[SOLVED] KDevelop 4 and locked session

Has anyone an idea how to unlock a session? I always get an error while launching KDevelop 4 and the IDE doesn't start.
package update solved my problem
Last edited by der.ralle (2012-02-26 16:27:15)

arch0r wrote:make sure that you start with a new session in kde. i think the problem is, that it restores the last session, where firefox was opened :>
system settings > session sth.
This it was the problem. I am new in KDE, so still not to manage it very well. Thank you very much for his help

Similar Messages

RFBIBL00 and locked session

Hi all,
Why when I launch RFBIBL00 this program create a locked BI session?
thank you.

Hi Fabrizio,
I'm not sure because I haven't a system here, anyway
i beleve that you have the lock because in the BGR00 record there is a date field. If it is not initial the session is locked, else no.
I don't remember if there is any check starting RFBIBL00.
I hope it help you.
bye enzo

My MacBook Pro has been wiped and locked, who can I contact to help me solve this problem?

HI there,,,
My MacBook Pro has been wiped and locked. It is requesting a PIN consisted of four numbers only.
Who do I contact to help me solve this problem?

I do not know what really happend. however, my Mac is requesting a four digit PIN to open and I really have now idea what those numbers might be. when I contacted my son, he sugested that it is locked or wiped. I have all the official and required papers to claim that I am the rightful owner of the product.
who do I contact or what should I do to solve this problem?
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Sarah Zabrmawi

RDP disconnect and NOT lock session?

How can I disconnect and RDP session and NOT lock the console. This is a dedicated HTPC. I want to avoid using VNC if I can but I cannot find a way using MTSC or TSCON to do this.
thanks

To: Prabhat Kumar
Thanks, but I would like to know can we force put this action (tscon...) when disconnect the RDP. I have a computer which can do that, but I don't know how to make it. Any idea for this?
Thank you.
Old thread, I know. But I had forgotten tscon and needed it for a (laughably) some digital signage... If it's me, I'd just create a batch file on the machine you're RDP-ing to using
Livin's solution. This way, your command line session exits after execution and it's only a double-click away. Now, since it's an HTPC you're using that (I'm presuming) is single-headed (one monitor), you'll probably want to throw your media interface back
up when you're done doing whatever.
Unfortunately, I haven't found a solution for a program that's already running, but this will open an executable and maximize it:
START /MAX [path to executeable]
So, your final "code" for your batch file, if you're using Windows Media Center, would read something like this:
START /MAX %windir%\ehome\ehshell.exe
tscon 1 /dest:console
exit
The 'exit' is not necessary in my experience, but I usually add it anyway.

Parallel (same) background jobs: Memory and locking issues

<b>Scenerio:</b> Multiple concurrent inbound asynchronous XI messages need to be processed in SAP. We have the XI proxy initiating an RFC. This RFC exports internal tables (essentially the XI payload) to a unique shared memory ID (for each XI message). RFC then submits an abap (submit..and return) in a background job. This abap reads (via IMPORT) the shared memory ID to get the data then process it.
<b>Problem:</b> : When multiple concurrent jobs/abap are running, often, but not always, one of the submitted abaps either gets a non-zero return code from the IMPORT, or the IMPORT from shared memory seems to work fine, but the table contents contains data from the other (parallel) run, even though the memory ID used is correct and unique.
I have attempted to resolve this by using various methods (memory IDs, SPA/GPA parameter, ENQUEUE) of locking in the RFC (unlocking at end of abap), so that only one background job is executed at a time. However, the best I can do is having two or three running in parallel.
So I'm wondering how to solve this memory issue and/or how to make the abap processing synchronous? Any help appreciated. Thanks.

There is a limitation on Amt of data you can store in ABAP Memory and SAP Memory .. check those limitation ..per user ..
also check for Number of external session granted by urr basis ppl...
it may be possible that only 3-4 session are allowed coz each background process create and external session ..

Please help! Major problems (performance and lock-ups) with brand new W520 with Intel 520 SSD

My company primarily uses HP machines but I've been a long time IBM (now Lenovo) fan so I recently had IT purchase me a new Lenovo W520 (product ID 42763LU).
Once the machine arrived I had them do the following:
Remove the 500GB HDD and replace it with an Intel 520 series 240GB SSD
Remove the optical drive and install the 500GB hard drive that came with the machine in the optical bay (with the bay adapter of course)
Format both drives and put a preconfigured windows 7 64-bit image on the SSD
A general summary of the system is the following:
Intel i7-2860QM CPU
8GB RAM
NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Intel 520 240GB SSD (primary HDD) [SSDSC2CW240A3]
Hitachi 500GB HDD (optical bay) [HTS727550A9E365]
Intel Advanced-N 6205 network adapter
TouchChip Fingerprint Scanner
The machine was a few days delayed getting to me due to "hard drive driver issues" (that's what I was told). When I received the machine I immediately noticed that it was much slower than I expected (I have a custom built i5 HTPC at home running windows 7 on a Crucial SATA III SSD that I was comparing it to) and I was experiencing frequent hangs (ranging from 30 seconds to multiple minutes), super long boot times, general “slowness” at times, and occasional lock-ups. Since our "baseline" laptop here at work is the "equivalent" HP workstation my IT guys have been less than helpful in helping me to solve this issue. Being reasonably computer savvy I decided to try to try to fix the issue myself. I performed the following “troubleshooting” steps:
1. One of the first issues (errors) I noticed in the event viewer was errors related to the optical drive. Clearly the image they installed on the machine was not from a machine with the same hardware configuration. So, I decided to just wipe the machine and perform a fresh install of windows 7 from the disks (well, USB). After spending multiple days installing windows, performing updates, making sure all the drivers were current, and installing only the critical software I need, I was disappointed to realize that although I fixed the optical drive errors the machine was still slow, was hanging, and locking up regularly.
2. Removed the cover on the machine and removed/reinstalled the drive to verify it was secure.Everything looked good.
3. Verified the latest firmware is installed on all my Intel hardware. Everything seemed up to date.
4. I performed a number of troubleshooting steps like booting the machine with/without the battery, with/without the HDD in the optical bay, installed/removed from the docking station, etc. and none of these things helped (also a note – occasionally when running on the battery I was hearing a strange “buzz” or “static” sound coming from the area around the SSD).
5. Next I did some internet research and learned quite a few things. First, it sounds like others have had similar problems with this machine and/or SSD combo and there were quite a few options suggested to “fix” these issues. The general consensus for troubleshooting steps were:
5.1. Download and install the latest Intel chipset drivers and AHCI controller drivers (overwriting whatever windows installs during updates).This didn’t fix anything.
5.2. Turn off PCI express link state power management in the power manager. This didn’t fix anything.
5.3. Disable superfetch, prefetch, indexing, defragmentation, page file, system restore, and hibernate. A few of these were already disabled by windows so in those cases I just verified they were disabled in the services and application editor. These things may have slightly increased performance but did not fix the major hang/lockup issues I was having.
5.4. I followed online steps to edit the registry to disable the PCI link power management by adding ports, adding the required variables, and setting them all to 0. This did seem to have fixed the hangs and/or lock-ups but the machine is still much slower than I would expect (boot times are still pretty slow and it does “stutter” when I’m doing more than one thing at a time. Also a note here – I have the Intel SSD toolbox installed and I noticed that it was giving me a warning for DIPM not being optimized. I made the mistake of clicking “Tune!” and then started having the hang/lock-up issues again. I went back into the registry and sure enough the PCI link power management variables for ports 0 and 1 were set back to 1. I set them back to 0 and the hangs have gone away. I will not be “tuning” the DIPM through the Intel SSD toolbox again…
6. I also fixed a couple of other minor errors I was seeing in the event viewer by disabling benign services and/or making slight timeout modifications (I researched each issue on the internet to verify they were benign before I implemented any changes). These fixes didn't seem to do anything other than make some of the errors/warnings go away. So, the list of errors/warnings has become much smaller but I’m still getting the following (maybe an issue, maybe not?):
Event ID 37 for every processor saying that they are in a reduced performance state for xx seconds since the last report
Event ID 10002 - WLAN Extensibility Module has stopped
Event ID 4001 - WLAN AutoConfig service has successfully stopped
Event ID 27 – Intel® 82579LM Gigabit Network Connection link is disconnected
I suspect the WLAN errors have something to do with windows fighting with the Lenovo access connection tools?
7. Since the machine still seemed slow I downloaded the program AS SSD and checked the performance of the SSD. When I compared my performance numbers to the benchmark numbers I found onlineI was very surprised to discover that I’m getting about 50% of the performance that I should (values below are read/write).
Seq: 262.11 / 188.32 (s/b 504.58 / 298.28) [MB/s]
4K: 15.83 / 44.92 (s/b 21.70 / 62.60) [MB/s]
4K-64Thrd: 165.23 / 154.46 (s/b 241.38 / 234.08) [MB/s]
Acc.time: 0.218 / 0.294 (s/b .0186 / 0.208) [ms]
Score: 207 / 208 (s/b 314 / 327)
Overall Score: 533 (s/b 797)
One more note - it seems like my cooling fan is running at a high speed almost all of the time. This is probably one of my power settings (I think I have it set for max performance) but it's even doing this when there is no load (i.e. I'm using IE and just vieweing webpages - like right now).
So, I apologize for such a long post but I’ve spent countless hours researching and troubleshooting this problem and haven’t been able to figure out what the heck is wrong here. Am I missing something simple or do you guys think I have a SSD and/or problem with the machine itself? To say that any and all help would be greatly appreciated would be a massive understatement – I’m on the verge of pulling my hair out and I really need this machine working as quickly as possible!
Please let me know if you have any suggestions and/or need additional information. Thanks in advance for your help!
-Erik

Lol gotcha about the drive as an option. I didn't go SSD with mine. Do you have the latest firmware on your drive? It is supposed to be v1.97. Just checking (ah and I see item 3 so guess so). Do you have the SSD drive toolbox software installed?
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/SearchResult.aspx?lang=eng&ProductFamily=Solid+State+Drives+and+Cach...)
Seems some useful tools are in there. I can't say much beyond that with the drive. Oh. Why does your fan always run at high speed? Can you describe that? I mean, are we troubleshooting the right kind of issue? Is there anything else going on with your system? I saw about the reduced core speeds message. what are your system loads like? Anything causing high cpu utilization? Could be something other than the drive causing your low numbers and lockups.

What is the difference between Session timeout and Short Session timeout Under Excel Service Application -- session management?

Under Excel Service Application --> session management; what is the difference between Session timeout and Short Session timeout?

Any call made from the API will automatically be set to the “Session Timeout” period, no matter
what. Calls made from EWA (Excel Web Access) will get the “Short Session Timeout” period assigned to it initially.
Short Session Timeout and Session Timeout in Excel Services
Short Session Timeout and Session Timeout in Excel Services - Part 2
Sessions and session time-outs in Excel Services
above links are from old version but still applies to all.
Please remember to mark your question as answered &Vote helpful,if this solves/helps your problem. ****************************************************************************************** Thanks -WS MCITP(SharePoint 2010, 2013) Blog: http://wscheema.com/blog

Re: Transactions and Locking Rows for Update

Dale,
Sounds like you either need an "optimistic locking" scheme, usually
implemented with timestamps at the database level, or a concurrency manager.
A concurrency manager registers objects that may be of interest to multiple
users in a central location. It takes care of notifying interested parties
(i.e., clients,) of changes made to those objects, using a "notifier" pattern.
The optimistic locking scheme is relatively easy to implement at the
database level, but introduces several problems. One problem is that the
first person to save their changes "wins" - every one else has to discard
their changes. Also, you now have business policy effectively embedded in
the database.
The concurrency manager is much more flexible, and keeps the policy where
it probably belongs. However, it is more complex, and there are some
implications to performance when you get to the multiple-thousand-user
range because of its event-based nature.
Another pattern of lock management that has been implemented is a
"key-based" lock manager that does not use events, and may be more
effective at managing this type of concurrency for large numbers of users.
There are too many details to go into here, but I may be able to give you
more ideas in a separate note, if you want.
Don
At 04:48 PM 6/5/97 PDT, Dale "V." Georg wrote:
I have a problem in the application I am currently working on, which it
seems to me should be easily solvable via appropriate use of transactions
and database locking, but I'm having trouble figuring out exactly how to
do it. The database we are using is Oracle 7.2.
The scenario is as follows: We have a window where the user picks an
object from a dropdown list. Some of the object's attributes are then
displayed in that window, and the user then has the option of editing
those attributes, and at some point hitting the equivalent of a 'save'button
to write the changes back to the database. So far, so good. Now
introduce a second user. If user #1 and user #2 both happen to pull up
the same object and start making changes to it, user #1 could write back
to the database and then 15 seconds later user #2 could write back to the
database, completely overlaying user #1's changes without ever knowing
they had happened. This is not good, particularly for our application
where editing the object causes it to progress from one state to the next,
and multiple users trying to edit it at the same time spells disaster.
The first thing that came to mind was to do a select with intent to update,
i.e. 'select * from table where key = 'somevalue' with update'. This way
the next user to try to select from the table using the same key would not
be able to get it. This would prevent multiple users from being able to
pull the same object up on their screens at the same time. Unfortunately,
I can think of a number of problems with this approach.
For one thing, the lock is only held for the duration of the transaction, so
I would have to open a Forte transaction, do the select with intent to
update, let the user modify the object, then when they saved it back again
end the transaction. Since a window is driven by the event loop I can't
think of any way to start a transaction, let the user interact with the
window, then end the transaction, short of closing and re-opening the
window. This would imply having a separate window specifically for
updating the object, and then wrapping the whole of that window's event
loop in a transaction. This would be a different interface than we wanted
to present to the users, but it might still work if not for the next issue.
The second problem is that we are using a pooled DBSession approach
to connecting to the database. There is a single Oracle login account
which none of the users know the password to, and thus the users
simply share DBSession resources. If one user starts a transaction
and does a select with intent to update on one DBSession, then another
user starts a transaction and tries to do the same thing on the same
DBSession, then the second user will get an error out of Oracle because
there's already an open transaction on that DBSession.
At this point, I am still tossing ideas around in my head, but after
speaking with our Oracle/Forte admin here, we came to the conclusion
that somebody must have had to address these issues before, so I
thought I'd toss it out and see what came back.
Thanks in advance for any ideas!
Dale V. Georg
Indus Consultancy Services [email protected]
Mack Trucks, Inc. [email protected]
>
>
>
>
====================================
Don Nelson
Senior Consultant
Forte Software, Inc.
Denver, CO
Corporate voice mail: 510-986-3810
aka: [email protected]
====================================
"I think nighttime is dark so you can imagine your fears with less
distraction." - Calvin

We have taken an optimistic data locking approach. Retrieved values are
stored as initial values; changes are stored seperately. During update, key
value(s) or the entire retieved set is used in a where criteria to validate
that the data set is still in the initial state. This allows good decoupling
of the data access layer. However, optimistic locking allows multiple users
to access the same data set at the same time, but then only one can save
changes, the rest would get an error message that the data had changed. We
haven't had any need to use a pessimistic lock.
Pessimistic locking usually involves some form of open session or DBMS level
lock, which we haven't implemented for performance reasons. If we do find the
need for a pessimistic lock, we will probably use cached data sets that are
checked first, and returned as read-only if already in the cache.
-DFR
Dale V. Georg <[email protected]> on 06/05/97 03:25:02 PM
To: Forte User Group <[email protected]> @ INTERNET
cc: Richards* Debbie <[email protected]> @ INTERNET, Gardner*
Steve <[email protected]> @ INTERNET
Subject: Transactions and Locking Rows for Update
I have a problem in the application I am currently working on, which it
seems to me should be easily solvable via appropriate use of transactions
and database locking, but I'm having trouble figuring out exactly how to
do it. The database we are using is Oracle 7.2.
The scenario is as follows: We have a window where the user picks an
object from a dropdown list. Some of the object's attributes are then
displayed in that window, and the user then has the option of editing
those attributes, and at some point hitting the equivalent of a 'save' button
to write the changes back to the database. So far, so good. Now
introduce a second user. If user #1 and user #2 both happen to pull up
the same object and start making changes to it, user #1 could write back
to the database and then 15 seconds later user #2 could write back to the
database, completely overlaying user #1's changes without ever knowing
they had happened. This is not good, particularly for our application
where editing the object causes it to progress from one state to the next,
and multiple users trying to edit it at the same time spells disaster.
The first thing that came to mind was to do a select with intent to update,
i.e. 'select * from table where key = 'somevalue' with update'. This way
the next user to try to select from the table using the same key would not
be able to get it. This would prevent multiple users from being able to
pull the same object up on their screens at the same time. Unfortunately,
I can think of a number of problems with this approach.
For one thing, the lock is only held for the duration of the transaction, so
I would have to open a Forte transaction, do the select with intent to
update, let the user modify the object, then when they saved it back again
end the transaction. Since a window is driven by the event loop I can't
think of any way to start a transaction, let the user interact with the
window, then end the transaction, short of closing and re-opening the
window. This would imply having a separate window specifically for
updating the object, and then wrapping the whole of that window's event
loop in a transaction. This would be a different interface than we wanted
to present to the users, but it might still work if not for the next issue.
The second problem is that we are using a pooled DBSession approach
to connecting to the database. There is a single Oracle login account
which none of the users know the password to, and thus the users
simply share DBSession resources. If one user starts a transaction
and does a select with intent to update on one DBSession, then another
user starts a transaction and tries to do the same thing on the same
DBSession, then the second user will get an error out of Oracle because
there's already an open transaction on that DBSession.
At this point, I am still tossing ideas around in my head, but after
speaking with our Oracle/Forte admin here, we came to the conclusion
that somebody must have had to address these issues before, so I
thought I'd toss it out and see what came back.
Thanks in advance for
any
ideas!
Dale V. Georg
Indus Consultancy Services [email protected]
Mack Trucks, Inc. [email protected]
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from pebble.Sagesoln.com by notes.bsginc.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9c for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1997Jun05.162418.1771.334203; Thu, 05 Jun 1997 16:24:19 -0500
Received: (from sync@localhost) by pebble.Sagesoln.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id
NAA11825 for forte-users-outgoing; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 13:47:58 -0700
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by pebble.Sagesoln.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id
NAA11819 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 13:47:56 -0700
Received: from unknown(207.159.84.4) by pebble.sagesoln.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma011817; Thu Jun 5 13:47:43 1997
Received: from tes0001.macktrucks.com by relay.macktrucks.com
via smtpd (for pebble.sagesoln.com [206.80.24.108]) with SMTP; 5 Jun
1997 19:35:31 UT
Received: from dale by tes0001.macktrucks.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id QAA04637; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 16:45:51 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Priority: Normal
To: Forte User Group <[email protected]>
Cc: "Richards," Debbie <[email protected]>,
"Gardner," Steve <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dale "V." Georg <[email protected]>
Subject: Transactions and Locking Rows for Update
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 97 16:48:37 PDT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; X-MAPIextension=".TXT"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Dale "V." Georg <[email protected]>

How do I select multiple files under "Get File Info"and lock or unlock all?

How do I select multiple files under "Get File Info"and lock or unlock them all? It seems to do it automatically when I have 10 or more selected. But how do I lock or unlock 5 or 6 files in one swoop? Thanks

Select the desired files then press OPTION and select Show Inspector from the Finder's File menu.
Why reward points?(Quoted from Discussions Terms of Use.)
The reward system helps to increase community participation. When a community member gives you (or another member) a reward for providing helpful advice or a solution to their question, your accumulated points will increase your status level within the community.
Members may reward you with 5 points if they deem that your reply is helpful and 10 points if you post a solution to their issue. Likewise, when you mark a reply as Helpful or Solved in your own created topic, you will be awarding the respondent with the same point values.

Resource busy time out oracle message - Concurrency and Locks

I have a requirement to generate gapless invoice and receipt number in our application. so i have currently used the below approach.
a. created table with a column to hold the invoice and receipt number sequence value.
b. whenever transaction gets succeed. i will lock the table which holds the invoice number and receipt number inorder to avoid the sequential number slipages.
Issue
1. since the application belongs to online payment through portal by customers, when concurrent users trying to pay and while generating receipt number's, i am facing with "resource busy time out" message frequently. Here i noticed when user1 locks the table to access the receipt number value and session is not committed or rollback and another session user2 trying to access the same resource, in this scenario i am facing this error.
Frequency of encountering this error is low, but customer was telling us this error is show stopper and affects normal business.
Is there any alternative solution or method can be applied to overcome this problem?
Current SQL used in application
cursor <cursor name> is.
select <column_name>
into <variable>
from <table name>
for update of wait 5
update <table name> set <column name> = value + 1
where current of <cursor name>

1e0ea4a1-1610-4dec-a44c-4ee1f46ba1a4 wrote:
I have a requirement to generate gapless invoice and receipt number in our application. so i have currently used the below approach.
Engage the business and inquire WHY this "requirement" exists. I have personally never seen an audit requirement wherein invoices MUST be devoid of gaps (that's not to say they do not exist, just that I've never seen one
They certainly must be unique, but that's what a sequence will do for you. If the business absolutely needs gapless information, then they will have to be willing to pay the price which is going to be longer transaction times (as requests queue in a busy system to get this sought after gapless resource). Your job is to explain this to them ... nothing comes without a cost.
The only thing you can really do (assuming you engage the business and the requirement doesn't change) is ensure the transactions are designed in such a manner that
1) they complete as fast as possible AND that the locking is done at the latest possible stage of the transaction
2) there is no user interaction (you cannot allow the users a "review" screen of any sort ... because users get silly sometimes and go for a coffee while reviewing things)
Cheers,

Cannot back up to iCloud. get message my device has not been backed up in 14 weeks you need to be connected to wifi, plugged in and locked" I am all three. I am plugged into the wall via my charger, my wifi is on and i have a pass code what else?

New to iCloud. I only bought the storage to stop getting not enough storage messages. Now I can't back up to iCloud. I get the message "you have not backed up this device in 14 weeks, your device needs to be connected to wifi, locked and plugged in" I connected to wifi and am sitting with my phone about 10" from my modem. I am plugged into my charger which is plugged into the wall. I created a passcode for my phone as I an guessing thats what locked means. However if I am locked I cannot get into the phone to see if it is backing up. So I ask it to back up then let it go off to lock, give it 5 or 10 min to back up and then get back into it only to find its still on estimating time remaining. It won't go any further then that.. What am I doing wrong??

This may not solve your problem but may clear up a couple of things.
1: Re the connected to wi-fi, plugged in and locked thing is for automatic backups. It doesn't need to be plugged in or locked for it to work when you go to Settings > iCloud > Backup and tap Back Up Now. Mine completes the backup quickly without being plugged in or locking (but I don't have a lot to backup).
2: Locked just means the lock screen is on (press the sleep/wake button on top) -- it will work without a passcode (& again, the lock screen on is only required for the automatic backup).
3: You can see what is using your storage and maybe reduce some of it so that you don't have to pay for storage. Instructions in Manage your iCloud storage - Apple Support

Code to set and destroy session variables in Java Server Pages(JSP)

code to set and destroy session variables in Java Server Pages(JSP)
we have use following statement to set session variable
session.setAttribute("userClient",id);
we have use following statement to destroy session variable
session.setAttribute("userClient","");
and
the session.invalidate() is not working
Plz. solve this probem

code to set and destroy session variables in Java
Server Pages(JSP)
we have use following statement to set session
variable
session.setAttribute("userClient",id);
we have use following statement to destroy session
variable
session.setAttribute("userClient","");Perhaps if you tried using
session.setAttribute("userClient", null);
or
session.removeAttribute("userClient");
and
the session.invalidate() is not workingNot working how?
>
Plz. solve this probem

Odd situation with Safari after enabling account expiration and locking

Hi team,
i found the following puzzling situation today.
I enabled account expiration and locking in a workspace, thereafter all end users were requested to change their password as soon as they attempted to login to the application.
Some of these users went through this process smoothly and after changing the password they could log in. Others apparently succeeded in changing the password but the password change process is triggered again and again.
These users are receiving the following message after clicking on "apply changes" (p50 of app 4155).
ERR-1777: Page 50 provided no page to branch to. Please report this error to your application administrator.
When clicking on "restart application", they get the following additional screen:
You have successfully logged out. You have been redirected here after using a logout link provided by an authentication scheme. To redirect to a page in your flow instead, do something like this:
Create a page in your flow and give it an alias PUBLIC_PAGE.
On the Flow Builder page attributes page, select the "Yes - This page is public" Public Page attribute.
Change the logout URL in your authentication template to redirect to this new page after the logout procedure executes. For example, using the API, make your logout URL:
wwv_flow_custom_auth_std.logout?p_this_flow=&FLOW_ID&p_next_flow_page_sess=&FLOW_ID:PUBLIC_PAGE:&SESSION
Note that the suggested URL uses a somewhat outdated syntax lacking the period after the application items, so you might want to revise it for future releases.
After various tests it turned out that the problem is in the browser (don't ask me what).
Safari users do not succeed in changing their passwords through page 4155:50, while Firefox users do.
I have a password change page inside my application though and everybody can change their password from there successfully.
Also, after changing the password using Firefox, Safari users can log in without problems whatsoever.
So the final question is: what's wrong with page 50 of application 4155 when run from Safari on Mac?
It happened with Apex 3.1.2 and Safari Version 3.2.1 (5525.27.1)
Thanks!
Flavio
http://oraclequirks.blogspot.com/search/label/Apex

Scott,
that was exactly what i was about to do yesterday night, but at the post office i realized i didn't know the address :D
Then, fortunately for me, but regrettably for you (hehehe), i realized that Safari is not the culprit.
For some reason people using Safari were always submitting the page with enter, while Firefox users were submitting with the button.
I made a test and Safari is fine as long as you click on the button, the bug is in the submit through the enter key.
Thanks and sorry about the mac air, may be the next time!
Flavio
PS: aren't you coming to ODTUG Kaleidoscope?

How to check Locking sessions in oracle 10g

Hi,
I have tried to get locking sessions. i got the blocking session by using v$lock view.
Pls help how to get locking sessions.
Regards,
Venkat

Hi Venkat
Or just run this independent of database version
select a.sid blocker, 'is blocking the session ', b.sid blockee from v$lock a, v$lock b
where a.block =1 and b.request > 0 and a.id1=b.id1 and a.id2=b.id2;You can extend this query to find the username and machine (plus all other details) from v$session using the a.sid and b.sid from above
To find the blocking session_
SELECT S.SID, S.SQL_ID, S.USERNAME, S.MACHINE from
V$SESSION S WHERE S.SID = (SELECT blocker from
(select a.sid blocker, 'is blocking the session ', b.sid blockee from v$lock a, v$lock b
where a.block =1 and b.request > 0 and a.id1=b.id1 and a.id2=b.id2
*_To find the blocked session_*SELECT S.SID, S.SQL_ID, S.USERNAME, S.MACHINE from
V$SESSION S WHERE S.SID = (SELECT blockee from
(select a.sid blocker, 'is blocking the session ', b.sid blockee from v$lock a, v$lock b
where a.block =1 and b.request > 0 and a.id1=b.id1 and a.id2=b.id2
Edited : Added blocker and blockee code

I bought a refurbished HP P2-1013W and it will show some blue lines on the screen and lock up.

I purchased this pc in April but did not take it out of the box until recently. Set it up for my parents and it keep getting the blue lines and locking up. There is no particular situation that causes it to freeze. I did the system restore to factor defaults, worked fine for a couple of days and now it is doing it again.

Hello ddolson69,
To rule out the monitor as being the issue we need to first test it on another machine. If the problem persists there we know the monitor is the cause. If the monitor works fine then we know we have the issue with the system.
Are you using an integrated video card or are you using a video card that has been added to a PCI slot?
Open the computer up check the fans and ensure all fans are working properly and that there is adequate air flow within the machine.
If it's dirty inside clean it out with a can of compressed air. Pay particular attention to the heat sink and any fans that may be attached or around the video card.
If I have helped you in any way click the Kudos button to say Thanks.
The community works together, click Accept as Solution on the post that solves your issue for other members of the community to benefit from the solution.
- Friendship is magical.

[SOLVED] KDevelop 4 and locked session

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for