Something Better than iWeb?

I'm looking for a website program for the Mac that is as easy as iWeb but can build sites more like dreamweaver. I don't like iWeb because it's too private, family, media, mac like. Are there any programs for the Mac other than iWeb that are like this? (Without the confusing HTML).

Sandvox is fairly similar to iWeb and has a Pro version with added features...
http://www.karelia.com/
You could also have a look at Goldfish...
http://www.fishbeam.com/en/goldfish/
Shutterbug has a kind of quirky interface but has a lot of good features and is inexpensive....
http://xtralean.com/SBOverview.html

Similar Messages

  • Something better than the 'shear' filter..

    Hi, I am looking for something better than this primitive 'shear' filter. I need to shape an image with the help of a curve, just like in shear, but more professional than just with a vertical line inside a teeny-weeny window... Any ideas..? Curently working in Photoshop CS3.

    How can I add more curve points in Warp..?
    Unfortunately one can not, therefore the Illustrator Envelope Distort-recommendation.
    CS5 is supposed to offer improvements in this field … but no release-date has been announced yet.

  • Creating something better than Photoshop CC ?

    The basic CC concept  just doesn't work for many people, including myself. Bottom line: there must be a  perpetual license option for a basic photo image editing program. For many photographers, Photoshop Elements just isn't robust enough. My guess is that other companies will jump into this huge new market, but that's going to take time.
    It looks like Adobe is the only company in the position to produce a solution in the short term. So let's start there.
    Over at the Kelby Blog and NAPP (the "Photoshop Guys," NAPP memebers and Blog contributors) they are actually working on a product concept to present to Adobe in response to CC. It's initially being called "LightShop" and its basic premise is to be a stripped-down Photoshop CC that integrates with Lightroom.  It will have minimal Type, no 3D, no video, and less special effects and other bloat -- just a clear Lightroom-like interface that is smooth and fast. Most important, it sells as a perpetual license like Lightroom, for under $200. This concept sounds interesting -- if you're into Lightroom. I'm not.
    Another idea is for Adobe to offer something like a Photoshop Elements "Extended Edition." Now that they have killed the Standard Edition of Photoshop, a product like that would not encroach upon the now professional market focus of Photoshop CC. It would be relatively easy to produce because most of the code is already in Photoshop Elements for more advanced features  -- it's just turned off. ACR already comes with Elements, and Bridge could be included as before.  If some of the deficiencies of standard Elements could be addressed, and some of the consumer oriented bling thrown out, then it could be ideal for amateur to semi-pro photographers. Photoshop plug-ins would work as they do now. Sell a perpetual license for under $200, and I think a lot of non-CC customers would be happy. An upgrade from CS3 onwards would be great too, for maybe $100.
    But exactly what features would be best for a Photoshop CC alternative product? Is 16-bit necessary if you are global-editing RAW in ACR or Lightroom? Can you really tell the difference in a print or on the Web? What about Blend Modes -- do we need that many? How about just one sharpening filter -- the upcoming version of Smart Sharpen?

    You bring up a great point. Lets say when we eventually die and lets say our family or even clients want to see what we have done. Adobe with cc in a way has cut off your legacy by not having a perpetual program that can automatically open your files. Which is different from saving as older file type.
    If cc had more price options i would be very temped to join it. Ither a 30-40$/month plan for say a suite as they have done for years or pick your favorite 3 programs and 1-2 minior ones like bridge or acrobat. I would also like to see a 10-15/month plan for just 1 program but that is not a special offer but long standing price. Im sure the cc price will change within the next 12 months which is for good or bad why you can only lock in a 1 year plan. It would be nice if like a phone you could lock in your plan price for 2 years. At least you would know what to expect. Adobe should look at phone subscriptions and see how we get people to pay 90/month for a phone which for many is a toy and they cant get people to pay 50/month for tools. With phones when you renew your contract gennerally every 2 years you get a massive discount on some new phones and some will actaully be free or upto 70% off. Adobe shoudl consider this. The more adobe products you have the bigger your renew discount should be. They could do it as 2 year contract or have several durations besides monthly and yearly. Have a 6 month, 18 and 24 month. Say you pay 50/month for your contract duration of 1 year, when it comes time to renew you should have a discount lets say 10-20% off which would be 40-45$ which is handy. If you upgrade to cc and have a suite you should have a biggerest discount than just 1 program say instead of 40/month like 30/month for that contract duration and if you have master collection maybe 20/month for the duration. Then with those 2 suites when its time to renew still give a discount but maybe less. Maybe a suite becomes 40/month and master 30/month but give more discount than those who just renewed. Give us what feels like incentives not punishments.
    Ya having 3 almost 4 photoshops was getting a big crazy. Photoshop extended, photohop, photoshop elements and light room. I guess its good for adobe to consolidate but they could have done it with out the cloud. Just make elements and lightroom merged and bump up the price maybe 40%. I think thats fair. Similarly with photoshop and extended, merge the 2 and increase price to 1/2 way between both. Starts getting weird when you have many overlapping things. Like web design has dream weaver and muse. I would love to get that as 1 program or a package deal since they do the same thing but go about it differently. Merge them as 1 and increase price 40%. Same with indesign and incopy, merge them together and increase price 40%. This will make each program stronger and a better buy. Just good house keeping to simplify. Adobe offers so many things I honestly dont know what some of their new things like fusion do. Many have only been around 1-2 years and its becoming complicated to know about all their stuff especially when they start overlapping.
    Good luck adobe. I do love you but you are breaking my heart. I want to stay but you need to make some changes to help me want to.

  • Email Set-up...something better than Outlook Express 4.5?

    Happy New Year ~
    I'm trying to set up about 3 email accounts on an OLD iBook Blueberry running OS 8.6. It has Outlook Express 4.5 installed on it, and though it did "take" one of the email addresses yesterday (it was able to download mail from the server, but I didn't test sending any mail out), it hasn't been able to send/receive at all today. I'm not real familiar with Outlook, so don't know if I'm missing something. I tried checking two boxes that said things like: "Requires secure SSL/POP" because I do have passwords that are involved in accessing the server account, but still nothing.
    The computer did connect to the internet via ethernet and DSL, though, so that's not the problem.
    Anyway -- after all this, I'm wondering if there's any simpler email program I can maybe try downloading and using? Or any other suggestions?
    (I'm just spoiled, having been graced with an iBookG4 less than a year ago - my first Mac - and loving Panther and OS X..I'd love to upgrade to Tiger as soon as my budget allows)
    Thanks for any and all insight.
    iBook Blueberry   Mac OS 8.6 or Earlier   G3, 300MHz, 32MB DSRAM, OS 8.6

    Hi aToast...
    Yikes! ...your comment brings back a lot of memories - good and bad
    For some reason I do remember that you shouldn't have to check off the 'Requires Secure SSL/POP'. Aside from that just make sure you have both your incoming/outgoing 'mail server' and of course your password typed correctly.
    There are other programs you could try (I remember trying others but Outlook was always the best for me) ...take a look under the 'classic apps' on the Pure-Mac site for example - http://pure-mac.com/email.html
    If you could get up to os 9.2.2 then try the Mozilla Suite - that would be my pick for best classic browser and email combo.
    ibook Clamshell (Indigo)   Mac OS X (10.3.9)   40Gig - 320Ram - DVD/CDRW

  • Need sodium vapor frequency specific filter something better than plain  orange

    Somebody tell the LIGHTROOM PHOTOSHOP TEAM THAT WE NEED A FREQUENCY SPECIFIC FILTER THAT TARGETS THE SODIUM VAPOR SPECIFIC FREQUENCY TO FILTER OUT THAT LIGHT POLLUTION IMMEDIATELY

    Just click Black & White. You cannot create with a filter what's not there in the first place.
    When you filter out all of that specific frequeny, no normal color information will remain. You'll only retain the contrast information (which you can bump nicely with Clarity).
    P.S. I think something went wrong with your Caps Lock or Shift key, maybe you should check it for glue or chewing gum.

  • Anyne know something better than iLap? Please

    just bought one. still feelin some major heat coming off the laptop. def can't keep it on my lap for long.
    anyone heard of belkin cushtop? other?
    thnx

    well, i use both idrum and guru. guru is crazy cool with alot if the stuff it can do, way too much. but to hit the highlites and comparison to ultrabeat(mainly the things it does that UB doesnt):
    you have a sound browser where you can click the sounds and hear them and not blindy have to load samples in
    the patterns are easily drag-able into the instrument track one created(stylus style)
    the editing PER HIT in the patterns is crazy as well, can edit shift(if youd like that beat not exactly ON the grid, you can slide its position around) as well as any of the other parameters can be tweaked per beat (filtering, pitch, volume, pan, sample-start point and repeat triggers for glitch effect)
    the application of 'feels' you can use (MPC swings, etc...)
    there really is alot you can do with it, waaaay more in depth than idrum and waaaaay easier to use the UB:-)
    my 2 cents!

  • Is there something better than CMD+Z for mass UNDOs?

    After a month of superb Macprovideo training in FCPX and futile searches of the "worthless" FCPX help[less] document, I cannot find more on a VERY BASIC subject that pertains to everybody using FCPX.
    EDITING HISTORY:  Since we have NO control over our SAVES,  how do you undo the last 50 changes --or-- undo everything since 10am?  Do I have to hit CMD+Z until I get callouses?   I did see a reference to TIMELINE HISTORY but the doc is skimpy & doesn't  seem relevant.
    If there is a window that shows a chronological order of changes & time with the option to UNDO, that would be great.   If I've missed it, please advise.
    Thank you for time & thoughts.
    -Dale

    Thank you R&B, you're an officer & a gentleman.
    BTY- I can never figure out why folks on this (and all other forums) have ALIAS names.  If they don't know you by your real name, then I can't see the purpose of an alias.

  • Something is better than nothing.

    Congrats! keep it up ! 

    Recvieved my first credit card from Capital One in October of 2012 following Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. They started me off with a limit of $300 and auto increased me to $500 six months after. Over the past three years i've gotten no increases from them until tonight. I hit the luv button expecting a denial but was surprised to see a $100 increase. While it may not be a lot, something is better than nothing

  • Open DNS better than Comcast xfinity DNS?

    Is OpenDNS better than using Comcast/xfinity's DNS? If yes, how do I switch over?
    I go to into Airport Utility and enter in the 2 openDNS numbers, something like 222 and 220, but at the bottom of the page right now (because I am using Comcast's DNS) there's a web address something.comcast.net  Do I need to change that info too? If so, what do I put in that field?
    Thanks!

    How did you add them?
    If you are using a single computer: Open System Preferences/Network. Double click on your connection type, or select it in the drop-down menu, and in the box marked 'DNS Servers' add the following two numbers:
    208.67.222.222
    208.67.220.220
    (You can also enter them if you click on Advanced and then DNS)
    Sometimes reversing the order of the DNS numbers can be beneficial in cases where there is a long delay before web pages start to load, and then suddenly load at normal speed:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2296
    If your computer is part of a network: please refer to this page: http://www.opendns.com/start/bestpractices/#yournetwork and follow the advice given.
    (An explanation of why using Open DNS is both safe and a good idea can be read here: http://www.labnol.org/internet/tools/opendsn-what-is-opendns-why-required-2/2587 /
    Open DNS also provides an anti-phishing feature: http://www.opendns.com/solutions/homenetwork/anti-phishing/ )
    Wikipedia also has an interesting article about Open DNS:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDNS

  • Why Annyconecct is better than vpn client ?

    why anyconnect is better than cisco vpn client ?
    what is its advangatges ?
    i think that both are remoteaccess vpn .
    why its better ?

    The other thing is that, Cisco does not support traditional VPN on Windows 8.X.  I have run in to lots of issues trying to install  Cisco VPN client on Windows 8.x clients..  it sometimes work and sometimes it needs registry hacks etc.. really painful setup for the network engineer.  So Anyconnect is preffered.
    Also, since SSL uses port 443/SSL by default,  it does not need any ALG (Application Layer Gateway) functionality in remote end user's routers to operate, and will simply work with normal PAT which is always on..  with traditional IPSec VPN, since it uses ESP, you need to have AGL turned on on the user's GW router (this is normally called IPSec VPN pass through mode) and this sometimes doesn't work the way you want specially on the older residential routers. When this happens you really don't have any other option for those users.. and your only response would be "Sorry your router does not support this kind of VPN  or  your router does something strange with the VPN  so Please upgrade your router" which is something the normal residential user don't want to hear.. and something you want to tell them..
    So SSL VPN is the way to go..
    please rate helpful posts :) 

  • What's better than Illustrator?

    I've been using Illustrator for many years and several versions.  My usage is nominal and occasional/once a week, and I don't get very sophisticated for my needs, so it has been OK so far. I do not do commercial work but know Ai is the "de-facto std".
    But I read this forum often and see many criticisms of Ai and I do have occasional issues with Illy with tools and UI....just not as easy or robust as it could/should be...cumbersome at times.
    I see JET and others here make great use of Illy but also criticize (justifiably) it for not being as good as other vector tools.
    I know there are competitors, Inkscape is free, others less costly than Illy; and seemingly better/easier/faster to use...at least for some things.
    So my question: What is better than Illustrator (I'm using CS5) and why? What can they do better than Ai?  Is it worth having a second program and learning (tho I suspect the learning curve should be easy as they do similar things but have different GUI).  Or replacing Illy with something?
    Pro's/Con's that would make one make the effort to try/use something else?  I don't even know what out there is better than Illy.  I've searched www and got a few hints but nothing very significant.
    Am I wasting my time looking?
    Your feedback welcomed to help me decide whether to explore/trial other programs.

    I see JET and others here...criticize (justifiably) it for not being as good as other vector tools.
    I can't speak for "and others", but since I'm the only one you mention by name:
    If you've already deemed the criticism justifiable, then you must already know what that criticism says. When I criticize Illustrator, I don't just say "Illustrator is crap" and leave it at that, unsupported. I'm careful to explain myself with facts pertinent to the context of the discussion. I actually own and know how to use the other programs to which I compare. I've often posted lists of comparitive features.
    I've always used my real name here and sign all my posts with my initials. So finding my comments is not difficult.
    I know there are competitors, Inkscape is free, others less costly than Illy; and seemingly better/easier/faster to use...at least for some things. So my question: What is better than Illustrator (I'm using CS5) and why? What can they do better than Ai?
    Didn't you just answer your own question? Other than the broadly general things you just mentioned, what program do you want to compare, and for doing what? Surely you're not asking someone to do an exhaustive feature-by-feature comparison between Illustrator and all similar programs in this one thread?
    All you've said about what you use Illustrator for is that your use is nominal, occasional, unsophisticated, and non-commerical. Mine isn't. Commerical graphics has been my livelihood for over 40 years. Vector-based illustration is both a speciality and a passion.
    I...knowAi is the "de-facto std"
    "Defacto standard" is self-fulfilling. It's effectively equivalent to saying "More people use Illustrator because more people use Illustrator."
    So what? More people ride Vespa scooters than KTM motorcycles. But which one would you call "professional quality"? You can use either one to pick up a gallon of orange juice at the corner store. But if you enter an enduro, the KTM will get the job done with alot less stress.
    The myth is that most software buyers choose the best. That's as naive as the faith that most voters do.
    Illustrator has been slothfully resting on its "defacto standard" haunches since the dark ages (AKA the 80s). "Defacto standard" be hanged.
    I do have occasional issues with Illy with tools and UI....just not as easy or robust as it could/should be...cumbersome at times.
    Okay. What issues? State something specific and users actually familiar with other programs can compare.
    This is the 21st century. There's really little new under the sun here. A 2D drawing program is just an interface pasted on top of mostly the same old geometric functionality. The competitive advantage goes to the offering that best (easy) and most fully (robust) empowers the user. The multiplication of easy and robust yields elegance. That's a term I've never applied to Illustrator. Illustrator is one of the oldest of the bunch, lounging under the sun for so long it's at risk of skin cancer. Yet it still fails to provide basic functionality users of other drawing programs have taken for granted for decades.
    Examples that may be germane to your casual, non-commerical use? Try these things in Illustrator:
    Star Tool: Draw a star. Now change the number of points it has.
    Arc Tool: Draw 36 degrees of a circular arc.
    Label that star with a dimension.
    Distribute a group of different objects along a curve.
    Uniformly space Blend steps along a non-uniform curve.
    Attach a Blend to a closed path and have the first/last instances properly positioned.
    Knife Tool: Cut across an open unfilled path.
    Connect a text label to an object that stays connected when you move it.
    Paste a simple graphic into a text string so that it flows with the text.
    Perform a Find/Replace on carriage returns.
    Round Corners: Apply it to an accute or obtuse angle and have it actually yield the radius you specify.
    Crop a raster image.
    Rotate something. Go back later and find out what its rotation angle is.
    Pathfinders: Use them without wrecking existing fills/strokes.
    I could go on (and have). How long a list do you want? All the features/functions associated with the above basic operations (and many more) are substandard, half-baked, or even non-existent in Illustrator. This is "professional"-grade software? No, it's largely consumerish rubbish sold at exhorbitant prices just because it's the "defacto standard."
    Is it worth having a second program and learning...
    Obviously, it is to me (and a third, and a fourth, and...). As I've said many times in this forum, I don't know how anyone can legitimately claim to compare two programs if they've only got workaday familiarity with one.
    As with any other endeavor, the more drawing programs you're comfortable with, the less arduous it is to pick up another, because you tend to pick up on the underlying principles involved, as opposed to just becomming habituated to a particular program's command locations and procedures by rote.
    But you've been using AI for "many years" and find it to be "OK". So if you're happy with it, use it.
    I have a cheap, consumerish Ryobi table saw and it's "OK." But I didn't pay a professional-grade price for it, either. And I'm sure not going to write glorious reviews on it, call it "professional," and get all fearfully brand-loyal defensive about it if someone dares suggest I might ought to learn to use a different one. My use of it, like yours, is merely occasional. But I also presently need to build a TV cabinet, and I'm dreading it. If I were to open a cabinet shop, I'd be much more discriminating, and would do my own homework to make an informed decision.
    Or replacing Illy with something?
    One doesn't have to "replace." There's nothing any more wrong with using more than one 2D drawing program than there is with using more than one 3D modeling program, or raster imaging program, or page layout program, or word processor, or video edting program, or....
    Pro's/Con's that would make one make the effort to try/use something else?
    That depends on what one is doing with it. Not knowing that, I can again only offer generalities that matter to me: If you've only ever used one program of a particulat kind, you're rather in the dark regarding functionality that you may be missing that may be important to you. (Second-degree ignorance: You don't know what you don't know.) If you're mission-dependent upon that one program, you're also kind of captive to the whims and agenda of its vendor.
    That very well may not matter to you, given your nominal, occasional, unsophisticated, and non-commerical use. And if so, that's fine.
    I don't even know what out there is better than Illy. I've searched www and got a few hints but nothing very significant.
    But you just said you've been reading a bunch of posts here which mention other programs.
    Am I wasting my time looking?
    Only you can answer that about your time. Time is all any of us have.
    Your feedback welcomed to help me decide whether to explore/trial other programs.
    No offense, but frankly it sounds like you're just not motivated enough to do your own homework. If you are  sufficiently motivated, visit the websites of other drawing program vendors. Read the features lists. Dowload the demos, read the documentation, and try them out. Visit the programs' user forums. Or, if it's really not that important to you, don't.
    If you've got questions about specific functionality and/or specific programs, be more specific about what you do (or want to do).
    JET

  • Is Intel better than Power PC?

    Hi
    Is Intel better than Power PC?
    The reason I ask this is that Iv been transferring data from my old 350 G4 to my new Mac Book Via Fire wire (G4 in target mode) and Iv had some crashes with the Finder. This pretty much never happened with my old Mac. Force quitting does not save me like it use to if an app crashed. It just goes into a spin and stays there, thinking. Reminds me of Windows XP.
    Any Ideas. Thoughts. Etc.
    MacBook   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   1G Ram

    Daimon,
    I would say it's a subjective answer based on use. Be glad that you have a machine that supports target mode. My B&W is a nightmare for transfers. The only irritating crashes I've had are the same as with any of my machines (Safari), which is probably due to a plugin.
    I have had the experience of force quitting not quitting an application. A kill -9 doing the same thing. It looks like force quitting does quit the problem applications (processor usage drops back down), but they stay active in the dock. A restart functioned normally for me and that went away. The only applications this happens with were popcorn 2 and toast 7.1. Both of those are PPC apps that just made the intel transition and basically device drivers..so I would almost expect them to have been problematic. Everything else has been basically fine.
    As to what's better. Security wise, there might be some concern about the Out-of-order execution distribution system of the PPC vs x86. PPC could be considered slightly more secure as it is difficult to gain data from the stack w/o being able to accurately predict the position. However, this is trivial first and is probably remedied a lot by the dual core setup....and it requires a level of access that Mac OS X doesn't just give up to anyone. When you get to performance...to me it's night and day.
    I like to put a lot of my video content on my machine in a highly compressed state. It makes it convenient to watch movies or a series and you don't need to have a loud optical drive spinning around. If I was to use something like Handbrake or Instant Handbrake: http://handbrake.m0k.org/ to encode to h.264 on a G5 it would take long enough that I would have to go do something else. On the dual core chips it's almost unbelievable. It's not that the 950 chipset does hardware h.264 encoding (I know some ATI 1xxx cards have this capability, but the only intel data http://www.intel.com/products/chipsets/gma950/ I've seen indicate MPEG-2 playback is the highest video optimization ), it's that SSE(1,2,3) on a dual core processor with an application designed for multiple cores/processors (not the same physically, but application wise it's close enough), flies. We're talking something going from 7 fps to 48 fps (better than real time).
    There is definitely a Wow factor to these machines. Maybe you just need to try something like that to find it.
    I think the instability is due to transitional software. Another thing you may want to consider is that many included applications and parts of Mac OS X aren't pushing the chips anywhere near the limit. Many things just use 100 of 200% . Wait a while and more things will be introduced or updated that make your new machine fly.
    I haven't had a finder crash that I recall. Nor a beach ball I couldn't get out of. If it is just limited to the dock (as it appears to be for me), then it's a minor issue. There have been comments about the Rosetta process translated quitting (IIRC), and I will add that twice I have experienced a situation where PPC apps bounced w/o launching. A restart fixed that.
    Windows isn't that bad. Even on a core duo (not a centrino duo Tiger is still easier to stabilize/ 'more stable'.
    I think a lot of the issues you are having are just growing pains and transfer of apps or files that, while they may have been updated to 'universal binary', aren't designed for the chips in these machines from the ground up.
    Give it some time and try some of the things that make these machines better, because subjectively...I think these machines are better.
    Another idea...running PPC apps takes a LOT of memory for speed (otherwise you're paging like a maniac) so either up your machines memory or run one PPC app at a time.
    Good Luck,
    -j

  • Better than iMovie

    I'm busy editing my 3 month holiday in South Africa with iMovie (first time - new to Mac's), but the program seems a bit limited. Is there another piece of video editing software for a Mac that's alot better than iMovie?
    (I know you get the really expensive ones like Adobe, but I'm looking for something that will equal Nero 7 for Windows, maybe something a bit better or expensive)
    Thanx

    define 'better' ...?
    iM is excellent to import from miniDV, trim&crop material, add some simple transitions & titles... that is 95% of consumer level (.. and editor's) work..
    'better' in means of 'more options':
    Final Cut Express
    $$ (=cheaper than FCP) but a steep learning curve too ...

  • Why SecureCRT is better than Putty?

    who can tell me any feature that worth to use SecureCRT than Putty?
    thank you in advance.

    867166 wrote:
    Maybe SecureCRT support zmoden command to send/recv files.You think that is a plus? In today's networking environment?
    Last I used zmodem was via a 14400 Sportster running SLIP - more than a decade ago...
    Or am I missing something that zmodem does better than scp/sftp? {noformat} ;-) {noformat}

  • Are Aperture's editing tools similar to or better than PS Elements?

    Are the editing tools in Aperture similar to or better than PS Elements?
    I'm an amateur photographer - I need images for my web site - plants and gardens, mostly, I have a perennial plant nursery.
    I've been using PS Elements 2.0 to manipulate images, mostly rotation, sharpen resizing, adjusting contrast....
    Aperture sounds very interesting - the tools for viewing and comparing images sound more graceful and easy to use.
    Thanks - paul
    MacBook Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

    Out of interest, I went over to the Adobe Lightroom forums and found the following:
    "Lightroom is aimed at being a workflow for handling raw camera images doing mostly global corrections. Photoshop Elements is meant for handling processed images mostly and allows you to do fine local adjustments
    Global means adjustments which are applied to the entire image such as tonal correction etc whereas localized corrections are something like removing a hair out of place, doing composite images, or removing red-eye."
    Lightroom is Adobe's soon-to-be competing product, so it's basically equivalent to Aperture (until you look at the details - but that's another topic). The comments quoted above are relevant to Aperture as well.
    - Pierre

Maybe you are looking for