Sol 7 to sol 8, back to sol 7

successfully loaded solaris 8 on a netra t1 - system prviously had solaris 7. needed to go back to solaris 7, and now cdrom has error reading certain files from CD. CD is readable on other netra systems with solaris 7 and solaris 8.
any suggestings? are some PROM settings changed??
Thanks,
--Kevin                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

What type of netra did you load Solaris 7 on?
netra T1 (AC200)?
netra T1 (100/105)?
Chris

Similar Messages

  • My computer crashed and I did a complete restore.Is there any way to get my bookmarks back if I have never done a backup of them? Or am I just SOL and need to start backing up now? I also lost my saved themes.

    I was previously registered w/ Firefox.

    Profile is a folder which store all your personal data in a safe place
    * https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Profiles
    * here explain how to backup profile https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Backing%20up%20your%20information
    * here explain how to restore it
    https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Recovering%20important%20data%20from%20an%20old%20profile

  • How to Migrate Sol 8/SDS 4.2 Raid 1 disks to Sol 10 VM

    I have a system running Solaris 8 with S/w mirrorring of the system & data disks that has to have the O/S upgraded to Solaris 10. Due to the size of a couple of system mount pts it looks like I'll have to do the Solaris 10 initial install option and either combine these smaller partitions back into root or expand them for Solaris 10. Do I have to undo the mirrors & concat/stripes I already have before going to Solaris 10 (just on the system disk and/or the data disk) in order to use Sol 10's VM?

    I have a system running Solaris 8 with S/w mirrorring of the system & data disks that has to have the O/S upgraded to Solaris 10. Due to the size of a couple of system mount pts it looks like I'll have to do the Solaris 10 initial install option and either combine these smaller partitions back into root or expand them for Solaris 10. Do I have to undo the mirrors & concat/stripes I already have before going to Solaris 10 (just on the system disk and/or the data disk) in order to use Sol 10's VM?

  • I have an iPad mini and water has been spilled on it all over! So I'm wondering can it be fixed? I don't have a warranty as I got it as a gift am I sol?

    My I pad mini had a lot of water spilled on it! So now is it toast?? Can it be replaced? I don't have a warranty on it because I got it as a Christmas present. Am I SOL?? If so can you please tell me how do I get my pictures that are on there? I have iCloud yes and in that also my iPhone can never be backed up apparently my iPad has taken all the storage? How do I get to my pictures?? Can my iPad be fixed?? Please help! I'm new to these products! HELP!

    Service Answer Center - iPad - http://support.apple.com/kb/index?page=servicefaq&geo=US&product=ipad  <-- enter correct country in drag-down menu once on page.
    Had you activated Photo Stream?
    Photo Stream - http://www.apple.com/icloud/features/photo-stream.html
    iCloud: Photo Stream FAQ - http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4486 - "With Photo Stream, when you take photos on an iOS device or import photos from your digital camera to your computer, your new photos will be automatically uploaded to iCloud and pushed to all your other devices. You can also view the photos in your Photo Stream with Apple TV."

  • Siteinfo.sol file path too long

    Hopefully someone here can help with this problem. First, I'm
    running Windows XP Pro. Every night I do an automatic backup of my
    C: drive to an external hard drive (Maxtor) using Maxtor's backup
    software, EMC Retrospect Express HD 2.0. However, the backup quits
    when it tries to write a particular Flash file because the file
    path is too long. The file at the end of the path is siteInfo.sol
    and it is in a folder that is nested within 13 other folders. The
    file path is:
    C:/Documents and Settings/[my username]/Application
    Data/Macromedia/Flash Player/#Shared
    Objects/5WGFZ2N2/assets.cobalnitra.com/teams/repository/export/535/e93087b291004840/b0003 ba76d6c7/535e9308/7b291004840b0003ba76d6c7.swf
    From the "teams" folder on down through the nesting, there
    are no other files in any of the folders. The simplest solution
    would be to delete the "teams" folder, and thus all of the folders
    within it and the siteInfo.sol file, but I need to know if these
    folders (from "teams" on down) and this file are necessary for the
    operation of Flash Player. If they are, does anyone have another
    solution? I could go into the backup program and manually designate
    that every folder and file on my C: drive other than these be
    backed up, but that's a pain. I would love to call Adobe technical
    support, but there is no phone support for the free version of
    Flash Player.
    Thanks in advance for any help that anyone can provide.
    Todd Serota

    Todd,
    This is a Flash Shared Object that was written to your
    machine by cobalnitra.com. It's like a 'cookie' inside of Flash.
    You can safely get rid of it, though you might lose perhaps some
    saved game settings (or something saved by cobalnitra.com).
    Basically if that site is something you use a lot and does
    something important to you, then keep it. Otherwise you can delete
    everything under the #Shared Objects folder.

  • Booting from alternate disk in Sol 10 x86 1/06

    Hey all--
    I'm trying to set up a mirrored root filesystem on an x86 box with two IDE disks. It's running solaris 10 1/06. I've done this plenty of times on sparc boxes, but only once on an x86 box and after the metaroot, I had to edit bootenv.rc to point back to the "first" disk to get it to boot. That was with an older Solaris 10 release.
    I'm reading what I think is conflicting information from the SVM doc in the Solaris 10 book at docs.sun.com, various blog entries ( like this one from Mr Jelinek -- http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/jerrysblog?entry=solaris_volume_manager_x86_root ) and I'm confused now.
    My main question is, do I need to manually put bootblocks on the second drive? My disks appear to have identical x86 partitioning as well as Solaris partitioning, and don't contain the now-deprecated x86 boot partition.
    Page 126 of the current (12/05) SVM manual says:
    You must specify slice 2 of the disk as the device, and slice 2 must comprise the
    entire disk.
    # installboot /usr/platform/i86pc/lib/fs/ufs/pboot \
    /usr/platform/i86pc/lib/fs/ufs/bootblk /dev/rdsk/c1t1d0s2but.. pboot appears to be missing in the latest Solaris 10 release.
    So does anyone know what the current situation is? Do you need to put bootblocks on the second disk in the latest Solaris 10? And if so, how? :) thanks!

    bad 12/05 SVM manual..bad! :)
    If I had done the RTFM thing like one is supposed to, I would have seen this bit of information:
    # man installboot
         The installboot utility is a SPARC only program. It  is  not
         supported   on   the    architecture.    users   should  use
         installgrub(1M) instead.I assume "the architecture" here could be better written as "the x86 architecture" :)
    and of course, this makes sense, since the Sol 10 x86 1/06 release clearly boots with GRUB. I suppose I should also get my learn on for the other binaries:
    # man -k grub
    bootadm         bootadm (1m)    - manage bootability of GRUB-enabled operating system
    grub            grub (5)        - GRand Unified Bootloader software on Solaris
    installgrub     installgrub (1m)    - install GRUB in a disk partition or a floppyI'll confirm boot-ability later today when I take the machine into the lab. But I think I'm on the right track.
    This is a great forum and I've learned a lot by reading it. many thanks to all the posters!

  • SQL 2005 Authentication for Sol Man 4.0

    Hi,
    I have used the SQL4SAP.VBS to install SQL 2005 Entp Ed for Sol Man 4.0.
    I do not know what authentication  mode has been setup by this script
    How do I know this ?
    How can i change the mode to mixed mode as reuqired by Sol Man 4.0
    I havent started the SAP Inst yet .
    Thanks
    Uday

    Hi,
    This is how you need to check.
    1.      In the Enterprise Manager, select the server and then choose Action ® Properties.
    The SQL Server Properties dialog box opens.
           2.      Select the Security tab.
    Here you can see. Hope this solves your problem. Feel free to revert back.
    --Ragu

  • Sol 2.6 (Intel) install won't recognize more than 8GB of my hard drive

    <also posted under the 'Intel platform' topic>
    I am trying furiously to install Sol 2.6 on a Dell PC that has a 40GB hard drive. I DOS Fdisk to create one huge partition, which fdisk makes active. When I get to "customize fdisk Partitions for disk" in the
    install program, it shows me:
    1 Other 39070
    2 <unused>
    3 <unused>
    4 <unused>
    Capacity: 8001 MB
    Alocated: 39079 MB
    Rounding error: -31078 MB
    Free: 0 MB
    To create partitions, it forces you to delete the "Other" partition first. When I do this, Solaris declares that my disk is now 8001 MB, not 39079 MB.
    Due to problems with installing a network card (somewhat desirable for a UNIX operating system), I have gone through this install about 30 times in the last 3 days. At least once, I think I managed to trick
    it into using the entire disk, and letting me create the large file systems I need. But I can't get back there now.
    Does anyone know how to work around this?

    I have the same problem. I can't power up any more than 3 firewire devices or my imac kicks them all off. I have 2 Lacie drives piggybacked on the 800 port and then a powered firewire hub plugged into the 400 port. I can have either another firewire external HD OR an external Cd/Dvd recorder plugged into the hub. If I try both ( or any combination of 2 firewire devices) - the imac kicks everything off firewire, both on the 800 port and the 400 port. All my devices have their own external power supply.
    This is a bummer for me. I migrated from a G5 2GB duo with 4 external HDs and an 2nd external DVD writer. My drives are 2 1Ts, a 800 GB and a 400 GB. I do a lot of photography and video editing so I really need the external space. I guess this imac really isn't a Pro model but I didn't need any more speed so I wanted to save the space and money. I think Apple should say up-front that there are significant limits to the Firewire capabilities.
    Are any of you you able to attach 4 firewire devices at one time? If so, then I guess my machine is defective! Please let me know.
    Thanks,

  • Nevada: SOL & Old Charge Off

    Hey all, and pardon me in advance for my ignorance.
    Long long time lurker, minimal poster.
    I have a U.S. Bank C/O which was charged off in 12/2011.
    On myfico it only shows my payment history back to 1/2010, in which it hasn't been paid. I left US BANK I'm sure in 2008/early2009 when I advanced my Career and switched to USAA.
    My credit reports show an estimated "Fall Off" date as May 2016 for one bureau and July 2016 for another.
    My question is, if the first date of delinquency is in fact within, 2009, with Nevada having a 6 year SOL, Shouldn't it be falling off of my reports this year in 2015?
    I've been gearing up for a mortgage in early 2016 and going over my credit reports this was brought back up to my attention. Should I contact the OC and get the exact DOFD? The Credit bureaus? myFICO only goes back to 1/2010 and my last payment was before that date.
    Any responses are appreciated.

    SOL only determines how long you can be sued in court, no bearing on reporting. Report time is 7.5 years max for a charge off or collection.p

  • How to check whether my sol man installation is on sol man 7.0 or?

    Hellol All,
    Can anyone help me How to check whether my sol man installation is on sol man 7.0 or sol man 7.0 EHP1.
    Thank you,
    Srihari

    Hi,
    Your system status should tell you that. Any logged in screen of your solution manager system --> Status. Component Version should be as "SAP EHP 1 for SAP Solution Manager 7.0" to be Ehp1 or "SAP Solution Manager 7.0"
    Hope this answers your question.
    Feel free to revert back.
    -=-Ragu

  • Sol Man_Project administration

    Dear friends,
      I am using Sol Man 4.0. In t.code SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN, under "system landscape" tab, under sub tab, "Systems", i am finding two icons namely,
    1. Select scenario
    2.Shipment routes
    What is the main functionality of these options?
    In what way it helps for our business?
    Thanks
    Senthil

    Hello Senthil,
    1. <i>Select scenario</i> means:
    Have SAP Solution Manager determine the respective logical components for your business scenarios as selected in the business blueprint (SOLAR01) - based on the product versions these scenarios require (such as ECC 5.0 or CRM 6.0). This option is usually chosen if the project teams is not quite sure at the project start what kind of products and components are the right ones for operating certain scenarios.
    To test the effect of this option: You can first go into SOLAR01, select scenarios from the Business Process Repository and save your selection and then go back into SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN and hit this button.
    2. <i>Shipment routes</i> are necessary in the context of change request management:
    Transport routes basically define the path along which a change will be transported from DEV -> QAS -> PRD. This is used for instance in status tracking alongside your transport routes.
    For more information you can check out the online documentation such as:
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm40/helpdata/en/45/51fbdbd4941803e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm">http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm40/helpdata/en/45/51fbdbd4941803e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm</a>
    on Implementing ... -> Projects -> Project Administration (and respective tab) and
    Change Request Management.
    Best regards,
    Doreen

  • Does anyone know what the Sol is in Texas?

    I am wondering what the SOL is in Texas?

    The SOL is 4 years in TX and the DOFD is usually the first time it hits 30 days late and is not brought back current

  • HT4528 my iphone 4 loses contacts randomly and its not just my phone, i know several people with iphone4 who this happen to, is there a fix or am I sol?

    Is this fixable or am I sol? I have lost some very important contact information.. anyone?

    There are quite a few instances of this happening with ios 5.1. If you are using this version you shoud update! To get the contacts back you could try logging into icloud.com and see if the contacts were saved there.

  • "ludowngrade" - Sol 8 root filesystem trashed after mounting on Sol 10?

    I've been giving liveupgrade a shot and it seems to work well for upgrading Sol 8 to Sol 10 until a downgrade / rollback is attempted.
    To make a long story short, luactivating back to the old Sol 8 instance doesn't work because I haven't figured out a way to completely unencapsulate the Sol 8 SVM root metadevice without completely removing all SVM metadevices and metadbs from the system before the luupgrade, and we can only reboot once, to activate the newupgrade.
    This leaves the old Sol 8 root filesystem metadevice around after the upgrade (even though it is not mounted anywhere). After an luactivate back to the Sol 8 instance, something gets set wrong and the 5.8 kernel panics with all kinds of undefined symbol errors.
    Which leaves me no choice but to reboot in Solaris 10, and mount the old Solaris 8 filesystem, then edit the Sol 8 /etc/system and vfstab files to boot off a plain, non-SVM root filesystem.
    Here's the problem: Once I have mounted the Old Sol 8 filesystem in Sol 10, it fails fsck when booting Sol 8;
    /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.
    # fsck /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0
    BAD SUPERBLOCK AT BLOCK 16: BAD VALUES IN SUPER BLOCK
    LOOK FOR ALTERNATE SUPERBLOCKS WITH MKFS? y
    USE ALTERNATE SUPERBLOCK? y
    FOUND ALTERNATE SUPERBLOCK AT 32 USING MKFS
    CANCEL FILESYSTEM CHECK? n
    Fortunately, recovering the alternate superblock makes the filesystem usable in Sol 8 again. Is this supposed to happen?
    The only thing I can think of is I have logging enabled on the root FS in Sol 10, so apparently logging trashes the superblock in Sol 10 such that the FS cannot be mounted in Sol 8 without repair.
    Better yet would be a HOWTO on how to luupgrade a root filesystem encapsulated in SVM without removing the metadevices first. It seems impossible since without any fiddling, all the LU instances on the host will share the SVM metadb's on the system, which leads to problems.

    Did you upgrade the version of powerpath to a release supported on Solaris 10?

  • Sol-8 cant ping host on hme1

    ultra-10 running sol 8 with three network interfaces installed (hme0,hme1,hme2). ifconfig -a indicates all three are up, but I cannot rsh or ping hosts on hme1 or hme2 unless I ifconfig hme0 down.

    Your configurations are not making much sense.
    You have the same vlan interfaces with the same IP addresses on all devices and multiple static routes for 192.168.1.0/24.
    This is what you should change -
    1) the clients only connect to MSHQ3 so remove all vlan interfaces off all the other switches for the client vlans.
    Also remove the server vlan interface off MSHQ3
    2) the server vlan only connects to MSHQ4 so remove the server vlan off all other switches and remove all the client vlan interfaces off MSHQ4
    3) interconnect all your switches with L3 links because you are routing vlans locally on MSHQ3 and MSHQ4 so there is no need for any L2 links between switches.
    Note also in a true routed design MSHQ3 should not connect to MSHQ4 ie. traffic between those devices goes via MSHQ1 and MSHQ2
    4) remove all static routes for 192.168.1.0/24 from all devices
    5) run OSPF on all devices and only advertise the locally connected subnets off each device.
    For the switch interconnects use new IP subnets, don't reuse any of your existing vlan subnets.
    If you do all of the above then you have a routed access design with your distribution switches, MSHQ1 and MSHQ2 routing between access layer switches and the router.
    If you are trying to achieve something else other than a routed access layer design then please come back and clarify.
    But either way what you have now is not good and will not work properly.
    Jon

Maybe you are looking for