[SOLVED] Encryption I/O is very slow on Atom 330

EDIT: Initially titled "Everyday I/O on software RAID1 is very slow"
I recently upgraded my home server from Ubuntu (Hardy, I think) to Arch, coinciding with an disk update (2 * 500GB to 2 * 2TB).
However, I seem to have quite bad performance problems during "standard" usage of the server. Read or write speeds, even on large (2G) files, never exceed 17/18 MB/s (according to 'iostat -m 1').
This causes issues when using the server, for example, watching a video mounted over SSHFS. When the array is written to, it causes the video to pause for a moment, as though all read I/O stops for the ~2 seconds the array is being written to (at the aforementioned 17MB/s). I noticed this initially when I was transferring the files from the old drive and running digest checks (sha1sum) were taking far longer than I expected on my new installation, so I checked iostat which showed me the 17MB/s speed during the sha1sum checks.
This doesn't seem to be an issue with the drives themselves, nor the controllers they are attached to, as when I was creating the array, or if I force a disk to be rebuilt, it read/writes at 80MB/s (per drive and simultaneously), which is what I would expect from these drives (SATA II, 5400RPM).
I currently have it set up as such:
2 partitions per drive, set to raid_autodetect which are md0 and md1 respectively.
md0 is /boot (ext2), md1 is an encrypted volume
Encrypted volume contains an LVM with a 1G swap partition and the rest of the volume is assigned to / (ext3).
Could this setup be the root cause of my issues?
I've never had any performance issues before with encryption (even on my 1.6Ghz tablet which runs at 600Mhz with cpufreq scaling) so it doesn't strike me as it would be an issue for my Dual Core 1.6Ghz/2G RAM server (a Zotac ION-ITX-A for lower power consumption). However, it is possible that a difference in encryption methods may account for it being an issue here as I use the defaults, which may be "paranoid"..
I don't know much about LVM, so I am concerned the mere size of the LVM '/' volume may be the cause of my issue.
I'm happy to provide any extra information or run any tests to help diagnose this issue as it is quite the show-stopper for this server!
Last edited by Xyem (2010-10-20 10:41:09)

Something just occurred to me.. I have just over 90M of free space in /boot which I can play with, so I just ran a quick test (while watching 'iostat')...
sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/boot/test.zero bs=1M count=90
75+0 records in
75+0 records out
78643200 bytes (79 MB) copied, 0.541392 s, 145 MB/s
But 'iostat' didn't show anything. Then it hit me, caching!
sync
/dev/md0 gets written to at 80M/s! So this narrows it down it either being an encryption slowdown or a LVM issue. I can't imagine LVM would slow it down to 17M/s so I am going to format and set this thing up without encryption and see how it goes then
EDIT: I just found this page (http://www.shimari.com/dm-crypt-on-raid … benchmarks) which seems to match the poor performance I am seeing and points the finger squarely at dm-crypt. What is worrying is encryption seems to come with a 75% speed penalty, which is really making me rethink full disk encryption on all my computers (server, desktops, laptops, tablet and carputer)!
EDIT2: Not quite sure on the etiquette in this case, in regards to whether I should edit this post or have made a new one but the cause of this has been identified.
The server has a Atom 330 CPU and after several tests (and confirmed on 2 other machines with the same CPU) it has been discovered that despite being dual core 1.6Ghz cores, the encryption performance on it is absolutely terrible. Changing the cipher to aes-ecb-null results in 28M/s but on a desktop machine (non-Atom), that cipher results in zero performance drop (80M/s raw and encrypted) and the default cipher (aes-cbc-essiv:sha256) only drops to 55M/s. Hope this helps someone else. Off to go and reformat my server and carputer as unencrypted.
Last edited by Xyem (2010-10-17 16:46:32)

Similar Messages

  • Encrypted disk image creation very slow-

    I just got a new MBP with Leopard. I have created a number of encrypted disk images in the past using Tiger and a MBP and have not had any trouble. This weekend I tried a few times to create a 50 gig encrypted disk image (128 AES) on an external drive and after going through the process of setting it up and waiting for it to be created, (and watching the progress bar as it was being created), after about 45 minutes NO progress was showing on the progress bar. I ended up having to cancel the creation a few times because I thought something was going wrong. I’m not sure if there is a problem creating the disk image, or leopard is slow, or what.
    Does anyone know how long, on average, it would take to create an encrypted disk image of this size using leopard? I just want to know if there is a problem doing this on my MBP. Thanks for the help.

    A regular 50 GB disk image takes 50GB of space, no matter if it is full of files or empty.
    A 50 GB sparse disk image only takes up the amount of space equivalent to that of its enclosed files. So if the 50GB sparse image only has 1 GB of files inside, the image won't be much bigger than 1GB.
    A sparse bundle is similar to a sparse image, but instead of a single file it is a folder package with many, many enclosed files called bands. A new file added to the sparse bundle will tend to modify only a few bands. This makes incremental backups of a sparse bundle more efficient because only the changed bands need to be backed up again. Any change to a sparse or regular disk image will mean that the entire image will need to be backed up again.
    If you regularly add/remove files to a disk image, and you intend to back up that disk image with Time Machine, a sparse bundle is definitely the way to go. The other types will fill up your TM volume very quickly.

  • [SOLVED]Gnome "save as" menu very slow

    I am experiencing terrible performance in Gnome while trying to save some file and choosing the directory for the file. It happens in every application (downloading files in Firefox, saving files created in any app etc.). This was the case with every version of Gnome that I used so far, but it's unbearable with 2.24. The CPU load jums to 100% and the process of changing directories is painful.
    Last edited by ux&lx (2009-02-04 09:12:44)

    This is caused by icon themes that use the SVG format. The drawing routine for the icons in that dialogue is dumb and makes drawing various small icons in SVG a pain. So, convert icons to PNG instead (I already told the author of elementary icons to save as PNG for smaller sizes too).

  • *SOLVED* - 2D draw very slow, intel / fglrx Xorg driver

    Hey all,
    My very first support post to the forums
    I have an issue on a few computers whereby the 2D drawing in X is very slow. This happens on my laptop with Intel vga and also on a desktop when using the proprietary fglrx driver. I did not have this problem a few months ago when using stable. At that time, I installed testing and discovered the problem, so I went back to stable. Some time later an update to Xorg came into stable and since then the problem is now in the that tree also.
    I thought it might be the new GEM stuff for the Intel driver, so I installed the 2.6.28 kernel when it was released - it did not solve the problem. Installing an NVIDIA card into the desktop box does solves the problem (can't do that for my laptop!). Because it's happening with the intel and fglrx drivers, but not with NVIDIA, I think it might be a problem with some Xorg component that the NVIDIA driver performs itself? But I've no idea..
    Essentially, I'm using wmii as my desktop, which is a tiled window manager. Creating a new terminal window, switching between them and closing them all is very slow (taking a second or more), when it should be pretty much instantaneous.
    When doing these things, Xorg takes up 90% CPU usage. By comparison, on the same laptop under Debian it only uses 10% CPU (and the problem does not exist).
    I have created two desktop screencasts of what I mean. In the videos I am quickly opening a bunch of xterms and then later holding down 'switch between terminals', then holding down 'close terminal'. I run htop to show the CPU usage.
    Arch, 4.9 MB, OGV - http://christophersmart.com/videos/archlinux-wmii.ogv
    Debian, 5.7 MB, OGV- http://christophersmart.com/videos/debian-wmii.ogv
    Any ideas?
    Thanks a bunch!
    Chris
    Edit: FYI, the desktop has an Intel Core2 CPU with 8GB RAM and 2 x WD Raptor drives in RAID 0. With an ATI card, wmii is unusable.
    Last edited by csmart (2009-01-17 00:19:57)

    Well I first discovered the problem with the 'intel' driver and later when I set up Arch Linux on a desktop I was met with the same issue. I think it might be some part of Xorg that they both share, but it's not just a problem with the catalyst driver.. unfortunately

  • I have an iMac4.1 and my iPhoto is very slow and the thumbnails correspond to the wrong pictures.  How do I fix this? Or is my iMac too old?  Will getting a new iMac solve this problem?.

    I have an iMac4.1 and my iPhoto is very slow and the thumbnails correspond to the wrong pictures.  How do I fix this? Or is my iMac too old?  Will getting a new iMac solve this problem? 
    I realize is only 512MB of memory but I want to make sure that a new iMac will solve this problem.  Can the new iPhoto handle 10GB or more of photos?  Or do I have to go to Picasa anyways in which case I can buy any computer to do that?

    The model of Mac is not partcularly relevant, it's the version of the OS and iPhoto that matter.
    iPhoto - since 2006 - is good for 250,000 images.
    Regards
    TD

  • Yosemite is very slow when i switch on. can someone say why and i can solve the problem??

    yosemite is very slow when i switch on. ten or more seconds. why? how i can solve this problem??
    Thanks riccardo.italy.

    The following items or conditions can slow a Mac. Please see if any of them apply:
    1) Are you running any anti-virus/internet security applications?
    2) Are you running any "cleaning/tune-up/optimizations" applications?
    3) Any peer-to-peer or torrent downloading software?
    4) Any third-party disk backup software that came bundled with an external hard drive?
    5) Any online backup scheme other than iCloud or DropBox (Carbonite; GoogleDrive; MS One Drive)?
    6) Did your financial institution ask you to install Trusteer EndPoint Protection (also known as Trusteer Rapport)?
    If you can answer "yes" to any of those questions, you have some unneeded and performance-robbing software installed.

  • My Macbook Pro purchased Dec 2011 has suddenly become very slow after not using for 2 weeks (close to frozen). What is the problem and how to solve it?

    My Macbook Pro purchased Dec 2011 has suddenly become very slow after not using for 2 weeks (close to frozen). What is the problem and how to solve it?

    Need Help Ye,
    boot your MacBook Pro into Recovery mode by holding down a Command key and the R key as it starts up. Once the Mac OS X Utilities menu appears, select Disk Utility. On the left-hand side of the Disk Utility window, select your internal disk’s boot partition (typically called “Macintosh HD”). On the right-hand side, press the Verify Disk button if it’s not greyed out; if it is greyed out, or if it reports that errors were found, press the Repair Disk button. Once the verification/repair is completed, exit Disk Utility and select Restart from the Apple menu to restart in normal mode. Is it still very slow?

  • 3 year old iMac 24 running OS10.7.4.  After it has been on for a day or so, it stops going to sleep and becomes very slow.  This only happens when Safari is running. Quitting Safari solves the problem.  Has anyone else have the same problem?

    3 year old iMac 24 running OS 10.7.4.  After it has been on for a day or so, it stops going to sleep and becomes very slow.  This only happens when Safari is running. Quitting Safari solves the problem.  Has anyone else have the same problem?  Does not happen on MacBookpro only on iMac.

    Hello Albert, see how many of these you can answer...
    See if the Disk is issuing any S.M.A.R.T errors in Disk Utility...
    http://support.apple.com/kb/PH7029
    Open Activity Monitor in Applications>Utilities, select All Processes & sort on CPU%, any indications there?
    How much RAM & free space do you have also, click on the Memory & Disk Usage Tabs.
    Open Console in Utilities & see if there are any clues or repeating messages when this happens.
    In the Memory tab, are there a lot of Pageouts?

  • How to solve the very slow speed problem for iphoto 8.0.4?

    after i update to 8.0.4, the speed is still very slow which is very annoying, 8.0.2 haven't this problem, i am very regret to update this....
    so anyone know to solve this. the solution is very important for me coz i want to prepare a photo album to my friends for their wedding.
    thanks
    Message was edited by: AntonyMack

    AntonyMack wrote:
    after i update to 8.0.4, the speed is still very slow which is very annoying, 8.0.2 haven't this problem, i am very regret to update this....
    so anyone know to solve this. the solution is very important for me coz i want to prepare a photo album to my friends for their wedding.
    thanks
    Message was edited by: AntonyMack
    It seems that something went very wrong starting with the 8.0.3 update, there are numerous threads about this. Make sure to report this to Apple via http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphoto.html

  • [SOLVED] Arch very slow at boot, high HDD usage

    Hi,
    After an upgrade today (I don't know exactly what packages I upgraded, but it had been around 2 days between when I did it last), my Arch install has been very slow booting up. There is VERY high hard disk usage while booting, and I get the following messages that I never used to get before:
    1 - stalling at running cleanup hook
    2 - A start job is running dev-sda2.device (/home)
    When it has fully booted up into KDM, any keyboard press and the HDD is paging again and things slow to a crawl. I tried logging in, but 10 minutes in and things were still loading.
    I suspect that I might have lost my journal or suffered extreme file system corruption, but I have done nothing of the sort, after the upgrade Arch had a clean shutdown with no out of place messages.
    Right now I'm at school, so I won't be able do more debugging, but once I get home, I'll try and do fsck from the live USB.
    Thanks!
    EDIT: I looked at the systemd wiki, and added noauto,x-systemd.automount to fstab and now instead of saying "A start job is running..." it's now showing: "...recreate volatile files and directories..."; it came and went so fast I didn't have time to read the entire line.
    Last edited by ctown.myth (2013-03-20 00:16:20)

    So, after coming back home, I booted up the live USB and did fsck -fpv on both root and /home. After that I was at a loss so I restarted, and everything seems to be working now.
    I will mark this thread solved, however if someone knew exactly why this happened and what to do in the future to prevent it, it would be eternally helpful!
    Anyways thanks Arch Forums for nothing /s !
    Last edited by ctown.myth (2013-03-20 00:16:05)

  • [SOLVED] Network speed very slow, no apparent reason

    Hello, recently I switched from Windows 7 RC1 to Arch on my home machine (I have used Gentoo, Ubuntu, and Fedora 10 on the same machine in the past), and for some reason network speed is very slow.
    I have Verizon's 20mbit/5mbit package, and I have always gotten that speed.
    Using speedtest.net and 100mb.test from cachefly on multiple computers I have come to the conclusion that it is infact my Arch install that is causing the problem:
    - All other machines on my network are getting 20/5 (both wired and wireless)
    - I ran a speedtest from 2 other machines using the ethernet cable that this PC is on.  Again, full 20/5.
    - scp transfer of 100mb.test from this PC -> other Arch box: ~2.8MB/s.
    - scp transfer of 100mb.test from other Arch box -> this PC: ~2.8MB/s.
    - scp transfer of 100mb.test from this PC -> UK VPS (100mbit line): ~539KB/s
    - scp transfer of 100mb.test from UK VPS -> this PC: ~76KB/s
    - scp transfer of 100mb.test from this PC -> Chicago Server (dual gbit lines): ~563KB/s
    - scp transfer of 100mb.test from Chicago Server -> this PC: ~91KB/s
    speedtest.net result:
    Upload speed seems to be unaffected.
    I have tried disabling TCP window scaling, and appending my hostname to /etc/hosts.
    What is weird though is that the other Arch box has an identical network config,  I don't see any reason why it shouldn't work.
    My NIC is an integrated Realtek something, I can get the exact model if needed.
    Last edited by whipsch (2009-06-05 18:29:21)

    Hi, whipsch
    Can you try ethtool to see if your ethernet card is actually negociating and using a 100Mb full duplex link on your LAN ? If not you can try to force the link parameter with ethtool. Also maybe the driver of your NIc has options related to link negociation.
    Hope this helps,
    JF

  • [SOLVED] Pacman is very slow inside VirtualBox

    Hello everyone, I've used Arch Linux for a while now and I never had any serious issue. I've been testing Arch inside VirtualBox recently and it installs fine and all that but when I try to update the system, updating repos is very slow, once the repos are up-to-date, pacman offers the latest packages to download very fast and waits for me to press 'y'. Once I do press 'y', it downloads the packages very slow.
    I have a 15 Mbps connection (goes up to 30
    Mbps when bandwidth os available).
    I'm using a mirror close to
    My state NY (rit, umoss, vt, or even gatech).
    The /etc/rc.conf and /etc/hosts have the same hostname.
    I've tried to test in VMware server but there was a problem with vmware. Fedora 13 also updates really slow as well. Debian and Ubuntu don't have a problem.
    I have Arch on my flash drive and I booted it up on my machine and pacman works much faster when not inside the VM. The weird thing is that when I was using and older version of VirtualBox, everything was working great, which makes me think that it's a Virtualbox but.. but then why is Debian working fine but Fedora and Arch slow?
    Any suggestions?
    Last edited by Cows (2010-08-26 05:34:49)

    Alright, since no one has posted, I'm going to assume no one knows how to fix this yet.
    I've been messing around for the last couple of days, and I was looking into the network options that VirtualBox has.
    From all the options:
    NAT
    Bridged Networking
    Internal Networking
    Host-Only Networking
    NAT and Bridged Networking seem to make the most sense, but the problem was that NAT requests a new IP from the router and uses it's own driver to do the networking, I saw this as that the VirtualBox NAT driver might be messing up how the traffic flows (including the speed) in Arch Linux and possibly in Linux in general.
    For Bridged Networking, the VM uses the physical adapter of the host, and that shot me right away. I told myself, why use an intermediate driver to communicate with the router if I can use the physical adapter directly and pull information faster. At the point my statement was theoretical, but once I booted up Arch Linux and tried it... the slowness was gone. Pacman now updates repos and downloads packages much faster. Fedora 13 in the VM also works much faster as well, not only for updating repos and downloading packages, but also for web browsing within the VM.
    I think that there might either be a bug or performance issue that's affecting the NAT driver in VirtualBox version 3.2.8 r64453, because you do recall I said that I was using the NAT driver in an older version of VirtualBox and it wasn't slow.
    I hope this can help someone in the future.
    EDIT: Check this page about Networking options in VirtualBox and what they do:
    http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html#network_nat
    - Jon
    Last edited by Cows (2010-08-26 05:42:22)

  • [SOLVED] Web navigation very slow

    I've installed the last version of ArchLinux (archlinux-2009.02-ftp-i686.iso) and the web navigation is very slow. Loading Google's home page in Windows is instantaneous but in Linux it takes about 9 seconds. And the rest of web pages are the same. I've noticed that, when loading a web page, it takes a lot of time in "Looking up www.google.es..." so I guess that it is a networking problem. I've tried several web browser with the same result.
    I've tried several changes which I found in Internet:
    a) According to http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=61408:
      - I included the host name in /etc/hosts
      - I deactivated IPv6  in /etc/modprobe.conf with "alias net-pf-10 off"
    b) According to http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Qui … ux_Install:
    - In /etc/rc.conf, I updated:
          gateway="default gw 192.168.1.1"
          ROUTES=(gateway)
       because my router is in 192.168.1.1 and the page recommended to remove the ! in ROUTES=(!gateway)
    - I added /etc/resolv.conf.head:
          nameserver 192.168.1.1
    These changes improved a bit the performance but I am not satisfied yet. It takes a lot of time to retrieve the 1st page from a server (however, afterwards, the navigation in that server is normal). It looks like there is no cache for DNS names.
    Any hint?
    Thank you in advance
    Last edited by jjjaime (2009-02-23 20:18:22)

    jjjaime wrote:Finally I discovered the reason of the problem. The router offered two DNS servers. However, the 1st one didn't work (even the IP address didn't respond to a ping). This provoked all the delay.
    Glad you found it!  One of the first things I do when setting up a system behind the typical soho router, is to put either the isp's primary and alternate dns addresses into the router itself.  (I actually prefer OpenDNS addresses - scroll to the bottom right of their web page)
    In days of old when soho routers didn't always follow internet rfq's, and seemed to have their internal dns routines tuned for Windows / Mac, doing this helped bypass that nonsense.  Now the *nix boxes had no problems with slow dns lookups, and the windows/mac boxes were just fine as well.  I suppose soho routers are better these days, but I still do this.

  • [SOLVED] pacman very slow

    Hello,
    some days ago I noticed pacman being very slow when synchronizing its database.. I don't remember whether it became slow after upgrading arch, but I thinks so.
    First I thought it was not working at all, because when typing "pacman -Sy", it says ":: Synchronizing package databases..." as usual and nothing happens for like 10 minutes (!) Then I'm getting:
    core is up to date
    And it takes another 5 minutes for:
    extra 621.8K 1014.4K/s 00:00:01 [######################] 100%
    (same for community and multilib).
    As you can see the download goes fast (1 sec) but it takes ages for it to happen. Nevertheless I tried changing my mirror (usually using "Any") but of course it didn't help.
    Hope, someone can help.
    Last edited by Psylver (2011-09-04 01:05:32)

    You most probably have kernel.org mirror activated in your mirrorlist file; changing it to any other location should help.
    Btw: just have seen this thread: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=125802
    Last edited by bohoomil (2011-09-03 14:32:57)

  • My 2012 Macbook pro is running very slow from this week

    Started from the day before yesterday, my Macbook runs very slow. A single click on anything can cause me to wait its finish running. Even when typing
    Here is the result
    EtreCheck version: 2.1 (101)
    Report generated December 4, 2014 at 11:02:03 AM EST
    Hardware Information: ℹ️
      MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2012) (Verified)
      MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro9,2
      1 2.9 GHz Intel Core i7 CPU: 2-core
      8 GB RAM Upgradeable
      BANK 0/DIMM0
      4 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
      BANK 1/DIMM0
      4 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
      Bluetooth: Good - Handoff/Airdrop2 supported
      Wireless:  en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n
    Video Information: ℹ️
      Intel HD Graphics 4000 -
      Color LCD 1280 x 800
    System Software: ℹ️
      OS X 10.10.1 (14B25) - Uptime: 1:16:59
    Disk Information: ℹ️
      TOSHIBA MK7559GSXF disk0 : (750.16 GB)
      S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
      EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
      Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>  [Recovery]: 650 MB
      Macintosh HD (disk1) / : 748.93 GB (377.07 GB free)
      Encrypted AES-XTS Unlocked
      Core Storage: disk0s2 749.30 GB Online
      MATSHITADVD-R   UJ-8A8 
    USB Information: ℹ️
      Apple Inc. BRCM20702 Hub
      Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
      Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
      Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
      Apple Inc. FaceTime HD Camera (Built-in)
    Thunderbolt Information: ℹ️
      Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
    Gatekeeper: ℹ️
      Mac App Store and identified developers
    Launch Agents: ℹ️
      [loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist [Support]
      [loaded] com.oracle.java.Java-Updater.plist [Support]
      [loaded] org.macosforge.xquartz.startx.plist [Support]
    Launch Daemons: ℹ️
      [loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist [Support]
      [loaded] com.google.keystone.daemon.plist [Support]
      [loaded] com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist [Support]
      [loaded] com.oracle.java.Helper-Tool.plist [Support]
      [loaded] com.oracle.java.JavaUpdateHelper.plist [Support]
      [loaded] org.macosforge.xquartz.privileged_startx.plist [Support]
    User Launch Agents: ℹ️
      [loaded] com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist [Support]
      [loaded] com.facebook.videochat.[redacted].plist [Support]
    User Login Items: ℹ️
      iTunesHelper Application (/Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunesHelper.app)
      有道词典  Application (/Applications/有道词典.app)
    Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
      o1dbrowserplugin: Version: 5.38.6.0 - SDK 10.8 [Support]
      Default Browser: Version: 600 - SDK 10.10
      AdobePDFViewerNPAPI: Version: 10.1.12 [Support]
      FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 15.0.0.239 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      Silverlight: Version: 5.1.30514.0 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      Flash Player: Version: 15.0.0.239 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
      googletalkbrowserplugin: Version: 5.38.6.0 - SDK 10.8 [Support]
      SharePointBrowserPlugin: Version: 14.4.6 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      AdobePDFViewer: Version: 10.1.12 [Support]
      Mathematica: Version: 9.0.1.4092152 [Support]
      JavaAppletPlugin: Version: Java 8 Update 25 Check version
    userinternetplugins ℹ️
      RealPlayer Plugin: Version: Unknown [Support]
      aliedit: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      aThunderPlugIn: Version: Unknown
    Safari Extensions: ℹ️
      Extensions: No such file or directory
    3rd Party Preference Panes: ℹ️
      Flash Player  [Support]
      Java  [Support]
    Time Machine: ℹ️
      Time Machine not configured!
    Top Processes by CPU: ℹ️
          5% WindowServer
          2% hidd
          1% M-fM^\M^IM-iM^AM^SM-hM-/M^MM-eM^EM-8
          0% Finder
          0% Dock
    Top Processes by Memory: ℹ️
      172 MB softwareupdated
      112 MB ocspd
      103 MB com.apple.WebKit.WebContent
      86 MB Safari
      86 MB Finder
    Virtual Memory Information: ℹ️
      3.51 GB Free RAM
      3.52 GB Active RAM
      597 MB Inactive RAM
      965 MB Wired RAM
      1.50 GB Page-ins
      0 B Page-outs
    Diagnostics Information: ℹ️
      Dec 4, 2014, 10:21:17 AM QQ_2014-12-04-102117_JIAYIs-MacBook-Pro.hang
      Dec 4, 2014, 09:47:29 AM Self test - passed
      Dec 3, 2014, 11:23:25 AM com.apple.WebKit.WebContent_2014-12-03-112325_JIAYIs-MacBook-Pro.crash

    Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
    ☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
    ☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
    ☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
    The title of the Console window should be All Messages. If it isn't, select
              SYSTEM LOG QUERIES ▹ All Messages
    from the log list on the left. If you don't see that list, select
              View ▹ Show Log List
    from the menu bar at the top of the screen. Click the Clear Display icon in the toolbar. Then take one of the actions that you're having trouble with. Select any messages that appear in the Console window. Copy them to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C. Paste into a reply to this message by pressing command-V.
    The log contains a vast amount of information, almost all of which is irrelevant to solving any particular problem. When posting a log extract, be selective. A few dozen lines are almost always more than enough.
    Please don't indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
    Please don't post screenshots of log messages—post the text.
    Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting.

Maybe you are looking for