Solaris 10 06/06 x86 and Gigabyte-GA-8I865GVM

Hello all.
I try to install Solaris 10 06/06 x86 on workstation with Gigabyte-GA-8I865GVM motherboard with intergrated ethernet-card.
System installation process finish successfully, but system don't "see" network card.
Whta steps i can made for networking?

hello,
Can you share with me your experiences in installing solaris 10 on this particular model of gigabyte motherboard? I am trying to build a desktop with solaris 10 as the default o/s.
Or do u know of any other motherboards with minimal installation and compatibility problems?
Shiva.

Similar Messages

  • Does WLS 4.5.1 Run on Solaris 2.7 (x86) ???

    All--
    Does WLS 4.5.1 run on Solaris 2.7 (x86) or does it not? The system in
    question was running Solaris 2.6 (x86) and WLS 4.5.1 ran quite happily
    on that. What is the snag with 2.7? I am using JDK 1.1.7 (and have
    alternated w/ JDK 1.2.1).
    Mainly, WLS keeps looking for (and not finding) 'weblogicunix1' shared
    library file. I have nativeIO disabled but the server insists on this
    behaviour.
    Further, I have seen news postings regarding issues with servers that
    are running on Solaris 2.7 (x86) so it is obvious that it does indeed
    run. What is the trick to getting it working? It seems to trip up when
    attempting to bind to the assigned ports.
    Any tips/advice/suggestions will be greatly appreciated!
    TIA
    Ben

    We have not certified on X86 Solaris, there is no business case for it.
    Having said that I think this library should only load if you are running
    as a priv user and try to switch to nobody status. This library does not
    exist for x86.
    Sorry
    Mark G.
    In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...
    Sorry. Here's the error message I keep getting:
    Tue Jun 06 09:38:46 EDT 2000:<E> <SSLListenThread> ListenThread:run
    failed:
    Tue Jun 06 09:38:46 EDT 2000:<E> <SSLListenThread>
    java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no weblogicunix1
    in java.library.path
    at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Native Method)
    at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Compiled Code)
    at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Compiled Code)
    at java.lang.Error.<init>(Error.java:50)
    at java.lang.LinkageError.<init>(LinkageError.java:43)
    at
    java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError.<init>(UnsatisfiedLinkError.java:42)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(Compiled Code)
    at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:471)
    at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:745)
    at <Unloaded Method>
    at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
    at java.lang.Class.forName0(Compiled Code)
    at java.lang.Class.forName(Compiled Code)
    at
    weblogic.platform.OperatingSystem.getOS(OperatingSystem.java:77)
    at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr$1.run(T3Srvr.java:1174)
    at weblogic.t3.srvr.Callback.done(Callback.java:37)
    at
    weblogic.t3.srvr.SSLListenThread.newServerSocket(SSLListenThread.java:341)
    at weblogic.t3.srvr.ListenThread.run(Compiled Code)
    Tue Jun 06 09:38:46 EDT 2000:<E> <SSLListenThread> **** The WebLogic
    Server is no longer listening f
    or connections.
    Tue Jun 06 09:38:46 EDT 2000:<E> <SSLListenThread> **** You should
    probably restart it.
    Tue Jun 06 09:38:46 EDT 2000:<I> <WebLogicServer> Server shutdown by
    system
    Tue Jun 06 09:39:44 EDT 2000:<I> <WebLogicServer> WebLogic Server
    started
    Tue Jun 06 09:39:44 EDT 2000:<I> <WebLogicServer> Server shutdown
    commencing NOW
    ==================================================
    NewsGroup Rant
    ==================================================
    Rant 1.
    The less info you provide about your problem means
    the less we can help you. Try to look at the
    problem from an external perspective and provide
    all the data necessary to put your problem in
    perspective.

  • Solaris 8 x86 and 10 x86 differences

    I have a device driver that works on Solaris 8 x86. I installed this same device driver on a box with Solaris 10 x86. Under Solaris 10 x86 I get a message "WARNING: minor name <tec
    _0> is not compatible network driver name <tec>". Also, opening the device under Solaris 10 x86 will cause the OS to quit responding. Where can I find a list of differences between Solaris 8 x86 and Solaris 10 x86?
    Thanks.
    David

    Another way to install Matrox G550 is to Install AcceleratedX from www.xig.com
    It supports a lot of graphic card and it also supports hardware acceleration for OpenGL
    BUt obviously its not free :(

  • Solaris 8 on Sparc and X86

    Will I experience any problems connecting a Trusted Solaris 8 X86 systems to a SPARC Trusted 8 system? Will all the trusted features work between the two.
    Thx

    I am using Java 5.0 to develop applets, but if I use
    all the possibilities that 5.0 version offers (such
    as enum) that means that clients viewing my applet
    must have JRE 5.0 as well. Does that mean a very
    recent browser will be required?no.
    I found which browsers support Java 5.0 on the page
    J2SE 5.0 "Supported System Configurations" at
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/system-configurations.h
    tml
    In short, what I take from there is that browsers
    required would be:
    - Mozilla 1.4+
    - Internet Explorer 5.5 (SP2+), 6.x on Windows
    platforms
    - Netscape 4.7.x on Solaris 8 on SPARC and x86
    - Netscape 7 and 7.1 are not offically supported, but
    should work
    I have no idea how recent these versions are and
    whether it is acceptable to assume that web visitors
    will have these versions. I'd think it is almost safe to assume people have those, they're not that young. the question is rather "do they have the JRE 1.5.0?"

  • Sun Solaris X86 and 10.2

    Hello,
    do anybody know when 10.2.0.1 for 10.2 Solaris x86 will be available?
    I did not find any informations on metalink....
    Thanks and Regards

    Hi,
    Certification for 10gR2 on Solaris Operating System x86 Version 10 is planned for february 2006...
    Nicolas.

  • Cross compiling apps on solaris 8 for solaris 10 x86 and x64

    Hi All,
    We have a few applications built on Solaris 8. and we want to build the same apps on Solaris 10 x86 and x64 but the problem is clearcase does not support Solaris 10 yet.
    Can we cross compile the apps on Solaris 8 for Solaris 10 x86 and x64 ? and how ?
    waiting for any info on this.
    TIA,
    warm regards,
    Girish

    FYI, I noticed the reply on Sun Studio General Forum:
    If you build an app on one version of Solaris, the app will run on later Solaris versions. So in particular, you can build an x86 application on Solaris 8 and run it on Solaris 9 and 10.
    Unfortunately, an x64 application must be built on a Solaris x64 system, which first became available with Solaris 10.

  • JavaFX for Solaris x86 and/or OpenSolaris

    Will there be a release for Solaris x86 and/or OpenSolaris. WHats up DoC!

    According to Metalink Doc ID 742060.1, modified 28-Sep-2009, it appears that 4th Quarter Calendar Year 2009 will see a Solaris x86-64 release of 11.2.0.1
    That's good news!
    Chris

  • Sane,  Solaris x86, and possibly Staroffice 8

    I am running Solaris 10 6/06 and have installed the companion cd as well as someother things (Quake II, QEMU for example). I am trying to set up a USB HP office Jet 5500 all-in-one series. I set it up as a printer but i cant set up the scanner functions. I run the following commands and get the following output:
    # /opt/sfw/bin/sane-find-scanner
    # No SCSI scanners found. If you expected something different, make sure that
    # you have loaded a SCSI driver for your SCSI adapter.
    found USB scanner (vendor=0x03f0 [hp], product=0x3a11 [officejet 5500 series]) at libusb:/dev/usb:3f0.3a11/0
    found USB scanner (vendor=0x046d, product=0x0921, chip=ICM532B) at libusb:/dev/usb:46d.921/0
    # Your USB scanner was (probably) detected. It may or may not be supported by
    # SANE. Try scanimage -L and read the backend's manpage.
    # Not checking for parallel port scanners.
    # Most Scanners connected to the parallel port or other proprietary ports
    # can't be detected by this program.
    # /opt/sfw/bin/scanimage -L
    No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different,
    check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the
    sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation
    which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages).
    As you can see SANE can find the scanner from 'sane-find-scanner' but does not recognize it with 'scanimage -L'. I would greatly appriate any assistance and thank you for reading this.

    Hi,
    Thanks for this answer. I4ve already been through this step, but debuging is really hard as you have to check multiple trace file.
    Reading the docs back again, it seems linux kernel 2.6.9.x needs to be patched for EFI disk names.
    I will ask the same question again : will Sun release a QFS install other than RPMs and working with UP TO DATE kernels ?
    The only release is for kernel 2.4 or 2.6.9, and they both need to be recompiled with a damn EFI patch. Why not provide a rpm working against 2.6.10 or... 2.6.20 which already have it ?
    My next move will be to try to run QFS with a 2.6.10 kernel (even if not supported).
    ps : my hardware is a Sun Netra 4200. Os is Linux Centos 4, which should be (and is) binary compatible with Red-Hat. Why is the QFS install script not working then ?
    Sun, please, Red-Hat or Suse are not the only Linux distro not the best. Open your eyes and your support to other distros :)

  • How print duplex on Solaris 10 0508 x86 ?

    Hello,
    I just installed Solaris 10 0508 x86 on a Ultra 20. We have a networked HP laserjet 8150dn printer. What is the option to print duplex?
    Previously on Solaris 10, 1106, I followed the instructions on http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/content/submitted/duplex_printing.html and was able to print double-sided.
    However, now on update 0508, the same lp and lpadmin option "-o sides=two-sided-short-edge" doesn't work - still prints single-sided. What gives? Please help me save a tree!
    These lp or lpadmin options didn't work either:
    "-o duplex"
    "-o sides=duplex"
    Also looked at HP's SOLe134.PKG, but it's for SPARC, not x86 - couldn't find a download for x86.
    Thanks!
    Edited by: onetree on Jul 16, 2008 9:36 PM

    I'm not sure if there was some sort of corruption, but I eventually resolved the issue by removing and readding the printing-related packages from the CD:
    SUNWpcr
    SUNWpcu
    SUNWpsr
    SUNWpsu
    SUNWpsf
    SUNWscplp
    SUNWspman
    SUNWscpu
    and then installing a default local virtual printer before the network one:
    # lpadmin -p new-printer -v /dev/term/a -T PS -I postscript..
    # enable new-printer
    # accept new-printer
    # lpstat -t

  • Solaris 8 on x86: been there, am back

    Just a quick opinion on my Solaris experience: it's as evil as Win2K when it comes to partitioning, except it's even harder (in my case not possible) to get lilo to boot Solaris, even on a primary partition... it's not quicker than Linux or FreeBSD, as user-hostile as *BSD, the install feels clunky and awkward...
    CDE is awful, even XFCE beats it by miles, I'm glad GNOME is there but not for x86 alas??
    ash could really be replaced by bash or anything with command line completion for instance, etc etc.
    I won't blame them for lack of hardware support, but as it is I was without network under Solaris (USB ADSL), so really there wasn't much to keep me using it. Except it's messed up my partitions badly enough that I had to reinstall Linux and FreeBSD...
    I am sure quite a few of you disagree with that, but I haven't seen any reason to stick to Solaris on my x86. Dissenting opinions please feel free to do so, I am disappointed but curious nevertheless...

    Hello,
    Actually, I have had a miserable experience attempting to install Solaris 8 on "ANY" INTEL hardware I have. At least, you were able to get it to install. It's a shame though, Sun and others complain about how Microsoft is trying to monopolize, but as much as I do agree for the most part, I have to give it to MS. Their OS' 95/98/W2K/NT, they all work on "ANY" hardware it seems as long as you can get the drivers from the manufacturer -- from the oldest to the newest machines.
    For Sun to enjoy a better share of the market, it needs to spend more time ensuring its OS works(even if it's not supported) on most INTEL H/W. This will ensure people, like myself(consultants) who are looking at new possibilities for Unix can seriously consider the product by evaluating it on simple machines and once proven can actually consider the product as part of a recommendation to customers. What this has reaffirmed, is that, the big 3 Unix houses -- HP, SUN, and IBM have a great product on Mid-to-Mainframes but are still sleeping while MS makes a BIG whole in their pocket with software that works on ANY! platform or H/W. The reality is that I would be hard pressed to recommend Linux for any "Prime Time" production(don't get me wrong, Linux is just fine and I use it and will continue to use it, but it's not ready for prime time) application and although I do not believe MS NT or 2K has the maturity of Unix, it certainly stands out in terms of viability. If this is another way to sell more proprietary boxes, I'll just say -- remember what happened to apple? Great product with a very smaaall market share...
    As you can tell, I am deeply dissapointed because SUN make awsome workstations and servers and can easly translate that success to the INTEL platform by having their software run on more H/W(even if it's not supported). This would definitely go a long way, in my opinion, to gain the market share they seem to be wanting to acquire since they did take MS to court.
    Very Dissapointed,
    Frank

  • Installation of Solaris 10 pr x86 paltform

    Hello !
    Recently I get a version of Solaris 10 for x86 paltform.
    I've tried to install Solaris on my comp but I get the next
    error:
    elf32 read error
    Load error: Read of "paltform/i86pc/kernel/unix failed.
    First I thought that the problem is in SATA 160 Maxtor disk,
    becouse i had one problem with live distribution of Ubuntu Linux too.
    So I remove this harddisk and i've replaced it with the ATA Maxtor disk.
    I've got the same result.
    Has anyone any idea what could be wrong?
    Thank you!
    by Damijan Bec

    I'm newbie in Unix arena so what is "elf32 and " fb" ?
    I was hooked by linux three years ago, and now I'm trying to find out what the really UNIX lookse like. And the other reason is that ESRI (GIS software) software works better on UNIX platform then Linux.

  • Installation of solaris 10 on x86 intel dual core or core 2 duo

    hi all,
    while i am installing solaris 10 on x86 machine which has 250 GB hard disk and 4 GB RAM with intel dual core processor
    the first steps are going cool i.e. in the first cd it asks about partitions and it is accepting the partitions and also the partitions sizes what i am giving are:
    / -- 30 GB, /etc -- 6GB, /home -- 6GB, /usr -- 6GB, /export/home -- 100GB, /var -- 9GB, swap-- 10GB
    and after the first CD got installed it asks for restart the system and when it
    boots then i am getting the booting option and i selected it as solaris and one more thing to tell is it has already Windows XP pro+sp2
    after selecting it boots with solaris and
    after few seconds it restarts
    please tell me if any body knows that is there any compatability issue with the processor that solaris is not going to support for intel core 2 duo or dual core processors
    looking for the good reply

    OK, so what are the options if we run the HCL check and come up with some incompatibilities??
    I have Solaris 11/06 (from DVD media) installed on a brand new Dell Inspiron 530 (dual boot with XP). After the grub menu appears, and selecting 'Solaris', it takes about 3 minutes to get to a command line. I get a few errors at that time, such as:
    file in / differ from the boot archive: /etc/path_to_inst
    cannot find /etc/devices/mdi_ib_cache: no such file
    I tried running 'svcadm clear system/boot-archive' and it seems to attempt to boot into a graphical CDE, but I just end up with an unintelligible multi-colored display, and need to power off.
    I've checked the HCL and found some incompatibilities, but I don't know how to work-around these?
    Running the Hardware compatibility test came up with the following:
    No Solaris Driver
    No Solaris Driver
    Communication
    Conexant
    HSF 56k Data/Fax Modem
    No Solaris Driver
    No Solaris Driver
    Network
    Intel Corporation
    *82562V-2 10/100 Network Connection*
    No Solaris Driver
    No Solaris Driver
    Multimedia
    Intel Corporation
    HD Audio Controller
    Can I simply disable the Modem and the HD audio in windows XP device manager, then reboot to Solaris, to get around these two (I tried this already)??
    For the network card driver incompatibility, there is a Sun doc that says the workaround is to run: update_drv -a -i '"pci8086,1064"' iprb, but when I run this command at the initial Solaris command line, or try to edit any file for that matter, I get the error "read-only file system" Seems I have my hands tied in maintenance mode.
    Thanks.

  • Compilation error, no  /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc on Solaris 10 64bit(x86)

    I was trying to compile Apache mod_jk on Solaris 10 64bit platform(x86) and I got the following error. I checked my system and I do not have /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc. Any suggestions how to solve it?
    root@unknown >./configure --with-apxs=/usr/apache2/bin/apxs
    building connector for "apache-2.0"
    checking for gcc... /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc
    checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
    See `config.log' for more details.
    Edited by: loveclaire on Aug 5, 2009 8:26 PM

    SUNWspro is sun studio. Its a free download from the sun site. So you could just install that.
    Alternatively, Solaris ships with gcc already installed. But apxs is trying to be clever and compile mod_jk with the same compiler that was used to compile the rest of apache.
    It would probably work with gcc, but I'm not sure how you would persuade apxs to use gcc instead.

  • Reconfigure reboot for Solaris 10 u5 x86 guest in VirtualBox

    Hello,
    I just installed the new kernal patch into a Solaris 10 u5 x86 32-bit guest OS in VirtualBox 2.0.4 on a WinXP 32-bit host. I need to do a reconfigure reboot. I can't seem to get to the ok prompt from which to use boot -r. init 0 does not work, it only offers a "push any key to reboot."
    What is the optimal way to initiate a reconfigure reboot for Solaris 10 in my setup?
    I tried the grub-based technique in which, upon reboot, I get the grub menu and push "e." That gets me to another grub screen with 3 entries. I selected the kernal entry, pushed "c" to add "-r" to the end of the line, and then "b" to reboot. Is that the best way to reconfigure reboot for Sol 10 x86.
    The above method did configure devices on reboot, but I'm not sure that is the best way to boot -r
    Thank you in advance...

    x86 machines (including virtual machines) do not have an OBP or an 'ok' prompt.
    You have to manipulate the GRUB either through interactive commands like you've shown, or by editing the menu.lst file to change boot parameters.
    Of course for reconfiguration, you also have the option of touching '/reconfigure' and doing a normal reboot.
    Darren

  • Solaris 8/07 x86, wireless intel 2200bg networking

    Just finished a dvd-based install of solaris 8/07 x86 (not opensolaris) and everything good, except wireless networking.
    Before the install, I ran the suitability/compatibility tester and it vetted my wifi and everything else.
    ifconfig doesn't show my iwi interface. no /dev/iwi? either. And no wificonfig tool anywhere on the hard drive.
    Did I miss a step in the install?
    What do I need to do to be able to wifi on this supported wifi?
    I will eventually try the opensolaris, but I have 640MB and the opensolaris doesn't install unless it sees 768 MB.
    N.B: openBSD and BSD/nixes experienced ... but a little new to solaris so any and all pointers and details appreciated.
    Thanks,
    /Scott
    Edited by: 8F27E956 on Feb 9, 2008 3:56 PM

    ifconfig doesn't show my iwi interface.Did you do:
    ifconfig -a plumb
    ifconfig -a
    This is the answer to a really FAQ:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "ifconfig -a" on Solaris will only show "plumb"ed interfaces.
    Plumb your interface(s) first!
    If you don't know the name (or index#) use "ifconfig -a plumb" to plumb all (that wasn't already plumbed)!
    "plumb" is to power on, and load and initialize the driver for the relevant interface.
    P�l

Maybe you are looking for