Solaris on Intel

Does Weblogic work on Solaris 8 on Intel architecture ?!

Hello
I tried on Solaris 8 on IA and it dies an ugly death. I assume that you want
to set
the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /weblogic/lib/solaris??
Narayanan Iyer
Intel Corporation
"Michael Girdley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
It should work fine because we are completely Java.
However, it is not officially supported. The platform support page for
WebLogic Server is located at:
http://www.weblogic.com/platforms/index.html
This page has the latest and greatest information on the platforms that
WebLogic is certified and supported on.
Thanks,
Michael
Michael Girdley
BEA Systems Inc
"Div" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:399c3511$[email protected]..
Does Weblogic work on Solaris 8 on Intel architecture ?!

Similar Messages

Problem about D-link card installation on Solaris 8 intel

hello,
I don't know how to install my ethernet card on the Solaris 8 intel.
It's a D-link DFE-530TX model on PCI bus.
Could you send my the methode to install it.
Thank you very much.

Hi,
refer this URL http://sun.drydog.com/faq/s86faq.html.
(Note: question - 6.7)
revert back.
Thanks.
regards,
senthilkumar
SUN - DTS

How to Install Solaris for Intel so that it boots off from a boot floppy?

Hi all,
Sorry to bother you with this one (I went through all documentations/manuals and could not find straight answers to following
specific questions):
I have one hard drive with 1st partition used by Windows XP and a second partition that's a blank FAT 32 (using Partition Magic)
I want to use for Solaris for Intel.
My very specific questions:
(1)That blank Fat32 partition: can I run the Solaris install over it ..or should I absolutely make sure that it's a blank UFS formatted
partition? I am asking you that because all manuals (except one) pretend that I can run my Solaris install on a blank Fat partition...
but I believe that documentation at multiboot.solaris-x86.org stresses that if the partition is not a blank UFS one, it wont install Solaris
(2)As you already know, some Oses like Linux or FreeBSD can be installed on a partition and be booted off a boot floppy.
So without that boot floppy, no trace of the OS. How can I do that with Solaris for Intel. I want my Solaris to boot off a boot floppy only.
BTW, I currently have Solaris 7 for Intel.
Thanks for the answers.

(1)That blank Fat32 partition: can I run the Solaris install over it ..or should I absolutely make sure that it's a blank UFS formatted You can install Solaris to that blank FAT32 drive but Solaris WILL convert it to UFS BEFORE doing the install. In other words, after the install it will be UFS and not FAT32 anymore.
So without that boot floppy, no trace of the OS. How can I do that with Solaris for Intel. I want my Solaris to boot off a boot floppy only.Not that I know of. Some people have reported booting Solaris off of a USB drive though.
alan

Building mod_jk module on Solaris 10 (Intel Platform)

Hi,
I am trying to build a mod_jk module on a Sun Blade 1500 (Solaris 10 Intel Platform). I downloaded the most recent tomcat connector I could find (jakarta-tomcat-connectors-current-src.tar.gz) and have attempted to build it, but I have received the following error:
Making all in common
/bin/bash /var/apache2/build/libtool silent mode=compile gcc -I/usr/apache2/include -g -O2 -O -xarch=386 -xchip=pentium -xspace -Xa -xildoff -DSSL_EXPERIMENTAL -DSSL_ENGINE -DHAVE_APR -I/usr/share/src/apache2/srclib/apr/include -I/usr/share/src/apache2/srclib/apr-util/include -g -O2 -DSOLARIS2=10 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REENTRANT -I /include -I /include/ -c jk_ajp12_worker.c -o jk_ajp12_worker.lo
gcc: unrecognized option `-Xa'
gcc: unrecognized option `-KPIC'
gcc: language ildoff not recognized
gcc: jk_ajp12_worker.c: linker input file unused because linking not done
mv: cannot access .libs/jk_ajp12_worker.lo
*** Error code 2
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `jk_ajp12_worker.lo'
Current working directory /tomcat-connect/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-1.2.15-src/jk/native/common
*** Error code 1
The following command caused the error:
set fnord $MAKEFLAGS; amf=$2; \
dot_seen=no; \
target=`echo all-recursive | sed s/-recursive//`; \
list='common apache-2.0'; for subdir in $list; do \
echo "Making $target in $subdir"; \
if test "$subdir" = "."; then \
dot_seen=yes; \
local_target="$target-am"; \
else \
local_target="$target"; \
fi; \
(cd $subdir && make $local_target) \
|| case "$amf" in *=*) exit 1;; k) fail=yes;; *) exit 1;; esac; \
done; \
if test "$dot_seen" = "no"; then \
make "$target-am" || exit 1; \
fi; test -z "$fail"
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all-recursive'
Anyone have any idea what the problem may be?

I'm not familiar with what you are trying to accomplish,
I'm more of a hardware person, but...
Sun Blade 1500 systems are NOT x86 architecture.
They are UltraSPARC-IIIi systems.
Could that be contributing to what you see?
SB1500(Silver) in the SSH
SB1500(Red) in the SSH

Solaris 8 Intel 10/00 Install problem

When I boot with the Install CD (Solaris 8 Software 1/2),
in the next screen of install:
Select the type of instllation you want yo perform:
1 Solaris Interactive
2 Custom Jumpstart
After selecting one of the two options it appears the next error:
Booting kernel/unix...
do_relocate: bad strndx 3275
do_relocations:/kernel/genunix do_relocated failed
Krtld:error during initial bad/link phase
P.D Im using the Solaris 8 Intel 10/00 booting from CD.
In fact, If I use the Solaris 8 Installation CD theres is no problem on booting the kernel from the CD.
Any Idea?
Thanks.

Kalpesh - do you work in support? Most users don't have the luxury
of spare media or systems to experiment with:-)
Perhaps the original poster could tell us the exact HW config so
others can offer suggestions?

How do I create an Image of my Solaris 10 (Intel) server?

I'm currently running Solaris 10 (Intel) on a Dell PowerEdge 2650. I'd like to create an Image of the server now that I have all the extra software installed and configured correctly.
I used Symantec Ghost for my Window based servers, does anyone have any suggestions for the best method/software to do the same for my Solaris servers? Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks

Using dd is about the most hideous thing to do since restoring the data will cause you much grief. The best approach would be to use the 'ufsdump' command. You can easily dump your slices into files, and perform either full or interactive restores.
Better yet; whenever you get a bigger disk you won't be wasting space (or risk corrupting data) through the use of dd. Next to data the dd command would also restore the partition table, boot sector, etc. And thats not very good if the disks differ too much.

Interval Timing Issue On Solaris 10/Intel

Not sure this is the right forum for this, but I'll give it a shot. Please redirect me if you think there's a better forum. This is going to look like a "C" problem, but this really is a question about something going on in the interactions between the operating system, the JVM, and a piece of native code we have.
We have an interval timing facility that's implemented over a small set of platform-dependent native timing facilities. The *NIX "itimer" facility is used wherever it exists. On RedHat/Fedora we also implement a timer over the RTC device. On Windows we use a WaitableTimer.
On all platforms there's a Java class that bridges to an appropriate timing facility via the JNI, and to date this has worked great on all platforms except for Solaris 10 on Intel. By "worked great" I mean that the clock tics end up being almost exactly what we expect for a given configured Hz update rate. So... e.g. if we set up a timer for 50 Hz, then we actually get 50 Hz +/- some minor variation much less than 1 second.
On Solaris 10/Intel we set up a 50 Hz itimer in a plain-vanilla C app and we get ~50 Hz, but if we call the same C code from Java via the JNI we almost always end up with ~38Hz.
The amount of Java and native code involved is almost trivial, and the hardware is a smoking fast contemporary PC. We ran over the itimer facility on an old Sparc 5 box and it worked fine.
I've tried tweeking sundry esoteric -X and -XX JVM invocation options with no effect.
J2SDK 1.4.2-07 in all cases.
Thoughts?

I'd think you should be posting in the forum for the Solaris 10 os, not a Java forum. Maybe someone in the Java Native Methods forum would have the necessary Solaris 10 expertise, also.
If you do post elsewhere, either close this out with a final post or put a reference(s) to any other posts and say where you want replies posted, so replies aren't needlessly duplicated.

Interval Timing Issue On Solaris 10/Intel When The JNI Is Involved

We've observed an odd behavior bridging to interval timers over the JNI on Solaris 10/Intel, and I was wondering if anybody here has ever seen anything like this.
We have an interval timing facility that's implemented over a small set of platform-dependent native timing facilities. The *NIX "itimer" facility is used wherever it exists. On RedHat/Fedora we also implement a timer over the RTC device. On Windows we use a WaitableTimer.
On all platforms there's a Java class that bridges to an appropriate timing facility via the JNI, and to date this has worked great on all platforms except for Solaris 10 on Intel. By "worked great" I mean that the clock tics end up being almost exactly what we expect for a given configured Hz update rate. So... e.g. if we set up a timer for 50 Hz, then we actually get 50 Hz +/- some minor variation much less than 1 second.
On Solaris 10/Intel we set up a 50 Hz itimer in a plain-vanilla C app and we get ~50 Hz, but if we call the same C code from Java via the JNI we almost always end up with ~38Hz.
The amount of Java and native code involved is almost trivial, and the hardware is a smoking fast contemporary PC. We ran over the itimer facility on an old Sparc 5 box and it worked fine.
I've tried tweeking sundry esoteric -X and -XX JVM invocation options with no effect.
J2SDK 1.4.2-07 in all cases.
Thoughts?

I'd think you should be posting in the forum for the Solaris 10 os, not a Java forum. Maybe someone in the Java Native Methods forum would have the necessary Solaris 10 expertise, also.
If you do post elsewhere, either close this out with a final post or put a reference(s) to any other posts and say where you want replies posted, so replies aren't needlessly duplicated.

CAN I INSTALL SOLARIS 10 INTEL PLATFORM ON MY PC

Can anybody guide me whether i can install solaris 10 intel platform on my pc having following configuration
1. Processor = AMD SEMPRON 2500+ 64-BIT.
2. MainBoard = ASUS K8V-MX.
3. RAM-= 512 MB DDR PC3200
4. Display = Onboard VIA/S3G Unichrome Pro IGP.
5. LAN = Onboard VIA RHINE II Fast Ethernet Adapter.
6. Monitor = 17" LG CRT, Model = Studioworks 700S
7. Sony DVD- ROM.
8. Samsung DVD-RW.
9. HDD = 40 GB Samsung 7200 RPM.
If anybody knows let me know at my e-mail [email protected]

I don't think you will have many problems in this platform, but I'm not 100% sure.
What I recommend you is to get the VMWare and try there. VMWare is a software where you can create a virtual machine running under windows. In this virtual machine you could install solaris 10 (and any other OS you want to test in your computer). I have my Solaris 10 running under VMWare with excellent results (Laptop with Intel Celeron processor)... where I have VMWare installed in Windows!

Oracle 8i and Solaris For intel

Hi All
I need Your Help please
I am trying to install oracle 8.1.7.0 at sun Solaris for Intel
when I Run the /install/Solaris/runInstaller
it's tell me please wait and the gave me this error
arg list too long <----------------This is the Problem
when I check Metal link Support I Found A topic tell me the reason for this error is:-
E2BIG Arg list too long
The argument list passed to the exec command
is longer than the limit
allowed in the operating system.
but my Unix Kernel Parameters is :
I add this parameter at ------> /etc/system
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=4294967295
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmin=1
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=100
set shmsys:shminfo_sshmseg=10
set semsys:seminfo_semmni=100
set semsys:seminfo_semmsl=100
set semsys:seminfo_semmns=110
set semsys:seminfo_semopm=100
set semsys:seminfo_semvmx=32767
Notes :
this is the Default Values From the Installation Guide R2 for Solaris Intel
My Environment Variable is:
I add this Parameters at -----------------> .profile for oracle user
umask 022
DISPLAY=ksolaris:0.0
ORACLE_HOME=/home/oracle/u01/app/oracle/product/8.1.6
ORACLE_BASE=/home/oracle/u01/app/oracle
NLS_LANG=AMERICAN_AMERICA.WE8ISO08859P1
ORA_NLS33=$ORACLE_HOME/ocommon/nls/admin/data
ORACLE_SID=WORLD
ORACLE_DOC=/home/oracle/u01/Docs
TMPDIR=/var/tmp
PATH=$ORACLE_HOME/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/css/bin:.
Notes :
I think there is some thing Wrong at DISPLAY Parameter
the Machine that I will Install Oracle at it it's name is Ksolaris
My Device Configuration Is :
P4 1.7
Ram 128
Swap 650
Please Help me And tell me How I Can Fix this message arg list too long
think youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

If u r going to install oracle for Solaris (inetl based) then obviously u have to download oracle of solaris version..

Oracle 9i on Solaris 9 Intel

Does Oracle have plans to release the 9i database on Solaris 9 (Intel)?
Thanks,
--Brandon

See here
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/certify/certify.istore_welcome
Nicolas.

Oracle 9i for solaris 8(intel x86 platform)

I want to know that if oracle for sun solaris 8 (intel platform) is available and anyone has installed it. On OTN only oracle for sun solaris (For SPARC ) is available for download.
if anyone know it for solaris 8 (intel platform) then please tell me where to get it from.
rohit
[email protected]
So that we may better diagnose DOWNLOAD problems, please provide the following information.
- Server name
- Filename
- Date/Time
- Browser + Version
- O/S + Version
- Error Msg

This forum is for Forms questions. You should ask your question on the appropriate forum.
Regards,
Robin Zimmermann
Forms Product Management

Portal on Solaris 8 Intel

Hi.
Anyone been able to install Portal 1.0.2.1 on Solaris 8 for
Intel. I have a 8.1.7.1 database installed. I did all the
settings recommend in the installation manual before starting
the installation.
The installation stops at round 56% with the following being
written to the log:
@ INSTALL_ACTION: STEP 12:ssoPasswordStore() : ../../bin/sqlplus
portal30_sso_PS/portal30_sso_PS@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=
(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=T
@ CP)(HOST=ashome.us.oracle.com)(PORT=1521)))(CONNECT_DATA=
(SID=orcl)))
@../../portal30/admin/plsql/sso/ssopssyn.sql portal30_sso
SQL*Plus: Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production on Tue Oct 23 10:07:12
2001
@ (c) Copyright 2000 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
ERROR:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12261], [], [], [],
Thanks
Kjetil

Hi,
I feel like laughing....JAVA MUST work on SOLARIS...bcoz both are from same company
the GREAT SUN MICROSYS.
Well Solaris on INTEL does have a problem but obviously not with JAVA......just uninstall/remove all the directories of Java from source....and reinstall fresh latest copy....
Hope it helps,
Cheers,
Manja

Solaris 8 Intel can't wee whole drive :(

Hello!!
I have a problem. Solaris 8 Intel can't see whole IDE hard drive. This is the IBM drive IC35L040AVER07
on Inter DeskTop motherboard model D815EEA2. I tried to upgrade BIOS to the last version but it's still doesnt work :( It' showes 7GB only but in fact this drive has 40Gb capacity. How can I correct this problem?
With best regards, Pavel

Just label the drive and that should do it.

Can't find gunzip on Solaris 7 intel

I'm sure this is a total newbie problem, but I can't find gunzip for Solaris 7 intel. I've searched my hard drive, and I can't find it. I've even installed the entire distribution. What am I doing wrong?
Mike Hillwig
[email protected]

Mike:
gunzip is not a part of the distribution.
Download gzip from www.sunfreeware.com and install.
George

Solaris 8 - Intel

Hello,
I know this is not the right forum to ask this question,
but most of the unix gurus using this forum will have a
answer.
I installed solaris 8(intel) on a PII box, will the
technet oracle software(like 9iASr2, 9iDBR2) will
work in intel version of solaris 8, even though
they are labelled for Sparc Solaris.
I thought of saving time before trying to install.
Thank You.
Srini Sundar

Sparc is a different processor architecture than x86. I.e.
opcodes are different --> Sparc binaries will not run on
an intel box.
HTH
Marcus Geselle

Solaris on Intel

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for