Solaris 9 and RAID systems
hello!
i'm having problem with my solaris 9 can somebody pls help me.
actually I have this raid subsystems attached to my sun blade 1500 machine through an fiber channel hba from emulex...when I try to check the disk on my raid ( I have set multiple luns on my raid), it seems solaris 9 cant recognize them all. only lun0 was recognize... i already installed the driver ( version 6.01f) coming from emulex for solaris os... I counter-checked this problem to solaris 10...still the same...what shall I do?
I already have that:
name="sd" class="scsi" class_prop="atapi"
target=0 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi" class_prop="atapi"
target=1 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi" class_prop="atapi"
target=2 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi" class_prop="atapi"
target=3 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
target=4 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
target=5 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
target=6 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
target=8 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
target=9 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
target=10 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
target=11 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
target=12 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
target=13 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
target=14 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
target=15 lun=0;
I also have this:
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=0;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=1;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=2;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=3;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=4;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=5;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=6;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=7;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=8;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=9;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=10;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=11;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=12;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=13;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=14;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=15;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=16;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=17;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=18;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=19;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=20;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=21;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=22;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=23;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=24;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=25;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=26;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=27;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=28;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=29;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=30;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=31;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=32;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=33;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=34;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=35;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=36;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=37;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=38;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=39;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=40;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=41;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=42;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=43;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=44;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=45;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=46;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=47;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=48;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=49;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=50;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=51;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=52;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=53;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=54;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=55;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=56;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=57;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=58;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=59;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=60;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=61;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=62;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=63;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=17 lun=0;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=17 lun=1;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=17 lun=2;
what does solaris 9 uses as a target id? in solaris 8 i have no problem...my sd.conf in sol8 is also the same...
Similar Messages
-
Problem with fibre channel card and raid system after upgrading to 10.4.7
Hello, I have a problem with our Xserve G4 DP. After the installation of 10.4.7 everything works fine exept our fibre channel card. This card is connected to a Hitachi Raid System which worked fine over a year. But after the update the volume was no longer mounted. I even reinstalled the server to 10.4.4 and no sign of our raid volume. Using the apple fibre channel utiltiy 2.0, I see that there is a connection - but still the raid volume is not mounted. When I restart the server the lights on the back of the card are shortly flickering and sending some packets to the raid system but that´s all. Has anybody an idea?
Greetings from Heidelberg
Klaus
Xserve G4 DP 1 GHz Mac OS X (10.4.6) Mac OSX Server 10.4.7You could re-update, by downloading the 10.4.7 Combination Updater from Apple.
-
Solaris10 on V240 and RAID System Transtec Provigo 410
Hi,
does anybody have a clue how i can install the external raidsystem Provigo 410 from transtec into solaris 10?
I connected it via fc and iscsi with a V240 and get the messages in the format :
FC:
1. c3t230000A0D1E171F8d0 <drive type unknown>
/pci@1f,700000/pci@0/fibre-channel@2/fp@0,0/ssd@w230000a0d1e171f8,0
ISCSI:
1. c3t6d0 <drive type unknown>
/iscsi/[email protected]%3A01.00a0d1e1720604D2,2
The controller of this raid is a Rasiliant, Typ RAS-6000.
The raid runs perfect with Win2k3 and linux and the vendor told me to ask Sun to get it started ...
Can anyone please please help me?Hmm.
no need to search anymore. Verndor told me, that Solaris 10 is not supported with this raid ... shame on them :-) -
I have recently started a solaris. I have a solaris using 64x and 86x systems and have java. The machine is very active and is very quick. I am happy so far with its performance and think its worthwhile to continue with my projects. That's all I have to say.
John LuptonI have recently started a solaris. I have a solaris using 64x and 86x systems and have java. The machine is very active and is very quick. I am happy so far with its performance and think its worthwhile to continue with my projects. That's all I have to say.
John Lupton -
System_Exec and Open System Command Pipe hangs in Solaris
I'm using LV 7.1.1 on Solaris and I'm having major problems with the System Exec function in combination with Open System Command Pipe.
1. The program has to run different stuff in parallel but the System Exec won't run in parallel with Open System Command Pipe. It immediately hangs and neither function ever returns. LabVIEW must be killed.
2. After executing Open System Command Pipe, stopping the program and then executing a System Exec, that too hangs. The external script called by Open System Command Pipe is no longer running but obviously LV leaves something behind anyway. Close Pipe doesn't seem to clean up everything. Again, LabVIEW must be killed.
3. Also, regardless of any System Exec call, the first time Open System Command Pipe and Read Pipe is executed it takes a very long time to get the result. After stopping the program and restarting it, it's much faster.
Has anyone else experienced these problems?I'm having the same difficulties... tried many things, with no luck...
-
HI All,
I've connected two servers, each a different controller, to one LUN of a raid system. All the raid disks (except the spare) are put together inside 1 LUN.
Now I think I remember that this is not a good idea. Can someone explain to me why this is bad (or not) ?
Thanks in advance
LucaLook for clustering on the forum or rather scsi-initiator-id.
-
X4500 Thumper and RAID configuration
Hi,
Scenario:
Suppose I have an X4500 running with Solaris and ZFS . I configured RAID5 configuration with the ZFS tools. The RAID is working fine, but after x months/years I need to make a new Solaris installation from scratch on the X4500 machine.
Will my ZFS data located in the RAID be in danger?
In a hardware based RAID, the meta-data for the RAID configuration and rebuilding it is done regardless of the OS running above it. It is done by the RAID controller.
However, in X4500 with Solaris+ZFS - the OS itself is managing the RAID configuration. So...? What will happen to the data if the OS fails or needs to be reinstalled?
Thanks,
Itay.By RAID5 I assume you mean RAID-Z which is the ZFS replacement for RAID-5. If you actually mean SVM RAID-5 with ZFS on top of that, I don't think there is a way to get the data. But with ZFS, the state is actually stored within the pool, so it is system-independent. If you intend to upgrade, first run zpool export, do the install, then do zpool import (it will scan your disks for any pools). If your system crashes, you should be able to do a zpool import -f (which will force import a non-exported zpool).
-
Controller LSI 1068E and raid 10
Hi all.
I 'd like to create a raid 10 with raidctl on a Blade 6320. I have 4 disks of 146Gb. After I jumpstarted the blade I did as follow:
# raidctl -C "(0.0.0 0.1.0)(0.2.0 0.3.0)" -r 10 0
Creating RAID volume will destroy all data on spare space of member disks, proceed (yes/no)? y
Operation not support with volume of this level.
Does anybody know if it's possible? Any clue/suggestions?
TIA
san2riniHardware
T5240
16 x 146GB SAS Disk (0 - 15)
Integrated LSI 1068E
Software
Solaris 10 Operating System 5/08 Media
Objective:
Task 1: To Create RAID 1 Array using 0 and 1 HDD for OS Volume
Task 2: To Create RAID 1E Array 2 ,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13 for Data Volume
Task 3: To Create Hot Spare For the Above Array Using 14 ,15 Disks
Operations Performed:
Task 1 To Create RAID 1 Array using 0 and 1 HDD and install Solaris OS Volume
Step 1+: In ok boot cdrom -s
Step 2+: In # raidctl -C "0.0.0 0.1.0" -r 1 1
Prompted for yes/no
typed yes
Volume created successfully
Task 2 To Create RAID 1E Array 2 ,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13 for Data Volume
Step 1+ In # raidctl -C "0.2.0 0.3.0 0.4.0 0.5.0 0.6.0 0.7.0 0.8.0 0.9.0 0.10.0 0.11.0 0.12.0 0.13.0" -r 1E 1
Prompted for yes/no
typed yes
Error occured while processing the above command
Configuring mpt .............. 0.2.0
done
Configuring mpt .............. 0.3.0
done
Configuring mpt .............. 0.3.0
done
|
|
|
|
Configuring mpt .............. 0.11.0
done
Configuring mpt .............. 0.12.0
done
Configuring mpt .............. 0.13.0
done
timeout error occurred
step 2 +# raidctl -S
0.2.0 device gone
0.3.0 device gone
|
|
|
|
0.13.0 device gone
above error found
step 3+
Os Installed and configured Sucessfully in RAID 1 VOLUME
step 4+
after getting in to the OS
in # raidctl -S shows
LSI 1068E
c1t0d0
0.0.0 GOOD
0.1.0 GOOD
0.14.0. GOOD
0.15.0 GOOD
disks 2 to 13 (12 disks Invisible) -
How to: make one or two partions at a raid system?
Hey
how can i make one or more a partions at a raid system?
i will make the partions at a 250gb raid. one with 120gb for the bootsector, and the other for documents, etc.
is there a hwo to anywhere? dont find one?
please read my second question.... 2 raids at one mac pro?
regaradsO.K., i was looking the hole day to get that partions on a raid working.
to make the partions on each HD with the same volume, this is no problem. when you then create the first raid, works fine. but when you make the second raid, you get a massage, that this raid is not found.
then you see both raids at the disc utilty, but only at the first you seen the volumen down under, by the second not. the first works, the second is not avabiele.
so, now i have only one big mirrowed raid for my boot sector, and its runs fast, quick and without big noise... thats what i want, and the second big raid for my files.
2 raids at one mac pro with 4 hd. one with 2 x 250 gb hd for the bootsector, and the other with 2 x 500gb for files
thx to all, and you kappy
regards -
Windows 7 on mac mini server and raid 1
I just purchased a 2011 mac mini server with the hopes of installing windows 7 alongside lion. Then my goal was to have the two drives mirrored. I successfully mirrored the two drives using disk utility and then proceeded to install lion. This all went fine. Imagine my shock when I loaded up bootcamp to see an error message describing it's inability to install windows on a raided system. The thought hadn't even occured to me that this would be an issue.
I have searched through various forums and other places on the internet and haven't found a solution. I am curious if I can get anyone with any experience in this area. Is it possible to have mac and windows installed on a drive... and have that drive mirrored to the second drive... regardless of what os i'm booted into?
Thanks for your help guysThe GUI version of Disk Utility is very limited in what sort of RAID configurations you can create. It will only allow you to have a single partition on the disk and to make a RAID using that.
Boot Camp requires creating additional partitions on the disk and hence it complaining.
There is a commandline version of Disk Utility called diskutility (duh!). It has far more options available. Details for this command can be obtained by typing man diskutility in Terminal.app.
It appears that in theory you might be able to do the following.
Start off with both disks not setup for RAID
Use Boot Camp to create the Windows partition. Repeat this on each disk.
Then in Terminal.app manually convert the boot Mac partition to a RAID using diskutil appleraid enable
Then add the matching partition on the second drive to make it a working mirror using diskutil appleraid add
Then in Terminal.app manually create a RAID for the Windows partition using both drives and use FAT32 as the format using diskutil appleraid create
Then boot and run the Windows installer and tell it to erase the Windows partition as NTFS
I cannot gurantee the above will work and you should obviously have backups if needed. Another option would be to have the Mac partition covered by RAID but not the Windows partition, this would result in three volumes one Mac RAIDed volume, and two other non RAIDed volumes even though you have two physical disks. -
Macbook Pro: How do I set up a RAID system?
Macbook Pro: How do I set up a RAID system on a MACBOOK PRO properly?
Can I have the OS on the same drives or does it need to be seperate?
I mostly want to do this becuase I am having a lot of problems with the "spinning ball of death" and slow speeds. I have my RAM maxed out at 6Gigs and my 7200rpm 750GB HD is about half full.
Am I correct in trying to do an external RAID Drive to help with speed?
If yes, what is the best way to do this and which type of connection (USB, Firewire, etc) is best to use?
Thanks!Edward House
Edward House
Am I correct in trying to do an external RAID Drive to help with speed?
No
Why is my computer slow? -
I have read through a lot of information on disk usage, storage rules for an editing rig, users inquiries/member responses in this forum and I thank each and every one of you – especially Harm.
In building my new workstation, I purchased five (5) WD 1T, 7k, 64M SATAIII hard drives and an Areca RAID card, ARC-1880ix-16-4G, which I plan to use primarily as my media/data disk array. The workstation will use a 128GB SATAIII SSD as the OS/program drive and I will transfer two (2) WD Raptor/10k SATA 70GB drives from my current system for pagefile/scratch/render use. I tentatively plan on using a mobo SATAIII port for the SSD and mobo SATA ports with a software RAID (level 0) for the 10k Raptors.
In reading the Areca Instruction manual, I am now considering exactly how I should configure the 5 physical 1TB drives in terms of RAID Level(s), Volume Sets, and RAID Sets. I must admit that I like the opportunity of allowing for a Dedicated Hot Spare as I am generally distrustful of the MTBF data that drive vendors tout and have the bad experience in the past of losing data from a mal-configured RAID array and a single drive hardware failure (admittedly, my fault!).
In line with the logic that one doesn’t want to perform disk reading while trying to write at the same time (or vice-versa), I am thinking the approach above should work OK in using the mobo disk interface and both software and external hardware RAID controllers without having to create separate RAID level configurations within a Volume Set or further dividing up the physical drives into separate RAID sets. I know in forum messages that Harm noted that he had 17 drives and I could envision a benefit to having separate RAID sets in that situation, but I am not at that point yet.
To some degree I think it might be best to just create one RAID Level on one Volume Set on one RAID Set, but want to solicit thoughts from veteran controller users on their workflows/thoughts in these regards.
Anyone care to share thoughts/perspectives? Thanks
BillThanks for the speedy feedback Harm - I appreciate it.
I was thinking RAID level 3 as well.
Of course, it's always something! I purchased the Caviar Blacks by mistake - which are non-TLER. I will work with EggHead to return the ones I purchased and replace them with RE4 versions as I'm not thrilled about the possibility of the controller declaring the volume/disks degraded unnecessarily and although I have the DOS utility WDTLER where one is supposed to be able to enable/disable TLER on WD drives - I suspect WD is way beyond that now anyway with current builds.
I agree with you about just testing the performance of the options for the raptors - on the mobo and then on the controller. When I benchmark them I'll post the results in case others are curious.
Thanks again....off to EggHead! -
How to install the driver of the 'SCSI and RAID Host Controller'
Hi,
I have two Windows XP(32Bit) installations:
•Windows XP SP2(32Bit) which is old and it seems as if it is infected by some viruses.
•I have installed another fresh clean Windows XP(32Bit) SP3. However, I have found that there is no category named with ''SCSI and RAID Host Controller'. However, when checking out the old version of Windows XP, I found 'SCSI and RAID Host Controller'
is there. (Screen shot below)
The new Windows XP(32Bit) SP3, there is no 'SCSI and RAID Host Controller'
My motherboard is:
My Desktop Computer(Intel P 4, 512MB of RAM, and Graphics Card with 256MB of RAM.
]I am seeing that most computer doesn't has the scsi / raid controller . in the old Windows XP on my computer that SCSI and RAID controller exists, and it it has not a yellow mark on it.
When I installed a new windwos XP 32Bit SP3, no SCSI/RAID in divice manager .
My computer sound on new Windows XP doesn't work , however, on old Windows XP SP2 works well. I have a buitl-in sound card. SCSI and RAID controller category in the device manager on the old Windows xp SP2 is realted to sound card,I don't think.
Thus, What drivers would let the 'SCSI and RAID Host Controller' added in the device manager?
A man should convert his anger and sadness into strength to continue living in this life.If you open the case and shine a light on the motherboard you can usually see both the manufacturers name and the model printed on the pcb somewhere. You should also normally see this information on the first POST screen when you turn on the PC.
Otherwise Google "775i65G" like I did.
Here are the driver downloads (assuming it is an Asrock 775i65G R2.0 and not an R3.0)
http://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/775i65G%20R2.0/?cat=Download&os=XP
You should install the inf driver first. Hopefully after you do that you will see your desired listing in Device Manager.
With regard to the AMR driver and the HDMR driver, you can find some information about these here :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio/modem_riser
Unless you actually have something plugged into these risers, it is probably not necessary to install the drivers.
However, the drivers for the integrated C-Media audio chip and the Realtek Lan chip may prove useful.
It looks like the motherboard has integrated video but if you are using a graphics card it will not normally be necessary to install the VGA driver.
You can download both the manual and the installation guide here
http://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/775i65G/?cat=Manual
And if "SCSI and RAID Host Controller" is still not shown in Device Manager, don't worry - because these functions are not supported by your motherboard (again assuming it is an Asrock 775i65G)
Thanks a lot,
First of all, when saying that I have multi-operationgs systems, I mean there are two operating systems installed on my PC(SP2, SP3) both are 32Bit. The first Windows SP2(NOT installed by me) has all multimedia audio card installed
well, and has SCSI and RAID Host Controller shown the device manager. However, only the VGA is not installed on Windows SP2. However, the second one Windows SP3(Installed by me) has VGA not installed, Multimedia audio NOT installed, and there is no SCSI and
RAID Host Controller in device manager.
First: Why did the CPUz, specy didn't detect motherboard name, and only detect the model. IF I need to open the case and shine a light on the motherboard you can usually see both the manufacturers name and the model printed on
the pcb somewhere, then what benfit would be there from hardware detection software?
Second: Yes, my motherboard has integrated video, and integrated audio card
However, this doesn't mean that I don't need to install them since the Vidoe controller is not properly installed (it is a default VGA ) Also, Multimedia audio controller is not functiong at all.
Finally: if And if "SCSI and RAID Host Controller" is still not shown in Device Manager in Windows XP SP3, because these functions are not supported by my motherboard, then why is 'SCSI and RAID Host
Controller' installed/shown in the device manger in Windows XP SP2 on the same PC???
A man should convert his anger and sadness into strength to continue living in this life. -
Do I need a RAID system or just a larger external hard drive
Hi guys... I am working in my fathers company and running the media side of our small business. I do our website, print media and also our video production....
I have an iMac and it is running on 500gig of storage and 8meg of RAM.... I have almost filled up my hard drive and I am looking into to getting into to doing a lot more video work....
I need more storage, but I am not sure whether to invest in a RAID system or should I just get an external hard drive...
At what point is a RAID worth the investment ?
Thanks guys
HarrisonRAID provides a level of redundacy should one of the hard drives in the array fail.
I would only invest in RAID if you are able to support the RAID array and understand its limitations.
Remember RAID is not backup. Don't be complacent about backup.
A larger hard disk is simplier to manage than a RAID array.
As with any mission critical data, you need a robust backup strategy. -
Could not mount USB drive on Solaris 10 x86 system
Hi All,
I am having difficulty mounting a USB drive on Solaris 10 x86 system with the following different unsuccessful attempts:
# uname -a
SunOS venus 5.10 Generic_139556-08 i86pc i386 i86pc
# rmformat
Looking for devices...
1. Volmgt Node: /vol/dev/aliases/cdrom0
Logical Node: /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s2
Physical Node: /pci@0,0/pci-ide@4/ide@0/sd@0,0
Connected Device: TEAC DV-28E-V 1.AC
Device Type: DVD Reader
2. Logical Node: /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0s2
Physical Node: /pci@0,0/pci108e,534b@2,1/storage@9/disk@0,0
Connected Device: WD My Book 1140 1007
Device Type: Removable
3. Volmgt Node: /vol/dev/aliases/rmdisk0
Logical Node: /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0p0
Physical Node: /pci@0,0/pci108e,534b@2,1/storage@9/disk@0,0
Connected Device: WD My Book 1140 1007
Device Type: Removable
# svcs volfs
STATE STIME FMRI
online Apr_13 svc:/system/filesystem/volfs:default# ls -lt /mnt
total 0
# mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c4t0d0p0:c /mnt
mount: I/O error
# mount -F pcfs /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0p0:c /mnt
mount: Block device required
# mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c4t0d0s2:c /mnt
mount: I/O error
# mount -F pcfs /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0s2:c /mnt
mount: Block device required
# fsck /dev/dsk/c4t0d0p0
Can't open /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0p0: I/O error
# fsck /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0p0
Can't open /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0p0: I/O error
# fsck /dev/dsk/c4t0d0s2
Can't open /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0s2: I/O error
# fsck /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0s2
Can't open /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0s2: I/O errorSecond try,
# svcadm disable volfs
# svcs volfs
STATE STIME FMRI
disabled 20:47:00 svc:/system/filesystem/volfs:default
# mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c4t0d0p0:c /mnt
mount: I/O errorLast try,
# mkdir /rmdisk
mkdir: Failed to make directory "/rmdisk"; File exists
# ls -lt /rmdisk
total 4
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root nobody 16 Oct 1 2009 rmdisk0 -> ./unnamed_rmdik
drwxr-xr-x 2 root nobody 512 Sep 30 2009 unnamed_rmdisk
# cd /rmdisk
# ls -lt
total 4
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root nobody 16 Oct 1 2009 rmdisk0 -> ./unnamed_rmdik
drwxr-xr-x 2 root nobody 512 Sep 30 2009 unnamed_rmdisk
# ls -lt unnamed_rmdisk
total 0
# ls -lt rmdisk0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root nobody 16 Oct 1 2009 rmdisk0 -> ./unnamed_rmdik
# df -h
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 5.1G 4.0G 1.1G 78% /
/devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 5.9G 984K 5.9G 1% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object
sharefs 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/dfs/sharetab
/usr/lib/libc/libc_hwcap2.so.1
5.1G 4.0G 1.1G 78% /lib/libc.so.1
fd 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev/fd
swap 5.9G 148K 5.9G 1% /tmp
swap 5.9G 32K 5.9G 1% /var/run
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s7 129G 1.7G 126G 2% /export/home
# /etc/init.d/volmgt stop
# svcs volfs
STATE STIME FMRI
disabled 21:02:31 svc:/system/filesystem/volfs:default
# pwd
/rmdisk
# cd /
# ls -lt /rmdisk
total 4
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root nobody 16 Oct 1 2009 rmdisk0 -> ./unnamed_rmdik
drwxr-xr-x 2 root nobody 512 Sep 30 2009 unnamed_rmdisk
# /etc/init.d/volmgt st
# svcs volfs
STATE STIME FMRI
disabled 21:02:31 svc:/system/filesystem/volfs:default
# /etc/init.d/volmgt start
volume management starting.
# svcs volfs
STATE STIME FMRI
online 21:04:44 svc:/system/filesystem/volfs:default
# svcs volfs
# mount | grep rmdisk
# pwd
# ls -lt /rmdisk
total 4
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root nobody 16 Oct 1 2009 rmdisk0 -> ./unnamed_rmdik
drwxr-xr-x 2 root nobody 512 Sep 30 2009 unnamed_rmdisk
# ls -lt /rmdisk/unnamed_rmdisk
total 0
# iostat -En
c0t0d0 Soft Errors: 3 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0
Vendor: TEAC Product: DV-28E-V Revision: 1.AC Serial No:
Size: 0.00GB <0 bytes>
Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0
Illegal Request: 3 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0
c1t0d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0
Vendor: HITACHI Product: HUS1514SBSUN146G Revision: SA04 Serial No: 0921B2Y3PC
Size: 146.81GB <146810535936 bytes>
Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0
Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0
c1t1d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0
Vendor: HITACHI Product: HUS1514SBSUN146G Revision: SA04 Serial No: 0921B2Z5NC
Size: 146.81GB <146810535936 bytes>
Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0
Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0
c4t0d0 Soft Errors: 21 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0
Vendor: WD Product: My Book 1140 Revision: 1007 Serial No:
Size: 2000.37GB <2000365289472 bytes>
Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0
Illegal Request: 21 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0
#This is a working production system with 2 146.81GB mirrored hard disks. There is no disk error for either local or external 2TB Western Digital USB disks that works on Windows 7 or XP.
Any idea on what else to look for?
Thanks in advance,
Jack
Edited by: 797805 on 6/06/2012 04:48Hi All,
Looks like it was a driver / incompatibility / unsupported issue since 2 other much smaller USB keys (Lexar USB Flash Drive – 32GB, SanDisk Cruzer Colors – 4GB) were successfully mounted automatically by volfs service as follows:
# df -h
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 5.1G 4.0G 1.1G 78% /
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s7 129G 1.7G 126G 2% /export/home
/vol/dev/dsk/c3t0d0/unnamed_rmdisk#1:c 3.7G 2.4G 1.3G 65% /rmdisk/unnamed_rmdisk#1
/vol/dev/dsk/c2t0d0/unnamed_rmdisk:c 29G 96K 29G 1% /rmdisk/unnamed_rmdiskIt also appears that the Device status of Not Ready from “iostat –En” below may not be correct either since both smaller drives are working fine:
# iostat -En
c4t0d0 Soft Errors: 23 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0
Vendor: WD Product: My Book 1140 Revision: 1007 Serial No:
Size: 2000.37GB <2000365289472 bytes>
Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0
Illegal Request: 23 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0
c2t0d0 Soft Errors: 7 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0
Vendor: Lexar Product: USB Flash Drive Revision: 1100 Serial No:
Size: 31.41GB <31406948352 bytes>
Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0
Illegal Request: 7 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0
c3t0d0 Soft Errors: 60 Hard Errors: 8 Transport Errors: 0
Vendor: SanDisk Product: Cruzer Colors+ Revision: 8.02 Serial No:
Size: 4.02GB <4022337024 bytes>
Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 8 Recoverable: 0
Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0In other word, the same question remains on whether it is possible to install a driver to overcome this issue and where to such driver?
It is necessary to install additional driver that came with the disk on Windows XP platform. However,
Thanks again,
Jack
Maybe you are looking for
-
My iPhone was working fine yesterday and then showed a grey screen with the message 'ios6'. When I tried to use the phone it came up with the error message 'connect to iTunes'. When I got home from work I did this, at first iTunes could not detect th
-
I cannot use the chat feature in my Yahoo mail account
I cannot use the chat feature in my Yahoo account using Firefox browser, yet I CAN use this feature when going through Internet Explorer. Why? I have uninstalled Firefox and reinstalled it. I have about a million copies of the flash player now instal
-
Pull XMLDATA from Varchar2 column type
Hi All, I have a column (data_xml) in a table of varchar2(400) type in which XML data is stored. I want to read that data through sql query. The Problem: In xml there is something called <comments>AT&T </comments> which is causing a problem because o
-
In the log file I get this: 2 errors with the message: "No scheduler found with name IDPSchedulerService"; the stack dump says this: "tack Dump = com.adobe.idp.event.exception.EventCreateException: Event for event-type TaskCreated cannot be created i
-
DACL with static IP configuration
Hi, I want to restrict client communication based on dACLs for some Endpoint-Groups with MAB. Most of the clients are configured with DHCP, for these clients everything working fine. But there are also clients with static IP configuration and here is