SOLARIS 2.5.1 = Bind Version??

Someone know what is the version of bind that run on sol 2.5.1?
i`ve reinstalled my netra i with the recovery CD software, and i need to update the version of bind, someone know if the administration software will work with this new version of bind (named) ??
i`m about to use the new version bind 9.1.3 downloaded from sunfreeware.

When the keyboard is disconnected...display automatically goes to the serial port. If your keyboard is connected, reboot and make sure you have a video card installed. The onboard one may not have the vsimm(video memory) option, in which case you will have to get memory for it(very, very expensive) or get a separate sbus video card(these can be had very cheap on ebay). Let us know how it works out for you.

Similar Messages

Solaris Dev 11 and Bind version

I tried to load Sol 10 on IBM and it was no go, loaded 11 Dev no problem except I had to also add the Broadcom drivers to get the NICS up.
I think that 10 and 11 use BIND 9, but I have been told that I must use BIND 8 for my project.
Any info on how to go from BIND 9 to BIND 8 on Sol 11 Dev edition would be appreciated.
Thanks

OK, the reason we had to stay at 8 has to do with rrset fixed not working in 9, until now, evidently it is now working in BIND 9.4.1
So I am using Solaris Express 11, it has BIND 9.3.4, I went to freesunware and got there pkgadd version of BIND 9.4.1, I did pkgadd and it placed a lot of files in /usr/local
I checked named -v and 9.3.4 is running right now for nslookup type dns client functions (so the web surfing will work for example)
I need to actually setup a DNS server, I did not try on 9.3.4 but it is on the machine by default.
What do I now need to do to get 9.3.4 off this machine (or at least disabled) and to get 9.4.1 up and running on this machine.
I have files from our other server that I am replacing like named.conf and a db that I will also be adding so I can get this thing ready to field and replace the old machine.
But first, what do I do to disable the old BIND and get the new version in /usr/local up and running.
Thanks

DNS requests from Solaris 10 box to Bind/MySQL DNS server fail

We have some servers running solaris 9 and some running solaris 10. We also have a DNS server setup running BIND with the MySQL backend. When I query the DNS server from our solaris 9 boxes, they always work just fine. However, when I query the DNS server from our solaris 10 boxes, they always fail. Queries to other DNS servers from the Solaris 10 boxes work just fine - they only fail when being sent to this particular DNS server. Here's exactly what I'm doing:
ON SOLARIS 9 BOX:
bash-3.00$ nslookup google.com calo-sunset
Server: calo-sunset
Address: <IP_OF_DNS_SERVER>#53
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: google.com
Address: 64.233.187.99
Name: google.com
Address: 72.14.207.99
Name: google.com
Address: 209.85.171.99
ON SOLARIS 10 BOX:
bash-2.05$ nslookup google.com calo-sunset
*** Can't find server name for address <IP_OF_DNS_SERVER>: Non-existent host/domain
*** Default servers are not available
In the case of the SOLARIS 10 box, <IP_OF_DNS_SERVER> is correct - it knows the IP address of the DNS server, but apparently it doesn't recognize that it's actually a DNS server.
I am utterly perplexed by this. It seems to me that a DNS request is a DNS request, regardless of your OS. Clearly something is different from Solaris 9 to Solaris 10 though because the requests fail on all of our solaris 10 boxes, and they succeed on all of our Solaris 9 boxes. Incidentally, dig requests from the Solaris 10 box also fail, where they succeed on the Solaris 9 boxes.
I don't really know what other information I could offer that might be useful. If you have any information at all about this or ideas on what I might try to troubleshoot/fix it, I'd love to hear it. Thanks in advance.

First off, I am an idiot. I got this entire post backwards. The fact is that the DNS requests work swimmingly well on our Solaris 10 boxes. They fail on our Solaris 9 boxes. I don't know how I managed to read this post all of these times and not notice that I got that backwards. Nice.
In any case, I've found the problem. It was non-trivial to me because I am not terribly familiar with the inner-workings of DNS. To those who are, it may seem painfully obvious. To me it certainly was not.
The problem was that the DNS server (BIND 9 with MySQL backend) did not contain a reverse DNS entry for itself. Apparently this is a big problem for Solaris 9. I got a hint that this might be the cause when I turned on verbose debugging info when I ran nslookup (nslookup -d2). I had to add the PTR record for the DNS server itself. I don't know why Solaris 9 would require that a DNS server contain reverse DNS information about itself, but sure enough it does. As soon as I added that info, the Solaris 9 boxes were able to successfully query the DNS server. Very odd.
Anyway, I doubt anyone else will come across this problem, but if you do, now you know something that might fix it.
Edited by: dprater on Oct 7, 2008 8:09 PM

Solaris 10 Install - 10/09 version - screen resolution

Hi guys:
I just installed an x86 version of Solaris 10 10/09 onto Lenovo T61. GUI install would not come up, so I used a command line mode. It turned out that Solaris used a greater video resolution than 1024 and my screen does not handle that. What is the reason for an install using resolution greater then 1024, as well being a Solaris default screen resolution? Can that be changed during the install? Is there an issues area for Solaris 10?
Thanks
Leonid

I am not sure what went wrong, but after another non-GUI reinstall - option 4 on the install, my LCD is OK now.
I have also tried option 3 of the install - text desktop, also uses GUI - worked fine as well...
Edited by: shche123 on Dec 26, 2009 3:08 PM

Solaris 2.6 upgrade to version 8 on SUN ULTRA 10

Dear Mr. or Mrs:
I met the same question as uxdms who left the message on Dec 20,2001.
When I was trying to upgrade from solaris 2.6 to 8 release , there is "failed" warning and the upgrade isn't created.
There is a detailed info:
Mechine: SUN ULTRA 10
Media:
Solaris 8 installation -- SPARC Platform Edition
Solaris 8 software 1 of 2 -- SPARC Platform Edition
Solaris 8 software 2 of 2 -- SPARC Platform Edition
Installation step:
Accordidng to the guide of installation, run step by step,
and there are some special steps below:
(1) use the /dev/dsk /c0t0d0s4 as disk slice to upgrade.
(2) selet networked
(3) don't use DHCP
(4) disable IPv6
(5) no NIS+, NIS, DNS ..
.... displaying the wolcome to solaris dialog box
(1) Solaris 8 installation SPARC Platform Edition is ejected.
(2) prompted to insert the Solaris 8 software 1 of 2.
(3)After selecting serial the dialog box of the upgrade..
(4)system prompted upgrading...
initialation is done.
Checking file system is done.
(5) There is a installation summary displayed:
installation summary
The solaris installation status is shown below
product status infor.
Solaris 8 software Failed Detailed(button)
After click the Detailed button, there is a dialog box
Failed:
Log file: /a/var/sadm.system/logs/upgrade_log
Question is:
I can't find the file of upgrade_log , and the webstart install stops on it.
I appreciate for your kind help
Melanie
the webstart install stops on initalization -- with 'failed' warning

Hi,
If this problem is reproduceable, provide me the exact console error (failed) message to further investigate on this issue.
Senthilkumar
Developer Technical Support
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
http://www.sun.com/developers/support

Oracle 9i RAC on Sun Solaris 5.10/64 bit version.Is that supported ?

I want to install Oracle 9i RAC on Sun Solaris 10 64 bit. Is that officially supported ?
I dont this combination on metalink certify matrix

I know we dont get support from oracle.But, you initially mentioned that you couldn't find the required information on metalink, therefore I provided that information, which I thought you were looking for.
Is anybody still using this combination ? Does it work ? yes, we are using it and it has been working fine for over 4 years...of course we patched it to the latest - 9.2.0.8 to be on the supported release/patch.

Solaris 2.6 upgrade to version 8

When trying to upgrade an E450 (3 Gb swap) from Solaris 2.6 to 8 release 01/01, the webstart install stops on initialization - with 'failed' warning - and the upgrade-log isn't created.
Thanks for any help.

Hi,
If this problem is reproduceable, provide me the exact console error (failed) message to further investigate on this issue.
Senthilkumar
Developer Technical Support
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
http://www.sun.com/developers/support

Solaris FRM-92150 "WEB Client Version too new"

Hello,
Does ANYONE have Java forms working on Solaris? I have my doubts that this works at all.
We are migrating from a Windows Froms6i server to one on Solaris. On windows I was using Forms6iR2 patch 5 (forms 6.0.8.14.1 and Jinitiator 1.1.8.10). I downloaded the equivelant patch for Solaris (Patch 5a). I've install everything and run the Forms server in socket mode and I get the FRM-92150 error when it tries to load the form.
We are using IE 5.5sp2. I've have recompiled the FMX files, updated the jinitiator classid in the static.html file. I've tried all the suggestions I found on Metalink but none of seem to apply to me. Most of them say to relink/rebuild the shard objects but I did that. I even tried going to patch 6 and patch 8 (and updating my Jinitator with the one in the patch) and I get the same error.
Trevor

Just in case you anyone is wondering I found out what my problem was.
"READ THE DOCUMENTATION". :)
I forgot to do this step after the install was completed:
6. Relink Procedure Builder, Forms, Reports and Graphics to
pick up changes via installer or:
Note: Oracle Applications customers might not be required to complete
these steps; they should review the Oracle Applications
documentation.
Note for Reports linking : Reports has link time dependency with
libjava.so so you need to append
$ORACLE_HOME/network/jre11/lib/sparc/native_threads in $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
before linking Reports.
(cd $ORACLE_HOME/procbuilder60/lib; make -f ins_procbuilder.mk install)
(cd $ORACLE_HOME/forms60/lib; make -f ins_forms60w.mk install)
(cd $ORACLE_HOME/reports60/lib; make -f ins_reports60w.mk install)
(cd $ORACLE_HOME/graphics60/lib; make -f ins_graphics60w.mk install)

Solaris 10 Update 6 with ISA Bind 9.9.3-P2

Due to CVE-2014-8500, We need to upgrade ISC Bind version to 9.10.2.
If we apply Solaris patch
20-Jan-2015
Bind
CVE-2014-8500
SPARC: 119783-30 X86: 119784-30
Will it resolve the issue?

Yes, and this is documented in MOS doc ID 1448883.1

Need latest acrobat reader for solaris 10 sparc version

i need latest acrobat reader for solaris 10 sparc version
checked adobe site it is only avilable for linux and not for solaris, very strange

There's no version of Adobe Reader XI for Solaris.
The only versions you can download are legacy - see the complete list here: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=10&platform=Unix

Multiple jdk versions on solaris--best practices and advice

I am a newcomer to solaris system administration (not by choice--I am normally just a Java programmer, but am now responsible for testing code on a new solaris box), so apologies for the newbie questions below.
#1: is it typical for a brand new solaris install to have multiple versions of Java on it?
After installation, which left me with this version of solaris:
     SunOS asm03 5.10 Generic_120011-14 sun4v sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5220I find from pkginfo, that their are 2 old versions of java installed:
     SUNWj3dev     J2SDK 1.4 development tools
SUNWj3dmo     J2SDK 1.4 demo programs
SUNWj3dvx     J2SDK 1.4 development tools (64-bit)
SUNWj3irt     JDK 1.4 I18N run time environment
SUNWj3jmp     J2SDK 1.4 Japanese man pages
SUNWj3man     J2SDK 1.4 man pages
SUNWj3rt      J2SDK 1.4 runtime environment
SUNWj3rtx     J2SDK 1.4 runtime environment (64-bit)
SUNWj5cfg     JDK 5.0 Host Config. (1.5.0_12)
SUNWj5dev     JDK 5.0 Dev. Tools (1.5.0_12)
SUNWj5dmo     JDK 5.0 Demo Programs (1.5.0_12)
SUNWj5dmx     JDK 5.0 64-bit Demo Programs (1.5.0_12)
SUNWj5dvx     JDK 5.0 64-bit Dev. Tools (1.5.0_12)
SUNWj5jmp     JDK 5.0 Man Pages: Japan (1.5.0_12)
SUNWj5man     JDK 5.0 Man Pages (1.5.0_12)
SUNWj5rt      JDK 5.0 Runtime Env. (1.5.0_12)
SUNWj5rtx     JDK 5.0 64-bit Runtime Env. (1.5.0_12)Both of these versions are years old; I am surprised that there is not just a single version of JDK 1.6 installed; it only came out, what, going on 2 years ago? I definitely need JDK 1.6 for all of my software to run.
On my windows and linux boxes, I never usually have multiple JDKs; I always deinstall the current one before installing a new one. So, I went first to try and deinstall JDK 1.4 by executing
     pkgrm SUNWj3dev SUNWj3dmo SUNWj3dvx SUNWj3irt SUNWj3jmp SUNWj3man SUNWj3rt SUNWj3rtxThe package manager detected dependencies like
WARNING:
     The <SUNWmccom> package depends on the package currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWmcc> package depends on the package currently being removed.
[+ 8 more]and I decided to abort deinstallation because I have no diea what all these other programs are, and I do not want to cripple my system.
If anyone has any idea what programs Sun is shipping that still depend on JDK 1.4, please enlighten me.
#2: Is there any easy way to not only deinstall, say, JDK 1.4 but also deinstall all packages which depend on it?
Maybe this is too dangerous.
#3: Is there at least a way that I can find all the programs which depend on an entire group of packages like
     SUNWj3dev SUNWj3dmo SUNWj3dvx SUNWj3irt SUNWj3jmp SUNWj3man SUNWj3rt SUNWj3rtx?
The above functionality would have come in real handy if I could have done it before doing what I describe next.
I next decided to try removing JDK 1.5, so I executed
     pkgrm SUNWj5cfg SUNWj5dev SUNWj5dmo SUNWj5dmx SUNWj5dvx SUNWj5jmp SUNWj5man SUNWj5rt SUNWj5rtxI thought that this command would let me know of any dependencies of ANY of the packages that are listed. It doesn't. Instead, it merely checks the first one, and if no dependencies are found, then removes it before marching down the list. In the case above, it happily removed SUNWj5cfg because there were no dependencies on it. Then it stalled on SUNWj5dev because it found dependencies like:
WARNING:
     The <SUNWmctag> package depends on the package currently being removed.
WARNING:
     The <SUNWmcon> package depends on the package currently being removed.
[+ 3 more]#4: Have I left my JDK 1.5 crippled by removing SUNWj5cfg? Or was this pretty harmless?
#5: Was I fairly stupid to attempt the deinstallations above in the first place? Do solaris people normally leave old JDKs in place?
#6: Or is it the case that those dependency warnings are harmless: I can go ahead and remove all old JDKs, because java programs will always find the new JDK and should run just fine with it?
#7 Whats the deal with solaris and having multiple packages for something like the JDK? With Windows, for instance, the entire JDK has a single installer and deinstaller program. Its much easier to work with that the corresponding Solaris stuff. Do Solaris people simply need that much finer grained control over what gets installed and what doesn't? (Actually, with the Windows JDK, the gui installer program can let you install selected components should you wish; I am just not sure how scriptable this is versus the solaris stuff, which may be more sys admin friendly if you have to administer many machines.)

The easiest thing to do is to just install the latest into a clean directoryI believe different versions of jdk install into their own separate directory by default. All one needs to do is recreate the symbolic links that point to the version they want to use. The java install documentation has the details.

Does Windows Forms Builder version need to match Solaris A/S version ?

We have Forms Builder 10.1.2.0.2 on our Windows client developer PCs. Recently we patched our Solaris Application Server to 10.1.2.2.0.
Do we need to patch our client Forms Builder in order to match versions, since we only design and save the forms in Windows ? (they get moved and compiled on Solaris)
Thanks,
Dave

The AS Forms version must be not lower than Forms Builder version. We develop some applications with Forms 6i (Client), and compile the same on AS 10.1.2.

Where can I find BIND and C-compiler software

I just install Solaris 8 on my sunblade, i t will be used as a test DNS server. Does anyone know where can I find/download the BIND and CC software? Is it on the installation CD or do I need to download. Thanks.
Sonny

It might be on the "Software Companion" CD in the Bonus Software booklet but gcc & bind are also located at:
http://sunfreeware.com/
Click on Sparc/Solaris 8 to see what versions are available.
Download info & FAQs are in left column.
John

Errors during Solaris 11/11 to 11.1 upgrade

Hi,
I originally resurrected a thread from 2012 and attempted to hijack it away for my own question. However, a kind forum moderator split it away to let it stand on its own since I wasn't trying to help that original post but was only concerned about my own system.
Here's my post:
#Am also trying to upgrade our local AI 11/11 server to 11.1 but finding similar errors. First I've updated our local 11/11 repo with SRU 13.4 and then updated the AI server's BE from this successfully
root@sol11:~# beadm list
BE                   Active Mountpoint Space Policy Created
sol-11-1111-sru13_04 NR     /          39.91G static 2013-01-21 11:18
solaris              -      -          7.50M static 2011-12-09 09:15
root@sol11:~# pkg list entire
NAME (PUBLISHER)                                  VERSION                    IFO
entire (solaris)                                  0.5.11-0.175.0.13.0.4.0    i--#Then trying to follow http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/servers-storage-admin/howto-update-11dot1-ips-1866781.html
root@sol11:~# pkg update --accept
WARNING: pkg(5) appears to be out of date, and should be updated before
running update. Please update pkg(5) by executing 'pkg install
pkg:/package/pkg' as a privileged user and then retry the update.
root@sol11:~# pkg update pkg:/package/pkg
            Packages to remove: 1
       Create boot environment: No
Create backup boot environment: No
PHASE                                        ACTIONS
Removal Phase                                  13/13
PHASE                                          ITEMS
Package State Update Phase                       1/1
Package Cache Update Phase                       1/1
Image State Update Phase                         2/2 # DWL entire 11.1 ISO file from 11.jan 2013 and copied repo onto AI server and switched publisher to this repo:
root@sol11:~# pkg publisher
PUBLISHER                             TYPE     STATUS   URI
local-solaris
solaris                               origin   online   file:///export/sol11.1_ipsrepo/
root@sol11:~# pkg update --be-name s11.1ga --accept
Creating Plan \
pkg update: No solution was found to satisfy constraints
Plan Creation: Package solver has not found a solution to update to latest available versions.
This may indicate an overly constrained set of packages are installed.
latest incorporations:
pkg://solaris/consolidation/admin/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.5.0:20111212T232623Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/l10n/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.23.1134:20120820T154803Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/userland/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.0:20120904T170613Z
pkg://solaris/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.2:20120919T190135Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/install/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.1736:20120912T193249Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/sunpro/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.19.0:20120625T151735Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/gfx/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.5.0:20111212T232623Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/sfw/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.5.0:20111212T232623Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/ips/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.0:20120904T180327Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/ldoms/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.21.1:20120723T182124Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/vpanels/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.17.0:20120529T220223Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/dbtg/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.15.0:20120501T214422Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/X/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.1317:20120904T175757Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/man/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.21.0:20120723T163455Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/desktop/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.2:20120919T183843Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/nspg/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.5.0:20111212T232623Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/sic_team/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.5.0:20111212T230120Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/SunVTS/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.14.0:20120416T200729Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/solaris_re/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.3:20120919T185316Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/smcc/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.5.0:20111212T232623Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/cns/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.23.0:20120820T162238Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/cacao/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.11.0:20120305T152551Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/osnet/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.2:20120919T184141Z
pkg://solaris/consolidation/desktop/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.22.0:20120806T171142Z
The following indicates why the system cannot update to the latest version:
No suitable version of required package pkg://solaris/consolidation/userland/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.0:20120904T170613Z found:
    Reject: pkg://solaris/consolidation/userland/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.0:20120904T170613Z
    Reason: A version for 'incorporate' dependency on pkg:/network/dns/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.0 cannot be found*# Why and how to resolve this issue?*
*#TIA*
#Just in case you ask:
root@sol11:~# pkg info entire
Name: entire
Summary: entire incorporation including Support Repository Update (Oracle Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 13.4).
Description: This package constrains system package versions to the same
build. WARNING: Proper system update and correct package
selection depend on the presence of this incorporation.
Removing this package will result in an unsupported system. For
more information see https://support.oracle.com/CSP/main/article
?cmd=show&type=NOT&doctype=REFERENCE&id=1372094.1.
Category: Meta Packages/Incorporations
State: Installed
Publisher: solaris
Version: 0.5.11 (Oracle Solaris 11 SRU 13.4)
Build Release: 5.11
Branch: 0.175.0.13.0.4.0
Packaging Date: November 6, 2012 07:46:23 PM
Size: 5.45 kB
FMRI: pkg://solaris/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.13.0.4.0:20121106T194623Z
root@sol11:~# pkg info consolidation/osnet/osnet-incorporation
Name: consolidation/osnet/osnet-incorporation
Summary: OS/Net consolidation incorporation
Description: This incorporation constrains packages from the OS/Net
consolidation.
Category: Meta Packages/Incorporations
State: Installed
Publisher: solaris
Version: 0.5.11
Build Release: 5.11
Branch: 0.175.0.13.0.4.1
Packaging Date: November 6, 2012 07:31:22 PM
Size: 17.15 kB
FMRI: pkg://solaris/consolidation/osnet/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.13.0.4.1:20121106T193122Z

Yes also indicated previously, only I found that I also needed to remove two more packages before upgrading successfully, see below.
Thanks for your reply!
Removing installadm pkg along made it possible to upgrade from 11/11-SRU13-4 to 11.1...
root@sol11:~# pkg uninstall pkg:/service/network/dhcp/isc-dhcp pkg://solaris/install/installadm
Packages to remove: 2
Create boot environment: No
Create backup boot environment: No
Services to change: 3
PHASE ACTIONS
Removal Phase 166/166
PHASE ITEMS
Package State Update Phase 2/2
Package Cache Update Phase 2/2
Image State Update Phase 2/2
The following unexpected or editable files and directories were
salvaged while executing the requested package operation; they
have been moved to the displayed location in the image:
var/db/isc-dhcp/dhcpd4.leases~ -> /var/pkg/lost+found/var/db/isc-dhcp/dhcpd4.leases~-20130122T143604Z
var/db/isc-dhcp/dhcpd4.leases -> /var/pkg/lost+found/var/db/isc-dhcp/dhcpd4.leases-20130122T143604Z
root@sol11:~# pkg update be-name s11.1ga accept
Package: pkg://solaris/consolidation/osnet/[email protected],5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.2:20120919T184141Z
License: usr/src/pkg/license_files/lic_OTN
Packages to remove: 10
Packages to install: 40
Packages to update: 415
Mediators to change: 2
Create boot environment: Yes
Create backup boot environment: No
DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB)
Completed 465/465 24964/24964 445.9/445.9
PHASE ACTIONS
Removal Phase 9898/9898
Install Phase 18235/18235
Update Phase 14665/14665
PHASE ITEMS
Package State Update Phase 878/878
Package Cache Update Phase 424/424
Image State Update Phase 2/2
A clone of sol-11-1111-sru13_04 exists and has been updated and activated.
On the next boot the Boot Environment s11.1ga will be
mounted on '/'. Reboot when ready to switch to this updated BE.
NOTE: Please review release notes posted at:
https://support.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=NOT&doctype=REFERENCE&id=1372094.1
# reinstall earlier removed pkg
root@sol11:~# pkg install pkg:/service/network/dhcp/isc-dhcp pkg://solaris/install/installadm pkg://solaris/network/dns/bind pkg://solaris/service/network/dns/bind
Packages to install: 4
Create boot environment: No
Create backup boot environment: No
Services to change: 3
DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB) SPEED
Completed 4/4 128/128 4.5/4.5 0B/s
PHASE ITEMS
Installing new actions 286/286
Updating package state database Done
Updating image state Done
Creating fast lookup database Done
root@sol11:~# pkg list entire
NAME (PUBLISHER) VERSION IFO
entire (solaris) 0.5.11-0.175.1.0.0.24.2 i--

DNS PRoblem in SOLARIS 9.0

Hi
can any one help me on this
I am facing dns problem in solaris sparc 9.0. I am not able to see
" /etc/named.conf" .If i type in.named -v it is showing BIND version .is it required to install bind seprately.
I downloaded BIND from sunfreeware i tried to compile but it is throghing the error something like "make cannot build" after running "./confiugre"
One more query is it possible to install dns and nis server in same solaris box .
could any one guide me how to setup the DNS server and how to configure
Thanks
SolarisTeam

Hi
Thanks for the reply,
It is working fine with the upgraded version of Weblogic 9.0 from weblogic 8.1. But not with the fresh installation of Weblogic 9.0.
Thanks,
Raj

SOLARIS 2.5.1 = Bind Version??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for