Solaris 10 vs Solaris Express

Hi,
I'm a newbie here. My basic question follows: what is the difference between Solaris and Open Solaris(Solaris Express)? Which of them would you suggest for building a java development environment?
Thx.
gigo

Actually there are actually 3 versions. Solaris 10, Solaris express and open solaris.
Solaris 10 is the production version.
Solaris express is snapshots of the solaris 11 development work.
Theres also solaris express developer environment (SXDE) which is solaris express with the developer tools preinstalled.
Open solaris is the community project where the real development takes place.
As a development environment I would probably recommend going with SXDE but if your apps are going to be deployed in production on solaris 10 boxes, you probably need a solaris 10 box for deployment testing..

Similar Messages

Solaris 9, Solaris Management Console ISSUE

Solaris 9, Solaris Management Console ISSUE
I have Solaris 9 installed and I am unable to use the Solaris Management console.
I have managed to start it:
/etc/init.d/init.wbem start
/etc/init.d/init.wbem status -> shows it's running
But if I try browser with the link http:// host:898, I have got the following error:
"A web version of the Solaris Management Console is not available at this time."
any Idea why?

Are you running Trusted Extensions? What patch cluster are you on? What toolbox are you opening?

Bundle Patch1 is now available for Solaris (SPARC), Solaris (x86-64), AIX

[OTN |http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/oem/enterprise-manager/downloads/index.html?origref=http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/oem/grid-control/index.html] Hi All,
EM Binaries updated with bundle patch1 are now available on OTN
OMS and Management Agents for platform ::: Solaris (SPARC), Solaris (x86-64), and IBM AIX (64-bit)
Management Agents for platform::: HP-UX, or HP-UX Itanium
The BP1 workbook is updated with various use-cases specific to these platform. We strongly recommend you to follow the instruction from the workbook to apply BP1 patches. If you have any doubts feel free to drop me an email.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24628_01/doc.121/e35229/toc.htm
Regards
Akanksha

Oracle Instant Client was a "feature" introduced with Oracle 10g. There is no 9i version.
Code that links with Oracle 9i libraries should be able to be linked with Instant Client 10gR2.
The resulting application will be able to connect to databases from Oracle 8.1 onwards.

Help for solar battery, solar panel, solar charger!

Hi to all,
a solar battery = solar charger=solar panel ?? Today, my friend argue with me about the difference between *solar battery*, *solar panel* and *solar charger*... Is there anybody who can tell me the difference between them?? And does anyone have any experience with an easy to use solar charger than can be used to charge a laptop battery? I'm trying to help a friend out and i've got no experience with these.
I really appreciate, thanks!

No experience here.....but I did a little Googling and came up with this...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell
....and for shopping...
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/10/7-portable-solar-laptop-chargers-worth-c onsidering.php

Solaris 8 Megaraid Express 200 ;-(

I was having trouble installing Solaris for intel on my megaraid 466 (Express 200) raid controller. I installed an adaptec 2940U2W that I borrowed from another machine, and Solaris installed without a hitch. I didn't even have to download special drivers, solaris came with 'em! If you're looking for a good SCSI card to use with Solaris, choose adaptec. I have also heard that Solaris 8 works great with the newer adaptec 29160 cards too!

There shouldn't be a problem as long as the system has the required
memory and hard disk space. There may be some issues with driver
support for older peripherals. Solaris 8 has limited support for ISA cards
such as Network Interface Cards (NIC).
I would suggest taking a look at the Hardware Compatibility List (HCL)
on www.access1.sun.com to make sure the peripherals in the system'
are supported.
Another option would be try and get hold of an older version of Solaris,
such as Solaris 7.

Solaris 10/Solaris Express on Asus Z80K

Hi,
I am trying to install Solaris on an Asus Z80K (AMD64, Nvidia nforce2 chipset). The booting starts but fails quickly with this message:
SumOS Secondary Boot Version 4.0.2
prom_panic: kmem_free block already free
Entering boot debugger:
[139689]:
The posted message comes from the solaris express boot CD. The solaris 10 boot CD also prints the same message (the debug address might have been different thougth)
Any ideas as to what could be wrong ?

Me too! I'm actually installing Solaris 10 x86 from a Jumpstart server (ultra 10) onto v20z servers. I'm getting and IP address from the Jumpstart server and snoop says it's looking for bootevn.rc which I can't find under /tftpboot. I have found an article that states you must have rpld running and it's not. This could be my issue.

Installing Oracle 10.2.0.2 on Solaris 11 (Solaris Express) x86

Hi!
I have a problem with installing oracle on Solaris 11. When I ran installation program I got a message like this: "Wrong version of OS. The version must be 10".
Then program finished its work.
Is it possible to install Oracle 10.2.0.2 (or another version) on Solaris 11?

Solaris 11 is not certified with 10g R2, that's why you getting error.
Check link for more details => Certify - Oracle's Certification Matrices
Virag

Is there a way to undelete files in solaris, either solaris 8 or solaris 10

Hi Everyone,
Want to check with you whether any option available to undelete a file in solaris8 or solaris10. Please let me know.
Thanks everyone,
Lakshmana Immidi.

Maybe, but mostly no. If you do a Google search you will see many ways to undelete files, but all are based on a number of assumptions:
1. You are not using ZFS. Most of these methods work with UFS or ext2/ext3.
2. You stop immediately upon accidentally deleting the file. A multiuser system is continually generating files, whether from users or from temporary processes that are running all the time. Any disk blocks your original file was on may get over-written very quickly by new files. Inodes of the files may get re-used, and inodes don't contain the name of the file they reference.
If using ZFS on Solaris 10, using snapshots is the best way to preserve user files. You can roll back to a previous snapshot, or even just go to the directory the snapshot is stored in and copy the file over. You can set up a script to take snapshots at various times to ensure you always have a fairly recent copy. You can also take incremental snapshots so you don't have to copy tons of data with each snapshot.

LDAP over SSL for Solaris 9 / Solaris 10

I have successfully configured Solaris-10 clients to use Windows 2003 R2 Active Directory for LDAP authentication over SSL. However, my production environment is still running on Solaris-9. I am able to make Kerberos and ldapsearch working on Solaris-9, but I am still NOT able to use PuTTY to make authentication with AD.
I reviewed all my steps that I configured on Solaris-10, but somewhat I could not make it work on Solaris-9. If anybody sucessfully deployed on Solaris-9, please advices! Any helps greatly appreciated.
Here are what I got so far on Solaris-9
=======================================================
KERBEROS
=======================================================
#getent passwd aduser
aduser:1000:1000:aduser:/export/home/aduser:/bin/sh
#kinit [email protected]
Password for [email protected]:
#klist
Ticket cache: /tmp/krb5cc_0
Default principal: [email protected]
Valid starting Expires Service principal
Fri Jan 04 17:22:34 2008 Sat Jan 05 03:22:34 2008 krbtgt/[email protected]
renew until Fri Jan 11 17:22:34 2008
=======================================================
LDAPSEARCH / SSL
=======================================================
#ldapsearch -v -h sundc1.consoto.com -p 636 -Z -P /var/ldap/cert8.db -D cn=administrator,cn=users,dc=consoto,dc=com -w - -b "dc=consoto,dc=com" -v -s base "objectclass=*"
Enter bind password:
ldapsearch: started Fri Jan 4 17:23:52 2008
LDAP Library Information -
Highest supported protocol version: 3
LDAP API revision: 2005
API vendor name: Sun Microsystems Inc.
Vendor-specific version: 5.08
LDAP API Extensions:
SERVER_SIDE_SORT (revision 1)
VIRTUAL_LIST_VIEW (revision 1)
PERSISTENT_SEARCH (revision 1)
PROXY_AUTHORIZATION (revision 1)
X_LDERRNO (revision 1)
X_MEMCACHE (revision 1)
X_IO_FUNCTIONS (revision 1)
X_EXTIO_FUNCTIONS (revision 1)
X_DNS_FUNCTIONS (revision 1)
X_MEMALLOC_FUNCTIONS (revision 1)
X_THREAD_FUNCTIONS (revision 1)
X_EXTHREAD_FUNCTIONS (revision 1)
X_GETLANGVALUES (revision 1)
X_CLIENT_SIDE_SORT (revision 1)
X_URL_FUNCTIONS (revision 1)
X_FILTER_FUNCTIONS (revision 1)
ldap_init( sundc1.consoto.com, 636 )
ldaptool_getcertpath -- /var/ldap/cert8.db
ldaptool_getkeypath -- .
ldaptool_getdonglefilename -- (null)
filter pattern: objectclass=*
returning: ALL
filter is: (objectclass=*)
version: 1
dn: dc=consoto,dc=com
objectClass: top
objectClass: domain
objectClass: domainDNS
distinguishedName: DC=consoto,DC=com
instanceType: 5
whenCreated: 20071220204021.0Z
whenChanged: 20071226231851.0Z
subRefs: DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=consoto,DC=com
subRefs: DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=consoto,DC=com
subRefs: CN=Configuration,DC=consoto,DC=com
uSNCreated: 4098
uSNChanged: 16663
name: consoto
objectGUID:: bM0hWw8HKEOYCFN3yQ==
creationTime: 128426572605937500
forceLogoff: -9223372036854775808
lockoutDuration: -18000000000
lockOutObservationWindow: -18000000000
lockoutThreshold: 0
maxPwdAge: -37108517437440
minPwdAge: -864000000000
minPwdLength: 7
modifiedCountAtLastProm: 0
nextRid: 1003
pwdProperties: 1
pwdHistoryLength: 24
objectSid:: AQQAAAAAAAUAAYA4LaLGUspxVHsMP
serverState: 1
uASCompat: 1
modifiedCount: 129
auditingPolicy:: AAE=
nTMixedDomain: 0
rIDManagerReference: CN=RID Manager$,CN=System,DC=consoto,DC=com
fSMORoleOwner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SUNDC1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Nam e,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=consoto,DC=com
systemFlags: -1946157056
wellKnownObjects: B:32:6227F0AF1FC2410D8E3BB10615BB5B0F:CN=NTDS Quotas,DC=sunl
ab,DC=com
wellKnownObjects: B:32:F4BE92A4C777485E878E9421D53087DB:CN=Microsoft,CN=Progra
m Data,DC=consoto,DC=com
wellKnownObjects: B:32:09460C08AE1E4A4EA0F64AEE7DAA1E5A:CN=Program Data,DC=sun
lab,DC=com
wellKnownObjects: B:32:22B70C67D56E4EFB91E9300FCA3DC1AA:CN=ForeignSecurityPrin
cipals,DC=consoto,DC=com
wellKnownObjects: B:32:18E2EA80684F11D2B9AA00C04F79F805:CN=Deleted Objects,DC=
consoto,DC=com
wellKnownObjects: B:32:2FBAC1870ADE11D297C400C04FD8D5CD:CN=Infrastructure,DC=s
unlab,DC=com
wellKnownObjects: B:32:AB8153B7768811D1ADED00C04FD8D5CD:CN=LostAndFound,DC=sun
lab,DC=com
wellKnownObjects: B:32:AB1D30F3768811D1ADED00C04FD8D5CD:CN=System,DC=consoto,DC
=com
wellKnownObjects: B:32:A361B2FFFFD211D1AA4B00C04FD7D83A:OU=Domain Controllers,
DC=consoto,DC=com
wellKnownObjects: B:32:AA312825768811D1ADED00C04FD8D5CD:CN=Computers,DC=consoto
,DC=com
wellKnownObjects: B:32:A9D1CA15768811D1ADED00C04FD8D5CD:CN=Users,DC=consoto,DC=
com
objectCategory: CN=Domain-DNS,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=consoto,DC=com
isCriticalSystemObject: TRUE
gPLink: [LDAP://CN={31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9},CN=Policies,CN=Syste
m,DC=consoto,DC=com;0]
masteredBy: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SUNDC1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,C
N=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=consoto,DC=com
ms-DS-MachineAccountQuota: 10
msDS-Behavior-Version: 2
msDS-PerUserTrustQuota: 1
msDS-AllUsersTrustQuota: 1000
msDS-PerUserTrustTombstonesQuota: 10
msDs-masteredBy: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SUNDC1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-N
ame,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=consoto,DC=com
dc: consoto
1 matches
I am thinking about pam.conf file or ldapclient's configuration file, any suggestion?

I have now sat down and looked at your suggestion and I am pretty certain we can't implement it ... :( I was hoping it was just going to be configuration files that were copied (maybe a naive hope, but there you go!) This system is going to be deployed as a live service for a government agency so I do not think we can, in all good conscience, have binaries from two different OS releases residing on the same server as it will make the system nigh-on non-patchable.
Let's hope Sun have somethig constructive to say about our issue which, I am slowly beginning to think, is related to the password.
If I su to the test AD user we have whilst logged in as a root user (which does not, of course, prompt for a password) it all works nicely - home directory, shell, the id command gives all that is expected of uid and gid. Now, should I be in a as a non-root user and try the same I get prompted for a password and it all fails - despite me providing what should be the correct password.
If I do a getent for the user the returned data has a blank for the password field (as opposed to the usual x).
I think that somewhere, somehow, in the transmission of data that the password is getting a level of encryption that the AD is not setup to unravel. The packets are all encrypted through ldap (we are using tls simple) but what of the password within the packet? Does anything encrypt that first, and if so, does AD know how to decrypt it?

Solaris 8 solaris 7 system file includes

Hello,
I would like to get the header files from /usr/include/sys/*.h of a solaris 7 or previous OS, and copied them on a solaris 8. (on ultra sparc).
Where can I find those headers?
What are the risks to do this?
Thank all in advance.

thanks,
i need to ask some questions:
1- In system copy make differente if its CRM 3.0 or 4.0 or NW2004s or something?
like in master dvd 6.40 i dont find anything related of CRM3.0, just CRM 4.0.
2- what about database password? how can I reset it?
3- this documents its in Unix, the parameter are same for windows?
thank you very much for your help
Regards

Accurate answer for Solaris 9 - Solaris 10 features

Hi Guys,
We are about to make decision migrating from solaris 9 to solaris 10 but I could not find an accurate answer what differences exist between these versions. I know, there are features mentioned in solaris 10 web page but it is not enough. In an conversation with Chris Ratcliffe, he mentioned there are new 600 features added to Solaris 10. So what are they? I can't understand Why there isn't an informative whitepaper or that kind of article for differences between Solaris 9 - 10 from Sun.
If you can please point out something different then Solaris 10 New Features page, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks.

Very good question. I will try to answer.
1. Performance : Any application which run on Solaris 9 if you installed on Solaris 10 , you will get 30 % performace gain.
2. You also get following benefit.
a. Zfs -- this file system eliminates need of volume manager and easy to use it.
b. Zone: You can create virtual server inside your server. You reboot the that server. Some limitation exists but nice feature.
c. Dtrace : You can find point of problem for your application the help of dtrace. Some expertise is needed to use this.
d. Firewall : Firewall included with this OS.
e. SMF : This feasure keeps centralised information about all services. ( Complicated for new user. ) This are few one.
3. Some new system bundeled with Solaris 10 and they do not support Solaris 9. ( T1000 and T2000 )
I am using solaris 10 since last 1 year and are happy about it. But upgradation need to planned carefully. Go for only ( and only ) June 2006 release.
Best Luck.
Mahendra Rajgude

LinuxCAD is available for Solaris SPARC & Solaris X86

W W W . L i n u x C A D . C O M
General purpose drafting program for every computer user and
the Best application program for Linux. Period.
Getting familiar with Linux and LinuxCAD is a wise investment for every computer user.
LinuxCAD is today's leading computer aided design and drafting program for The Linux Operating System.
LinuxCAD has grown in sales and functionality since its original introduction in 1998.
LinuxCAD now represents a complete computer aided design program for Linux ... it is a complete replacement for AutoCAD. For any practical purpose, it implements all major features of AutoCAD in such a way that experienced AutoCAD users do not need additional training to start working with LinuxCAD.
Linux users who are new to CAD will find our Users Manual an easy way to learn the CAD trade. There is so much similarity between LinuxCAD and AutoCAD, that while learning LinuxCAD, you will simultaneously learn AutoCAD.
With remarkable ease you will find yourself creating all kinds of technical illustrations, diagrams, sketches and industrial quality drawings.
Suggested Uses: flowcharting,land surveying,mechanical drawing , architectural drafting, entity relationship diagramming ,software engineering diagramming.
This is a professional quality graphics modelling package for Linux !!!
A must have for every Linux user !!!
Implements all core features of AutoCAD in a very compatible way !!!
No learning curve for AutoCAD users !!!
Download LinuxCAD for $99.00 only
click to order !
www.linuxcad.com

You can Download and configure Apache 1.3.19 w/ ASP and JSP (via jserv and Jakarta) support. You can also enable PHP 4 which iis slightly faster than ASP. You will though have to configure Apache-ASP 2.0 instead of downloading the Linux rpm. The Configuration I have works in that fashion except with the inclusion of Frontpage support for Virtual Domains on our Servers.
Hope that wil help you
Bil Hughes

Install EPM 11.1.1.3 on solaris express 11

Hi all,
I tried to install Essbase v11 on solaris express 11 (in virtualbox) and it stopped during first step...
Package :
I copied *.zip with root user
I unzip all files with root user
I changed owner to oracle user (chown -R oracle *...)
System :
I created /home/oracle/.hyperion.solaris with "HYPERION_HOME" folder
I check javac -version : javac 1.6.0_21
$PATH : /usr/gnu/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
I executed in current forlder : ./installTool.sh -console
Result :
oracle@solaris:/temp_EPM$ ./installTool.sh -console
./installTool.sh[33]: ./jre/solaris/1.6.0/bin/java: ./jre/solaris/1.6.0/bin/java: cannot execute [Invalid argument]
Could some explain me how to install EPM v11 on solaris platform ?
Thanks

A little bit more informations :
Packages are :
Essbase Server =
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-foundation/downloads/hyperion-essbase-111130-082673.html (file1)
System Installer & System Foundation =
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-foundation/downloads/hyperion-foundation-111130-084938.html (file1 & file1 to 4)
Solaris : Oracle Solaris 11 express 2010.11
emulated from windows 7 (64bits)
VirtualBox : 4.1.4
isainfo -v
64-bit amd64 applications
ssse3 sse3 sse2 sse fxsr mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8 tsc fpu
32-bit i386 applications
ssse3 ahf sse3 sse2 sse fxsr mmx cmov sep cx8 tsc fpu

Upgrading opensolaris 134 to solaris express 11

Hello all,
I've followed the instructions here http://blogs.sun.com/observatory/entry/upgrading_from_opensolaris_2009_06 to upgrade open solaris 134 to solaris express 11.
I've managed to upgrade to b134. However changing the preferred publisher to oracle gives an error
ajazam@san:~$ pfexec pkg set-publisher -P -g http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release solaris
pkg set-publisher: The origin URIs for 'solaris' do not appear to point to a valid pkg server.
Please check the server's address and client's network configuration.
Additional details:
Unable to contact valid package server: http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release/
Encountered the following error(s):
Transport errors encountered when trying to contact depot server.
Reported the following errors:
Framework error: code: 7 reason: Failed to connect to 192.9.164.66: Network is down
URL: 'http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release'. (happened 4 times)
ajazam@san:~$
I've been trying to update for two days and still the same error.
Incidently I'm based in the UK. Is the upgrade US specific? Am I doing anything wrong? Note I can access http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release via a browser.

My netwokring is set to manual
Here is the traceroute trace
ajazam@san:~$ traceroute pkg.oracle.com
traceroute: Warning: Multiple interfaces found; using 192.168.9.135 @ bge0
traceroute to pkg.oracle.com (192.9.164.66), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 192.168.9.254 (192.168.9.254) 2.715 ms 1.197 ms 4.633 ms
2 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 6.359 ms 2.205 ms 2.096 ms
3 * * *
4 10.1.2.173 (10.1.2.173) 25.311 ms 24.712 ms 28.063 ms
5 xe-9-1-0.edge3.London1.Level3.net (212.113.15.65) 24.325 ms 20.038 ms 24. 203 ms
6 ae-34-52.ebr2.London1.Level3.net (4.69.139.97) 21.530 ms 21.457 ms 24.605 ms
7 ae-41-41.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.137.66) 98.213 ms ae-44-44.ebr1.New York1.Level3.net (4.69.137.78) 90.688 ms ae-43-43.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.6 9.137.74) 93.461 ms
8 ae-81-81.csw3.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.74) 104.229 ms ae-71-71.csw2.Ne wYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.70) 103.036 ms 93.066 ms
9 ae-82-82.ebr2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.148.41) 93.551 ms 97.331 ms ae-62- 62.ebr2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.148.33) 99.552 ms
10 ae-2-2.ebr4.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.135.185) 158.964 ms 161.770 ms 161. 996 ms
11 ae-64-64.csw1.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.242) 172.888 ms 171.059 ms 16 6.106 ms
12 ae-11-69.car1.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.68.18.3) 162.633 ms 162.681 ms 172.3 62 ms
13 SUN-MICROSY.car1.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.53.16.50) 163.436 ms 160.952 ms 1 58.788 ms
14 192.18.44.18 (192.18.44.18) 167.696 ms 168.433 ms 163.434 ms
15 * * *
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
22 * * *
23 * * *
24 * * *
25 * * *
26 * * *
27 * * *
28 * * *
29 * * *
30 * * *
ajazam@san:~$
here is the netstat -r
ajazam@san:~$ netstat -r
Routing Table: IPv4
Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
default 192.168.9.254 UG 4 426
san.local san.local UH 2 40 lo0
192.168.9.0 192.168.9.135 U 4 163 bge0
192.168.10.0 192.168.10.135 U 2 0 e1000g1
192.168.11.0 192.168.11.135 U 2 0 e1000g2
192.168.12.0 192.168.12.135 U 2 0 e1000g3
192.168.13.0 192.168.13.135 U 2 0 e1000g0
192.168.56.0 192.168.56.1 U 2 0 vboxnet0
192.168.100.0 192.168.100.100 U 2 0 vnic1
Routing Table: IPv6
Destination/Mask Gateway Flags Ref Use If
san san UH 2 4 lo0
Le me know if you want anything else

Solaris Express , Developer Edition as a linux alternative

Hi Folks,
there is no doubt that Solaris began shining lately . I'm thinking to install it on my laptop as an alternative to linux to develop web applications .
some issues are bothering my a lot, I'll name them to you ,so we can decide together :
1. ruby official website does not provide a solaris package, how to develop Rails websites then ?
2. Mono has no official package for x86 machines running solaris , only Solaris 8 (Sparc) is supported .
I'm very interested in Solaris, especially Developer edition , eager to start to installing it !
what do you think ?

I think I hope it installs, especially on a laptop system. It failes to install on every desktop system here, I wouldn't dare put it in my laptop and see what it says. Laptops usually have a more esoteric hardware configuration than desktop systems.
For you I really don't see the benefit of switching operating systems just to develop web applications. If you were a Java developer developing J2EE web applications then Solaris and it's integrated Java Enterprise system and first-rate developer tools would be a great change, but for Ruby on Rails and Mono - I don't see the point.
For Ruby there may be a package available, check the OpenSolaris website and see if it has been ported over (it most probably has been, but I haven't checked yet).
For Mono... I don't see the point in developing .NET web applications for Linux/Solaris, so I won't go there. Mono is a joke compared to Microsoft's .NET platform.

Solaris 10 vs Solaris Express

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for