Solaris 10 x86 64 bit Software

Hello,
I'm looking for Solaris 10 x86 64 bit OS. I downloaded one from OTN and appearently it is 32 bit. Can anybody let me know where to download 64 bit version?
Thanks a lot.

gbyte2001 wrote:
I'm looking for Solaris 10 x86 64 bit OS. I downloaded one from OTN and appearently it is 32 bit. Can anybody let me know where to download 64 bit version?
From
[URL: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris/downloads/index.html]
Oracle Solaris 10 (x86) (2,009,606,091 bytes) (md5sum: cb55f4b7af194f6378aa5f304f3ea8fc)
Starting with the Solaris 10 3/05 release, packaging has been simplified with the delivery of most 32-bit components and 64-bit components in a single package. The combined packages retain the names of the original 32-bit packages, and the 64-bit packages are no longer delivered.
The removal of the 64-bit packages simplifies installation and increases performance:
Reduces the number of packages, which simplifies Custom JumpStart scripts that contain lists of packages
Simplifies the packaging system with only one package that groups software functions
Reduces installation time because fewer packages are installed
The 64-bit packages are renamed with the following conventions:
If a 64-bit package has a 32-bit counterpart, the 64-bit package is named with the 32-bit package name. For example, a 64-bit library such as /usr/lib/sparcv9/libc.so.1 previously would have been delivered in SUNWcslx, but now is delivered in SUNWcsl. The 64-bit SUNWcslx package is no longer delivered.
If a package does not have a 32-bit counterpart, the “x” suffix is removed from the name. For example, SUNW1394x becomes SUNW1394.
This change means that you might need to modify your custom JumpStart script or other package installation scripts to remove references to the 64-bit packages.
Please let me know if this helps.
</SQ>
Edited by: Sergio Quiroz on Jun 22, 2011 9:34 AM

Similar Messages

Solaris 10 x86 64-bit wireless connection problem

I installed Solaris 10 x86 32-bit on my laptop together with Fedora 10 (Linux) and Windows XP.
When I boot up Fedora 10 and WinXP, these two OS are able to find the wireless driver automatically, but Solaris 10 failed.
When I do prtconf -pv, I saw my wireless card is listed in the output.
So I update the /boot/solaris/devicedb/master and /etc/driver_aliases with my wireless card id - pci168c,001a
Then do sys-unconfig and reboot
But after reboot, Solaris still only tries to configure the ethernet card (NIC) rather than checking out the wireless connection.
I think this might be a design flaw for Solaris 10. If it runs on x86, most users would have wireless connection, not just land line connection.
Does anyone here have a solution for this problem?
Thanks a lot!

I assume that when solaris 10 boots up, it only checks the land line NIC card, not the wireless card. If there is no lan connection, then so be it.
Is that right?No! :-)
nwam only supports one device but the device is selectable. physical should activate all devices regardless. So if your Wifi isn't working then I would use wificonfig to see what it can see. Check the man page for scan and showstatus options. Then you'll know what it's seeing.
alan

Java upgrade over solaris 10 x86 32 bit for weblogic installation

Hi All I need to install weblogic over solaris 10 x86, for that i need following configuration :-
JDK Sun Java 2 JDK 6.0 Update 05 with the Java HotSpot™ Client and Server
VMs (32-bit) and all later service packs of 6.0
How can i update this java over solris or is it actually required.Can someone please help??
Sharad

I have solaris 10 x86 32 bit installed over my system and i have got this weblogic installer :-
Oracle WebLogic Server 11gR1 (10.3.4) Generic and Coherence V24338-01 1.1G
Would it be gud. or i would need something else. Actually thing is I am having windows machines over which i have installed solaris 10 x86 running over VM ware, i also upgraded java to 7 update. Now would it go fine with the mentioned file or I am going wrong somewhere,
Please suggest as i am running out of resources here.
Thanks in advance.

SFWgkrel under Solaris 10 x86/64

Hello hello...
'desperately looking for the SFWgkrel package for an x86/64 bits Solaris 10 platform.
'Found it easily for the SPARC architecture.
Any hints?
Many thanks in advance...

gbyte2001 wrote:
I'm looking for Solaris 10 x86 64 bit OS. I downloaded one from OTN and appearently it is 32 bit. Can anybody let me know where to download 64 bit version?
From
[URL: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris/downloads/index.html]
Oracle Solaris 10 (x86) (2,009,606,091 bytes) (md5sum: cb55f4b7af194f6378aa5f304f3ea8fc)
Starting with the Solaris 10 3/05 release, packaging has been simplified with the delivery of most 32-bit components and 64-bit components in a single package. The combined packages retain the names of the original 32-bit packages, and the 64-bit packages are no longer delivered.
The removal of the 64-bit packages simplifies installation and increases performance:
Reduces the number of packages, which simplifies Custom JumpStart scripts that contain lists of packages
Simplifies the packaging system with only one package that groups software functions
Reduces installation time because fewer packages are installed
The 64-bit packages are renamed with the following conventions:
If a 64-bit package has a 32-bit counterpart, the 64-bit package is named with the 32-bit package name. For example, a 64-bit library such as /usr/lib/sparcv9/libc.so.1 previously would have been delivered in SUNWcslx, but now is delivered in SUNWcsl. The 64-bit SUNWcslx package is no longer delivered.
If a package does not have a 32-bit counterpart, the “x” suffix is removed from the name. For example, SUNW1394x becomes SUNW1394.
This change means that you might need to modify your custom JumpStart script or other package installation scripts to remove references to the 64-bit packages.
Please let me know if this helps.
</SQ>
Edited by: Sergio Quiroz on Jun 22, 2011 9:34 AM

Solaris 10 x86-64 NO EXISTE??

Buenas tarde para todos!! Me encuentro en un dilema!, q dentro de mi vitualizacion nesecito istalar Solaris 10 x86 de 64Bit, y solo logro encontrar tanto en la pagina de oracle como en toda la red , solaris de 32 bits, por favor nesecito esto URGENTE!!!, Gracias
Ing. Mauricio Lopez
ISCOLOMBIA

gbyte2001 wrote:
I'm looking for Solaris 10 x86 64 bit OS. I downloaded one from OTN and appearently it is 32 bit. Can anybody let me know where to download 64 bit version?
From
[URL: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris/downloads/index.html]
Oracle Solaris 10 (x86) (2,009,606,091 bytes) (md5sum: cb55f4b7af194f6378aa5f304f3ea8fc)
Starting with the Solaris 10 3/05 release, packaging has been simplified with the delivery of most 32-bit components and 64-bit components in a single package. The combined packages retain the names of the original 32-bit packages, and the 64-bit packages are no longer delivered.
The removal of the 64-bit packages simplifies installation and increases performance:
Reduces the number of packages, which simplifies Custom JumpStart scripts that contain lists of packages
Simplifies the packaging system with only one package that groups software functions
Reduces installation time because fewer packages are installed
The 64-bit packages are renamed with the following conventions:
If a 64-bit package has a 32-bit counterpart, the 64-bit package is named with the 32-bit package name. For example, a 64-bit library such as /usr/lib/sparcv9/libc.so.1 previously would have been delivered in SUNWcslx, but now is delivered in SUNWcsl. The 64-bit SUNWcslx package is no longer delivered.
If a package does not have a 32-bit counterpart, the “x” suffix is removed from the name. For example, SUNW1394x becomes SUNW1394.
This change means that you might need to modify your custom JumpStart script or other package installation scripts to remove references to the 64-bit packages.
Please let me know if this helps.
</SQ>
Edited by: Sergio Quiroz on Jun 22, 2011 9:34 AM

Stmsboot on Solaris 10 x86

Does the stmsboot command exist on Solaris 10 x86 Update 3? Do I still need to run 'stmsboot -e' to allow multipathing to a SAN? The man page is out there, but no sign on the executable. I've looked on the CD and didn't see it there either. Since stmsboot is a script I didn't know if it's created during install or something. Thanks for any help!

Depend of your Peopletools version.
I may have wrong, but it seems the last Peopletools certified on Solaris 10 x86 (32-bits) is 8.45, from the 8.46 only the 64-bits is certified.
Nicolas.

Peoplesoft on SOLARIS 10 x86

Can peoplesoft run on solaris 10 x86?

Depend of your Peopletools version.
I may have wrong, but it seems the last Peopletools certified on Solaris 10 x86 (32-bits) is 8.45, from the 8.46 only the 64-bits is certified.
Nicolas.

ODBC to DB2 from Solaris 10 X86 64

I am trying to make a ODBC connection to a DB2 database on a AS400 via a datadirect ODBC driver. This is working.
Now i am trying to use the hsdodbc driver to make a connection from the Oracle 10.2.0.4 64bit database on the Solaris 10 x86 64 bit.
I modified the listener.ora.
lsnrctl reload
LSNRCTL for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on 21-APR-2009 15:24:14
Copyright (c) 1991, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connecting to (DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=srv020.emons.nl)(PORT=1521)))
TNS-01201: Listener cannot find executable /oracle/oracle10/10.2.0/db_1/bin/hsodbc for SID HSAS400
the driver does not exist; only the file /oracle/oracle10/10.2.0/db_1/bin/hsodbcO
Apparantly hsodbc is not supported on this platform. What are the alternatives?
Thanks in advance,
Toon

use DG4ODBC V11.
DG4ODBC is a real gateway and thus can be installed independantly from the Oracle database; even on a separate machine.
Using DG4ODBC will allow you to use an Oracle database 9.2.0.8, 10.1.0.5, 10.2.0.3 (pay attention, these Oracle database requires a compatibility patch) or an Oracle db 10.2.0.4 and 11 (patch already included) to connect to a foreign database using ODBC.
The connection is then initated by the Oracle db which connects to the gateway listener on a second machine. The gateway listener spawns the gateway executable which loads the ODBC driver and connects to the foreign database.

Reg: Oracle 9i Enterprise Edition software for solaris x86 (32-bit)

Hi,
Where can i download the Oracle 9i Enterprise Edition software for solaris x86 (32-bit).
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: ora_man_8873786 on May 14, 2011 12:50 AM

If you have a CSI you can always order the CD at My Oracle Support by submitting a SR.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

Windows 8 installation of VPN Client Software (x86 64-bit version) results in "Icon09DB8A851.exe" on startup task

I've just installed a VPN Client Software for x86 64-bit version of Vista and Windows 7 (vpnclient-winx64-msi-5.0.07.0440-k9.exe) to Windows 8. It's working without problem except that it seems to add an entry "c:\Windows\Installer\{5FDC06BF-3D3D-4367-8FFB-4FAFCB61972D}\Icon09DB8A851.exe" onto startup task. I suspect the installer program (InstallShield) is not working properly. I'd like to know if anyone has same issue or my computer got infected in malware.

Hi I have installed and config to my client a ASA 5515 and everything is fine but. When I config L2TP/IPSEC VPN for the remote work bang I have a problem. When I config L2TP/IPSEC VPN to Windows 7 with native client on Windows everything is fine, but in Windows 8.1 is bad on 1 hour after VPN connection Windows 8.1 tries to renegotiate the connection and something happens and the connection is disconnected.
LOG:
5
Feb 14   2014
14:53:07
713049
Group =   DefaultRAGroup, IP = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, Security negotiation complete   for User () Responder, Inbound SPI = 0x869df107, Outbound SPI = 0xfb02e574
4
Feb 14   2014
16:41:08
113019
Group =   DefaultRAGroup, Username = s.choraliev, IP = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, Session disconnected. Session   Type: L2TPOverIPsecOverNatT, Duration: 1h:48m:01s, Bytes xmt: 29765217, Bytes   rcv: 9633270, Reason: L2TP initiated
5
Feb 14   2014
16:41:09
713119
Group =   DefaultRAGroup, IP = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, PHASE 1 COMPLETED
6
Feb 14   2014
16:41:09
602303
IPSEC: An   outbound remote access SA (SPI= 0x805CA50C) between XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX and XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX (user= DefaultRAGroup) has been   created.
5
Feb 14   2014
16:41:09
713049
Group =   DefaultRAGroup, IP = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, Security negotiation complete   for User () Responder, Inbound SPI = 0x9a7f5ac6, Outbound SPI = 0x805ca50c
5
Feb 14   2014
16:41:09
713120
Group =   DefaultRAGroup, IP = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, PHASE 2 COMPLETED   (msgid=00000001)
And the VPN session is stack.

Install error for Oracle 10g on Solaris x86 64-bit. NETCA won't run

Hi All,
I'm installing Oracle 10.2.0.1 on Solaris x86 64-bit. I run the Oracle installer and all runs well until the NETCA portion of the install. It then errors (error file below). When i attempt to run NETCA outside of the installer i'm getting the same error output. I have verified my OS version and that all dependent packages are installed. I'm not sure what is causing this. Any help would be greatly appriciated.
thanks, dave
ERROR FILE:
An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0xFEEF24E8
Function=strchr+0x8
Library=/lib/libc.so.1
Current Java thread:
     at oracle.net.common.NetGetEnv.getDNSDomain(Native Method)
     at oracle.net.ca.ConfigureProfile.setDefaultProfileParams(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.setupConfigObjects(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.<init>(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ca.NetCA.main(Unknown Source)
Dynamic libraries:
0x8050000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/bin/java
0xfefc0000      /lib/libthread.so.1
0xfefd0000      /lib/libdl.so.1
0xfeed0000      /lib/libc.so.1
0xfea00000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
0xfee80000      /usr/lib/libCrun.so.1
0xfee50000      /lib/libsocket.so.1
0xfedc0000      /lib/libnsl.so.1
0xfeda0000      /lib/libm.so.1
0xfeeb0000      /usr/lib/libsched.so.1
0xfe9a0000      /lib/libm.so.2
0xfed50000      /lib/libscf.so.1
0xfe980000      /lib/libdoor.so.1
0xfe960000      /lib/libuutil.so.1
0xfe940000      /lib/libmd5.so.1
0xfe920000      /lib/libmp.so.2
0xfe8e0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/native_threads/libhpi.so
0xfe890000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libverify.so
0xfe850000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so
0xfe830000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libzip.so
0xf1a00000      /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8.so.3
0xfc780000      /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/methods_en_US.UTF-8.so.3
0xf13c0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libawt.so
0xf0f90000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libmlib_image.so
0xf0f30000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/motif21/libmawt.so
0xf0d50000      /usr/dt/lib/libXm.so.4
0xf0cf0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.4
0xf0cc0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXext.so.0
0xf1890000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXtst.so.1
0xf0c30000      /usr/openwin/lib/libX11.so.4
0xf0be0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libdps.so.5
0xf0a90000      /usr/openwin/lib/libSM.so.6
0xf0a70000      /usr/openwin/lib/libICE.so.6
0xf0a30000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnjni10.so
0xefe00000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libclntsh.so.10.1
0xefc60000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnnz10.so
0xf0a10000      /lib/libkstat.so.1
0xefc40000      /lib/libgen.so.1
0xefc20000      /lib/librt.so.1
0xefbf0000      /lib/libaio.so.1
0xefbd0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libldapjclnt10.so
Heap at VM Abort:
Heap
def new generation total 576K, used 343K [0xf1e00000, 0xf1ea0000, 0xf22e0000)
eden space 512K, 55% used [0xf1e00000, 0xf1e467f8, 0xf1e80000)
from space 64K, 96% used [0xf1e80000, 0xf1e8f798, 0xf1e90000)
to space 64K, 0% used [0xf1e90000, 0xf1e90000, 0xf1ea0000)
tenured generation total 1408K, used 338K [0xf22e0000, 0xf2440000, 0xf5e00000)
the space 1408K, 24% used [0xf22e0000, 0xf2334ab8, 0xf2334c00, 0xf2440000)
compacting perm gen total 4096K, used 3580K [0xf5e00000, 0xf6200000, 0xf9e00000)
the space 4096K, 87% used [0xf5e00000, 0xf617f170, 0xf617f200, 0xf6200000)
Local Time = Tue Aug 29 13:49:22 2006
Elapsed Time = 225
# The exception above was detected in native code outside the VM
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_05-b04 mixed mode)
#

I have the same problem on Linux Debian 3.0.
My /etc/hosts looks like:
127.0.0.1     localhost.localdomain     localhost
#192.168.100.1     bt.lan.home     bt
#192.168.100.5     jacek.lan.home     jacek
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1     ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
ff02::3 ip6-allhostsPlease help.

How to upgrade oracle 32 to 64 bit on sun solaris x86 64 bit OS?

Hi,
I want to upgrade/convert 32 bit Oracle Database 10.2.0.2 to 64 bit database. Existing 32 bit database is RAC and it is running on Sun Solaris X86 64 bit OS.
First, I want to know is it possible?
If yes, then what are the exact steps?

Hi,
Such a migration can be done, just follow the steps in Metalink note 62290.1
It is important to remember that 64-bit database requires more shared pool memory so you should increase your shared pool size.
Liron Amitzi
Senior DBA consultant
[www.dbsnaps.com]
[www.orbiumsoftware.com]
Edited by: Liron Amitzi on Jul 1, 2009 3:08 PM

Solaris 10 x86 - software RAID boot

What I can write in eeprom : - for boot form 1-st, and if it absent - from 2-nd disk ? (2 disks in soft raid). two bootpath ?
In Solaris 9/sparc for boot with one working HDD in mirror (2 disks in mirrir) I wrote in /etc/system : set md:mirrored_root_flag=1
What I can wrote for this in solaris 10/ x86 ?

Just for the record: The problem is solved.
I went on looking for more info on this message:
Oct 14 00:07:09 schille gda: [ID 107833 kern.notice] Sense Key: ICRC error during UDMAAnd then found an interesting post from 2004 by Juergen Keil:
The "bad block detected" message appears to be an old/obsolete error
message text, somewhere in the Solaris "ata" driver.
The ATA-1 standard (1997?) defined the 0x80 bit in the IDE
controller's error register as "bad block detected". (See page 32 on
<URL:http://www.t13.org/project/d0791r4c-ATA-1.pdf>)
The 0x80 bit seems to be "reserved" (undefined, not used any more)
with ATA-2 and ATA-3.
ATA-4 and newer now defines this bit 0x80 as ICRC "interface CRC error
has occurred during an Ultra DMA data transfer" when using ultra dma
transfers. (see the description of the "READ DMA" or "WRITE DMA"
command in <URL:http://www.t13.org/project/d1153r18-ATA-ATAPI-4.pdf>).
The Solaris ata driver seems to interpret the 0x80 bit according to
the old / obsolete 1997 ATA-1 standard.
So the "bad block detected" message seems to be a hint that some sort
of data corruption is happening on the IDE interface during UDMA data
transfers with the HDD. With UDMA capable disks it apparently does
not mean "the disk drive is dying".
I went to search what could cause a hardware datacorruption on my system and found that my internal removeable disktray was making bad contact.
After replacement everything worked as expected.

Grid Control Agent for Solaris 10 x86 32bit (not 64 bit)

Hi,
I am trying to locate the 32 bit version of Solaris 10 x86 agent for Grid Control OEM 11g (11.1.0.1.0).
There is only a X86 64 bit version listed at the download site.
My isainfo shows that solaris install is 32 bit.
Does anybody know if a 32 bit version of the agent for Grid Control 11g is available.

No ..Its not available yet.
Please contact Oracle Support.
Regards
Rajesh

64-bit JRE for Solaris 10 x86

I understand that this is not one of the supported configurations at this time. Could anyone comment if there are plans to support 64-bit Java on Solaris 10 x86?
Cheers,
~george

On the x86 solaris 10 system I'm looking at there is
a client VM
/bin/java -client -version
java version "1.5.0_12"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_12-b04)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_12-b04, mixed mode)
and a server VM
/bin/java -server -version
java version "1.5.0_12"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_12-b04)
Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_12-b04, mixed mode)
For the client the 64bit VM is still in development. I don't
think there are dates established for that yet.
If you can use the server VM, then you need to down
load the 64bit binaries. Then you will see
/bin/java -server -d64 -version
java version "1.5.0_12"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_12-b04)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.5.0_12-b04, mixed mode)
The downloads are at (look for the release you want)
http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp
Hope that helps.

Solaris 10 x86 64 bit Software

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for