Sold-to, Ship-to xreference problem

Hi Experts,
I'm sending two E1EDKA1 segments Sold-to(AG), ship-to(WE) with external customer# information. and added 2 entries(SP, SH) in EDPAR table with customer(SAP) and ExternalPartner#.
But at the runtime it's not being converted into SAP customer#.
could any body help to resolve this.
Arjun

Hi Ravi,
Thank you for the answer.
It's Inbound 850 message coming to SAP. If you take it off, how you are going to convert external customer to SAP customer# and EDPAR entries.
Arjun

Similar Messages

Block sold to ship field

Hi!
   I would like to Know, if is it possible to block sold to ship field in VA01. We have many sales order with the sold-to party different to the sold-to ship and in this sales document the sold to ship sould be the same that sold to party.
   The customer database is Ok. The problem is in VA01, the sales person entry in the same one customer code in sold to party and other code in sold to ship.
   Is it possible we block or create a pop-up to check this?
Best regards
Julio César

In Partner Determination Procedure for Sales Document Header, check the box "Not Modifiable" for SH. But what will happen if users change at item level. For that, you need to go with user exit.
G. Lakshmipathi

Changing Sold-to/Ship-to of a sales order causing delivery priority 0.

Hi Epts,
While Changing the sales order (VA02)'s sold-to /ship-to party then delivery priority changing from 6 to 0.(Delivery priority changes to initail value).
Analyzed the standard program SAPMV45A and found the subroutine (FV45PFAP_VBAP_FUELLEN_KUAGV) in which the delivery priority is getting changed. But i am unable to find the user exit which will causing the problem.
Regards,
Beeru.

If u r wishing to change the sold to party for a particular item it means u r not selling that item to him. U cant have 2 different sold to parties in a single sales order.. U can change other partner functions at sales order level but not sold to party partner function....
U can assign reason for rejection to close this particular order and raise a fresh order in favor of the sold to party u wish to for that particular item...
Message was edited by:
srinivas rao

SD Partner Function other than "Sold To, Ship To etc.."

Hello BI fam,
What is the best approach in extracting additional partner funtion in SD (ex: Contacts, External Buyer) with mostly created with "Z" other than your usual suspects (Ship to, Sold To etc.). We are attempting to query reports with total sales by External Sales person. All are being extracted via standard cubes from SAP.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
EG

he is regular customer with account group 0001,
intresting point is that with the same account group (0001),for some customers it showing sold to,ship to(in sales order),but for some customers (for some orders) it not showing sold to ,ship to.
Edited by: raja kumar reddy on Jun 22, 2010 11:00 PM
Edited by: raja kumar reddy on Jun 23, 2010 1:23 AM

Ship-to-party problems?

Hi Friends,
We have a problem in convincing a customer on Ship-to-party feature in Sales order processing.
System allows us to enter a partner as Ship-to-party as long the same is extended to the required sales area and has the right account group.
Now, for a SP, we can enter any SH as long as the partner satisfies the above criterion irrespective of whether it is maintained as a partner in the customer master. Now, this poses a problem.
They did create a standard order and by mistake they have entered a wrong SH parnter( wrong here means an SH which wasn't maintained in the customer master). This is wrong business-wise.
How can we convince them that there is no check to ascertain partner entry (with ref to Customer master)?
Thank you all in advance.
Regards
Ananth

Thanks for your quick reply.
However, by checking "Not modifiable" indicator it makes the partner invalid for changes once we have created a order and go back to it in the change mode(the feild gets greyed out).
But in your 1st reply you had mentioned about"whatever maintained in sold to party customer master, that should flow". Now, how can have a fool-proofing system, wherein it just does what you said.
Request your advice.
Regards
Ananth

AFS ship-to party problem in sale order

Hi!
We use AFS solution.
I use customer "0000087655" as sold-to party in sale order and try to set customer "0001000016" as ship-to party but get message
"Top node 0000087655 for ship-to 0001000016 not maintained or ship-to is not valid
Message no. 8W321"
How to Solve this error?
Thanks and Regards
Sureshkumar

Ensure that the ship to party 0001000016 is created with correct account group. Else change it via XD07.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Issue when creating sales order with Sold-to/Ship-to Party's state

Hi All,
we have issue while creating Sales Order with picking up of State tax
for Ship-to-party & Sold-to-party.
<b>When we create a sales order, for the sold to party 140052732 and
ship to party 140052733 it is picking state tax. Which should not
suppose to pick? Because the partner is marked as tax exemption</b>.
Can any body tell me how can we solve this issue!
Why this is happening!
How to make not to pick tax when it is marked for tax exemtion.
As i am not Functional guy i am not aware what is happening here!
Can anybody solve this issue!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi Deep
What do you mean by "It is picking up state tax"? Does it mean that in the pricing procedure it is picking up a condition type which is meant for state tax?
If so go and check the condition record meant for it. Follow the following steps
1) Go to Sales order
2) Select the line item for which the state tax is being picked.
3) In the condition tab select analysis.
4) In Analysis you shall find the condition type meant for state tax.
5) See which condition record has been found.
6) Go to VK12, enter the state tax condition type and check the condition record for that state tax.
7) If wrong correct it.
8) If anything else come back to the post and inform the details
Thanks
Regards
Sunil

Issue when creating sales order with Sold-to/Ship-to Party's state tax

Hi All,
we have issue while creating Sales Order with picking up of State tax
for Ship-to-party & Sold-to-party.
<b>When we create a sales order, for the sold to party 140052732 and
ship to party 140052733 it is picking state tax. Which should not
suppose to pick? Because the partner is marked as tax exemption</b>.
Can any body tell me how can we solve this issue!
Why this is happening!
How to make not to pick tax when it is marked for tax exemtion.
As i am not Functional guy i am not aware what is happening here!
Can anybody solve this issue!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi Deep
What do you mean by "It is picking up state tax"? Does it mean that in the pricing procedure it is picking up a condition type which is meant for state tax?
If so go and check the condition record meant for it. Follow the following steps
1) Go to Sales order
2) Select the line item for which the state tax is being picked.
3) In the condition tab select analysis.
4) In Analysis you shall find the condition type meant for state tax.
5) See which condition record has been found.
6) Go to VK12, enter the state tax condition type and check the condition record for that state tax.
7) If wrong correct it.
8) If anything else come back to the post and inform the details
Thanks
Regards
Sunil

Purchase Order: Ship to location problem - Please help

Hi All,
I have come across a problem when publishing Purchase orders where the PO header ship to address differs to a seperate PO line ship to address.
I have written the following Choose statement to try and show separate ship to locations for each separate PO line.
<?for-each:G_LINES?>
<?choose:?>
<?when:number(//G_HEADERS/POH_SHIP_TO_LOCATION) = number(//G_SHIPMENTS/PLL_SHIP_TO_LOCATION)?>
<?POL_LINE_NUM?> <?C_ITEM_DESC?> <?LINE_NOTE?>
<?end when?>
<?otherwise:?>
<?POL_LINE_NUM?> <?C_ITEM_DESC?> <?LINE_NOTE?>
SHIP TO: <?ADDRESS_LINE1?>
<?ADDRESS_LINE2?>
<?end otherwise?>
<?end choose?>
<?end for each?>
my logic is that if the header ship to ID is = to the line items ship to ID then just show some basic PO line info.
Otherwise if the numbers differ then show the individual lines info along with the additional Ship to address which is in ADDRESS_LINE1, ADDRESS_LINE2 etc.
And repeat this condition for how ever many PO lines exist for the overall purchase order.
However, when i publish this the "otherwise" condition never gets checked if the first PO line is TRUE and vis versa if the first PO line is false.
So if the first PO line is true then every single PO line will just show the When condition even if the separate PO lines ship to ID differs to the POH_ship to id.
any idea why the otherwise condition wont fall true for the 2nd 3rd or however many PO lines there are if the first PO line is flagged as true?
I hope this makes sense. Many thanks for any help.
Greg

I have a PO that we are using that has basically the same requirements. If the line address is different (any of them) then the header prints a message to "see below" and the address line contains the shipping information.
The way I have done this was to create a variable and compare to see of any of the lines were different when the header was read. Then check the var when the line is processed. The template is quite long as we have many fields that dynamically display/or not so I will post a truncated version below and also please note that on this form we simply gave up using the Oracle's "fantastic" MSWORD plug-in and had to use pure a XML-FO template. However, I think the portions/logic you need should be transferable into MSWORD if you are careful.
If snipit of code is not enough let me know and I can try to paste the entire thing after my marathon meeting today <ugh!>.
--------start code-----------
<xsl:for-each select=".//G_HEADERS">
<xsl:variable name="SAME_SHIP_TO_ADDRESS_USED" select="count(.//PLL_SHIP_ADDRESS_LINE1[. != current()/POH_SHIP_ADDRESS_LINE1]) = 0" />
...(lots of header stuff goes here)
<xsl:for-each select=".//G_SHIPMENTS">
<xsl:if test="$SAME_SHIP_TO_ADDRESS_USED" xdofo:ctx="3">
<fo:block xdofo:xliff-note="if:shipline, eif, if:shipline, ifCountShip>1, PLL_SHIP_ADDRESS_LINE1" padding-bottom="0.0pt" text-align="start" orphans="2" widows="2" padding-top="0.0pt" end-indent="0.0pt" linefeed-treatment="preserve" start-indent="0.0pt" height="0pt">
<fo:inline height="7.0pt" font-family="Arial" white-space-collapse="false" font-size="7.0pt">Address at top of page</fo:inline>
</fo:block>
</xsl:if>
<xsl:if test="not($SAME_SHIP_TO_ADDRESS_USED)" xdofo:ctx="3">
<fo:block padding-bottom="0.0pt" text-align="start" orphans="2" widows="2" padding-top="0.0pt" end-indent="0.0pt" linefeed-treatment="preserve" start-indent="0.0pt" height="0pt">
<fo:inline height="7.0pt" font-family="Arial" white-space-collapse="false" font-size="7.0pt">
<xsl:value-of select="PLL_SHIP_ADDRESS_LINE1" xdofo:field-name="PLL_SHIP_ADDRESS_LINE1"/>
</fo:inline>
</fo:block>
...(lots more address fields here!)
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
------------end code------------
Good luck,
Scott

Function module to find both sold and ship to party

Is there any function module to find both sold-to-party and ship-to-party based on the sales Area.
That is if i give sales org , distribution channel , division as input . I must get Sold-to-party and Ship-to-party as output.
Regards,
S.Velsankar

Hi,
You can find sold to and ship to party customer from KNVP Table as below:-
SELECT      KUNNR
FROM KNVP
INTO w_sold_to_party
WHERE VKORG = YOUR SALES ORG
AND     VTWEG = dist channel
AND    SPART = division
AND    PARVW = 'SP'.                        "Sold to party depneds of how its configured in your system
Check TPAR table for description Sold to part and pass the PARVW value.
Similarly for ship to party
SELECT      KUNNR
FROM KNVP
INTO w_sold_to_party
WHERE VKORG = YOUR SALES ORG
AND     VTWEG = dist channel
AND    SPART = division
AND    PARVW = 'SH'.                        "Sold to party depneds of how its configured in your system
Regards,
Subhashini

OUTPUT WITH THE SOLD TO SHIP TO, AND THE EXPORT PARTNER ADDRESSESS

Hi All,
i have a output problem that in the invoice out put ship to party and the export partners address is getting over laped and the user asks is there any possiblity to have the output superately for the domestic customer and for the export partner. if so how can we configure it and where do we have to do.
can any one please assist me with this.
thanks in advance.

Use a separate output type for domestic and another for export and do the output determination accordingly. You could use the RD00 output type as the std version and assign it to the procedure V10000. maintian the condition records accordingly.
For the export use another procedure V40000. Use another export invoice say FECO or FJIP. This is a US invoice and Japan invoice in the standard.
Change the form to suit your requirement. You may not have to change the print program though to a great extent.
If you have several different types of export invoices then maintain them as condtion records based on country which will then trigger the output type accordingly.
regards
Jude

Shipping Point copy problem from F2 to RK

Hi
While copying from F2 to RK Shipping Point is not copying which is there in F2, again it is re detrmining in RK.
f e.g 1000 plant is having 2 shipping points like 1001 (default) 1002 (manual) 1003(manual) while creating Sales Order system determining 1001 but we given manual shipping point as 1003. after doing up to invoice,
if i create Invoice correction (RK) with ref to above invoice system is showing shipping point as 1001.
but requirement is shipping point should copy as 1003,
how to do thid please guide me any one what changes i have to do in copy controls?
Prasad.

Do you see any shipping point field in billing document F2?
I tried to look but somehow could not locate it.
Try to see this aspect.
In case you locate it please let me know.
Otherwise, I feel system is automatically determining shipping point as per assignment for shipping point determination.

Sold party & ship to party

Dear Experts,
My client has a requirement that they want to show a sales with SP as some doemstic customer but the ship to party will be some foreign customer.Now this ship to party deals with the foreign currency.I know that whatever be the currency of the SH be, it will not have any effect but i wish to knw whether such transaction is possible or not.
R/Sanjeev

Not sure, but I feel you can achieve the requirement for which, you may consider the following:-
a) Have a new order type / billing type and a different document pricing procedure
b) Have a new pricing procedure. Perhaps you can even consider your existing exports pricing procedure if the conditions assigned therein meets the requirement
c) Have the pricing based on Ship To Party in VK11 / PR00
d) Check the document currency while creating sale order and if need, change the document currency to the required
e) How about Payer's currency ??
f) On the CIN part, not sure whether your existing Excise Series Group intended for exports, is enough for this scenario
Please update whatever issues you face or resolved as this will be a new scenario to almost all members.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Shipping point determination problem

Hi Gurus,
I have created a shipping point, assigned an existing plant to it and also created the shipping point determination assignment with fields Shipping condition, loading group and plant. Still the shipping point is not being determined in the sales order.
If I manually enter the shipping point in sales order it gives me an error which reads as 'Ship.condition 11 loading grp 0001 plant IN10 StLoc not defined'
I dont understand what is the setting i am missing for shipping point determination.
Regards,
Sunil

hello, friend.
what interests me is that the message includes the storage location. under more common circumstances, storage location is determined upon delivery processing.
please look into whether:
1. there are enhancements in sales order processing, wherein storage location is determined
2. check the shipping tabs in the sales order if the storage location has been entered (and perhaps the storage location entered is not compatible with the material)
3. i doubt if storage location determination with situation is a factor, since this also takes place at delivery, but it could be worthwhile to check which picking rule is assigned to your delivery type
regards.

Shipping point & STO problem

Dear all,
I have defined shipping point. But when i want to assign same to plant , i am unable to do that due to non- availiaility of my pant in list while i have already defined this plant. What may be the reason?
For STO-MM , i referred to a thread and found that following steps are needed. me21n/vl10b/vl02n/migo. Is this right?
Regards,

Hi Rohit, Seems that some config is missing in the sales area. From my point of view it's not depending on a plant reference. Up to my best knowledge unless the plant is not linked to the sales organization the shipping point will not appear to be selected in the plant configuration. So please check the plant assignment to the sales org. in the enterprise structure. The following steps have to be followed in order to configure stock transport order between two plants.
1. Create a vendor for the Company code of the receiving plant using account group 0007 via T-Code XK01.
2. In the purchasing data view assign the supplying plant and the schema group.
3. Create customer with the sales area of the vendor.
4. The shipping conditions, the delivering plant and the transportation zone determine the route in the STO.
5. In the pricing procedure determination relevant to the STO assign document pricing procedure and customer pricing procedure to get the pricing in the invoice.
6. Maintain condition records for pricing condition.
7. Maintain carrier as a partner in the customer master.
8. In OMGN select the supplying plant and assign the company code and sales area. Similarly select the receiving plant and assign the company code and sales area (The company code to which the plant is assigned to).
9. Assign the delivery type and checking rule to the document type.
10. And finally, assign the purchasing document type to the supplying plant and the receiving plant.
11. Create the STO using T-Code ME 21N and save.
12. Check for release strategy if any and release using T-Code ME 28.
13. Create delivery in background using VL10G.
14. If delivery is created, it is an indication of correct configuration and master data creation.

Sold-to, Ship-to xreference problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for