Sorting without headers

I am creating a book list and want to sort my columns without the headers. The header is sorted within my document.
Help - thanks

Look in that same forums "Questions and Answers" area. I already posted 2 & 3, Just posted Four last night. Starting work on 5 now.
Numbers templates.com Forums
Leave me feedback on what you think. I tried to make them short (5-10 pages each). So its an easy comfortable read. The whole book is about 30 pages right now.
Using Pages as the word processor. Cmd-Shift-4 for screen shots. Nothing special beyond that.
Hope you like the rest too... anyone else is invited to look at it too. Its free (my wife thinks we should publish when its done, maybe as an ebook) Your my 'Peer reviewers' and 'editors' I guess.
Thanks,
Jason

Similar Messages

Option to Copy (without headers) gone??

I am using SSMS 2008 R2 (Version 10.50.4000.0). As of this week, I can no longer copy my results without headers. My settings are Results to grid and I have double-checked that under Tools -> options my Query Results, Results to Grid does
NOT have the option "Include column headers when copying or saving the results" checked.
When I right click in my result set, I still see both options; "Copy" and "Copy with Headers". No matter which when I use, I get column headers when I paste into Excel. I do this every week and this is the first time this has happened.
(I did get updates this morning.)
Is this happening to anyone else??

Hi,
According to your description, I do a test in SQL Server 2008 R2 (version 10.50.4000.0), everything works well. I copy my query results without headers, and paste the data into Excel successfully. Below is my setting of Tools/options in SQL Server. Please
restart the SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) after you change the following settings.
Thanks,
Lydia Zhang

How to open iWork 08 blank file without headers?

Hi, couldn't find an answer for my question on the forms, so here it goes...
Is there a way to set Numbers '08 to open new files without Column and Row Headers? I know how to remove and/or delete them, but this is not what I'm looking for. I want to start all new documents without the headers. Is it possible?
Thanks, Vlad.

Hello Vlad,
Whenever you begin a new document, you are opening a Template. Often we use the blank template provided with Numbers, but we are free to make our own templates without Headers and with any settings we find convenient. Prepare a document that is just the way you would always like to begin your work and then File > Save as Template.
When you want to start a new document, File > New from Template > My Templates, choose your special template.
Regards,
Jerry

I sorted my worksheet and it saved the sort without asking if I wanted to save it! How did this happen?

I am on a mac mini OS X Yosemite using Numbers 3.5.2.
I opened an existing spreadsheet, sorted one of the columns, then closed it out so I could open it and it would no longer be sorted (the sort screwed up all my headings), and the sort was saved! Why did it save my sort without asking if I wanted to save the changes?

Hi Julia,
System Preferences > General > Ask to keep changes when closing documents
This may recover the previous version:
Regards,
Ian.

Open items sorting without +/- sign

Hi SAP GURU's,
i would like to display the open items without +/- sign when i will try to sort. it is possible in edit options in while clearing. but when i will try to display the open items i can not get that option.
Please send the solution as early as possible.
your assistance will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
suresh konisetty.

Suresh,
Not possible w/o +/- sorting.

Private APIs without headers

A have a framework and an app.
To access the content (executable) of the framework I must use the headers in that framework. But in other environments like the Microsoft's .Net Framework, You can dynamically reflect (scan) DLLs to find out classes, methods, events and more.
So I think this way: .Net Framework is a "virtual" environment. The CLR links objects at runtime. It knows all the names of all the objects. I have read (and not one time) that the Objective-C Runtime also dynamicaly binds objects and knows the objects names. By "object names" I mean class names (NSString, NSLock...), method names (InitWithSomething...) and so on.
And so why can't my app link to frameworks directly without header files?
I could have the whole header file in a string and the Objective-C Runtime would have all the info that it needs. This way I could use Private APIs on iOS and Apple couldn't detect it.
If I'm wrong could someone please tell me where is the error.

It's a SECRET!

Sorting without reloading the page

Hi,
I'd like to know how processing several sorting operations without reloading and ask the database each time the sorting of the elements is made.
For that I guess a copy of the result tree obtained by the sql query, written in the xsql page, must be present in memory and always available for the several sorting processes (but is this a temporary xml document which is created? How handle and use this "copy"?). So, one and only one access to the database would be required.
But I don't know how such a thing works?
Thanks a lot to help me on this point.
Bye

You can easily do that by implementing the apex error handling function.
See this working example http://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=46417:10
Login as test/test
By default APEX shows an javascript alert message, I actually overwrote the native alert to show a message div using jquery
function alert(message) {
// console.info(message);
var msgBox = $('#msg-box');
if (msgBox.length === 0) {
msgBox = $('<div />', { 'id': 'msg-box'}).hide().prependTo('body');
msgBox.html(message+' <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="$(\'#msg-box\').hide();">X</a>').fadeIn(500);
}See {message:id=10735215}

Trying to EXPORT-CSV without headers - Tried suggestions in forum - still stuck

I am tryling to get the contents of my array out to a CSV with no neader records. I looked for examples here and on other sites but I still cannot get it working.
Below is the latest attempt and the 1st row of te output. I end up with a CSV with the corect records and no headers, but with a single column of data. Note below that the first element in the row is un-quoted, but each element after is enclosed
in quotes.
I feel like I am close, but need help to get there.
Thanks
-- CODE --
$NormalBatch |
Select "Rec_Type","PO","Customer","Invoice","Ship","Date","B1","Name","Addr1","Addr2","City","State","Zip","Country","Line","Qty","Unit","Site","Carton"
|
ConvertTo-Csv |
Select -Skip 2 |
Out-File "c:\users\user\desktop\todo\normalbatch.csv"
-- RESULT --
INVOICE,"123456789","VENDOR.COM","4013596","UPSG-Ground","12/1/2014","","NORM AVERAGE","123 MAIN ST.","","YOUR TOWN","HI","1235","","","","","",""

Hi Tom,
If you want to remove header from csv file, please refer to the script below which will export processes without header:
$i="d:\output.csv"
$o="d:\test.csv"
get-process|select name, id|Export-Csv $i
Import-Csv $i |select name,id | Export-Csv -path $o -NoTypeInformation
(Get-Content $o | Select-Object -Skip 1) | Set-Content $o
If there is anything else regarding this issue, please feel free to post back.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click here.
Best Regards,
Anna Wang
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Sorting without quering???

Hello,
is there any way that we can sort a block by a column without executing the query again...if yes then please tell me how can i achieve this,,
I have a form based on view made on columns form three different tables having 5000 records and i have a button that sorts a particular column in ascending/descending order when pressed..
I am currently uisng the execute_query et the end of my sorting code. and is taking 8 seconds to sort the block when the button is pressed.
the block show 24 records at a time..
I just want to know if there is any way that we can sort the data without quering again as the data is already in the form..and it will not take 8 seconds..
thanks in advance
regards,

I do not query 5000 records on first execute query, only 24 records are
retieved when the form runs and for 24 records it is still taking 8 seconds.Then something has gone wrong. Even if the server is doing a full-table-scan to order the 5000 records, then passing the first 24 to your form, that should only take about a second.
Have you done something by mistake, like setting the block's Query All Records property to Yes, or maybe issued a Last_Record; command after the query?
And how long does a similar query take in SQL Plus? You can test it this way:
Declare
Cursor C is
    -- this select should have the same where and order by as in your form:
    Select col_1, colL_2, etc...
     from whatever_tables
     where ...
     order by col_A, col_B, etc... ;
R C%rowtype;
Begin
Open C;
for i in 1..24 loop
    Fetch C into R;
end loop;
Close C;
End;
/

Sort without BY addition & Table Key

Experts,
From SAP Help,
If no explicit sort key is entered using the BY addition, the internal table itab is sorted according to the table key.
I have code as below,
data: lt_vkonto type table of VKONT_KK. "Cont Acc No
"Fetch Cont Acc no against Contract
select vkonto from ever into table lt_vkonto where vertrag = wa_data-vertrag.
if sy-subrc eq 0.
sort lt_vkonto.
endif.
As seen above, I have sort statement without BY addition for internal table lt_vkonto which does not have a UNIQUE or NON UNIQUE key.
Will adding BY addition --> SORT lt_vkonto by vkonto imrpove the performance of sort statement.
Please share your valuable inputs.
BR,
Aspire

Hi
I don't know if you'll imporve the performace in your case, you should do some measurement, the problem should be the table key for a standard internal table (like yours) is the set of all CHAR fields.
In you situation you've only one fields, but probably if the table has several char fields the performance can be improved
Anyway I suppose it's always better to explicit an option else the system will have to deduct it by itself, so the system will do an additional step: in your case without BY, the system has to deduct the key to be used for the sorting.
Max

How do I Link to _blank window without headers?

I am creating a page that links to a flash slide show. When
the user clicks on the link to the slideshow, I want the flash
movie to open up in its own window, without all of the usual
Explorer toolbars and menus at the top of the page. I set the link
to _blank, so I do get a separate window. Now, what is the trick to
getting rid of the junk at the top of the page?
I know it can't be very difficult, but I'm puzzled.
Thanks!

This is a problem with your brother's browser. The code is
correct.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"janeinpa" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:fbi8g5$med$[email protected]..
> Hi, Murry...
>
> Your solution worked great on most of the computers I
tried. However, I
> was
> just at my brother's house & tried to click the link
that opens just the
> slide
> show. I got an error -- something about no object at
line 2. It wouldn't
> open
> the slideshow, but opened a big, blank window. I thought
maybe he needed
> Flash
> Player 9, so I downloaded it, but it still didn't work.
He's using IE 7.
> I
> also turned off his pop up blocker, but that didn't help
either. Any
> ideas? I
> came home & it works great on my computer! You can
see it at
> www.allisonwebcreations.com/africa/slideshow.htm The
link at the bottom
> opens
> the show in its own window.
>

How can you sort without adding all the music to iTunes?

I'm an older person and I don't get it. At first I just had a shuffle and I downloaded specific songs into iTunes that I liked. Then I upgraded. I loaded a whole bunch of cd's into various libraries at various times on an external hard drive. Now, I have a ton of music and would love an easy way to organize it! There are lots of duplicates and lots of songs I just don't like. The trouble is, I haven't figured out how to just see a list of all the songs and sort and delete from the list. I have to open a library and then I get a bunch of file folders of an album or two. Then I have to open the album to see the songs. If I forget what the song sounds like and I click on it to play it, the album goes automatically into iTunes. I don't have enough room on my pc for all that music to go right into iTunes. Do you get my question?? Can you help me?

When you play a song with iTunes, it automatically gets added to the library, as you noticed.
If you just want to play the song so you can decide whether to keep or delete it, use another player. You may already have Windows Media Player on your machine. If not you can download Winamp.
When you are done sorting, add the ones you want into your iTunes library

Non-http servlet without headers

I would like to create a servlet that does not respond to web requests, but to invocations by client sockets (on port 80).
It all goes well, but even if I use a simple Servlet implementation, the web server wraps the response into a http response, and adds headers, which is unnecessary at all times. How can I avoid this?
I use JBoss/Tomcat for container.

Hi,
          import java.io.*;
          import javax.servlet.*;
          public class Helloservlet extends GenericServlet {
          public void service(ServletRequest req,ServletResponse res) throws
          ServletException,IOException {
          res.SetcontentType("text/html");
          PrintWriter pw = new PrintWriter();
          pw.println("<b>HelloWorld"); pw.close();
          The above example code for GenericServlet that is not specific to the http.
          Regards
          Anilkumar kari

How to retrieve main message without Headers

Hi,
I am doing email application. In that, I can send mail successfully
with encrypt format.
but my problem is when i want to decrypt that mail while reading
it gives me error : unknown block type
So plz can anyone tell me how to retrieve the main text(encrypted) message without header.
plz tell me how to do that
regards
Shilpa

Yes a BPM is required. The scenario is as follows:
Receive IDOC from R/3
Transformation using JAVA class mapping program
Switch statement evaluating target structure from JAVA class
               If supporting data required in other system Transformation using another JAVA class
               If supporting data required but not available - end process
               If no supporting data required continue
Switch statement to route output document
Evaluate Target Structure of JAVA class 1 to determine the type of output
.     If email Transformation step to form email for email adapter
     If Industry Standard output - Transformation step that uses another JAVA class
     Evaluate output from JAVA class 1 to determine vendor
     route to appropriate vendor through JAVA class 3 - this module takes the IDOC as input and outputs the industry standard document that will be routed to customer
Send Step send document or email
Within each of our JAVA mapping programs we do additional processing by updating the database and writing to log files. Since there is a significant amount of work being done in the JAVA modules we have the "create new instance" checked in the transformation steps that are using JAVA mapping programs. Eventually this will be unchecked but for now we need it for development. We want to capture the message id of the outbound Industry standard document that is being routed to the customers.

JTree - sorting without collapsing

i have a JTree which represents data stored in my data layer. if this data changes, i do not only have to update the view part in the tree but also resort it to certain criteria. as far as well, this works fair enough, my problem is, that with every resorting, i remove/add children in the JTree which leads to structure changes. notifying them to the JTree results in the collapsing of all the branches under the event source. how can i prevent that? i'd like to just resort the nodes on one level and leave the collapse/expand of the nodes as it was.
tnx for the help!

Thanks for your advice, i tried that but it doesn't seem to work with my code, the effect stays the same. what do i have to change?
Note:
snippetComparator cmp = new MyComparator();
SortedSet sorted = new TreeSet(cmp);
sorted.addAll(this.children);
int i = 0;
for (Iterator it = sorted.iterator(); it.hasNext(); i++) {
DefaultMutableTreeNode element = (DefaultMutableTreeNode)it.next();
this.treeModel.removeNodeFromParent(element);
this.treeModel.insertNodeInto(element, this, i);
<<snippet
this is all i do, no manual creation of any TreeEvents.

Sorting without headers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for