Sony RX100: quality of RAW conversions in LR 4.2 RC

Hi,
I've just purchased a Sony RX100 as a replacement for an aging Canon S90. Before that I've tried the fantastic Olympus OM-D (but returned it because of a - for me - serious issue with the Sony-sourced sensor, see here http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1008&message=42126356 and because the support for camera calibration profiles in LR was non-existing). I'm happy to concede that I'm spoiled by the fantastic support LR provides for my D700 and even, S90 RAW images...
So with that background I've approached the RX100 images with a healty portion of scepticism. What I've found surprised me:
1) the standard Adobe Standard camera calibration setting gave the best results, the other profiles gave strange (magenta) color casts, especially with direct sun light.
2) I've found that images taken in parallel with my old S90 to give much nicer colors (though of course with a lot less resolution and more noise) - but again the colors looked much nicer, especially skies, greenery etc. I've also noted (and this was also present with the OM-D images) that the Sony image conversions has a touch too much red tint, which I had to correct manually (this doesn't happen with D700 and S90 images).
So, I'd like to post my first impressions here for comments ;-)
Did anybody else have similar results? Maybe I did something wrong?

Is the DNG opened in PS as a normal picture (not in the ACR dialoge!) with the title "xyz.DNG"? If that is the case, it is actually correct. When LR detects a compatible ACR (which happened after you installed ACR 6.7), it will pass the raw/DNG directly to PS without rendering a TIFF on its own. The file name indicated by photoshop is the original raw/DNG file then.
When you save the picture in photoshop, it will create the actual image file using the file type and other options (color space, bit depth...) you configured in Lightroom. So the outcome of the whole "edit in..." action is exactly what you want, with Photoshop creating the image file at the time you save it.
P.S. What happened before updating to ACR 6.7 was that probably sometimes before, the ACR compatibility warning dialog appeared and you chose "render using lightroom", causing LR to produce the TIFF file on its own and Photoshop to load that TIFF file, and consequently also displaying "xyz.TIFF". Now that LR considers ACR 6.7 as compatible, that behaviour is replaced with the new behaviour as described above - and the warning dialog no longer appears.

Similar Messages

  • RAW conversion with Aperture

    Has anyone compared the quality of RAW conversion of Aperture vs. Nikon Capture as well as other converters?
    I really like the quality of nikon capture and would not want to purchase aperture unless the conversion was at least equivalent.
    Thanks for any input.
    mark
    G4 17" Laptop   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

    I've compared Aperture's conversion side by side with Adobe Camera Raw's. My method was to do some conversions with Camera Raw and save the result along with the RAW file. Then, in the Apple Store, I performed the conversions using Aperture.
    The results from Aperture are not good. They look okay at reduced size, but if you look more closely, the de-mosaicing Aperture performs is quite bad. On some images it is only "somewhat" worse than Camera Raw; on others it is so bad as to be unusable. Shadow detail suffers the most, but highlights are not immune. Some images showed color fringing that was not present in the Camera Raw conversion, even with all chromatic aberration adjustments set to zero in Camera Raw.
    I ignored differences in color and tonal rendering because I did not have enough time with Aperture to learn to get the best results out of it in terms of color. It takes a while to figure out how to get good color out of a RAW converter.
    In no case was Aperture as good as Adobe Camera Raw in terms of image quality. The difference was immediately obvious at 100% magnification.
    I would not use Aperture for RAW conversion.
    EDIT: I forgot to mention, in case it matters, my camera is a Nikon D2X.

  • RAW conversion comments

    I respect a photographers personal opinions regarding their perceptions of differing quality levels in RAW conversions but in the commercial world these perceived differences between Aperture and say ACR are so minimal they certainly do not qualify as a deal breaker.
    In the real world of commercial photography, design and printing, photo images are ultimately used as 8 bit CMYK files or when used for Giclee printing as 8 bit RGB files. These files go through so much retouching and manipulation after the RAW conversion that the esoteric quality differences talked about in these posts are irrelevant.
    The proper use of any Camera RAW converter is to balance the image before outputting it as a 16 bit TIFF or PSD for refined manipulation in Photoshop. This would include refined levels adjustments sometimes with layer masks and appropriate sharpening at the final output size.
    We typically use the RAW converter to:
    1- Pull back highlights that appeared to be blown
    2- Open shadow detail that appeared to be plugged
    3- Correct color casts and saturation
    4- In some cases add special effects such as conversion to rich B&W
    Very few serious professionals in either the commercial or fine arts world are going to use the RAW conversion as their final image.
    We can argue forever about the pros and cons of this or that RAW conversion quality, but in the real world Aperture's solution, while not absolutely perfect, does an excellent job within a program that enhances real world productivity.
    Dual 2ghz G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

    Tom...
    With respect, your logic is hard to accept. You state that in the commercial world, images are typically so heavily manipulated that initially quality of RAW conversion is non-issue.
    I am surprised that no one has bothered to challenge this idea. So I'll step up.
    If my RAW conversion out of ANY program is going to introduce banding artifacts, 'parquet flooring' patterns, or other noisy type data into solidly colored areas, that will need to be fixed in this manipulation of which you speak. Who could justify having to do this sort of thing when there are perfectly good RAW converters out there that don't add this particular headache to the workflow?
    Your message states that "Apertures solution, while not absolutely perfect, does an excellent job within a program that enhances real world productivity."
    That statement stands as a contradiction when you consider that extra 'fixing' may need to be done to some images coming straight out of Apertures RAW conversion.
    I suspect that you (and others) are not seeing problems because evidence is mounting to support the idea that Apertures RAW conversion works better for some flavors of RAW than others. So, perhaps some people are seeing consisten image trashing, and some not. If this is the case, one could easily understand why some are 'satisfied' and some are positively livid.
    However, I digress. I still don't agree at all with the idea that in the commercial world a substandard RAW conversion would make an acceptable starting point for any commercial image, regardless of how much manipulation down the track its going to go through. I can't see any art director being satisfied knowing this was going on in their shop.
    "Aperture - sure it mangles your images, but it does a heck of a job keeping track of them!"
    Jim

  • Adobe Bridge CS6 (Mac) won't open .arw files from my Sony RX100. How do I get and install the right version of Camera Raw?

    Adobe Bridge CS6 (Mac) won't open .arw files from my Sony RX100. I was told to update Camera Raw to at least 7.2. I tried to download this but got a DNG Converter instead. Where is Camera Raw? (it does not show up in a search of my hard drive. There is a folder of camera profiles but no extension or plug-in with this name). How do I find out what version I have already? How do I get the correct version?  . . . OR . . . is it the case that Bridge will never open Sony raw files directly and I will have to do a separate conversion process every time I want to use a raw file??. Can someone explain this?
    Thanks.

    A Good samaritan answered this for me on another forum
    How to update Camera Raw

  • Lack supporting Sony RX100 II in Adobe Camera RAW

    Please, integrate full support Sony RX100 & RX100 II to Adobe Camera RAW. This is a very good and expensive cameras. I replace my Nikon D5100 with Sony RX100 II, and second gives better quality despite very small size. But support in Camera RAW limited to opening ARW files — there are no lens profiles for this cameras: automatic correction of chromatic aberration, distortion and vignetting does not work.

    Hi,
    That specific camera doesn't seem supported as far as lens correction profiles in the latest camera raw 8.2 in photoshop cs6/cc, but you could download the
    the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader and search for one.
    http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.displayTab2.html
    The best match i could find is for the Sony RX100, so you can try them and see if they are satisfactory.
    After you download the profile(s), they should show up in camera raw.

  • Raw File update: how to open Sony RX100 III files in CS5?

    I cannot download updates for CS5 Extended for Sony Raw.
    How can I update my Photoshop CS5 Extended to permit it to handle Raw files from my Sony RX100 III on my Mac?

    Camera Raw plug-in | Supported cameras
    Camera Raw-compatible Adobe applications
    The RX100 III was first supported in Camera Raw 8.5 which is only compatible with CS6 and later.
    So there is no Camera Raw plugin for CS5 which will open Raw files from that camera.
    Options:
    1. Upgrade to CS6
    2. Join the Cloud
    3. Free option: download the Adobe DNG Converter, convert all RX100 III Raw files to DNG format then edit the DNG files in CS5 Photoshop Help | Digital Negative (DNG)

  • I'm running LR 4.4.  Just picked up a Sony RX100 M3 cam. It's RAW files are not supported within my version. Is there a free update still available for my version or do I need to purchase an upgrade to LR5?

    I'm running LR 4.4.  Just picked up a Sony RX100 M3 cam. It's RAW files are not supported within my version. Is there a free update still available for my version or do I need to purchase an upgrade to LR 5?

    Camera Raw plug-in | Supported cameras
    The Sony RX100 III was first supported in Lightroom 5.5.
    There will be no updates for older versions.
    So your choices:
    Upgrade to Lightroom 5, or
    Download the free Adobe DNG converter, convert all Raw files from the RX100 III to DNG format then edit the DNGs in Lightroom 4.4
    Photoshop Help | Digital Negative (DNG)

  • Sony RX100 Raw in Lightroom 4?

    Has Adobe published anything in LR4 to handle raw files from Sony RX100?

    I have Canons and I got the RX100 as a pocket point-and-shoot. It does a great job for that, a good solid all-around P&S camera. I find the low-light settings a bit frustrating, but in a very low-light situation I just set it on manual at a high shutter speed and get some pictures that I'm very happy about.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/metasailor/8595137861/in/set-72157633102253533/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/metasailor/sets/72157633102253533/with/8595137861/

  • I have a sony rx100 and my version of lightroom (4) will not recognize the raw (.ARW) files. Please help!

    I have a sony rx100 and my version of lightroom (4) will not recognize the raw (.ARW) files. Please help!

    I have version 4.4.1 on my computer now, which is functioning properly - but does not read the .ARW files. When I download the link you sent and try to open it, it pops up as version 5 and I get this image (attached). This is my first time in one of these threads, not sure if i have to reply to each of you individually?
    DdeGannes, could you please tell me how to recover the serial number from my operating system?
    Thank you SO much everyone!

  • Anyone else seeing distortion on raw Sony RX100 images again?

    This issue has occurred at least twice since the Sony RX100 came out, and has been fixed twice, but now I seem to be experiencing it a THIRD time. Is it just me, or is this happening to anyone else again-again-again?
    I'm running the latest Mavericks, the latest iPhoto, and whatever the current version of Camera RAW is as of June 2014. I don't know exactly when this "happened" because I haven't edited much in the past month or two, but what I'm seeing is that my raw images from my RX100 are randomly displaying distorted (as if the lens data is being interpreted incorrectly) either in view mode, editing mode, or both. The thumbnail view is always correct...which is the dead giveaway that something is amiss and the images are in fact showing up "wrong."
    If nobody else is seeing this, I'll just make sure my library is safely backed up and wipe my notebook completely and see if I can fix it. However if others are seeing this please chime in so we'll all know we're not crazy and so we can collaborate on getting Apple made well aware that this has somehow broken yet one more time...

    It's super frustrating too, because the editing window comes up correctly at first...but after about a second the image stretches out and looks all wonky.
    Try, if reprocessing the RAW files will help.
    Export one of the distorted files (File > EXport, Kind Originial), and then reimport it.
    That should reprocess the original RAW file, using the reinstalled RAW support.
    Can you now edit the file?  If yes, back up your iPhoto library and try, if rebuilding the library will reprocess all RAW files. 

  • Sony RX100 raw files converted with DNG converter not recognizable

    Since  installing Maverick 10.9.4 on the Mac, Sony RX100 raw files converted with DNG converter are no more recognizable.
    Somebody else the same problem?

    I know my DNG files themselves and the info they contain are fine. But they're not properly supported in Mavericks 10.9.4 and I don't plan on switching to Windows. A file that I converted to a DNG using Adobe software is now listed as an unrecognized file in OSX. No thumbnails, no iPhoto, no Aperture. Essentially, no support. And this is a problem. A quick search will show you people with various Sony cameras (A7, RX100 mkI and mkIII, at least) having the same problem.
    No matter where the blame falls, the simple fact is that if you shoot with various Sony cameras, use Adobe software to convert the file to DNG and happen to be an OSX user, you're files are no longer compatible with OSX or Apple's photo software. They will only open in Adobe software. You literally get a warning message from OSX saying, this is an unsupported file type when you try and open it.
    Like I said previously, I've had a managed iPhoto library for about 5 years now, numerous hours of tagging and organzing, and every DNG file converted from a Sony ARW RAW is currently unsupported. Original ARW files work just fine. It's nuts. Maybe it's Adobe's fault. Maybe it's Apple's fault. It really doesn't matter. If DNG is not a reliable standard format under certain edge cases (Sony ARW, DNG converter, OSX Mavericks), it's not a reliable standard format at all. I just hope that Apple or Adobe figures this out, so that I can get those photos back.
    In the mean time, certain users such as myself just can't rely on DNG. End of story.

  • Sony RX100 M2 RAW Files

    Does Elements 11 support Sony RX100 M2 RAW Files?

    Camera raw 8 supported it .
    Please update the ACR plug-in PSE 11 (if it is not supported)
    http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.html#supportedcameras
    thanks,

  • Does PSE11 support Sony RX100 raw files?

    does pse 11 open raw files from sony rx100?
    Message title was edited by: Brett N

    No but it should be in the next update as it's already in release candidate 7.2
    PSE11 shipps with camera raw version 7.1

  • RAW file Sony RX100 Elements 9

    Using Photoshop Elements 9, I installed the camera RAW plug-in 6.5.0.216 to be able to open the RAW pictures from my new Sony RX100. This camera is said to be supported, but Elements can not open it: wrong file-type, it says! The camera RAW plug-in + right version is in the listing of plug-ins, extension *.ARW is mentioned for the file-types to choose from when trying to open a file, but a window appears, telling me ARW can't be opened: wrong file-type.
    Already started the computer cold, re-installed the plug-in, but no opening of the Sony ARW camera RAW file.
    Does anybody know what to do? Thanks

    You need ACR version 7.2 for the RX100:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
    Only PSE11 can have 7.2, so to be able to use your raw files with PSE9 you should download the free Adobe DNGconverter which can batch convert a whole folder of raw files into the Adobe raw DNG format which your PSE9 can open.
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/multi/troubleshoot-camera-raw-photoshop-photoshop.html
    http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5486
    http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5518

  • Digital Camera RAW Update 5.02 breaks Sony RX100 lens distortion correction (AGAIN!)

    Just like with the Digital Camera RAW Update 4.08, the latest 5.02 update breaks the Sony RX100 lens distortion correction again. I'm reverted back to 5.01 until this is fixed.
    From your Time Machine backup, restore the previous versions of
    /System/Library/CoreServices/RawCamera.bundle
    /System/Library/CoreServices/RawCameraSupport.bundle

    Yes, I noticed it too, but I wasn't certain it was 5.02 that did it as I sold my RX100 and haven't processes any files for a while. Then as part of the NR discussion here I looked at some old RX100 files, and the distortion correction now disappears. Unfortunately I can't really revert to 5.01 because I was waiting on the A7 support 5.02 brought.
    Apple are aware of it, so hopefully the fix will be quick to arrive.
    Andy

Maybe you are looking for