SOP: Copy Level-by-level to Level-by-level

Hi,
I would be very grateful if someone could give some explanations (maybe tutorials), examples or just simple advices about how to implement a copy from one Level-to-level information structure to another Level-to-level information structure in flexible planning in SOP?
Thanks in advance and best regards.
Ben.

Hi
Can you pl. be specific as to what do you want to copy.
whether data to be copied form in infostructure to the other, or the infostructure itslelf copy & creat new one.?
Regards
YMREDDY

Similar Messages

SAP REACH Compliance (SRC) - Copy real sub usage to pure sub level

Dear all,
I hope you can help me out. I have searched these forums, oss notes and SAP/TechniData documentation but cannot find a clear answer/description to the following:
I am currently working on a SRC 1.1 SP03 implementation at the customer site. Currently, I am wondering how the imported uses on real substance level (after receiving an AIF) would be copied to the pure substance level. Is there a check that can be used to copy the uses from the real substance level to the related pure substance?
Best regards,
Jeffrey Orth

Hello,
You need to carry out Inbound email processing - You need to select appropriate variant either Supplier / Customer mails
Then need to carry out Customer / Supplier tasks execution in Compliance Workbench. Then system tranfers the data onto pure substance level and you can carry out check to ensure all the necessary data is collected.
Thanks
Jayakumar

Delivery address at Item Level and not at the Header Level

Hello Experts,
We are facing an issue as described below:-
We are in SRM 7.0 using classic scenario.
After approval of multi line Shopping Cart in SRM ,PR's are getting
automatically created in backend R/3 system.After converting PR's into
POs in backend R/3,we are observing that the delivery address for these
PO'are getting printed at Item level and not at the Header Level
inspite of the delivery address being same for all the Item level.
As desired,the delivery address in the PO's should have the delivery
address at the header level if the the delivery address is identical
for all the Item Levels.
However,if we create a PR directly in R/3 system and then convert these
PR's into PO's in the backend R/3 system,we find that the deliver
address are getting printed at the Header Level if the delivery address
is same for all the item level(which is as desired)
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
RKS

It is standard process only.
In Po delivery address is maintained at item level because to which address perticular material to be delivered,
this may change from material to material or may not change

Planni values at cost element group level instead of at cost element level

Is it possible to plan values at cost element group level instead of at cost element level in BI?
Similary I have another question for financial statements.
Is it possible to plan values at financial statement level instead of at G/ in BPS or SEM?
Thanks

Hi.
It depends on what you mean "cost element group".
If you mean node (not leaf) in hierarchy so the answer is NO.
If cost element group is regular characteristic so the answer is YES.
Regards.

Copy GL Accounts at Chart of Account level

Hi gurus
I want to copy all my GL accounts (which created centrally) to another Chart of Accounts at COA level only(FSPO).
Can any one help how to copy GL Accounts at COA Level.
Thanks in advance
Hari P

Hi,
Please go to OBY7. Enter the COA and Ref COA. All your GL from Ref COA will get copied in newly created COA.
Regards,
Jigar

Copy sharepoint 2013 subsite names to top level site list

How could I copy sharepoint 2013 subsite names to a top site list by using workflow?

Hi,
In SharePoint 2013, we can use REST API to get all the subsite names in workflow, then add the values in to the list.
REST URI:
http://WEBAPPURL/sites/SITENAME/_api/web/webs?$select=Title
Calling the SharePoint 2013 Rest API from a SharePoint Designer Workflow
http://sergeluca.wordpress.com/2013/04/09/calling-the-sharepoint-2013-rest-api-from-a-sharepoint-designer-workflow/
Best Regards
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support

Copy level zero value member to other level zero members under a parent

Hi,
I am entering data against a dummy costcentre. I will need allocate the value to other costcentres which sit under a parent. I tried @relative("parent member",0) = '"dummy costcentre". I have this within a fix statement.
I have tried datacopy but it doesn't like the @relative. I looked at set and calc but no solution jumps out. I am sure this is possible. I would appreciate any suggestions.
I could hard code each CC i.e. dummy = CC but this would require a script update everytime a new CC was added or one removed.
Thanks,
nathan
Edited by: Acts4:12 on 06-Oct-2010 02:51

Hi,
it would help to see your FIX statement, but I would calc it in the following way (using another dimension, e.g. the scenario):
FIX (@relative("parent menber",0))
"scenario1"
"scenario1"="scenario1"->"dummy costcentre"
ENDFIX

About the effect for batch level conversion from material to plant level

Dears,
Now we use batch management at material level in our system, now we want to change to batch level from material level to plant level, what effects or risks it will bring during the process of conversion?
Thanks a lot
Zhongkai

Hi
check the following SAP help link it is very helpful:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/es/d2/1d4b6e5733d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm
at the link you can find the following
Specify batch level and activate status management
In this IMG activity, you specify the following:
the level at which batch numbers are unique
whether batch status management is active in the client
the plants in which batch status management is active
the initial status of new batches
Batch level
Batch numbers can be unique at the following levels:
at plant level
at material level
at client level for a material
If you choose plant level, the batch number is unique in conjunction with the respective material and the plant. If you choose material level, the batch number is unique together with the material. At client level, the batch number is unique in the whole client.
To change the batch level, you have to start a conversion program. This program first checks whether conversion is possible and outputs an error log containing all batch numbers that occur more than once at the new level. Now you need to manually transfer these batch records to numbers within Inventory Management using a transfer posting 'material to material'.
If you change the level from plant level to a higher level, it is possible that batches with the same batch numbers in different plants are actually identical. In this case, all you have to do is remove stocks (including previous period stocks) so that all batches with the same batch numbers, except one, can be reorganized.
When you convert from plant level to material level, the material is then to be handled in batches in all plants in which it is defined.
Standard settings
In the standard R/3 System, batches are unique at plant level.
Activities
To change the batch level, proceed as follows:
      1. Choose the level at which you want your batches to be unique.
      2. Save the new settings and choose Back.
      3. Select function Batch level -> Conversion.
      4. If necessary, carry out the conversion in test mode first.
Further notes
Note that you cannot reset conversion from plant level to a higher level in the standard.
If you create a client by copying an existing client, initially, there are no settings in the target client at batch level. The system makes the settings in the target client only when you have carried out an activity (maintaining master data or posting a goods movement, for example).
SETTINGS BEFORE/AFTER CLIENT COPY:
Source client Target client
Client level Material level
Material level Material level
Plant level Plant level
Batch status management
Batch status management is an additional function provided by the standard R/3 System.
Standard settings
Batch status management is not active in the standard R/3 system.
Activities
To activate batch status management, proceed as follows:
      1. Choose Batch status management active.
      2. Save the new setting and choose Back.
      3. Choose Batch status management -> conversion.
      4. If necessary, carry out the conversion in test mode first.
Further notes
Batch status management is linked to the batch level. At material and at plant level, the status management settings are valid within the client, that is for all plants. However, if you have defined batches to be unique at plant level, you have to select the plants in which status management is to be active using function Plants with status management.
If you activate status management, all existing batches are assigned status 'unrestricted'. If you deactivate status management, the systems transfers all restricted batches to unrestricted stock within conversion. Restricted stock only exists if status management is active.
If you create a client by copying an existing client, status management is automatically activated if batches exist in the target client, independent of the settings in the source client. If no batches exist in the target client, it is not activated. In this case, you have to activate or deactivate status management manually, if required.
Plants with batch status management
Activities
To select the plants in which status management is to be active, proceed as follows:
      1. Set characteristic Batch status management for those plants in which batch status management is to be active.
      2. Save your settings and choose function Back.
      3. Choose function Batch status management -> conversion
      4. If necessary, carry out the conversion in test mode first.
Initial status of a new batch
Using this function, you can specify for each material type which initial status new batches are to be assigned. However, if you use a quality management system, this specifies the status of the batches.
Hope it will help
Best Regards

When KF value only provided at higher level and not at more detailed level

Dear Experts
I have a multiprovider consisting 2 DSOs:
1. DSO for price.
Eg.
Char-A__Char-sub1___Char-sub2___KF_PRICE
AAAA__ AA11________AA22________$10
AAAA__AA11_________AA23_______ $17
As shown above, AAAA is made up of 2 sub-items AA22 and AA23 , each priced differently.
2. DSO for Qty
Char-A____KF_QTY
AAAA_____200
As shown above, this DSO for quantity does not have sub-item qty. What should be the quantities for each sub-item? Its always exactly the same as the Qty at Char-A level . Eg. 200 pieces of AAAA is made up of 200 pieces of AA22 and AA23.
The user wants to drilldown to sub-item levels to see Price X Qty.
I tested, when not drilled down to these levels, the display and figures are correct.
But when drilled down , the report will have additional line for each record due to the fact that the Qty is not at sub-item level.
So, qty will be shown in another line and the price will be on the line with the sub-item.
How can this situation be resolved using BEx? Else, I would use staging to resolve this. But I am hoping BEx level can resolve it. If staging is used, I would need to copy the same qty to each sub-item for each record by adding qty field into Price DSO or union the 2 DSOs into 1 DSO. But I thought Multiprovider is already a Union?
Kindly could you provide me some advice, clues or opinion?
Thanks in advance.
My Best regards
Pascal

Hi,
This issue can be resolved by using constant selection
For step by step approach please refer the below pdf.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/70dcd7b5-6a3d-2d10-c984-e835e37071a2?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
Hope it helps.
Regards,
AL

Top Level folder doesn't show lowver level pictures - Lightroom2

I have my pictures stored by year and location on a hard drive    example
2009
    Heaven
       April
    Hell
         April
As I remember each upper level would show the counte of sub folders which allowed me to do sorts on ratings and the like
Now only the bottom most folder has the count..
2009                0
    Heaven       0
       April        20
    Hell            0
         April      5
I tried importing everything into a new catalog with np luck.. ONly the bottom most folers seems to have the count
how did I break it??

You have to enable include photos in subitems (I think that was the name) in one of the menus in Library.

Pls tel me what is the diffrence between snapshot isolation level of mssql and oracels isolation level

Hi,
In mssql i am using following things.
I have two database D1 and D2, i am using snapshot isolation (ALTER DATABASE MyDatabase
SET ALLOW_SNAPSHOT_ISOLATION ON) in both database.
Following is the situation.
1) There is one SP sp1 ( it can be in any database d1 or d2), it updates d2 from d1.
2) d2 is used for reading by web, execept above SP sp1
3) d1 gets updation from web in readcommite isolation.
4) both database will be on same instence of mssql.
Q1) wanted to know how to implement the same thing in oracle 11x express edition.
Q2) is there any diffrence between snapshot isolation level of mssql and oracel.
any link would be help full.
yours sincerely

>Q1) should i set the option to OFF after the process(ts) is complete
No keep it on.
>Q2) ALLOW_SNAPSHOT_ISOLATION ON , will affect other isolation level's transactions
No it will not affect any other transaction isolation level.
>Q3) is my choice of isolation level for process(ts) is correct or there can be any other solution.
Seems fine, although there are probably many other solutions.
David
David http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dbrowne/

Blank Records showing at Infoprovider level..how to eliminate@ Report level

Hello Experts,
I am facing an issue. For a particular matierial in the Bex Report 2 KF values must be equl.
this is the complete scenario:
Matirial Total Target Actual Val BIO Actual Val
81271071 9550,52 4,793,67
In the above scenario Total Target Actual Val must be equl to Bio Actual Val.
I checked all the restrictions on the KF. 2 KFs are restricted by the same KF (Condition Base Value I ) .
Other than that for KF Total Target Actual Val restrictions are on Condition Type, Matierial Group 3. And for the KF BIO Actual Val restrictions are Red Group For Rebate.
I checked the data @ Infoprovider level for both the Good and Bad Test Cases. And found that for the Bad Test Case, if i give the input for Red Group for Rebate charactoristic there is no blank records are showing and where as if i will not give the input for Red Group for Rebate there are some blank records are showing up and adding those blank records.
Where as for the Good Test Case even if i provided the input for Red Group for Rebate or not, there is no blank records are showing up and in the report both the KFs are showing the equal values itself..
user requirement is at the report level both the KFs must be equal.
Here in the above up to now what i have done, i have provided the information.
requesting all, kindly give me the reply how can i solve this issue. Expecting more and more bright suggestions .
Thanks,
SN.

Just a quick question. Have you restricted your KFs unnecessarily? Are the semantic keys valid if debited? Like, sometimes the clearing doc #s are no entered for a open po# and necessary for a closed one. In such case, have you checked if the semantic key is correctly defined? Cubes must help you aggregate data & reflect them within one line item as in your case.

How to perform high-level planning without doing full costctr-level rollup

I am wondering what my options are for this effort - we want to start our 2009 budget season by first preparing a high-level 2009 plan. To do the high-level plan we'd like to avoid building and interfacing workbooks at the cost center level; instead, to get started, we want to look at groups of cost centers that represent the different lines of business of the Bank (retail, credit, etc).
Here's my question:is it possible to build planning workbooks not at the cost center level, but at a cost center rollup level? That is, we'd like to avoid having 10 workbooks at the cost center level that make up the rollup "Mortgage Lending"; instead we want one workbook for Mortgage lending that includes data for all 10 of those CC's.
Please let me know if you have any ideas as to how to do so, thanks, W

I am wondering what my options are for this effort - we want to start our 2009 budget season by first preparing a high-level 2009 plan. To do the high-level plan we'd like to avoid building and interfacing workbooks at the cost center level; instead, to get started, we want to look at groups of cost centers that represent the different lines of business of the Bank (retail, credit, etc).
Here's my question:is it possible to build planning workbooks not at the cost center level, but at a cost center rollup level? That is, we'd like to avoid having 10 workbooks at the cost center level that make up the rollup "Mortgage Lending"; instead we want one workbook for Mortgage lending that includes data for all 10 of those CC's.
Please let me know if you have any ideas as to how to do so, thanks, W

Planning level to be added in aggregation level

Hi,
Currently my aggregation level has the following elements:
1. Plant
2. Sales Group
3. Cutomer
Now I need to change from Plant to Customer Plant. Following are my queries on the same:
1. Can I add customer plant in addition to plant in the aggregation level?
2. Hence forth I would be doing planning on customer plant level, will that be an issue?
3. Will there be any issue with the historical data already planned at plant level?
Kindly help me with the above issue.
Regards,
Bhushan

Hi Bhushan,
1. You can add freely your additional characteristic and your model will technically keep on working ,of course you will need to adjust the filters and functions to the new aggregation level of data
2. Again you will need to adjust your business logic in all components of the aggregation level (filters ,functions)
3.Historical data is apearing currently under Customer Plant = '#' ,you should consider reposting historical data in order to align current with historical data
Regards,
Eitan.

ITunes volume level vs. OS X volume level

Hello,
Is there any method to "lock" the iTunes volume level to OS X? Ie. i don't want two options to adjust volume level (inside iTunes and in OS X on my MacBook Pro). I just want one. The thing is that i want to be able to adjust the volume level using the Remote app on my iphone. But i always leave the volume bar on max inside iTunes, so i'm only able to decrease the volume and not increase it.
Let me explain this with an example:
iTunes is playing some song.
iTunes volume is a 100%
OS X volume is at 50%
I'm not next to my computer and i wan't to increase the volume of the music.
I pull out my iphone from my pocket, launch Remote and the volume bar is at 100% - hence i'm only able to decrease the volume.
Until now i would turn down the volume in itunes to lets say 50% and the volume in OS X to 100%. That way i would be able to both de- and increase the volume from the Remote. But this means that all other sound on my MacBook is at 100% and that is sometimes too loud.
So what i would like some patch or app that adjust the volume in itunes if i manually adjust the OS X volume, to match the same percentage. And vice versa; if i adjust the volume in itunes (inside itunes on my mac or through the Remote app) it should adjust the it should automatically adjust it to the corresponding percentage in OS X.
Thanks.

are you using Sound Check?

SOP: Copy Level-by-level to Level-by-level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for