Solaris 10 x86 ends in grub
Hi Frends!
When I try to boot Solaris 10 on my x86 PC it takes me to the GRUB> prompt.
Solaris 10 been a perfect gem of an Operating system been working perfectly fine till now.
My PC spec:
x86 PC Celeron 2.0 ghz
735 mb ram.
s3 prosavage ddr onboard
Primary : 5 GB Solaris
Primary: 10 GB Free FAT32
Primary: 5 GB Windows XP NTFS
Primary: 54 GB Free NTFS
Cause of the problem is as follows:
I wanted to install Netbeans and other SUN software so tried to make room my mounting the 10 GB FAT32 partition manually in solaris.
mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c0d0p0:1
This worked allright. To automate the process I added entry in /etc/vhstab file
#device device mount FS fsck mount
#to mount to fsck point type pass at boot
/dev/dsk/c0d0p0:1 - /c pcfs - yes -
Till here it worked fine.
After reboot the GRUB menu was gone and all I could get was the
GRUB> prompt
I tried the following in the GRUB>
root <enter>File system type unknown; parttype 0x7
root (hd0,0)File system type unknown; parttype 0xbf
root (hd0,1)File system type unknown; parttype 0x7
root (hd0,2)File system type unknown; parttype 0x7
root (hd0,3)File system type unknown; parttype 0x7
root (hd0,4)No filesystem
(hd0,0) contains the solaris10
GRUB>root (hd0,0)
GRUB>kernel /platform/i86pc/multiboot
Error 17: could not mount selected partition
or
GRUB>kernel /platform/i86pc/multiboot kernel/unix -s
Error 17: could not mount selected partition
or
GRUB>kernel /platform/i86pc/multiboot kernel/unix -B
Error 17: could not mount selected partition
GRUB>module /platform/i86pc/boot_archive
GRUB>boot
also tried
GRUB>find /grub/stage1
file not found
GRUB>find /grub/stage2
file not found
also tried
root (hd0,0)
setup (hd0,0)
Error 17: could not mount selected partition
Is there a way out of this or do i need to reinstall a fresh copy or repair using the Solaris DVD.
Please suggest a method by which i will be able to boot into the system from the GRUB> prompt and restore the system.
I faced a similar situation earlier but then i was able to follow the above steps to boot into the system and restore the menu.lst by using installgrub.
Please help.
Thank You in advance.
For the first time Solaris multiboot users, I recommend installing it as the last OS occupying the last primary partition (hd0,3). But it is possible to install Solaris, Linux then Windows if you are willing to edit menu.lst and add Linux and Windows boot stanzae manually. Any subsequent Windows or major service pack installation would wipe out grub installed by Solaris. But re-installation of grub that comes with Solaris is not that difficult - all you need is a boot cd/dvd or floppy disk containing usf version of grub.
# grub
grub> find /boot/grub/stage1
(hd0,0,a) This is the answer from grub and depends on whre your Solaris is located at+
grub> root (hd0,0,a)
filesystem is ufs, partition type 0xbf
grub> setup (hd0)
Checking if boot/grub/stage1 exists...yes
Checking if boot/grub/stage2 exists...yes
Checking if boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 exists...yes
Running embed /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5(hd0)...16 sectors
are embedded... succeeded
Running install /boot/grub/stage1(hd0) (hd0)1+16p (hd0,0,a)
/boot/grub/stage2/boot/grub/menu.lst... succeeded
Done.
grub> quit
# reboot
Solaris version of grub and Linux version appear and behave much the same but they are not interchangeable. Solaris version has enhanced support for both ufs and ext2 and Solaris slices (sub-partitions) whereas Linux version lacks all these features. Both versions can competently boot Windows by chain loading (pointing Windows boot partition) since all Windows contains its Windows specific boot loader (typically ntldr) pointer within its PBR (partition boot record).
You can however re-install grub within Solaris or Linux PBR instead of MBR so that they can be invoked from chain loading from Windows boot.ini or any third party boot loaders.
Unfortunately GNU grub makes various inconsistent boot scenarios since it writes menu.lst based on disk and partition hierarchy based on BIOS presented order at time of OS installation and has no ability to dynamically rewrite OS location in menu.lst thereafter even though its binary is able to see disk and partition hierarchy change on the fly. Therefore it hands wrong partition information of OS boot kernel image location simply following old menu.lst. That is why Solaris GUI based interactive installation omitted such options to install on a disk other than boot disk set from BIOS.
I do not have any working knowledge of other versions of grub even though their newest versions are 2.x. since the current Solaris and most other Unix like OS including Linux all use grub version 0.9x, If you want to install Solaris or Linux on the disks other than boot disk, then you need a BIOS that can easily re-assign boot order or hide the disk if you install Solaris on the second or third disk in the system that has multiple disks.
Back in Solaris 8 generation, there were debian and slackware linux kernel 2.1.x which can compile to mount, read and write access to Solaris version of ufs (Unix file system). But forget it with current Linux kernel 2.6.x. To boot Solaris manually from ufs version of grub is not as difficult as linux. Solaris kernel name is easy enough to memorise since it does not contain complicated version numbers and decimal points like linux. Good thing about manual boot from grub prompt will bypass wrong 'menu.lst' entry and gives you a chance to re-edit wrong 'menu.lst' entry.
There are no third party boot loaders I know of capable of re-editing Solaris menu.lst dynamically however installing System Commander or Ranish Boot Manager may help understanding various boot techniques. These third party boot loaders require a fat16 partition for its own use or shared with fat16 compatible OS for maximum flexibility since they need to store images of PBR, MBR, real and virtual partition tables, boot codes and the like in its OS management/tracking directory. System Commander can dynamically rewrite boot.ini after each partition change but such capability is limited on Windows platform only.
Learning of manual grub setup or unix/linux 'dd' command to back up MBR would always be great help to restore system after Windows wiping out grub or other boot images.
GNU grub www.gnu.org/software/grub/
GNU Parted www.sorcefroge.net
System Commander www.download.com
pinecloud,
Similar Messages
-
Core 2 Duo and solaris x86 11/06 works for me
This is FYI, since I seen (and posted) problems, but I haven't seen the solution posted.
I have successfully gotten solaris x86 11/06 to install and run on my core 2 duo machine. I had tried solaris x86 06/06, but I could only run in 32bit mode until patch 118855-19 was installed. It looks like 118855-33 is the baseline for 11/06.
With 06/06 I had to edit the grub command and add " kernel/unix" to the end of the 2nd line. This would force 32 bit mode rather than 64 bit. If I tried 64 bit, it would enter an endless reboot cycle. Once I installed the patch to 118855-19 I could run solaris 10 06/06 in 64 bit mode without issue.
Again, since solaris 10 11/06 is at 118855-33, it runs on my core2 machine straight from the install.
Hope this helpsOn a laptop there is little point with running a 64-bit operating system unless it physically has more than 4gb of ram, or if you are processing datasets exceeding 4GB of ram. Unless you're into assembly or use Solaris for some reason to manipulate media, little is to be gained by using 64-bit versions if anything. The increased pointer, integer, and padding causes more memory to use for the same software, most software on 64-bit operating systems runs in 32-bit mode because there is no need to have 16 exabyte memory addressing capability for anything but media encoders, giant databases, or extremely bloated single-threaded software. Sun Java Creator takes a heck of a lot of ram, but even at peak it's still under 4GB. If you move files bigger than 4GB, the ability to memory map all 4096MB might have less overhead on a 64-bit operating system, but generally from an end-user perspective, especially on a fast Intel or Opteron system, you won't notice the difference much. Solaris is bi-arch, a large chunk of Windows Vista and XP x64 is bi-arch, and most of FreeBSD and Linux are bi-arch in 64-bit versions, as I said, no point in making everything 64-bit. 64-bit device drivers is an issue for every OS, you should stick with 32-bit on a laptop, and hold off on desktops unless you need extended assembly registers available only in 64-bit mode.
-
Oracle 8.1.5 Client/WLS/Solaris x86
has anyone been able to get Oracle's client 8.1.5 running on Solaris x86 in conjunction with WLS to talk to back-end Oracle? Any help would be greatly appreciated.thanks.
This will not work. We have not built the native libraries to work with
Solaris on Intel..
I suggest trying the platform independent type 4 JDBC driver available for
free from Oracle. It is supported (as is any JDBC driver) with WebLogic
Server. To download it:
Go to http://www.oracle.com and select the "Download" option.
From the resulting page, use the "Select Utility or Driver" dropdown to
select Oracle JDBC drivers
From the resulting page, scroll down a little (since SQLJ stuff appears at
the top).
Or, to go directly there:
http://technet.oracle.com/software/tech/java/sqlj_jdbc/software_index.htm
Thanks,
Michael
Michael Girdley
BEA Systems Inc
"Dean Davis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3a267487$[email protected]..
has anyone been able to get Oracle's client 8.1.5 running on Solaris x86in conjunction with WLS to talk to back-end Oracle? Any help would be
greatly appreciated.thanks. -
Dell Hardware on Linux or Solaris x86
Hi,
My company is considering moving to dell hardware in a move to drive TCO down. We currently run Sun sparc (240, 490,890) servers and they are nearing end of life. Doing the research, even visited some vendors and from what we've seen, running either RH 5 or even Solaris (x86) on Dell could prove to be a good move. We're running mostly 10.2 databases with a couple of 9.2 that we hope to have upgraded by year end.
Has anyone made a similar move and what is your experience? I worked on Dell about 4 years ago and back then we felt there were reliability issues. They crashed a little too often for my liking. I realize some of it was do to OS panics and not just hardware but that is part of the package.
Any feedbackup would be greatly appreciated.If you're going to go Dell, you might aswell go the whole way and run RedHat.
Aside from the support issues mentioned (I'm not familiar with that aspect) Solaris has a history of being much more expensive to run (largely due to the cost of the employees that know it) with the major advantage being: better integration with Sun hardware.
As for Dell reliability, there's a reason we're an HP shop.. -
Please suggest the fastest way to install Solaris x86 PC 30 boxes
I've already tested one and it's successfully installed.
I have to install 30 boxes , all are same spec.
Please advise the fastest procedure to install.
Note : There is no sparc machine.Only problem with imaging a Solaris x86 box is that your machines will end up with the same hostid (which is pseudo-randomly generated at Solaris installation time for x86). This may, or may not, be a problem, depending on what commercial software you use...
To avoid this, you have to use jumpstart, or do some serious hacking. -
Does Oracle have any plan to fully certifiy Solaris x86-64 to have complete support on Peoplesoft (all tiers) not just for DBMS?
Edited by: user10790231 on Apr 7, 2009 9:08 AMYes, according to the PeopleTools roadmap presentation during the last Open World, PT8.50 could be fully supported on Solaris 64-bits.
Please, find out more (page 33) :
http://blogs.oracle.com/peopletools/PeopleTools%20Roadmap%20-%20OOW%202008%20-%20Part%202.pdf
But this is a roadmap, no garuantee that'll be the case at the end.
Nicolas. -
Hi,
Can you please let me know the advantages of running SAP on Solaris X86 or SPARC machines. Which is recommended?
Thanks
Joyce> If the compnay has very few end users to work on SAP i.e. less than 50 users, then x86 is suited.
> FOr large ended systems that is for large number of users to work on SAP, SPARC is better choice.
> SPARC is recommended.
I'm sorry but this is simply not true.
x86_64 is VERY suited for big systems, we run x86_64 systems with 1000+ users, on Solaris and on Linux.
Solaris on x86_64 is a very good choice, a mature OS with lots of features (zones, ZFS...) running on affordable hardware.
SPARC is a RISC architecture, there are even drawbacks in performance if you use e. g. T-series systems (UltraSparc) for ABAP systems and databases (see Oracle Metalink ID 781763.1 - "Migration from fast single threaded CPU machine to CMT UltraSPARC T1 and T2 results in increased CPU reporting and diminished performance").
So it's a matter of taste and choice - and money.
Markus -
Which 10g release supports Solaris x86 version 10?
Hi,
I downloaded Oracle 10.1.0.3 for Solaris x86. When I installed it, I got error, saying I can only install this version on Solaris 9 x86. Do you have any idea which Oracle 10g version supports Solaris x86 version 10?
Thanks
LHi,
If we believe metalink, Oracle 10gR1 is already certified for Solaris x86
Solaris Operating System x86 Version 10
Oracle Database - Enterprise Edition Version 10g
Status: Certified
Certification Note:
Install Information:
o 1. Execute runInstaller with the -ignoreSysPrereqs option.
o 2. Select 'Do not create a starter database' when installing Oracle 10g.
o 3. During installation, the warning message 'SUNWsprox package not installed' can be ignored. Press Continue to resume the installation.
o 4. Download and install patch 4186426 from metalink.oracle.com after installing Oracle 10g software.
o 5. If you have an End User Solaris 10 distribution, install the SUNWuiu8 package prior to installing the 10g client.
Have you run installer like recommended in point 1 ?
For 10gR2, you need to wait december for certification.
Nicolas. -
ZFS Configuration Question - Also posted in Solaris x86
Hello,
I have 2 x 140GB (hw Raid-0 + spare). About 20GB is allocated to Solaris on UFS (standard installation and partitions/slices).
I would like to allocate the 120GB left on the disk drive to ZFS. That space is not unallocated to any file system for now.
I found a lot of documentation of how to create a ZFS Pool on an empty disk drive. The documentation is less clear on how to do it on a drive already use by another FS.
Any help will be appreciated.
MichelDarren,
I just setup another Solaris x86 server tonight to play with. That future production server is in it's own vlan wtih no Internet access for now.
The test server has the same configuration, but less disk space.
Here is the output of prtvtoc
# prtvtoc /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0
* /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 partition map
* Dimensions:
* 512 bytes/sector
* 63 sectors/track
* 255 tracks/cylinder
* 16065 sectors/cylinder
* 2350 cylinders
* 2348 accessible cylinders
* Flags:
* 1: unmountable
* 10: read-only
* First Sector Last
* Partition Tag Flags Sector Count Sector Mount Directory
0 2 00 10522575 27198045 37720619 /
1 3 01 16065 8401995 8418059
2 5 00 0 37720620 37720619
7 8 00 8418060 2104515 10522574 /export/home
8 1 01 0 16065 16064
Output of format
selecting c0t0d0
[disk formatted]
Warning: Current Disk has mounted partitions.
/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 is currently mounted on /. Please see umount(1M).
Total disk size is 8920 cylinders
Cylinder size is 16065 (512 byte) blocks
Cylinders
Partition Status Type Start End Length %
====== ====== ============ ===== === ====== ===
1 Active Solaris2 1 2350 2350 26
As you can see, the 1st partition is used at 26%. With fdisk, I can create a 2nd partition. My problem is to get that 2nd partiition availlable to Solaris and create a zpool in that unused space..
Michel -
not sure if this is the right place, but couldn't see one that was more germaine.
i just used dbca to remove a 10gR1 database from a system and then used runInstaller to remove the binaries. it hung up the system and ended up corrupting the mounted filesystem -- we had to do a umount and fsck to get it back and all the bad nodes were oracle nodes.
has anyone else had or heard of this kind of situation? is this a bug? did i do something wrong?
help?We are doing work on converging the JVMs (Hotspot and JRockit). Solaris x86 is supported today for hotspot, and will be supported by the converged JVM as it is released.
As things stand right now, JRockit will not be supported on Solaris x86 until JRockit will be replaced by the converged JVM. -
Mounting a Solaris x86 CD/DVD from a remote Windows CD/DVD-ROM drive
Greetings, all.
Is it possible to mount a remote Windows CD/DVD-ROM drive? I have the Solaris 10x86 Companion Software DVD sitting in a CD/DVD-ROM drive that's installed on a Windows server on my network. It is shared-out (F:) and the two servers can ping each other. I've also confirmed the NFS services/daemons are running on the Solaris x86 machine. I've tried the following variations but, all have failed to produce successful results:
# mount -F nfs x.x.x.x:/f /mnt
nfs mount: x.x.x.x: : RPC: Program not registered
nfs mount: retrying: /mnt
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/f /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/f
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/F /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/F
[FYI: S10_106_SOFTWARE is the DVD's label as reported by Windows Explorer.]
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/S10_106_SOFTWARE /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/S10_106_SOFTWARE
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/s10_106_software /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/s10_106_software
# mount -F nfs x.x.x.x:/S10_106_SOFTWARE /mnt
nfs mount: x.x.x.x: : RPC: Program not registered
nfs mount: retrying: /mnt
# mount -F nfs x.x.x.x:/s10_106_software /mnt
nfs mount: x.x.x.x: : RPC: Program not registered
nfs mount: retrying: /mnt
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/f/s10_106_software /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/f/s10_106_software
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/F/s10_106_software /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/F/s10_106_software
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/f/S10_106_SOFTWARE /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/f/S10_106_SOFTWARE
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/F/S10_106_SOFTWARE /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/F/S10_106_SOFTWARE
I've also tried mounting it at bootup by adding the appropriate entry in the /etc/vfstab file but, this does not work as well. I've tried Google'ing for an answer to my issue but, I haven't been able to find anything that applies directly to what I'm reporting. It's usually chatter about mounting from one UNIX server to another. Any advice from the community would be greatly appreciated.After three weeks, you deserve a reply. Windoze does
not natively support NFS.Also deserves a decent answer...
There are two ways to do this:
Install Microsoft's free "Windows Services for UNIX," which includes a Windows NFS server; or
Install the 'sharity' package (google for it); it provides Solaris systems the ability to mount Windows shares -
Install oracle 8.1.7 on Solaris(x86) 10 b72
Has anyone Installed oracle 8.1.7 on Solaris(x86) 10 b72???
When I run runInstaller I have
135$ Initializing Java Virtual Machine from ../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/jre. Please wait...
ld.so.1: /ora_inst/stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/i386/native_threads/jre: fatal: relocation error: file /ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so: symbol XShmQueryExtension: referenced symbol not found (/ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so)
ld.so.1: /ora_inst/stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/i386/native_threads/jre: fatal: relocation error: file /ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so: symbol XShmQueryExtension: referenced symbol not found (/ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so)
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:try this:
LD_PRELOAD="libX11.so libXext.so" ; export LD_PRELOAD
./runInstaller -
Install error for Oracle 10g on Solaris x86 64-bit. NETCA won't run
Hi All,
I'm installing Oracle 10.2.0.1 on Solaris x86 64-bit. I run the Oracle installer and all runs well until the NETCA portion of the install. It then errors (error file below). When i attempt to run NETCA outside of the installer i'm getting the same error output. I have verified my OS version and that all dependent packages are installed. I'm not sure what is causing this. Any help would be greatly appriciated.
thanks, dave
ERROR FILE:
An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0xFEEF24E8
Function=strchr+0x8
Library=/lib/libc.so.1
Current Java thread:
at oracle.net.common.NetGetEnv.getDNSDomain(Native Method)
at oracle.net.ca.ConfigureProfile.setDefaultProfileParams(Unknown Source)
at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.setupConfigObjects(Unknown Source)
at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.<init>(Unknown Source)
at oracle.net.ca.NetCA.main(Unknown Source)
Dynamic libraries:
0x8050000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/bin/java
0xfefc0000 /lib/libthread.so.1
0xfefd0000 /lib/libdl.so.1
0xfeed0000 /lib/libc.so.1
0xfea00000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
0xfee80000 /usr/lib/libCrun.so.1
0xfee50000 /lib/libsocket.so.1
0xfedc0000 /lib/libnsl.so.1
0xfeda0000 /lib/libm.so.1
0xfeeb0000 /usr/lib/libsched.so.1
0xfe9a0000 /lib/libm.so.2
0xfed50000 /lib/libscf.so.1
0xfe980000 /lib/libdoor.so.1
0xfe960000 /lib/libuutil.so.1
0xfe940000 /lib/libmd5.so.1
0xfe920000 /lib/libmp.so.2
0xfe8e0000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/native_threads/libhpi.so
0xfe890000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libverify.so
0xfe850000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so
0xfe830000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libzip.so
0xf1a00000 /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8.so.3
0xfc780000 /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/methods_en_US.UTF-8.so.3
0xf13c0000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libawt.so
0xf0f90000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libmlib_image.so
0xf0f30000 /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/motif21/libmawt.so
0xf0d50000 /usr/dt/lib/libXm.so.4
0xf0cf0000 /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.4
0xf0cc0000 /usr/openwin/lib/libXext.so.0
0xf1890000 /usr/openwin/lib/libXtst.so.1
0xf0c30000 /usr/openwin/lib/libX11.so.4
0xf0be0000 /usr/openwin/lib/libdps.so.5
0xf0a90000 /usr/openwin/lib/libSM.so.6
0xf0a70000 /usr/openwin/lib/libICE.so.6
0xf0a30000 /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnjni10.so
0xefe00000 /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libclntsh.so.10.1
0xefc60000 /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnnz10.so
0xf0a10000 /lib/libkstat.so.1
0xefc40000 /lib/libgen.so.1
0xefc20000 /lib/librt.so.1
0xefbf0000 /lib/libaio.so.1
0xefbd0000 /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libldapjclnt10.so
Heap at VM Abort:
Heap
def new generation total 576K, used 343K [0xf1e00000, 0xf1ea0000, 0xf22e0000)
eden space 512K, 55% used [0xf1e00000, 0xf1e467f8, 0xf1e80000)
from space 64K, 96% used [0xf1e80000, 0xf1e8f798, 0xf1e90000)
to space 64K, 0% used [0xf1e90000, 0xf1e90000, 0xf1ea0000)
tenured generation total 1408K, used 338K [0xf22e0000, 0xf2440000, 0xf5e00000)
the space 1408K, 24% used [0xf22e0000, 0xf2334ab8, 0xf2334c00, 0xf2440000)
compacting perm gen total 4096K, used 3580K [0xf5e00000, 0xf6200000, 0xf9e00000)
the space 4096K, 87% used [0xf5e00000, 0xf617f170, 0xf617f200, 0xf6200000)
Local Time = Tue Aug 29 13:49:22 2006
Elapsed Time = 225
# The exception above was detected in native code outside the VM
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_05-b04 mixed mode)
#I have the same problem on Linux Debian 3.0.
My /etc/hosts looks like:
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
#192.168.100.1 bt.lan.home bt
#192.168.100.5 jacek.lan.home jacek
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
ff02::3 ip6-allhostsPlease help. -
How to upgrade oracle 32 to 64 bit on sun solaris x86 64 bit OS?
Hi,
I want to upgrade/convert 32 bit Oracle Database 10.2.0.2 to 64 bit database. Existing 32 bit database is RAC and it is running on Sun Solaris X86 64 bit OS.
First, I want to know is it possible?
If yes, then what are the exact steps?Hi,
Such a migration can be done, just follow the steps in Metalink note 62290.1
It is important to remember that 64-bit database requires more shared pool memory so you should increase your shared pool size.
Liron Amitzi
Senior DBA consultant
[www.dbsnaps.com]
[www.orbiumsoftware.com]
Edited by: Liron Amitzi on Jul 1, 2009 3:08 PM -
How to integrate a Solaris x86 server on Sun Management Center ?
Hello people,
I want to integrate a Solaris x86 server on Sun Management Center platform.
If I'm not wrong, SunMC doesn't run for Solaris x86, server and client only as console with Java.
In speat of it, I try to install Sun Management Center 3.0 Agent for Solaris x86.
It seems to be ok, install packages, but when execute es-setup script, intents to create the following directory:
/opt/SUNWsymon/base/bin/sparc-sun-solaris2.8
I supose that in this directory, SunMC will install sparc binary files
At this point, I can't follow the installation and abort it.
Can anybody give me ideas to install and integrate my solaris x86 server on SunMC ?
ThanksHi Hisham,
hishooooo wrote:
Dear Gents,
I have one X86 Solaris Server configured and installed to be Sun Management Center Server.
successfully i could monitor the Sun Solaris Servers after i have installed the SMC agent on them.
my problem is that i could not install the SMC agent on Red Hat Linux. as i could not find an easy document or steps to do so.
could you guide please?If you still have a copy of your SunMC media around, the same ["es-inst"|http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-2215/command-line-1?l=en&a=view] program you use to install Solaris Agents should work on Linux as well. It autodetects OS type and will install Solaris packages or RPMs as appropriate.
Regards,
[email protected]
http://www.HalcyonInc.com
Maybe you are looking for
-
I had a network with comcast cable modem high speed internet. I had it connected and working until my desktop computer (emachine) had to be replaced. I replaced it with a HP Pavillion Windows ME computer, it was a wired connection. I had three oth
-
I am running OS 10.6.8 and Safari 5.1. Option-Command-Escape now brings up Front Row. How can this be fixed? Also, trying to copy portions of articles from Safari (5.1) to MS Word now results in the twirling ball. Any solutions?
-
Package permissions problem with Snow Leopard
Under Leopard, changing permissions at the Get Info window for a package file also changes the package contents to the same permission settings. This no longer works in Snow Leopard. For example, I have tried adding another user name with read & writ
-
Mail Notifications Not Appearing
I have just noticed that my mail notifications are not appearing on the side. I have double checked that all of the settings are right, but still no joy. Anyone got any ideas.
-
I downloaded the latest iOS7 to my iPad and then the screen went blank and would not respond. I have tried pressing the two buttons together and briefly get the Apple logo but still can not restart, the logo disappears. I have tried connecting to