Solaris 10 01/06 update CE_PANIC corrupt fs

It seems Solaris 10 1/6 update, the CE_PANIC call corrupted the fs. I used failsafe mode to rebuilt the super block.
One time, even the failsafe mode hang in config. devices.
I've to use the install CD, boot to single-user mode in order to repair the superblk.
The same CE_PANIC call works in the previous release, that is I can reboot the system and remove the driver.
Any idea why ? Thanks

We are researching just such a thing now with Sun. If you have the partitions to devote to Solaris 10, then yes, Liveupgrade will work. I can't give details as we have not worked out the details but Sun has shown it too us.

Similar Messages

Performance Problem Database Server on Solaris 10 5/08 (Update 5) v890 Box

Hello,
I am having performance problems on Solaris 10 5/08 (Update 5) Production server below I have mentioned the details information about the system and some command iostat and vmstat reports:
Sun Fire V890
Ram 32 GB
Physical CPU 8 (Logical 16)
Application Oracle 10G
Raid 1
1) iostat report
extended device statistics tty
device r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv svc_t %w %b tin tout
md100 0.3 7.0 2.4 7.0 0.0 0.2 38.5 3 4 0 0
2/md3100 205.0 27.4 23099.6 472.2 0.0 2.5 10.9 0 79
2/md3200 225.3 27.3 24993.8 577.3 0.0 2.6 10.5 0 81
2/md3300 295.8 25.5 31538.0 412.5 0.0 3.1 9.8 0 84
2/md3400 198.3 25.6 21032.9 423.7 0.0 2.2 9.8 0 65
2/md3500 55.0 313.0 2397.5 2425.9 0.0 1.2 3.2 0 93
2/md3600 0.1 19.2 0.8 1440.0 0.0 0.1 5.4 0 10
2/md3700 3.1 0.8 48.8 35.7 0.0 0.0 9.3 0 4
2/md3800 300.4 0.7 30651.9 69.4 0.0 2.6 8.7 0 92
2/md3900 359.9 0.7 35876.8 56.6 0.0 3.3 9.1 0 95
2/md4100 0.6 512.1 9.6 1815.8 0.0 1.2 2.4 0 70
2/md4200 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0
2) vmstat report
kthr memory page disk faults cpu
r b w swap free re mf pi po fr de sr 2m 2m 2m 2m in sy cs us sy id
1 20 0 39126264 11482648 2570 5039 16336 14 14 0 1 41 38 47 61 71072 41785 30463 51 14 35
0 16 0 40580912 9157288 273 2366 0 8 7 0 0 198 310 251 192 49207 47702 29823 39 8 53
0 16 0 40588992 9163784 187 1392 0 8 8 0 0 251 278 212 163 47310 44840 27821 31 7 62
0 12 0 40597208 9171640 624 3168 0 2 2 0 0 298 329 209 245 49150 44768 26264 29 8 62
0 13 0 40577400 9158032 425 4452 0 9 8 0 0 177 181 331 292 49149 42545 25544 31 8 61
0 14 0 40576680 9156328 868 6027 0 8 7 0 0 161 234 259 327 48726 41187 26184 26 9 65
0 13 0 40567952 9151360 1067 7302 0 3 3 0 0 254 386 256 160 50388 45422 26596 31 10 60
0 13 0 40565160 9150880 838 6582 0 9 8 0 0 257 289 236 281 49697 45190 26925 31 10 60
0 12 0 40568616 9153128 640 4880 0 11 10 0 0 334 206 214 214 48738 43552 26431 27 9 65
0 12 0 40581696 9163248 799 5895 0 2 2 0 0 426 273 138 226 47831 41873 26301 30 9 61
0 11 0 40572096 9157896 1087 7138 1 10 9 0 0 337 163 220 305 53124 55371 27933 45 11 44
0 18 0 40520032 9123424 868 5946 0 10 9 0 0 222 218 170 249 51322 49556 27867 40 10 50
0 17 0 40528544 9130112 481 3257 0 1 1 0 0 276 269 145 316 56103 44359 27645 39 9 51
0 15 0 40521776 9126208 490 3174 0 10 8 0 0 240 305 226 222 55839 43464 27003 42 10 48
0 15 0 40491176 9101072 769 4149 0 8 8 0 0 297 362 150 317 59718 55624 34333 43 11 46
0 17 0 40603696 9183224 785 4364 0 2 2 0 0 314 234 281 238 62990 67554 39122 43 12 45
0 19 0 40622592 9215816 711 5308 1 12 12 0 0 390 167 252 283 65340 60514 30525 45 12 44
0 17 0 40662248 9276136 767 5113 0 10 8 0 0 218 280 298 221 63734 53314 31029 43 11 45
3) SAR CPU Utilization report
12:30:51 %usr %sys %wio %idle
12:31:01 41 9 0 50
12:31:11 43 11 0 46
12:31:21 42 11 0 47
12:31:31 44 12 0 44
12:31:41 42 11 0 47
Average 42 11 0 47
Anybody have any comment regarding the reports ?
Thanks for your help,
Srikanta Sanpui

A suggestion: if you use the code tags with your output it will be a great deal easier to read.
extended device statistics tty
device r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv svc_t %w %b tin tout
md100 0.3 7.0 2.4 7.0 0.0 0.2 38.5 3 4 0 0
2/md3100 205.0 27.4 23099.6 472.2 0.0 2.5 10.9 0 79
2/md3200 225.3 27.3 24993.8 577.3 0.0 2.6 10.5 0 81
2/md3300 295.8 25.5 31538.0 412.5 0.0 3.1 9.8 0 84
2/md3400 198.3 25.6 21032.9 423.7 0.0 2.2 9.8 0 65
2/md3500 55.0 313.0 2397.5 2425.9 0.0 1.2 3.2 0 93
2/md3600 0.1 19.2 0.8 1440.0 0.0 0.1 5.4 0 10
2/md3700 3.1 0.8 48.8 35.7 0.0 0.0 9.3 0 4
2/md3800 300.4 0.7 30651.9 69.4 0.0 2.6 8.7 0 92
2/md3900 359.9 0.7 35876.8 56.6 0.0 3.3 9.1 0 95
2/md4100 0.6 512.1 9.6 1815.8 0.0 1.2 2.4 0 70
2/md4200 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0

Linux, Solaris 8-10 Software Update Library Inactive

Hello All.
In the Navigation pane , in libraries , when i open Linux, Solaris 8-10 Software Update Library , the options on the left such as Upload config file , Upload local action and others are disabled.
I cannot click on them and perform an action! How can I get them enabled ?

Hello
I have same problem. Could you help us.

Firefox/Thunderbird in Solaris 10 8/07 (update 4)

Hello,
Firefox and TB are bundled in the latest Solaris 10 release. How does that release handle updates to these packages? Does the auto-update functionality of the software work (assuming user permission access to install directories), or will all FX/TB updates be handled by Solaris packages delivered via patches?
Thanks...

I assume that the FX update is grayed out because your login does not have permissions to write to the install directory.
Release of patch updates for FX/TB "when Sun deems it necessary" is EXACTLY what I am afraid of and want to avoid. Mozilla releases rather frequent updates with important security fixes. I want those updates immediately, not when Sun deems it necessary. Based on the performance of patches for Adobe Acrobat Reader and Adobe Flash, Sun is woefully slow on patch update releases for bundled third party software.
Mozilla releases s/w updates in Sun package format. Will there be some conflict with the Sun Update Manager/smpatch processes if I install the Mozilla packages over the bundled Mozilla software?
Another way to ask this question: Will Sun release patch updates for EVERY FX/TB release (e.g. 2.0.0.8, 2.0.0.9, etc.) or just releases that they deem important? Secondly, how long after Mozilla releases an update can we expect to receive a Solaris patch with that update?

I am trying to update my ipod touch but it says that the update was corrupted during download

I am trying to update my ipod touch but it says that the update was corrupted during download

Try disabling the computer's antivirus and firewall.
- Next try the manual install method of:
iDevice Troubleshooting 101 :: iPhone, iPad, iPod touch
- Then try on another computer
- Try when connected to another network

HT5654 itunes update error - corrupted, How do I get my itunes library back on my computer?

Itunes update error - corrupted. How do I get my Itunes library back on my computer? And if I "rer-install" will my devices , ipod, ipad, etc... be recognised and still contected?

See Troubleshooting issues with iTunes for Windows updates.
tt2

ITunes updates are "corrupt"???

I just installed Snow Leopard 10.6.3 (tried twice)....now my iTunes updates are corrupt. I want to load Mountain Lion but need the updates to do so. Help?!!

Welcome to Apple Discussions!
I've always been a bit queezy about doing an installation via target disk mode. Partly because as far as the installer knows, it is installing to an external hard drive of the Mac you are installing from, and not the machine that is actually target mode. This potentially could cause the wrong drivers to be installed. You may not see it until an update later on which you apply on the system, and when it happens, oops, you have an installation which doesn't work. Instead you should buy the Exchange program disks to run your installation. Those put Tiger on CD, as opposed to DVD. It is found here:
http://images.apple.com/macosx/pdf/TigerMXorderform20070419.pdf
Here's also my upgrade FAQ* which explains how you should go through updating to avoid problems with them:
http://www.macmaps.com/upgradefaq.html
I've noted my FAQ doesn't have the latest Media Exchange Program link, but it is above, and hope to change that later.
* Links to my page may give me compensation.

Sunfire x4200 Solaris 6/06 install/patch update problem - corrupts OS!

Hi
this is frusterating, I have a x4200, which when installing 'end user' solaris 10, boots/works just fine.
As part of best practice, I use sun's 'update manager' and it goes and downloads and installs. As normal a 'reboot' is required to finish installing some updates, and when it does this, after it installs and tries to reboot, i get a nasty error:
panic: cannot mount boot archive
I've done NOTHING besides load the base OS and patch, no other customization.
Why is this doing this?
I've tried to rebuild the boot archive info via:
bootadm update-archive -R /a
but this still fails, and my only option is to reboot.
anyone else seen/encountered this?

I initially tried the bootadm update-archive -R /a you tried, and it didn't work.
When I tried the 2nd time I used:
bootadm update-archive -f -R /a
and that worked. It restored the bootarchive from a 72k file to a 28M file and I could boot the machine properly after that.

Computer crashed while Firefox was updating and corrupted the program so it won't open at all and I can't get my many bookmarks

I have had recurrent problems with my computer crashing for the past several months that I was not able to fix. I was downloading and installing updates for Firefox when the computer suddenly and completely crashed - just an immediate shutdown. When I was able to reboot it, Firefox would no longer open, and I got the following error message, along with the 'bong' sound or an error: C:\ProgramFiles\MozillaFirefox\js3250.dll is either not designed to run on Windows or it contains an error...." The crash in the middle of the download corrupted Firefox so that it could no longer be accessed. HOW CAN I RECOVER MY FEW HUNDRED IMPORTANT BOOKMARKS? Any help you can give me with this would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!!! Ron

Do you have a PowerPC processor or an Intel processor?
Firefox 4 and later require at least OS X 10.5 and a Mac with an Intel processor.
*http://www.mozilla.org/firefox/15.0/system-requirements/
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/firefox-no-longer-works-mac-os-10-4-or-powerpc
You can find the latest Firefox 3.6.x release in all languages and for all Operating Systems here:
*Firefox 3.6.28: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all-older.html

ITunes 11 update is corrupt or not installed correctly for Mac. HELP!!

Hello,
got the update request for iTunes version 11, so I went through the installation process but after restarting my computer itunes would not work. It comes up with the message 'This version of iTunes is corrupt or not installed correctly, please reinstall itunes' there is no error code, it just says 'Error'
I have iMac, can anybody help me fix this?

http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/

ITunes 10.7 won't update - file corrupted

For some reason when I run my Software Update, iTunes 10.7 and the Security Update 2012-004 both download no problem, when I do a restart I'm told that the insatalltion could not be completed and that the files are damaged or corrupted.
If I try to download them directly from the relevant site pages, they again download no problem, but after double clicking the .dmg file I'm told the "data image corrupted" and if I fire open disk utility to verify it I'm told there is nothing wrong with the file!
This has been happening for the last week now and is getting a bit annoyiong, especially as I'm unable to transfer music to my new iPhone 5!
Machine Spec
iMac (4.1)
Processor - Intel Core Duo
Memory - 2GB Ram
Software - 10.6.8
Thanks in advance

I had this problem and got frustrated until I just kept pressing retry, and eventually it went through and successfully installed.

Won't Update! Corrupted File??

When I plug my iPod into my computer an error message pops up that says it can't be updated because there is a file on my iPod that is corrupted and unreadable. Is there anything i can do? Has anyone else ever had this problem? Please help me out! Thanks

It would appear that the iPod hard drive or iPod software has become corrupt. This doesn't mean that the songs are not on your iPod, hence the fact that the iPod reports used space and iTunes may show them. I've never seen a plausible explanation for why it does this.
You should restore the iPod and then reload the songs from iTunes.

Solaris 10 05/09 Update 7 - Zone shutdown issue

I have just clean installed several servers with solaris 10 update 7 (both sparc and x64, no other software installed) and I am getting the following svc error messages whenever I shutdown a zone.
Aug 19 18:26:22 svc.startd[25328]: svc:/network/ipsec/policy:default: Method "/usr/sbin/ipsecconf -F" failed with exit status 1.
Aug 19 18:26:22 svc.startd[25328]: svc:/network/ipsec/policy:default: Method "/usr/sbin/ipsecconf -F" failed with exit status 1.
Aug 19 18:26:22 svc.startd[25328]: svc:/network/ipsec/policy:default: Method "/usr/sbin/ipsecconf -F" failed with exit status 1.
Aug 19 18:26:23 svc.startd[25328]: network/ipsec/policy:default failed: transitioned to maintenance (see 'svcs -xv' for details)
The log file for svc:/network/ipsec/policy:default shows the following error.
+[ Aug 19 18:26:22 Stopping because service disabled. ]+
+[ Aug 19 18:26:22 Executing stop method ("/usr/sbin/ipsecconf -F") ]+
ipsecconf: (loading pf_policy) socket:: Permission denied
ipsecconf: unable to open policy socket: Permission denied
+[ Aug 19 18:26:22 Method "stop" exited with status 1 ]+
The errors occur in both sparse and whole root zones with a shared ip-type (does not occur in exclusive ip-type). The zonecfg is shown below.
set zonepath=/export/zones/rdo23wok
set autoboot=false
set ip-type=shared
add inherit-pkg-dir
set dir=/lib
end
add inherit-pkg-dir
set dir=/platform
end
add inherit-pkg-dir
set dir=/sbin
end
add inherit-pkg-dir
set dir=/usr
end
add net
set address=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/xx
set physical=bge0
end
Looking at the release notes for 05/09 update 7 it mentions that "IP security (IPsec) is now managed by the following Solaris Management Facility (SMF) services" which seems to fit with the error I am getting.
Although I can prevent the error messages by disabling the service in each zone with svcadm it is a bit annoying and would like to have a better solution. Does anyone know how I can prevent this service from being enabled when I create a new zone?
Thanks
Jools
Edited by: joolshomer on Aug 19, 2009 10:57 AM

I have just clean installed several servers with solaris 10 update 7 (both sparc and x64, no other software installed) and I am getting the following svc error messages whenever I shutdown a zone.
Aug 19 18:26:22 svc.startd[25328]: svc:/network/ipsec/policy:default: Method "/usr/sbin/ipsecconf -F" failed with exit status 1.
Aug 19 18:26:22 svc.startd[25328]: svc:/network/ipsec/policy:default: Method "/usr/sbin/ipsecconf -F" failed with exit status 1.
Aug 19 18:26:22 svc.startd[25328]: svc:/network/ipsec/policy:default: Method "/usr/sbin/ipsecconf -F" failed with exit status 1.
Aug 19 18:26:23 svc.startd[25328]: network/ipsec/policy:default failed: transitioned to maintenance (see 'svcs -xv' for details)
The log file for svc:/network/ipsec/policy:default shows the following error.
+[ Aug 19 18:26:22 Stopping because service disabled. ]+
+[ Aug 19 18:26:22 Executing stop method ("/usr/sbin/ipsecconf -F") ]+
ipsecconf: (loading pf_policy) socket:: Permission denied
ipsecconf: unable to open policy socket: Permission denied
+[ Aug 19 18:26:22 Method "stop" exited with status 1 ]+
The errors occur in both sparse and whole root zones with a shared ip-type (does not occur in exclusive ip-type). The zonecfg is shown below.
set zonepath=/export/zones/rdo23wok
set autoboot=false
set ip-type=shared
add inherit-pkg-dir
set dir=/lib
end
add inherit-pkg-dir
set dir=/platform
end
add inherit-pkg-dir
set dir=/sbin
end
add inherit-pkg-dir
set dir=/usr
end
add net
set address=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/xx
set physical=bge0
end
Looking at the release notes for 05/09 update 7 it mentions that "IP security (IPsec) is now managed by the following Solaris Management Facility (SMF) services" which seems to fit with the error I am getting.
Although I can prevent the error messages by disabling the service in each zone with svcadm it is a bit annoying and would like to have a better solution. Does anyone know how I can prevent this service from being enabled when I create a new zone?
Thanks
Jools
Edited by: joolshomer on Aug 19, 2009 10:57 AM

Need patchset/patch cluster for solaris 10 5/09 update 7 to update8

Please let me know where i can download the patch cluster or patchset to upgrade solaris 10 5/09 from update 7 to update8
Solaris 10 5/09 s10s_u7wos_08 SPARC to Solaris 10 5/09 s10s_u8wos_08 SPARC
Its a 64 bit SPARC
Thanks in advance.
With Regards
Suresh Rao Jc
Edited by: user13549783 on 14-Apr-2012 05:55

Moderator Advice:
Welcome to the OTN forums.
This is your very first post to the forums, so before you go any further, a piece of advice:
When you give your post a title of "Hi All" it does not tell anyone anything about what your inquiry might be.
The topic title that you place onto each one of your posts is just as important as what you place into your post. It tells everyone whether they need to spend any time with it. It tells everyone whether you are worth spending time with, whether you will be able to understand what they type in a reply, how technical they can be in a response.
These are technical forums. They are not chat rooms for casual feel-good gatherings. They are not `blogs`. The site is also NOT a way to make contact to Oracle's technical support staff. The OTN community is from the entire globe and is from end-users that happen to have an interest in the topics you read here.
Spend some time reading the forum FAQ,
https://wikis.oracle.com/display/Forums/Forums+FAQ
which is linked at the top corner of every page.
Also, spend some time with the forums Terms Of Use
http://www.oracle.com/us/legal/terms/index.html
which is linked at the bottom of every page.
In particular, spend some time reviewing section #6 in that T.O.U.
When you make your posts more informative and easier to read then responses will be more helpful.
... now go back and edit your post. Change the title to something that better describes your actual question.

Clean Install Solaris 10 05/09 - Update Manager Fails with Valid Acct

I have a clean install of Solaris 10 05/09, and Update Manager fails to register using a valid accout which I can login with at the Sun website. Why is this happening? How can this be fixed?

Here's the output from the script....
User: root
Logname: root
Tue Oct 6 15:35:18 EDT 2009
unknown
smpatch settings:
patchpro.backout.directory - ""
patchpro.baseline.directory - /var/sadm/spool
patchpro.download.directory - /var/sadm/spool
patchpro.install.types - rebootafter:reconfigafter:standard
patchpro.patch.source - https://getupdates1.sun.com/
patchpro.patchset - current2
patchpro.proxy.host - ""
patchpro.proxy.passwd **** ****
patchpro.proxy.port - 8080
patchpro.proxy.user - ""
smpatch analyze:
Failure: Cannot connect to retrieve current2.zip: This system is currently unreg istered and is unable to retrieve patches from the Sun Update Connection. Please register your system using the Update Manager, /usr/bin/updatemanager or provid e valid Sun Online Account(SOA) credentials.
Entitlement:
cat: cannot open /var/sadm/spool/cache/entitlement/*entitlement_client
Sun UC patch revision:
120336-04
121082-06
121119-16
121454-02
123004-03
123006-07
123631-03
123896-05
123896-15
124187-07
137138-09
Solaris release:
Solaris 10 5/09 s10x_u7wos_08 X86
Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 30 March 2009
Solaris Kernel: Generic_141415-10
Machine Type: i86pc
Platform: i86pc
Java versions:
System default:
java version "1.5.0_21"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_21-b01)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_21-b01, mixed mode, sharing)
Java 5:
java version "1.5.0_21"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_21-b01)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_21-b01, mixed mode, sharing)
Java 6:
Unable to locate JRE meeting specification "1.6*"
Java used by smpatch and updatemanager:
/usr/sbin/pprosvc:JAVACMD="/usr/jdk/latest/bin/java -version:1.5*"
/bin/updatemanager:JAVA_EXEC="/usr/jdk/latest/bin/java -version:1.5*"
Cacao Java version:
java-home=/usr/jdk/jdk1.5.0_21
Cacao Base Directories:
cacao.install.rt.base.dir=/
cacao.install.etc.base.dir=/
Software Cluster:
CLUSTER=SUNWCall
All ccr properties:
18:
Property not defined: 18
cns.assetid:
cns.br.SunUCenabled:
true
cns.ccr.keyGenPath:
/usr/lib/cc-ccr/bin/ccrKeyGen
cns.clientid:
cns.httpproxy.auth:
cns.httpproxy.ipaddr:
cns.httpproxy.port:
cns.regtoken:
cns.security.password:
cns.security.privatekey:
cns.security.publickey:
cns.swup.UMautolaunch:
false
cns.swup.autoAnalysis.enabled:
true
cns.swup.checkinInterval:
2
cns.swup.lastCheckin:
0
cns.swup.patchbaseline:
current
cns.swup.regRequired:
true
cns.transport.serverurl:
patchsvr not installed.
Sun UC package status:
SUNWbreg not installed
SUNWdc not installed
Cacao instances:
online 15:19:45 svc:/application/management/common-agent-container-1:def ault
Services in maintenance/disabled state:
svc:/application/print/server:default (LP print server)
State: disabled since Tue Oct 06 15:15:37 2009
Reason: Disabled by an administrator.
See: http://sun.com/msg/SMF-8000-05
See: man -M /usr/share/man -s 1M lpsched
Impact: 2 dependent services are not running:
svc:/application/print/rfc1179:default
svc:/application/print/ipp-listener:default
Please attach /tmp/unknown-061009-suc-out.Z in your reply to the Sun Update Conn ection Technical Support Team.
#

Solaris 10 01/06 update CE_PANIC corrupt fs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for