Source IP Address Access Rule Not Working

I'm trying to create and access rule that denies certain source IP addresses
from making SMTP connections to my email server. I create the access rule
and put it at the top of the list but the connections are still happening.
It's a deny rule to block Port, Service: SMTP, Origin Server Port 25, TCP &
UDP, Specified 'ip addresses', Destination 'any'. Granted I have my email
NATed through a secondary IP address to the email server. Any ideas why this
isn't working? Thanks.

It's a GWIA.
>>> On 11/22/2006 at 11:27 AM, in message
<bw19h.1043$[email protected]>, Jim
Michael<[email protected]> wrote:
> Adrian van Ravesteyn wrote:
>> OK, that makes sense. Is there a way I can limit access for certain ip
>> addresses on this NATed interface?
>
> Giving access to "all but a few" is a problem, but limiting access to
> "all but a few" is relatively easy (you just create the exceptions you
> need, with the allowed source IPs). You're better off blocking specific
> IPs at your SMTP server. Is your mail server a GroupWise GWIA, or
> something else?

Similar Messages

Alternate Access Mapping not working for Zone : Intranet

One of our client want to set Alternate Access Mappint (intranet) with url "intranet.theirDomain.com" with local IP address.
is it possible?
subsequest to my previous question (
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/3f39711e-301a-40e8-aa7a-855fa2c268b1/alternate-access-mapping-not-working?forum=sharepointadmin )
I want to ask one more question
Can we configure "intranet.theirDomain.com" with local IP address for any other zone?
or
If there is ".com" within the url then it can't be configured for InTRAnet?
Thanks
S H A J A N

The names for the zones don't matter. You could use the 'extranet' zone for another intranet name if you wanted, the names are just to make it a bit more friendly for beginners.
What you describe sounds routine, you create a web application with a name, then use an AAM to allow users to access it with a more friendly name. Frequently you end up creating
http://intranet.domain.com and
http://intranet as an AAM, or vice versa.
You can use .com for an intranet site, you would need to add the site as an A Host record in your DNS server so that traffic is sent to your internal server rather than out into the wider world.

Infopath form load rule not working in browser forms but works on Client

Hi
I am working on an Infopath form and there are rules on form load. The form load checks for a value in a list, if the username() matches the one in the list, then the form would change its view.
It works when I open it on client, but on the browser it fails.
Have anyone encountered such an issue.

Check below:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16222681/infopath-rule-is-not-running-when-checking-sharepoint-list-field-value
Ensure that "Include data for the active form only" was checked (I had to separate this field into another data connection because that box could not be checked for another field I was using), and
Ensure that in the rule I was selecting from the "dataFields" folder under the data connection instead of "queryFields"
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/28554/infopath-form-load-rules-not-working
if I edit the Infopath form on Infopath 2007, it seems that the rules for the load form will be visible if created.
This look like a bug. Here are the steps below that will lead you to the bug:
Step 1: Open the infopath form in Infopath 2010 and create 6 rules for Form Load and Save it as a file.
Step 2: Open that infopath form that you created in Step 1 in InfoPath 2010 and go to the
Form Load section. You will only see the first 5 rules. The 6th rules that you created for Step 1 will just "vanish". Now, close that infopath form.
Step 3: Open that infopath form that you created in step 1 in InfoPath 2007 and select Tools > Form Option. In the
Open and Save category, click the Rules button and add a new rule in it and save it.
Step 4: Open that infopath form that you modify as describe in Step 3 in InfoPath 2010. That 6th rule will be visible.
Therefore, there might be a bug in InfoPath 2010 that restrict Rules to a max of 5 in Form Load and thus if anyone open that form in SharePoint, only the first 5 rules will be executed.
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

Address Book is Not Working

Suddenly Address Book is not working. I can type addresses into Mail, but if I try to click on names directly from Address Book, nothing happens. It has been working fine until today. Contacts is fine; all addresses are there, but I wanted to enter several people from Address Book and nothing prints. How can I fix it? I have an Imac with Mountain Lion.

It is a Maverick bug and there is a lot of discussion on it in the Mavericks section.

Defaulting Rules Not Working for Repair Orders in OM?

Hi,
Defaulting Rules have been setup for return line & standard line based on few conditions and it is working fine if we create a sales order directly from OM (Manual SO)?
But in our project we are using Depot Repair(Repair Orders), we tried to create a service request and then converted to a sales order here defaulting rules not working for repair orders?
Please help me to solve this issue ASAP.
Thanks,
Kishor

Hi,
You have like this:
1. Price list
2.OE_DEFAULT_PVT.Get_SOB_Currency_Code
You have to make
1. XXOE_DEFAULT_PVT.custom_code
2. Price list
3.OE_DEFAULT_PVT.Get_SOB_Currency_Code
Did you made own custom code to pick currency?
Regards,
Luko

Remote access vpn not working, VPNC client

Hi,
I have configured a remote access vpn client on cisco ASA 5520 with the following configuration. we are using cisco vpn client.
tunnel-group consultant type remote-access
tunnel-group consultant general-attributes
address-pool VPN
authentication-server-group RSA-AAA LOCAL
default-group-policy consultant
tunnel-group consultant ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *
group-policy consultant internal
group-policy consultant attributes
vpn-idle-timeout 120
vpn-session-timeout 720
vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value access-spilt
access-list access-spilt standard permit host 10.101.50.60
One of the linux users is using vpnc and once the user connects to the vpn and the user adds a static route on the machine with the destination pointing to the vpn interface, for example 10.101.50.0/24, user is able to reach all the hosts in the subnet even though the access list on the firewall is configured for one host 10.101.50.60.
I did the same test on a windows machine, but was only able to reach the specific host allowed through vpn. why is the network filter not working for vpnc. please advise.
Thanks

Hi have solved the issue . enabling the demo 3DES & AES now my VPN is connecting
https://tools.cisco.com/SWIFT/LicensingUI/loadDemoLicensee?FormId=139
thx to friend "Jennifer Halim"

Adding Faces to Address Book Contacts-Not working!

I tried adding some faces to my Address book's contacts, but the "Face" icon, that is supposed to link you to your iPhoto Library does not work. It is dimmed.
And choosing my iPhoto Library instead, in hopes of being able to access my photos with faces, does not get around this problem.
Anyone know of a fix?
Thanks.

I placed this question up here almost two years ago, and the problem has since resolved itself. I think because I have upgraded my mac's operating system (OS) several times since then.
You might want to check and see if you're using the latest version of Mac OS X (currently 10.8.4). If you're not up-to-date, go into the App Store on your Mac and see if there is an OS update waiting for you. That might help.
Good luck.

Alternative Access Mapping not working "You're not connected to a network"

Hi *,
i want to set up alternate access mapping in my sharepoint 2013 development environment.
My SharePoint is reachable through http://sp2013.
I created a second web application with listens on port 8080. When i open http://sp2013:8080 everything works fine and i can see my root site collection.
Next i added through "Add internal Urls" a new url -> http://sp2013test to the default zone.
Next i edited the bindings in the iss application for this web application and added http://sp2013test listening to port 80:
But i does not work! I get the message "You’re not connected to a network" from the ie.
I dont want have to call my WebApps through ports. I want to have WebApplication which i can call through clear names like http://customerWebApp1, http://customer2WebApp. All via Port 80.
Whats wrong here?
Best Regards
Bog
Developers Field Notes | www.bog1.de

Hi Bob,
For you issue, try to map web application URLs to the local loopback address. For that you need to update host file at the path:(C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts)
Here is a link about Setup Multiple SharePoint Web Applications on Port 80 with Https Binding on Port 443, you can use as a reference:
http://onlinecoder.blogspot.com/2012/10/setup-multiple-sharepoint-web.html
Best Regards
Lisa Chen

Alternate Access Mapping not working

I am trying to configure alternate access mapping in sp2013.
My default url for site is https://intranet
My client has given a url https://intranet.theirDomain.com
When I ping "intranet.theirDomain.com" on their local machine it is returning IP: 192.168.0.87
When I ping "intranet", it is giving IP: 192.168.0.86
I have edited the Public Zone URL as follows
Default: https://intranet
Intranet: https://intranet.theirDomain.com
In IIS the following bindings are there.
https intranet 443 *
https intranet.theirDomain.com 443 *
But still https://intranet.theirDomain.com is not working
https://intranet is working.
I hope all are configured correctly.
Or doing any wrong? please guide me.
S H A J A N

It sounds like the 'intranet' A record in the theirDomain.com zone isn't pointed at the correct IP address (192.168.0.86).
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Field links in Address Book do not work

"A left click in the field of Address Book opens a contextual menu" does not work. All the fields in my Address Book are light gray, and however I click do, not yield any menu. I know they did a while ago, but did not record with what update this feature became disabled. Any explanation and solution? Thank you!

Hi Ludwig,
Thank you for letting us know about the issue with the links in the document. We will work to fix it.
I believe the document you are referring to is called "SAP Discovery Demonstration Access" which can be found at the bottom of the How To Set Up your Discovery System page and not the "Quick Guide", as the "Quick Guide" doesn't contain any links to demos/scenarios.
In the mean time please go to the Out Of The Box Demonstrations section on the website, you will see there the links to all the demos:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/webcontent/uuid/5f3caa50-0e01-0010-73b2-ceb94c05e8a1 [original link is broken]
Regards,
Itai

Delete rule not working

I subscribe to a mailing list using a particular email address (not my primary account), all mail for which is redirected into a mailbox. I only want to keep messages from the last five days. I have a Rule which is set as follows:
If ALL of the following conditions are met:
Account = <the account>
Date Received is Greater Than 5 days old
Perform the following actions:
Delete Message
This rule does does not work. It is the first rule in my list of Rules. And it simply does nothing. Why?

Maxplanar,
Mail rules only run when the item is first processed. So you are in effect going to delete things only when they are received in an "old" state.
I would set up a smart mailbox or two. One to only show the 5 days of mail you want to pay attention to. Optionally make another smart mailbox to contain messages older than 5 days. You can just refer to the first mailbox and only see the messages you want. The other mailbox will be there for once a month when you select all the messages and delete them.
Most macs can handle 5 to 10 thousand messages without even starting to slow down. Perhaps once you have a managable folder that shows you the messages you care to see, you can live with manually cleaning up much less often?

Derivation Rules Not Working for other company codes

Hi,
I have 5 Company codes and only for one FM was activated. now i want to activate FM for all 5 company codes. for which i have assigned the FM area to all 5 company codes. I have also assigned the derivation strategy to all 5 company codes as well. now when i post a transaction for any other company code derivation rules is not being process hence no commitment item or fund center is derived. however for the original company code for which FM was activated in the first derivation rule are working fine means system is deriving commitment item and fund center. can any one tell me why derivation rules are not working for other company codes? do i have to add Company code in source field of derivation strategy? could this be the reason? because in beginning there was no other company code so we did not included any company code field in the first place.
Regards,

Faizan,
Go to Funds Management Government> Actual and Commitment Update/Integration> Activate/Deactivate Funds Management.
In the screen create an entry for each Company Code and Funds Management Area combination.
Activate the AA Derivtn flag if you want the derivation to be called and the Update flag if you want to update commitments and actuals in FM.
Thanks
Shyam

Copa derivation rule not working for Discount GL

Hi All,
Kindly note that I have a distribution rule where company & plant combination is used where condtion is that customer group 3 should be 018 and then replace distribution channel to 03.However the rule is not working for discount GL posted in the billing document.
I tried testing it in FB50 but then it does not allows me to enter plant and because of that derivation rule fails. However in my billing doc I do see a plant against discount GL and still the rule is not getting picked.
I had raised this issue earlier but the reply where not as expected and so I have rephraised my question.
Kindly help me on this.
Regards
Pranay

Hi Pranay
I could not understand your req to a great detail, following are my observations
1. There should be derivation rule in place 1st of all to derive customer group from billing doc...
Check if Cust Group is populated in your COPA doc or not.. For this cust group should be a segment level char in KEQ3
2. Create a derivation rule using method "Derivation".
Source fields would be Cust Group, Plant and Company code ( I guess you want to change dist channel with this combination)
Target field would be VTWEG (Dist Channel)....Click on the magnifying lens beside VTWEG and choose relevant radio button "Overwrite if ......."
CLick on RULE VALUES and maintain the required Values there
This should work...
Regards
Ajay M

Role membership rule not working

Hi guys,
When I create a role and assign 'membership rule' to it, the members are shown in preview screen.
But they are not show up in members screen of that role.
My environment is 11gR2 SP1.
It is working nicely in 11gR2 base. But from some bundle pack and after, it is not working.
1. is it right?
2. if then, why is it changed?
3. and how shoul I assign members to role?
(as a workaround I modified the memner arrtibute. => not working
and restart OIM, => still not working
and reboot the server.> still not working...)
can anyone help this?
regards,
dongsu

J,
It has been a critical issue in real customer project this year.
Certainly we informed it to local oracle team and they says it is intentional change and we have to accept it.
(means create role first and read in users by trusted recon from source again.. bra bra..)
But I do not get any documented information about it.
Actually in BP4 (may be..) if I change any attribute value of that user who supposed to belongs to that role, then it works.
But in BP7 and now in PS1, even that approach do not working.

Mac Mail rules not working

Rules in Mac Mail are working terribly randomly - create a rule to color messages from domain = x, didn't work; then tried a rule to color messages to = one of my 3 email addresses ... that worked on about 80% of the messages to that email address (***? no discernable pattern!) after exiting and re-launching mail ... Finally realizing this thing just doesn't work I deleted all the rules ... several exits/re-launches I now still have about 80% of my messages to one email address I use colored, with no discernable pattern. There are no rules now.
Using OS X 10.7.4 on a 2.53 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo Mac Book Pro w/ 4 GB Ram, Mail 5.2. Have 3 email addresses, 1 Mobileme using IMAP and 2 Gmail addresses using IMAP.
Thanks.

If you have no rules, then applying them won't change a thing. Once a messages is colored, you would have to create a rule to change the color again.
However, sometimes moving the message back to the inbox will change the color back, expecially with imap since it really has to download it back to the inbox.
If the rules are corrupted, then maybe try this:
First, quit Mail. Have a current backup in case of trouble.
Select Go>, then Go to Folder in the Finder menu. Paste this to get to this folder in the Home Library:
~/Library/Mail/V2/MailData/
Move the MessageRules.plist files to the trash.
If you want to rebuild the message database at the same time, move the Envelope Index files to the trash. (Do not empty as they can be put back if problems arise).
Open Mail. If you chose to rebuild the database, then hit continue in the Message. This will rebuild your message index and could take a while, so be patient.
Try to create a rule and see if it works now.

Source IP Address Access Rule Not Working

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for