Sony RAW - 16:9 aspect ratio: how to change to 3:2?

Hi,
I normally shoot in RAW on my Sony A700 with 3:2 aspect ratio and I've found a utility that will enable me to extract the HD jpeg that Sony embeds in every A700 RAW picture.  These jpegs can be automatically extracted, put on an SD card and played back through my Panasonic HD TV - a quick and very attractive slideshow.  So far, so good.  However, using the 3:2 aspect ratio means that the embedded jpeg is 1620 x 1080 pixels not 1920 x 1080, so it doesn't fill the screen.  If I change to shooting in 16:9, the extracted embedded jpegs are now 1920 x 1080 and do fill the screen.
The interesting thing is that the 16:9 format RAW file has still been captured in the 3:2 format and is the same size in MB, but there is, presumably, now a flag in the EXIF data which is used by Lightroom and Photoshop CS3 so that they display the RAW file as 16:9.  Now DxO Optics Pro ignores this flag and displays the same RAW file in 3:2 format.  I still want to process the RAW file in its 3:2 format (ie I don't necessarily want to lose the top and bottom of the picture).
The question, therefore, is whether there is any way that I can cause Lightroom (or Photoshop and Bridge) to ignore the flag indicating that a RAW file should be processed in 16:9 format?
Any help on this would be most welcome.
Ian

I am very surprised LR reads the tag. There is a fix. Convert your RAW file to DNG and then run DNG recover edges on it:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/contents/DNG-Recover-Edges.shtml
When reimported into Lightroom, you should see all pixels in the RAW file.

Similar Messages

  • OM-D: how to view entire 4:3 RAW file when aspect ratio set in-camera to 3:2?

    When shooting RAW, the OM-D records 4:3 files no matter what the aspect ratio is set to.  If you set it to 3:2 (for example), the camera records some sort of metadata to communicate this information to Lightroom, which honors the setting.  So far, so good.
    My question is, is there any way to override that setting? I have a photo shot at 3:2, but I can see from the in-camera preview that it'd be a better shot with the whole thing. But I can't figure out how to get LR 4.1rc2 to show me the whole thing!
    Thanks,
    Ben

    Unfortunately, there is no way in LR directly. You may be able to restore the settings directly in the raw file using exiftool (tags "aspectratio" and "aspectframe", there are instructions in some forums I think), but it is generally not advisable to manipulate original raws that way (at least, a backup should be made).
    See also:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lightroom_4_1_rc_trouble_with_canon_ 5d_mark_iii_aspect_ratio
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/importing_orf_files_does_not_import_ all_image_area

  • Aspect Ratio: How do I configure aspect ratio for a wider-pixel projector?

    Hi.. I have an HD72 connected to my MacMini (Core Duo); the resulting picture cast on the screen has pixels a bit wider than exected, so all the cute girlies look fat Seriously, if I display a square, it's a bit more of a rectangle, and I'm wondering where I can configure the Mac Mini to alter its resolution or its aspect ratio to comply. A Quicktime-only solution is fine, this doesn't bother me except when watching videos.

    Regardless of the display resolution, if your projector is displaying pixels in a slightly oblong fashion then its outside of the Mac's ability to compensate. The most the mac can do aspect ratio-wise, is to set a different number of pixels on the x and y axes, which would create a different screen aspect ratio, but wouldnt touch the pixel aspect ration. Perhaps the oblong pixels are the projector's way of stretching a too-narrow screen resolution to fit the area the projector is trying to cover. You should be able to change the output screen resolution to the projector in the displays system preference. Try several and see which one works best with the projector.

  • Canon s95 in 3.3 RAW aspect ratio

    Hi,
    When I import Canon s95 in 3.3, RAW + JPEG with aspect ratio 3:2, I see the picture in 3:2 ratio.
    Nevertheless, the RAW has the full info (4:3)
    Is it possible to have it?
    Thanks

    Unfortunately, Lightroom does not read settings made by other software.  This probably would not be a solution for you.  But I wanted to create a series of images that would display full screen on my HD TV, 16:9 aspect ratio.  I selected all the images and then made the crop on the first one with auto sync enabled.  Then I went through the images, approximately 250, and found that I only had to make positional adjustments on about 20 of them.  In my opinion, I saved a lot of time.

  • AE changing aspect ratio of rendered frames

    I'm rendering .png frames at NTSC DV, 720x480, Pixel aspect 0.9.  My composition settings in AE are set to the same, however, when I import the frames they are listed as 720x480 (1.11).  When viewed in the composition window the frames extend past the viewable area on both sides.  Using AE 7.0.
    Why is this happening, and how do I fix it?
    Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

    This is going to sound weird but it's the truth. The aspect ratio doesn't change the pixels. Aspect ratio only sets the interpretation - or tells a video app how to  make those pixels fit in a desired space on a scan line. It's a lot like the PPI tag added to images intended for print. The tag has nothing to do with the actual pixels.
    That said, if you can't find a setting for choosing pixel aspect ratio when you setup the output module and the render settings, then the PAR tag won't be added to the render. AE, or your NLE will then take a look at the frame size and make a guess as to PAR and field order. The guess may be wrong. If it is, all you have to do is go into the interpretation settings and change them.
    I'd guess you're rendering to a DV codec. If so, there's no PAR tag so all you have to do is reset the interpretation. The same goes for Premiere or FCP or Vegas or any other NLE. Sometimes DV footage gets interpreted as the wrong PAR.
    Hope this helps.

  • Letterbox stretching aspect ratio dvx100a help!!!

    I shot video on my dvx100a camera in letterbox mode. My manual says letterbox means 16:9.
    In FCP I captured using easy set-up NTSC and 48KHZ 720x480.
    Maybe that is wrong?
    Anyway I noticed the image looks stretched in the viewer. If I uncheck anamorphic in all my clips the image looks normal. But when I export video edited this way to FCSP or just to quicktime I have black bars not only on the top and bottom but also on the sides. It's not terrible but the image is a box within a black box or - how do you say? floating on black.
    Is there something I'm doing wrong? I tried capturing with 48 KHZ anamorphic and got the same thing.
    Anything I can do? And if there is something I can do, does that mean I need to recapture all my video using a different capture setting?

    I own the DVX100B, essentially same camera. In Letterbox mode, those black bands are already burned into the 4:3 frame. The manual states "Black bands are recorded at the top and bottom of the image."
    Therefore, I would guess you should capture as ordinary NTSC 48K. Then you can scale the image up into a 16:9 sequence if you want but it will degrade the picture accordingly. But at least your aspect ratio won't change.
    The Panasonic DVX100A/B is a great camera but you should not film using Letterbox mode. You could try the Squeeze mode, but the best method for getting 16:9 from the DVX100 is buying an $800 Anamorphic lens adapter. I outfitted both my cameras with one. This allows you to use FCP's NTSC 48k Anamorphic capture preset to get the best 16:9 from that camera. But if you must have wide screen, try the Squeeze Mode. Good luck.
    Hope that helps.
    Eddie

  • Converting to a 16:9 aspect ratio

    I have used Premiere Elements – V4 to develop slide shows of family photographs. The slide show was burned onto a DVD. A standard DVD player is used to view the DVD contents on a TV screen.
    The slide shows are displayed on the screen in a 4:3 aspect ratio. Since most of the recipients of the DVD now have HDTV, I would like to provide them with a DVD that would display the photos in the new 16:9 format without any distortion (e.g., squeeze or elongation) in the photos.
    Can I use Premiere Elements – v4 to burn a DVD with the 16:9 aspect ratio? 
    If yes, please tell me how to do that.

    Steve,
    I did not want to start a new project.
    I had hoped to take the existing project that was created with a 4:3 aspect ratio and covert it to a 16:9 aspect ratio (perhaps by changing a setting somewhere) before burning it to a DVD.
    Can I do that? If so, how?

  • Widescreen aspect ratio help

    I'm reading this site:
    http://www.shapeofdays.com/2005/05/a_demonstration.html
    and i read that: "A widescreen standard-definition TV picture is 850 pixels across by 480 pixels down."
    questions:
    1) so what is the aspect ratio if i change the "standard-defintion" to read HD or Hi-Definition?
    2) preface: i created a Widescreen project using iMovie HD 5.0.2 that was shot at 16:9. i created a DVD from the iMovie project and it is 16:9. i "shared" my finished project and selected Full at the first prompts and got a dialogue saying something about the full quality of my project being saved; it produced a QT .dv file of the size of my project (about 3 gb) which is correct, afaik.
    question: why is my exported [at] Full dv quality QT .dv file only 720 x 480? instead of 850 x 480?
    ==
    while i'm asking questions: i'm about to export that .dv file to H.264, however i wish to reduce the view size by half --for a lower size-- how do i correctly assign a new properly reduced 50% size so that my aspect ratio is preserved only smaller by half?
    thanks.

    A widescreen standard-definition TV picture is 850 pixels across by 480 pixels down
    A standard NTSC picture is 640 x 480
    BUT, DV format saves video in a 720x480 ratio. DV pixels are not square, however. When shooting standard TV, the pixels are higher than they are wide and appear 640x480. When shooting widescreen, the pixels are wider than they are tall, thus giving a 16x9 (850x480) appearance.
    As to your specific question about H.264, try exporting to a custom size of 425 by 240.

  • Slide Size = ? Aspect Ratio

    Does anyone have any idea as to what aspect ratio a 1024 X 768 slide in Keynote is? I have a projector that the aspect ratio can be changed. My issue is that I don't know what size screen I need for the projector? They are available in 16:9, 1:1, and 4:1 aspect ratios. My presentation has been created in a 1024 X 768 slide size. I realize I can change that but would rather not as the 1024 X 768 slide size seems to be the best to have the type clean and visible.
    Thanks in advance if you know.

    You also need to know the lens zoom factor and the position of your projector. This will determine the size of the screen. The aspect ratio of the screen should be the same as the aspect ratio of the projector: Projecto 16:9 - Screen 16:9.
    In terms of font size that is easy to read, that largely depends on the distance between the viewer and the screen. Rule of thumb is that the closest person shuold be 0.7 x the height of the screen (9' high screen = 6.3' to the front row of seating) and the furthest should be no more than 7 x the height of the screen (9' high screen = 63' to the last row of seating). This also depends on the content shown. So for slides with fine details (lot of small text, busy slides) maximum distance should be no more then 4 x height of the screen. 6 x for spreadhseet and up to 8 times for video and images.
    Hope this helps.

  • Cropping aspect ratio changes randomly

    Each time I crop a new image, the aspect ratio seems to change randomly. Sometimes it will pop up as "Do Not Constrain." Sometimes it will appear as 4x5. Or 2x3. Etc. You get the idea. I have no idea why it's changing. It's very disruptive to the workflow. Any thoughts on what might be causing this?
    I encounter the issue on both my MacBook Pro and my iMac.

    Thanks, Stan.
    I just posted a draft video on Youtube for a client last night.  Not sure if viewing a clip of what I see will help you but I suspect it will.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_hzhCeCGR0
    If you go to about 4:34 in the clip you'll see it change over to a different aspect ratio.
    This sequence was exported directly from PPro CS4 to FLV.  The FLV file was uploaded to Youtube.
    I'm editing this morning and just came across this same issue again.
    I'm amazed that none of my clients have mentioned it yet.  Of course, I'm not making Hollywood movies - these are just short videos people send out to college coaches.
    Thanks,
    Dan

  • Aspect Ratio - Anamorphicizer

    i have troubles with burning my fcp (version 6.0.6) project.
    my workflow is this: i make my movie in fcp, export it as a quicktime reference movie, drag it onto anamorphicizer, import it into idvd and save as image file. worked perfectly well a hundred times.
    since i updated on snow leopard it is not possible to use anamorphicizer, i get error messages. it is also not possible to play the reference movie in quicktime with the correct aspect ratio - in qt 7 there was the possibility in the "window-menu - command-j - adjust blend - clear" to correct this (sorry for explaining quite complicate, my english, you know ...).
    anyone an idea what i could do to correct the aspect ratio so that idvd can handle the project correct? switching to dvd studio may be fine, but it will take me a few weeks to learn and i need the project on dvd soon ...
    thanks in advance
    wolfgang

    I'd say just use Quicktime to change your display ratio instead of Anamorphicizer. I use NTSC DV Anamorphic, so if you're using another format you'll have to calculate your own numbers. Open your exported video in QT.
    In Quicktime 7.x pick Window -> Show Movie Properties from the menu bar. go to the video track. Go to the Visual Settings tab. Uncheck the "Preserve Aspect Ratio" box. Change the first box in the Scaled Size field to the correct width for your anamorphic video. If you're using NTSC DV this is 853. Press enter and your video size should change. Recheck the box, press save, and you're done. iDVD will see this.
    If you're not using NTSC DV you are using a 16x9 ratio, so divide your Y number by 9, then multiply that by 16 to get your X number. Sample calculation with a 720x480 is something like this.
    480/9=53.3333
    53.3333x16=853.3333 so use 853 for your stretched X value.
    Hope this solves your problem. It's a really easy fix after you do it a few times, and it beats having to use another program.

  • Motion project aspect ratios.

    The Problem:
    When opening a motion project in FCP, the aspect ratio is completely changed and never looks right even when both settings are exactly the same.
    The Details:
    Motion Ratio= Project: NTSC Broadcast SD 720 X 486 29.97fps NTSC D1/DV Anamorphic
    Final Cut= NTSC DV (3:2) 720 X 480 anamorphic 29.97fps
    PLEASE HELP!

    Well one problem I see is that you are using different setting for Motion (720x486 anamorphic) and FCP (DV 720x480 anamorphic). That will cause you other, ugly problems so you should make them identical.
    When you say it didn't work, did you change the browser clip or the timeline clip? And you added the checkmark? That should do it.

  • Compressor 3.5 changes Aspect Ratio

    I've been using FCp for years now making HD 1080i originals and using compressor to make H.264 deinterlaced QuickTime clips to upload. After the upgrade, none of my pre-established settings work as expected. The main problem is that the 16x9 aspect ratio has now changed. All of my compressed films are coming out very wide and stretched. I have played with several settings but can't seem to modify an old setting file or make a new one that provides consistent results. When I do stumble upon something that yields 16:9 like my original source the quality is nowhere near what I was getting prior to the upgrade. Is there a simple answer to this, like a new switch I am missing or is this a bug? I have been reading that compressing HD down to a SD DVD isn't as pretty as before either so I'm wondering if there's an underlying issue with the 3.5 upgrade or the latest OS upgrade. It seems like when I first upgraded compressor was fine, but I'm not sure I didn't compress many files. Now I'm up to OS 10.5.8 and for sure my aspect ratio is diferent than before. Any ideas??

    Though it's nice to be able to export directly to Compressor, I've gone back to my old method, which works fine: I export as a "Quicktime Movie", making sure I am set to "Current Settings", "Make Movie Self-Contained" and do not "Recompress All Frames".
    I then send this file to Compressor and run my "VimeoHD" preset and everything comes out fine.
    The extra step is worth the reliability and troubleshooting factor. You also don't have to have both FCP & Compressor open at the same time talking to each other, which means you have more resources devoted to your compression.
    I still wonder if this problem happens in FCS3?

  • CS6 Camera Raw - I can now only crop using aspect ratio in the custom crop setting rather than being able to set the dims in cm and inches? anyone know how to revert? ever since installing new mac operating system things have been strange!

    CS6 Camera Raw - I can now only crop using aspect ratio in the custom crop setting rather than being able to set the dims in cm and inches? anyone know how to revert? ever since installing new mac operating system things have been strange!

    Hi Kglad.
    I have looked at all of my settings both in Bridge and CS6 Photoshop regarding Camera Raw. I am at a loss how to set the crop tool in cm or inches as I once did - now the only option is to crop using ratios of 1:1 etc etc - This is infuriating as lots of my square crops I could set at 10" x 10'' specifically to print one to one to fit frame and mount size -
    Now if cropping using bloody aspect ratio of 1:1 (square) the actual dims of the crop are roughly 4.25 inches x 4.25 inches. this means I then have to open the whole image in photoshop in order to crop at the dims I have set! It was so much quicker in terms of batch cropping in camera raw being able to set dims in centimetres and inches but they have gone and mucked around with it, with the new bloody update! Unless you are an absolute genius and know how I can go back to having an option of CM, Inches and aspect ratio within the custom crop settings? (Please say you do)
    here is the new tutorial for CC -  my guess is they have scrapped the control we had over the custom crop settings
    Cropping Images In Adobe Camera Raw 8

  • How to keep original aspect ratio when cropping in Camera Raw?

    How to keep original aspect ratio when cropping in Camera Raw? Cant figure it out! With shift, the aspect ratio is 1:1. But I didnt set it to 1:1 (I checked "normal").

    The Shift key works once you’ve set your crop ratio.  DSLRs would typically do 2:3 and others sometimes do 3:4.

Maybe you are looking for

  • If I don't want to use my Seagate hard drive anymore for Time Machine...How do I go about this?

    I want to use the external hard drive still, but not as my back up disk for Time Machine anymore. How do I make it so that my Macbook doesn't associate this specific external hard drive with TM when I plug it in? Thanks

  • Mail and address book data file location

    Does anyone know where mail and address book saves its data? My old mac died but I was able to remove the hard drive and mount it in a external firewire case. The drive mounts and appears in good shape. I tried using the migration utility to transfer

  • Calling the CSV Export link in a Report Template

    I'm trying to have our "download" link appear on the bottom left rather then the default which is to the far right in Look 4. When I look at the source code, I can see how look 3 and 4 differ - different HTML table set-up and "align=right" for the li

  • Error single row subquery

    Hi all, I m getting error ORA-01427 single row subquery return more than one row when i execute the below query. could some one help me in writing the below query update dvd_genre set GENRE_I = (select GENRE_I from dvd_gen_data                       

  • Calendar from various albums?

    I created a calendar using a particular album of photos, now I would like to add a few random photos from other albums, is this possible? I can't see any way to access photos other than those I originally selected. Thanks.