Solaris 10 fails to install on Compaq ML370

Hello All,
I would like to install Solaris10 on Compaq ProLiant ML370. I've configured the machine to expect UNIX - Solaris. I see on Compaq's web that Solaris 2.6, 2.7 and 8 are supported.
Unfortunatelly, when I boot from installation DVD the setup crashes with this error:
PANIC [CPU0] /thread=fec1e1a0: BAD TRAP:TYPE=0 (+DE DIVIDE ERROR).
I am downloading Solaris 10 (11/06) to give it a try... I would appreciate any suggestions.
Thank you for your time.
DanielD

Hello All,
This issue has been addressed by setting OS to 'other' (not Solaris).
I've used smartstart cd and removed all server's configuration. Then, I've set the server for Solaris installation (The Solaris 2.6 up to 8 are supported). The bad trap error did show up again. However, when I changed the OS to 'other', I was able to start the installation process successfully.
Thank you,
Daniel

Similar Messages

Itunes 7 fails to install - QuickTime problem.

I successfully used an earlier Itunes with an Ipod 1GB Nano. My new 2GB Nano (courtesy of Netgear promotion!) demanded V7 which I downloaded and tried to install. There were many errors installing Quicktime, but one was
"Could not open key HKEYLOCALMACHINES\software\classes\QuickTimePlayerLib.QuicktimePlayerApp\CLSID"
Verify that you have sufficient access to that key, or contact your support personnel"
I accessed myself (8-)# I tried running regedit, but that key and all the other "QuickTime" "software/classes/" keys gave the same error. I tried right clicking to set permissions, but although the list comes up, I cannot enable any of them.
I even tried safe mode, but all those entries are give similar errors. I have now deleted all references to "QuickTime" in the registry except the inaccessible ones, and the "Program Files" directory, but installation gives the same errors.
The result is that Itunes will not install, and I am unable to use my new Ipod.
A Google search finds no-one with similar problems.
Any ideas?

I am answering this blind as I did not realise I would not have access to the previous posting! Thanks for responding.
There is no version number of the installer under properties, but it says "V7" when run, and was downloaded earlier today (38,808,256 bytes) from the Apple site (as linked to by my then presumably working Itunes).
I see exactly my problem is in http://forums.vnunet.com/thread.jspa?threadID=93546&tstart=0
and unresolved.
I rolled back Windows to yesterday (and then the day before), and now find I cannot even uninstall either Quicktime or Itunes. The "Add or Remove programs" utility starts its progress bar and then quits with no report. I tried a re-install of the only previous installation of Itunes and it reported "You have a later version of Itunes installed" (meaning presumably V7) The Itunes I have on disk will not run "Files missing". This I suppose must be due to the failed installation of V7, which System Restore has failed to undo.
I tried then the V7 install again, and got:
"QuickTime failed to install Error #-2903"
and later
"Error 1905 c:\Program Files\Quicktime\QTOControl.dll
Hresult -2147220472"
... and then followed by three or four registry errors in HKEYLOCALMACHINES\SOFTWARE\Classes\ including the one I started this thread with. All these registry items are inaccesible under regedit ("Error opening key").
I am now in a position that I cannot go back or forward and still cannot link my IPOD to Itunes.
Is Itunes the only program that can transfer music?
It seems that one cannot simply copy, as firstly there is no "music" folder, and when it is done in a kosher way, the filenames are changed to an internal format, with the real names in a database.
It looks like Apple are managing to stop loads of other people using their new IPODs. I would ask for my money back if it wasn't a gift from Netgear (8-)#
Compaq Presario X1316 Windows XP
Compaq Presario X1316 Windows XP

Fresh solaris 10 x86 install patch update problems 119060-17 ...

Just yesterday, i installed a fresh Solaris 10 x86 onto some pc hardware. After getting solaris installed and issues with my network card, i downloaded and installed the free version of the update manager 1.0.x. Next, i proceeded to update all the general patches for the solaris 10 system. I started with the command 'pprosvc -i' from a terminal. It then proceeded to download and validate a bunch of patches successfully until it hit the following 3 patches:
119060-17 ---- X11 6.6.2_x86: Xsun patch
122213-10 ---- GNOME 2.6.0_x86: GNOME Desktop Patch
122912-02 ---- SunOS 5.10_x86: Apache 1.3 Patch
All 3 failed some kind of validation and then crashed the pprosvc program, at which point it exited with the following error:
122912-02 cannot be validated
119060-17 cannot be validated
122912-02 cannot be validated
Unexpected Failure: java.lang.Throwable: ERROR: Failed to validate the digital signature(s).
I also tried to use the GUI Update Manager to update, hoping the problem was isolated to pprosvc, but that problem was also in the GUI with a similar error message:
Error occurred...The detailed error message is: Unexpected Failure: java.lang.Throwable: ERROR: Failed to validate the digitial signature(s)
Anyone know why Sun's update patch process is so troublesome?
Getting Tired of Solaris Updates...
I should mention that this is the free solaris 10 x86 install and i don't have a service contract with Sun. If this problem persists, i don't think i'll get one, as i see only further problems after buying one.
tired and confused

Hi,
There is an issue with this that is currently being investigated. There is another thread that may shed some light on what is happening here;
http://forum.sun.com/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=316
Thread title is : Sun UC, Digitally Signed Patches Using New Verisign Certificates
In the short-term please ensure that the patch mentioned in it is installed.
To quote part of mentioned thread above:
"Once the Sun Update Connection client software is upgraded with patch 121118-06 (SPARC) or 121119-06 (x86/x64) or later revisions normal behavior will resume. "
If this fails to resolve your problem, would you be kind enough to post the output of the following command for analysis please;
# showrev -p | egrep -e '121454|121119|120336|121082|121564|122232|119789'
Sincerely,
Moderator.
Message was edited by:
ForumModerator

Solaris Express Zone install error with SUNWiiimr and SUNWcnetr

Hi all,
I got these errors when installing a new zone on a Solaris Express 1/08 (5.11) on a x64 box:
Installation of these packages generated errors: SUNWiiimr
Installation of these packages generated warnings: SUNWcnetr
The zone creation log shows:
*** package -SUNWiiimr- failed to install with fatal errors:
/export/zones/newzone/root/var/sadm/pkg/SUNWiiimr/install/postin stall: /export/zones/newzone/root/lib/postrun: not found
/export/zones/newzone/root/var/sadm/pkg/SUNWiiimr/install/postinstall: /export/zones/newzone/root/lib/postrun: not found
pkgadd: ERROR: postinstall script did not complete successfully
Installation of -SUNWiiimr- on zone -newzone- failed.
*** package -SUNWcnetr- installed with warnings:
pkgadd: ERROR: unable to create package object -/export/zones/newzone/root/etc/dladm-.
owner name -dladm- not found in passwd table(s)
ERROR: attribute verification of -/export/zones/newzone/root/etc/dladm/aggregation.conf- failed
owner name -dladm- not found in passwd table(s)
ERROR: attribute verification of -/export/zones/newzone/root/etc/dladm/linkprop.conf- failed
owner name -dladm- not found in passwd table(s)
ERROR: attribute verification of -/export/zones/newzone/root/etc/dladm/secobj.conf- failed
owner name -dladm- not found in passwd table(s)
Installation of -SUNWcnetr- on zone -newzone- partially failed.
-newzone- was configured to be a whole root zone. Are there any ways to solve these installation errors?
Thanks in advance.

This problem seems some strange - this time with Solaris 10u4, from 10 containers installed on a brand new X2200 (2x cpu) only one do not output those errors, but just this one cannot install the dsee or proxy. This time the errors were from:
Installation of <SUNWxwplr> on zone <dsee-proxy> partially failed.
Installation of <SUNWdtdmr> on zone <dsee-proxy> partially failed.
Installation of <SUNWmconr> on zone <dsee-proxy> partially failed.
Installation of <SUNWrmwbr> on zone <dsee-proxy> partially failed.
Installation of <SUNWlvmr> on zone <dsee-proxy> partially failed.
Installation of <SUNWzebrar> on zone <dsee-proxy> partially failed.
So the machine was, too, just installed. After several hours, anoter atempt to install a zone, this time just this one, returned no errors - and the dsee installed without any complains. All configurations were for whole root zones. Used was Solaris 10u4 with the most recent patch cluster applied.

Smpatch update ALERT: Failed to install patch

I do not even know where to start. Since installing Solaris 10 0606 it
seems every time I try to patch the system I get failures of one type
or another. One problem today has to do with zones:
"To install the new instance of this package in all zones you must
first remove the existing instance of this package from the global
zone first (via pkgrm) and then install the new instance of this
package in all zones."
If sun already knows a pkgrm must be run why can't the smpatch command
just do it?
Another problem seems to be
For patch 121018-03, required patch 120759-04 does not exist
If sun knows a patch is required which is not on the system just Getit
and install it.
Also, what is up with having to reboot the box to install patches?
Why? Has this always been a required step? Do these reboots pertain only to kernel patches .etc?
I have seen other postings in this forum expressing unhappiness with
the patch system, some mentioning testing lab/group or certification
issues. I think smpatch should have an option to send smpatch results
back to sun for review. That way the Certification Group could have
real life situations to investigate. Or do they know the problems
already and just dont want to fix them? Just once I would love it if
smpatch came back with no failures and I was assured the system was
patched, up to date and secure.
Regards
# smpatch update
Update 120759-07 will not be downloaded since it already exists in the
download directory.
Update 121018-03 will not be downloaded since it already exists in the
download directory.
Update 121016-03 will not be downloaded since it already exists in the
download directory.
Update 121020-02 will not be downloaded since it already exists in the
download directory.
Update 121616-02 will not be downloaded since it already exists in the
download directory.
Update 120762-02 will not be downloaded since it already exists in the
download directory.
Installing patches from /var/sadm/spool...
Failed to install patch 120759-07.
patchadd utility failed. Reason code :0
Validating patches...Loading patches installed on the
system...Done!Loading patches requested to install.Done!Checking
patches that you specified for installation.Done!Approved patches will
be installed in this order:120759-07 Preparing checklist for
non-global zone check...Checking non-global zones...The following
requested patches rejected on non-global zone.Entire installation is
possible but those patcheswill not be installed on non-global
zone.myzone: Packages from patch 120759-07 are not installed on the
system.myzone2: Packages from patch 120759-07 are not installed on the
system.This patch passes the non-global zone check.None.Summary for
zones:Zone myzoneRejected patches:120759-07 Patches that passed the
dependency check:None.Zone myzone2Rejected patches:120759-07 Patches
that passed the dependency check:None.Patching global zoneAdding
patches...Checking installed patches...Verifying sufficient filesystem
capacity (dry run method)...Patch 120759-07 failed to install due to a
failure produced by pkgadd.See /var/sadm/patch/120759-07/log for
detailsPatchadd is terminating. WARNING: patchadd returned <5> for
global zone
ALERT: Failed to install patch 120759-07.
Failed to install patch 121018-03.
patchadd utility failed. Reason code :0
Validating patches...Loading patches installed on the
system...Done!Loading patches requested to install.Done!Checking
patches that you specified for installation.Done!The following
requested patches will not be installed becauseno patches required by
the patch are installed on this system. 0 For patch 121018-03,
required patch 120759-04 does not exist.No patches to install.
ALERT: Failed to install patch 121018-03.
Failed to install patch 121016-03.
patchadd utility failed. Reason code :0
Validating patches...Loading patches installed on the
system...Done!Loading patches requested to install.Done!Checking
patches that you specified for installation.Done!The following
requested patches will not be installed becauseno patches required by
the patch are installed on this system. 0 For patch 121016-03,
required patch 120759-06 does not exist.No patches to install.
ALERT: Failed to install patch 121016-03.
Failed to install patch 121020-02.
patchadd utility failed. Reason code :0
Validating patches...Loading patches installed on the
system...Done!Loading patches requested to install.Done!Checking
patches that you specified for installation.Done!The following
requested patches will not be installed becauseno patches required by
the patch are installed on this system. 0 For patch 121020-02,
required patch 120759-01 does not exist.No patches to install.
ALERT: Failed to install patch 121020-02.
Failed to install patch 121616-02.
patchadd utility failed. Reason code :0
Validating patches...Loading patches installed on the
system...Done!Loading patches requested to install.Done!Checking
patches that you specified for installation.Done!Approved patches will
be installed in this order:121616-02 Preparing checklist for
non-global zone check...Checking non-global zones...The following
requested patches rejected on non-global zone.Entire installation is
possible but those patcheswill not be installed on non-global
zone.myzone: Packages from patch 121616-02 are not installed on the
system.myzone2: Packages from patch 121616-02 are not installed on the
system.This patch passes the non-global zone check.None.Summary for
zones:Zone myzoneRejected patches:121616-02 Patches that passed the
dependency check:None.Zone myzone2Rejected patches:121616-02 Patches
that passed the dependency check:None.Patching global zoneAdding
patches...Checking installed patches...Verifying sufficient filesystem
capacity (dry run method)...Patch 121616-02 failed to install due to a
failure produced by pkgadd.See /var/sadm/patch/121616-02/log for
detailsPatchadd is terminating. WARNING: patchadd returned <5> for
global zone
ALERT: Failed to install patch 121616-02.
Failed to install patch 120762-02.
patchadd utility failed. Reason code :0
Validating patches...Loading patches installed on the
system...Done!Loading patches requested to install.Done!Checking
patches that you specified for installation.Done!Approved patches will
be installed in this order:120762-02 Preparing checklist for
non-global zone check...Checking non-global zones...The following
requested patches rejected on non-global zone.Entire installation is
possible but those patcheswill not be installed on non-global
zone.myzone: Packages from patch 120762-02 are not installed on the
system.myzone2: Packages from patch 120762-02 are not installed on the
system.This patch passes the non-global zone check.None.Summary for
zones:Zone myzoneRejected patches:120762-02 Patches that passed the
dependency check:None.Zone myzone2Rejected patches:120762-02 Patches
that passed the dependency check:None.Patching global zoneAdding
patches...Checking installed patches...Verifying sufficient filesystem
capacity (dry run method)...Patch 120762-02 failed to install due to a
failure produced by pkgadd.See /var/sadm/patch/120762-02/log for
detailsPatchadd is terminating. WARNING: patchadd returned <5> for
global zone
ALERT: Failed to install patch 120762-02.
/var/sadm/spool/patchpro_dnld_2006.08.22@11:16:20:EDT.txt has been
moved to
/var/sadm/spool/patchproSequester/patchpro_dnld_2006.08.22@11:16:20:EDT.txt
#

Enterprise users have strict policies on change management so dependent patches are not automatically installed when using "smpatch add". Neither are packages blithly uninstalled for zones if currently only existing in the global zone.
For your needs using "smpatch update" should analyse, download and install dependant patches in order for patches specified on the command line or for a global update. Note that that is with the exception of patches not matching the currently defined patch policy such as those needing a reboot. See the smpatch man page for information on policies.
Patches requiring reboots or being installed in single user mode are primarily for kernel and driver patches.
Your problems installing the Sun Studio 11 patches have been encountered previously in regards to globally installed packages (and are covered in this forum) and is due to a combination of bug ID's 6337009, 6214678 and 6374972 for the patching utilities of which the last is still open.
You will currently have to manually install the patches using patchadd with the "-G" flag whilst in the global zone to install them in the global zone only.

Failed to install a local copy of ias60.jar

Hello,
could anybody help me with this problem.
We have installed under Solaris: iPlanet Webserver6.0, Directory Server5.1 and Application Server6.5. In the console it is not possible to select iPlanet Application Server. Message: Class Loader Error:Failed to install a local copy of ias60.jar or one of its supporting files.
What can I do?
Thanks Juergen

Hi,
I'm not sure what console means, I assume it's the iAS registry tool, kregedit. Are you getting this error at the terminal windows ?
Normally, ias60.jar would be located in <ias-install root>/ias/java/jars/ias60.jar and <ias-install root>/java/jars/ias60.jar. Check in these two directories, also review the path settings in the iasenv.ksh file under <ias-install root>/ias/env. Please let me know if this helps.
Regards
Ganesh .R
Developer Technical Support
Sun Microsystems
http://www.sun.com/developers/support

Smpatch update ALERT: Failed to install patch 121616-02

I am getting various Failed to install patch alerts when doing smpatch update. Many patches are aparently applied successfuly, but others are not. I do not have Sun Support since it is my personal X86 box. Are other people getting these failures? If so, what is done to investigate / fix the problems? If I had support what would Sun recommend be done to correct the problem? Should smpatch always run clean with no errors? Regards.

I will post to the other forum as well, but I can't think of a more "general" Solaris discussion topic than how to / what to expect when applying patches. I am not sure I agree with your comment "it's best to only install the patches that are really needed". I thought smpatch update "decided" which patches are needed given the system it is run on.
Is your comment based upon best practices published somewhere? How do you as a sysAdmin decide which patches are really needed?
I would like to hear from the community how they patch their boxes and if smpatch is working for them, especially in a production environment. I have a stand alone system, but how are people in an environment with test systems patching? Are they using smpatch? In general, how are people keeping their systems updated, reliable, bug free and secure?
Regards,

Failed to install the patch 113886-38, 113887-38

Hi all,
I just tried to install the J2SE Solaris 9 Recommented Patch Cluster, while, when it come to install the patch 113886-38, 113887-38, it got an an error message:
Installing 113886-38...
Checking installed patches...
One or more patch packages included in
113886-38 are not installed on this system.
Patchadd is terminating.
Installing 113887-38...
Checking installed patches...
ERROR: This patch requires patch 113886-38
which has not been applied to the system.
Patchadd is terminating.
The O/S version info:
SunOS rtd5p02 5.9 Generic_118558-27 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-880
Our system was just upgraded from solaris 8 to solaris 9, and I donnt know why it was failed, appreciate if any idea about the cause.
Yukun

Hello Yukun,
The reason that patch 113887-38 is failing to install
is that patch 113886-38 has not been installed. As
this is a dependancy patch of 113887-38, this patch
will not install.
Please can you run the following commands and return
the output generated:
showrev -p | grep 113886-38
find . -name 113886-38
patchadd /patch_to_patch/113886-38
Regards,
Yup, my problem is the patch 113886-38 was failed to install.
The error message is:
================================
Installing 113886-38...
Checking installed patches...
One or more patch packages included in
113886-38 are not installed on this system.
Patchadd is terminating.
=================================

Failed to install a patch. 120445-01

I just started using "smpatch". Very cool. However, I have a single patch that keeps on popping up which won't install under any circumstance. Is there any way to disable this patch or get it to install?
I'm installing on a V440 with Solaris 9. Here's the error I'm getting:
Aug 9 21:56:12 boffo root: => Thread[Thread-18,5,main] <=Problem installing patches: Received a Manipulable event.
Aug 9 21:56:13 boffo root: => com.sun.patchpro.util.PatchBundleInstaller@a6997 <=Failed to install a patch. 120445-01
Aug 9 21:56:13 boffo patchadd utility failed. Reason code :0
Aug 9 21:56:13 boffo Checking installed patches...One or more patch packages included in 120445-01 are not installed on this system.Patchadd is terminating.
Aug 9 21:56:13 boffo root: [ID 702911 user.alert] => com.sun.patchpro.util.PatchBundleInstaller@a6997 <=Failed to install a patch. 120445-01
Aug 9 21:56:13 boffo patchadd utility failed. Reason code :0
Aug 9 21:56:13 boffo Checking installed patches...One or more patch packages included in 120445-01 are not installed on this system.Patchadd is terminating.
Aug 9 21:56:13 boffo root: => Thread[Thread-18,5,main] <=Problem installing patches: ALERT: Failed to install the patch {0}. 120445-01
ALERT: Failed to install the patch {0}. 120445-01

These are the only packages that don't start with "SUNW":
system      IPLTadcon                        Administration Server Console
system      IPLTadman                        Administration Server Documentation
system      IPLTadmin                        Administration Server
system      IPLTcons                         Console Client Base
system      IPLTdscon                        Directory Server Console
system      IPLTdsman                        Directory Server Documentation
system      IPLTdsr                          Directory Server (root)
system      IPLTdsu                          Directory Server (usr)
system      IPLTjss                          Network Security Services for Java
system      IPLTnls                          Nationalization Languages and Localization Support
system      IPLTnspr                         Portable Runtime Interface
system      IPLTnss                          Network Security Services
system      IPLTpldap                        PerLDAP
application NSCPcom                          Netscape Communicator

System fails to install win 7pro

good day all,
i transferred a working harddisk ,40GB, from one desktop A to another B, then went to the BIOS to set it as the first booting device. when i tried to install windows 7 pro on desktop B( hp compaq evo, 2GHZ, 40GB HDD, 512MB RAM) , after deleting the partitions and clicked next, i got this error message "windows cannot be installed on this disk, this computer's hardware may not support booting to this disk. Ensure that the disk's controller is enabled in the computer's BIOS menu". error code 0x800705AA.
presently i am stuck here.

>a) Would going into the same user in Safe Mode have fixed it?
not alone, unless the problem was with a component instead of an installer confusion in the temp folder.
>b) I gave up on clearing temp folders a long time ago because of a lack of results. Explain to me the steps of clearing temp folders, maybe I've always done it wrong
I usually leave mine alone too- well every now and then. just delete all the files from them you can (c:\docs & settings\user\local settings\temp, c:\temp, c:\windows\temp)
usually there's no problem but occasionally an installer will leave part of itself in temp where by odd coincidence (or not so odd, because there are relatively few install apps that systems use - wise and install shield probably 2 of the most used) has a file that's got the same name as one the new installer expects. so it starts reading from that one instead. now the whole install gets screwy.
>However I have seen some success with grabbing the hidden Install Wizard folder and dragging it to the desktop, doing the install, the putting it back.
yes, me too. saves time when troubleshooting and the app that fails to install keeps deleting the install files! :)
> The way I see it, just get on a new admin install the thing, then delete the user. Who cares "why?" if it works, right?
oh, i misunderstood. i thought you were advocating KEEPING that new admin user as the main user. that's what i mean is a pita having to move settings over from the old acct. to the new one... i guess that CAN work, sometimes, but not always. some apps (not sure if photoshop is among them) want you to install under the user account that will be running it.
just another tool to keep in the arsenal... :)

Recommended patch 125541-02 fails to install

Patch 125541-02 fails to install. When it is running patchadd perhaps, it complains that the dependency package SUNWthunderbird is not present. I am not inclined to search and add support for it unless it is necessary. I tried it five different hosts running Solaris 10. The results are the same.

I had exactly the same results on a Sun Blade running Sol 10 11/06. The patch will not install using update manager, or with smpatch add -i, or from the manually downloaded patch using patchadd.
The following requested patches have packages not installed on the system
Package SUNWthunderbird from directory SUNWthunderbird in patch 125541-02 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWthunderbird will not be applied to the system.

Patch 124171-01 fails to install

Patch 124171-01 fails to install on an Ultra-80 and a V210 models. I installed it manually to get the message that the "SUNWscnbase-r" package is not installed so the patch is aborted.
The Ultra-80 runs Solaris 10 release 03/2005. The V210 runs Solaris 10 01/2006. I typically load everything in the installs so this patch should not have been recommended to them.

root hypert /var/sadm/spool # smpatch analyze
124187-01 SunOS 5.10_x86: flash issue with SUNWscn-base due to broken package
Maybe the patchinfo wasn't specific enough?
root hypert /var/sadm/spool/124187-01.jar.dir/124187-01 # more patchinfo
PATCHINFOVERSION="1.0"
PATCHID=124187-01
PATCH_CORRECTS='BaseOS.SolarisCore-5.10'
PATCH_ARCH='i386'
PATCH_OS='SunOS'
PATCH_OSRELEASE='5.10'
PATCH_PROPERTIES='clientroot'
This seems to indicate all Solaris 10 systems would need this patch - but I don't know if UM uses this info when deciding which patches to recommend.

10.6.2 failed to install due to 'nfs error', audio no longer works

macbook pro, all other updates have installed just fine, except for 10.6.2
I get this in the log:
11/10/09 3:58:15 PM com.apple.kextcache410 Created mkext archive //System/Library/Caches/com.apple.kext.caches/Startup/Extensions.mkext.
11/10/09 3:58:15 PM com.apple.kextcache403 Failed to mount helper partition: error 0XF8DA000C (DA err# 0x0c).
11/10/09 3:58:15 PM com.apple.kextd10 kextcache error while updating / (error count: 4)
11/10/09 3:58:15 PM com.apple.kextcache403 /: trouble updating one or more helper partitions.
11/10/09 3:58:15 PM com.apple.kextd10 async child pid 403 exited with status 70
11/10/09 3:58:15 PM com.apple.kextd10 kextcache error while updating / (error count: 5)
11/10/09 3:58:15 PM installd376 PackageKit: Install Failed: (null)
Error Domain=PKInstallErrorDomain Code=121 UserInfo=0x104d22740 "An error occurred while updating system extension information." Underlying Error=(Error Domain=NSPOSIXErrorDomain Code=70 "The operation couldn’t be completed. Stale NFS file handle") {
NSLocalizedDescription = "An error occurred while updating system extension information.";
NSUnderlyingError = "Error Domain=NSPOSIXErrorDomain Code=70 \"The operation couldn\U2019t be completed. Stale NFS file handle\"";
arguments = (
"-update-volume",
nothing is mounted (i rebooted before applying). not sure why it's giving that NFS error. it's consistent tho.. if i reboot and try the manual install of the patch, I get the same error.
after the failed patch "installed" it left my sound not working... so far everything else appears to work. any thoughts on fixing this are appreciated. i ran diskutil and 'fixed perms' and 'verified disk' ... patch still fails.

Try reinstalling the patch. If you get all the way through the installation, then see if your sound works. If not, then I suggest you do a repair install of Sno by installing Sno over Sno as in an upgrade install. Such an install, while usually very safe, still is an install so be appropriated backed up if you proceed.

Failed to install Creative Cloud desktop error code 1 Windows 8.1

I just recently tried to begin a trial of creative cloud in order to get access to photoshop. I really need photoshop for my school because of how powerful it is and the tools is offers. A couple weeks ago I tried to download and install creative cloud for windows 8 64-bit, and the download begins, but once it reaches around 50%, it raises an error message saying "We've encountered the following issues: Creative Cloud desktop failed to install (error code 1)". I was having problems with the internet at the time so I just naturally assumed it was the cause. So I went ahead and gave it a couple of days before I tried again. When I tried again I received the same error message at the same time. I continued to look around for a solution and trying it everyday but I have had absolutely no luck with it, and honestly am getting quite frustrated with it. I have looked everywhere for a solution, I tried the adobe clenup tool, I have checked to make sure I don't have any previous versions of adobe products on my computer, and even tried installing it as an admin in safe mode, and still nothing. I have no idea what to do next, but I know that I have to get ahold of photoshop, one way or another, and it must have the professional tools included in the creative cloud edition. Please tell me there is a simple solution and I have been blind this entire time. If there is no solution, can someone direct me to another software similar to photoshop that has access to the plug-in dDo? (I am in game development and have heard how powerful dDo is and have been dying to use it. I have also been anxious to get photoshop, but it doesn't appear to be possible without the creative cloud desktop app).

Link for Download & Install & Setup & Activation problems may help
-Online Chat http://www.adobe.com/support/download-install/supportinfo/

HP C1680 fails to install Software

Can you please help
I have just reinstalled my operating system Windows 7 6- bit OS and needed to reinstall my printer HP Photosmart C6180 All in One. When I first got my new PC( Dell XPS 501L windows 7 Intel core i5. 243M 2.40GHz) I originally install the whole package with no issues.
after the reinstall of the OS, this is issue I was I getting when I tried to reinstalled the HP application (AIO_CDA_FSW_Full_Win_WW_130_140.exe )
Error message:-
C:\Users\andylouey\AppData\Local\Temp\7zS4864\setup\HPzPNP.ice.
I have done the following:
Tried to install from an old download of the software. Result Failed to install message as above.
Tried the original install CD and also tried to use them in various compatibility modes. Result Failed.
Downloaded the critical updates from HP solved the above error message result the above error message was solved.
Downloaded the latest install software program for my HP printer from the HP website tried again to install failed
Ran the HP Scan doctor reported that the printer drivers are all working asked it to run the scan program it reported that it need the full install of the C1680 software to run this
I got the download again ran it. It extracts the file then just disappears and looking at the task manager there is not install running. So again failed
For the second time I downloaded the HP installer network printer wizard but this failed and just keeps going round in circles> It finishes the download gets to the extracting point and then goes back to the identify printer( which is listed) then goes back once again and downloads the install software.
Other steps I have taken. I used the old installation disk to do a complete uninstall of all the drivers and software using Utilities> CCC> Uninstall_ L2.bat . This wored and uninstalled the printer and drivers and I think any remaining software. I also deleted all the %TEMP% files that my Laptop would allow.
Then once again I I used the install wizard first without the USB cable disconnected then the wizard asked me to plug it in. I plugged it in and HP Wizard found the printer and downloaded the appropriate software completed the download and extracted it and then NOTHING.
I have also downloaded the critical update:-
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/softwareDownloadIndex?softwareitem=mp-126392-2&cc=uk&dlc=en&lc=en...
Can you suggest a solution help. In my view I need to start from scratch and remove all traces of any HP software and drivers and start over. My only issue with this I have done this and still have the same issues. If I go to Microsoft uninstall utility there isn’t anything to uninstall.
Thanks in advance for your reply.
PS. HP wizard has finished downloading for the fourth time and looping to discovering the device again :-( HELP!!!!!!!!
Thanks in adbance for your replies Andy

Hi
Thank you for your reply and your advice and help
If you look at my help request aboveI have described that I have done your suggetion and yet there are still traces of HP on my hard drive and I am still haveing the same issues.
Below are the steps you have referred to which I covered in my original request :-
Other steps I have taken. I used the old installation disk to do a complete uninstall of all the drivers using CCC> Utilities and Uninstall_L3 . I also deleted all the %TEMP% files (7z) that my Laptop would allow.
Then once again I I used the install wizard first wit the USB cable disconnected then the wizard asked me to plug it in. I plugged it in and HP Wizard found the printer and downloaded the appropriate software completed the download and extracted it and then NOTHING. Except the drivers were installed and the printer was shown in the devices and printers.
I have also downloaded the critical update:-
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/softwareDownloadIndex?softwareitem=mp-126392-2&cc=uk&dlc=en&lc=en...
Can you suggest a solution help. In my view I need to start from scratch and remove all traces of any HP software and drivers and start over. My only issue with this I have done this and still have the same issues. If I go to Microsoft uninstall utility there isn’t anything to uninstall.
I can print to the printer both wirelessly and via the USB port. But the Solution center will not install just keeps looping. ie idenifies the printer downloads the latest sofware and extracts it then just dissapears of the screen. Nothing comes up and there are no HP programs running in the applications task manager and no processes either.
Thank you in advance for your reply. Regards Andy

Solaris 10 fails to install on Compaq ML370

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for