Solaris & Veritas File System

Hi folks,
Does anyone know where to find Veritas File System--Solaris support matrix?
Which of VxFS versions support ACLs on Solaris?

Hi,
Support matrix: http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/234176.htm
ACLs are supported for VxFS => 3.2, see http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/181401.htm

Similar Messages

Solaris 10:unable to mount a solaris root file system

Hi All,
I am trying to install Solaris 10 X86 on a Proliant DL385 Server it has a Smart array 6i, I have download the driver from the HP web site, on booting up the installation CD 1, adding the device driver, it sees the device but now says it can��t mount the device. Any clues what I need to do?
Screen Output:
Unable to mount a Solaris root file system from the device
DISK: Target 0, Bios primary drive - device 0x80
on Smart Array 6i Controller on Board PCI bus 2, at Dev 4
Error message from mount::
/pci@0,0/pci1022,7450@7/pcie11,4091@4/cmdk@0,0:a: can't open - no vtoc
any assistence would be appreciated.

Hi,
I read the Message 591 (Agu 2003) and the problem is quite the same. A brief description: I have aLaptop ASUS with HDD1 60GB and a USB storage HDD (in next HDD2) 100GB. I installed Solaris 10 x86 on HDD2 (partition c2t0d0s0). At the end of installation I removed the DVD and using BIOS features I switched the boot to HDD2. All ok; I received the SUN Blue Screen and I choose the active Solaris option; but at the beginning of the boot I received the following error message
Screen Output:
Unable to mount a Solaris root file system from the device
DISK: Target 0: IC25N060 ATMR04-0 on Board ....
Error message from mount::
/pci@0,0/pci-ide2,5/ide@1/cmdk@0,0:a: can't open
any assistence would be appreciated.
Regards

Solaris Virtual File System

Have Solaris virtual file system been changed since Solaris 2.5.1? How much?

AFAIK, the VFS is not an official (and documented) interface
and may change from solaris release to solaris release
(perhaps even with a new kernel patch).
Other, you can probably get the Solaris 8 Foundation Source,
and use it as the definitive reference documentation ;-)

Solaris 10 - File System Size / Layout

Hello, I�m very new to Solaris OS � UNIX world and have a question around the file system.
I have SUN System with a single 36GB of Hard Disk, and eventually I want to install Oracle 10g on it as a development server for myself.
My question is around the file system size and layout
I have installed Solaris 10 and accepted the default file system, which is as below:
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0 5.0G 3.4G 1.6G 69% /
/devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 1.5G 1.1M 1.5G 1% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object
/platform/sun4u-us3/lib/libc_psr/libc_psr_hwcap1.so.1 5.0G 3.4G 1.6G 69% /platform/sun4u-us3/lib/libc_psr.so.1
/platform/sun4u-us3/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr/libc_psr_hwcap1.so.1 5.0G 3.4G 1.6G 69% /platform/sun4u-us3/lib/sparcv9/libc_psr.so.1
fd 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev/fd
swap 1.5G 136K 1.5G 1% /tmp
swap 1.5G 88K 1.5G 1% /var/run
/dev/dsk/c1t1d0s7 28G 28M 28G 1% /export/home
What I don�t understand is when I eventually install Oracle, where will the directory go for it?
The /home/export folder is aprrox: 28GB which is now taking up most of the space, and I understand that this is for users, therefore my question is:
1.Should I have allocated a more space to the root file system for oracle during the OS install?
2. If so what should I do? (its not a production system and I know it will have to go somewhere on the single drive, I�m happy to rebuild as I�m still learning the OS).
Any suggestions?
Rgds
D

Thanks, I do have this but needed info on the file system layout... but I have the info now...
If you select the auto file system layout on Solaris 10 then it gives the remaining space to the home/export . I have since re-installed, customised the file system layout and have space for the database.
D

SOlaris 10 file system UFS

Hello All.
I'mnot able to mount ufs on optical disk that have 8192 block size if the kernel pagesize is less then 8192. Our driver that manage UDO disk is able to work properly on Sparc with UFS but not on AMD.
Is there any possibility to use UFS on AMD with 8192 block size ?

We are trying to implement ufs on 8192 block size
optical media and we already succed using Solaris
8/9/10 on sparc architecture where PAGESIZE is 8192.
We have our private SCSI driver to pilot optical disk
but no problem, UFS works fine, we simply specify
fragsize=8192 during newfs.
If we do the same on AMD where the PAGESIZE is 4192
we get no error during write but file cannot be read
back. It seems that UFS failes because the PAGESIZE <
Physical block size.I see what you're saying. Yes, I think you'll have problems with trying to make UFS work on a system where pagesize < phys block size.
Sorry for the initial misunderstanding. I have no suggestions for how you might overcome that, or how much code makes that assumption.
Darren

Solaris File System/ Virtual File system Documentation

can anybody help me in finding solaris virtual file system documentaion/books ?
thanks in advance,
-mayur

AFAIK, the VFS is not an official (and documented) interface
and may change from solaris release to solaris release
(perhaps even with a new kernel patch).
Other, you can probably get the Solaris 8 Foundation Source,
and use it as the definitive reference documentation ;-)

Single node file system to 3 node rac and asm migration

hi,
we have several utl_file and external table applications running on 10.2 single node veritas file system. and we want to migrate to 3 node RAC ASM environment. what is the best practices in order to succeed this migration during this migration. thanks.

1. Patch to 10.2.0.3 or 10.2.0.4 if not already there.
2. Dump Veritas from any future consideration.
3. Build and validate the new RAC environment and then plug in your data using transportable tablespaces.
Do not expect the first part of step 3 to work perfectly the first time if you do not have experience building RAC clusters.
This means have appropriate hardware in place for perfecting your skills.
Be sure, too, that you are not trying to do this with blade or 1U servers. You need a minimum of 2U servers to be able
to plug in sufficient hardware to have redundant paths to storage and for cache fusion and public access (a minimum of 6 ports).
And don't let any network admin try to convince you that they can virtualize the network paths: They can not do so successfully
for RAC.

Virtual File System : vfs_freevfs function

Does anybody know anything about Solaris virtual file system function "vfs_freevfs" from vfsops struct from
vfs.h. Thanks,Veselka

vfs_freevfs is callback which gets called when a file system is unmounted to release (free up) the resources held by the file system.
Saurabh Mishra

Solaris 10 - After installation read only file system

Dear All,
I have installed the Solaris 10 on my x86 system with out any problem. The installation was completed successfully. I have followed the installation instructions that are mentioned in the following link.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0544/6mgbagb19?a=view
I am facing a different problem. I am not able to create even a single file / sub-directory on any of the existing directories. It always says READ ONLY file system can not create firl / directory.
Please help me how to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Srinivas G

What do you get for 'svcs -xv' output?
Darren

How to determine the file system on Solaris

Friends,
How to determine which file system I have installed UFS or ZFS on Solaris
Thanks

Other methods would include looking at the /etc/vfstab if it's in there or fstyp(1M):
System Administration Commands fstyp(1M)
NAME
fstyp - determine file system type
SYNOPSIS
fstyp [-a | -v] special [:logical-drive]

How so I protect my root file system? - x86 solaris 10 - zfs data pools

Hello all:
I'm new to ZFS and am trying to understand it better before I start building a new file server. I'm looking for a low cost file server for smaller projects I support and would like to use the ZFS capabilities. If I install Solaris 10 on a x86 platform and add a bunch of drives to it to create a zpool (raidz), how do I protect my root filesystem? The files in the ZFS file system are well protected, but what about my operating system files down in the root ufs filesystem? If the root filesystem gets corrupted, do I lose the zfs filesystem too? or can I independantly rebuild the root filesystem and just remount the zfs filesystem? Should I install solaris 10 on a mirrored set of drives? Can the root filesystem be zfs too? I'd like to be able to use a fairly simple PC to do this, perhaps one that doesn't have built in raid. I'm not looking for 10 terabytes of storage, maybe just four 500gb sata disks connected into a raidz zpool.
thanks,

patrickez wrote:
If I install Solaris 10 on a x86 platform and add a bunch of drives to it to create a zpool (raidz), how do I protect my root filesystem?Solaris 10 doesn't yet support ZFS for a root filesystem, but it is working in some OpenSolaris distributions.
You could use Sun Volume Manager to create a mirror for your root filesystem.
The files in the ZFS file system are well protected, but what about my operating system files down in the root ufs filesystem? If the root filesystem gets corrupted, do I lose the zfs filesystem too?No. They're separate filesystems.
or can I independantly rebuild the root filesystem and just remount the zfs filesystem? Yes. (Actually, you can import the ZFS pool you created).
Should I install solaris 10 on a mirrored set of drives?If you have one, that would work as well.
Can the root filesystem be zfs too?Not currently in Solaris 10. The initial root support in OpenSolaris will require the root pool be only a single disk or mirrors. No striping, no raidz.
Darren

Unbootable Solaris 10 x86 installed on ZFS root file system

Hi all,
I have unbootable Solaris 10 x86 installed on ZFS root file system. on an IDE HDD
The bios keep showing the msg
DISK BOOT FAILURE , PLEASE INSERT SYSTEM BOOT DISK
please note :
1- the HDD is connected properly and recognized by the system
2- GRUB don't show any messages
is there any guide to recover the system , or detail procedure to boot system again
Thanks,,,

It's not clear if this is a recently installed system that is refusing to boot OR if the system was working fine and crashed.
If it's the former, I would suggest you check the BIOS settings to make sure it's booting from the right hard disk. In any case, the Solaris 10 installation should have writting the GRUB stage1 and stage2 blocks to the beginning of the disk.
If the system crashed and is refusing to boot, you can try to boot from a Solaris 10 installation DVD. Choose the single user shell option and see if it can find your system. You should be able to use format/devfsadm/etc to do the actual troubleshooting. If your disk is still responding, try a `zpool import` to see if there is any data that ZFS can recognize (it usually has many backup uberblocks and disk labels scattered around the disk).

How do you expand a file system on Solaris 10 that is running as a LDOM on Solaris 11

I'm somewhat new to Solaris but needing to expand an existing file system /work on our solaris 10 ldom that was P2V'd into a Solaris 11.2 environment. I also have several additional questions that I can't seem to find an answer for anywhere.
When trying to expand the disk device using the "format" command, when you get to the partition and it asks you to "Enter partition size(147456b, 2c, 3891e, 72.00mb, 0.07g]:" what does the "b" "c" "e" sizes indicate and why and when would you use them? It seems that you would want to always just add size based on MB or GB?
When trying to use "growfs" after I increased a partition on a disk, I get error devinfo: /dev/dsk/c0d0s7: Inappropriate ioctl for device, growfs: cannot get partition size. What step have I missed?

Matt--
One suggestion: if you can't figure out how to put a file system on the empty space, you could clone your current partition to an external drive, re-partition the internal drive drive and then clone the external back. Like John, I've heard of utilities that can re-partition a drive without erasing your data, but I just can't imagine using one if I didn't have a clone anyway. So that's what I've done when I want to change a partition size.
charlie

Udfs file system on Solaris 10

hello all,
cannot find the limit of udfs file system on solaris 10.
Which is the med a block size that can be used ?
ANy chance to create udfs on 8192 block size media ?
Thanks
Aldo

First check the mkfs_udfs((1M) manualpage, it displays some information regarding this. Next you may benefit from the fsdb_udfs(1M) command to display certain options. But with regards to blocksize and the likes the first manpage should do.

Sun QFS cluster file system with Veritas Volume Manager

Hi,
Can someone confirm whether it is possible to create a Sun QFS cluster file system (for Oracle RAC datafiles) using a VxVM volume?
Or must we use Solaris Volume Manager with QFS?
Thinking of storing the static part of the Oracle RAC DB on VxVM raw devices, and the dynamic part on a QFS file system to avoid the overhead of constantly adding new raw devices when i want to create datafiles.
Thanks,
Steve

Steve,
No, shared QFS is only supported on Solaris Volume Manager. I've not heard of any plans to test it on VxVM.
Why not keep the static parts of the DB on raw SVM devices? Why keep them on raw devices at all?
Tim
---

Solaris & Veritas File System

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for