Sortlist - round robin - netmask ordering confusion

I went through a crisis not long after splitting my Win2003 AD network into two VLANs, crisis documented at http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2361165
In a nutshell, Windows DNS uses netmask ordering to resolve the "best" IP address to client queries based on their IP address. If a given host (on LAN) has more than one IP address on different VLAN/subnets, a query to a DNS server should give both IP answers, though only the one on the same subnet as the client is often accessible to that client. Thus, netmask ordering adds some intelligence to that process, overriding round-robin, and it works pretty well.
Enter OS X Server using BIND, and set up a secondary zone to a Windows primary, and that all goes out the window. It seems OS X Server uses Round Robin by default. Though BIND is supposed to have similar functionality to Windows server's netmask ordering in a function called "sortlist," I can't figure out how to use that in OS X Server.
Anyone ever mess with that?

Camelot wrote:
I'm not entirely sure I understand what you're asking. There is no concept in DNS of subnets - a host record maps to a network address (and vice versa), and subnets don't come into play.
Unless what you're referring to is the ability of the name server to offer different replies based on the client's IP address…?
If so, that is possible in BIND, via views, but there is no GUI support for multiple views in Server Admin (all zones exist in a single view served to all clients).
If you want to offer different results to clients based on their address you'll need to implement a secondary view containing the zone data that should be visible to those clients. You'll also lose the ability to manage your DNS via the GUI. It's not that hard to do, but it does mean you'll typically be working in the shell to maintain your zone files.
My nutshell approach was not clear, but you got the gist. But there is a concept of subnets implemented in Window server. I split our school network into two VLANs for security (keep students from even seeing admin servers) but needed to keep domain in Active Directory and our Windows servers. Thus, the domain controllers are multi-homed. School admin subnet is 172.16/16, student subnet is 172.20/16. Without netmask ordering or round robin enabled, Mac clients requesting internal DNS resolution would always get the 172.16.x.x address of the domain controllers, so they could not authenticate to the domain (the AD plugin apparently can only use the first IP returned in a query, it won't try others if unsuccessful). Netmask ordering enabled the DNS server to look at the IP of the DNS client and reply to queries with the IP which is in the client subnet first, then additional IPs, if any. The next bump I hit was that netmask ordering assumes a Class C subnet, not very well-documented, but a simple command fixed that, and it's worked excellent ever since-- until I tried designating a Mac server as a secondary and set some Mac clients to point to the Mac server for DNS resolution. They then get round-robin replies, so the ADplugin, which must make several DNS queries, gets confused. Research led me to sortlist, but whether it's that or "views" as you suggest, it's probably not something I want to jump into. I am going to give up on my Magic Triangle dreams and convert student and teachers to Open Directory over the summer, just create a new domain.
P.S. technically, MS discourages having DCs multi-homed, but not having anything layer 3 to route between my new VLANs, it was my only option. In addition, the administrative file server I needed to keep away from student hacking is also the main Domain Controller (PDC emulator master), so adding routes to make the DC work across subnets would have defeated the security purpose. It's a smaller private school, limited resources. Thx.

Similar Messages

  • Isdn bchan-number-order ascending round-robin is applied but not working

    isdn bchan-number-order ascending round-robin is applied but not working
    ios c3825-spservicesk9-mz.124-21.bin
    relevant config
    controller E1 0/3/0
     framing NO-CRC4
     pri-group timeslots 1-31
    interface Serial0/3/0:15
     no ip address
     encapsulation hdlc
     no logging event link-status
     no snmp trap link-status
     isdn switch-type primary-net5
     isdn overlap-receiving
     isdn incoming-voice voice
     isdn bchan-number-order ascending round-robin
     trunk-group 1
     no cdp enable
    my problem is this:-
    At the moment calls are leaving on the first available channel of my h323 voice gateway PRI, I can apply this command to the interface fine but it makes no difference the b cannels are always being picked on a first come  first served basis . I have also tried combination "isdn bchan-number-order decending" and "isdn bchan-number-order descending round-robin" but it makes no difference , the first b channel is always selected .
    Any ideas , if you think its a bug can u identify the bug id as I cannot find it .

    Hello
     I can see that you use ascending , that why you hit 1st channel.You have to choose one of these commands ascending or descending
    I have a question here , for your incoming calls which channel hits ?.FYI isdn bchan-number-order descending is enable by default , so if you need to change you have to type ascending. Can you just share incoming calls which channel hits?.This is because before you define your outgoing calls , you have to check your service provider channel used, and this to avoid error channel is not available.
    Command
    Router(config-if)# isdn bchan-number-order {ascending | descending}
    Purpose
    Enables B channel selection for outgoing calls on a PRI interface (optional).
    Thanks
    please rate all useful information

  • NLS Redundancy using DNS Round Robin

    Hello, I have searched the internet and this forum for my question but I couldn't find the answer anywhere.
    Would it be an option to use DNS Round Robin as a 'fail over' mechanism for the DA NLS Server?
    To explain our situation a little: We have a few branch offices and it happens sometimes that the site-to-site VPN tunnel between the branch office and the main office breaks (e.g. internet outage in the main office). In those situations it would be best to
    have a NLS server in another office to prevent users from losing conenctivity to the network because of the first NLS server being unreachable (we have a full-mesh network between the offices).
    But how does the DA mechanism respond to a DNS result with multiple IP addresses when querying for the NLS server? Most browsers will go to the 2nd IP address in case the 1st IP address is unreachable in such a situation. Will DirectAccess also do this?
    I hope I explained our situation and question OK.

    Jason,
    I may have found something else. Apparently netmask ordering uses a default subnet mask of /24 (255.255.255.0) This is why the subnet must match. Apparently you can change the netmask used by netmask ordering:
    Description of the netmask ordering feature and the round robin feature in Windows Server 2003 DNS
    http://support2.microsoft.com/kb/842197
    Not every customer may use this solution, but it might provide an solution for some customers. It all depends on their address scheme. Allow me to explain...
    Imagine you have one datacenter and three branch offices. Each branch office owns a /16 subnet:
    - Datacenter (10.100.0.0/16)
    - Branch Office 1 (10.110.0.0/16)
    - Branch Office 2 (10.120.0.0/16)
    - Branch Office 3 (10.130.0.0/16)
    Of course the whole /16 sunnet is not used on a site, intead multiple VLAN's with a /24 subnet are used at each site. A VLAN for servers and clients.
    Now imagine you have an NLS in each server VLAN at each site. You configure RR for those NLS. If you query from a server next to an NLS, that NLS will be on top of the DNS query result. if you query from a client in another VLAN, the client will get
    random DNS results because the client has another network ID. This is because the default netmask used by netmask ordering is 255.255.255.0 (/24).
    If you change the netmask used by netmask ordering to 255.255.0.0 (/16) that will give you the nearest NLS on top.
    But not every customer uses a /16 subnet for each site. So, that's why it won't be usable for everybody.
    Ok, it is not an Enterprise solution and does not get the nobel prize, but what do you think?
    Boudewijn Plomp | BPMi Infrastructure & Security
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote as Helpful", and if it answered your question, please click "Mark as Answer".
    Ah, ok...sorry I assumed you knew that! Normally NMO needs to be 'tuned' to match the branch office subnets to get the expected/best results. That KB is pretty invaluable to setup it up properly. Like you say it does depend on customer having logical/consistent
    subnet boundaries definitions for it to work effectively though. I never said NMO was perfect :)
    Jason Jones | Security Consultant | Microsoft Consultant Services (MCS)

  • Does AD site affect netmask ordering?

    I may have made an incorrect assumption when creating my RDS farm.
    I've split the servers over two sites, and enabled netmask ordering. This seems to work well for the most part however there are multiple subnets available on each site. I made the assumption that netmask ordering weights:
    1. Similarity of IP
    2. Membership to that AD site
    Looks to me that is not correct?
    For instance the RDS Farm1 is on the 192.168.10.x subnet on Site1 in AD. All clients on 192.168.10.x connect to this farm fine however 192.168.3.x is also at this site, it seems to just round robin across both of the farms.
    So first question, is it correct to say that AD site is irrelevant in netmask ordering? 
    Second question, does anyone have any advice on making this work how I expect it to?  Would adding a secondary IP on each RDS server (on the 192.168.3.x) do what I was mistakenly expecting it to do?

    Hi,
    Based from the output of the subnets information for both sites, it is impossible to achieve your goal through netmask ordering.
    However, I suggest you configure host files on clients to locate appropriate Domain Controllers directly. You can use Group Policy Preference or startup script to configure host file contents, then apply them onto clients.
    More information for you:
    Files Extension
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771102.aspx
    Assign computer startup scripts
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc779329(v=ws.10).aspx
    Best Regards,
    Amy
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • Round robin DNS for load balancing between multiple network adapters (Xserve)

    I'm attempting to use 'round robin' DNS to load balance between the two ethernet adapters of an Xserve.
    Both ethernet adapters are connected to the same LAN and have static IP addresses of 192.168.2.250 and 192.168.2.251.
    The DNS zone for the server's local domain/host (macserver.private) has a machine record with both IP addresses (set up in the Lion Server UI).
    Having read up on round robin DNS, I would have expected DNS requests for 'macserver.private' to be answered with the two IP addresses ordered at random, achiving my aim of requests being served at random via each ethernet adapter.
    However this doesn't seem to be the case. Doing a 'nslookup' from any of the network clients results in the two IP addresses being listed in the same order everytime. And pinging 'macserver.private' only ever results in a response from the same address.
    Does anyone know why this is the case? Does Lion Server use a non-standard DNS configuration? Are there any additional settings I need to configure in Lion's DNS server to make adopt a round robin approach to responding to requests?
    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Be careful what you wish for
    Round Robin DNS is rarely the best option for 'load balancing'. At the very least it's subject to caching at various point on the network - even at the client side, once the client looks up the address it will cache that response - this means that subsequent lookups may be served from the client's cache and not refer back to the server. Therfore any given client will always see the same address until the cache expires.
    I suspect this is what you're seeing.
    You can minimize this by setting a lower TTL on the records. This should result in the response being cached for a shorter period, meaning the client will make more requests to the server, with a higher change of using the 'other' address.
    However, you're also going to run into issues with the server having two interfaces/addresses in the same LAN. This isn't recommended.
    As Jonathon mentioned, you may be better off just bonding the two interfaces. This will provide an automatic level of dynamic load balancing without the latency of DNS caches, as well as automatic failover should one link fail (as opposed to round robin DNS which will cause 50% of requests to fail until the client cache expires and a new lookup is performed (and, even then, there's still a chance the client will try to use the failed link).

  • OBIEE 11g Multiple instance hitting Presentation catalog in round robin fashion

    Hi All,
    Our requirement was to have two instances of OBIEE 11g in a single box ie one for Dev and one for TEST
    For OBIEE 10g, i see lot of information, but for OBIEE 11g i dont see any information on this..
    Has anyone tried implementing multiple instances in OBIEE 11g through vertical clustering.?
    so far i did vertical clustering of Presentation servers
    ie
    1 BI Server
    2 Presentation Servers
    2 Presentation Services Plug-in ( analytics.ear, analytics2.ear)
    The issue that i am facing is that the below analytics link sometimes hits one catalog and sometimes other catalog... ( its random hitting) [looks like Load balancer is acting here]
    http://constance.localhost.com:9704/analytics 
    Also i read on Rittman Blog that ..
    "Presentation Services plug-in and Presentation Services have been decoupled. So, essentially a single web server can communicate to multiple presentation services in a round-robin fashion without the need for load balancer in vertical clustering. In horizontal clustering with multiple machines, load balancer will be required though in order to switch between different HTTP servers based on the incoming load. "
    Any ideas how to switch off the load balancer?
    Thanks
    Ashish

  • CSM : Strange Round-Robin behaviour

    Hi,
    During validation tests, I am observing a strange server selection behaviour, on independent GET requests (no cookie included) : When a connection request arrives in the CSM within a time window of about 20 seconds after the previous request, then the CSM correctly selects the next real server in the farm (round-robin). However, if the second connection arrives more than 20 sec after the previous request, the CSM selects the same server as for the previous one. Everything looks like the round-robin algorithm would be "reset" after this periood of time.
    Is it a normal behaviour ?
    By the way, how is the server list organized in the CSM RR algorithm ?
    Thank you
    Yves Haemmerli

    Gilles,
    As you requested, I send you the traces showing that when sessions are established with long delay between them, the round-robin load balancing is not consistent.
    Here are some important infos :
    - Client IP address is 141.122.142.197
    - VIP address is 160.213.139.14
    - We NAT the client with the VIP address
    - Servers addresses are :
    -> 160.213.139.163
    -> 160.213.139.164
    -> 160.213.139.165
    -> 160.213.139.166
    -> 160.213.139.171
    -> 160.213.139.172
    -> 160.213.139.173
    -> 160.213.139.174
    I ran two tests. Fore each of them I send you one trace showing the frames (HTTP on TCP port 26000)between the client and the CSM, and a second trace showing the frames between the CSM and the servers. In the trace, please forget about the HTTP code 401 returned by the servers). Also, note that the sessions are kept open by my session generator, in order to do the test.
    In the first test, I sent 16 sessions in the raw without delay between them. Load balancing is perfect, each of the eight servers receives 2 sessions.
    Than, I sent 16 sessions, one after the other, with several seconds between them. As you can see, the load balancing is uneven in this case.
    I can't understand the behaviour as the GET requests in both tests are exactly the same...
    Thank you for your help,
    Yves Haemmerli

  • ACE howto: ¿Classic round-robin if cookie not present?

    Hello team:
    My server farm behind the ACE will be used for applications that may or may not send cookies.
    So I have been asked to configure the ACE to be aware of a certain cookie in order to stick client to server as expected. In paralell, I have also been asked to execute a classic round robin algorithm if no cookie is present on the HTTP sessions.
    Then my question is: ¿ will my ACE, configured with the "sticky http-cookie ..." command, default to a classical round-robin algorithm if no cookie is detected in the HTTP request from the client?
    Your hints will be greatly appreciated.
    Best regards, Rogelio

    Rogelio,
    */ Create a http parameter-map, if you did not do so already:
    parameter-map type http HTTP
      case-insensitive
      persistence-rebalance
      set header-maxparse-length 65535
      set content-maxparse-length 65535
      length-exceed continue
    */ Match the cookie, and whatever value PHP created:
    class-map type http loadbalance match-any PHPSESSID
      2 match http cookie PHPSESSID cookie-value ".*"
    */ Create a policy map, add the PHPSESSID class-map, and assign the sticky serverfarm.
    */ Assign your real servers to the default class (class-default)
    policy-map type loadbalance http first-match STICKY_SLB_LOGIC
    class PHPSESSID
      sticky-serverfarm STICKY_SERVERS
    class class-default
      serverfarm REAL_SERVERS
    */ Add it to the service policy
    policy-map multi-match CLIENT_VIPS
      class VIP-30
        loadbalance vip inservice
        loadbalance policy STICKY_SLB_LOGIC
        loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
        appl-parameter http advanced-options HTTP
    Cheers mate,
    Søren Elleby Sørensen

  • Exchange 2013 and DNS Round Robin downside?

    Hi guys,
    I have a question regarding Exchange Server 2013 (SP1) and the use of DNS round robin.
    I have a customer that currently is running 2 CAS servers with NLB and we are currently investigating if it would be appropriate to move to a DNS RR solution so we can remove the CAS servers and install the CAS role on the Mailbox servers.
    (yes I know that CAS with NLB and Mbx with DAG cannot be used on the same server)
    What would be the downside of DNS RR?
    Request 1 will go to first MBX server, Reqeust 2 to second MBX server, Request 3 to third MBX server and then start over again. If MBX server 1 goes offline, it will still be used within the DNS RR solution and clients will be redirected towards that server.
    But how will clients react? Will Outlook 2010/2013 timeout since the server is not responding and do a autodiscover lookup again and then hopefully jump on the DNS that points towards another server?
    Is this true for pop/imap or a receive connector for SMTP relay aswell?

    Hi Fredrik,
    Hope this helps  out...
    Round robin doens't check the load on the network interfaces.It just passes on to the next one; for example Server1, Server2
    If server1 has a lot of traffic on his nic he still get more traffic onto his nic when round robin wants to.
    NLB gives some checkes on the load on the interfaces. Therefore it will make sure that that all servers has about the same amount of traffic.
    In Windows NLB we can able to create port rules for the virtual ip which is not applicable when you go DNS Round Robin
    DNS round robin the clients will see different IP addresses Wherea NLB uses single IP Address
    DNS round robin is not a good solution for redundancy. If one of the nodes goes down, you first have to go and remove its A record from the DNS server but then it may take some time before such a change is propergated. In the meantime you may have a number
    of clients attempt to access the dead IP.
    With load balancing you can remove a host from the set immediately (if it doesn't detect an unresponsive host automatically). The only affect of a downed server on the clients would be if some of the clients had session
    data on that server.
    Exchange Queries

  • Command Tilde round robins between windows of an application but does not work in Most Recently Used mode

    Hi All,
    Suppose I have 5 excel sheets open and I want to toggle between 2 excel sheets on which i'm working on currently. How do it do it in Mac ? Cmd-~ round robins between all the open excels. Alt-Tab in windows work on the Most Recently Used concept. Is there a way to achieve this in Mac ?
    Regards,
    Avinash

    Not a reply to this specific question, just a quasi-relevant comment that might help some folks.
    In Leopard, and with (for example) English and Russian chosen in System Prefs under "Language" and the keyboard shortcut set to command+space, I would always see the flag change in the menu bar as soon as command+space were chosen. Now, under Snow Leopard, hitting command+space seems not to make the change. But it does make the change, you just need to take your fingers off the keys first, then the flag will change.

  • Round Robin was not happening for my cluster with WebLogic Proxy Plugin

              Hi,
              I configured my cluster with software load balancer, HTTPClusterServlet. By default,
              it is load balancing with Round Robin Algorithm. That means one HTTP request
              goes to server1, and the other HTTP request goes to server2. However, it is not
              what I can see no matter for the requests in one HTTP session or not.
              Say I open two browser, and log into my application with two different users,
              one is "cyang", the other is "xpression". Then the HTTP request (for servlet/jsp)
              from two browsers always go to the same server1, server2 is not invoked at all.
              I did see one time, with only one session (one browser with "xPression" user log
              in), the most requests go to server1, suddenly I am brough into log in page, then
              I noticed that the request for "xPression" moved to server2 although server1 is
              still alive. Therefore, at most, I can say it is "Random", rather than "Round
              Robin".
              What is the real meaning for HTTP servlet/jsp load balancing algorithm? Does
              Round Robin mean request go to each server in turns? Does it have to be different
              session or it can be within one session?
              

    It should be sticky. If not, then bug / config error.
              Peace,
              Cameron Purdy
              Tangosol, Inc.
              http://www.tangosol.com/coherence.jsp
              Tangosol Coherence: Clustered Replicated Cache for Weblogic
              "Carole Yang" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              news:[email protected]...
              >
              > Thanks. Yeh, with two kind of browsers, I do see the request goes to
              different
              > servers.
              >
              > That goes back to the original question. Does "Round Robin" here fall
              into the
              > scope of a HTTP session. However, that is not always true for my tests.
              Sometimes,
              > HTTP request just randomly goes to another server while in the same HTTP
              session.
              > It is not sticky to one particular server during one session.
              >
              >
              >
              > --Carole
              >
              >
              > "Cameron Purdy" <[email protected]> wrote:
              > >Has to be different sessions to go to different machines.
              > >
              > >Best way to test is to run one session in IE and the other in Mozilla
              > >or
              > >Netscape.
              > >
              > >Peace,
              > >
              > >Cameron Purdy
              > >Tangosol, Inc.
              > >http://www.tangosol.com/coherence.jsp
              > >Tangosol Coherence: Clustered Replicated Cache for Weblogic
              > >
              > >
              > >"Carole Yang" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              > >news:[email protected]...
              > >>
              > >> Hi,
              > >>
              > >> I configured my cluster with software load balancer,
              HTTPClusterServlet.
              > >By default,
              > >> it is load balancing with Round Robin Algorithm. That means one HTTP
              > >request
              > >> goes to server1, and the other HTTP request goes to server2. However,
              > >it
              > >is not
              > >> what I can see no matter for the requests in one HTTP session or not.
              > >>
              > >> Say I open two browser, and log into my application with two different
              > >users,
              > >> one is "cyang", the other is "xpression". Then the HTTP request (for
              > >servlet/jsp)
              > >> from two browsers always go to the same server1, server2 is not invoked
              > >at
              > >all.
              > >>
              > >> I did see one time, with only one session (one browser with "xPression"
              > >user log
              > >> in), the most requests go to server1, suddenly I am brough into log
              > >in
              > >page, then
              > >> I noticed that the request for "xPression" moved to server2 although
              > >server1 is
              > >> still alive. Therefore, at most, I can say it is "Random", rather
              > >than
              > >"Round
              > >> Robin".
              > >>
              > >> What is the real meaning for HTTP servlet/jsp load balancing algorithm?
              > >Does
              > >> Round Robin mean request go to each server in turns? Does it have
              > >to be
              > >different
              > >> session or it can be within one session?
              > >
              > >
              >
              

  • Web Services Round Robin Service Load Balancer Event Endpoint Failure

    I keep seeing these errors in the UlsTraceLogs:
    SharePoint Web Services Round Robin Service Load Balancer Event: EndpointFailure Process Name: OWSTIMER Process ID: 3748 AppDomain Name: DefaultDomain AppDomain ID: 1 Service Application Uri: urn:schemas-microsoft-com:sharepoint:service:9b3095eda69947b299d2f873bbfee5ad#authority=urn:uuid:a01381a61b244525ab4fec30cde9dc5f&authority=https://ApplicationServerName:port/Topology/topology.svc
    Active Endpoints: 2 Failed Endpoints:1 Affected Endpoint:
    http://WFEserverName:port/9b3095eda69947b299d2f873bbfee5ad/ProfileService.svc
    what do these errors mean?

    ok, thanks, I'll have a look at that.
    Going back to my issue...  Since I stopped the User Profile Service on the Application server, now I'm getting these non-stop messages in the log:
    SharePoint Web Services Round Robin Service Load Balancer Event: EndpointFailure Process Name: w3wp Process ID: 6088 AppDomain Name: /LM/W3SVC/261708640/ROOT-1-130709594108226406 AppDomain ID: 2 Service Application Uri: urn:schemas-microsoft-com:sharepoint:service:9b3095eda69947b299d2f873bbfee5ad#authority=urn:uuid:a01381a61b244525ab4fec30cde9dc5f&authority=https://ApplicationServerName:port/Topology/topology.svc
    Active Endpoints: 2 Failed Endpoints:1 Affected Endpoint:
    http://ApplicationServerName:port/9b3095eda69947b299d2f873bbfee5ad/ProfileService.svc
    SharePoint Web Services Round Robin Service Load Balancer Event: EndpointFailure Process Name: OWSTIMER Process ID: 8304 AppDomain Name: DefaultDomain AppDomain ID: 1 Service Application Uri: urn:schemas-microsoft-com:sharepoint:service:9b3095eda69947b299d2f873bbfee5ad#authority=urn:uuid:a01381a61b244525ab4fec30cde9dc5f&authority=https://ApplicationServerName:port/Topology/topology.svc
    Active Endpoints: 2 Failed Endpoints:1 Affected Endpoint:
    http://ApplicationServerName:port/9b3095eda69947b299d2f873bbfee5ad/ProfileService.svc
    This time, the messages are referring to the same server - the Application Server.    In my original question, I should've differentiated the server names when I pasted the message.  Originally the message was referring to the Application
    Server and Affected Endpoint was referring to a WFE.   I'll edit my original post to make it correct.

  • Load Balancing With Round Robin

    Hi,
    I have two iAS instances, each on their own box, and one iWS instance
    running on a third box. I have setup the web connector to use round
    robin and added the server weights. I believe that is all that is to it
    to do simple load balancing with iAS. The problem is is that the
    requests only go to one iAS instance. The server weights are 1 and 1.
    Am I missing something here?
    Thanks

    Could be lots of things.
    The most common misconfiguration is testing an application that is deployed "local". This application option effectively disables load balancing.
    Another common mistake is to either not update the configuration of the webconnector (if the webconnector
    has a seperate configuration LDAP) or to not restart
    the webconnector after the configuration change.
    Hope this helps. There's more things we could try, but I'll hope its one of these two easy things.

  • WAN round-robin load balancing

    First things first, I just recently got that horrible distribution Gentoo off my machine and installed Arch for a test run and so far a flipping love it. Just like to thank everyone that made this wonderful piece of Linux.
    To the point: I have a box with 3 NIC and it current runs as my LAN gateway. http://pastie.org/608016 is the script I use to do so and as you may have guessed eth0 is my DSL modem eth1 is my LAN switch, eth2 is my cable modem. Currently my LAN runs off just my DSL, if I want to change this and run off the cable I have to change WAN in the script to eth2 and run it. I would like to change this and have it round-robin load balance over my DSL, cable.
    I tried
    ifconfig eth0 down
    ifconfig eth2 down
    modprobe bonding mode=0 miimon=100
    ifconfig bond0 10.0.0.5
    ifenslave bond0 eth0
    ifenslave bond0 eth2
    inspired by http://ubuntulinuxhelp.com/how-to-use-t … -computer/ and that didn't work at all.
    Then I had a look at http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Con … rk#bonding (two ip on two card) but that didn't really make sense to be as you're not specifying what interfaces to bond anywhere.
    Could anyone help me?

    Let us first set some symbolical names. Let $IF1 be the name of the first interface (if1 in the picture above) and $IF2 the name of the second interface. Then let $IP1 be the IP address associated with $IF1 and $IP2 the IP address associated with $IF2. Next, let $P1 be the IP address of the gateway at Provider 1, and $P2 the IP address of the gateway at provider 2. Finally, let $P1_NET be the IP network $P1 is in, and $P2_NET the IP network $P2 is in.
    One creates two additional routing tables, say T1 and T2. These are added in /etc/iproute2/rt_tables. Then you set up routing in these tables as follows:
    ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 src $IP1 table T1
    ip route add default via $P1 table T1
    ip route add $P2_NET dev $IF2 src $IP2 table T2
    ip route add default via $P2 table T2
    What does it mean by 'IP network' ($P*_NET)?

  • Does anybody know any software for the Mac that I can run round robin, single and double elimination tournaments?

    Does anybody know any software for the Mac that I can run round robin, single and double elimination tournaments?  I help run tournaments but using excel for pool play and the web for bracket play, but if wifi is not available I have no way of running brackets for prize play.  Can some one help point me in the direction of software that I can use locally on my Mac Pro. 
    Thanks,
    Chris
    <E-mail Edited by Host>

    Splendid City Team Sports Scheduler, and Sports Scheduling Software System

Maybe you are looking for