Solaris 8 container: S40_setup_preload failed

Dear all,
I got this error message during the postprocessing phase:
[Thu Oct 29 12:13:48 CET 2009] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S36_fix_pam_conf
[Thu Oct 29 12:13:48 CET 2009] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S40_setup_preload
crle: /var/ld/64/ld.config: open failed: No such file or directory
[Thu Oct 29 12:13:49 CET 2009] Postprocess: ERROR: p2v module S40_setup_preload failed: 0
[Thu Oct 29 12:13:49 CET 2009] Postprocess: Halting zone
[Thu Oct 29 12:13:50 CET 2009] Postprocess: ERROR: Postprocessing failed.
[Thu Oct 29 12:13:50 CET 2009] Result: Postprocessing failed.
[Thu Oct 29 12:13:50 CET 2009]
[Thu Oct 29 12:13:50 CET 2009] Result: *** Installation FAILED ***
Indeed there is no /var/ld/64ld.config file in the global zone.
Any idea what's wrong here?
Rainer

1. I'm using Solaris 10 10/08
2. yes, no probles during sol8 container installation
3.flar archive is used, creation without any errors
4.here is the S40_setup_preload script:
# Tell ld.so.1(1) to LD_PRELOAD the s8_preload library.
# The crle must be done within the running zone due to differences in the
# format of ld.config between S8 and S10 and beyond.
# As part of the p2v module interface there are environment variables set for
# this script (e.g. FILEDIR - path to brand-specific file repository).
# See the p2v script for a full list of variables.
S8_PRELOAD=/.SUNWnative/usr/lib/brand/solaris8/s8_preload.so.1
S864_PRELOAD=/.SUNWnative/usr/lib/brand/solaris8/64/s8_preload.so.1
# We have to add the s8_preload library to the secure path or commands
# that run with setuid privileges (e.g. a shell via "su" from a normal user)
# will not be allowed to access the library.
SECURE_DEST=/usr/lib/secure/s8_preload.so.1
SECURE64_DEST=/usr/lib/secure/64/s8_preload.so.1
tag="pre_p2v"
if [ -f $S8_PRELOAD ]; then
if [ ! -h $SECURE_DEST ]; then
if [ -f /var/ld/ld.config -a ! -f /var/ld/ld.config.$tag ]; then
cp -p /var/ld/ld.config /var/ld/ld.config.$tag
fi
ln -s $S8_PRELOAD $SECURE_DEST || exit 1
fi
crle -c /var/ld/ld.config -u -E LD_PRELOAD=$SECURE_DEST || exit 1
fi
if [ -f $S864_PRELOAD ]; then
if [ ! -h $SECURE64_DEST ]; then
if [ -f /var/ld/64/ld.config -a \
! -f /var/ld/64/ld.config.$tag ]; then
cp -p /var/ld/64/ld.config /var/ld/64/ld.config.$tag
fi
ln -s $S864_PRELOAD $SECURE64_DEST || exit 1
fi
crle -64 -c /var/ld/64/ld.config -u -E LD_PRELOAD=$SECURE64_DEST ||
exit 1
fi
We have many Solaris 10 systems here but there is no /var/ld/64/ld.config file there only the empty
/var/ld/64 Dir exists. I don't know what's the reason why the post install script is using the S40_setup_preload.
Rainer

Similar Messages

  • ERROR: p2v module S40_setup_preload failed: 0

    Hi,
    I get "ERROR: p2v module S40_setup_preload failed: 0" during installation of Solaris 8 zone. However, system seems to be running. After zlogin, /var/adm/utmpx was missing.
    [NOTICE: Zone rebooting]
    SunOS Release 5.8 Version Generic_Virtual 64-bit
    Copyright 1983-2000 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved
    Hostname: dgnws02
    INIT: Cannot create /var/adm/utmpx
    INIT: failed write of utmpx entry:" "
    INIT: failed write of utmpx entry:" "
    INIT: SINGLE USER MODE
    Type control-d to proceed with normal startup,
    (or give root password for system maintenance):
    Appreciate any suggestions on the possible cause of the problem. Thanks!
    # more s8-zone.install.826.log
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:54:33 AM SGT] Log File: /var/tmp/s8-zone.install.826.log
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:54:33 AM SGT] Product: Solaris 8 Containers 1.0
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:54:33 AM SGT] Installer: solaris8 brand installer 1.2
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:54:33 AM SGT] Zone: s8-zone
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:54:33 AM SGT] Path: /export/home/s8-zone
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:54:33 AM SGT] Starting pre-installation tasks.
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:54:33 AM SGT] Installation started for zone "s8-zone"
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:54:33 AM SGT] Source: /export/home/ssc/s8-system.flar
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:54:33 AM SGT] Media Type: flash archive
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:54:34 AM SGT] Installing: This may take several minutes...
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:54:34 AM SGT] cd /export/home/s8-zone/root &&
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:54:34 AM SGT] do_flar < "
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:59:47 AM SGT] Postprocessing: This may take several minutes...
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:59:47 AM SGT] running: p2v -v -u s8-zone
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:59:47 AM SGT] Postprocess: Gathering information about zone s8-zone
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:59:48 AM SGT] Postprocess: Creating mount points
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:59:48 AM SGT] Postprocess: Processing /etc/system
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:59:48 AM SGT] Postprocess: Booting zone to single user mode
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:00:06 PM SGT] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S20_apply_patches
    [Wed Feb 17 12:00:06 SGT 2010] S20_apply_patches: Unpacking patch: 109147-44
    [Wed Feb 17 12:00:07 SGT 2010] S20_apply_patches: Installing patch: 109147-44
    Checking installed patches...
    One or more patch packages included in
    109147-44 are not installed on this system.
    Patchadd is terminating.
    [Wed Feb 17 12:00:10 SGT 2010] S20_apply_patches: Unpacking patch: 111023-03
    [Wed Feb 17 12:00:10 SGT 2010] S20_apply_patches: Installing patch: 111023-03
    Checking installed patches...
    One or more patch packages included in
    111023-03 are not installed on this system.
    Patchadd is terminating.
    [Wed Feb 17 12:00:11 SGT 2010] S20_apply_patches: Unpacking patch: 111431-01
    [Wed Feb 17 12:00:11 SGT 2010] S20_apply_patches: Installing patch: 111431-01
    Checking installed patches...
    One or more patch packages included in
    111431-01 are not installed on this system.
    Patchadd is terminating.
    [Wed Feb 17 12:00:13 SGT 2010] S20_apply_patches: Unpacking patch: 112605-04
    [Wed Feb 17 12:00:13 SGT 2010] S20_apply_patches: Installing patch: 112605-04
    Checking installed patches...
    One or more patch packages included in
    112605-04 are not installed on this system.
    Patchadd is terminating.
    [Wed Feb 17 12:00:14 SGT 2010] S20_apply_patches: Unpacking patch: 112050-04
    [Wed Feb 17 12:00:14 SGT 2010] S20_apply_patches: Installing patch: 112050-04
    Checking installed patches...
    One or more patch packages included in
    112050-04 are not installed on this system.
    Patchadd is terminating.
    [Wed Feb 17 12:00:15 SGT 2010] S20_apply_patches: Unpacking patch: 109221-01
    [Wed Feb 17 12:00:16 SGT 2010] S20_apply_patches: Installing patch: 109221-01
    Checking installed patches...
    One or more patch packages included in
    109221-01 are not installed on this system.
    Patchadd is terminating.
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:00:16 PM SGT] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S31_fix_net
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:00:17 PM SGT] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S32_fix_nfs
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:00:17 PM SGT] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S33_fix_vfstab
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:00:17 PM SGT] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S34_fix_inittab
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:00:17 PM SGT] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S35_fix_crontab
    nawk: can't open file /var/spool/cron/crontabs/root
    source line number 18
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:00:17 PM SGT] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S36_fix_pam_conf
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:00:18 PM SGT] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S40_setup_preload
    crle: illegal option -- E
    usage: crle [-64] [-a name ] [-c conf] [-f flags] [-i name] [-I name ]
    [-g name] [-G name] [-l dir] [-o dir ] [-s dir] [-t ELF|AOUT] [-u] [-v]
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:00:18 PM SGT] Postprocess: ERROR: p2v module S40_setup_preload failed: 0
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:00:18 PM SGT] Postprocess: ERROR: Postprocessing failed.
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:00:18 PM SGT] Result: Postprocessing failed.
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:00:18 PM SGT]
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:00:18 PM SGT] Result: *** Installation FAILED ***
    [Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:00:18 PM SGT] Log File: /var/tmp/s8-zone.install.826.log

    Thank-you very much! Michael!
    I have checked the crle binary, and the details are as follows. Is there a Solaris 10 patch that I am missing?
    I have installed Solaris 10 Recommended patch cluster dated December 2009. The patches installed are listed below.
    Really appreciate your help!
    # find . -name crle
    # pwd
    /usr/lib
    # cd /
    # find . -name crle
    ./usr/bin/crle
    ./export/home/10_Recommended/patches/120011-14/SUNWcsu/reloc/usr/bin/crle
    ./export/home/10_Recommended/patches/139555-08/SUNWcsu/reloc/usr/bin/crle
    ./export/home/10_Recommended/patches/118833-36/SUNWcsu/reloc/usr/bin/crle
    ./export/home/10_Recommended/patches/141444-09/SUNWcsu/reloc/usr/bin/crle
    ./export/home/10_Recommended/patches/127127-11/SUNWcsu/reloc/usr/bin/crle
    ./export/home/127127-11/SUNWcsu/reloc/usr/bin/crle
    ./export/home/s8-zone/root/usr/bin/crle
    ./export/home/s8-zone/root/.SUNWnative/usr/bin/crle
    # echo $PATH
    /usr/sbin:/usr/bin
    # cd /usr/bin
    # ls -l crle
    -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 44612 Sep 16 04:20 crle

  • Cannot install Solaris 8 Container

    Hello,
    I'm trying to restore a Solaris 8 container using a flar archive onto a ZFS filesystem. allthough i've done this before succesfully a now encouter the following error.
    [Mon May  3 10:38:06 CEST 2010] Log File: /var/tmp/chili.install.3496.log
    [Mon May  3 10:38:06 CEST 2010] Product: Solaris 8 Containers 1.0
    [Mon May  3 10:38:06 CEST 2010] Installer: solaris8 brand installer 1.22
    [Mon May  3 10:38:06 CEST 2010] Zone: chili
    [Mon May  3 10:38:06 CEST 2010] Path: /zones/chili
    [Mon May  3 10:38:06 CEST 2010] Starting pre-installation tasks.
    [Mon May  3 10:38:06 CEST 2010] Installation started for zone "chili"
    [Mon May  3 10:38:06 CEST 2010] Source: /mnt/flar/chili-restored.flar
    [Mon May  3 10:38:06 CEST 2010] Media Type: flash archive
    [Mon May  3 10:38:06 CEST 2010] Installing: This may take several minutes...
    [Mon May  3 10:38:06 CEST 2010] cd /zones/chili/root &&
    [Mon May  3 10:38:06 CEST 2010] do_flar < "/mnt/flar/chili-restored.flar"
    [Mon May  3 10:50:22 CEST 2010] Postprocessing: This may take several minutes...
    [Mon May  3 10:50:22 CEST 2010] running: p2v chili
    [Mon May  3 10:50:22 CEST 2010] Postprocess: Gathering information about zone chili
    [Mon May  3 10:50:22 CEST 2010] Postprocess: Creating mount points
    touch: /zones/chili/root/etc/mnttab cannot create
    chmod: WARNING: can't access /zones/chili/root/etc/mnttab
    [Mon May  3 10:50:22 CEST 2010] Postprocess: Processing /etc/system
    /usr/lib/brand/solaris8/s8_p2v[312]: /zones/chili/root/etc/system: cannot open
    [Mon May  3 10:50:22 CEST 2010] Result: Postprocessing failed.
    [Mon May  3 10:50:22 CEST 2010]
    [Mon May  3 10:50:22 CEST 2010] Result: *** Installation FAILED ***
    [Mon May  3 10:50:22 CEST 2010] Log File: /var/tmp/chili.install.3496.log
    I've done chmod -R 700 /zones/chili but it wont let me install the flar image.
    manually i'm able to create files and directories in /zone/chili
    suggestions are appriciated.
    regards,

    It might be connected to the ZFS configuration.
    When installing the zone / fills up. After removing some files i had enough room to install the zone.
    after installing the zone i logged in and created a 1gb file. a df some a increase in used space on /
    my storage pool is on c5t1d0s2
    zfs pool look like this;
    [root@lapland] zones $ zfs list
    NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
    storage-lapland 74.7G 71.9G 21K legacy
    storage-lapland/chili 9.12G 71.9G 9.08G /zones/chili
    storage-lapland/chili@20100428 0 - 9.08G -
    storage-lapland/chili/restored 36.6M 71.9G 9.08G /mnt/restore
    storage-lapland/noo-noo 52.2G 71.9G 51.5G /zones/noo-noo
    storage-lapland/noo-noo@20100428 647M - 51.5G -
    storage-lapland/polen_1179 4.80G 71.9G 4.80G /zones/polen
    storage-lapland/restore 8.66G 71.9G 8.66G /mnt/flar

  • Solaris 8 container error

    During the Installation of the solaris 8 zone I get this message. Anyone familiar with this?
    [Fri Feb  6 09:11:16 CST 2009] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S33_fix_vfstab
    [Fri Feb  6 09:11:17 CST 2009] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S34_fix_inittab
    [Fri Feb  6 09:11:17 CST 2009] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S35_fix_crontab
    [Fri Feb  6 09:11:17 CST 2009] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S36_fix_pam_conf
    [Fri Feb  6 09:11:17 CST 2009] Postprocess: Applying p2v module S40_setup_preload
    ln: cannot create /usr/lib/secure/64/s8_preload.so.1: No such file or directory
    [Fri Feb  6 09:11:17 CST 2009] Postprocess: ERROR: p2v module S40_setup_preload failed: 0
    [Fri Feb  6 09:11:17 CST 2009] Postprocess: ERROR: Postprocessing failed.
    [Fri Feb  6 09:11:17 CST 2009] Result: Postprocessing failed.
    [Fri Feb  6 09:11:17 CST 2009]
    [Fri Feb  6 09:11:17 CST 2009] Result: *** Installation FAILED ***

    during netboot for jumpstart installation bpgetfile-call fails because it uses wrong netmask
    Senthilkumar

  • Solaris 8 in a Solaris 10 Container

    Dear all,
    we came upon the question whether it's possible to run Solaris 8 in a Solaris 10 container. Hereby, the idea is to be able to use Solaris 10 with its great ability of server virtualisation but also to use a Oracle 8i certified operating system at the same time.
    Any ideas?
    Greetings
    /Marc

    Ok, that was exactly my first impression. Anyway, i
    came to know that there's a project about running
    FreeBSD in a Solaris 10 Container. How does this work
    if there's just a single (so shared) kernel? Can't
    image a FreeBSD system running a Solaris kernel.Here's a quote from a Sun blog on the project:
    An example of what I mean is ZoneBSD, an opensource initiative with as goal "will be to factor as much Solaris code as necessary into FreeBSD in order to support running a FreeBSD container within a Solaris 10 Zone", really cool stuff... or as they say around here "Sweeet".
    (I can no longer find any current link to the project).
    So yes, it appears to have been quite an ambitious project involving merging kernel bits. Not something that's going to help you do anything with Oracle on Solaris 10 GA.
    Darren

  • Reinstall zones (solaris 8 container)

    Hi
    I have to restore 2 zones, because originally the zones are stored on a ZFS filesystem i've did the backup with the zfsdump scripts.
    I'm able to restore the ZFS filesystems but that leaves me with the problem of reconfiguring the zones.
    how do i configure and reinstall these zones?, the original flash archive used to setup these zones is missing.
    would it be possible to use the following procedure
    1) restore the zfs filesystemen
    2) clone the latest snapshot and mount it.
    3) create an archive from the mounted snapshot to use as the install media for the zone
    the second option i can think of is
    1 ) create a standard solaris 8 zone with the solaris 8 image you can download from Sun
    2) Copy the files from the mounted clone to the new zone
    3) boot the zone
    I'm hoping someone could guide me in the right direction
    Regards,

    I just managed to restore a zfs filesystem with a solaris 8 container on it using the steps below.
    I'm curious if i got it right or if there is another more obvious way as i have only a little experience and hands on time with the zfs filesystem.
    bash-3.00# zfsrestored.sh -z storage/z-chili
    storage/z-chili is restored from /nsr/storage_z-chili.20081206.
    bash-3.00#
    bash-3.00# zfs clone storage/z-chili@20081206 storage/z-chili/restored
    bash-3.00# zfs list
    NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
    storage 85.9G 48.0G 24.5K legacy
    storage/data 69.7G 48.0G 69.7G /data
    storage/z-chili 7.61G 48.0G 7.61G legacy
    storage/z-chili@20081206 0 - 7.61G -
    storage/z-chili/restored 0 48.0G 7.61G legacy
    storage/z-polen 4.26G 48.0G 4.26G legacy
    storage/z-polen@20081211 832K - 4.26G -
    storage/zones 4.32G 48.0G 4.32G /export/zones/
    bash-3.00#
    zfs set mountpoint=/mnt/restore storage/z-chili/restored
    bash-3.00# zfs list
    NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
    storage 85.9G 48.0G 24.5K legacy
    storage/data 69.7G 48.0G 69.7G /data
    storage/z-chili 7.61G 48.0G 7.61G legacy
    storage/z-chili@20081206 0 - 7.61G -
    storage/z-chili/restored 0 48.0G 7.61G /mnt/restore
    storage/z-polen 4.26G 48.0G 4.26G legacy
    storage/z-polen@20081211 832K - 4.26G -
    storage/zones 4.32G 48.0G 4.32G /export/zones/
    bash-3.00# flar create -n zchili -R /mnt/restore/root/ /data/z-chili-restored.flar
    Full Flash
    Checking integrity...
    Integrity OK.
    Running precreation scripts...
    Precreation scripts done.
    Determining the size of the archive...
    and i've used the flar image to install the zone.
    apart from some file/dir permission rights this worked and i got the zone and webservers up and running.

  • Solaris 8 Container

    Does anyone know where I can download the Solaris 8 Container template or is it licensed?

    i didnt however i wasnt hammering it. if the load was expected to be high i would have done the io layout diff (try and follow some of oracles ideas: SAME for one, if possible).
    some depends on the load and the load from the other zones. you can use allocate resource limits to give more priority to more important zones or make sure you have enough resources to start. what type of load are you expecting?

  • Sunwj3rtx JDK 1.4.2 64 bit for Solaris 10 Container

    Hi,
    does anybody know where I ca get the sunwj3rtx and similar other Solaris 10 packages for the x86 / 64 bit platform. I need the EOL Java 1.4 because I want to install a SAP application and these applications accept only the jdk 1.4.2. Maybe there is a 64bit installer version, which would be fine too. The downloadable version from java.sun.com is only 32bit which doesnt work.
    Any hints are welcome.
    Regards
    Martin

    Hi Richard,
    I found the link after reading the install guide of SAP more exactly. There are several SAP hint numbers and in one of them there was the information about the jdk link.
    In our company we already had so many problems because SAP didn't upgrade to the actual jdk. Keep in mind that the jdk 1.4 is already out of livetime for time. Next year the jdk 5 will go out of livetime and the actual jdk 6 is going to be replaced by the new jdk 7.
    I guess SAP doesn't work with test suites so that they easily can switch to a new jdk release. With a test suite they could see all failures coming up after the jdk switch, and they should be easily fixable, if there are any.
    Many software frameworks doesn't support older jdk's anymore, at least those which are out of lifetime. Therefore I wrote some kind of wrapper on the java stack in the NW4s so that I can use jdk6 inside the java stack. It's a bit tricky and not yet for general public use but for my own needs it is a work around this jdk 1.4 problem.
    So coming back to your jdk question: I installed jdk 1.4 in my solaris 10 container as an addition. In the newest Solaris version there is already jdk 6 included, which I use for all non sap applications.
    Good luck with your nw4s.
    Cheers
    Martin

  • Solaris 9 container

    anyone tell me how can i install solaris 9 container on solaris 10, also give me a details a bout solaris 9 container (information), and what is the rquirments needed to run solaris 9 containers in solaris 10.
    Thnks in advnc,
    Basem

    get it --> [http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/containers/getit.jsp|http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/containers/getit.jsp]
    doc --> [http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-4490|http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-4490]

  • EBS running on Solaris 8 container (on a Solaris 10 box)

    As per doc ID 567849.1, Oracle has started supporting Oracle 8 containers. The doc mostly talks about Oracle Server Enterprise edition and not about FND/AOL
    Has anyone every installed E-Business Suite on a Solaris 8 container and experienced any issues?

    Hi;
    Please check below thread
    Sun Solaris 10 containers
    Sun Solaris 10 containers
    Hope it helps
    Regard
    Helios

  • Solaris 8 container install problem using Ultra 60 flash archive

    Hi
    I have an M4000 configured with a Solaris 8 container.
    I am using a flash archive from an Ultra 60.
    Below is the problem when I install.
    # zoneadm -z f714clone install -u -a /var/flar/fid714_20090515.flar
    Log File: /var/tmp/f714clone.install.26921.log
    Source: /var/flar/fid714_20090515.flar
    Installing: This may take several minutes...
    Postprocessing: This may take several minutes...
    WARNING: zone did not finish booting.
    Last entry in the logfile is...
    [Fri May 15 12:21:22 BST 2009] Postprocess: Performing zone sys-unconfig
    It just sits at the WARNING doing nothing.
    I connected to the container console using "zlogin -C f714clone" but this just gives me a blank screen with no output and unable to do anything.
    I used a different archive from a V120 and had no problems.
    Is there something I need to configure for a Ultra 60.
    Thanks in advance.
    Steve.

    I got this to work. It seems, for whatever reason, that it doesn't like the '-u' flag for an Ultra 60. I installed using '-p' instead and it was fine, it even came up with the new IP I had assinged.
    zoneadm -z QeSun01b install -p -a qesun01.flar

  • Application running in Solaris 9 container generating core files. what to do?

    My solaris 9 zone configuration in solaris 10 looks like:
    zonecfg:sms> info
    zonename: sms
    zonepath: /zone/sms
    brand: solaris9
    autoboot: true
    bootargs:
    pool:
    limitpriv: default,proc_priocntl,proc_clock_highres,proc_lock_memory,sys_time,priv_proc_priocntl,priv_sys_time,net_rawaccess,sys_ipc_config,priv_proc_lock_memory
    scheduling-class:
    ip-type: exclusive
    hostid:
    [max-shm-memory: 4G]
    [max-shm-ids: 100]
    [max-sem-ids: 100]
    fs:
      dir: /var
      special: /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s5
      raw: /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s5
      type: ufs
      options: []
    net:
      address not specified
      physical: bge0
      defrouter not specified
    device
      match: /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s5
    device
      match: /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s5
    device
      match: /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s6
    device
      match: /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s6
    device
      match: /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s7
    device
      match: /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s7
    capped-cpu:
      [ncpus: 2.00]
    capped-memory:
      physical: 4G
      [swap: 8G]
      [locked: 2G]
    attr:
      name: hostid
      type: string
      value: 84b18f64
    attr:
      name: machine
      type: string
      value: sun4u
    rctl:
      name: zone.max-sem-ids
      value: (priv=privileged,limit=100,action=deny)
    rctl:
      name: zone.max-shm-ids
      value: (priv=privileged,limit=100,action=deny)
    rctl:
      name: zone.max-shm-memory
      value: (priv=privileged,limit=4294967296,action=deny)
    rctl:
      name: zone.max-swap
      value: (priv=privileged,limit=8589934592,action=deny)
    rctl:
      name: zone.max-locked-memory
      value: (priv=privileged,limit=2147483648,action=deny)
    rctl:
      name: zone.cpu-cap
      value: (priv=privileged,limit=200,action=deny)
    Solaris 9 zone /etc/system file looks like:
    * The directive below is not applicable in the virtualized environment.
    * The directive below is not applicable in the virtualized environment.
    * The directive below is not applicable in the virtualized environment.
    * The directive below is not applicable in the virtualized environment.
    * The directive below is not applicable in the virtualized environment.
    * The directive below is not applicable in the virtualized environment.
    set noexec_user_stack=1
    set semsys:seminfo_semmni=100
    set semsys:seminfo_semmns=1024
    set semsys:seminfo_semmsl=256
    set semsys:seminfo_semvmx=32767
    set shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=4294967295
    set shmsys:shminfo_shmmin=1
    set shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=100
    set shmsys:shminfo_shmseg=10
    set rlim_fd_max=65536
    set rlim_fd_cur=60000
    * The directive below is not applicable in the virtualized environment.
    My questions are:
    1. Application running in solaris 9 container generating core files. what to do???
    2. My prstat -Z for zone shows almost 95% percent cpu usage. what to do???
    3. Kindly can share how to move solaris 9 into solaris 10 containers ??

    Based on the new questions for the same post you wrote in the other communities, some posts are removed as duplicate, here is the answer :
    For the point #3, please look on table 17-1 in the following URL :
    Zone Components - System Administration Guide: Oracle Solaris Containers-Resource Management and Oracle Solaris Zones
    You can also customize your container /etc/system file but it cannot exceeds the global zone and the zone configuration value.
    For the other point, #2, this can be complicated without a complete image of what the complete system do.
    Try fist to check if you have not a busy process in your zone, then you can check if a bottleneck exists in the I/O side. You use maybe wrong parameters, a wrong configuration or your system configuration is insufficient in term of resources.
    What I can see in the outputs that you provided is that the S9 zone uses the half of the swap space. This can impact your zone performance and I/O activity, and can have in this case a side effect on some processes. Check why your zone uses the swap and how you can remedy this.

  • Solaris 9 container : projects?

    All,
    I created a Solaris 9 container for some DB testing.
    I've never actually used projects previously (on both Solaris 9 and 10) and now I'd like to try to use it because I like that you can use rcapstat to see the memory utilization per project. But in order for rcapstat to be useful, I would have to create projects first (correct me if I'm wrong here? It would be great if I dont have to create projects in order to use rcapstat), something like this :
    projadd -p 111 -G hkk -c "Oracle Project Test" -K "rcap.max-rss=10MB" -K "process.max-file-size=(priv,50MB,deny)" -K "task.max-lwps=(priv,100,deny)" oraproj
    However, when i ran this command on my Solaris 9 container, I got the following error :
    Unknown option: K
    Usage: projadd [-c comment] [-U user[,user ...]] [-G group[,group ...]]
    [-p projid [-o]] project
    So it looks like I cant assign a memory cap using project this way on Solaris 9?
    I hope someone can point me to the right direction how to do this. I did set the add capped-memory using zonecfg but this isnt useful for the rcapstat command since it seems to be only checking projects...
    Thanks!

    No reply from anybody?
    Sheesh.......just an honest observation here : I'm been using technical forums for awhile and Oracle SUN ones I have to say are the worst with feedbacks. Symantec forums for example you have real Symantec engineers helping with solutions or at least giving pointers. I wish we have the same here....

  • NODEAPPS FAILURE FOR IPMP ON SOLARIS LOCAL CONTAINER

    Hi everyone,
    I want to setup an two node RAC (oracle 11.2.0.2) in a Solaris container 3.3.
    though it was certified recently I am facing issues while running the root.sh in node 1 and node 2.
    /u01/app/11.2.0/grid/bin/srvctl start nodeapps -n cbq2-svu-istdb-n1 ... failed
    FirstNode configuration failed at /u01/app/11.2.0/grid/crs/install/crsconfig_lib.pm line 8388.
    /u01/app/11.2.0/grid/perl/bin/perl -I/u01/app/11.2.0/grid/perl/lib -I/u01/app/11.2.0/grid/crs/install /u01/app/11.2.0/grid/crs/install/rootcrs.pl execution failed
    Can you please help me out to fix it
    FYI
    My cluvfy precheck was successfull
    ./runcluvfy.sh stage -pre crsinst -n cbq2-svu-istdb-n1,cbq2-svu-istdb-n2 -verbose
    Pre-check for cluster services setup was successful.
    Thanks
    Surendran

    Thanks for the notice, been waiting for that one!

  • Solaris 10 live upgrade failed

    I am trying to upgrade Solaris 10 U6 10/08 to U7 05/09 with live upgrade. But it failed with following errors:
    # luupgrade -u -n solaris_u7 -s /mnt/cdrom
    No entry for BE <solaris_u7> in GRUB menu
    Copying failsafe kernel from media.
    Uncompressing miniroot
    Creating miniroot device
    miniroot filesystem is <ufs>
    Mounting miniroot at </mnt/cdrom/Solaris_10/Tools/Boot>
    Validating the contents of the media </mnt/cdrom>.
    The media is a standard Solaris media.
    The media contains an operating system upgrade image.
    The media contains <Solaris> version <10>.
    Constructing upgrade profile to use.
    Locating the operating system upgrade program.
    Checking for existence of previously scheduled Live Upgrade requests.
    Creating upgrade profile for BE <solaris_u7>.
    Checking for GRUB menu on ABE <solaris_u7>.
    Saving GRUB menu on ABE <solaris_u7>.
    Checking for x86 boot partition on ABE.
    Determining packages to install or upgrade for BE <solaris_u7>.
    Performing the operating system upgrade of the BE <solaris_u7>.
    CAUTION: Interrupting this process may leave the boot environment unstable
    or unbootable.
    ERROR: Installation of the packages from this media of the media failed; pfinstall returned these diagnostics:
    Processing profile
    Loading local environment and services
    Generating upgrade actions
    WARNING: SUNWwgetu depends on SUNWgcmn, which is not selected
    WARNING: SUNWi15cs depends on SUNWi15rf, which is not selected
    WARNING: SUNWi1cs depends on SUNWxwplt, which is not selected
    WARNING: SUNWbind depends on SUNWbindr, which is not selected
    WARNING: SUNWale depends on SUNWxwrtl, which is not selected
    WARNING: SUNWale depends on SUNWxwplt, which is not selected
    ERROR: No upgradeable file systems found at specified mount point.
    Restoring GRUB menu on ABE <solaris_u7>.
    ABE boot partition backing deleted.
    PBE GRUB has no capability information.
    PBE GRUB has no versioning information.
    ABE GRUB is newer than PBE GRUB. Updating GRUB.
    GRUB update was successfull.
    Did it really fail due to file dependencies? Will it fix the problem by installing the missing packages on the running BE?

    You need to run this script from the CD or Install server: Solaris_10/Tools/Installers/liveupgrade20 when upgrading to 10 u7. I had run into this. Run the script and choose all the defaults. Liveupgrade will then not give the errors you have seen.
    Linuxbass :-)

Maybe you are looking for

  • PreparedStatement not working

    Hi, I am having some problem using PreparedStatement.executeUpdate() . I want to be able to prepare several queries before commiting and I wrote this just to test it PreparedStatement stmt= aConnection.prepareStatement("update trans_test1 set field1=

  • Rtf template not showing as uploaded in concurrent program

    Hello I have created xml data definition and uploaded a rtf template. Then linked it to my concurrent program. But when i ran the concurrent program successfully all i get is the xml output. Upon closer inspection it shows that no template is uploade

  • JavaScript:  Help with IF Statement

    I am not familar with Java and I have been fighting with this IF statement and I cannot get it to work.  I am sure it is something fairly basic.  Can anyone help?  I have seeminly tried everything.  In this example below I am trying to check if the d

  • IPhone 5 No Service Issue

    I posted this in the ATT forums but haven't heard back.  Thought I would give it a shot here. Short story – has anyone with an iPhone 5 had "No Service" issues with ATT and been able to fix it? Long story – A couple of months ago they upgraded the to

  • Javascript doesnt display correctly in Safari 1.3.2

    I'm a fledgling web designer, and developed a site for an artist. An associate of mine provided me with a php script for a thumbnail viewer, with a scrollbar on the left for viewing the thumbnails -- when you click on a tn, the image appears larger i