[SOLVED] Virtualbox-host-dkms module not compatible with Linux 3.17rc

Using the linux-mainline package from aur, was unable to get dkms to compile the vboxdrv module. Mainline is currently at around 3.17rc3, didn't work at rc1 either.
Apparently a patch has already been made, it is available at:
https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic … 50#p296650
Loaded the abs system and applied the patch from the forum:
https://forums.virtualbox.org/download/ … p?id=13399
Patch works like a charm. I have compiled the package, if anyone else would like to save some cpu cycles and time, I wouldn't mind uploading it if there is somewhere it can be posted.

Ideka wrote:I suspect this may be a regression but I couldn't find any information or reports of other people having the same problem anywhere.
You must not have searched very long then, because you've missed not one, but two threads:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=134374
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=134580

Similar Messages

Is adobe creative not compatible with linux ?

Is adobe creative not compatible with linux ?

Windows Server 2012 is not an officially supported OS but it might work.
For reference each application has a Tech Spec link on its product page. From the Creative Cloud Apps page at https://creative.adobe.com/apps click on the Learn More link to go to the product page and you will see the Tech Spec link in the top menu.
There is a free 30 day trial for the applications. You can try them out on a Windows Server 2012 machine and see if they work to your satisfaction.

Workstation 11.1, Tools 9.9.2 build-2496486: Not compatible with GCC 5.1.0 on linux (Arch, Debian, Ubuntu, etc)

First, there are some compilation problems with the latest linux kernel and Tools 9.9.2's source of vmhgfs: vmhgfs module not compilable for VMware Tools 9.9.0 (Fusion7.1) after Ubuntu Linux kernel update to 3.13.0-46-generic (Febr. 2015) (Shared Folder Feature not working in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Guest) on MacOSX Yosemite (Host))?
In short, you have to patch the source to get it to compile: rasa/vmware-tools-patches · GitHub
Arch linux is a "rolling" distro, meaning we always have latest - and are usually the first to find problems before it trickles down to Ubuntu, Mint, Debian and other Linux distros. Well, now there is a serious problem that is unresolvable.
The vmhgfs source is not compatible with linux kernels built with gcc 5.1.0. It hard locks the VM, requiring a hard reset when the kernel module loads. It also hard locks during vmware-tools-install.pl torwards the very end when it says, "Guest filesystem driver" enabling. And on boot, it is vmhgfs that is being loaded when the VM hard locks.
I was able to get around this earlier when gcc 4.9.2 was in core - i just rebuilt the kernel under 4.9.2: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=196915
Obviously that isn't a long-term solution. But now that gcc 5.1.0 has been pushed out to core, that means recompiling the kernel under 4.9.2 is no easy feat since dependencies now depend on gcc 5.1.0.
@Developers: We have a big problem with VMware Tools vmhgfs and kernels compiled under gcc 5.1.0. Given it make take years before the Debian distros get the latest and greatest, it's coming.
Because of this, and the wasted time in me having to support this mess, I may recommend to my company we no longer continue with our Enterprise account of 100 licenses of Workstation and Fusion. It is obvious in the previous thread vmhgfs module not compilable for VMware Tools 9.9.0 (Fusion7.1) after Ubuntu Linux kernel update to 3.13.0-46-generic (Febr. 2015) (Shared Folder Feature not working in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Guest) on MacOSX Yosemite (Host))? that VMware is no hurry to resolve even the simple build errors that the community has resolved last year with patches. Good thing too, renewal comes up in two months.
I shiver to think how long it will take VMware to release a fix for gcc 5.1.0.

Additional info...
The hard lock is a panic when mounting the /mnt/hgfs partition, which is what is configured in my fstab:
.host:/
/mnt/hgfs
vmhgfs
defaults
0 0
The reason the above is just "./host:/" is for the auto-mounting of shares on the fly, or all shares on boot. Specifying a share doesn't change anything.
Even mounting it manually panic's the kernel:
mount -n -t vmhgfs .host:/<shared_folder> /home/user1/shares
Again, this all worked fine with a kernel built on 4.9.2, but not 5.1.0.

The security module of these banks: "Banco do Brasil", "Santander" and "Caixa Econômica Federal" are not compatibles with firefox 4.0

the security module of these banks: "Banco do Brasil", "Santander" and "Caixa Econômica Federal" are not compatibles with firefox 4.0

the security module of these banks: "Banco do Brasil", "Santander" and "Caixa Econômica Federal" are not compatibles with firefox 4.0

Error :"The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client"

Hi guys!
I'm facing this problem:
When my .Net application tries to access the DB, I get this error message above.
The application is into the same machine of DB and the operational system is Windows Server Enterprise 64 bits.
I'm comparing to another machine that has the same scenario but runs in Windows Vista 64 bits. This problem doesn't happen and I can normally access the DB.
The both database versions are 10g Release 2 (10.2) and all components from Oracle Database Components 10.2.0.2.21 are installed as the containing bellow:
-Oracle Data Provider for .NET 1.x 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Data Provider for .NET 2.0 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET 2003 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio 2005 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Provider for OLE DB 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Objects for OLE 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Services For Microsoft Transaction Server 10.2.0.1.0
-Oracle Net 10.2.0.1.0
-Oracle Universal Installer 10.2.0.2.0
Oracle.DataAcces.DLL is 2.102.2.20 and it is reference in my .Net app (that is published and located into IIS).
These are the Oracle assemblies installes in 'C:\Windows\Assembly':
Windows Vista Machine:
ASSEMBLY NAME VERSION CULTURE PUBLIC KEY TOKEN PROCESS ARCHITECTURE
Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 pt-BR 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 it 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 fr 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 es 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 de 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.Management.Omo 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
Oracle.VsDevTools 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
Policy.10.1.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Policy.10.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Windows Server Machine:
ASSEMBLY NAME VERSION CULTURE PUBLIC KEY TOKEN PROCESS ARCHITECTURE
Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 pt-BR 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 zh-CHT 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 zh-CHS 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 ko 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 jp 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 it 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 fr 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 es 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 de 89b483f429c47342
Policy.10.1.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Policy.10.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Policy.9.2.Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Policy.9.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
What should I check and do to solve this problems?
Thanks for help,
Anderson

Hi,
Often the error "The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client" is raised when the unmanaged dll OraOpsX.dll can't be found, can't be loaded, or is the wrong version. For version 10.2.0.x of ODP.NET and .NET Framework 2.x the file should be called "OraOps10w.dll" and should be found in the %ORACLE_HOME%\bin directory.
Since the ODAC pieces are installed on the same host as the database, are they in a separate Oracle Home or the same Oracle Home as the database software? If there are multiple Oracle Home directories, which one is in the system path first?
I would start with verifying the version of OraOps10w.dll and the system path on the server. You might also confirm that the Oracle Home directory (and everything under it) has the following permissions for Authenticated Users:
- Read & Execute
- List folder contents
- Read
Regards,
Mark

Error 2000 - The server is not compatible with this deployment client

I'm getting an error trying to deploy a composite. It works for everyone else on the team, and our configurations are the same (as far as we can tell). We've compared JDev version info.
Any idea what I can try? Thank you.
[12:57:48 PM] ---- Deployment started. ----
[12:57:48 PM] Target platform is (Weblogic 10.3).
[12:57:48 PM] Running dependency analysis...
[12:57:48 PM] Building...
[12:58:05 PM] Deploying profile...
[12:58:06 PM] Wrote Archive Module to C:\pkgs\svn\mdm\trunk\src\DRM WDK Source Code\Workflows\DrmRequestWorkflowSelection\deploy\sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar
[12:58:06 PM] Deploying sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar to partition "default" on server soa_server1 [http://10.22.2.40:8001]
[12:58:06 PM] Processing sar=/C:/pkgs/svn/mdm/trunk/src/DRM WDK Source Code/Workflows/DrmRequestWorkflowSelection/deploy/sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar
[12:58:06 PM] Adding sar file - C:\pkgs\svn\mdm\trunk\src\DRM WDK Source Code\Workflows\DrmRequestWorkflowSelection\deploy\sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar
[12:58:06 PM] Preparing to send HTTP request for deployment
[12:58:06 PM] Creating HTTP connection to host:10.22.2.40, port:8001
[12:58:06 PM] Sending internal deployment descriptor
[12:58:06 PM] Sending archive - sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar
[12:58:07 PM] Error deploying archive sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar to partition "default" on server soa_server1 [http://10.22.2.40:8001]
*[12:58:07 PM] HTTP error code returned [2000]*
*[12:58:07 PM] Error message from server:*
The server is not compatible with this deployment client: please verify that the server is a SOA managed server and that its version is supported by this deployment client
[12:58:07 PM] Check server log for more details.
[12:58:07 PM] Error deploying archive sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar to partition "default" on server soa_server1 [http://10.22.2.40:8001]
[12:58:07 PM] #### Deployment incomplete. ####
[12:58:07 PM] Error deploying archive file:/C:/pkgs/svn/mdm/trunk/src/DRM WDK Source Code/Workflows/DrmRequestWorkflowSelection/deploy/sca_DrmRequestWorkflowSelectionComposite_rev3.0.jar
(oracle.tip.tools.ide.fabric.deploy.common.SOARemoteDeployer)
Edited by: J Keller on Jun 6, 2013 8:03 AM

Can anyone reply plz???

Firefox 3.6 not compatible with home directories stored on AFP file server

I just wanted to let everyone know that I have discovered, at least in my situation, that Firefox 3.6 does not work with user home directories stored on AFP file servers.
My network consists of PPC 10.411 clients and a Mac OS X 10.62 server. User home directories are stored on the server, the user is logged into a "Golden Triangle" LDAP domain, where the Mac clients bind to a OSX Server and the OSX Server is a member of the Active Directory domain.
Worked perfectly fine on Firefox 3.57, now in 3.6 it will either not launch, will freeze with the beachball or will only show the Firefox window and not the main web browser.
This has happened before with a 3.0x update from a few months ago. I have posted a bug in the Bugzilla database and have outlined the bug on my personal MacPCSMB blog.
http://www.macpcsmb.com
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542306
Thanks
Michael Yockey
IT Administrator
Yockey, Yockey and Schliem PC

There is an update on the FireFox hosted AFP issue that I have uncovered:
When users are rolled back with Firefox 3.57 (by installing FF 3.57 over 43.6) the following issue occurs:
You launch Firefox and you get an error that states "XML scripting is not working; Firefox cannot open the window".
This basically means that the plug-ins for Firefox 3.6 are still in the user's Firefox profile directory. These new plug-ins are not compatible with Firefox 3.57. You will have to manually go into the user's home directory and remove their profile folder and extract a specific file. The issue is that the user will have to be able to have access to their bookmarks. If you delete the profile folder their bookmarks are gone, though that is simpler to do.
It looks like Mozilla significantly changed the profile folder setup in FF 3.6, so a profile rollback or deletion is necessary.
If you DO NOT have a good backup:
To solve this issue do the following. This guide assumes you have the users home directory stored on an AFP server and you have open directory logins:
1. The Firefox profile is located here according to Mozilla: http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Profiles . The Mac OS X Directory is located at /~username/library/application support/Firefox.
2. Find and COPY the places.sqlite file. This is the Firefox bookmarks and history database. This file is very important to back up.
3. Now take the user's Firefox profile and TRASH it.
4. Now either have the user launch Firefox with their Open Directory login, or change their password and login yourself. Open Firefox and then after it full loads quit the program. Copy the places.sqlite file back into the Firefox profile folder. You will have to do this manually for every user unless if you make an AppleScript to take care of this.
5. The program will now work again.
The second option is to go into Retrospect or Time Machine (or whatever backup solution you use) and restore the user's profile direct to a point in time before Firefox was updated to 3.6 and then subsequently reverted back to 3.57. How to use backup software is way beyond the scope of this blog posting.
Thanks
Mike Yockey
www.MacPCSMB.com

The shared library is not compatible with this version of itunes

I have a G3 running Jaguar (and iTunes 6) that hosts my MP3 collection. Until recently, this worked great as a shared library, happily showing up in iTunes on other machines on my network, including my Powerbook.
Then I got iTunes 8 on my MacBook Pro.
Now, when I try to access it from my MBP with Leopard, I get the message "the shared library Nick's Music is not compatible with this version of itunes".
Can I somehow run an older version of iTunes as well as v 8.0 on Leopard?
Is there another program that can access that library and run on Leopard?
Any other solutions?

I solved it myself...What I did was to backup the old library, run iTunes 6 to create a new library, move that new library, edit iTunes 6 preferences to use the library in it's new location, then restore the iTunes 8 library to it's original position.

'The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client error' popping up randomly

I have several asp.net pages running on an application server which generally work without issue. However I've had the Server error "The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client error" crop up twice seemingly randomly that affects all of my pages that interact with the DB server. A simple reboot of the application server solves the issue and the pages run again with no problems. What could be causing this problem?

Sorry if I wasn't clear initially. Basically I've got 2 different applications in 2 different IIS folders on the webserver, each with several asp.net pages. They work fine for a period of time and then inexplicably that error gets thrown and affects all of my asp.net pages in both applications. The admin tells me that the other older applications on the same server are unaffected. A simple reboot of the server fixes the issue until the next time it happens (I can't identify any consistent point where this crash happens, the admin originally suggested that there might be something in my code causing a memory issue). I had the same applications hosted on my local machine for a time and this never happened as well as it never happening when I run them in localhost. How can I trace whether or not another part of my application is trying to load ODP.NET by itself? How can I verify the DLL search order for my application?

Failure to Load Project: OA Express Datatypes not Compatible with SignalExpress 2014

Hi,
since a few days now, I am trying to get SignalExpress 2014 Full running on my workstation. I deinstalled and reinstalled all National Instruments components multiple times, but I always receive the following error (see also the picture attached) when I try to open a certain project:
Failure to load project
Installed component versions are not compatible with the version of the SignalExpress 2014. Please install the latest versions of the following:
1) OA Express Datatypes
Previously, there was also "DAQ Assistant" mentioned in the list of missing components/components with incompatible versions, but I could solve this with installaing NI-DAQmx. But I could not find anything looking for "OA Express Datatypes" --- I neither know in what package this component is located nor what the purpose of this component is.
Any help is appreciated.

Just did a downgrade and it's working again, here are my versions.
linux 3.9.9-1
linux-headers 3.9.9-1
nvidia 319.32-2
nvidia-utils 319.32-1
bbswitch 0.7-4
If you have conflicts, I found it easiest to remove those (bbswitch, virtualbox in my case), downgrade linux and then install the appropriate bbs/vb packages

I installed a new printer and now Photoshop Elements tells me I can't print. The error message is "The saved printer information is not compatible with this version of Photoshop Elements, or the saved printer is no longer available. You will need to che

I installed a new printer and now Photoshop Elements tells me I can't print. The error message is "The saved printer information is not compatible with this version of Photoshop Elements, or the saved printer is no longer available. You will need to check your printer settings before printing." I have uninstalled and re-installed Photoshop Elements, checked my printer settings and still I can't print a photo.

Hi ,
Please update to PSE 13.1
13.1 has solved this problem.
Refer to this link.
Photoshop Elements Help | Printer errors with Photoshop Elements 13

Need lightroom 4.4 asmac is 10.6.8 and not compatible with anything higher. Does this come with the creative cloud? Would really like a disc but that doesn't seem to happen anymore. Currently have cs4 and d7100 hence need 4.4 to open raw Any idea

need lightroom 4.4 asmac is 10.6.8 and not compatible with anything higher. Does this come with the creative cloud? Would really like a disc but that doesn't seem to happen anymore. Currently have cs4 and d7100 hence need 4.4 to open raw Any ideas? Is this now customer service or does adobe have a customer service team . Site not user friendly. Thanks

Graham Giles wrote:
Have you seen this type of problem before? I think it could be a serious issue for anyone in a similar position.
No; but then, I've not had occasion to use TDM. I've been using firerwire drives for over 10 years, both FW400 and FW800, with no issues except a bit of instability using a B&W G3 machine.
TDM should be safe. Using cautious, manual copying of files from the Target machine to the Host machine should not result in unexpected loss of files or damage to the Target drive's directories. It should behave exactly the same as if it were an external (to the Host) firewire drive.
• I don't suppose there is anything I can do to 'put back' lost items from a separate Time Machine drive which has an up to date backup on it.
There is probably a way to do that - seems to me that's one of the reasons for a Time Machine volume.
On the other hand, if the Time Machine volume is rigidly linked to the now-absent OS on the original drive, there may be no way to effectively access the files in the TM archive.
I know that using a cloned drive would work well in this instance.
I have no experience with Time Machine, so perhaps someone who has will chime in with suggestions.
With the machine in TDM with the other machine, have you tried running Disk Utility to see if you can effect repairs to the drive?

IPhoto not compatible with OSX Yosemite

I have a MacBook Pro (17 inch, early 2011) with a 2GHz Intel Core i7 and 4 GB 1333 MHz DDR3.
A few weeks ago I downloaded the Yosemite operating system (10.10.3). Since then, my iPhoto application will not open. I can't save pictures to my computer from my phone and I can't edit pictures I've imported. When I try to open iPhoto, it says: "In order to open "iPhoto", you need to update to the latest version. The version of iPhoto installed on this Mac is not compatible with OS X Yosemite. Download the latest version for free from the Mac Apple Store."
I search the app store for iPhoto and no updates are available. The message displayed is: " The item you've requested is not currently available in the US store."
Anyone know what to do to solve this? I really need to be able to edit photos. Thanks for helping!

You need iPhoto 9.6.1 for use with 10.10.3. Try the method Terence Posted in this topic to get it from the App Store:
Terence Devlin including Apple logo changes for feature 126 Apple image including Apple logo changes for feature 126 Apple image ends here
Apr 14, 2015 11:21 AM
Re: Is Iphoto gone ? i want it back!
in response to Johannes666
Recommended
[DocumentBodyStart:d25bf602-029a-4466-b895-2ab6c98bb4c9]
Go to the App Store and check out the Purchases List. If iPhoto is there then it will be v9.6.1
If it is there, then drag your existing iPhoto app (not the library, just the app) to the trash
Install the App from the App Store.
Sometimes iPhoto is not visible on the Purchases List. it may be hidden. See this article for details on how to unhide it.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4928
One question often asked: Will I lose my Photos if I reinstall?
iPhoto the application and the iPhoto Library are two different parts of the iPhoto programme. So, reinstalling the app should not affect the Library. BUT you should always have a back up before doing this kind of work. Always.
Otherwise you can drag your iPhoto Library onto the Photos app icon in the Dock to covert it to a Photos library.

Error: xulrunner version 1.9.2.1o not compatible with firefox 3.6.12 min/maxVersion 1.9.2.12

Loaded firefox 3.6.12 from scratch. It won't start, popping up an XULRunner dialog box that says :Error: Platform version '1.9.2.10' is not compatible with minVersion >= 1.9.2.12 maxVersion <= 1.9.2.12. How do I get proper version of XULRunner so Firefox recognizes it?

Hi
I had the same problem but with version 1.9.2.15
I found many people with the same issue doing a Google research and all seem to solve it with a clean reinstall. However:
inside your installation directory (where firefox.exe is) check for the file platform.ini
if you don’t have one, please create it.
Edit the newly created platform.ini or the existing one with a text editor
add the following 2 lines
[Build]
Milestone=X.X.X.X
replace the X.X.X.X with the version number from the error massage. This worked in my case

Cannot open Firefox due to this message: Error: Platform version "6.0.2" is not compatible with minVersion =6.0.1 maxVersion =6.0.1

I cannot open Mozilla Firefox. Instead, a XULRunner dialog box appears with the message: Error: Platform version "6.0.2" is not compatible with minVersion >=6.0.1 maxVersion<=6.0.1 edit
Can you please tell me how to solve this problem? I have been running Mozilla Firefox on my Dell laptop with Windows 7 os.
Thanks

If you use ZoneAlarm Extreme Security then try to disable Virtualization.
Do a clean reinstall and delete the Firefox program folder.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser_will_not_start_up#XULRunner_error_after_an_update
*[[/questions/869812]]
*[[/questions/869951]]

[SOLVED] Virtualbox-host-dkms module not compatible with Linux 3.17rc

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for