[SOLVED]Apache File Management Looks

Anyone know of an app that will make the file management in Apache cleaner, or pretty? I bookmarked something a long time ago that had the name "Tiny" in it, but am not at that pc at the moment. I have perused Freshmeat(Quickly, I am at work) and cannot seem to find what I am after.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks!
EDIT: Skinning or Theming WebDAV pages might help too.
:::::Answer was snif php5 script:::::
Last edited by kalaine (2008-03-10 00:36:51)

Maybe this will help....
It is a cutaway of the Mac OS9 Finder. That is the look I am after. The page I was talking about in the above post looked like this, only black folders and gray contrasts.
Thanks!
Last edited by kalaine (2008-01-10 19:07:23)

Similar Messages

  • [SOLVED] A File Manager That Can Group Folders and Files like Fences

    I want to create a custom desktop environment in Arch Linux and I'm looking for a file manager that is similar to Windows Explorer in terms of features and functionality and can group files and folders into fences like Stardock Fences does for the desktop in Windows.
    If such a feature isn't available then I, at least, want to group both files and folders into individual groups based on custom parameters and not just Date or Size.
    Is there any File Manager in Linux that can fulfill my requirements? If not, is there any file manager which can be extended (by scripting or programming) easily to include the features that I'm looking for?
    Last edited by chosentorture (2014-11-27 19:28:40)

    ANOKNUSA wrote:The important thing to keep in mind here is that Windows Explorer is the foundation for the entire Windows interface. If you've ever seen the exploere.exe process die for any reason, you know what I mean. That's the reason it's able to utilize functionality like Fences. In order to get the same kind of functionality in Linux, you'd need a very similar setup. KDE + Konqueror are what come closest from my experience, since the Plasma interface actually has widgets built in that do what you want, but if you use KDE then you use KDE. Full stop. KDE is highly customizable, but only if you use its environment and parts.
    Nah. I don't wanna use KDE. I've heard that it's the most resource hungry DE out there.
    OK, maybe not something like fences in a file manager but I, at least, want to be able to group files AND folders (within a folder or a directory) under a single parameter and that parameter can be custom and not just pre defined like Date and Size.
    Huh. I'm down to Konquerer, like you suggested, and Dolphin. Can I use either as a stand alone file manager in a custom DE in Arch without using KDE?

  • [SOLVED] PCManFM file manager not working for me

    Hi, i'm having some troubles with PCManFM. Every time i want to open the file manager it just doesn't do anything, no errors and no feedback if i run it from a console. If i create a folder on my desktop and double click on it, file manager will pop up and i'm able to use it as it were no problems, but still when i close that window it won't open otherwise than clicking on the folder on the desktop. Any ideas?. It's a clean install, followed the wiki for lxde and i've been using linux for 10 years now, tried to figure it out but i couldn't. It's not my first time with arch but i took a break for the last 6 months, thanks in advance.
    ibfm 0.1.14-2 (lxde)
    pcmanfm 0.9.8-2 (lxde)
    cat /etc/rc.conf | grep DAEMONS
    # DAEMONS
    DAEMONS=(syslog-ng dbus hal !network networkmanager dnsmasqd !netfs crond alsa)
    cat .xinitrc | grep exec
    exec ck-launch-session startlxde
    As i said before, there are no error messages.
    Update:
    I've just found a lead (l think), if i kill pcmanfm process and rerun it the file manager works fine, the way it should, but desktop won't get managed.
    Last edited by oTarUX (2011-01-08 10:00:18)

    Please report or confirm this on the PCManFM bugtracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_i … tid=801864

  • [solved] dolphin file manager losing all custom places entries

    Hi all,
    I am getting phantom problem with dolphin file manager, i added custom place entries there but suddenly they diappear from dolphin.
    There is no any pattern in disappearance. They appear for few days without any problem, even after shutdown/reboot. But suddenly some day they disappear and i have to add them again.
    I want to find cause of this problem then fix it.
    Or at least find config file where dolphin store configuration about custom places that i can backup and restore to get back entries.
    I checked ~/.kde4/share/config/dolphinrc but couldn't find there anything about custom places.
    I am using KDE 4.14.5 and Dolphin 14.11.97
    Last edited by samtech09 (2015-02-16 13:02:09)

    Hi samtech09,
    dolphin stores the configuration of the custom places in ~/.local/share/user-places.xbel.
    The problem you described has already been reported upstream: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343735
    Last edited by mauritiusdadd (2015-02-16 11:30:50)

  • Looking for a file manager with these features:

    Hi everyone,
    I'm looking for a file manager that has the following features (in that order of importance):
      - Designed with keyboard users in mind (but full mouse support also)
      - Easily configurable
      - Supports copying, moving, deleting and the usual operations
      - Good search functionnality
      - Can see a lot of files at once, does not take up too much room on screen
      - Can tie certain file types to applications (ex. open .avi files with video player)
      - Nice to look at
      - [opt.] Can preview pictures (thumbnails or a preview pane)
    Does such a file manager exist? What would you reccomend?
    By the way, my current window manager is pekwm.
    I am new to linux desktops, so this may change.
    Last edited by peets (2007-05-14 23:17:34)

    phrakture wrote:
    slackhack wrote:not trying to be a wiseguy, but the command line actually does everything you require (except mousing, obviously) better than any gui you are likely to find. give it a try, you might be surprised at how often you start using it by default.
    Hah, I was going to say exactly that... "keyboard users in mind? my file manager has some awesome hotkeys - like 'l' then 's' to list files, and 'c' then 'p' to copy, 'm' then 'v' to move, it goes on and on, and it has millions of 'plugins'!"
    Yeah. I fell in love with linux because of the command line. But it's not always the best tool.
    One advantage of graphical file managers is that they offer 'automatic ls': you always see the contents of your directory.
    Also, yesterday I needed to move most files in one directory to another. They had varied names. This would have taken a long time with the command-line: I could have named the files one by one, or moved all of them and then name one by one the files that I want moved back. With a graphical file manager, I can select all files and then 'unselect' the ones I don't want to move with just a few clicks. It's faster and simpler. (Or maybe there's some really fancy CLI tool that I don't know about)
    When choosing a tool for a job, first I look for the most ethical one, then the most practical one. In most cases I would say I prefer the command line, but sometimes a graphical interface is better. Computers are really good at both, so using both methods is the way I go.
    I absolutely love your humour though, slackhack and phrakture. Keep it up!

  • Looking for a file manager with copy queue

    Hey,
    I'm looking for a file manager with a file-copy-queue feature.
    It is useful when browsing mounted samba shares, and you find something you want to copy.
    You'll then start copying the files, and then spot another useful folder. You start copying that as well
    and suddenly you got 5 different file copies processing at the same time, which decreases the copy speed.
    I also miss the feature when transfering files from my external harddrives.
    If there is a lot of FM's with this feature, I prefer one without kde-dependencies, as I am using xfce.

    Ranguvar wrote:If MC really does have that as a feature, it's once again proved itself _the_ graphical (sorta) file manager.
    sorry for misinformed.
    mc has a background job option while copying, it is not exactly a queue like functionality, but simulating to be a queue, and you can stop/resume a background job.

  • (SOLVED) Firefox and Sublime calling Cervisia as file manager

    I'm using KDE 4.13
    Problem In Firefox :
    When a download is completed, it shows up in Downloads window. When I ask "open containing folder", it will display a warning:
    http://up.vbiran.ir/uploads/10587140621 … a-warn.png
    "This is not a CVS folder.
    If you did not intend to use Cervisia, you can switch view modes within Konqueror."
    and then open `Cervisia` :
    http://up.vbiran.ir/uploads/10584140621 … ivitia.png
    Problem in Sublime Text Editor :
    When I running Sublime and then `Pereferences > Browse Packages`
    (Same as Firefox)
    It will display :
    "This is not a CVS folder.
    If you did not intend to use Cervisia, you can switch view modes within Konqueror."
    and then open `Cervisia`.
    Any ideas?
    -- mod edit: read the Forum Etiquette and only post thumbnails http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/For … s_and_Code [jwr] --
    Last edited by kamrava (2014-07-25 07:02:14)

    basica wrote:
    xdg-mime default nautilus.desktop inode/directory
    replace nautilis with whatever the default file manager is for KDE and you should be ok.
    Solved   Tnx
    I'm using `Dolphin` and tried :
    xdg-mime default dolphin.desktop inode/directory
    Worked like a charm.

  • [SOLVED] Permissions [UNSOLVED] & File manager madness...

    Hi guys,
    [Solved bit]
    Been googling in circles and tearing my hair own over this stuff for sufficient time to warrant actually asking for help (a place I rarely end up in due to the wonderful Wiki and Google-foo)
    I'm having some really odd mounting issues with two external drives. Both are formatted ext4, permissions and ownerships are all correct, yet I cannot access the drives as a normal user.
    They mount  fine (I've tried mounting in multiple different ways as my user - from nautilus, dolphin and space filemanagers, and using pmount and udevil from the command line), but I cannot open any folders in any file managers (even ranger), I just get a pop-up saying "you don't have the correct permissions to view the contents of foo" - yet I'm the owner, the group is users and the permissions are 660 (and I can't chmod without sudo even though I'm the owner!).
    Ok, so I just tried 777 and it does work and I have full access. But surely that's not right? I shouldn't need execute permissions to read and write to a drive - by definition! WTF?!
    [Unsolved bit]
    The other bizarre issue surrounding this, is that after I eject a device (either graphically or via sudo umount), and have verified via lsblk that it's no longer mounted) - it remains displayed in all my file managers and errors out when I click on it (duh!).
    What on earth is going on here? I feel like I'm going mad! It's probably something absurdly obvious, but I'm going round in circles here...
    I'd very much appreciate any insight anyone could provide, even if does result in a revealing me to total idiot! (it wouldn't be the first time!)  :-)
    Last edited by knowayhack (2013-02-25 06:52:15)

    Ok, so I'm afraid the file manager thing is still not solved - obviously that was a separate issue...
    Heres the message when I click on the drive that is no longer there:
    Error mounting /dev/sdc1 at /run/media/toby/asus: Command-line `mount -t "ext4" -o "uhelper=udisks2,nodev,nosuid" "/dev/sdc1" "/run/media/toby/asus"' exited with non-zero exit status 32: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc1,
           missing codepage or helper program, or other error
           In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
           dmesg | tail or so
    dmesg tail gives me:
    [16765.967370] cdb[0]=0x28: 28 00 00 00 08 02 00 00 02 00
    [16765.967389] end_request: I/O error, dev sdc, sector 2050
    [16765.967468] EXT4-fs (sdc1): unable to read superblock
    [16879.565843] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdc] Unhandled error code
    [16879.565854] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdc] 
    [16879.565858] Result: hostbyte=0x07 driverbyte=0x00
    [16879.565863] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdc] CDB:
    [16879.565866] cdb[0]=0x28: 28 00 00 00 08 02 00 00 02 00
    [16879.565885] end_request: I/O error, dev sdc, sector 2050
    [16879.565962] EXT4-fs (sdc1): unable to read superblock
    Last edited by knowayhack (2013-02-25 06:24:34)

  • I am looking for a File Manager

    I'm looking for a file manager that will let me see what files I have on my BB itself and on the card.  I would also like to be able to move files from the BB memory to the card in some cases.  Does anyone know if there is such a utility available in the BB world?
    Along with that, I am wondering if I can run applications from the card as well as the BB memory?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Bob

    Hi there!
    Concerning file management, I find that using the USB tether method is the simplest as it lets you treat your Device and Media Card memory as USB drive letters in Windows:
    http://supportforums.blackberry.com/t5/BlackBerry-Desktop-Software/HOWTO-use-your-blackberry-as-a-US...
    There also is a native file manager app:
    Homescreen > Media > BBKey > Explore
    I recall some posts here somewhere about add-ons...you might dig into AppWorld to see if there is anything you might like.
    Concerning your second question about running apps from the Media Card -- no. BB's restrict apps to being installed into the protected and fixed AppMemory location. There are some tricky add-ons that will swap apps in and out of AppMemory when you are not using them, but to run, an app must be installed into AppMemory. There is no option.
    Hope that helps!
    Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
    If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
    Join our BBM Channels
    BSCF General Channel
    PIN: C0001B7B4   Display/Scan Bar Code
    Knowledge Base Updates
    PIN: C0005A9AA   Display/Scan Bar Code

  • [SOLVED] Default Gnome File Manager

    Hello,
    I installed Thunar and it has become the default file manager in Gnome, how can I change this back to Nautalis?
    Thanks.
    Last edited by RAH (2009-02-16 20:10:26)

    I am new to Arch but not quite so new to Gnome. I'm trying to do the same thing as RAH, I think. If I open Nautilus through the Applications menu as File Browser from the System Tools drawer, and then open a folder in Nautilus, the display in Nautilus jumps to the contents of the selected folder, just as it should.
            But if I select a location to open from the Places menu, it opens in Thunar and any subsequent folders opened in Thunar are opened in a new window. I would like to know how to change this behaviour.
            When right clicking a folder and then going to properties, I see no 'open with' tab. There is the 'Open With' option in the context menu, where I see "Open (folder name) and other files of type "folder" with:". After selecting File Browser this does nothing to change how the folders are opened from the Places menu.
            I realize this is a trivial desire but I would appreciate any help I can get on the topic.
    Thanks.
    [EDIT]
    I found what I was looking for in gconf-editor -> apps -> nautilus -> preferences -> always_use_browser  (check mark).
    Stumbled upon this looking for options to remove desktop icons.
    Have a good day. :-)
    (Also what I thought was thunar seems to be a dfferent kind of browsing method in nautilus which is appearantly not "browser". )
    Last edited by hardly (2009-05-07 18:17:48)

  • Nautilus File Manager- does not look inside files (grep)!

    Hi,
    My company is moving me over from Windows XP to a new T420 laptop running Red Hat linux.
    As I do support, I have a long list of  documentation articles in a directory to do my job, and on the Windows side I can just search through the files for phrases or words to bring up information on whatever topic.
    Unfortunately with Nautilus File Manager, the search 'binoculars' on the taskbar only searches through the names of the files, which is kind of useless for what I am needing.
    Obviously Linux can handle grep.   Is there a way you can configure Nautilus to actually look within the files, add an icon, etc?   I don't see anything in personalization or configurable.
    I've looked online for quite some time and am not finding anything, thanks much!

    jeffpass wrote:
    And something called 'searchmonkey' that allegedly works, but I can't find a downloadable link anywhere for Red Hat   finding a GUI based grep for Linux has been much more trouble than I expected.   
    I haven't chased the links all the way to the end, but maybe here?
    http://pkgs.org/download/searchmonkey
    Z.
    The large print: please read the Community Participation Rules before posting. Include as much information as possible: model, machine type, operating system, and a descriptive subject line. Do not include personal information: serial number, telephone number, email address, etc.  The fine print: I do not work for, nor do I speak for Lenovo. Unsolicited private messages will be ignored. ... GeezBlog
    English Community   Deutsche Community   Comunidad en Español   Русскоязычное Сообщество

  • [SOLVED]Iced Tea Fails to Launch Webmin File Manager

    Last night I started receiving an exception error when trying to launch Webmin File Manager from my laptop. I googled combinations of Webmin File Manager and Java and found posts dating back to 2009, 2010 stating webmin didn't work well with Iced Tea but did work with Sun's Java. Fortunately the Arch Java wiki indicated jre existed in the AUR. So a simple,
    sudo pacman -Rs icedtea-web-java7
    followed by,
    sudo packer -S jre
    and Webmin File Manager is accessible again.
    My thanks to AUR maintainer Det.
    Edit: After converting to jre I was able to access webmin filemanager but unable to access webmin ssh2. I reverted back to icedtea and went to the security console. i added https://serverip:10000/ to the exceptions and now both ssh2 and filemenager work.
    Last edited by czubek (2014-07-10 22:01:13)

    Related news: https://www.archlinux.org/news/consolek … by-logind/

  • Failed to execute default file manager (Input /Output Error) [SOLVED]

    I'm having an issue in XFCE where the default Terminal, Browser and File Manager launch correctly - but with this error:
    Failed to execute default [file manager] [terminal emulator] [browser]
    Input /Output Error
    I have the requisite  "Preferred Application" set as Chrome/Thunar/xfce4-terminal.
    If I run
    exo-open --launch FileManager
    From terminal, it says:
    [1]    4281 segmentation fault (core dumped)  exo-open --launch FileManager
    Remember, it launches the app successfully - and the apps themselves launch correctly, it's only exo-open that I have a problem with!  Everything else works great on this system.
    Last edited by yochaigal (2015-04-28 11:10:06)

    demolitions wrote:
    I got the same problem, I observed the problem appearing with those lines in "dmesg", the same library (libpthread-2.21.so) is also present in other software errors (critical and not) since my last update (friday 24th).
    I'll try downgrading glibc, see if that works around the problem.
    [ 587.042204] traps: xfce4-terminal[1022] general protection ip:7f6500100150 sp:7ffe14c978d8 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7f65000ee000+18000]
    [ 592.113288] traps: xfce4-terminal[1026] general protection ip:7fbf1c97a150 sp:7ffe2f916188 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7fbf1c968000+18000]
    [ 620.913826] traps: xfce4-notifyd[494] general protection ip:7fa4859a2150 sp:7fff84dd7708 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7fa485990000+18000]
    [ 974.008983] traps: xfce4-terminal[1384] general protection ip:7f519df84150 sp:7ffe3573e4f8 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7f519df72000+18000]
    [ 974.850083] traps: xfce4-terminal[1387] general protection ip:7f6ed57f8150 sp:7ffec58369c8 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7f6ed57e6000+18000]
    [ 975.521687] traps: xfce4-terminal[1390] general protection ip:7f5e91d00150 sp:7ffd70179d18 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7f5e91cee000+18000]
    [ 979.179030] traps: exo-open[1393] general protection ip:7fbdd2a24150 sp:7ffe9e0c5608 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7fbdd2a12000+18000]
    [ 984.286944] traps: exo-helper-1[1395] general protection ip:7fd5d8473150 sp:7ffd53706a08 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7fd5d8461000+18000]
    [ 1012.318773] traps: xfce4-terminal[1502] general protection ip:7ffb62b1b150 sp:7fffd5c986f8 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7ffb62b09000+18000]
    [ 1101.456187] traps: xfce4-terminal[1521] general protection ip:7f3285cf2150 sp:7fff3c6df158 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7f3285ce0000+18000]
    [ 1102.120447] traps: xfce4-terminal[1525] general protection ip:7fdd50c3a150 sp:7ffe96656ce8 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7fdd50c28000+18000]
    [ 1103.246180] traps: xfce4-terminal[1529] general protection ip:7f93f2b49150 sp:7ffc539d34e8 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7f93f2b37000+18000]
    [ 1103.976302] traps: xfce4-terminal[1532] general protection ip:7f6a55204150 sp:7ffd13eb77f8 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7f6a551f2000+18000]
    [ 1118.718286] traps: xfce4-terminal[1953] general protection ip:7efc94fb9150 sp:7ffd6f5fbed8 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7efc94fa7000+18000]
    [ 1160.851856] traps: xfce4-terminal[1992] general protection ip:7f39aaddb150 sp:7ffdb4478aa8 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7f39aadc9000+18000]
    [ 1165.279367] traps: xfce4-terminal[2004] general protection ip:7f3a50756150 sp:7ffd743c07b8 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7f3a50744000+18000]
    [ 1173.696850] traps: xfce4-terminal[2008] general protection ip:7f0930b98150 sp:7ffc5cd54e78 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7f0930b86000+18000]
    [ 1177.567234] traps: xfce4-terminal[2011] general protection ip:7f5ea2222150 sp:7ffd81d4e898 error:0 in libpthread-2.21.so[7f5ea2210000+18000]
    Tried downgrading glibc from 2.21-3 to 2.21-2 as this is the package which contains libpthread.so, and on my other arch workstations I don't have the issue, but to no avail, same error box pops up when using exo-open, and my IDEs are not starting.
    I'll try comparing installed packages versions on both workstations.

  • [Solved] Auto-open a file manager after mounting with udev rules

    Hellooooo,
    I followed the udev Wiki for auto mounting USBs and it now works great.
    The only problem is: how can I automatically open a file manager of the mounted directory? I tried putting this at the end of the "ACTION=="add"," section in "/etc/udev/rules.d/11-media-by-label-auto-mount.rules" but for some reason nothing happens:
    , RUN+="/usr/bin/dolphin /media/%E{dir_name}"
    Even if I just try to open dolphin with the "ACTION=="add"," section nothing happens either way.
    So what am I doing wrong?
    Last edited by algorythm (2011-05-05 12:35:56)

    In that case, the best choice in my opinion is to use Automounting UDisks Wrappers :
    devmon is a script developed by IgnorantGuru. He left Arch Linux, but the package in AUR is still there and is the last version. For a future new release, it should be available at his blog site. The script is distro independent.
    My udisksvm script, in its default state, doesn't launch a file manager after automounting, but it is not a big thing to let the automounting be done and then manually open a file manager (a new entry in the traydevice right-click menu can also be added for that).
    If you can do without automounting, there is also the bashmount script from jnguyen.
    All these scripts don't require writing any udev rules, they use udisks instead.
    I hope you could find something you like and which will suit your wishes.

  • [SOLVED] small tango icons in file manager

    I've installed the tango icons from AUR. But the problem is the size of the icons is too small in the file manager i used (both thunar and rox) even though i've zoom it. I think the picture below will describe it better:
    [URL=http://img58.imageshack.us/my.php?image=thunaroq4.jpg][/URL]
    I've done a search in this forum. Someone said something about recompiling the tango icons. Done that but the icons are still small. Anybody has any idea?
    Thanks!
    Acidflux

    tango-icon-theme probably should have librsvg as a depend. Please post a bug report.
    tango-icon-theme has libsvg as depend..
    http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?d … s=0&SeB=nd

Maybe you are looking for