[Solved] Higher resolution video windows go out of desktop in Openbox

Hi! My monitor supports resolution upto 1366x768. But as you can see in the screenshot, videos and images that have greater resolution than that go out of the desktop in Openbox. I tried setting scaling mode with xrandr (I tried "Full", "Full aspect", and "Center") but it didn't help. I'm sorry I do not know a technical way to describe it but it looks just as the screenshot.
http://i.imgur.com/FiwDxyW.png
-- mod note: replaced img with url tags. please see forum guidelines on image sizes.  Trilby --
Last edited by celebrimbor (2014-12-03 02:45:43)

Firstly, you shouldn't post full size images. That's against the forum rules and you're likely going to get that pic snipped with a kind note from a moderator if you haven't already by the time I post this.
Secondly, I fixed this issue with vlc by unchecking the box under preferences>interface resize window to video size.

Similar Messages

  • I have Adobe Elements 9 and I used to be able to export HD 1080p videos with no issue. But recently, when I export using H.264 MPEG or MPEG 2, which I normally used, the high resolution videos come out very choppy.  How can i fix this?

    I have Adobe Elements 9 and I used to be able to export HD 1080p videos with no issue. But recently, when I export using H.264 MPEG or MPEG 2, which I normally used, the high resolution videos come out very choppy.  How can i fix this?

    mr
    Are you running the 9.0.1 Update of the program and on what computer operating system is it running?
    Is your video card/graphics card driver up to date according to the manufacturer of the card?
    Is your computer optimized, including maintenance of pile ups of preview files, conformed audio files, and conformed video files?
    Do you have the latest version of QuickTime installed on your computer with Premiere Elements 9.0/9.0.1?
    What are your project settings and what are the properties of your source media? When you say that "used to be able to export...." is that on the same computer, same brand/model/settings for the camera recording the video now in use, same Premiere Elements 9.0/9.0.1?
    Where player are you using for the playback of these exports?
    Please give us more details on the size of the projects (then and now) as well as details of the customized export settings in your Share/Computer/ route. Premiere Elements 9.0/9.0.1 is only a 32 bit application running in 32 bit or 64 bit system. Not sure if computer resources might be taxed more so now than before.
    More later.
    ATR

  • In iMovie, why do I get the msg "high resolution video thumbnails and then it immediately starts with "now" and it's hung up for a long time

    In iMovie, why do I get the msg "high resolution video thumbnails" and it automatically goes to Now and the laptop is hung up for a very long time and I have to shut down to get out of it?

    Hi,
    Welcome to the    Discussions
    So we have DSL Modem <-> Base Station <-> Computer connected by Ethernet.
    Is the Modem Routing ?
    Is the Base Station set to "Share An IP" ?
    (i.e are there two DHCP servers on your LAN ?)
    Is Internet Sharing On in th G5s System Preferences > Sharing pane ?
    In the Base Station is Port Mapping Protocol Enabled if it is doing routing ?
    It is in the NAT tab of the Internet Pane.
    Is the G5 also doing WiFi to the Base Station ?
    Also check the Modem is not Blocking PINGS as this log shows no PING (But I am not sure it even got that far)
    7:45 PM Thursday; February 18, 2010
    Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"

  • Do I lose High resolution video signal when I capture through FireWire?

    I have being reading that capturing through Aja Kona video card is an uncompressed video capture. does it mean, I lose some part of my HD resolution video signal when I capture it through fire wire? Could somebody explain me? Thanks.

    No, capturing DV or HDV via firewire is a bit for bit transfer of the original recording ... zero loss.

  • CS6 on High Resolution Screen Windows 8.1

    Hallo,
    I am using CS6 on a laptop with a 3200x1800 Screen. 
    Wonderfull for pictures  -  But, while Win8.1 enlarges the icons and menus in standard appclications all the icons in the CS UserInterface are so tiny it is hard to find them.
    Is there a possibilty to enlarge them?
    greetings 

    Same problem here. I just got a beautiful Yoga laptop. It's quick and has a beautiful screen. I have both Adobe CC and CS6. I really prefer Dreamweaver CS6 over Dreamweaver CC for a number of reasons. Some of them are things that Adobe decided to take away from CC. I've been experimenting with different settings of screen resolutions and text sizes. In CS6, the menus are too tiny to read. However the text on the Web pages I'm working on is huge in Design view - and the layouts fall apart. I haven't found a resolution and text size combo that works.
    CC is just a bit better. However, the on the menus looks like it's bold that's a bit out of focus.
    Now, really, Adobe. Doesn't it stand to reason that designers would have high res screens. What are you thinking? We need some support here - for CS6 and CC both. If the other software can manage - why can't you?

  • [SOLVED]Cant get video drivers sorted out on openbox install

    I'm using the xf86-video-ati driver with a ATI radeon 7850 and would like to avoid using the catalyst driver unless it's my last resort. I'm doing an install with lightdm and openbox. I followed that wiki which basically says to install the driver and it should autodetect my resolution with no problems. Well I've been stuck at 1024x768 for a day now.
    I went through the xorg log file and was unable to figure out what exactly is wrong myself, but here it is: http://pastebin.com/E46sv47N
    As far as I can tell the correct drivers loaded but the resolution was set wrong. although if I plug in an hdmi cable in place of the DVI nothing happens and I get a black screen.
    I'm trying to get a 1920x1080 resolution but the closest I've gotten is what looks like 1920x1080 squished over to the right side of the screen with a large black bar to the left side. I "accomplished" that by executing the following:
    [archer@arch ~]$ cvt 1920 1080
    # 1920x1080 59.96 Hz (CVT 2.07M9) hsync: 67.16 kHz; pclk: 173.00 MHz
    Modeline "1920x1080_60.00" 173.00 1920 2048 2248 2576 1080 1083 1088 1120 -hsync +vsync
    [archer@arch ~]$ xrandr --newmode "1920x1080_60.00" 173.00 1920 2048 2248 2576 1080 1083 1088 1120 -hsync +vsync
    [archer@arch ~]$ xrandr --addmode DVI-1 1920x1080_60.00
    [archer@arch ~]$ xrandr --output DVI-1 --mode 1920x1080_60.00
    Anyone have an Idea what I'm doing wrong here?
    Last edited by roottoor (2014-07-20 02:15:58)

    emeres wrote:
    Use
    xrandr --props
    to get EDID data and the decode it using edid-decode. Did you try using DVI-0 instead of DVI-1?
    It gave me
    xrandr --props
    Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1024 x 768, maximum 16384 x 16384
    DisplayPort-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
    dither: off
    supported: off, on
    audio: auto
    supported: off, on, auto
    underscan vborder: 0
    range: (0, 128)
    underscan hborder: 0
    range: (0, 128)
    underscan: off
    supported: off, on, auto
    coherent: 1
    range: (0, 1)
    HDMI-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
    dither: off
    supported: off, on
    audio: auto
    supported: off, on, auto
    underscan vborder: 0
    range: (0, 128)
    underscan hborder: 0
    range: (0, 128)
    underscan: off
    supported: off, on, auto
    coherent: 1
    range: (0, 1)
    DVI-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
    dither: off
    supported: off, on
    audio: auto
    supported: off, on, auto
    underscan vborder: 0
    range: (0, 128)
    underscan hborder: 0
    range: (0, 128)
    underscan: off
    supported: off, on, auto
    coherent: 1
    range: (0, 1)
    DVI-1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 0mm x 0mm
    load detection: 1
    range: (0, 1)
    dither: off
    supported: off, on
    audio: auto
    supported: off, on, auto
    underscan vborder: 0
    range: (0, 128)
    underscan hborder: 0
    range: (0, 128)
    underscan: off
    supported: off, on, auto
    coherent: 1
    range: (0, 1)
    1024x768 60.00*
    800x600 60.32 56.25
    848x480 60.00
    640x480 59.94
    also here's this
    xrandr --props | edid-decode
    Extracted contents:
    header: 53 63 72 65 65 6e 20 30
    serial number: 3a 20 6d 69 6e 69 6d 75 6d 20
    version: 33 32
    basic params: 30 20 78 20 32
    chroma info: 30 30 2c 20 63 75 72 72 65 6e
    established: 74 20 31
    standard: 39 32 30 20 78 20 31 30 38 30 2c 20 6d 61 78 69
    descriptor 1: 6d 75 6d 20 31 36 33 38 34 20 78 20 31 36 33 38 34 0a
    descriptor 2: 44 69 73 70 6c 61 79 50 6f 72 74 2d 30 20 64 69 73 63
    descriptor 3: 6f 6e 6e 65 63 74 65 64 20 28 6e 6f 72 6d 61 6c 20 6c
    descriptor 4: 65 66 74 20 69 6e 76 65 72 74 65 64 20 72 69 67 68 74
    extensions: 20
    checksum: 78
    No header found
    Manufacturer: NQ@ Model 696d Serial Number 1970104686
    EDID version: 51.50
    Analog display, Input voltage level: 0.714/0.286 V
    Configurable signal levels
    Sync:
    Maximum image size: 32 cm x 120 cm
    Gamma: 1.32
    DPMS levels: Off
    Non-RGB color display
    First detailed timing is preferred timing
    Established timings supported:
    720x400@88Hz
    640x480@60Hz
    640x480@67Hz
    640x480@75Hz
    832x624@75Hz
    Standard timings supported:
    704x704@110Hz
    632x632@92Hz
    1208x1208@92Hz
    640x640@108Hz
    696x696@108Hz
    600x600@92Hz
    1120x840@93Hz
    1208x906@101Hz
    Detailed mode: Clock 300.610 MHz, 817 mm x 822 mm
    877 929 1473 1165 hborder 56
    822 829 837 2921 vborder 52
    +hsync -vsync bipolar analog composite
    Detailed mode: Clock 269.480 MHz, 1584 mm x 1056 mm
    1651 1762 2388 4835 hborder 105
    1377 1432 1452 1498 vborder 115
    +hsync -vsync analog composite side by side interleaved
    Detailed mode: Clock 282.710 MHz, 1650 mm x 365 mm
    1646 1934 2486 2515 hborder 108
    1652 1706 1768 2777 vborder 32
    -hsync +vsync bipolar analog composite four way interleaved
    Detailed mode: Clock 262.130 MHz, 1568 mm x 2418 mm
    1652 2022 2650 3988 hborder 103
    1646 1668 1673 3044 vborder 104
    -hsync +vsync digital composite four way interleaved
    Has 32 extension blocks
    Checksum: 0x78 (should be 0xa1)
    EDID block does not conform at all!
    Block has broken checksum
    Bad year of manufacture
    Bad week of manufacture
    Manufacturer name field contains garbage
    Also I have not tried dvi-0, that should be my other DVI-D port and I need the DVI-I.
    Last edited by roottoor (2014-06-21 00:57:33)

  • High resolution video compression.

    I'm trying to compress a music video I shot through quicktime, and am not sure if I'm using the correct codec, (apple pro-res 422, 1280x720) When I do export the film, the quality is spectacular, but it won't export the entire video, just 3 of 6 minutes. Also, there are glitches in the footage.
    It will be going on the internet, but I was also planning on showing on a larger tv screen. What am I doing wrong?

    alexhmcl wrote:
    Raw footage:
    shot in avchd. Dim: 1920 x 1080 codec: apple intermediate codec .mov files
    Sequence format:
    frame size: 720 x 480 aspect ratio ntsc dv (3:2)
    pixel aspect ratio: ntsc - ccir 601 / dv (720 x 480)
    field dominance: lower (even)
    compressor: dv/dvcpro - ntsc
    You might as well take a chain saw to your lens before you shoot next time. Putting any sort of video into a DV sequence to edit takes a big crap on any expected quality. Always use a sequence setting that exactly matches your source footage.
    And in the future, use ProRes instead of AIC, to shorten your render times and allow more RT.
    - Although I've tried changing my sequence setting numerous times, I get the same results with the final product. So I returned to my default settings.
    Getting the footage to compressor, I've tried exporting it through compressor right from fcp, that's when I see the horizontal lines
    I've tried exporting through quicktime, and that's just poor quality, low resolution.
    I've also tried to export the file via quicktime, then bring it back into compressor, quality is better but the horizontal lines appear again,
    You're getting interlace problems. Read up on upper field vs. lower field and interlace vs. progressive.

  • High resolution output for Windows Media Player?

    Im trying to play a high resolution video (1280x720), that was edited on Premiere Pro, through my media player and/or the Power DVD (on both a xp and a vista computer). I made a multiplexed MP2 (blue ray) file, but it would not play in either program. The extension (.m2t) is not recognized.
    Any suggestions of getting this to play (with the best quality)? Is there another mp2 file I can create for this purpose? Do I need to render as a movie file (and get Quicktime pro) or as a high quality avi (...using which codex)?

    Ok, I have e new problem Blue Ray multiplexed will only work with Dolby Digital, and apparently Dolby Digital is a trail copy with Premiere cs3, and I used all trial copies. The cost is prohibitive to get Dolby, so Im back at square 1.
    I am now rendering using MPEG 2 setting at a high resolution (though not blue ray). It plays fine with all media players. The question now is progressive or interlaced for HD TV monitors?

  • M400 Screen Resolution for Windows 7

    Hi all,
    I have an m400 tablet that I just got off lease and fixed up.  It is great running Windows 7 except that I think that I am supposed to be able to set the screen resolution to something higher than 1024 x 768.  Right now, that is the highest setting.  The only other choice is 800 x 600.  I have installed the latest graphics drivers for windows 7 from the toshiba support website.  
    Is this the limit for this machine?  It seems like it should go higher considering the M200 machine goes to the higher resolution with windows 7.
    I am running Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit.  
    Thanks!
    Red
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Thanks for the reply Jerry!
    It is an S5032.  
    I looked it up and you are right about the screen resolution.  It makes me feel better to know it is correct.  I had been reading about the higher resolution and I didn't realize there were diffferent specs for different versions of the notebook. 
    The m200s that I bought both allow for the higher resolution (by default on XP and with a hacked driver in windows 7).  It is understandable as to why they changed to the lower native resolution though.  The higher resolution makes reading text difficult on a 12.1 inch screen.
    It is hard to belive that this notebook retailed for $1700 in 2007 and I bought this one for $50 on ebay + $25 for a battery and power cord.  I already had a hard drive and copy of windows for it (Windows 8 Consumer Preview also worked very well but I removed it because I thought the graphics driver was not working haha).  
    Thanks again.

  • ?: Will a high resolution display work in PSCC (Windows)

    Hello everyone,
    I am going to be purchasing a windows laptop 15" that has 2 screen resolution choices. I can choose a 1920x1080 or a 2880x1080. I would rather purchase the 2880x1620 display but i am confused as to whether or not it will work properly with Photoshop CC in a Windows environment.
    Here are my 3 questions for you:
    1. Will a 2880x1620 display be workable with PSCC or should i opt for the 1920x1080 option?
    2. If there is no solution currently for the higher resolution option do you think there may be one soon?
    3. If i purchase the 2880x1620 display can i run it at a lower resolution until the problem is fixed or will not running it at the native resolution create other problems?
    Thank you so much for helping me with this. I need to order the laptop soon and im at a loss as to which display to select.
    Best to you and thanks again,
    rick

    Yes Trevor thats me! I thought that was you! How are you doing?? Great to hear from you :-)
    A couple of things as i stayed up late last night looking around.....
    I have looked at the Dell Precision M4700 and because its got the older processors & its not as expensive as the M4800 but would seem to work well for me. Im looking for something that is not too high a resolution like 1920x1080 (and even that is pushing it on a 15.6" screen im sure), good viewing angles, lots of RAM, decent NITS, decent sRGB coverage and that wont break the bank. Easy chore huh?
    I think with this purchase im going to have to make some compromises and by getting this machine i think i will be ok. Im sure they will probably come out with a high resolution fix the day i get my lower resolution display but hey, thats the way it goes huh?
    Im using a very old MacBook Pro right now that is 1200x800 and it is excellent so im sure i'll be fine with a 1920x1080 display.
    One thing that has me confused is when i look at Dell's website it states that all of their machines are approved for Photoshop CS6. Kind of funny they would say that if that includes the high rez version no?
    Also, they have something called an "optimizer" which i beleive is software that works with your computer to optimize it for certain applications on the fly. It lists it as working well with Photoshop. That would in no way be a solution to the high rez display issues would it?
    I even saw a video that had the highest resolution display with Photoshop on it and it looked fine! Did they Photoshop that??
    Any insight you can give me before i pull the trigger would be most appreciated. I am getting a Windows machine because i have to run QuickBooks for Windows on it and i dont want to use Parallels or Boot Camp. Just me but i dont like the idea of doing that (i know im wierd!)
    Hope to hear from you all soon!
    Thank you so much for the great help!
    best to you,
    rick

  • Will we ever see full-resolution video out on 5G ipods?

    hi!
    i'm an independent filmmaker. it would be very very useful for me if i could store all of my movies on my video ipod at full resolution (720x480) so I could basically carry a backup of all of my work with me at all times. it'd be especially useful for pitch meetings & stuff.
    does anybody know if apple plans to support full tv resolution at any point in the future? that would really make the video ipod an unbeatably awesome device!

    I think the real question here is if Apple will make it so that, with an iPod and AV cable, you can watch a movie on a easonable sized TV without the currently obvious lack of resolution.
    I would assume that in the future, the iPod will be able to, because if not, there was really no reason to make the AV output in the first place. I'm sure no one is really using it now, since the quality looks so bad; If you're trying to watch LOST or Desperate Housewives you may as well power up the VCR.
    As for right now, I've heard of some people using Videora with certain settings and getting higher resolutions to work on the iPod. I haven't been able (as of yet) to figure out how to do it, but there's got to be a way.
    Sorry I couldn't be of more help.

  • Internet Security UI scaling on Windows 8.1 and high resolution displays

    Please make the Internet Security UI scale properly on Windows 8 and high resolution screens. I have a 13" laptop with 3200x1800px screen resolution and Internet Security UI is pretty much unusable without a magnifying glass. Here's a screenshot (scaled down to 1920p). The text is physically about 1.7mm high... 

    Good idea

  • If I put a low resolution video on the new ipad, is it display in a small window or in full screen?

    If I put a low resolution video on the new ipad, is it display in a small window or in full screen?

    How about 240P ?
    Type in Very Angry Cat......................looks like crap on my iPad3.................but most 640 and up look OK

  • Can I expect a video to be in high resolution in an interactive PDF?

    Can I expect a video to be in high resolution in an interactive PDF?
    I’m doing a project in which I want to burn a music video and a image portfolio. The images look very good when exported but the video stutters and is pixelated. Can I expect the video to look as good as if I would burn it in Encore for example?

    Thanks for your quick reply. Sorry, should have said that. I'm using CS5.5
    Thing is, this is going to be a promotion DVD with the video and some pictures. I heard about the interactive PDF and liked the way I could build it like a portfolio, the way you can click through the images
    and click to see the video.Everything looks good except the video.
    I tried to do this in Encore but there I got bad image quality and good video quality. In InDesign I get bad video quality and good image quality.
    My video is made in Premiere pro so maybe I should check the media encoder.
    But, with the project I want to do, what program would you suggest?

  • ITunes for Windows: HiDPI (high resolution) support?

    When will iTunes support high resolution display panels in Windows? It is blurry at 3200x1800 on my laptop.

    Is there a process to update my iTunes. I've used this gear driver and it's worked GREAT for a long time, but when and if I ever update my iTunes it breaks this and I've tried uninstalling/reinstalling gear, reverting back to the same version of iTunes and completely reinstalling both but nothing seems to work. Is there a good process to revert back and reinstall iTunes and the gear driver?

Maybe you are looking for