SPEC CINT2006 Confusion

I am being asked by a vendor to produce a quote for some servers. In their documentation, they list ‘SPEC CINT2006 Rate’ requirements for each of the server tiers. When I look up our Tier 1 and Tier 2 VMWare hosts, the Tier 1 hosts are rated at a CINT2006 Rate of about 800, and our Tier 2 hosts are rated at about 250.
From VMWare’s standpoint, would you consider a cluster of ten hosts with a rating of 800 each to be able to provide guests of a performance level 800, or would you consider that cluster to be able to support up to 8000 rating cumulative guests?

Greetings,
I was expecting to see UIPanel and UIForm either implement NamingContainer or extend UINamingContainer in the reference implementation. Since UIForm is often the root component in a number of the samples, this doesn't gel with the spec (which requires root components to be naming containers).
Could someone please set me straight? I am obviously having great difficulty with this whole NamingContainer concept.
Regards,
Bill

Similar Messages

Guidance for HDD upgrade MacBook Pro 2007

Like the title says, I want to put in a heftier HDD on this computer, which has a Model ID of 3,1, 2.4GHz. Some of the choices and specs are confusing, so all knowledgable advice would be appreciated. It seems that the computer will only support up to 500GB drive, and the chip appears to be limited to 1.5 GBs connection speed, and I find no drives with less than 3GBs. I know that is generally backwards compatible, but is there any limit where it's not, at say 6GBs? And it appears to be true that this model will not support an SDD, but will it support a hybrid drive, like the ones Seagate makes?
Again, any advice and experience appreciated.
Thanks,
-gg

• is there any limit where it's not, at say 6GBs?
So far, all the sata drives are backwards compatible. Folks like MacWorld that keep an eye on this stuff have never given us a heads-up.
• And it appears to be true that this model will not support an SDD,
Are you sure? Where did you see that? Check what this site has to say: http://www.macsales.com
The ssd upgrade is well worththe trouble and the expense - the speed boost is quite amazing. SSD should be officially renamed Super Sonic Drive.

K8n neo platinum with 3-4 gig

does anybody have this board running with either 3 or 4 gig of ram? Details please??
I thought I was buying a ddr400 board for 4 gig of ram. I'm a little pissed that i will probably end up with 3 gig at ddr 333. If i can't even get that then i'll have to replace with a good motherboard.
Thanks,

It's a k8n neo2 platinum
The memory charts and specs are confusing and contridictory and wrong. They esentialy duplicate what's in my manual.
page 8: chart for DDr 400 showing 128 to 1 gig on each channel and system density of 512 to 4 gig
just below that is another chart for memory combinations that shows 4 double sided dimms runs at DDR 333
Since there is no such thing as a single sided 1 gig dimm i'll assume the first chart is wrong.
in between is a note that says installing 3 modules can cause failure.
page 9: a note says the system density will only be detected up to 3 gig when all slots are filled with 1 gig dimms.
This seems to imply that I have to install 4 1 gig dimms to get 3 gigs usable. and there is aparently no way to get 4 gigs usable. Despite the numerous other places in the manual and msi's website that call this a 4 gig board.
After studying the manual, and msi's website, I don't know what the max memory is for this board or what to buy to get there. I'm reluctant to spend anymore money on memory that won't work unless somebody else has tried it first. There aparently are a lot of people running 2 1 gig modules sucessfully, but I need more. Is anybody running 3 or 4 gig?

HOW DO YOU GUYS DEAL WITH APPLE.. SO CONFUSING...NEED HELP WITH SPECS FOR PURCHASE OF IMAC 21.5

Hi guys, been reading your forums, blogposts, etc and am getting more confused. I'm just a video girl trying to produce meaningful content through web videos for small to mid sized businesses and want to come over from the dark side.
Good news,, I dont need a super giant system, I do simple editing for web videos, minimal graphics, no motion graphics, no animation etc. currently using CS4, will probably end up with 5.5.
I want to get imac 21.5 or 27 if i have to.. So here's the question we all have,,, what do I really need besides an Apple fairy godmother to figure this crazy stuff out?????
I want to be able to have firewire add on, but the rest is what I need help with. So i've been looking at cs6 specs, even though im not there yet, eventually will be,, so just need to run cs4 now and build from there. I also want to eventually move to final cut down the road so I want imac able to upgrade to final cut.
WHAT DO I REALLY NEED MINIMALLY FOR NOW? WHAT CAN I GET LATER IF i CHOOSE TO DO MORE AND NEED MORE POWER?
cs6:
Multicore Intel processor with 64-bit support
Mac OS X v10.6.8, v10.7, or v10.8**
4GB of RAM (8GB recommended)
4GB of available hard-disk space for installation; additional free space required during installation (cannot install on a volume that uses a case-sensitive file system or on removable flash storage devices)
Additional disk space required for preview files and other working files (10GB recommended)
1280x900 display
7200 RPM hard drive (multiple fast disk drives, preferably RAID 0 configured, recommended)
OpenGL 2.0–capable system
DVD-ROM drive compatible with dual-layer DVDs (SuperDrive for burning DVDs; Blu-ray burner for creating Blu-ray Disc media)
QuickTime 7.6.6 software required for QuickTime features
Optional: Adobe-certified GPU card for GPU-accelerated performance
Any responses would be great. I know you guys are busy answering the really high end tech questions

All the current iMac models (both 21.5" and 27" with OS X Mt. Lion 10.8) will run CS4, 5.5 and 6 just fine. They will also run Final Cut Pro X just fine. Ditto for most any application you may want to use.
Below are some notes (specific to your apparent requirements) that may help you with your purchase decision:
Notes on purchasing a 21.5" iMac
All 21.5" iMacs come with 8GB RAM but you cannot add more later. I strongly suggest getting the maximum RAM (16GB) when you order the iMac.
The basic hard drive is a 1TB 5400rpm drive. It will work fine with Adobe CS but you will probably want the added speed of the optional 1TB Fusion drive for better performance. Some people will recommend/argue for one of the optional SSD drives instead, but they are very expensive and still only come in relatively small capacities - I don't recommend the SSD drives. Get the Fusion drive and spend any extra money on a good external hard drive for backup and/or extra storage instead of an SSD.
Notes on purchasing a 27" iMac
All 27" iMacs come with 8GB RAM and you can add more later, up to 32GB
The basic hard drive is a 1TB 7200rpm drive - it will be fine with Adobe CS. There are upgrade options to a 3TB 7200rpm drive or a 1TB or 3TB fusion drive - these will be fine also. There are also SSD drive options, but I do not recommend them. (Same comments as above.)
Notes on all the current iMacs
iMacs no longer come with built-in CD/DVD drives. If you need one, you will need to purchase the Apple Superdrive accessory drive ($79)
All of the iMac graphic processors (GPU's) are compatible with Adobe CS 4, 5.5, 6
It is very difficult to impossible to change or upgrade the hard drive later on, so don't buy low-end thinking you can add a better internal hard drive later.
Be aware that Macs always come with the latest (most recent) version of OS X. And OS X Mavericks (10.9) is due to be released soon (in the next month or two). There is no guarantee that the older Adobe CS 4 or 5.5 versions will run on OS X Mavericks. If you cannot upgrade to CS 6 in the near future, you may want to purchase now rather than after OS X Mavericks is released.
For what it's worth, I'd recommend the 27" iMac if your budget can afford it. You will appreciate the larger screen size and added capabilities over the years you will use the computer.

Confusing Specs for Master Collection

Hi Folks,
I have CS6 Master Collection from a download. Now I need to buy a computer. I'd prefer to get a laptop that's running Windows. I know. That's not the thing these days. But the only support I can get where I live is for Windows and I need a smaller computer. It's hard to run for the border with a desktop under your arm. And I travel a lot, too. The areas where I work don't have cloud access, generally.
I'm at the beginning of this process and I'm learning. Forgive me ahead of time if I make blunders. It's OK to send me in the right direction.
The minimum specs for CS6 are a bit confusing. I'll get more than the minimums, once I figure out the direction. Here's what I see as the big points. They're straight from Adobe's system requirements for CS6.
Intel® Pentium® 4 or AMD Athlon® 64 processor with 64-bit support; Intel Core™2 Duo or AMD Phenom® II processor required for Premiere Pro, After Effects, and Encore; Intel Core i7 processor required for SpeedGrade
Optional (I'll get this if I can): 7200 RPM or faster hard drive (multiple fast disk drives, preferably RAID 0 configured, recommended) for v
RAM (I'll get more than this) 2GB of RAM (4GB recommended) for 32 bit; 4GB of RAM (8GB recommended) for 64 bit
I definitely want to use Premier and After Effects. SpeedGrade would be great to use, too. But, are the specs on the first bullet point saying that SpeedGrade won't work or won't work well with the processor that will run Premier? I'm confounded, if that's the case.
Any ideas you can send my way would be much appreciated.
Thanks
CS

What I bought around January 2014 was a factory refurbished ASUS G750JW that was originally at BestBuy for about $1250 I found for $900. I got the 8GB unit and immediately upgraded it to 24 GB of RAM and then cloned the OS on the lousy 1 TB 5400 rpm drive to a 128 GB Samsung 840. And then installed a 256 GB Samsung 840 Pro in the second drive bay. This then made it a wonderful editing machine. In the process of many edits on this machine I found the some USB3 Flash memory drives worked absolutely great as read-only devices for holding the Project Files and the media. Unfortunately the PNY USB3 Flash Drives that I originally used which had great read speeds which originally had 180 MB/second read speeds were changed and now are lousy I am still looking for a replacement that will test as well or better than my original three PNY turbo, later versions were lousy
Both Asus with their newer G751, MSI with their GT 70 and 80 series and Lenovo with the Lenovo Y50-70 Laptop - 59421859 offer great possibilities.

NSS 300 series confusing power specs

Hi,
I am trying to figure out the minimum UPS specs required to use with a NSS324 NAS. But on the Cisco documents (quick start guide and admin guide) the text are quite confusing. There is a table where the power input for the 2 Bays unit (NS322) is said to be 7 Amps and 3.5A for the models 324 and 326. As the specs does not states at which voltage are these current measured (in a range from 100 to 240V), I assume it to be at the minimum (100V) or 700VA ("W" power factor = ?). 700W for two HD and one motherbard? And half that figure for 4 and 6 bays? That does not sound right to me. The same documents inform that the UPS must operate for 10 minutes (minimum) and be able to provide 350W. That is not the same to say that you MUST provide 350W FOR 10 minutes. If this is true, buying an UPS from APC I must choose an 1200VA unit, that seems a bit overkill to me. Someone has a better picture for this scenario? I would appreciate any help!
Andre Wiermann
Brazil

Sorry,
I meant to say 250 Watt Powersupply for NSS324. I moved a line while reading.
And here is the rest:
NSS322 Smart Storage
NSS324 Smart Storage
NSS326 Smart Storage
Power Supply (Wattage)
80W
250W
250W
Power Consumption (Operation)
25W
35W
43W
Power Consumption (Sleep)
16W
19W
22W

Confusion about Nokia specs pages....

I will be getting a 920... but am saddened to hear Nokia Canada only showing black as a colour choice. So I started looking around to other places I could buy the same phone and found that different sites show different frequencies supported. Is this just a website issue or are there different versions of the phone?
I want to be careful to get a phone that will work with my chosen carrier and their LTE frequencies.
Nokia.ca shows
Operating Frequency Bands
LTE 700
LTE 1900
Meanwhile on Nokia.com for the US I see...
Operating Frequency Frequency bands
LTE 700
LTE 850
LTE 1700
LTE 1900
LTE 2100
And Nokia.fi
Käyttötaajuus Taajuusalueet
LTE 700
LTE 800
LTE 850
LTE 900
LTE 1700
LTE 1800
LTE 1900
LTE 2100
LTE 2600

As much as I would like to believe that is the specs... that doesn't match Canadian frequencies so I wouldn't buy it. Not to mention it shows a completely different LTE list than what I already had.
So which one is right? Or is there more than one "920"?

Confusion with new GarageBand specs....

I use Logic to record-
Always interested in using garageband for basic recording/voiceovers, but because of the maximum standard cd quality settings (44Khz/16bit; normally record almost all audio in 96/24 in other apps) being the highest in GarageBand, it has turned me away.
Now garageband records in 24 bit, but what sampling rate? 44, 48, 96?
all new Macs feature a 96khz/24bit input/output soundcard, will it be used to the fullest?
Thanks

>wonder why they didn't use anything higher
Garageband is intended for beginners. No offense to the people with years experience with GB (like myself) but GB is limited for many many reasons. The first and foremost is money, which I'll get to in a minute...the second is that beginners in the world of recording have no idea what 16 bit and 44.1 kHz even means, much less having options to use them to confuse the cr@p out of them. Don't expect GB to get to much more complicated. Maybe a nifty feature here and there, or some less exciting ones (like Magic GB, podcasting--personal taste) but the overall functionality will always be way behind Logic Express and especially Logic Pro.
That brings me to the money side of things. Garageband is great. It's also something like $17 when one divides the number of apps into the price of iLife. But again it is extremely limited. Apple created Garageband so people would become interested in producing music, much like iMovie makes people interested in making movies. Then when they have the hang of it and start to feel limited they go looking to the more pro applications, like Logic and Final Cut. Both of those "Pro" titles have an "Express" version. So if someone buys iLife, then later buys LP or FC Express, and again feels limited, then buys LP or FC Pro, that one person has spent well over $1,000 to get there. Plus there is Apple's added bonus of selling the only machines that all of these sweet programs work on....
X

HT201364 my imac 2007 meets all the specs for the mavericks update but will not update im very confused

my 2007 macbook meets all specs and required system specs to download mavericks. but it will not download it says my computer isnt running the correct proccesor. i have a screenshot for proof of commet.

Are you sure you don't have this iMac:
http://support.apple.com/kb/SP28
... and that you have this one:
http://support.apple.com/kb/SP16

Confused about spec on new imac

I thought the new macs came with ilife preinstalled, so why does it come as an optional extra when I price it up on the apple store?
Regards. CC.

Hello,
iLife is included with the iMac systems.
I think you're confusing it with the iWorks '06 that is available as an option in the package configuration.
iWorks '06 is the Word Processor, Presentation, and Spread-Sheet program that Apple has been supplying. It is not part of any machine's standard package (except that they include a 30-day trial with all their computers). The full version must be purchased if you want it.
I hope this helps.
Let us know if you have other questions.
P.S., if you'd like, go ahead and click the "Helpful" or "Solved" buttons on any of the posts / replies above if you feel they were helpful or adequately answered your question.

Confusing RAM specs

I have a 15 inch Flat Panel G4 imac at my school am wanting to upgrade the RAM. I did my research, found the right kind to use, and was set. I remove the bottom plate to discover that there already IS a stick of RAM in the user accessible slot. It's 256. I go back to the system profile and i see this:
Memory
DIMM0/J12:
Size: Empty
Type: Empty
Speed: Empty
DIMM1/J13:
Size: 256 MB
Type: SDRAM
Speed: PC133-333
To me, this would indicate that one slot is empty right? However, wasnt the non-user accessible slot supposed to have a stick of ram in it? Instead, it looks like this MAc has the stick JUST in the user accessible slot.
Anyone understand?
I know i can get a stick and just replace that lower stick, but why wouldnt the upper non user accesible slot have a stick in it?

The only way to find out is to open it up. Thats a lot easier than you might think. Look at this:
http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/systems/imacg4/imacg4takeapart.html
Also be aware that the internal Ram is PC 133 168 pin SDRAM.
Message was edited by: macbig

Can too much memory lead to a kernel panic on a MacBook Pro? specs 2.4GHz intel core i7 16GB DDR3 RAM late2011..My laptop began suffering from kernel panics 3 mos ago first noticed using public wifi. Gone thru apple support all the way to engineers

Can too much RAM memory in a late 2011 model macbook pro lead to kernel panic? That is what I was told by a senior supervisor from apple support who troubleshot this issue.First noticed this problem in Dec 2014 while using a private wifi at a relative's home. Did not occur again until Feb1 using a public wifi at a hotel. Never happened on my private wifi network until last night attempting to use airplay. ( have used airplay before without issue). Late 2011 MacBook Pro running 10.9.5; 2.4 GHz Intel core i7, 16 GB DDR3,AMD Radeon HD 6770m 1024 MB graphic card. The laptop came with 8GB RAM and I installed 8 GB about 2 years ago for some reason I cannot remember... probably because I thought the system was slowing down a little. I know that sounds silly. I do not run multiple programs at a time except I leave 6-8 website tabs open simultaneously. I don't photo or video edit. I would describe my use as "light" based on reading these blogs.I had purchased apple support and spent hours on the phone with them in early Feb moving up through support and senior support to sending logs to the "engineers." Of course lots of things were done some of which I am sorry to report I cannot recall their technical definitions. Deleted 3rd party apps/programs; re-worked start up menu; re-installed operating system; reset " this, that and the other" using acrobatic simultaneous key strokes both in and out of safe mode..Anyway the results from the engineers came back and they suggested that if it happened again I was to remove the 8GB of RAM I had installed as the system was getting confused as to which chip to use.( that is my interpretation of what was said..prob dumbed down for me)...Anyway 1 day after these pronouncements came down I read that Apple had agreed to fix graphics cards in some late model 2011 MBPs. I felt this was unlikely to be the issue given all that had been done including an extended hardware test but called the Senior Support Supervisor I was working with to ask him to make sure. He never phoned me back. Should I go to the trouble of removing 8GB of RAM from my laptop? Of course I will try it as the alternative is a new computer.Blogs read that this model can support 16GB but Apple didn't test for it. Senior Supervisor claims this is my trouble. Does that make sense? Not to me....but it is clear to all my level of knowledge. Can a malfunctioning graphics card be missed by an extended hardware test? I appreciate comments.

The RAM needs specs as shown below.
Maximum Memory
16 GB (Actual) 8 GB (Apple)
Memory Slots
2 - 204-pin PC-10600 (1333 MHz) DDR3 SO-DIMM

Need suggestion on the entire hardware specs for running Oracle VM 2.2.2

Hi,
I need some suggestion on the preffered hardware specs which can be given to a customer, he wants to run Oracle VM 2.2.2 or Oracle VM 2.2.1.
He has already used Cisco UCS with NetApp storage for OVM 2.2.2/2.2.1 and has being unsucessful with lots of issues creeping up. Thus now need suggestion on the hardware spec which is well tested and works fine with Oracle VM 2.2.2/2.2.1 and he wants to run Oracle Fusion Middleware on top of it.
Any poniters to it will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Sk

887469 wrote:
Hi Avi,
thank you for that information !
Yes. But only for the UCS gear that uses the converged FCoE adapters. If you have standard Ethernet/FC adapters, then it should be OK.We do use the "M71KR-Q QLogic Converged Network Adapter" with UCS. According to you this is an unsupported combination together with OVM 2.2.1, right ?
Now the "Oracle VM 2.2 Validated Configuration Details" shows UCS B200 M1 with M71KR-Q as a valid configuration. Does 2.2 mean OVM 2.2.0 and this is supported, but 2.2.1 / 2.2.2 is not ?
Please clarify since this confuses me.
Best Regards and TIAAny news for me, please ?
THX

I live outside the US and am confused if i should get a locked or unlocked Iphone 4s?

I live outside the US and probably will not move their either. I am confused if i should purchase a locked or unlocked IPhone 4S. I travel frequently but buy a sim card for each country i travel so i want a phone that i can insert any sim card into. At the same time i also want it so that if i move to the US it will work their too. PLZ HELP FAST!!

Did you read the specs I linked to? All iPads have a sim card slot for local sim cards regardless of where worldwide. Again, a local carrier must offer local iPad data plans and a local sim card.
The Verizon, etc. carrier designations only have significance in the USofA where two networks are avaialable, GSM and CDMA. In the USofA if you subscribe to a USofA carrier using CDMA then you must purchase the iPad designed to use CDMA. But again and per the specifications, any post iPad2 iPad, GSM or CDMA will work worldwide on GSM networks.

Including BPEL as part of the J2EE Spec

Can someone tell me if the BPEL stuff is going to be included in a future version of the J2EE spec? The reason I ask is because there are certain application servers on the market that no longer allow you to deploy a BPEL process, now you have to wrap it in an SCA component. In my opinion this just makes the development/deployment model more confusing.
Thanks

Agreed, adding yet-another-component-model to the picture just complicates the developer's life.
Since BPEL isn't a Java technology, and doesn't have a standard Java binding (pending completion of JSR 207, which is supposed to provide one), I don't think there will be any "BPEL stuff" in any upcoming versions of Java EE on the horizon. That's just my personal opinion; the folks who work on the Java EE spec don't hang out at this forum, since JBI isn't part of Java EE either.
I suggest you look at appservers that support JBI. That will allow you to plug in a BPEL engine, deploy your BPEL straightforwardly, and not have to deal with extra complications. It will also give you a good J2EE/BPEL interoperation story that is easily extended to other technologies for defining business logic, accessing communications protocols, transformation technologies, business rules engines, etc.
Meanwhile, you might want to ping the spec lead on JSR 207, and find out where "Process Definition for Java" (sometimes called BPEL/J) is. It sounds like a JSR you might be interested in participating in, perhaps.

SPEC CINT2006 Confusion

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for