SPA3102 - Line 1 - Outgoing VOIP calls fail

I recently reset my SPA3102.
After configuring Line 1; I am able to receive VOIP & PSTN calls on the analog phone attached but unable to make outgoing VOIP calls, I can only make outgoing calls via PSTN.
My dial plan is as follows:
(xx.|<#9,xx.<:@gw0>)
I can call the outside world by dialing #9 and then the phone number but I cannot call any VOIP extensions, when I try, I do I get the busy tone after a few seconds.
Please help, I’ve spend hours trying to figure this out to no avail.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Thanks for your response,
I finally resolved the problem after spending many more hours on it.
It turns out the problem had nothing to do with my dial plan, it had to do with a service provider (SPA3102) I had configured on my asterisk box; adjusting the configuration on that solved the problem.

Similar Messages

VOIP call Failed (Error Code 15) in Prime Event log.

I'm seeing the following events in Prime Infrastructure related to Cisco 7925 phones.
VOIP Call Failed for "(Error Code 15) occurred on client "xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx' which was associated to AP <APName> on interface 802.11b/g.
I can't seem to find where this error code 15 is defined. The closest I was able to find was error code 15 under gatekeeper codes in the following document which may or may not be relavent.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/voice/monitor/configuration/guide/vt_voip_err_cds_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html
Any insight into this would be appreciated.
Jake
P.S. No voip call jokes on 802.11b/g please

It had 18Mbps set as the min phy rate. I also think it has to do with CAC issues at 18Mbps that are pretty well noted and differeing mandatory rates across the 802.11b/g/n and 802.11a/n networks on the controller. When the phone would roam onto a radio with 18Mbps was the min mandatory rate, it would drop and give this error.

Making outgoing & receiving calls failed iphone 4

Having prob to make outgoing calls & receive calls for my iphone 4,pls advice...

So contact the carrier to report and troubleshoot the issue.

HELP! Can make outgoing VoIP calls but no incoming

I am hoping someone can help me out here! I am trying to get a Cisco Small Business unified communication device to connect through my DSL service. I am using a SIP trunk registration through ViaTalk and can register on their server and make outgoing calls without issue. I have yet to be able to receive incoming calls. I spent 6+ hours on the phone with Cisco tech support and they tell me it is my router blocking the incoming traffic. I set my modem/router up with a DMZ, have tried to forward all port, disabled SIP ALG and still nothing. When I called ViaTalk to see if they noticed incoming calls on their SIP server they said that everything looked good except that the port that is used for the communication seems to be altered. Does anyone know if this is something that Verizon may/may not be doing? Outgoing calls are handled on port 5060, but the ViaTalk tech support said that the request was coming through on the incoming side on port 56739. I am using a Netgear DGND3300 because the Westell 7500 is better used as a paper weight.

Thanks for the catch dslr ... I spend so much time over in the FiOS section, I totally missed this was in the DSL section.
So, with that said, has the OP had any luck getting the log files for us to look at? We should be seeing traffic coming from ViaTalk when incoming calls come in and that's what we need to see.
Also, not clear if you have the Verizon gear still in the loop here or are justing usng the Netgear. If the Verizon modem is in the picture, is it operating in bridge mode (not router mode)?

Spa3102 would not forward a voip call to pstn line

Good morning.
I've done the implementation provided here http://community.linksys.com/t5/VoIP-Adapters/SPA-3102-and-softphone-to-
make-calls-via-pstn-line/td-p/326390 .
It is a way to use for outgoing calls a given pstn line from anywhere I have internet (voip to pstn).
The spa3102 is connected to a router (with an active DHCP server and ip 192.168.1.1) from where it takes the internal
ip (192.168.1.3).On the same network is also a computer , connected to the router ( with ip 192.168.1.2). The spa3102
is set to bridge mode and thus inactivates the function of the router (on SPA3102), and it functions as a simple
network device . I have done port forwarding (from the router) to 192.168.1.3 (SPA3102) for the port 5061 (PSTN
LINE) ( but for 5060 for the LINE 1 also). I want to make calls from a voip softphone (x-lite 4) to the SPA 3102 and
this to forward the voip calls to PSTN line to which it is connected. In x-lite the SPA3102 is set as a proxy so that
i can type the phone number I want to call without being followed by the SPA3102's ip each time ( eg on x-lite I
give call number 2101111111 instead of 2101111111 @ wanip: 5061 where wanip is the external ip of the router).
When x-lite is running on the computer that is on the same network with the SPA3102 everything works as expected. A
voip call is made from x-lite ( using as a proxy the wanip everytime, or even for test purposes the dyndns domain
that i set up for this reason), this call is passese PSTN line and the phone of the called party rings . At x-lite
COMES indication "call established ".
The problem occurs when I do the same procedure from x-lite installed on a computer belonging to another network (
e.g. in another building with its own internet connection , own router, own computer , etc. ) . Always using the
wanip the x-lite makes the voip call to the SPA3102, writes "call established" ( meaning it connected to SPA3102) but
never routed the call to the called party ( the SPA3102 did not forward voip calls it receives to the PSTN line ) .
Trying to find what 's wrong I've tried to disable all firewalls (soft and hard from all involved machines ) . The
behavior is the same either the computer that makes the successful calls is connected to the network directly to the
router or through the port "ethernet" on the SPA3102.
What is the difference in these two voip calls to the SPA3102 and the one " triggers " it to forward the call to
PSTN line and the other does not ?
Thanks now for any ideas you give .

The audio sound problem is more than likely also associated with the overall addressing problem initially encountered. As you may know, using the sip protocol the sip signalling exchanges ip addresses to be used for both the sip signalling and the exchange of rtp sound packets. In addition there is an exchange of port numbers to be used for the exchange of rtp sound packets. The sound is exchanged by two separate streams of packets, one stream in each direction. The result is an ip address and port number for the rtp packets flowing from the SPA3102 to the softphone and a different ip address and port number for the rtp packets flowing from the softphone to the SPA3102.
In your previous posting you mentioned that you "set the minimum EXTernal rtp port at the sip tab". Changing the "EXT RTP Port Min:" is an unusual change to make and in my opinion would only be made in special circumstances. Actually, I ran some tests and I'm not sure exactly what that setting does. In my tests it didn't appear to affect the rtp port number used in a predictable manner.
The common changes to make for audio problems typically would be to setup a STUN server. A STUN server is an external server that echos back to the initial sender the external ip address and port number that the STUN server received with the message received by the server. This allows the sender (SPA3102 or softphone) to determine its external ip address and external port numbers for both the sip signalling and rtp packets.
A STUN server is commonly recommended to be setup with the following settings in the SPA3102:
PSTN Line Tab:
NAT Mapping Enable: Yes
Sip Tab:
Handle VIA received: yes
Handle VIA rport: yes
Insert VIA received: yes
Insert VIA rport: yes
Substitute VIA Addr: yes
Send Resp To Src Port: yes
STUN Enable: yes
STUN Server:
The following web page has a list of "Public STUN Servers"
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/STUN
You are using CounterPath's XLite softphone. stun.counterpath.net is a STUN server on the list.
I see XLite also has a setting to use a STUN server on the "Topology" tab.

When making an outgoing call, it rings once and then says 'Call failed' - any solutions?

When making an outgoing call, it rings once and then says 'Call failed' - any solutions?

I had the same problem!! I had to complain quite a few times to AT&T & found out I had to get the 3G MicroCell device. You also have to pay an extra $20 a month for it! You have to purchase it yourself($200)...which is a bunch of crap too!! But they can research your area & when they finally figure out that it's a bad servise area they will give it to you for FREE!! Now my phone works like it's supposed to!! So check it out!! Good Luck!!

"Call Failed" several times when making an outgoing call

I get constant "Call Failed" messages when attempting to make an outgoing call from my iPhone 4. The issue started happening about 3 weeks ago. AT&T originally said there was a problem in the area, but it should be fixed soon. Now they say all towers are up and running, but the problem still happens. I've had Apple replace the phone, but the problem still happens. Never had any issues with AT&T coverage/service in my area, never a dropped call. Most calls are made at home which is less than a mile from the AT&T tower. Now I think it might have started with the release of 4.3??

I had the same problem!! I had to complain quite a few times to AT&T & found out I had to get the 3G MicroCell device. You also have to pay an extra $20 a month for it! You have to purchase it yourself($200)...which is a bunch of crap too!! But they can research your area & when they finally figure out that it's a bad servise area they will give it to you for FREE!! Now my phone works like it's supposed to!! So check it out!! Good Luck!!

My iphone 3Gs is disconnecting on outgoing calls on a very regular basis stating call failed. Is this a common problem and how do I resolve the issue?

My Iphone 3Gs disconnects during outgoing calls very regularly when reception is fine. Message on phone is Call Failed. Is there a simple solution for this this or does it require specialist Apple fix

Have you reported this to your carrier? Perhaps your SIM is faulty.

Redirecting Voip call to another termination router

Hello All
The structure is very simple: There is one originating router (as5300 let say A) and
one terminating router (as5300 let say B) with 1 pri line. I want to route some calls whose have specific destination pattern from B to another router (let say C) to be terminated.
I have used "dial-peer voice xx voip" with "session target ipv4:x.x.x.x. on B.
But it failed. When I debug it on B ,it gives " can not gateway with C".
Do you think the idea is wrong for this structure . or how can I do this ( PS :I can administrate only termination routers )
thanks in advance..

to tapatel:
First of all thank you for your assistance
Router B is not making call origination, it is only termination router.
Router A (I do not manage router A), is sending voip calls to B and I want to route some calls which has specific destination pattern from B to C. The configuration for B is like this:
! the dial-peer 101 and 99 below is working properly
dial-peer voice 101 pots
destination-pattern 3054T
port 0:1
prefix ,054
dial-peer voice 99 voip
destination pattern 3054T
session target ipv4:10.2.2.2 (the ip address of router A)
! I want to route it to router C with the lines below
dial-peer voice 102 voip
destination-pattern 30549238.....
session target ipv4:10.10.1.124 (this is the ip address of router C)
May be I have to use gatekeeper for this project but i am not sure if it is necessary.

Call failed - reason required

In the attached log file, a call comes in, which shows up reports as "Aborted". I would like to know what was the reason this call failed.
Call flow:
PSTN --- PRI -- Voice Gateway (2900 series) -- SIP -- CUCM9 ---- UCCX9
On UCCX, it should go to a script which determines that it's within business hours, and redirects the call to the hunt pilot with phone number +33173150110
Details:
Called nr: +33173150194
Calling nr: +33628329975
Timestamp: Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:03:33 GMT
It starts on line 4136.
I can see that the call gets reINVITED a couple of times, and it seems to me that after the last INVITE, there's no media path, so I understand why the voice gateway would send a BYE. However, I don't understand why there's no media path.
Thanks

Hi Tom,
From the logs I can see that the call goes to UCCX using the CTI port and gets transferred back to a Hunt List, with DN 33173150110 for the pilot.
The Hunt List gets exhausted.
08729403.006 |09:03:37.554 |AppInfo |UNKNOWN_ALARM:HuntListExhausted - HuntListName:Card Team France App ID:Cisco CallManager Cluster ID:StandAloneCluster Node ID:UC-CUCM-CERGY
08729403.009 |09:03:37.555 |AppInfo |HuntListCdrc::terminateCall - Sending CcRejInd, with cause code (17), to Cc because it has not sent CcRegisterPartyB to Cc.
The call then connects to another entity anyway, after exhaustion of the hunt list. IP address of that entity is below. This should give you an idea of where the caller is connected.
08729567.001 |09:03:38.467 |AppInfo |//SIP/SIPUdp/wait_SdlSPISignal: Outgoing SIP UDP message to 172.25.56.130:[5060]:
[358209,NET]
ACK sip:[email protected]:5060 SIP/2.0
c=IN IP4 172.25.56.130
m=audio 24558 RTP/AVP 0 101
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
Caller then hangs up the call. This bye comes in from gateway with normal disconnect cause 16.
08729858.003 |09:03:52.094 |AppInfo |//SIP/SIPUdp/wait_UdpDataInd: Incoming SIP UDP message size 600 from 172.25.56.130:[56693]:
[358217,NET]
BYE sip:[email protected]:5060 SIP/2.0

Error during installation of ECC6- system call failed

Dear all,
i encounter the error as below during sap installation. its looks like the ID issue, but this id (fbqadm) is using by me to log into the windows. please help me.
thank
ERROR      2009-03-17 10:07:25.583 [syxxsyshlp.cpp:78]
           syslib::printOSError(const iastring &, int, DWORD, const iastring &, CMessage::eLogMessage)
FSL-00001 System call failed. Error 1326 (Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password.
) in execution of system call 'LogonUser' with parameter (fbqadm, SAPFBWDEV01, *******, LOGON32_LOGON_INTERACTIVE,LOGON32_PROVIDER_DEFAULT,&hUserToken), line (1014) in file (synxccuren.cpp).
TRACE      2009-03-17 10:07:25.813 [iaxxejsbas.hpp:408]
           handleException<ESyException>()
Converting exception into JS Exception ESyException.
TRACE      2009-03-17 10:07:25.813
Function setMessageIdOfExceptionMessage: modlib.jslib.caughtException

problem fix after reboot the server

Transfer VOIP Calls Between Cisco Desk Phone and Cisco Jabber For IPhone 9.5

Does anyone know how to transfer an active voip call from a Cisco IP Desk Phone to Cisco Jabber for IPhone? I can transfer a call from Cisco Jabber for IPhone to my Cisco IP Desk Phone no problem. I put the call on hold and then click "Resume" on my Cisco IP Desk Phone. However I cannot do the same but the other way around. If I put the call on hold on my Cisco IP Desk Phone, I see "no active call" on my Jabber client. The only information I could find slighlty relevant was using the Mobility Key/Remote Destination Profile feature however this defeats the object as this will forward to an external number, e.g. mobile and I just want to transfer the call within the VOIP environment between the two devices that are using the same directory number.
I am using Cisco Call Manager 9.1(2), Cisco Presence 9.1 and Cisco Jabber for IPhone 9.5.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Kind Regards,
Paul Parker.

Did you ever find an answer to this ?
I am seeing the same behavior and trying so see if I can put calls on hold and pick them up both ways also.
The only answer I seem to have found is to use park instead
That would/should work but I would just prefer to hold/unhold
Just not sure why we would not be able to hold/unhold on what is essentially a "shared" line
Does anyone have this working for them ?

Event ID: 5014, 5004 The DFS Replication Service is stopping communication with partner / Error 1726 (The remote procedure call failed.)

I'm replicating between two servers in two sites (Server A - Server 2012 R2 STD, Server B - Server 2008 R2) over a VPN (Sonicwall Firewall). Though the initial replication seems to be
happening it is very slow (the folder in question is less than 3GB). I'm seeing these in the event viewer every few minutes:
The DFS Replication service is stopping communication with partner PPIFTC for replication group FTC due to an error. The service will retry the connection periodically.
Additional Information:
Error: 1726 (The remote procedure call failed.)
and then....
The DFS Replication service successfully established an inbound connection with partner PPIFTC for replication group FTC.
Here are all my troubleshooting steps (keep in mind that our VPN is going through a SonicWall <--I increased the TCP timeout to 24 hours):
-Increased TCP Timeout to 24 hours
-Added the following values on both sending and receiving members and rebooted server
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters
Value =DisableTaskOffload
Type = DWORD
Data = 1
Value =EnableTCPChimney
Type = DWORD
Data = 0
Value =EnableTCPA
Type = DWORD
Data = 0
Value =EnableRSS
Type = DWORD
Data = 0
---------------------------------more troubleshooting--------------------------
-Disabled AntiVirus on both members
-Made sure DFSR TCP ports 135 & 5722 are open
-Installed all hotfixes for 2008 R2 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/968429) and rebooted
-Ran NETSTAT –ANOBP TCP and the DFS executable results are listed below:
Sending Member:
[DFSRs.exe]
TCP    10.x.x.x:53            0.0.0.0:0
LISTENING       1692
[DFSRs.exe]
TCP    10.x.x.x:54669
10.x.x.x:5722          TIME_WAIT       0
TCP    10.x.x.x:54673
10.x.x.x:5722          ESTABLISHED     1656
[DFSRs.exe]
TCP    10.x.x.x:64773
10.x.x.x:389           ESTABLISHED     1692
[DFSRs.exe]
TCP    10.x.x.x:64787
10.x.x.x:389           ESTABLISHED     1656
[DFSRs.exe]
TCP    10.x.x.x:64795
10.x.x.x:389           ESTABLISHED     2104
Receiving Member:
[DFSRs.exe]
TCP    10.x.x.x:56683
10.x.x.x:389           ESTABLISHED     7472
[DFSRs.exe]
TCP    10.x.x.x:57625
10.x.x.x:54886         ESTABLISHED     2808
[DFSRs.exe]
TCP    10.x.x.x:61759
10.x.x.x:57625         TIME_WAIT       0
TCP    10.x.x.x:61760
10.x.x.x:57625         TIME_WAIT       0
TCP    10.x.x.x:61763
10.x.x.x:57625         TIME_WAIT       0
TCP    10.x.x.x:61764
10.x.x.x:57625         TIME_WAIT       0
TCP    10.x.x.x:61770
10.x.x.x:57625         TIME_WAIT       0
TCP    10.x.x.x:61771
10.x.x.x:57625         TIME_WAIT       0
TCP    10.x.x.x:61774
10.x.x.x:57625         TIME_WAIT       0
TCP    10.x.x.x:61775
10.x.x.x:57625         TIME_WAIT       0
TCP    10.x.x.x:61776
10.x.x.x:57625         TIME_WAIT       0
TCP    10.x.x.x:61777
10.x.x.x:57625         TIME_WAIT       0
TCP    10.x.x.x:61778
10.x.x.x:57625         TIME_WAIT       0
TCP    10.x.x.x:61779
10.x.x.x:57625         TIME_WAIT       0
TCP    10.x.x.x:61784
10.x.x.x:52757         ESTABLISHED     7472
[DFSRs.exe]
TCP    10.x.x.x:63661
10.x.x.x:63781         ESTABLISHED     4880
------------------------------more troubleshooting--------------------------
-Increased Staging to 32GB
-Opened the ADSIedit.msc console to verify the "Authenticated Users" is set with the default READ permission on the following object:
a. The computer object of the DFS server
b. The DFSR-LocalSettings object under the DFS server computer object
-Ran
ping <var>10.x.x.x</var> -f -l 1472 and got replies back from both servers
-AD replication is successful on all partners
-Nslookup is working so DNS is working
-Updated NIC drivers on both servers
- I ran the following to set the Primary Member:
dfsradmin Membership Set /RGName:<replication group name> /RFName:<replicated folder name> /MemName:<primary member> /IsPrimary:True
Then Dfsrdiag Pollad /Member:<member name>
I'm seeing these errors in the dfsr logs:
20141014 19:28:17.746 9116 SRTR   957 [WARN] SERVER_EstablishSession Failed to establish a replicated folder session. connId:{45C8C309-4EDD-459A-A0BB-4C5FACD97D44} csId:{7AC7917F-F96F-411B-A4D8-6BB303B3C813}
Error:
+ [Error:9051(0x235b) UpstreamTransport::EstablishSession upstreamtransport.cpp:808 9116 C The content set is not ready]
+ [Error:9051(0x235b) OutConnection::EstablishSession outconnection.cpp:532 9116 C The content set is not ready]
+ [Error:9051(0x235b) OutConnection::EstablishSession outconnection.cpp:471 9116 C The content set is not ready]
---------------------------------------more troubleshooting-----------------------------
I've done a lot of research on the Internet and most of it is pointing to the same stuff I've tried. Does anyone have any other suggestions? Maybe I need to look somewhere
else on the server side or firewall side?
I tried replicating from a 2012 R2 server to another 2012 server and am getting the same events in the event log so maybe it's not a server issue.
Some other things I'm wondering:
-Could it be the speed of the NICs? Server A is a 2012 Server that has Hyper-V installed. NIC teaming was initially setup and since Hyper-V is installed the NIC is a "vEthernet
(Microsoft Network Adapter Multiplexor Driver Virtual Switch) running at a speed of 10.0Gbps whereas Server B is running a single NIC at 1.0Gbps
-Could occasional ping timeout's cause the issue? From time to time I get a timeout but it's not as often as the events I'm seeing. I'm getting 53ms pings. The folder
is only 3 GB so it shouldn't take that long to replicate but it's been days. The schedule I have set for replication is mostly all day except for our backup times which start at 11pm-5am. Throughout the rest of the time I have it set anywhere from
4Mbps to 64 Kbps. Server A is on a 5mb circuit and Server B is on a 10mb circuit.

I'm seeing the same errors, all servers are running 2008 R2 x64. Across multiple sites, VPN is steady and reliably.
185 events from 12:28:21 to 12:49:25
Events are for all five servers (one per office, five total offices, no two in the same city, across three states).
Events are not limited to one replication group. I have quite a few replication groups, so I don't know for sure but I'm running under the reasonable assumption that none are spared.
Reminder from original post (and also, yes, same for me), the error is: Error: 1726 (The remote procedure call failed.)
Some way to figure out what code triggers an Event ID 5014, and what code therein specifies an Error 1726, would extremely helpful. Trying random command line/registry changes on live servers is exceptionally unappealing.
Side note, 1726 is referenced here:
https://support.microsoft.com/kb/976442?wa=wsignin1.0
But it says, "This RPC connection problem may be caused by an unstable WAN connection." I don't believe this is the case for my system.
It also says...
For most RPC connection problems, the DFS Replication service will try to obtain the files again without logging a warning or an error in the DFS Replication log. You can capture the network trace to determine whether the cause of the problem is at the network
layer. To examine the TCP ports that the DFS Replication service is using on replication partners, run the following command in a
Command Prompt window:
NETSTAT –ANOBP TCP
This returns all open TCP connections. The connections in question are "DFSRs.exe", which the command won't let you filter for.
Instead, I used the NETSTAT command as advertised, dumping output to info.txt:
NETSTAT -ANOBP TCP >> X:\info.txt
Then I opened Excel and manually opened the .TXT for the open wizard. I chose fixed-width fields based on the first row for each result, and then added a column:
=IF(A3="Can not", "Can not obtain ownership information", IF(LEFT(A3,1) = "[", A3&B3&C3, ""))
Dragging this down through the entire file let me see that row (Row F) as the file name. Some anomalies were present but none impacted DFSrs.exe results.
Finally, you can sort/filter (I sorted because I like being able to see everything, should I choose to) to get just the results you need, with the partial rows removed from the result set, or bumped to the end.
My server had 125 connections open.
That is a staggering number of connections to review, and I feel like I'm looking for a needle in a haystack.
I'll see if I can find anything useful out, but a better solution would be most wonderful.

System call failed. Error 2 (The system cannot find the file specified. ) in execution of system call 'CreateProcessAsUser' with parameter ( , NULL, Program Files/sapinst_instdir/BS2011/ERP606/AS-ABAP/SYB/HA/DB, &StartupInfo, &ProcessInfo),

Dear All,
I am getting a below error while doing ehp6 installation on sybase (high availbility )
can any one help me on this..?
An error occurred while processing option SAP Business Suite 7i 2011 > Enhancement Package 6 for SAP ERP 6.0 > SAP Application Server ABAP > SAP ASE > High-Availability System > Database Instance( Last error reported by the step: System call failed. Error 2 (The system cannot find the file specified. ) in execution of system call 'CreateProcessAsUser' with parameter ( , NULL, Program Files/sapinst_instdir/BS2011/ERP606/AS-ABAP/SYB/HA/DB, &StartupInfo, &ProcessInfo), line (646) in file (d:\depot\bas\720_rel\bc_720-2_rel\gen\optu\ntamd64\ins\sapinst\impl\src\syslib\synxcchapp.cpp), stack trace: d:\depot\bas\720_rel\bc_720-2_rel\gen\optu\ntamd64\ins\sapinst\impl\src\ejs\ejscontroller.cpp: 181: EJSControllerImpl::executeScript() d:\depot\bas\720_rel\bc_720-2_rel\gen\optu\ntamd64\ins\sapinst\impl\src\ejs\jsextension.hpp: 1059: CallFunctionBase::call() d:\depot\bas\720_rel\bc_720-2_rel\gen\optu\ntamd64\ins\sapinst\impl\src\osmod\iaxxbprocess.cpp: 423: CIaOsProcess::start_impl() d:\depot\bas\720_rel\bc_720-2_rel\gen\optu\ntamd64\ins\sapinst\impl\src\syslib\synxcchapp.cpp: 238: CSyChildApplicationImpl::start(false) d:\depot\bas\720_rel\bc_720-2_rel\gen\optu\ntamd64\ins\sapinst\impl\src\syslib\synxcchapp.cpp: 262: CSyChildApplicationImpl::doStart() .). You can no
Regards,
Letz..

Hello Mauricio.
Thanks
Two Thinks:
1.- This error appears precisely in the process of creating SAP users including you mention sidadm:
      A.- Execute sapinst
      B.- Installation option is chosen
            SAP NetWeaver CE Production Edition
                    Installation Options
                        High-Availability System
                              Central Service Instance (SCS)
       c.- System ID, Next and appear message error
2.- However, the user manually create sidadm, I gave the permissions you indicate, and the error message is the same
Thanks

Cross lines in voip. help needed !!

hi all ,
i wasnt much familiar abt cross lines in voip (though we get cross lines on PSTN) till i got cross line last week.
I got a GK to which my GWs will get registered to ,
there were two GWs with same GW ID , registered with
my GK which caused cross line for first time.
(note: either it can be duplication of ID or duplication of IP)
but now the problem is , im getting CROSS line when im on a confrence call. it happened two or 3 times , but when i checked all my GWs are registed with the GK properly , there wasnt any duplicaiton on ID or IP. cna some one help me in this issue ?
thanks
Prashanth

The reason why crosstalk occurs in the first place is because long cable runs radiate some power, and cables that are run parallel to them will pick up this radiation by induction.
Check out your cabling . the pin numbers and the cable corresponds according to specfication .

SPA3102 - Line 1 - Outgoing VOIP calls fail

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for