Solaris Installion - 32 Bit System

I have a Laptop having intel processor. How I install Solaris 10 on my laptop? Is it is compatible with the hardware an d no los will occured in the near future in my laptop.......

You can't. Solaris 10 is 64-bit only, even for Intel. A friend of mine tried to install the latest Solaris 10 on an old, dual-Pentium server and he couldn't install it either.
If I recall, the very, very, VERY first version of Solaris 10 had 32-bit libraries, but even then Sun announced that they'd be going to 64-bit libraries. The best that you can really hope for is Solaris 9.

Similar Messages

  • How to install Apache Http server on Solaris sparc-32 bit systems

    Hi Friends,
    I installed apache in windows platform, where we have direct .exe file to install apache on windows.
    I heard, in solaris different process of installation is that right...?
    will we get direct .bin executable file for apache like wls923_solaris32.bin or need to we follow diff procedure for apache installation in solaris.
    Please help me
    Thanks
    Deep
    Edited by: user10249953 on Feb 22, 2009 8:28 PM

    Hi Friends,
    I installed apache in windows platform, where we have direct .exe file to install apache on windows.
    I heard, in solaris different process of installation is that right...?
    will we get direct .bin executable file for apache like wls923_solaris32.bin or need to we follow diff procedure for apache installation in solaris.
    Please help me
    Thanks
    Deep
    Edited by: user10249953 on Feb 22, 2009 8:28 PM

  • Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit on Solaris 8 64-bit ( boot-mode)

    Hi:
    i have questions :
    I have Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit product, i'll need run on solaris 8
    ( 64-bit boot-mode ) .
    Is there Problems wiht that???
    My hardware is :
    Sun Microsystems sun4u
    Sun Enterprise 420R (2 X UltraSPARC-II 450MHz)
    System clock frequency: 113 MHz
    Memory size: 2048 Megabytes
    ========================= CPUs =========================
    Run Ecache CPU CPU
    Brd CPU Module MHz MB Impl. Mask
    0 1 1 450 4.0 US-II 10.0
    0 2 2 450 4.0 US-II 10.0
    mymachine#isainfo -v
    64-bit sparcv9 applications
    32-bit sparc applications
    thanks ...
    Alex ...

    Hi Anthony :
    Do you know something about performace between
    Tuxedo 32-bit and Tuxedo 64-bit ?
    Thanks ...
    Alex ...
    Do you working in Bea or other Enterprise ??
    "Anthony Fryer" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    Hi Alex, we are also using tuxedo 32-bit on Solaris 64-bit operating
    system. There
    is no problem doing this as your solaris version supports both 32 bit
    and 64 bit
    programs. The things to watch out for are when you are building a tuxedo
    application,
    you have to make sure that all the libraries you link with are also 32
    bit libraries,
    including oracle. We ran into build problems when some libraries were
    32 bit
    and others were 64 bit.
    There's good information about 32bit v 64bit on solaris at the following
    web site...
    http://docs.sun.com/?p=/doc/806-6543/6jffrdmee&a=view
    I personally would use 64bit if possible, but it's no big deal to build
    32 bit
    applications because my tuxedo application does not need a 64bit address
    space
    and is not computationally heavy. Most of the CPU takes place in the
    database,
    which in our case is Oracle, and which happens to be 64bit anyway. So
    it's not
    a bad thing to build a 32 bit tuxedo application that runs on a 64 bit
    operating
    system, for most types of tuxedo applications.
    "alex fuentes" <[email protected]> wrote:
    Hi again :
    you link show that :
    Sun Solaris 8 tuxedo v8.0 Native 64-bit version - SPARC
    Sun Solaris 8 SPARC X *(using 2.7 32-bit binaries)
    32-bit on 64-bit OS supported
    Then Tuxedo 8.0 32.bit ruuning on Solaris 8 64-bit. OK
    there is support from Bea . Is that is correct ???
    I'll need used Tuxedo 64-bit ,you could benefit in performance.
    Thanks Thanks ...
    Alex ..
    Scott Orshan <[email protected]> wrote:
    If the platform list shows that a 32-bit build is certified on a 64bit
    OS, then you can run it there.
    If you want an actual 64 bit build, it is because you want the big
    address space, longer longs in FML, and everything else you get from
    64
    bits.
    If you want to have an application span Solaris and Digital UNIX, which
    is always 64 bit, you might want both to be 64 bits so that you do
    not
    lose any data in the conversion.
    On HP, you can't link 32-bit Tuxedo with another product that is 64-bit
    (Oracle for example). You might need a 64 bit Tuxedo in order to work
    with other products.
         Scott Orshan
    alex fuentes wrote:
    HI :
    I have Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit for solaris, my questions is :
    Is there problems whith Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit running on Solaris 8 alsorunning 64-bit
    ( boot-mode )?
    there is a Tuxedo 8.0 64-bit Why ??
    Which different between Tuxedo 8.0 32-bit and 64-bit ??
    Thanks ....
    Alex ..

  • Installing 64-bit System

    When I boot the Solaris 10 install CD on my Opteron system, it always boots the 32-bit kernel. How do I force it to boot the 64-bit kernel?
    I assume that if I boot the 64-bit kernel from the install CD that installing Solaris will install the 64-bit system. Is this correct?
    Thanks.
    -Jerry

    When I boot the Solaris 10 install CD on my Opteron
    system, it always boots the 32-bit kernel. How do I
    force it to boot the 64-bit kernel?You cannot. The install CD only contains a 32-bit kernel.
    But it includes 32- and 64-bit install packages!
    As soon as you boot the installed Solaris from HDD, you should
    get a 64 bit kernel.
    I assume that if I boot the 64-bit kernel from the
    install CD that installing Solaris will install the
    64-bit system. Is this correct?No.

  • Solaris 10 64 bit for x86

    When i typed isainfo -kv the output is
    64-bit amd64 kernel modules. I think this means its a 32-bit OS anybody help when can i download 64bit?

    It isn't clear to me why you think you have a 32-bit system but there is one potential source of confusion that I can think of. A 64-bit Solaris system has a 64-bit kernel and drivers and is fully capable of running both 32 and 64 bit binaries; however, most of the system binaries are still 32 bit. So if you run "file /usr/bin/ls" you'll see a 32-bit executable even on a 64 bit system.
    If isainfo tells you it is a 64-bit system it is - even if most of the system binaries are compiled in 32 bit mode.

  • Panic: on Solaris 7 64 bit

    Ppl,
    Mandar here. With the same problem of driver crashing on Solaris 7 64 bit. To just refresh you on whats happening.. i am developing a driver for a network device, under Solaris 7 for ultra sparc. This is a 32 bit PCI device. i am seeing a system crash while allocating dma resources. I have compiled the driver using -xarch=v9 for making it 64 bit. I could map device registers, add intr but the dma resource allocation crashes. My driver shares memory with the device. I tried to use, ddi_dma_alloc_handle followed by ddi_dma_mem_alloc and then ddi_dma_addr_bind_handle. The first two calls succeed without any problem.. the system crashes in the third call. I tried this, another way, using ddi_iopb_alloc followed by ddi_dma_addr_setup.. then i see the crash in ddi_dma_addr_setup
    I had just kept this aside for a while, as I found that these same dma resource allocation sequences worked well on Solris 7 32 bit. So I proceeded with my 32 bit driver. This driver is now done, and running well. i got back to the problem on 64 bit. It is persisting. tried a lot of things.. but no success.. tried to plug the device in a 64 bit pci slot , link the driver using ld from /usr/ccs/bin/sparcv9/ld.. nothing rally works.
    does anybody know, what the problem can be? Big diff, is the sequence works on 32 bit and crashes on 64 bit..
    Looking forward to some help..
    Thanks,
    Mandar

    Hi,
    There are no 64 bit static "system" libraries supplied with Solaris 7.
    So there is no question of linking them with the executable.
    You may create your own 64 bit static library and link with the executable.
    Thanks
    Kalpesh

  • Solaris 9 32-bit application 256 descriptors

    Hi,
    There is a bug in Solaris, a 32-bit application running on 64-bit Solaris cannot open more than 256 descriptors. I read the article from Giri Mandalika http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/stdio_256.html. There is a solution for Solaris 10 described in that article. Is there any solution for Solaris 9? Was that solution backported to Solaris 9?
    Any hint is appreciated.
    Tomas

    Hello.
    This limitation is not a limitation of the Solaris operating system but of the libc library.
    A simple workaround could be:
    FILE *myfiles[1000];
    int i;
    // won't work if more than 256 files are open...
    for(i=0;i<1000;i++) myfiles=fopen(names[i],"w");
    for(i=0;i<1000;i++) fprintf(myfiles[i],"%u\n",i);
    Workaround - NOT TESTED:FILE *f;
    int myfiles[1000];
    int i;
    for(i=0;i<1000;i++) myfiles[i]=creat(names[i],0644);
    for(i=0;i<1000;i++)
    f=fdopen(dup(myfiles[i]),"w");
    fprintf(f,"%u\n",i);
    // fclose() will only close the handle duplicate returned by dup() !!
    fclose(f);
    -- EDIT --
    Tested on Solaris 9/Sparc:
    - You have to use "ulimit -n" to allow an application to use more than 256 file descriptors (maximum is 1024).
    - If more than 256 files are open "dup" and "dup2" will cause an SIGSEGV - obviously a bug in Solaris.
      Maybe you can use the following combination instead of using "fprintf":len=sprintf(buffer,...);
    write(file[i],buffer,len);
      I'm not sure if "write" etc. cause SIGSEGVs when more than 256 files are open.
    Martin                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • After rebooting my Windows Vista 64 bit system, could not access iTunes; after uninstalling I tried reinstalling, but it has been running for more than 24 hrs. Should I cancel installation?

    I had been updating my Windows Vista 64 bit system and as a result of a problem, had to reboot my system. Afterwards, I was no longer able to access iTunes.  I got a message stating that there was a problem with some of the files associated with the application.  A phone rep at Apple's Customer Service provided me with emails linking instructions on completely uninstalling and reinstalling iTunes. I did the uninstall, then checked for lingering iTunes files and couldn't completely remove some, but tried intalling the latest version of iTunes. It has been running for roughly 24 hours.  The status bar is green all the way across, and when I try to cancel, I get the following message: "Are you sure you want to cancel iTunes installation?"  I keep hitting "no," but am staring to wonder if there is a problem with the install.  Should it take this long if I have roughly 134 gigs of music?  I can still see the music in my computer's C drive, so I am worried that there is an error, perhpas because I didn't clear out all the lingering C:\Program Files\Common Files\Apple\ and all the lingering C:\Program Files\iTunes\.  Any thoughts?

    It is not just the HP. I have 3 HP computes and 2 Dell computers. 2 of the HP and 1 Dell suffer the iTunes internet block. Took me a while to figure it out also. But, the one thing that is different on the Dell, is that I can leave iTunes installed and not open it and everything works. As soon as I open it, internet access goes down. BUT secure sites (https:) works fine.

  • Having a problem with wireless connection. On my Windows XP 32 bit system and a 6510 printer, initi

    On my Dell Latitude D620, Windows XP 32 bit system and my 6510 printer wireless connection (Linksys EA4500) , everything works fine after the computer is booted.  After a period of time (usually overnight), I lose connection to the printer (the scanner icon with a red x is shown on my Windows task bar and I can't print.  Ran Windows Fix and the HP fix programs.  The only thing that solves it is to reboot the computer.  A second symptom is that my IE8 stops connecting to the internet at the same time (gives a 'waiting for' response that never changes).  Firefox still connects OK when this is happening.  So I suspect the problem isn't with the printer, but with my Windows set up.  It is a fresh XP SP3 install (hard drive crashed, but it happened before also).  I reset IE, checked my proxy, no malware, happens with or without firewalls and security programs.
    Hoping that someone else has run into this problem.  Been all over Google, and the IE doesn't work / Firefox works is fairly common, but none of the fixes helps. 

    If you want you can reload Firefox 4.0 or the last "old" version is 3.6.16 and is available here:
    http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html
    Just reinstall your choice of FF. The bookmarks are in a different directory and are NOT overwritten. Some of the Add-ons that worked in 3.6 DO NOT work with 4.0, pay attention and head any warnings when you start 4.0.
    I had to disable extensions: Flashblock and WOT
    Firefox SafeMode? - A troubleshooting mode.
    1.You can open the Firefox 4.0 SafeMode by holding the Shft key when you use the Firefox desktop or Start menu shortcut.
    To exit the Firefox Safe Mode, just close Firefox and wait a few seconds before using the Firefox shortcut to open it again.
    For more help, see this: http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes
    Hope this helps you out.
    Feedback is appreciated especially if this helps you out.

  • Unable to install iTunes 10.5.0.142 on Windows 7 64 bits system

    I am not able to install the latest version of itunes, version 10.5.0.142, released by Apple last week.
    I think it is important to note that there are three pending updates on my system (Windows 7, 64 bit), which keep on failing again and again no matter what the mode of update (manual via microsoft website or automatic via the program provided by microsoft). These are:
    1. Security Update for Windows 7 for x64-based Systems (KB2556532)
    2. Security Update for Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Service Pack 1 Redistributable Package (KB2538242)
    3. Security Update for Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Service Pack 1 Redistributable Package (KB2538243)
    The methods that I have tried to install the latest version of itunes (all have failed as of now):
    a. Automatic via the previous version of itunes. This tries to download and install itunes in parts, but ultimately leads to the error originally pointed in this thread. Failed.
    b. Uninstalling the previous version of itunes completely as mentioned here: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1923 and also using Microsoft Fixit and then trying to install the new version. Failed.
    c. Uninstalling all but apple software update, and then trying to update manually from the software update file available in c:\Program Files (x86)\Apple Software Update folder. Failed.
    d. Uninstalling all the versions of visual c++ (2005 and 2008), and then trying to install the latest version of itunes. Then re-installing the latest versions of c++ (2005, 2008 and 2010) along with updates but three as pointed above, and then trying to install the latest version of itunes. Failed.
    e. I have tried various permutations and combinations of keeping the firewall, antivirus and even the internet off and on. Failed.
    The combination of errors that I have received:
    - An error occurred during the installation of assembly ‘Microsoft.VC80.CRT,version=“8.0.50727.6195″,type=“win32,publicKeyToken=“1fc8b3 b9a1e18e3b”,processorArchitecture=“x86”. Please refer to Help and Support for more information. HRESULT: 0x80073712
    - Error 7 indicating installation of microsoft .net framework 4.0 for me (http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3074) and
    - Error 2 - "Apple Application Support was not found. Apple Application Support is required to run iTunes. Please uninstall iTunes, then install iTunes again. Error 2 (Windows error 2)
    However, I have seen on some websites that people have been able to install the latest version of itunes on their windows 7 64 bits system (surprising, but yeah).
    I would appreciate any pointers as to:
    ?1 How do I install the latest version of itunes on my system.
    ?2 If the steps are not included in the solution to ?1, how do I update 1., 2., and 3. mentioned above.
    ?3 If I am able to install itunes 10.5.0.142 on my windows 7 64 bit, would I be able to successfully my iPad2 to iOS5?
    Many thanks.

    I should have posted this earlier, but anyway. I restored my laptop to factory version after backing up any useful data, and the first thing I the laptop was restored was connect to the internet, download and install the latest version of iTunes. And Bingo! It worked.
    Apple helps you find Original Sin with the Windows.

  • Java plugin not working on any browser (64-bit system)

    Hi there!
    I'm having a major problem with running Java plugin on all of my browsers (Opera, Chromium and Firefox) under my Arch Linux 64-bit system. The system is fully up-to-date, and Java plugin is being displayed among other plugins on "about:plugins" screen. The Java Environment was installed from Community
    [zbyszek@barca ~]$ yaourt -Qs jre
    community/jre 6u24-1
    Sun/Oracle's Java Runtime Environment
    Any ideas how to solve this?

    Hi,
    Maybe (just maybe, dont shoot me afterwards ) this link can help:
    http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/linux-amd64.html#java-sun
    Thor

  • WIndows 7 64-bit system printing to a Windows 2000 server configured as a print server

    Is there any way to configure a new Windows 7 64-bit computer to use a Windows 2000 server configured as a print server ?
    The printer that I would like to connect to is an HP 4240n LaserJet. I appears that there is only a 64-bit Universal Print Driver available. The server currently uses HP 32-bit PCL5e or PCL6 drivers for all other connected computers. Connection is through a Hewlett-Packard Network Port, using DLC/LLC transport for the embedded 4240n print server.  
    Installing  the HP 64-bit UPD to the WIndows 7 64-bit system, and then attempting to redirect the local port to the Win2k network print server has not worked.
    Thanks for any advice.

    Hi:
    See if this works...
    Run msconfig.
    In the System Configuration screen, Boot tab, Advanced Options, if there is a check mark in the box next to Maximum memory. Remove that checkmark and save your changes.
    Reboot and hopefully Windows recognises all the Ram ( minus the reserved ) after restarting.
    Please give that a try, and post back and let us know if that frees up some system memory for you.
    Paul

  • How do I retrieve a hWnd required to draw an image created by an ActiveX object on a windows 7 64-bit system?

    I'm calling to the NaturalPoint Optitrack SDK using activex controls and am trying to pull tracking data from a trackIR 5.  I have connected to the camera and wanted to start by just viewing a captured frame.  The Optitrack COM provides a function to draw the frame, but needs a hWnd handle for a window to draw to.  I tried to call FindWindow from the user32.dll, but only found FindWindowA, FindWindowExA, FindWindowW, and FindWindowExW.  I'm using Labview 8.6 (32-bit) on a Windows 7 64 bit system (trying to figure out how access the universities liscense manger to install LV2010 64 bit).  Thanks
    Jarad

    The other functions are variants, depending on how you're dealing with strings:
    FindWindowW : Unicode names
    FindWindowA: ANSI names
    FindWindowEx: Searches child windows for the window that has the specified name. You can provide a parent window handle as a starting point. The "A" and "W" follow the same Unicode/ANSI names as FindWindow.
    You'd want to use FindWindowA or FindWindowExA since LabVIEW doesn't support Unicode.

  • Crystal Reports XI R2 SP2 on Windows Server 2008 ( 32 bit system)

    Hi Forum,
    I am trying to run a .NET application on a windows server 2008( 32 bit system) with Crystal Reports X1 R2 SP2 installed.
    The application does not run and throws the following error in the event log.
    Faulting application w3wp.exe, version 7.0.6002.18005, time stamp 0x49e023cf, faulting module unknown, version 0.0.0.0, time stamp 0x00000000, exception code 0xc0000005, fault offset 0x0171ab98, process id 0x%9, application start time 0x%10.
    The same application runs fine on a windows server 2003.Also, the same application runs fine, when i remove the crystal reports code. It loads the .NET pages fine.
    Please suggest me if i am missing something. Please let me know how can i debug this issue?

    Hello,
    Crystal reports XIR2 is not supported on Windows server 2008.
    Check the supporting platforms guide here.
    [Crystal Reports XI Release 2 SP2 - Supported Platform Info|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/boc/index?rid=/library/uuid/7081b21c-911e-2b10-678e-fe062159b453]
    Thanks,
    Bhushan.

  • Will photos created on a 32 bit Windows Vista Home Premium be readable on a Windows 7 64 bit system?

    I have around 25,000 photos in jpeg and tiff and in version sets plus some slide shows and blurb books created in the 32 bit system of Windows Vista Home Premium with PSE 10.0 and Premier and have to change to a 64 bit  Windows 7  system since Adobe is discontinuing the Photoshop Elements programs in early April of 2013. Will these photos created in 32 bit be readable and editable in the 64 bit system?

    Yes. PSE works on both 32bit and 64 bit systems.
    PSE is not being discontinued. The on-line service at Photoshop.com is simply moving to Adobe Revel.

Maybe you are looking for