Something interesting with check rule for VAT registration no.

Hi Guys,
I found something weird in sap with check rule for VAT registration no.
If I set any of check rules for US and save(tcode oy17), then change the country of a customer from DE to US and save(not change the VAT registration no), the system post error messages "ISO code DE is not correct in the VAT registration number". But if I set rule for AU(australia) with same rule as US, and change the customer's country from DE to AU(not change the VAT no), no error happens and customer can be saved successfully. So anybody can give any explanation on this problem?
Thanks in advance, point will be rewared. Waiting for the comments.
Regards,
Alex

<TABLE align=center border=0 cellPadding=1 cellSpacing=1 width="95%"><tr><td width="15px"><input type="image" src="wwv_flow_file_mgr.get_file?p_security_group_id=1046425373323359&p_fname=add2d1.jpg" name="add_QTB_5174" id="add_QTB_5174" onclick="javascript:addRowToTable('QTB_5174',4,22.5);return false;"/></td><td width="15px"><input type="image" src="wwv_flow_file_mgr.get_file?p_security_group_id=1046425373323359&p_fname=delete2d.gif" alt="delete" name="delete_QTB_5174" id="delete_QTB_5174" onclick="javascript:removeRowFromTable('QTB_5174');return false;"/></td><td><input type="image" src="wwv_flow_file_mgr.get_file?p_security_group_id=1046425373323359&p_fname=edit2d.jpg" alt="edit" name="edit_QTB_5174" id="edit_QTB_5174" onclick="javascript:updateTableRow('QTB_5174',22.5);return false;"/></td></tr></table>
<input type="hidden" value="QTB_5174" id="5174"><TABLE align=center border=0 cellPadding=1 cellSpacing=1 width="95%" id="QTB_5174" name="QTB_5174">
this a sample code. I have marked the name attrib in bold.

Similar Messages

Which Checking rule for BackOrder

Hi
I am not sure which Checking rule to use for Back Order Processing CO06. SAP has given it as BO, however I can also do it with Checking rule A.
Is this neceaasry to do it by BO , or it can be done A.
Regards,
Neeraj Srivastava

Dear Neeraj
For Backorder processing, the checking rule should be BO only. Checking Rule A applies only for sale order creation.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Checking Rule for Process Order

Hi Guys
I am using the standard checking rule for Process Order while releasing. This rule considers the quality blocked stock also as available stock and thus release the Process Order.
However the client does not want to include the quality block stock for process order. My question is:
1. If I create a checking rule which does not consider quality stock as available, and attach it to release of Process Order, will it make any change in MRP run?
2. Is there a means to show a warning message while release of process order to show the stock is in quality block state?
3. Is there any other means to alarm or warn the user before release of Process order about the material quality block state?
Appreciate you help / suggestion on this
Thanks in advance
Rahul

Hi,
Regards the stocks during MRP run, you can do it in tow areas
1. In OPPI, you can define whether Stockin transfer/blocked/restricted stocks can be taken into account for MRP run.
2. You can exclude storage locations in MRP run and assign the MRP storage location indicator as 1 in MRP 4 view.
Apart from this the MRP will consider all stocks and requirements.
If you don't want to consider QI stock (for ex) then you can convert them as blocked stocks or you can move to a storage location which is not assigned to the MRP.
Thanks,
JK

Report GL Account Line Item with vendor name and VAT registration number

Hi,
Is there any standard SAP report/inquiry for GL Account Line Item like FBL3N, with information vendor name and VAT Registration Number (field STCEG) without using ABAP.
Thanks.

Hi,
We can get purchase register through T.Code: 'J1I2' by specifying condition types and tax codes.
We can't get 100% report from this T.Code.
Check it once.
Regards,
Padmaja N.

Checking Rule for PO STO

Hi there,
I need to know how to setting this, PO STO can not allocated Finished Goods item, because it's already reserved by SO.
Right now, PO STO can not do this then the result is SO can not keep the item anymore.
Many Thanks'
Nardo
Edited by: Nardo9574 on Feb 26, 2011 5:02 AM

Dear Murugesan
In Material Master MRP3 view, you would be maintaining some value for "Availability Check". For this availability check, in OVZ9, the checking rule is defined.
Based on the combination of this, when you create a sale order for that material, the checking rule will be carried out.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Checking rule for sales document types

Hi,
Can I change the cheking rule for a sales document type? Where could I change it? or should I build Z table?
Thanks!

7,
Checking rule is hard-coded into standard SAP sales doc maintenance programs. For SOs, it is A or A* (depending on the stock type). For Deliveries, it is B or B*. There is no way to use standard configuration to alter the rule within SD.
Best Regards,
DB49

Availability checking rule for sales orders

Hi experts,
To meet our useru2019s requirement I have switched off the availability check at the schedule line category level. But when I created a sales order the AVC is still happening. Upon checking I have noticed the availability checking group as u201C02u201D and checking rule as u201CBu201D in sales order. To my understanding the checking rule should be u201CAu201D for all sales orders. Could you please advise as to why it is happening so?

Hi,
I have done as what suggested and I created a new sales order. Upon checking (Sales screen --} environment --} availability) the availability checking group is 02 and checking rule is B. Please note that for the other sales document types we have, the checking group is 02 and checking rule is A

Leave Quota generation with diifferent rules for different countries

Hi,
I have the following requirement need help in achieving this.
Employers must grant 10 days paid leave to employees that worked for six consecutive months from the time of hiring and who worked on not less than 80 per cent of all schedule work days. This paid leave may be taken consecutively or separately. Where an employee's application to take paid leave will hinder the normal business operations, the employer may require the employee to take such paid leave at a different time.
The number of days of paid leave available to employees increases in proportion to employees' length of service as set forth in the below table.
Years of Service 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5+
Paid Holidays 10 11 12 14 16 18 20
The right to annual paid leave expires after two years. In other words, annual paid leave left over from one year may be carried over and taken the next year only. For example, if an employee is awarded 10 days paid leave after their first 6 months of employment; those paid holidays will become invalid after 2.5 years of employment. Use them or lose them.
Simply put, holidays from one year can be carried over to the next year, but not to the third year. So, if you don't take your leave from one particular year within 12 months of that year ending, you will lose that first year's allowance.
Employee can take leave encashment of holiday leave only when leaving their employer. It is not legal for companies to buy up the holiday leave of those still working for the firm.
In my organization one PSG grouping has been used for all countries, it wont be possible to change the grouping now. In such a case how can we provide different rule for different country without customizing the Leave module.
Do we have to use any PCR for this, if yes which??
Regards,
Jailakshmi
Edited by: Jailakshmi on Aug 3, 2011 7:16 AM

Hi,
Use QUOMO Feature to give different entitilement to employees.
Leave entitlement as per seniority can be configured in base entitlement.
Keep validity and deduction period for 2 years by using :Relative postion" option in validity and deduction period table.
Rgds,
Lata
Rgds,

Rules for VAT register numeration

Hi all
As somes of you know in Italy it is not permit to have a numeration gap in FI VAT declaration register; the vendor and customer invoices has to have a consecutive numbers without "lost" numbers in the sequence and following the calendar date sequence (ex. invoice nr.1 is of 23 june the invoice Nr.2 cannot be of 22 june).
In Spain exist the same rule with in plus the obligation to have different number sequence for invoice and credit note, local, cee and extracee documents (or at least this is that our FI manager in Spain tell us).
We are import in our system a group of companies of various nations:
Sweden, Portugal, France, Germany, UK, Belgium, Emirates Arabes, Switzerland,Italy, Spain.
Now our problem is to know in what of these nations (a part Italy and Spain naturally) exist VAT rules like these report above or likely? Our references in these companies are controllers and sales managers (now they using a no-SAP system) so they don't understand the importance of problem (for our internal logic our SD and MM invoices pass they document number to corresponding document number in FI, so in VAT declaration appears the number generated in logistic environment).
Thanks for help.
Davide

Dear,
You should do the below things to achieve the Z Report.
1. Find out the table and filed name which Client is asking for.
2. Find the relation with the report fields S_ALR_87012385
3. Speak to your ABAPer and ask him to add the filed to above report by copying the existing.
Thanks

Problem with Settelment Rule for iw32

Hi,
Good day guys
Iam getting the problem while creating the settelment rule creation. Ive got a problem with " wa_srules-SOURCE     = '1' ".
If i wont fill this field, settelment rule is going to be created. but i need to fill this field as per requirement.
Ive got a error message "Enter an Existing source assingment for souce stracutre CS.
Plz any one guide me, how to overcome this prob
DATA: srules TYPE srules_ext OCCURS 0,
      wa_srules TYPE srules_ext,
      lv_mandt type SYMANDT.
DATA IT_OBJNR TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF IONRB WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: ls_copadata type BAPI_COPA_DATA occurs 0.
DATA: ls_cobrb type standard table of cobrb with header line.
IT_OBJNR-OBJNR = CAUFVD_IMP-OBJNR.
APPEND IT_OBJNR.
break-point.
CALL FUNCTION 'K_SRULE_PRE_READ'
EXPORTING
   I_PFLEGE               = ' '
TABLES
   T_SENDER_OBJNR          = IT_OBJNR
*   T_COBRA                =
EXCEPTIONS
   WRONG_PARAMETERS       = 1
   OTHERS                 = 2
CALL FUNCTION 'K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_EXISTENCE'
EXPORTING
    objnr                = caufvd_imp-objnr
*   FLG_LOCAL            = ' '
* IMPORTING
*   E_COBRA              =
EXCEPTIONS
   RULE_NOT_FOUND       = 1
   OTHERS               = 2
CALL FUNCTION 'K_SRULE_CREATE'
EXPORTING
   i_objnr                   = caufvd_imp-objnr
*     I_CHECK_ONLY_LOCAL        = ' '
*   IMPORTING
*     E_COBRA                   =
EXCEPTIONS
rule_already_exists       = 1
OTHERS                    = 2.
wa_srules-SOURCE     = '1'.
wa_srules-settl_type = 'FUL'.
wa_srules-percentage = '100'.
*wa_srules-amount     = ''.
wa_srules-COMP_CODE = caufvd_imp-bukrs.
*wa_srules-PROFIT_CTR = caufvd_imp-PRCTR.
*wa_srules-costcenter = caufvd_imp-kostl.
wa_srules-costcenter = '10-60'.
APPEND wa_srules TO srules.
wa_srules-SOURCE     = '1'.
wa_srules-settl_type = 'PER'.
wa_srules-percentage = '100'.
*wa_srules-amount     = ''.
wa_srules-COMP_CODE = caufvd_imp-bukrs.
*wa_srules-PROFIT_CTR = caufvd_imp-PRCTR.
*wa_srules-costcenter = caufvd_imp-kostl.
wa_srules-costcenter = '10-60'.
APPEND wa_srules TO srules.
CALL FUNCTION 'K_ORDER_SRULE_ADD'
EXPORTING
    object_no                  = caufvd_imp-objnr
* IMPORTING
*   FLG_RULE_INSERTED          =
tables
    srules                     = srules
IF sy-subrc = 0.
commit work.
Endif
Regards
Edited by: balaji kiran on Mar 26, 2010 10:18 AM

Hello Vitaliy,
Nice to "see" you here
I did try remodelling and it works fine here. A constant value rule really gets a constant value.
The user exit option also works fine here. Here's an example of a very simple user exit for a KF:
method IF_RSCNV_EXIT~EXIT.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <l_s_old> TYPE ANY,
                 <l_fillfield> TYPE ANY,
                 <l_newfield> TYPE ANY,
                 <fs_kfsource> type any.
* Assign the references to field symbols
ASSIGN c_r_newfield->* TO <l_newfield>.
ASSIGN i_r_old->* TO <l_s_old>.
* We will use the value of the 0AMOUNT KF. The value of the new KF is 0AMOUNT + 5.
ASSIGN COMPONENT 'AMOUNT' OF STRUCTURE <l_s_old> TO <fs_kfsource>.
<l_newfield> = <fs_kfsource> + 5.
endmethod.
For a KF, you can check the fields of the FACT Table (/BIx/Fzzzz) to know the field names for your source KFs.
Hope this helps.

ATP checking rule for PM order

Hi friends,
How do I check which ATP rule is being used for Plant maintainence order (PM) order. Using Tcode IW41 we create PM order and do the goods movement type 261.
Error: I have an item ABC with quantity 1 and there exists a deliver for this 1 unit. Still, I am able to issue this part to PM order which should not happen.
Please advise .
Sruthi

SPRO->PM and CS->Maintenance and service processing->Maintenance and service orders->Functions and settings for order type->Availabilty check for material, PRTs and capacity

POP up LOV with check boxes for APEX 4.0

I'm using APEX 4.0 on Oracle 11g and I will like to be able to select multiple selections when the POP UP dislplays. Is there a way to add check boxes?
Thanks In Advance
Jenice

Hallo to all,
again i can't find any turnaround for having a pop up, working with the technique I mentioned.
Did anybody know a turnaround / can point to a good link?
I'm very frustrated because with select list based on query works without problem... (but using this object is not the case such the user have to insert new value as well directly from the tabulare form).
Thanx
Message was edited by:
Marcello Nocito
Message was edited by:
Marcello Nocito

Tree UI with Check box for parent/child selection.

Hello experts,
I need to create a tree UI to display a hierarchy of nodes, but as a business requirment it is needed to have a checkbox in each node/element of the tree, so if I select a parent node (I mean checking it), all it's child nodes must also be checked and their corresponding elements.
Also if I select a child element, all the parent nodes must be checked all the way up to the root node.
If the user selects a child node, all subsecuent nodes/elements must be checked, and the parents of the child node selected also.
Basically like the functionality when installing software on a PC where the user selects components to install (like office), this is just the concept behind what we mean to accomplish.
The nodes are NOT recursive.
How can I accomplish that?
Thanks in advance.
JV

I haven't worked with this myself but adding functionality to APEX features is generally going to require doing some extra coding via jQuery, JavaScript or AJAX. Try contacting Hilary Farrell of Oracle, her handle is, hfarrell. She is talented in the charts, maps and trees arena.

Check the settings for checking group 02 and checking rule BO

Hi,
I am doing Backorder processing for order , I am getting the error as follows,
I have checked Checking Rule For Updating Backorders. Everything ok.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Pramod

One Probable reason for you error.
Check the TC: OVZ2 whether you have ticked the Block qty req. for the Checking group 02 or you have selected No checks.
The standard setting for 02 should not have any tick..
or _Check in the TC : se38 program : SAPLOPP3.
Check whether you have defined the plants with the checking rule BO.
This must be your error._
reward points if helpful,
regards,
Amlan Sarkar

ATP - One Checking group for several checking rules (Trans. OPJJ)

Hello,
In my system, each control group is associated to several checking rules. So, I don't understand how the system choose the right rule to use.
IIs it normal use ? SAP Documentation and forum threads seems to speak always about one checking rule for one checking group.
Thanks for your help,
Emmanuel
Edited by: Kholargol on Oct 2, 2009 11:19 AM

Emmanuel,
Just to add to what Prasobh explained on how to use different check rule 01/02 at production order level there are other checking rules that apply to SD module which is more important for defining ATP stratgey for various finished products.
So a simple sales oder for made to stock product may have checking rule A that considers existing unrestricted stock, purchase orders, production orders dates to promise against.
However a MTO sale order for made to order(MTO) product may have a check rule AE that should consider only the relevant production order and /or replenshipment lead time to promise against.
So while checking group set at material master needs many check rules specific to various Sale orders, production orders, plant mainteneance orders, or project orders.
Hope this helps in your understanding of this concept.
Thanks,
Ram

Something interesting with check rule for VAT registration no.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for