Solaris 10 SMA is dumping core. Have you installed net-snmp?

It's only happening on afew of the many sparc Solaris 10 servers I support. Oracle no longer supports SMA and has suggested downloading and installing "publicly available 'net-snmp' software". I'm reluctant to download and install open source; the review and approval process in my environment is onerous.
Since net-snmp is bundled with Solaris 11, I'm wondering if it is possible to install Solaris 11 packages on a Solaris 10 server (and net-snmp in particular). If so, perhaps someone can provide tips?

The package formats are not the same between these both release of Solaris. You can still trying to extract the files and then install it in your Solaris 10 machine but this is highly unrecommended and of course unsupported. And I'm not sure that it will work.

Similar Messages

Type of SSD Have You Installed???

Hello all - I have a T61 with Win Vista Pro and want to find out from those with a similar configuration, what type, brand and size SSD have you installed? How easy it was and how does it continue to operate.
My current HD is 164g and getting quite crowded and slow...
Thanks... bo1953
T61, 6465, Vista

[Edited to correct typo in text. AG]
Hello,
I have had good results with Corsair, Crucial, Intel, Kingston and MyDigitalSSD SSDs in my ThinkPads. In particular, I have used both a 64GB Crucial SSD and an 80GB Intel SSD in my T61p and they both seemed to work fine. A couple of generalizations:
As hausman pointed out, the latest generation of SSDs operate at faster read/write speeds than the T61-series supports, which is somewhat fixable by installing a modified (non-Lenovo/IBM) BIOS. I have not done this myself, but from all accounts it seems to work well. Even if you do not choose to perform this unofficial upgrade, you can still get a faster SSD that operates at the latest speeds. After all, you might one day get a new computer which fully supports that speed, and you'll be able to re-use the SSD purchased for the T61 in that unit.
Most SSDs are sized for laptop computers (even those which go into desktops) and are the same 2.5" size as their HDD counterparts. However, 2.5" SATA SSDs come in two heights, the standard 9.5mm height and the shorter 7mm height (used for subnotebooks, ultrabooks and other very portable computers).
You might want to consider getting a 7mm high SSD (which sometimes come with a 2.5mm spacer) and should fit fine into the T61's drive bay. There's typically no difference in pricing that I've seen for the two heights, since the SSDs themselves are actually circuitboards which are even less than 7mm high—the only difference is in the plastic or metal shroud which surrounds them.
The reason for doing this is, again, future-proofing: It could be that your next notebook computer only has a 7mm high drive bay, and if you want to re-use your SSD with it, you would need to remove it from its shroud (a warranty-voiding move) and put some kind of insulation around it. If you go with a 7mm high SSD with a 2.5mm spacer, you can just remove the spacer and the SSD will fit into that new computer without having to do any additional work.
Any SSD that you decide on will be faster than any HDD you install in your T61, but with a little extra planning, you might be able to purchase an SSD that will be re-usable for a longer time.
Regards,
Aryeh Goretsky
I am a volunteer and neither a Lenovo nor a Microsoft employee. • Dexter is a good dog • Dexter je dobrý pes
S230u (3347-4HU) • X220 (4286-CTO) • W510 (4318-CTO) • W530 (2441-4R3) • X100e (3508-CTO) • X120e (0596-CTO) • T61p (6459-CTO) • T43p (2678-H7U) • T42 (2378-R4U) • T23 (2648-LU7)
Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español Русскоязычное Сообщество

Have you installed RSP yet?

Hi All,
For those of you who do not already know about Remote Support Platform for SAP Business One I suggest you take some time to read up on this
great free (with active maintenance contract) solution from SAP. Details can be found here
RSP has been around now for a number of years and in order to take advantage of its capabilities and to further optimize our customers operations we make it mandatory to use it.
Do you know that:
RSP gives an quick overview of your customer’ installation
RSP automates end to end process of database upload
RSP can proactively detect issues in customer’s installation
RSP can automate fix delivery process
RSP provides central reporting system to partner in order to monitor all customer’s installations
A common question is that RSP is some sort of big brother application, I want to assure you here and now that this is absolutely not the case. As you can imagine in SAP, we take data protection seriously, very seriously and are governed by Data Protect Agreements so your data is secure and confidential.
I wanted to give you some heads up about important changes to support service delivery in SAP Business One Product Support which will begin 1st June 2013. Two important changes will come into effect and I would like to inform you about these that you may take proactive measures to ensure continued non-disruptive support.
If you do not already have RSP installed on your customer system, then please reach out to your support provider; request them to install it for you. Installation takes 30-60 minutes in most cases)
As you know we operate on a SAP - Partner - Customer model. Beginning June 1st it will be mandatory to install, configure & upload the system status report to SAP.
System Status Report Mandatory for support services
It will be mandatory to install, configure and upload the System Status Report (SSR) from Remote Support Platform (RSP) for SAP Business One in order to receive support for messages of a technical nature (upgrades, performance & crashes, etc). Failure to upload the SSR to SAP will result in unnecessary delays in resolving your issues and we would kindly urge you to take proactive measures now to avoid this. We recommend scheduling the SSR task to run every two weeks minimum to receive the most recent information. Should you face any issues installing RSP, then please open a support message with the component (SBO-RSP) and we will be happy to assist you.
Database uploads only via RSP
SAP Business One Support will only accept database uploads to SAP via remote support platform for SAP Business One. In certain exceptional circumstances STFP may be used but this will constitute a minority of cases. Please take due consideration of this important change to our processes over the next weeks and please plan accordingly to install, configure and upload the System Status Report to SAP. By being prepared now, it will avoid any delays in the processing of your customer support messages.
I encourage you now to begin a discussion and I will try to answer as many of your questions as possible.
With Kind Regards,
Paul Finneran
SAP Business One Product Support

Hi Dwarak,
The purpose of linking the SAP Business License file in RSP is only to allow RSP reading out the installation and system number of your SAP Business One installation. However you may skip this step while executing the setup wizard and configure it later once you execute the Initialisation wizard.
If you have to enter proxy credentials depends on the proxy configuration itself, e.g. can you browse the Internet only if you applied such credentials into the browser?
Also the proxy settings you may configure it later while executing the Initialisation wizard.
RSP requires an Internet Connection in order to establish connections to SAP's backend and optionally your SAP partner backend via Internet in order to receive lastest RSP Tasks and optionally transfer task results. (Don't worry, no task result will be transferred as long you did not give explicit permission to do so after you reviewed the content)
And just for the Internet connection the proxy settings are required in case a proxy got set up within the environment where remote support platform for SAP Business One got installed.
PS: Please ensure to get latest version and PL of RSP installed (currently RSP 3.1 PL 4). It is in general combatible to all Business One versions.
Best regards
Mario Schoenberg
SAP Business One Support

Solaris 10 Xorg dumps core

Hello.
I've installed Solaris 10 on an old x86 machine based around the AMD K6-2 CPU (~420 MHz), plus 3dfx Voodoo Banshee graphics card. Whether I run Xorg/Xserver or related utilities (such as xorgcfg and xorgconfig) from /usr/X11/bin, it eventually terminates with a message "Illegal Instruction - core dumped". Is this a hardware incompatibility problem I'm experiencing? Probably, any possible workarounds you could suggest to launch X and CDE on my machine?
Thank you.

Here the same behavior, unfortunately,
AMD K6-2 CPU (450MHz), Solaris 10 10/08 (u6)
SIGILL from /usr/X11/bin/xorgcfg (also from Xorg, scanpci, xorgconfig).
SIGILL from xorgconfig occurs later after answered some questions.
Also installing the currently latest patch 125720-32 does not solve this problem.
It's a pity. The announced alliance sun - amd seams only to be a nice hype.
Here it seams that special intel opcodes are delivered to us, thanx a lot!
Have a nice day.

Have you installed Source Connect?

Platform: Windows.   Audition CS6.   iLok key registered. Source Connect Standard 3.1 on 15-Day Free Trial.
Here's where I am with it:
The SC software appears to have downloaded correctly and I'm able to see it on the VST listing in my Audition multitrack. I can log into SC. Here are my issues:
1.     Once I log into the SC window, my cursor changes to a strange icon. Sort of an angular infinity sign with a red slash through it, but only within the multitrack window.
2.    When I send an echo test, I hear nothing back.
3.    When I send an echo test, I get an error message about the Q Manager that SC tells me to ignore.   (uh... OK).
What do I need to do?

Hi Dwarak,
The purpose of linking the SAP Business License file in RSP is only to allow RSP reading out the installation and system number of your SAP Business One installation. However you may skip this step while executing the setup wizard and configure it later once you execute the Initialisation wizard.
If you have to enter proxy credentials depends on the proxy configuration itself, e.g. can you browse the Internet only if you applied such credentials into the browser?
Also the proxy settings you may configure it later while executing the Initialisation wizard.
RSP requires an Internet Connection in order to establish connections to SAP's backend and optionally your SAP partner backend via Internet in order to receive lastest RSP Tasks and optionally transfer task results. (Don't worry, no task result will be transferred as long you did not give explicit permission to do so after you reviewed the content)
And just for the Internet connection the proxy settings are required in case a proxy got set up within the environment where remote support platform for SAP Business One got installed.
PS: Please ensure to get latest version and PL of RSP installed (currently RSP 3.1 PL 4). It is in general combatible to all Business One versions.
Best regards
Mario Schoenberg
SAP Business One Support

MOVED: Have you installed Vista on K9N Platinum

This topic has been moved to Operating Systems.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=98052.0

In installed FM 7.2 on Vista. It works ... sort of! What I find is that all the normal functionality is there BUT, if for some reason you hold the shift key a little too long (while selecting text for example), or if you hold down a mouse button too long, FM crashes out big time. So, save your work regularly and be prepared for a few frustrating FM crashes. I've tried this combination on only one PC, so I can't verify whether it's unique to my system, but it is certainly repeatable.

Solaris 10 x86 Won't Startup After Install - system just restarts itself?

Ok, I'm another one of those wacky Vista people. I have a Dell Latitude D630 running a dual boot scenario with Vista Ultimate and Solaris 10.
I had plenty of issues getting that working but it does work. Vista WILL boot. Solaris won't boot. Solaris failsafe will boot.
Now the issue is....
Solaris will not boot. When I select it from the GRUB menu, I see some text that flashes really quickly before the system restarts. It's the same text that I see when I boot failsafe mode.
Something to the effect of Sun Solaris.... blah blah....Subject To License Terms and Conditions....
So it's as if it's trying to boot Solaris, but for some reason it just restarts the system. The only thing that works is failsafe mode and Vista.
How can I troubleshoot this issue when I can only get in failsafe?
Please note I'm an IT professional (so I'm quite capable) but I have ZERO Solaris experience and limited (very limited) Linux experience so break it down for me if you will.
Thank you in advance!
SPECIFIC DETAILS:
*1. Solaris 10 x86 Platform*
*2. Windows Vista Ultimate*
*3. Dell Latitude D630 Notebook, 2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB RAM*
*4. (1) HDD with a Vista and Solaris partition*
*5. I have tried installing Solaris 10 (3) times to resolve. To no avail.*
*7. Failsafe mode does boot.*
*8. Grub looks like this:*
kernel /platform/i86pc/multiboot
modul /platform/i86pc/boot_archive
Edited by: derrickonline on May 13, 2008 4:53 PM
Edited by: derrickonline on May 13, 2008 4:57 PM

I should have searched the forums first. This was the solution to my issue....
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?messageID=10249826

Terminal server does not have any installed licenses

Good morning! Faced with a some trouble while configuring Terminal Server (Windows Server 2012 based). I selected licensing mode "Per User" and now I see this message:
“The Remote Desktop Session Host server is in Per User licensing mode and No Redirector Mode, but license server “server name” does not have any installed licenses with the following attributes:
Product version: Windows Server 2008 or Windows Server 2008 R2
Licensing mode: Per User
License type: RDS CALs”
So this is trial using of terminal server - I have 25 days yet but already today I can't connect to server using RDP. There is an error message about absent licensing server. How can I activate licenses in trial mode? Thank you for support.

Hi,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
From the error description it seems that your issue caused by setting up different Licensing mode. We need to install the proper RDS CAL on the License server. If the license server has installed licenses of the other mode, changing the licensing mode
for the terminal server may also resolve the issue.
To change the Licensing mode we can use RD Licensing diagnoser or by PowerShell command.
To change the licensing mode on RDSH/RDVH:
$obj = gwmi -namespace "Root/CIMV2/TerminalServices" Win32_TerminalServiceSetting
$obj.ChangeMode(value) - Value can be 2 - per Device, 4 - Per user
Please refer below article for information.
RD Licensing Configuration on Windows Server 2012
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2013/09/20/rd-licensing-configuration-on-windows-server-2012.aspx
Have you installed License server on Server 2012 and you have RDS CAL of Server 2008 R2?
If that’s the case then first you need to purchase the RDS CAL for server 2012 and then you can configure on server 2012 because server 2012\R2 RDS CAL can work with lower version OS but Server 2008 R2 RDS CAL can’t work on Server 2012\R2.
Please check computability matrix.
RDS and TS CAL Interoperability Matrix
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/14988.rds-and-ts-cal-interoperability-matrix.aspx
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki

Error installing Net::SSLeay to get TLS working in napp-it

Hi,
I'm using napp-it on my Solaris 11 Express server and to get email alerts through gmail I have to install Net::SMTP::TLS.
This requires two other packages, Net::SSLeay and IO::Socket::SSL.
Installing Net::SSLeay failes with:
How can I solve this?
cpan> install Net::SSLeay
Running install for module Net::SSLeay
Running make for F/FL/FLORA/Net-SSLeay-1.36.tar.gz
Is already unwrapped into directory /root/.cpan/build/Net-SSLeay-1.36
CPAN.pm: Going to build F/FL/FLORA/Net-SSLeay-1.36.tar.gz
Cannot determine perl version info from lib/Net/SSLeay.pm
Cannot determine license info from lib/Net/SSLeay.pm
*** Found OpenSSL-0.9.8o installed in /usr
*** Be sure to use the same compiler and options to compile your OpenSSL, perl,
and Net::SSLeay. Mixing and matching compilers is not supported.
Do you want to run external tests?
These tests will fail if you do not have network connectivity. [n]
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
Writing Makefile for Net::SSLeay
Writing MYMETA.yml and MYMETA.json
cp lib/Net/SSLeay.pm blib/lib/Net/SSLeay.pm
AutoSplitting blib/lib/Net/SSLeay.pm (blib/lib/auto/Net/SSLeay)
blib/lib/Net/SSLeay.pm: some names are not unique when truncated to 8 characters:
directory blib/lib/auto/Net/SSLeay:
do_https3.al, do_https2.al, do_https4.al, do_https.al truncate to do_https
do_httpx3.al, do_httpx2.al, do_httpx4.al truncate to do_httpx
get_https.al, get_https3.al, get_https4.al, get_http.al, get_http3.al, get_http4.al, get_httpx.al, get_httpx3.al, get_httpx4.al truncate to get_http
head_https.al, head_https3.al, head_https4.al, head_http.al, head_http3.al, head_http4.al, head_httpx.al, head_httpx3.al, head_httpx4.al truncate to head_htt
post_https.al, post_https3.al, post_https4.al, post_http.al, post_http3.al, post_http4.al, post_httpx.al, post_httpx3.al, post_httpx4.al truncate to post_htt
put_https.al, put_https3.al, put_https4.al, put_http.al, put_http3.al, put_http4.al, put_httpx.al, put_httpx3.al, put_httpx4.al truncate to put_http
ssl_read_all.al, ssl_read_until.al, ssl_read_CRLF.al truncate to ssl_read
ssl_write_all.al, ssl_write_CRLF.al truncate to ssl_writ
tcp_read_all.al, tcp_read_until.al, tcp_read_CRLF.al truncate to tcp_read
tcp_write_all.al, tcp_write_CRLF.al truncate to tcp_writ
cp lib/Net/SSLeay/Handle.pm blib/lib/Net/SSLeay/Handle.pm
/usr/bin/perl "-Iinc" /usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib/ExtUtils/xsubpp -typemap /usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib/ExtUtils/typemap -typemap typemap SSLeay.xs > SSLeay.xsc && mv SSLeay.xsc SSLeay.c
cc -c -I/usr/include -I/usr/inc32 -I/usr/kerberos/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TS_ERRNO -O2 -g -DVERSION=\"1.36\" -DXS_VERSION=\"1.36\" -KPIC "-I/usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib/i86pc-solaris-64int/CORE" SSLeay.c
cc: unrecognized option `-KPIC'
In file included from SSLeay.xs:80:
/usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib/i86pc-solaris-64int/CORE/perl.h:2838:22: math.h: No such file or directory
SSLeay.xs: In function `ssleay_verify_callback_invoke':
SSLeay.xs:157: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
SSLeay.xs:164: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
SSLeay.xs: In function `ssleay_ctx_passwd_cb_new':
SSLeay.xs:233: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
SSLeay.xs:235: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
SSLeay.xs: In function `ssleay_ctx_passwd_cb_get':
SSLeay.c:6426: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
SSLeay.c: In function `XS_Net__SSLeay_EVP_add_digest':
SSLeay.c:6532: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
SSLeay.c: In function `XS_Net__SSLeay_EVP_sha256':
SSLeay.c:6555: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
make: *** [SSLeay.o] Error 1
/usr/gnu/bin/make -- NOT OK
Running make test
Can't test without successful make
Running make install
make had returned bad status, install seems impossible

Thanks but it didnt help, same error even after changing this.
Dubbelchecked the changes just to be sure I didnt screw up on my end, it was /usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib/*bold*i86pc*bold*-solaris-64int/Config.pm and not /usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib/*bold*sun4*bold*-solaris-64int/Config.pm
I then ran
sudo perl -MCPAN -e shell
followed by
clean Net::SSLeay
install Net::SSLeay
and I still got the same error.
Anything else that could be causing this?

Solaris 9 + Checkpoint R55 CORE DUMPING, HELP!

Here are the list of revisions I have installe donto the machine:
Solaris 9 (core install) (09/04)
Checkpoint R55 (HFA 15)
Recommended 9 (07/18/05).
When we are running the commands 'cpstart' and 'cpstop' the Solaris 9 OS follows by doing 2/3 core dumps each time. We have redone this box to check if its a fault with the install but it still core dumps each time with use the 'cpstart' and 'cpstop' commands to start and stop the Checkpoint R55 software.
>
# cpstop
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
VPN-1/FW-1 stopped
SVN Foundation: cpd stopped....... etc.
Has anyone got and ideas or suggestions?
its has been suggested to send this onto our Solaris VAR for interrogation to have the dumps put through some sort of analyser, but we have no support (media kit only) HELP!

we're also unable to connect to the box using the r55 checkpoint software (if anyone knows about this)
"....make sure your server is up and running and that you're defined as a GUI client".
it WAS working before appliying the Recommended_9 patch

Application dumps core on solaris with BDB 4.6.21

Hi,
my application dumps core on solaris during the appication startup:
The solaris box detail is :
SunOS wcturgo3 5.10 Generic_137111-08 sun4v sparc SUNW,Netra-T5220.
I compiled the BDB with the following configuration:
./buildall.sh -p solaris -c cc -x CC -m gmake
the core file loks like :
fdc28c68 __db_pthread_mutex_init (50878, 0, 13, 0, ffbfca18, 0) + 88
fdca3bec __mutex_open (50878, 271638, 2058000, fdd47d1c, 271490, 0) + 224
fdce56ec __env_open (50878, 0, 880081, 8a0081, 0, 0) + 3bc
fdc206f4 int DbEnv::open(const char*,unsigned,int) (502f0, 0, 880081, 0, 502f0, fdce50c4) + 5c
fcb12824 void DbXml::Manager::initTempDbEnv(DbEnv*) (502d8, 503e0, 0, 15540, fe03c9f8, aa878) + 144
fcb11ea0 DbXml::Manager::Manager #Nvariant 1(unsigned) (502d8, 0, fe2ae760, 15540, fe03c9f8, 502d8) + 430
fcb059ec DbXml::XmlManager::XmlManager #Nvariant 1() (fe3697ec, fcdef0c0, fcdee994, 40, 13080, 0) + 24
fe234d68 NemiConfigToolInit::NemiConfigToolInit #Nvariant 1() (fe3697d4, 0, 0, 0, 0, fe36957c) + 60
fe2ae760 ???????? (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
fe2aeb04 ???????? (0, fc665440, aca5c, fe0272cc, fc665400, fe369544)
fe2f77d0 _init    (ff3f40fc, ff3f5a70, 2b3f4, 0, ff3f4910, 821) + f8
ff3c5280 call_init (60c10081, 1, ff2f0788, fe2f76d8, ff3f4910, ffdfffff) + 16c
ff3c47e8 setup (200000, 2801, 602, ff3f40fc, 60c10001, 446) + 1568
ff3d35cc _setup   (10034, ffffffff, 0, ff3b0000, ffffffff, ffffffff) + 40c
ff3b8480 rtboot (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 88
00000000 ???????? (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
i tried using dbxml build with this BDB. i was able to execute one or two commands without the dbxml dumping core.
But my application dumps core during startup as sigbus (memory alignment issue).
I googled and found that people have faced problems of sigbus on solaris. when i checked with solaris, it seems that if the solaris box has 137111-0 to 137111-08 will face core dumps due to memory alignment issue which they say is because the application has misaligned mutex.
please suggest what should i do .
a)apply the sloaris kernel patch to temporary solution(as they claim the patch for thsi problem will give temporary solution .)
b) i have to compile the BDB with different options.

Hello,
You need to apply the patch below on top of Berkeley
DB 4.6.21:
*** dbinc/mutex_int.h     Tue Jul 01 15:03:43 2008 +1000
--- dbinc/mutex_int.h     Tue Jul 01 16:11:06 2008 +1000
*** 616,621 ****
--- 616,623 ----
#ifdef HAVE_MUTEX_SPARC_GCC_ASSEMBLY
typedef unsigned char tsl_t;
+
+ #define     MUTEX_ALIGN     8
#ifdef LOAD_ACTUAL_MUTEX_CODE
This corrects a Solaris-only alignment problem.
Thanks,
Sandra

Getting slapd to dump core when installed as a non-root users on linux

Doesn anyone know how to allow slapd do dump core when running on linux(redhat as4) while being installed as a non-root user?
I have tried the normal route of setting core to unlimited and that user to unlimited also in limits.conf.
I can do a kill -11 $pid with an instance running as root to get a core but no luck with an instance as a non-root user.

I forgot to mention that I'm running 6.1.

How do you install the NT domain connector onto the Directory Server Integrated Edition 5.0 for Solaris?

The NT installation lists the NT Domain connector as an option. The Solaris version doesn't. I spoke briefly with a project manager at Sun who said putting an NT Domain connector onto a Directory Server on Solaris was possible, but I'm not sure how.

You'll have to install the NT connector on an NT machine. The Join Engine that joins this connector can reside on Solaris.

My MacBook Pro, 1.83 GHz Intel Core Duo gives me an error message during Lion install. My Intel Duo Core is not an Intel Duo Core and cannot install Lion. I already have Snow Leopard what is the problem with Lion?

My MacBook Pro, 1.83 GHz Intel Core Duo gives me an error message during Lion install. My Intel Duo Core is not an Intel Duo Core and cannot install Lion. I already have Snow Leopard what is the problem with Lion?

You need a "Core 2 Duo" for lion, and I'm guessing you only have a "Core Duo" My wife's macbook is also a "Core Duo" and has Snow Leapord, but cannot install Lion.....

How could you install 10g R2 Db EE using containers for Solaris?

Do you know if there is a particular procedure in order to have my installation using Solaris' containers?
First of all, what is a container for Solaris?
Please could you give a reference to read about it?
Thank you.
Paola
: (

Hello Madrid!:
My Oracle´s hero!, your are always a leader for us, the dbas who have just one passion talking about databases: Oracle.
Well It is going to be hard, because I am not only installing Oracle inside a Solaris container but also migrating from Sybase to Oracle!
But again I am acting as a leader, and being woman it is more difficult. I hope that I can see you later, in a course again, but it could be, at the end of this year, because I am not going to be in Mexico City, I am now studying Sybase in order to convert all the dbs to Oracle. I have already installed successfully with your recommendations. You are perfect.
c u later my favorite OCM. I insist, what a beautiful last name you have.
Paola.
8 ) (wearing glasses)

Solaris 10 SMA is dumping core. Have you installed net-snmp?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for