Specify rules for APC value takeover

Hi everybody,
When i tried to specify the rules for takeover for depn area 10 (MACRS/ACRS Tax Depreciation - Local Currency) as 01 (which is the legal depreciation) , the following information is displayed , thereby not allowing me to save the rule. Depreciation area 01 is a real depn area and not a derived one. I have checked all the relevant customisations. Please do help me out.
Message displayed:
You specified area 01 as the reference depreciation area for transferring values or depreciation terms to another depreciation area.
Area 01 is defined as a derived depreciation area. It does not manage its own values or depreciation terms. Therefore, it cannot be used to supply values or depreciation terms to another depreciation area.
Regards

TCODE:OAE1
TCODE:OADB
Check the dep.area - 01 is selected with "real depreciation area" check box.
(real depreciation area - stores the dep.values, derived dep.are - not real depreciation area and not stores the values, is only statistical)
if you tick the check box your problem will solve -- withou having values how can you transfer to others
VVR

Similar Messages

Specify transfer of APC values

Hi all,
Should I use "Specify Transfer of APC Values" for Tax depreciation area and cost accounting depreciation.
Regards,
ram

What is exactly your issue?

Device Collention query rule for registry value

Hi,
How do i create a device collection query in SCCM2012 R2 wizard rule to find the criterion type for a regisrty value data type.?
For example: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanServer\Parameters\srvcomment
Value name: srvcomment
Value Data: ABCD

when you run RegToMof and point to the correct key, there are three tabs, one says ConfigMgr12 another says CnfgMgr07 and SMS2003. You want the ConfMgr12 tab.
From that tab there are two tabs below that, a configuration.mof tab and a to import in ...... tab
navigate to the key you want to include
As you navigate both tabs are populated with data. You need to copy the contents of the Configuration.mof tab and paste it in your configuration.mof files on your site server, which is located
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Configuration Manager\inboxes\clifiles.src\hinv
by default. Backup the original in case you mess things up.
The other tab, to import in Admin/Agent settings...., you need to copy the contents of that tab, and created a .mof file (which is just a regular text file), name is whatever.mof. The go to your config man console, and import the .mof file into your
agent settings/hardware inventory/set classes (you'll see the button in hardware inventory)

ALE : conversion rule for field value to become null

Dear experts,
I need to pass a material from one system to another with ALE. The problem is that the field marc-prctr (profit center) of this material is populated in the first system, but it does not exist in the second, so I assume transaction bd79 should be used to convert somehow the value of prctr to initial.
How can I do that??? I have already tried defining a conversion rule and assigning it to message type MATMAS, segment E1MARCM, but it did not work.
Please help.

Did you check this?<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/d3/06f6679aaf0e44b67ca6d6b58d91df/content.htm">http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/d3/06f6679aaf0e44b67ca6d6b58d91df/content.htm</a>

Rule for parameter values when portlet defined?

Am I missing something?
In Plus:
--I make a sheet in Plus that is parameterized.
--The parameter for an item whose item class has a LOV.
--I define a default value.
--I save the sheet.
In the portal:
--I define a Disco portlet.
--I edit the defaults.
--I set the parameters.
Now, here's the weird thing: The only parameter value offered is the one saved as a default value in Plus?
This certainly makes no sense at all.
This is on 9.0.2.53.12
Anyone?

Dear Ashi,
Your question falls into the paid support category which requires a more in-depth level of support. Please visit the below link to see the various paid support options that are available to better meet your needs.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?id=fh;en-us;offerprophone
Please refer to the below articles:
1) How to Handle Typed Fault Contracts in Orchestrations
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb246117.aspx>
2) A sample provided at:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/biztalk/bb608378.aspx
Thanks,
Belinda

Syndicator - Specifying delimiter for multiple-valued field

Hi,
How can (if we can, that is) we specify a delimiter to split a multi-valued source field into multiple fileds in MDM syndicator? I believe if we have <b>';'</b> as delimiter we can spilt a multi-valued field into multiple fields but what if I have <b>'/'</b> or some other character as a delimiter. Can I use that to split my multi-valued field? If yes then how?
Regards,
-Y

Hi Yasir,
I doubt whether we can anywhere specify the delimiter in syndicator from ';' to anyother as you mentioned, but otherwise the multi-valued field steps as follows...
1. right click on the field from the source grid
2. choose Split Multi-Valued Field > n
3. The Syndicator adds the split items to the Source Items grid
hope this might helps...
cheers
Alexander

While creating PO for Low value assets error

Hi Seniors,
When user creating PO for low value assets ,system throwing error as
u201CMaximum Low value amount exceeded in the case of at least one asset .u201D
Details about this issue:
1.User creating ONE PO for 8 assets as 8 line items, each line item
value below 5,000 only.
2.In this year only they created 8 new asset master records with ref to
Particular asset class(below 5,000) asset class.
3.Non Taxable item P0 (p zero).
Checked:
1. checked at AW01N, no values in each asset.
In configuration:
2. at OAYK   Specify amount for Low value assets,
   Value is 5,000 rs
3. at OAY2 selected option is u201CCheck maximum amount with qtyu201D
I created POu2019S for below 2 options
1   Value based maximum amount check
2   Check maximum amount with quantity
But same error.
Note:
In development server i created some POu2019s like user creating in
Production server but no error in Dev server,
Plz guide me.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
I think you are using a single asset master record in all your line items in the PO.
If you use individual asset master record for each line item in the PO, you issue might solve.
Post again for further queries.
Thanks,
Srinu.

Parallel accounting - different APC values for different ledgers

< MODERATOR: Please don't post in multiple forums. Message locked. Please review the [forum rules|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/home/rulesofEngagement]>
Hi all,
I defined the following 3 depreciation areas:
01 - IFRS - posts in realtime / target ledger grp = 0L
30 - local - posts depreciation only / target ledger grp = Z1
60 - difference 30-01 - posts only APC directly / target ledger grp = Z1
0L contains leading ledger (IFRS)
Z1 contains parallel ledger (local)
Then I defined a new transaction type for acquisition (e.g. Z10) and limited it to depreciation area 01. This transaction type I wanted to use for acquisitions which are relevant only for IFRS ledger.
Now I post an $1000 invoice using transaction F-90 (acquisition with vendor). I select posting key 70, in the field Account I select an asset under construction and I choose the transaction type Z10.
After proceeding this step I would expect that the amount $1000 would be posted only in IFRS ledger. But it is not, it is posted in both ledgers.
If I want to run the transaction ASKB (APC values posting), I get an error message "Account 14001 in company code 0100 cannot be directly posted to". The account 14001 is the acquisition account for the AuC used when posting the invoice.
Why I get this message? How can I get the values posted correctly (i.e. only to IFRS ledger)?
Thanks for all ideas
Zbynek

Did you get a solution to your issue.?
Would you please mind sharing your solution ?
I am in a similar situation where we have area 01 as local Gapp and area 15 as IFRS.
we want to have 01 posted to leading and 15 to nonleading ledgers.
thanks.

Error:Data inconsistency: Area 10 for value takeover is missing

Hi,
I am posting AUC settlement thro T code AIBU from one AUC asset to other asset and i am getting below error.
Data inconsistency: Area 10 for value takeover is missing
Message no. AAPO 105
Diagnosis
According to its formula, depreciation area 33 is defined for mandatory takeover of values from depreciation area 10. However, depreciation area 10 was not posted during the current transaction (chart of depreciation PE1). This is not allowed.
Procedure
Check the specifications for the current transaction type.
I do not understand why this error message is appearing.
When i checked both the asset master does not have Depreciation area 10. But it activated in configuration. Is it possible to add the dep area 10 in asset master now?
regards
Suri

Hi,
I tried executing AFBN for Dep area 10, system throwing pop up message as"Define depreciation area correctly". The detailed information in POP is as given below.
Define depreciation area correctly
Message no. AU008
Diagnosis
Depreciation area 10, which you want to create as a new depreciation area in chart of depreciation PE1, has no depreciation area defined for value takeover. This may be be correct for normal operation, however for the purposes of creating a new depreciation in the productive system, you have to enter a depreciation area whose values are used as base values for the new area.
Procedure
In FI-AA Customizing, please check the value takeover rules for the depreciation area you are creating.
In config, there are totally 4 dep areas, 01,10,31 & 33 and which has defined as default dep areas in asset master, but when i try to create a new asset asset, in dep area tab, the default dep area are appearing only 01, 31 & 33. Dep area 10 is not showing,
Please tell me what could be reason, for throwing error in AFBN and why dep area 10 is not appearing while creating new asset master.
regards
Suri

APC Value and Plan Value for an Asset.

HI Gurus,
I am developing a report where I have to display the APC value and Plan value of an Asset.Can anyone pls give an insight how to find this for the Asset.

Hi,
why don´t you use the logical database ADA which most of the FI-AA standard reports do? The logical database is a service to get this information without developing all the READ information and translation by yourself, especially when talking about mid-year-reporting, consistence checks, etc..
If you decide to use ADA, then the events GET ANLA0, GET ANLAV and GET ANLCV are from interest for you for information about APC and planned/posted depreciation value.
Regards,
Markus

Data inconsistency: Area 30 for value takeover is missing

Hi Experts,
I am trying to enter Asset Transaction: Asset Sale Without Customer (ABAON) but I am getting the error below:
Data inconsistency: Area 30 for value takeover is missing
Message no. AAPO105
Diagnosis
According to its formula, depreciation area 31 is defined for mandatory takeover of values from depreciation area 30. However, depreciation area 30 was not posted during the current transaction (chart of depreciation MY01). This is not allowed.
Procedure
Check the specifications for the current transaction type.
I have checked OAYZ configuration. Area 30 does not have a 'Deactivate' tick on it. What does the Deactivate tick mean? If I need to change and tick it, how do I so since it is grayed out?
I hope someone can help me out with this.
Thanks,
Josef

Hi Josef,
This might be due to new depreciation area addition recently, is it ?
For the message in AFBN,
Depreciation area that you entered in chart of depreciation cannot be processed, as this program can only process real depreciation areas and not derived areas.
If it is a derived depreciation area then this program not works.
Based on initial error message it appears 31 is deriving values from 30. You might have run AFBN for area 30. Please check what the parameters in area 30. Some time dep.area defined as derived can be a real dep.area if it is the differences derived value from other dep.areas.
In that case please check the link back where exactly the values should come and flow.
Regards

Posting for different APC values to different Depreciation Areas

Hi All,
I am trying to manage in ECC 6.0, different APC values for different depreciation areas, i.e. APC values differ from one dep area to another. I need to post the APC to GL only (i.e. for the 01 i.e. Book Depreciation area). For the remaining depreciation areas for the purposes of reporting I need to maintain different APC values.
One way to achieve this is by maintaining Parallel ledger. Is there any other way this can be achieved.
Thanks in advance
Krishna

Hi,
Use the trnasaction ABSO and clik in the button Dep. Area.
Now you can fill in the value by depreciation area. (when this is set up) use the Trans act type 100
Paul

Different APC value for different ledgers

Hi,
we maintain two ledgers, one for IFRS, the other for local accounting. Considering some type of assets, we need to post different APC values to the IFRS ledger and the local ledger. How can this be done?
thanks in advance,
Zbynek

Hi Arup,
Yes, absoutely - you can use different RD for the same VRF on different PEs. In fact, if you have chosen to use the PE_IP_Address:Customer format of the RD then logically, the same VRF on different PEs will have different RDs because the PE addresses themselves are different.
There is no obvious advantage or disadvantage to having the same or a different RD per the same VRF on different PEs. The RD is a tool that allows BGP to differentiate between identical prefixes from different VRFs on a single router. However, the value of RD has no influence on how the prefix will be assigned to a particular VRF on the destination PE. For this, route targets are always used.
There is one specific use of different RDs: Advertising multiple paths to a single multihomed VRF site. Because to BGP, the entire value of <RD><Prefix><Netmask> is used in the best path selection algorithm, if two PEs connected to the same VRF site used the same RD, destination PEs and route reflectors would choose and advertise only one of them (remember: BGP always selects and advertises only a single best path). With different RDs, destination PEs and route reflectors see formally different NLRIs, and they perform the best path selection for each of them individually even though the actual <Prefix><Netmask> is the same.
However, for simple VRF deployments, having a unique or identical RD on two PEs for the same VRF makes no significant difference.
I hope other friends here will add their own thoughts about this.
Best regards,
Peter

Derivation rule for value fied

can any one tel me how we define derivation rules for value fields. is it posible to put derivation and how it
will effect.
Thanks&Regards
Amar

Hi
In COPA Derivation rules you can only map characteristic.. i mean you can derive only Characteristic values not for Value fields.
Value fields are normally mapped with SD conditions or GL accounts.
If you want to manipulate or recalculate the values flowing into value fields you need to use enhancements.
In this step you can set up system enhancements which are not supported in the standard R/3 System. These so-called "standard enhancements" can be used in the following areas of Profitability Analysis as below.
Derivation of characteristic values        (COPA0001)
Valuation                                    (COPA0002)
Direct postings to profitability segments (COPA0003)
Currency translation                        (COPA0004)
Actual data update                          (COPA0005)
Hope this helps
Regards
Venkat

Data not coming from DOE to Mobile After defining Rule for device attribute

Hi All,
I have created a DO and rule for it.In case of Bulk Rule for all definition when i triggere extract from Portal then all the data comes to outbound queue but when i define rule for Device attribute then no data comes to my Outboun queue.Here is the scenario what i am doing :
1. I have order header in my backend which has a field named "Work_Center" and this will be criteria field.
2. In CDS table i have all the records for all the work center.
3. Now in RMM under customized , i have added an attribute named "Work_center".
4. Now i defined a rule with Device attribute mapping and activated the rule.
5. Now on Portal i assigned this data object and in the device attribute tab i assigned the value(this value exist in CDS table for few orders) of a Work center to the attribute "Work_Center" .
6. Then i triggrere extract but its Outbound queue is empty, what could be the reason.
Is my approach is correct
Regards,
Abhishek

Hi Abhishek,
You can check one ore thing, after you have performed all the steps till step 5, i.e. just before triggering
extract. Check if the AT table for ur DO has entries based on the criteria specified by you...
1. In the workbench click on the Data Object, and then right click and select "View Metadata".
2. Select Distribution Model tab.
3. Now select your DO's Association table.
4. For the input field DEVICE ID specify your corresponing device id,and also for status field specify it
as "I" and execute
If there are any entries now in the AT table, and on triggering extract if they are not coming to the
outbound Q there is some EXTRACT Q blocked. And is there were no entries in the AT then the rule
specified is not the satifying.
Thanks,
Swarna
Now if you have entries w

Specify rules for APC value takeover

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for