Sold to party is not taking while licencse processing in deemed export

Dear all
i am having a problem in   licence  processing creating  in deemed export
when i want to enter the sold to party and ship to party in  J1ilic01  screen the system is showing  invalid sold - to - party and ship - to - party
what will be the problem  i cannot able to creat  a  lic value for the customer 
i have maintained the  excise details also

Thanks all 
As per lakshmipathi i tried it is coming  i had zero's in front the system is taking
sorry for the dely in reply and adding points
thanks

Similar Messages

  • SP ( Sold to Party )is not in table

    Hi
    This is Srikanth Can Some help me when i am creating a customer master with the account group 0001 after completing all the required fields  when want to save the record i am getting an error as Sp Sold to party is not table XXXX like that only for all these SH,BP PY.

    Hi,
    In VBPA table you will get the PARTNER FUNCTIONS of the SALES DOCUMENT
    Goto VBPA table with the VBELN number which is Sales document number , then check the PARVW field for the required Partner function
    The Partner functions maintained in the CUSTOMER MASTER are available in KNVP table
    There will be difference you can find between these two table if any thing added manually during processing of sales order.
    Hope it is clear,
    regards,
    santosh

  • Err.Sold-to party 1 not mainted for sales area EL01 01 01

    Hello SAP Gurus
    I am trying to save a quote from an external application using .NET connector which calls the bapi 'BAPI_QUOTATION_CREATEFROMDATA2'.
    I am getting back an error 
    E        VP     197       Sold-to party 1 not mainted for sales area EL01 01 01 .
    I am trying to search for this error on all SAP related areas and am not able to find anything that answers my question.
    Any feedback will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Ram

    >
    Ram Prasad wrote:
    > Fortunately or unfortunately I am the only SAP guy in my company and I am actually certified in XI and but am wearing different caps at different time.
    ..Exactly You remind me my early career of SAP,I was the Only Person In My project,No matters it was kind of Support one,But i had been asked to handle some Tedious Asset Accounting isses-Some how i servived and turn the things around me,And Believe me The Stuff i learnt in such tiny 7 month is far More than i learnt my rest of my Life.
    Fortunately~

  • Timer not expired while running process

    Dear All
    I'm using timer to blink the text message in 6i forms.Its working fine.
    But the problem is while running process timer not expired.
    If there is any solution to expire timer while running process, please let me know
    Thanking you

    As I understood you want to expire the timer in a specific time.
    you can call SET-TIMER with NO_REPEAT Indicates that the timer should not repeat upon expiration, but is to be used once only, until explicitly called again.
    You can call it every time that you want

  • Start of cycle date is not taking while scheduling

    Hi
    I have created a maintainance plan with scheduling indicator TIME and scheduling period 365 days . I am giving start of cycle date as 04-02-2011 but while scheduling the plan it is taking 19-02-2011 as first plan date . my maintainance plan cycle is 15 days.
    I want that date as 04-02-2011 . how can I get that.
    Regards
    Kumar

    The system is working fine. Once you decide the start cycle date then first plan /Order will come only after the cycle duration from the start cycle date. You can put 15 day before date from 4-2-2011. then you will get first call on desired date.
    Raj

  • Open item not found while doing process open items - F-32

    The customer account shows 2 open items ( 1 Invoice and 1 Payment documents) during account clearing with f-32 t.code, only payment document is appearing. whether reason code maintained in invoice document any way afftects in account clearing process.

    check the posting date of the invoice and payment.
    You can enter more, go to edit, select more.
    Has one of the entries got a special GL entry.
    Lastly if all else fails, on the selection screen enter both document numbers.
    If only one appears, make sure it has not been cleared already.

  • Fiscal year 2010 Not allowed while creating Process order in COR1

    Dear Friends,
    We have gone SAP live in the month of October. The fiscal yeat we are using is 2011 as the client is Indian client. I have made the fiscal year variant for 2011 (V3). The FI document posting with Fiscal year 2011. It is also creating the Controlling document and Profit center document without any problem.
    We have also made the period open as 2011 in MMpv and MMRV. The goods receipts is working fine and the finance entry and material document gets generated for the fiscal year 2011.
    Now we are creating the process order in COR1 and getting the error message Fiscal year 2010 not allowed as below.
    Fiscal year 2010 is not allowed
    Message no. F5568
    Diagnosis
    The fiscal year entered (2010) is different from the fiscal year derived from the posting date and fiscal year variant (2011).
    System Response
    Error.
    Procedure
    Correct the fiscal year entered.
    In KP26 we have maintianed for activity price for 2010 &  2011 and the system is picking the data for the fiscal year 2010 data and not the FY 2011 data.
    I have checked in OKEQ (Costing version '0') The valide start date for FY2011 is 01.04.2010.
    Is there any other place to maintain the fiscal year in Controlling area or Prodduction Planning???
    I last my patient last 5 days doing R&D. Can any one help me where the fiscal year is picking and why it is picking FY 2010??
    Regards,
    Devendran

    Hi Ajay,
    Thank you for your comments. I have checked the Factory calendar and that is 2010 (January to December). We have tried to change to 2011 but the system automatically picking the date from January 1st 2011 to 31st December 2011. I am unable to create calendar year with date from 01.04.2010.
    I have discussed with my PP consultant about this issue, he is telling the factory calendar nowhere related to Fiscal year. Do you have any idea how to change the factory calendar of 2011 from 01.04.2010 to 31.03.2011??  Is there any there reason why my system considering the Fiscal year 2010 instead of 2011???
    Your inputs will defenitely help me to get an clue.
    Regards,
    Devendran

  • Mozilla Thunderbird Portable installed on Surface 3 Pro worked a few times but now does not open while the process overheats the system. why?

    years of data in the installation (4GB);
    Surface 3 Pro with i7 8GB RAM and 256GB SSD
    the process is visible in Task Manager and absorbs around 35% of CPU time but no window is opened.
    It looks like a bug but without the interface window it's impossible to do any update.

    If you can manage to launch TB, it may be a matter of disabling graphics hardware acceleration.
    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1039540

  • Sold-to-party not getting updated

    Hi
    we are trnasferring  outboud deliveries from system A to system B. in system a the delivery is with reference to order and when it comes to B we have custom delivery type which without order reference. we are using BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CREATENOREF to transfer the delivery. all the data is updated correctly but the sold-to-party is not updated. In fact in the FM there is not import parameter for entering sold-to-party.
    In system B we tried to create a delivery without order reference using the same ship to party , in this case the sold-to-party is picked up by the system automatically. So when only replicating with the BAPI the sold-to-party is not picked up automatically. How do i update the sold-to-party. is there any FM to do this??
    thanks
    sankar

    Take a look at the OSS note 1069352 - it won't solve the issue but might explain something.
    Try using EXTENSION_OUT / EXTENSION_IN to add sold-to. Otherwise you might have to use something different. E.g. FM BAPI_DELIVERYPROCESSING_EXEC technically allows creating the deliveries in a scenario that you're describing:
    The preceding document can be in another system. To ensure that the entire requested quantity is generated in the delivering system and the corresponding requirements are planned in the planning system, for example, for cross-system deliveries SAP recommends creating unchecked deliveries (techn_control-check_mode = 'A').
    There are also IDocs for deliveries. Hope this helps...

  • Invoice list based on sold to party not

    Hi all,
    As per my client requirement, Sold to party is one only but there will be different bill to party & Payer.
    Only one main sold to party is paying all bills generated on behalf of different payer. The reason to make payer is, client wants accountability on payer wise. So sold to party is one & different payer.
    Now Ii require to raise a invoice list based on sold to party wise not payer or bill to party wise.
    Invoice list getting spillted because of different partner.
    How to do that.
    Please suggest me as soon as possible.
    Thanks
    Shobhit

    Hi Shobhit
    To meet your requirement  you need to go with a enhancement then your requirement will be fulfilled. So you need to discuss with your Technical team also regarding this issue
    Thanks and Regards
    Srinath

  • Ship to party,Bill to party, payer, sold to party not shown in partners Tab

    Hi,
    Kindly note that Ship to party,Bill to party, payer, sold to party not shown in partners Tab.
    Eventhough SP,SH,BP,PY are assigned to customer KU only.
    And we have assigned Partner Functions ot account Group.
    Still Ship to party,Bill to party, payer, sold to party not shown in partners Tab
    Please help.
    Regards,
    Rajkumar.C

    Hi
    Please check the following setting once again in spro > sales and distribution > baisc function > partner determination > For customer master
    1. check for partner determination procedure AG , if you have created a new one then please check whether it is there in the list.
    2.Select the AG and then check for whether the partner function has been made mandatory in the procedure or not.
    tick mark  SP, BP,SH,PY , since Sold to party should not be allowed to change so mark it as Not Modifable
    3. partner determination procedure assingment for the account group. AG should be assinged to your account group
    4. Account Group Function assingment - Make sure your all the partner function SP,BP.PY.SH has been assinged to the Account group here.
    Thanks
    RB

  • MB56-sold to party field value is not appearing

    Hi,
    In MB56 - Batch where used list report, there is no data flowing for sold-to-party field. Sales order is displayed and delivery also performed for the same. But, still there is no sold-to-party data.
    Mean while, it shows sold-to-party value against some STO transactions in MB56.
    Kindly help me out to solve this problem.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Sudhar

    Hi Sudhar,
        Just change the Layout, you should see the Outbound Delivery/Sales Order/Sold-to-Party information.
    Thanks

  • Sold-to-party cannot be changed

    I have created a sales order with SP ...0001 now i want to change the SP to 0002
    .both 0001 and 0002have different sales area.It doesnot allow 001 to be changed
    Why a sales area for a sold-to-party is not redetermined?
    What factors restrict it?

    Hi Nikhil,
    If I have correctly understood your question, then you mean to ask why the Sales Area is not redetermined in the Sales Order, when you try enter the different Sold to party.
    Firstly, as soon as you save the Sales Order, the Sold to Party field becomes greyed out ( Non ediatable).
    Secondly, the sales area is mandatory data at the Initial selection screen while creating the Sales Order. The Sales area is not determined from the Sold to party. It is the other way round. The Sold to party is checked, whether it is of the same Sales Area, as you have entered in the initial screen.
    I hope this input will help you understand the logic better.
    Regards,

  • Partner determination sold to party and ship to party.

    Hi frnds,
      Currently in the customer master in partner function we are maintaining ship to party the same as sold to party , now for some of the customer the ship to party and sold to party are different , so while creating a sales when i enter the sold to party , the system propose the ship to party and on that basis the delivery and billing should take place.
    What are the configuration settings required to be done to this , i will maintain the ship to party in customer master partner determaination, but when i create the sales order and when i enter the sold to party , it should propse the ship

    Hi  Rakesh,
    As per SAP standard setting ship to party will be determined from Sold to party master , if that is maintained. I suggest to copy Standard and test again.
    Also ,hope you have not made any changes to the partner determination procedure fro Sales Document at header Level. This will also impact .
    Sharing a few useful link for more clarity :--
    http://www.freesaptutorial.com/partner-determination-in-sap-sd/
    Re: Ship-to party is not assigned to a sold-to party
    http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/sd/steps-for-partner-determination-config-in-img.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40/helpdata/en/3c/92ecee484a11d5980800a0c9306667/content.htm
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Snippets/howtogetship-topartyforasoldto+party
    Thanks/Rajesh

  • Sold-To Party and Reported missing when doing Help - Create Support Message

    Sorry, I know this has been asked multiple times, but I'm missing something in the responses.  The responses I am finding either don't seem to apply to my situation, or aren't detailed enough to explain what I'm supposed to be doing.
    Solution Manager 7.0 EhP1 SAPKITL435.
    If we try to do a "Help - Create Support Message" from within our production Solution Manager system, the "Reported by" field is correct, but the Sold-To Party is blank.
    If we try to do a "Help - Create Support Message" from within our non-production Solution Manager system, both the "Reported by" and  Sold-To Party fields are blank.
    If we try to do a Help - Create Support Message" from another SAP system whose RFC is pointing to our non-production Solution Manager system, both the "Reported by" and  Sold-To Party fields are blank.
    I've looked at IB52, as well as the SPRO activities under "Partner Determination Procedure."  I think a big part of my problem is that they just don'e make sense to me yet, because I can't figure out what I should be changing.
    For example, IB52 looks to me like it only applies if you want to assign something to the same person all the time.  Am I missing something there, or is that an answer to a different question?
    I also can't figure out if I need to create something new in "Define Access Sequences," or modify something existing, and, if I modify, to what?
    Does anyone know where I could find specific instructions for setting this up?

    Hi Brenda,
    Regargind this issue, please check if Sold-To party is maintained for
    your system with IB52 in your solman system as the steps below:
    SOLUTION MANAGER system
    ->IB52
    ->select the system on left hand side
    ->click on 'goto' on top menu
    ->Select 'partner'
    ->Now maintain Sold-To party
    Also check below note:
    1165357    Sold-to-Party is not assigned to Service Desk messa
    As you said ou already assigned then i would request you to please check if you have assigned at the system level or not. Somtimes people define at top of the tree and also at system level. Please assign at system level and delete all other. Most of the times this is the issue Sold-to-party doesnt fill automatically.
    For reported by field:
    Please check the note: 824640: Customizing missing for Service Desk in Solution
    read this note carefull and this will help you fixing the reported by issue.
    Please, make sure you have applied the following corrections:
    1439191 Incident Create: Message Reporter or Processor is not saved
    1486132 Incident Create: Enhance search help of Reporter field
    1497700 Work center: Message details not updated after refresh
    After this if you still having issue you need to provide more details but i think this will fix the issue.
    Thanks
    Regards
    Vikram

Maybe you are looking for