyNamespace = "\\\\.\\ROOT\\ccm\\policy\\Machine\\RequestedConfig";
    PolicySource = "SMS:HHS";
    PolicyVersion = "1.00";
    ProcessID = 5324;
    RuleCondition = "{73EEC40F-921F-400C-8DAD-9985B6FF9EA0}";
    RuleID = "{a82507ac-d123-4e58-b7e8-e7e3e1c14ef9}";
    ThreadID = 7092;
    PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator
    10/3/2014 11:42:44 AM 7092 (0x1BB4)
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_PolicyRuleApplied
    ClientID = "GUID:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX";
    DateTime = "20141003154245.460000+000";
    PolicyID = "HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A";
    PolicyNamespace = "\\\\.\\ROOT\\ccm\\policy\\Machine\\RequestedConfig";
    PolicySource = "SMS:HHS";
    PolicyVersion = "1.00";
    ProcessID = 5324;
    RuleCondition = "{735BB0FE-157C-4969-B253-413FB85A928C}";
    RuleID = "{4d354de9-ad9c-4588-b772-7d48405934f2}";
    ThreadID = 7092;
    PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator
    10/3/2014 11:42:45 AM 7092 (0x1BB4)
    Applied policy CCM_Policy_Policy5.PolicyID="HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A",PolicySource="SMS:HHS",PolicyVersion="1.00"
    PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator 10/3/2014 11:42:45 AM
    7092 (0x1BB4)
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluationComplete
    ClientID = "GUID:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX";
    DateTime = "20141003154245.470000+000";
    PolicyNamespace = "\\\\.\\ROOT\\ccm\\policy\\Machine\\RequestedConfig";
    PolicyPath = "CCM_Policy_Policy5.PolicyID=\"HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A\",PolicySource=\"SMS:HHS\",PolicyVersion=\"1.00\"";
    ProcessID = 5324;
    ThreadID = 7092;
    PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator
    10/3/2014 11:42:45 AM 7092 (0x1BB4)
    Policy state for [CCM_Policy_Policy5.PolicyID="HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A",PolicyVersion="1.00",PolicySource="SMS:HHS"] is currently [Active]
    PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator 10/3/2014 11:42:45 AM
    1820 (0x071C)
    Updating settings in \\.\root\ccm\policy\machine\actualconfig
    PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator 10/3/2014 11:42:45 AM
    1820 (0x071C)
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_SettingsEvaluationComplete
    ClientID = "GUID:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX";
    DateTime = "20141003154302.533000+000";
    PolicyNamespace = "\\\\.\\root\\ccm\\policy\\machine\\actualconfig";
    ProcessID = 5324;
    ThreadID = 1820;
    PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator
    10/3/2014 11:43:02 AM 1820 (0x071C)
    Policies are downloaded and evaluated for the reply of correlation guid {9985950D-3E04-40E5-81FD-8E2BCBE0DB25}
    PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator 10/3/2014 11:43:02 AM
    1820 (0x071C)

  • Applications with two deployment types makes uninstall button in software center "greyed" out.

    Hi
    SCCM 2012 R2 running on Windows server 2012 with Windows 7 clients.
    We are publishing applications to users that are available (not required), so that they can be downloaded from the application catalog web site. We have som applications that needs more then one deployment type (different pre requirements depending
    on OS architecture) and when I create two deployment types for one Application the uninstall button in Software center is greyed out? If i remove one of the deployment types so there is just one, well then the Uninstall button is available again.
    An example is Itunes. I publish one Itunes application to the store that has two deployment types, one for X86 and another for X64 with requirments on OS architetcure. the correct version gets installed but the uninstall button is not possible to use. If
    i remove one of the deployment types then the deployment button is not greyed out.
    Is this a bug?
    Thanks everyone. 

    We will be installing CU3 this Friday. During the next week or so, I will deploy the CU3 client to the workstations.
    I do not believe that the uninstall button issue will be addressed with this update either, according to what I have read so far.
    If, by some small yet profound miracle, my uninstall button regains full functionality, I will gladly let all of you know.
    I would hope that Microsoft would address this issue seriously, as I am sure the rumblings of dissatisfaction are beginning to grow louder with each passing CU that ignores the problem.

Maybe you are looking for

  • CURSOR_ALREADY_OPEN and SYS_REFCURSOR

    Hi, I have noticed that you can open a sys_refcursor without closing it. A co-worker did it in a function and I complained it was not good practice and it would raise an error, but he told me I was wrong. I have tested it and it has worked, so I have

  • Report generation: server execution failed

    the app has been running for months. IS dept just upgraded machines and software. NT4.0 is now Win2000 and Office 97 is now Office2000. Report generation tool kit is not happy. Even running NI examples I get error -2146959355 server execution failed

  • Selection of Costing Sheet in Production Order

    Hi friends, I have one query, details of which are as  follows. Costing sheet in Requirement Class - Blank This requirement class assigned to Requirement type which was derived in Sales order through Material master and hence Costing sheet in Sales o

  • How to use Time Format with decimal to calculate races cars. ss,ddd ?

    In excell there are a user defined format MM:SS.000 very convenient to use in races with decimal precision. So in a race car we can have lap times like Car 1 - 1:23.234 Car 2 - 1:23.132 so the diference can be calculate and the result is 0.102. But i

  • Jre vs jvm

    Hey i m little bit confused that what is JVM and what is JRE?