Solaris administration certfication upgrade
Hi All,
Which course will be better to go after Oracle Solaris 10 System Administration Certified Professional. Which one will be better Sun cluster 3.2/ IBM AIX/ HP-UNIX ?
I need advice since I am going to upgrade my skills.
Thanks in advance
user13540780 wrote:
Hi All,
Which course will be better to go after Oracle Solaris 10 System Administration Certified Professional. Which one will be better Sun cluster 3.2/ IBM AIX/ HP-UNIX ?
I need advice since I am going to upgrade my skills.
Thanks in advanceThe first skill is to think clearly. A 'course' usually means a training course ... yet your questions seems to imply certifications ... especially given you are in a certifcation forum.
One of the more typically reason to choose one or other of the above direcions may be what is useful to your current work; or what you may feel may be useful in getting you a promotion or work with a different employer. If this is the case you need to research your local market. For example on Inishmurray the demand for HP/UX; AIX and Solaris is about equal.
My persoanl evaluation is HP-UX is in decline; I'm not sure what the roadmap is. And unfortunately same seems true of openVMS. Feel free to prove me wrong.
And you haven't mentioned Solaris 11 ....................
As in all cases certificaitons without the experience to back it may not be particualry useful.
And perhaps a linux certification should be considered if you must go wider rather than deeper.
Again AIX is a little difference; but will without the experience would it count for much? It depends on a lot of factors.
In all events the choice is yours ....... but if you do your own research carefully and honestly you may avoid some poor answers.
Similar Messages
-
New to Solaris administration - Need some help with some issues
Hello all,
I am a new to Solaris administration and need some assistance with a few things. I was going to make separate posts but decided it would be easy to keep track of in one. I really do not know much about the OS but I do have a little Linux background so that might help me out. I am going to number my problems to keep them sorted, so here we go.
The machine:
Sunfire V880
4x 73GB HDs
PCI dual fiber channel host adapter
Attached RAID array:
Sun StorEdge T3 Array with 9x 73GB HDs
Sun DDS4 Tape Drive in a Unipack
OS: Solaris 5.10
Updates: Updated everything except 2 patches (Updating is a real pain isn't it? At least it seems that way to me.)
1. So I might as well start with the update issues! These 2 updates will not install:
-PostgreSQL 8.2 source code, (137004-02)
Utility used to install the update failed with exit code {0}.
-Patch for mediaLib in solaris, (121620-03)
Install of update failed. Utility used to install the update is not able to save files. Utility used to install the update failed with exit code 4.
No idea why the PostgreSQL update is not working, but the medialib patch seems to not have enough hard drive space.
2. Where are all the drives? I don't know how to find the RAID box or the other 3 internal hard drives. When I installed the OS, I think I installed it on only one hard drive and that might be part of the reason why the medialibe update above says that I don't have enough space.
3. I probably need more space for the OS and updates, is there a way to "add" space onto the hard drive that currently is running the OS?
3. Once I see the other hard drives I wish to combine them to make a RAID 0 and RAID 5 array, how do I go about doing that?
4. How can I find/see the tape drive?
5. Does my swap space really need to be 64GB? I know the book I have read suggests it, but I only made it 5GB because it didn't seem to make sense to make it 64GB.
Thank you in advance for the help. I know these are a lot of questions to ask but please go easy on me :)
rjbanker
Edited by: rjbanker on Mar 7, 2008 8:21 AMSolarisSAinPA*
1.
-PostgreSQL 8.2 source code, (137004-02)
Utility used to install the update failed with exit code {0}.
Exit code 0 means there were no errors. When you run showrev -p 137004-02, does your system show that the patch is installed? You can check the log for a particular patch add attempt in /var/sadm/patch/+patch_num_rev+1- A bunch of stuff shows up, here is a portion (I am not entirely sure what it means, there must be a least a page of stuff like this):
Patch: 121081-08 Obsoletes: Requires: 121453-02 Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWc cccrr, SUNWccccr, SUNWccfw, SUNWccsign, SUNWcctpx, SUNWccinv, SUNWccccfg, SUNWcc fwctrl
Patch: 122231-01 Obsoletes: Requires: 121453-02 Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWc ctpx
Patch: 120932-01 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWcctpx
Patch: 123123-02 Obsoletes: Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWccinv
Patch: 121118-12 Obsoletes: Requires: 121453-02 Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWc smauth, SUNWppror, SUNWpprou, SUNWupdatemgru, SUNWupdatemgrr, SUNWppro-plugin-su nos-base
2.
Where are all the drives? I don't know how to find the RAID box or the other 3 internal hard drives. When I >installed the OS, I think I installed it on only one hard drive and that might be part of the reason why the >medialibe update above says that I don't have enough space.
When you run format command, how many drives are listed? Identify your root drive (compare with output of df command you ran earlier) Please post here.2. Output of df-hk, looks like I ran out of room. Should I just go ahead and reinstall the OS?
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 5.9G 5.4G 378M 94% /
/devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 42G 1.3M 42G 1% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object
/platform/sun4u-us3/lib/libc_psr/libc_psr_hwcap1.so.1
5.9G 5.4G 378M 94% /platform/sun4u-us3/lib/libc_psr.so.1
/platform/sun4u-us3/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr/libc_psr_hwcap1.so.1
5.9G 5.4G 378M 94% /platform/sun4u-us3/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr.so.1
fd 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev/fd
swap 42G 1.1M 42G 1% /tmp
swap 42G 32K 42G 1% /var/run
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s7 46G 47M 46G 1% /export/home
3. So I guess the general consensus is to reinstall the OS, is that correct?
4. There is nothing in \dev\rmt, and unfortunately I don't have a tape to test it with!
5. I guess 5GB will be ok for what we do.
Alan.pae*
1. I think the above text might explain why it failed, although I don't know how to correct it.
2. Output of format:
# mount
/ on /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 read/write/setuid/devices/intr/largefiles/logging/xattr/onerror=panic/dev=1d80008 on Mon Mar 10 10:56:51 2008
/devices on /devices read/write/setuid/devices/dev=4dc0000 on Mon Mar 10 10:56:19 2008
/system/contract on ctfs read/write/setuid/devices/dev=4e00001 on Mon Mar 10 10:56:19 2008
/proc on proc read/write/setuid/devices/dev=4e40000 on Mon Mar 10 10:56:19 2008
/etc/mnttab on mnttab read/write/setuid/devices/dev=4e80001 on Mon Mar 10 10:56:19 2008
/etc/svc/volatile on swap read/write/setuid/devices/xattr/dev=4ec0001 on Mon Mar 10 10:56:19 2008
/system/object on objfs read/write/setuid/devices/dev=4f00001 on Mon Mar 10 10:56:19 2008
/platform/sun4u-us3/lib/libc_psr.so.1 on /platform/sun4u-us3/lib/libc_psr/libc_psr_hwcap1.so.1 read/write/setuid/devices/dev=1d80008 on Mon Mar 10 10:56:50 2008
/platform/sun4u-us3/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr.so.1 on /platform/sun4u-us3/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr/libc_psr_hwcap1.so.1 read/write/setuid/devices/dev=1d80008 on Mon Mar 10 10:56:50 2008
/dev/fd on fd read/write/setuid/devices/dev=50c0001 on Mon Mar 10 10:56:51 2008
/tmp on swap read/write/setuid/devices/xattr/dev=4ec0002 on Mon Mar 10 10:56:52 2008
/var/run on swap read/write/setuid/devices/xattr/dev=4ec0003 on Mon Mar 10 10:56:52 2008
/export/home on /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s7 read/write/setuid/devices/intr/largefiles/logging/xattr/onerror=panic/dev=1d8000f on Mon Mar 10 10:56:57 2008
3. Judging by the above text I will be doing a reinstall huh?
4. Actually I am not familiar with tape backups let alone solaris backup apps! Any suggestions? (Preferably free, have to cut down on costs.)
5. No comment
Thanks for the help, hope to hear from you again!
rjbanker -
Solaris 9 404 Upgrade to Solaris 10 on Ultra 10
I tried to do a Solaris 9 404 Upgrade to Solaris 10 on my Ultra 10 with SVM mirrored system drives and it wouldn't get past the Upgrade Profile Initialisation section. It stayed there for a long time, maybe 20 minutes and finally came up with a Failed screen. It compalined about a missing device name, said it couldn't find root or boot and mentioned something about filesystem backups.
Is an upgrade from tis configuration really supported?
Ultra 10 440MHZ 768MB RAM. Dual 73GB SCSI mirrored with SVM system drives. One 120GB IDE media drive. There is only a main and a swap partition on the system drive ie everything is in /.
Am currently backing up the data I want from the system drives prior to attempting an initial install but I'd obviously prefer to upgrade the system and keep the SVM filesystems as they are.
Nick ([email protected])I would break your mirror and do a liveupgrade on the available mirror. Then boot that disk.
-
Requirement for Sun solaris administrator
Hi,
I work as a recruiter . My client is looking for a Sun solaris administrator with clearcase experience.
Project : 3 months in NYC.
Websphere admin experience is preferred.
Pls send across resumes to [email protected]
This is an immediate opening.
Regards
ReacruiterYou will need to register the system by using either updatemanager (GUI) or sconadm (CLI).
For registering with updatemanager see the following URL:
http://docs.sun.com/source/835-0615/Registering.html
And for sconadm:
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-9-82688-1
Note that the systems will need to be connected to the Internet (either directly, or via a proxy) in order to register them and to manage them via the online portal. -
Looking for an Introduction documentation for SOLARIS administration
I'm beginner in SOLARIS environment. I�m looking for an overview documentation for SOLARIS administration as like as IBM AIX Redbooks. For example, the "Certification Study Guide" for IBM pSeries is an excellent introduction to AIX environment (485 pages in pdf format). I'm looking for something like that. Do you have an idea?
I found the following book to be more than helpful. If you're willing to spend the dough I can guarantee that it's more than worth it!
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/007222598X/qid=1087539512/sr=ka-2/ref=pd_ka_2/104-6613636-3615953 -
Getting error after administrator who upgraded from CS3 to CS4
Hi,
We have had an administrator who upgraded from CS3 to CS4.
However, any of our other users still using CS3 now get the
following error message:
“The website is being administered with a newer version
of Contribute. For more information contact this website's
administrator."
Do you know any way around this issue?
Thanks,
Gregquote:
Originally posted by:
sdfsdf e3wwre4
Just wondering if somebody here can clerify the following....
If I upgrade contribute and then administer a contribute enabled
website will users of CS3 still be able to edit the site or will
the be forced to update as well?
Hi,
No they don't have to, at least I think so. If your
administror go to the menubar: Contribute>Administer
Websites> Choose the site you wish to set the settings for. In
'Compatibility' choose 'Transition Mode' and klik OK. This should
allow the other users to keep working in their version of
Contribute.
I say 'should'... Read my entry in the general discussion
forum.
(a not so happy) Ingrid -
Solaris 8 - 10 upgrade options
I want to upgrade a Sol. 8 sytem to Sol. 10 but acomplish 2 objectives in the process:
1.) Reduce the system disk mounts pts (/var,/opt) to just /
2.) Attempt to do a UPGRADE install so as to not have to restore all my custom apps.
I tried a quick UPGRADE install and it failed during the testing upgrade profiile - /usr on Sol. 8 disk is only 2GB big and Sol. 10 needed 4GB.
I tried a UPGRADE install again but specified a backup media of a spare partition on a spare dirve that is the size of the Sol. 8 system disk but it too failed during install on restoring /usr to 2GB partition.
I then did the INITIAL install option and could specify my own partition layout and afterwards restore all custom files but it is very time consuming.
Is there a way to upgrade the Sol. 8 system that would allow me to specify the partion layout - short of the INITIAL install option and have solaris install do the restores for me?
Thanks in advance,
DinoAnswered my Q - I used Live Upgrade!
With a spare drive >= size of current Sol 8 system disk I was able to copy Sol 8 O/S and perform Sol 10 UPGRADE install via Live Upgrade and have it combine /var and /opt back into root - NEAT-OOOO!!
Only bug - Live Upgrade set mount permission on /usr to 700 that caused some initial problems until I booted off DVD and chmod-ed /usr to 755. Now everything is OK.
Dino -
Solaris 2.6 upgrade to version 8 on SUN ULTRA 10
Dear Mr. or Mrs:
I met the same question as uxdms who left the message on Dec 20,2001.
When I was trying to upgrade from solaris 2.6 to 8 release , there is "failed" warning and the upgrade isn't created.
There is a detailed info:
Mechine: SUN ULTRA 10
Media:
Solaris 8 installation -- SPARC Platform Edition
Solaris 8 software 1 of 2 -- SPARC Platform Edition
Solaris 8 software 2 of 2 -- SPARC Platform Edition
Installation step:
Accordidng to the guide of installation, run step by step,
and there are some special steps below:
(1) use the /dev/dsk /c0t0d0s4 as disk slice to upgrade.
(2) selet networked
(3) don't use DHCP
(4) disable IPv6
(5) no NIS+, NIS, DNS ..
.... displaying the wolcome to solaris dialog box
(1) Solaris 8 installation SPARC Platform Edition is ejected.
(2) prompted to insert the Solaris 8 software 1 of 2.
(3)After selecting serial the dialog box of the upgrade..
(4)system prompted upgrading...
initialation is done.
Checking file system is done.
(5) There is a installation summary displayed:
installation summary
The solaris installation status is shown below
product status infor.
Solaris 8 software Failed Detailed(button)
After click the Detailed button, there is a dialog box
Failed:
Log file: /a/var/sadm.system/logs/upgrade_log
Question is:
I can't find the file of upgrade_log , and the webstart install stops on it.
I appreciate for your kind help
Melanie
the webstart install stops on initalization -- with 'failed' warningHi,
If this problem is reproduceable, provide me the exact console error (failed) message to further investigate on this issue.
Senthilkumar
Developer Technical Support
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
http://www.sun.com/developers/support -
We are in the process of upgrading solaris 8 to 9 (Sun Sparc). When installing the patches (patch# 121430), we are getting an error message "patchadd 121430-10
Checking installed patches...
One or more patch packages included in
121430-10 are not installed on this system
Patchadd is terminating"
Can somebody help me with this? Its very urgent. I appreciate any help of yours
Regards,
VjWe are in the process of upgrading solaris 8 to 9
(Sun Sparc). When installing the patches (patch#What patches? You don't upgrade an OS by applying patches.
ckages included in
121430-10 are not installed on this systemRead this message. It's very clear. You are trying to apply a patch to something that is not there. Just ignore this message. -
Solaris 2.6 upgrade to version 8
When trying to upgrade an E450 (3 Gb swap) from Solaris 2.6 to 8 release 01/01, the webstart install stops on initialization - with 'failed' warning - and the upgrade-log isn't created.
Thanks for any help.Hi,
If this problem is reproduceable, provide me the exact console error (failed) message to further investigate on this issue.
Senthilkumar
Developer Technical Support
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
http://www.sun.com/developers/support -
Solaris 10 u3 upgrade to u4 not working
Trying to update from a patched solaris 10 u3 to solaris 10 u4 and it keeps failing.
its a mirrored boot with solaris 10 and solaris express installed.
The error it gives is that either it can't find the OS to upgrade or its un-upgradeable.
Any ideas why it fails and how i can get this to work?You need to delete all local metadevices and metadb before upgrading.
It seem to be a bug. -
Solaris 9 live upgrade to solaris 10 segmentation fault
pre-upgrade work:
apply patch doc 72099
upgrade live upgrade to solaris 10.
lucreate-m /:/dev/dsk/c0t1d0s0:ufs -m /var:/dev/dsk/c0t1d0s1:ufs -m /opt:/dev/dsk/c0t1d0s3:ufs -n sol10
it works well
oot Environment Is Active Active Can Copy
Name Complete Now On Reboot Delete Status
sol9 yes yes yes no -
sol10 yes no no yes -
But luupgrade -u -n sol10 -s /sol11
Validating the contents of the media </sol11>.
The media is a standard Solaris media.
The media contains an operating system upgrade image.
The media contains <Solaris> version <11>.
Constructing upgrade profile to use.
Locating the operating system upgrade program.
Checking for existence of previously scheduled Live Upgrade requests.
Creating upgrade profile for BE <sol10>.
Determining packages to install or upgrade for BE <sol10>.
Performing the operating system upgrade of the BE <sol10>.
CAUTION: Interrupting this process may leave the boot environment unstable
or unbootable.
/usr/sbin/luupgrade[677]: 6549 Segmentation Fault(coredump)
ERROR: Installation of the packages from this media of the media failed; pfinstall returned these diagnostics:
The Solaris upgrade of the boot environment <sol10> failed.I would break your mirror and do a liveupgrade on the available mirror. Then boot that disk.
-
Solaris 10 Live Upgrade with Veritas Volume Manager 4.1
What is the latest version of Live Upgrade?
I need to upgrade our systems from Solaris 8 to Solaris 10. All our systems have Veritas VxVM 4.1, with the O.S disks encapsulated and mirrored.
Whats the best way to do the Live Upgrade. Anyone have clean documents for the same ?There are more things that you need to do.
Read veritas install guide -- it has a pretty good section of what needs to be done.
http://www.sun.com/products-n-solutions/hardware/docs/Software/Storage_Software/VERITAS_Volume_Manager/ -
Solaris 10 live upgrade failed
I am trying to upgrade Solaris 10 U6 10/08 to U7 05/09 with live upgrade. But it failed with following errors:
# luupgrade -u -n solaris_u7 -s /mnt/cdrom
No entry for BE <solaris_u7> in GRUB menu
Copying failsafe kernel from media.
Uncompressing miniroot
Creating miniroot device
miniroot filesystem is <ufs>
Mounting miniroot at </mnt/cdrom/Solaris_10/Tools/Boot>
Validating the contents of the media </mnt/cdrom>.
The media is a standard Solaris media.
The media contains an operating system upgrade image.
The media contains <Solaris> version <10>.
Constructing upgrade profile to use.
Locating the operating system upgrade program.
Checking for existence of previously scheduled Live Upgrade requests.
Creating upgrade profile for BE <solaris_u7>.
Checking for GRUB menu on ABE <solaris_u7>.
Saving GRUB menu on ABE <solaris_u7>.
Checking for x86 boot partition on ABE.
Determining packages to install or upgrade for BE <solaris_u7>.
Performing the operating system upgrade of the BE <solaris_u7>.
CAUTION: Interrupting this process may leave the boot environment unstable
or unbootable.
ERROR: Installation of the packages from this media of the media failed; pfinstall returned these diagnostics:
Processing profile
Loading local environment and services
Generating upgrade actions
WARNING: SUNWwgetu depends on SUNWgcmn, which is not selected
WARNING: SUNWi15cs depends on SUNWi15rf, which is not selected
WARNING: SUNWi1cs depends on SUNWxwplt, which is not selected
WARNING: SUNWbind depends on SUNWbindr, which is not selected
WARNING: SUNWale depends on SUNWxwrtl, which is not selected
WARNING: SUNWale depends on SUNWxwplt, which is not selected
ERROR: No upgradeable file systems found at specified mount point.
Restoring GRUB menu on ABE <solaris_u7>.
ABE boot partition backing deleted.
PBE GRUB has no capability information.
PBE GRUB has no versioning information.
ABE GRUB is newer than PBE GRUB. Updating GRUB.
GRUB update was successfull.
Did it really fail due to file dependencies? Will it fix the problem by installing the missing packages on the running BE?You need to run this script from the CD or Install server: Solaris_10/Tools/Installers/liveupgrade20 when upgrading to 10 u7. I had run into this. Run the script and choose all the defaults. Liveupgrade will then not give the errors you have seen.
Linuxbass :-) -
Error attempting to apply a Solaris 10 release (upgrade)
I am trying to apply a Solaris 10 upgrade release to my E450 server, but get the following error:
"Could not reinitialize system state, please exit installer and try again"
The current release on the server is 10 1/06 and I am trying to move this to 10 6/06.
Anyone got any idea what it is complaining about, the process worked OK on my V480 servers!.For anyone that gets the same issue, I found the problem to be my vfstab file.
I deleted all filesystems from it apart from the system areas / /usr /var and swap and the install process worked.
Cannot see anything wrong with the entries that were in the vfstab file, so I guess it is some kind of bug in the upgrade program.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Error in Crystal Reports 9 and Ras 9
Hi, Hepl please. Server Error in '/GestaoWeb/GestaoWebSeguro' Application. Method not found: Void CrystalDecisions.ReportAppServer.Controllers.ISCRSubreportController.SetDataSource(System.String, System.Object, System.String, System.String). Descrip
-
Samsung NP305V5A: Screen does not come back after resume
The issue: screen does not turn ON when resuming from suspend-to-ram. PC fans start working. I can even "gently" reboot the notebook, by pressing <Ctrl>+<Alt>+<F1>, then <Ctrl>+<Alt>+<Del>. But the screen does not work.. Note: resume worked with the
-
Pdf Form sumitt button not working on a website
Trying to figure out how to make a summit button that I put pdf form that i loaded up the a website work it's not sumitting
-
I have downloaded the adobe reader for my samsung tablet. I cant open any pdf files it says I have to download the latest version.
-
Command Center Crashes When Launched
MS-7738 / Bios 3.7 / Windows 7 When I run the command center v1.0.0.65 the screen loads, I see the GUI, then windows error message appears "commandcenter has stopped working" Have tried uninstall, re-install of command center and also same for .Net