Solaris10 on V240 and RAID System Transtec Provigo 410

Hi,
does anybody have a clue how i can install the external raidsystem Provigo 410 from transtec into solaris 10?
I connected it via fc and iscsi with a V240 and get the messages in the format :
FC:
1. c3t230000A0D1E171F8d0 <drive type unknown>
/pci@1f,700000/pci@0/fibre-channel@2/fp@0,0/ssd@w230000a0d1e171f8,0
ISCSI:
1. c3t6d0 <drive type unknown>
/iscsi/[email protected]%3A01.00a0d1e1720604D2,2
The controller of this raid is a Rasiliant, Typ RAS-6000.
The raid runs perfect with Win2k3 and linux and the vendor told me to ask Sun to get it started ...
Can anyone please please help me?

Hmm.
no need to search anymore. Verndor told me, that Solaris 10 is not supported with this raid ... shame on them :-)

Similar Messages

Problem with fibre channel card and raid system after upgrading to 10.4.7

Hello, I have a problem with our Xserve G4 DP. After the installation of 10.4.7 everything works fine exept our fibre channel card. This card is connected to a Hitachi Raid System which worked fine over a year. But after the update the volume was no longer mounted. I even reinstalled the server to 10.4.4 and no sign of our raid volume. Using the apple fibre channel utiltiy 2.0, I see that there is a connection - but still the raid volume is not mounted. When I restart the server the lights on the back of the card are shortly flickering and sending some packets to the raid system but that´s all. Has anybody an idea?
Greetings from Heidelberg
Klaus
Xserve G4 DP 1 GHz Mac OS X (10.4.6) Mac OSX Server 10.4.7

You could re-update, by downloading the 10.4.7 Combination Updater from Apple.

Solaris 9 and RAID systems

hello!
i'm having problem with my solaris 9 can somebody pls help me.
actually I have this raid subsystems attached to my sun blade 1500 machine through an fiber channel hba from emulex...when I try to check the disk on my raid ( I have set multiple luns on my raid), it seems solaris 9 cant recognize them all. only lun0 was recognize... i already installed the driver ( version 6.01f) coming from emulex for solaris os... I counter-checked this problem to solaris 10...still the same...what shall I do?

I already have that:
name="sd" class="scsi" class_prop="atapi"
     target=0 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi" class_prop="atapi"
     target=1 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi" class_prop="atapi"
     target=2 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi" class_prop="atapi"
     target=3 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
     target=4 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
     target=5 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
     target=6 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
     target=8 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
     target=9 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
     target=10 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
     target=11 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
     target=12 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
     target=13 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
     target=14 lun=0;
name="sd" class="scsi"
     target=15 lun=0;
I also have this:
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=0;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=1;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=2;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=3;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=4;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=5;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=6;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=7;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=8;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=9;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=10;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=11;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=12;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=13;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=14;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=15;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=16;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=17;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=18;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=19;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=20;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=21;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=22;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=23;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=24;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=25;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=26;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=27;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=28;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=29;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=30;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=31;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=32;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=33;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=34;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=35;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=36;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=37;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=38;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=39;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=40;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=41;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=42;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=43;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=44;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=45;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=46;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=47;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=48;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=49;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=50;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=51;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=52;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=53;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=54;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=55;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=56;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=57;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=58;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=59;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=60;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=61;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=62;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=16 lun=63;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=17 lun=0;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=17 lun=1;
name="sd" parent="lpfc" target=17 lun=2;
what does solaris 9 uses as a target id? in solaris 8 i have no problem...my sd.conf in sol8 is also the same...

2 servers and one raid system

HI All,
I've connected two servers, each a different controller, to one LUN of a raid system. All the raid disks (except the spare) are put together inside 1 LUN.
Now I think I remember that this is not a good idea. Can someone explain to me why this is bad (or not) ?
Thanks in advance
Luca

Look for clustering on the forum or rather scsi-initiator-id.

How to: make one or two partions at a raid system?

Hey
how can i make one or more a partions at a raid system?
i will make the partions at a 250gb raid. one with 120gb for the bootsector, and the other for documents, etc.
is there a hwo to anywhere? dont find one?
please read my second question.... 2 raids at one mac pro?
regarads

O.K., i was looking the hole day to get that partions on a raid working.
to make the partions on each HD with the same volume, this is no problem. when you then create the first raid, works fine. but when you make the second raid, you get a massage, that this raid is not found.
then you see both raids at the disc utilty, but only at the first you seen the volumen down under, by the second not. the first works, the second is not avabiele.
so, now i have only one big mirrowed raid for my boot sector, and its runs fast, quick and without big noise... thats what i want, and the second big raid for my files.
2 raids at one mac pro with 4 hd. one with 2 x 250 gb hd for the bootsector, and the other with 2 x 500gb for files
thx to all, and you kappy
regards

Windows 7 on mac mini server and raid 1

I just purchased a 2011 mac mini server with the hopes of installing windows 7 alongside lion. Then my goal was to have the two drives mirrored. I successfully mirrored the two drives using disk utility and then proceeded to install lion. This all went fine. Imagine my shock when I loaded up bootcamp to see an error message describing it's inability to install windows on a raided system. The thought hadn't even occured to me that this would be an issue.
I have searched through various forums and other places on the internet and haven't found a solution. I am curious if I can get anyone with any experience in this area. Is it possible to have mac and windows installed on a drive... and have that drive mirrored to the second drive... regardless of what os i'm booted into?
Thanks for your help guys

The GUI version of Disk Utility is very limited in what sort of RAID configurations you can create. It will only allow you to have a single partition on the disk and to make a RAID using that.
Boot Camp requires creating additional partitions on the disk and hence it complaining.
There is a commandline version of Disk Utility called diskutility (duh!). It has far more options available. Details for this command can be obtained by typing man diskutility in Terminal.app.
It appears that in theory you might be able to do the following.
Start off with both disks not setup for RAID
Use Boot Camp to create the Windows partition. Repeat this on each disk.
Then in Terminal.app manually convert the boot Mac partition to a RAID using diskutil appleraid enable
Then add the matching partition on the second drive to make it a working mirror using diskutil appleraid add
Then in Terminal.app manually create a RAID for the Windows partition using both drives and use FAT32 as the format using diskutil appleraid create
Then boot and run the Windows installer and tell it to erase the Windows partition as NTFS
I cannot gurantee the above will work and you should obviously have backups if needed. Another option would be to have the Mac partition covered by RAID but not the Windows partition, this would result in three volumes one Mac RAIDed volume, and two other non RAIDed volumes even though you have two physical disks.

Macbook Pro: How do I set up a RAID system?

Macbook Pro: How do I set up a RAID system on a MACBOOK PRO properly?
Can I have the OS on the same drives or does it need to be seperate?
I mostly want to do this becuase I am having a lot of problems with the "spinning ball of death" and slow speeds. I have my RAM maxed out at 6Gigs and my 7200rpm 750GB HD is about half full.
Am I correct in trying to do an external RAID Drive to help with speed?
If yes, what is the best way to do this and which type of connection (USB, Firewire, etc) is best to use?
Thanks!

Edward House
Edward House
Am I correct in trying to do an external RAID Drive to help with speed?
No
Why is my computer slow?

Advice on RAID Sets, Volume Sets, and RAID Levels of the Volume Sets using an Areca Controller

I have read through a lot of information on disk usage, storage rules for an editing rig, users inquiries/member responses in this forum and I thank each and every one of you – especially Harm.
In building my new workstation, I purchased five (5) WD 1T, 7k, 64M SATAIII hard drives and an Areca RAID card, ARC-1880ix-16-4G, which I plan to use primarily as my media/data disk array. The workstation will use a 128GB SATAIII SSD as the OS/program drive and I will transfer two (2) WD Raptor/10k SATA 70GB drives from my current system for pagefile/scratch/render use. I tentatively plan on using a mobo SATAIII port for the SSD and mobo SATA ports with a software RAID (level 0) for the 10k Raptors.
In reading the Areca Instruction manual, I am now considering exactly how I should configure the 5 physical 1TB drives in terms of RAID Level(s), Volume Sets, and RAID Sets. I must admit that I like the opportunity of allowing for a Dedicated Hot Spare as I am generally distrustful of the MTBF data that drive vendors tout and have the bad experience in the past of losing data from a mal-configured RAID array and a single drive hardware failure (admittedly, my fault!).
In line with the logic that one doesn’t want to perform disk reading while trying to write at the same time (or vice-versa), I am thinking the approach above should work OK in using the mobo disk interface and both software and external hardware RAID controllers without having to create separate RAID level configurations within a Volume Set or further dividing up the physical drives into separate RAID sets. I know in forum messages that Harm noted that he had 17 drives and I could envision a benefit to having separate RAID sets in that situation, but I am not at that point yet.
To some degree I think it might be best to just create one RAID Level on one Volume Set on one RAID Set, but want to solicit thoughts from veteran controller users on their workflows/thoughts in these regards.
Anyone care to share thoughts/perspectives? Thanks
Bill

Thanks for the speedy feedback Harm - I appreciate it.
I was thinking RAID level 3 as well.
Of course, it's always something! I purchased the Caviar Blacks by mistake - which are non-TLER. I will work with EggHead to return the ones I purchased and replace them with RE4 versions as I'm not thrilled about the possibility of the controller declaring the volume/disks degraded unnecessarily and although I have the DOS utility WDTLER where one is supposed to be able to enable/disable TLER on WD drives - I suspect WD is way beyond that now anyway with current builds.
I agree with you about just testing the performance of the options for the raptors - on the mobo and then on the controller. When I benchmark them I'll post the results in case others are curious.
Thanks again....off to EggHead!

How to install the driver of the 'SCSI and RAID Host Controller'

Hi,
I have two Windows XP(32Bit) installations:
•Windows XP SP2(32Bit) which is old and it seems as if it is infected by some viruses.
•I have installed another fresh clean Windows XP(32Bit) SP3. However, I have found that there is no category named with ''SCSI and RAID Host Controller'. However, when checking out the old version of Windows XP, I found 'SCSI and RAID Host Controller'
is there. (Screen shot below)
The new Windows XP(32Bit) SP3, there is no 'SCSI and RAID Host Controller'
My motherboard is:
My Desktop Computer(Intel P 4, 512MB of RAM, and Graphics Card with 256MB of RAM.
]I am seeing that most computer doesn't has the scsi / raid controller . in the old Windows XP on my computer that SCSI and RAID controller exists, and it it has not a yellow mark on it.
When I installed a new windwos XP 32Bit SP3, no SCSI/RAID in divice manager .
My computer sound on new Windows XP doesn't work , however, on old Windows XP SP2 works well. I have a buitl-in sound card. SCSI and RAID controller category in the device manager on the old Windows xp SP2 is realted to sound card,I don't think.
Thus, What drivers would let the 'SCSI and RAID Host Controller' added in the device manager?
A man should convert his anger and sadness into strength to continue living in this life.

If you open the case and shine a light on the motherboard you can usually see both the manufacturers name and the model printed on the pcb somewhere. You should also normally see this information on the first POST screen when you turn on the PC.
Otherwise Google "775i65G" like I did.
Here are the driver downloads (assuming it is an Asrock 775i65G R2.0 and not an R3.0)
http://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/775i65G%20R2.0/?cat=Download&os=XP
You should install the inf driver first. Hopefully after you do that you will see your desired listing in Device Manager.
With regard to the AMR driver and the HDMR driver, you can find some information about these here :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio/modem_riser
Unless you actually have something plugged into these risers, it is probably not necessary to install the drivers.
However, the drivers for the integrated C-Media audio chip and the Realtek Lan chip may prove useful.
It looks like the motherboard has integrated video but if you are using a graphics card it will not normally be necessary to install the VGA driver.
You can download both the manual and the installation guide here
http://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/775i65G/?cat=Manual
And if "SCSI and RAID Host Controller" is still not shown in Device Manager, don't worry - because these functions are not supported by your motherboard (again assuming it is an Asrock 775i65G)
Thanks a lot,
First of all, when saying that I have multi-operationgs systems, I mean there are two operating systems installed on my PC(SP2, SP3) both are 32Bit. The first Windows SP2(NOT installed by me) has all multimedia audio card installed
well, and has SCSI and RAID Host Controller shown the device manager. However, only the VGA is not installed on Windows SP2. However, the second one Windows SP3(Installed by me) has VGA not installed, Multimedia audio NOT installed, and there is no SCSI and
RAID Host Controller in device manager.
First: Why did the CPUz, specy didn't detect motherboard name, and only detect the model. IF I need to open the case and shine a light on the motherboard you can usually see both the manufacturers name and the model printed on
the pcb somewhere, then what benfit would be there from hardware detection software?
Second: Yes, my motherboard has integrated video, and integrated audio card
However, this doesn't mean that I don't need to install them since the Vidoe controller is not properly installed (it is a default VGA ) Also, Multimedia audio controller is not functiong at all.
Finally: if And if "SCSI and RAID Host Controller" is still not shown in Device Manager in Windows XP SP3, because these functions are not supported by my motherboard, then why is 'SCSI and RAID Host
Controller' installed/shown in the device manger in Windows XP SP2 on the same PC???
A man should convert his anger and sadness into strength to continue living in this life.

Do I need a RAID system or just a larger external hard drive

Hi guys... I am working in my fathers company and running the media side of our small business. I do our website, print media and also our video production....
I have an iMac and it is running on 500gig of storage and 8meg of RAM.... I have almost filled up my hard drive and I am looking into to getting into to doing a lot more video work....
I need more storage, but I am not sure whether to invest in a RAID system or should I just get an external hard drive...
At what point is a RAID worth the investment ?
Thanks guys
Harrison

RAID provides a level of redundacy should one of the hard drives in the array fail.
I would only invest in RAID if you are able to support the RAID array and understand its limitations.
Remember RAID is not backup. Don't be complacent about backup.
A larger hard disk is simplier to manage than a RAID array.
As with any mission critical data, you need a robust backup strategy.

Problems Installing RAID System

This is my first attempt at building a RAID system and I'm having a bit of trouble. I'd like to install Arch on one hard drive and then create a RAID-5 array using several 1TB drives I have lying around. The RAID array will only be used for storage--the operating system will be on its own drive. I'm planning on using the RAID controller on my motherboard (Abit IP35 Pro), which I believe provides hardware RAID support (someone please correct me if this is wrong).
From what I've read, it sounds like the best way to get this set up is by installing the operating system first and later adding in the disks and creating the RAID array. The steps I've taken so far are as follows:
1) Remove all disks except for the one I'll be using for the operating system.
2) Go into BIOS and set SATA mode to "RAID"
3) Install Arch
Arch gets installed just fine, but when I try to boot into it, I get a kernel panic with the following error message:
/init: export: line 63: : bad variable name
Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 2.6.36-ARCH #1
Call Trace:
If I go into the BIOS and change the SATA mode back to "AHCI," then Arch boots up just fine.
I've found a lot of documentation on installing software raid/fake raid systems, but I haven't found much on configuring Arch for hardware raid. I've also seen the documentation on dmraid which looks like it might work for me, but I believe that is a software solution and I'd like to take advantage of my hardware controller if possible.
Can anyone else share some insight? Thanks all and Merry Christmas!

i think its fake raid not hardware raid.

2nd HD and RAID

I recently purchased a Pavilion p6510y (4 months ago) which came with a SATA 720 GB HD configured as RAID. I added a SATA WD 80GB (WD800AAJS) to be used as a backup. Worked fine for a few weeks then when I rebooted the screen came up with BOOTMNGR cannot be found press CTRL-ALT-DEL to reboot. Did this several times with same results. Tech support didn't help too much. I started disconnecting devices one at a time and it finally came down to the 2nd HD. Once disconnected all is fine. Is there a way of adding a 2nd HD without this happening again. Is it something to do with RAID - not familiar too much with RAID. Motherboard is an ALOE with 6 SATA connectors and an AMD x4 CPU.
Thanks in advance
Dwight
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hello deweymitch, It seems your system has the AMD Raid Utility. I am not familuar at all with this Raid Utility, as a matter of fact, this is the first time I have seen it. After going to the specifications for your system and doing a little research, it appears the the 750GB hard drive is listed as
1:MAS <Main HD> Assignment: LD 1-1 This listing appears to refer to this drive as Logical Drive (LD) 1-1, which I assume is Logical Drive 1-partition1. 3:MAS <2nd HD> Assignment <Single Disk> shows the second hard drive.
HD 1 shows everything normal (RAID ready) This means that this drive can be added to a second hard drive of the same capacity to create a Raid 0 or Raid1 array. This normally cannot be done in a conventional Raid setup with out loosing all the data on the drive, but it appears tha AMD can accomplish this by migrating the data on the drive to the other newer added drive for a Raid array. Shows nothing for 2nd HD would suggest this drive could not be added to another drive to create a Raid array. It does appear that the MBR may have become corrupted when you got the error. If the system is now booting to the desktop from the 750GB hard drive, with the 80GB drive attached and recognized, I would insure there is no data on the 80 GB drive that I needed and enter the Control Panel, Administrative Tools, Computer Management, Storage, Disk Management, and locate the 80 GB drive and delete the partition on this drive. Then create a New Volume, give the New Volume a name that you would recognize such as Western Digital 80 GB, or something of this nature, format it in NTFS, let the system assign a drive Lable letter. This would repair the MBR if it were corrupted. Close all the Windows, and copy and paste any data that you had backed up from the 80 GB drive.
As I mentioned earlier, I am not familuar with the AMD Raid Utility, but since you do not have enough drives on your system for a Raid array, I would not be concerned about Raid unless you continue to have issues with the drives. Many HP systems are shipped with Raid enabled in the BIOS. I am not sure why HP does this on a single hard drive system, but HP does sell systems with Raid arrays set up on two hards drives when shipped.
Raid arrays do have a place in computers, especially in Servers. I have used Raid arrays for over 15 years on all my homebuilt systems, and to be honest, I now see no purpose for a Raid system for normal home use. The use of Raid arrays can be a little complicated since Raid can be configured in many configurations, for different purposes. Raid is a technology in a league all it's own, so if you don't keep up with the changes in Raid, it's best not to try and use it. For the normal home user it appears to have no benefit. Just to put your mind at ease, just because you see the Raid Utility appear on your screen does not mean you are using a Raid array system, but just that the Raid controller is enabled on your system.
Please click the White Kudos star on the left, to say thanks.
Please mark Accept As Solution if it solves your problem.

Making 2 Raid Systems on 1 Machine

G5 Dual 2.5gig PPC
This may be a little more technical then this board can handle as it was asked on different thead with plenty of looks but no suggestions, so i'll try here and hope more knowledge lives in this part of town.
How to?
I have a Raid 0 (striped) and set up on 4 internal drives.
I have a Sonnet Tempo-X esata 4+4 board.
It allows you to set up 4 internal drives as a raid 0 and 4 drives externally in a SATA enclosure as a Raid.
That would be 2 seperate Raid Systems.
The Problem is Disc Utilities in 10.3.9 won't allow building a second 2nd raid.
I know in 10.4 it will but I DO NOT WANT 10.4 on the system.
Does anyone out there know what to do here? or how to do this?
Thanks

Alright... so now
I see my other computer "iMac" in the Finders Window of the laptop
It makes me connect to the system which is always has in the past.
I opened the External HD up for sharing within the File Sharing under systems properties.
If I wanted to move something from my, Say "Desktop" into the external hard drive will I continually need to log onto the iMac and move the file to the hard drive which is now available.
I figured that the External HD would just constantly show under shared devices on my laptop at all times considering it's a shared device.
Still not certain that I have all aspects correct. I've even went under the "side window" of the share devices and made certain that EX HD's are checked for viewing.

Replace the Hot Spare that Shared between Raid 1 and raid 5

I have ProLiant ML370 G6 with Smart Array P410i Controller on System Board
I have two Logical Drive (Logical Drive 1 - Mirroring (RAID 1) And (Logical Drive 2 - Distributed Data Guarding (RAID 5)
The logical Drive 1- Mirroring (RAID 1) Have two Physical Drives
The Logical Drive 2 Distributed Data Guarding (RAID 5 Have three Physical Drives
And There Are One Spare Drive Shared btween RAID 1 and Raid 5
Controller Configuration Summary
2 Data Array(s)
2 Data Logical Drive(s)
5 Data Drive(s)
1 Spare Drive(s)
The problem :
there are that the spare Drive FAil and have warining To replace it
I replace this drive with new one but the repulid for the Drive not start and Give Inactive
How Repulid the Hot Spare drive ?

Hello Amostafa,
Welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience! To help you get the most out of the HP Forums I would like to direct your attention to the HP Forums Guide First Time Here? Learn How to Post and More.
I understand that you are looking to rebuild the hot spare drive on your ProLiant system, and I would be happy to guide you towards a resolution!
I am sorry, but to get your issue more exposure, I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums, since this is a commercial product. You can do this at:
http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/ProLiant-Servers-ML-DL-SL/bd-p/itrc-264
I hope this helps!
Regards
MechPilot
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!

PP Crashing when opening collected project from a RAID system on a single drive system

Hello,
I have a very serious problem with Premiere Pro. I've created a project in Premiere Pro CC on a Windows 7 system, utilizing a RAID system.
Today I collected the project from that machine to an external HDD in order to transfer the project to my computer, running Premiere Pro CC 2014 on Windows 8.1 - no RAID configuration, just a single HDD. After converting the project to CC 2014, Premiere Pro crashes and has to close.
I believe there's a bug/problem/issue with transferring RAID projects to non-RAID machines in general, since a collaborator of mine had the exact same problem with the exact same project file (and a bunch of other project files that essentially were previous versions of the project file I have a problem with).
Is there any explanation to this? And probably any fix?
Thanks!

What could be in my project that makes it unable to open?

Solaris10 on V240 and RAID System Transtec Provigo 410

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for