Solaris 10 x64 instalation problems

Hi,
I install solaris on Tyan S2882 ( dual opteron )
mainboard
with Adaptec 39320A-R SCSI card and two SCSI HDD:
40 GB Seagate and
1,25 TB EonStor A12U-G1410 RAID matrix.
When I install system from DVD, solaris boot only in
32 bit
mode and dont properly detect big disk (disk is too
large in 32 bit mode).
I can't force solaris to boot in 64 bit mode.That is correct since the miniroot is a 32 bit kernel. There are couple of
options. First, since you mention that its a RAID device, are there tools to partition that RAID disk into smaller chunks ? Typically this is feasible and then that RAID device will appear as 2 disks to the kernel. If you have another disk to install to and you want the entire device to be visible under Solaris, format is is the right way to do it. You need add an GPT (EFI label). If format is core dumping then please file a bug or check if you need a patch to address it.
>
When I install solaris in 32 bit mode and later
modify "boot-file"
to "kernel/amd64/unix". kernel start in 64 bit mode.
Unfortunatly wnen I run "format" to add big disk
manualy
format finish with core dump file.
How force solaris to start installation from DVD in
64 bit mode.
How add disk greater than 1 TB to system.
Regards,
-Piotr Galecki

Similar Messages

Solaris 8 Install Problem - Partition(s)

First, I am a relative "newbie" when it comes to SUN Solaris and System Adminstration, though I know enough UNIX to be dangerous (read "get me into trouble" - hahaha).
I tried to do an "upgrade" to the O/S (2.7) on my Ultra 5, but when doing an "initial install", the system will only allow me to set the partitions/slices manually at the cylinder level. Any attempts to do so have failed, as I keep getting an "overlapping cylinder" error message, regardless of how I try to setup root, /usr, etc. The Solaris 8 O/S setup swap as follows:
Starting - 3275 Size - 1110
FYI, I was trying to do the install using the Solaris 8 CDROM, Solaris build date 2/02.
Overall, I appear to be having a lot of issues with the Seagate Medalist ST34321A (4.1 Gbyte) drive that came with my Sun Ultra 5. The drive appears to work correctly, but an attempts to "wipe out" the drive (reformat) have not met with success.
Any suggestions anyone can provide regarding the install problem would be appreciated.

If you are trying to Upgrade to Sol 8 it is strongly suggested that you do not use the Installation CD. Use CD 1 of 2 with a boot cdrom. You will have to answer the sysid questions and then should get prompted for Initial Install or Upgrade. If you do not get the Upgrade prompt then there is a problem with your original Sol 7 system. Things like nfs mounts in vfstab, links to /var/sadm/patch, pkg or install/contents.
An Upgrade should not be asking you to lay out filesystems. It should use your existing ones.

Solaris 10 install problem (requested image to big to fit into memory)

I have just downloaded the iso images and burned to disk. When I go to install I get the message (Requested image to big to fit into memory Error 28) I have 1.5GB so I don't understand the problem. Thanks in advance
It took a long time for me to figure out, but the answer is disable in BIOS memory hole at 15M to 16M. This solved the install problem with Open Solaris and quite a few more such as not being able to install Linux Zenwalk 5.0 or openSUSE 10.3. Their are others also problems I have had with Linux or UNIX that this took care of. JGZ
Edited by: jgz on Mar 8, 2008 9:13 PM

Hi,
I had been able to solve the Error 28 issue that in my case was really related to a corrupted boot image:
1. I went in the path /a/platform/i86pc
2. rm boot_archive.
3. sync
4. reboot
At this point the OS will notice the absence of the boot_image and it will regenerate it.
At the time of this operation the CD with solaris 10 was inserted in the CDROM.
When the system restarted it was able to load the OS properly.
Please use these information at your own risk. I do not accept any liablity.
Cheers

Solaris x64 install (wan boot / flash archive)

Hi,
I need to install a Solaris x64 on a x2200m2, it's the first Sun machine on that network, no boot server or jumpstart server around.
I am thinking to use wan boot on x64, but it seems that wan boot only support sparc platform, is that true?
the other way i want to do is to make a bootable dvdrom with flash archive in it. anyone have experience on that?
dk

There is actually a Sun blueprint for creating a boot DVD with flash archive integrated.
I don't have it handy; but it covers the basics.
Best,

Solaris 10 Install problem with SATA drives

Hi, I'm trying to install solaris 10 on a x86 system with 2 SATA drives running in a on board SATA controler (not RAID).
During install the setup fails to detect the disks, to install Windows XP I have to provide disk drivers during the setup procedure by pressing F6 and providing the drivers, alas I cannot seem to find either a way to provide SATA controler drivers to solaris, nor a suitable driver for solaris .
Any help would be extremely apreciated.

I had the same SATA problem on builds 69 and 72 of Solaris10, but the Release version recognises and installs readily on SATA drives on three mainboards that I use. They are Tyan s2875 with dual opteron cpus, Asus k8N-E with a 754 pin athlon64 cpu, and Gigabyte GA-K8NS-939 with a939 pin athlon64.
My Mandrake Linux10 says it sees the SATA drives, but never installed on them.
FreeBSD 5.3 Release for AMD64 sees the SATA and installs with no problems.
Hope this gives you some encouragement to persist

Solaris 9 Install Problems

I am experiencing some problems on the latest release of Solaris 9 (1st non-beta, 6/03/02 downloaded). The installation seems to go smoothly, until it's finished and reboots the system. The system gets to the point:
Booting the 32 Bit OS (64 Bit on the Sun Blade 100)
and then says cannot access /etc/system and then the system goes into a panic state:
panic[cpu0]thread=1406000: read_binding_file: /etc/name_to_major file not found
01405990 genunix:read_binding++file+40 (1436ab8, 1453ecc, 7dc7c000, ffffffff
The system goes on with messages like this for a page or so and then immediately reboots. I have now tried this on two different systems (Sun Ultra 1, Sun Blade 100) Both of which appear to meet all system requirements. I have searched for this problem on google and some message boards and seen nothing like it.
My first instinct was to check the "boot-device" and it was pointing to the right disk in both cases. I can not think of anything else that would cause this.
Any help would be appreciated.
Daryl.

It sounds like somehow the installed root file system
is corrupted. Next time you install, do not select the
automatic reboot. After the install is finished, cd to /a
(where the newly installed boot drive is located
during installation) and verify that the file system
looks ok. Check /etc/system, /etc/path_to_inst, ...
-- richard

Solaris 9 install problem

I'm having a problem installing Solaris 9 on my ultrasparc IIi 440MHz system. I'm installing from CDs burned from the free iso download from Sun. Everything seems to be going fine until disc Software 2 of 2 where the web start install hangs. I can't figure out how to get to the command line, check for errors, or what to do next. Here is what is displayed last:
Starting Web Start Launcher in Command Line Mode
Launching installer. Please Wait...
Installing Additional Software
|-1%- ... -100%|
Nov 11 06:50:59 dev sendmail[208] My unqualified host name (dev) unknown; sleey
Nov 11 06:50:59 dev sendmail[207] My unqualified host name (dev) unknown; sleey
Nov 11 06:52:39 dev sendmail[207] unable to qualify my own domain name (dev) -e
Nov 11 06:52:39 dev sendmail[208] unable to qualify my own domain name (dev) -eI know I have the wrong domain name because I decided on a different one halfway through the install and was planning to change it after it was done. Does the reverse DNS need to be functioning in order to continue? Also, the box has a link light but I am unable to ping it. Is that normall at this stage of the install?
Didn't run itno this problem with Solaris 8 on an identical box. Please help.

I was under the impression that the install would concatenate the hostname and domain entries for the full host name.This should be the case if your machine would have found a valid DNS configuration.
Am I supposed to add the trailing dot to the domain? Some installation methods you can add dot and some others you can't.
Best is to leave the dot and fix DNS.
Ping (w/ IP Address or Hostname ?)Ping IP should work, Ping Hostname or FQHN would not work if your machine does not know how to present itself.
.. Eric

Free Solaris 9 Instalation Problems

Dears Sirs,
(if this is not the forum i should post this, someone could please redirect me?)
I have the following HD configuration (I'm writing dev's in Linux style because I am completly new to Solaris)
/dev/hdc <- six partitions, three are primary, one is extended and the other two are 'inside' this extended one...
/dev/hdd <- two partitions, the first is having some bad.block problems, so i'd better not touch it
I want to install Solaris on the second partition of /dev/hdd, which is my second IDE slave disk. But the instalation program looks for Solaris partitions only in /dev/rdsk/c1d0p0 (i guess this is the name)... I would rather not install it there, but in /dev/rdsk/c1d1p0 instead. But when it detects I have no Solaris partitions on hdc, the only option I have is to quit, fix the problem and latter come back to the instalation program... anyone got any clue?
Thanks in advance...
Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont

A weird decision I made when I chose to have my HD's in the second IDE... so weird I can't remember now (I must have been asleep at that moment). Well, in fact I will change it, anyways.
I am quite versed on Linux today (in fact I only have winxp because my brother needs it - if I lived alone I would have Gentoo Linux only) and (NOTE: I have managed to access my other HD through Solaris9 install xterm and create a 4.4GB partition there, which I guess will be enough)... and when switched back to Linux today I found that Solaris9's fdisk made some changes which Linux's fdisk "didn't like", let's put it like that. I guess the logical/physical start/end of the referred partion were different. BTW, hdc is the master HD in the second IDE and hdd is the slave HD on the second IDE. I wanted to install Solaris on hdd, but I can only guess it is impossible... I have an alternative IDE scheme in mind... which is the following:
hda (master 1st ide): HD <- with Linux and WinXP
hdb (slave 1st ide): CDROM <- the one I use less
hdc (master 2nd IDE): HD <- one in which I'd install Solaris9
hdd (slave 2nd IDE): CD-WRITER <- which I use the most
With this scheme I guess I would optimize the use of the IDE's and I woudn't have a master waiting for a slave or a slave waiting for a master most of the time... well, it's guess anyways...
Anyway, isn't there a command like "/sbin/cd0_install --install-into=/dev/rsdk/c1d1p0" this???
Thanks,
Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont

P6N diamond - Vista x64 install problem

Hey.
I’m the happy owner of a MSI P6N Diamond, but I have some problems when I try to install Vista.
My system as it is now:
CPU: E6600
GFX: 7900GT
RAM: 2x1gb Cell Shock PC6400
Running XP SP2 without problems on 2x36gb raptors in RAID0
Yesterday I decided to try Vista x64, because I have 2gb extra ram that I want to use. So I took one of my old IBM PATA 120gb HDDs, and tried to install vista x64, but then I ran into a problem. When I get to the point where it says "Completing Installation" and "Your Computer will restart several times during installation" It restarts but then nothing happens. The screen just went black (and the monitor is switching off), and I can hear the computer is still running (and there is still light in mouse and keyboard). If I try to restart, the the vista loading bar appears and then the same thing happens. Black screen and then nothing.
What to do?
I have tried disconnecting all my other drives and I have tried with only one memory block (1gb)
Hope somebody can help me
/Christian

Inside,
I had similar issues when I first installed Vista and I don't think it installed correctly as it is...
One thing I noticed was that the Memory in particular is undervolted with this board if the bios is set to auto. Make sure you manually set the voltage to your RAM manufacturers voltage. Do the same thing with the timings and speed...
I had everything set to auto at first and I couldn't even get Vista to unpack 100% until I manually set things...
I need to reinstall windows I think because my installation is still messed up as I didn't change the timings until I started getting BSOD on first boot... Try it let us know if it works.

LMS 3.2 Solaris 10 install problem

hi
I have been trying for two days now to get LMS 3.2 properly installed on Solaris 10 10/08.
Installed on ZFS filesystem with patch 127127-11 applied.
The "symptoms" are as follow:
When I point my browser to http://10.xxx.xxx.xxx:1741
I get redirected to: https://10.xxx.xxx.xxx/CSCOnm/servlet/login/login.jsp
RESULT Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage
I have tried to install different parts of LMS suite but nothing seems to work.
Any help is very welcome !
BR
Lasse

#1
I'm working on at two server setup. ciscoworks01 and ciscoworks02.
If ciscoworks02 appear in the logs, I fear that I by mistake have sent the wrong files(unless the two servers have communicated autonomously). I have attached the correct stdout.log now.......
#2
/etc/hosts and hostname output is equal. ciscoworks01
#3
The redirect is on the same ip address
#4
File is attached
#5
/opt/CSCOpx/bin/perl ConfigSSL.pl -disable
SSL is already disabled
#6
My SSLutils is in /opt/CSCOpx/MDC/Apache/ bin
/opt/CSCOpx/bin/perl SSLUtil.pl
*** CiscoWorks SSL Utility ***
Note: Any Certificate given as input to this script should be in Base64-Encoded X.509Certificate format
You have the following options
1. Display CiscoWorks Server Certificate Information
2. Display the input Certificate Information
3. Display Root CA Certificates trusted by CiscoWorks Server
4. Verify the input Certificate/ Certificate Chain
5. Upload Single Server Certificate to CiscoWorks Server
6. Upload a Certificate Chain to CiscoWorks Server
7. Modify Common Services Certificate
8. Quit
Enter your choice [1-8]:7
Common Services Certificate details:
subject= /CN=*DOMAINNAME*/emailAddress=[email protected]
issuer= /CN=*DOMAINNAME*/emailAddress=[email protected]
Host Name in Common Services Certificate is given below
Do you want to change the Host Name in the Certificate [y/n]?
Y:
changed the certificate to the same.
I will check the service first thing tommorow as I can only ssh to the server right now.
Thanks

Solaris 8 install problems on Ultra 10

I have an Ultra 10 and I am trying to install Solaris 8 on it. I have actuall real Solaris 8 CDs. I put it in the cdrom in, hit stop-a and type 'boot cdrom'. The system resets.
When it boots it I get:
Can't open /pci...etc
Can't read disk label
Can't open disk label package
Can't open boot device
Any ideas?

Solved: Replace the cdrom drive and keep trying until one boots. It took me four different cdroms.

Solaris 10 Install problem on headless E250

I have tried a number of times to get the latest download to install on my headless E250 using the text installer. Most times it installs the 1st cd then reboots only to report that "the file just loaded does not appear to be executable". This is taking the default options, installing the full version, using autolayout on 2x9GB drives.
I've upgraded openboot to 3.30 I've tried installing it on different 18GB drives - I either get the same message, or the boot fails with a read-only filesystem error.
Anyone had similar problems that can point me in the right direction...
JJ

Anytime i've seen that kind of error is when there is a problem with some settings in the PROM on the system.
If you do your STOP+A to get to the OK prompt.
Next to a 'printenv' a look to see what the values are for 'boot-device' and 'diag-device'. The values normally look something like 'disk' or 'disk net'. If you install the root partition on slice 0 then the value 'disk' is fine, if you install the root partition on slice 1 the the value 'disk:b' should be there.
It might be worth trying a 'set-defaults' which will reset the PROM back to it's default values, and try the install again.
Hope this is of some use
Mick.

Solaris 10 install problem "No Solaris Web Start Ready products were found"

I am trying to install Solaris10 U5 in SunFire 240 .
I booted the box through CD-ROM and chosen NFS to install the OS.
when it asks to specify the NFS Server details, after entering my NFS Server/share details, i am getting a warning message, and installation won't go.
"No Solaris Web Start Ready products were found"
Why i am getting this error ?
What is the solution ?

Check the HCL to see if your SCSI controller is supported
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl
If not, LSI may have a driver at
http://www.lsilogic.com/downloads/selectDownload.do

Oracle 8i EE Solaris 7 install problem

Install 8i(8.1.7) with minimal(or typical) option. Everything went fine until it stalled at step "initializing database" during creating a startup db, with error message "ORA-03114, not connected to Oracle". I ignored it, and then it comes with another error "ORA-27101: shared memory realm does not exist". Anyway, database creation fails.
I have searched the newgroups and found a few similar messages but no formal answers
were found. By the way, I applied all OS patches and made sure pre-install setup. Strangely, I did the same install on the machine with Oracle 8.1.5 without problem.
Any idea ? Thanks
null

seems which the PROCESSES parameter of init.ora changed in 815 -> 817 from 50 to 150
so the kernel parameters in /etc/system cannot be suficient large to startup the database, I has the same problem and increasing the parameters which affect the PROCESSES in init.ora, solved it
null

Install Oracle 8.1.7 in Solaris, disk space problems.

Hi!
I'm installing Oracle 8.1.7 in Solaris (typical instalation, Entrepise Edition).In addition, I have created two directories (/u01 and /u02).I would like to store Oracle Software in /u01 and I would like store my database in /u02.During instalation have been appeared a problem, I only have in / 650 Mbytes availables and Oracle requests 750 Mbytes. How Could I have more space in /?
With best wishes.
Jordi.

You may try to add the environment variable
ORACLE_TERM=vt100 which is not include in your envornment setting.

Solaris 10 x64 instalation problems

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for