SpeedGrade CC (7.0.1) Update released today

Hi everyone,
The SpeedGrade CC (7.0.1) update was released today. The new version brings Mercury Transmit support for Bluefish and Matrox video I/O cards, support for 48 KHz audio output, and a number of other improvements and bug fixes.
You can read the release notes on the SpeedGrade blog here: http://adobe.ly/13YKJEY
Please post any questions about this release here, on the SpeedGrade forum where more people will see them!
Eric

I don't think so. It depend more of Blackmagic that Adobe. This is the answer to my request at Blackmagic:
"The current version of the driver does not support Adobe SpeedGrade. This may be added in the future, however I do not have information as to whether this will be introduced"
Please, ask a request at Blackmagic.

Similar Messages

  • IPhoto 8.0.4 Update released today

    iPhoto 8.0.4 Update was posted today on Apple's download site. This is what is said about it:
    "This update addresses a rarely encountered issue involving photos imported into a previous version that could affect overall stability, and corrects references to a few points of interest and location names that were labelled incorrectly."
    Haven't installed it as yet because the servers are glacially slow and the update is large, 102MB. Current download time remaining is 34 minutes where is usually would complete in about 2-3 minutes for that size a file. It seems all of Apple's servers are having trouble lately.

    Thanks Toad,
    It amazes iMe how some of you figure this complex set of steps out.
    In receipts, I do see Flip for Mac. No iPhoto was there.
    *- iLife 09 pkg is there. Does it goes to trash as well?
    receipts/list
    RemoteDesktopClient.pkg
    RAWCameraUpdate.pkg
    QuickTime76_Leopard.pkg
    QuickTime762_Leopard.pkg
    Keystone.pkg
    iWork09_Update2.pkg
    iTunesX.pkg
    iTunesAccess.pkg
    iLifeSoundEffects_Loops.pkg
    iLifeCookie.pkg
    iLife '09.pkg
    iDVD_704.pkg
    googleearthplugin.pkg
    GarageBandExtraContent.pkg
    FrontRowUpdate2.1.7.pkg
    Flip4Mac Web Plugins.pkg
    Flip4Mac QuickTime Components.pkg
    db
    CoreFP.pkg
    BSD.pkg
    boms
    AppleMobileDeviceSupport.pkg
    AppleIntermediateCodec.pkg
    Aperture2.1.3Update.pkg
    AirPortUtility.pkg
    Adobe Flash Player.pkg
    I recall refraining from loading Flip for Mac in the first place.
    I thought it was trouble.
    I'll do follow up after the Holiday
    Thanks'

  • Podcast app v. 2.0.1 update released today, but still not working

    Several months ago, I purchased two new iOS devices and have not been able to use Podcasts on either device. I spoke with a level 2 Apple tech support specialist over the course of several days trying to resolve the issues and he eventually concluded that the bugs were in the programming and said he would pass the information along to the engineers.
    After many months of being unable to use Podcasts, I was excited to see a new update for the Podcast app.  Unfortunately, it appears the major issues plaguing the app have not been addressed.
    Is anyone else able to get this app to work reliably?  I try copying/syncing podcasts, and you can watch them copy over and see them displayed in iTunes, but they do not display in the Podcast app on the device.
    Can anyone else confirm this behavior? Is there any procedure that will get the app working correctly? I have tried removing all podcasts, as well as removing, redownloading, reinstalling the Podcast app, but so far no good. Is there a third party app that will allow me to play podcasts under iOS 7.0.4?

    I have managed to get the Podcast app to work somewhat reliably as follows. Note I haven't tried 2.0.1 yet so I don't know if they broke it further (if that's even possible) -- or perhaps they will buck the current Apple trend and actually fix something.
    1. Forget synching with iTunes -- it's completely broken. I subscribe to the podcasts on iTunes but don't download on iTunes. Subscribing on iTunes is useful because it doesn't seem to "lose" episodes the way the Podcast app does, so when the Podcast app loses episodes (discussed below) I can still see them on iTunes so I can retrieve them again.
    2. I subscribe to all my podcasts in the Podcast app. I set them to download automatically and keep all unplayed. I leave the sort and play options at the default of Sort Newest On Top and Play Oldest First.
    3. I don't use My Stations except for On-The-Go when I want to listen to episodes from different podcasts -- just add each episode to OTG in the order you want to listen to them.
    4. If I have multiple episodes of a single podcast I want to listen to, I just open it in My Podcasts and start the oldest one playing and they will play in the proper order.
    5. You can stream a podcast on iTunes -- that seems to work, and it may even remember the playback position. When I'm at home I Air Play to my Apple TV from my iPhone.
    6. The Podcast app will sometimes discard unplayed downloaded podcasts. Resetting the iPhone usually triggers this but sometimes a simple power off+on will do it as well.  To get them back, you need to open each podcast in My Podcasts and tap the Add Old Episodes. Lo and behold there are the "disappeared" podcasts still marked as unplayed. Just add each one back and it download again.

  • Has anyone downloaded the new update released today? My battery is going crazy,  down from 100% to 80 in less than ah hour

    Anyone else having this issue?

    I'm not having that issue.  Have you restored as a new device?

  • New OS update released today

    Can anybody tell me what it does? Just downloaded it and I can't see the difference...

    The answer to my question got posted on another site. Thought some of you might be interested.
    http://forums.crackberry.com/blackberry-playbook-f222/blackberry-tablet-os-v1-0-7-2942-available-now...

  • Snow Leopard 10.6.4 release today includes Safari 5

    Hi
    Safari 5 is included in the 10.6.4 update released today - available in Software Update.
    If you have not installed Safari 5 and you prefer to stay with your current version of Safari, do not upgrade to 10.6.4,

    OK, I have not yet installed the 10.6.4 update. I am following the advice to wait a couple of days.
    Also, I am still in the process of *trying to figure out which external hard drive to buy so I can run Time Machine.*
    I am now running Safari 5, fairly successfully, after the initial problem with my ISP DSL modem, which works after I changed the DSN numbers.
    My question is, *since Safari 5 is working fast* (except very occasionally I can't get to a website, such as when I tried to login to this site, initially neither Firefox or Safari would get me to the login site) for me, *would it probably be "safe" to download the 10.6.4 update?*
    Or should I just keep the 10.6.4 update waiting for my manual approval and wait until I get my external hard drive. I am thinking that Apple would not have made the 10.6.4 available if we Mac owners shouldn't be downloading it.

  • I've updated Firefox today and unfortunately my previous bookmarks disappeared . how can I retrieve my previous bookmark list?

    I updated Firefox today and all my previous bookmark list disappeared. I tried to use the "import and backup" tab and followed the directions of the Firefox page to backup and restore my previous bookmarks. Unfortunately, nothing happened. Could you please help me with possible advice/guidance on how to resolve this? This is the second time this happens, always when Firefox receives updates..

    You appear to be using the Developer Edition / Aurora pre-release version, which creates a new Profile upon installation or update on the Aurora channel. Open '''Options > General''' and tick or untick the box at the top which says '''Allow Firefox Developer Edition and Firefox to run at the same time'''. Once you restart ''[as told to]'' you will "toggle" over to the other Profile, where your bookmarks are - ''hopefully''.
    If you don't like "updates", why are you using an '''alpha-2''' version that receives an update every day?

  • Anyone tried the new ARD Client just released today (2-1-2012)

    Has anyone tried installing and running the new ARD Client released today, Feb. 1, 2012?  The info provided by Apple about this update seems to be kind of thin in exactly what was changed.3.5.2,  It lists only screen sharing and controlling a computer with two displays.  If you have installed it what have you found as both improved or degraded.  What OS do you have installed on your client systems?  Any changes specific to Lion or Snow Leopard?

    Today I connected to a remote server running Mac OS X Server 10.6.8 and ran the updater for Apple Remote Desktop 3.5.2.
    It successfully completed and I was able to re-connect. Unfortunately I can no longer "drag and drop". When I pick up an icon, for example, I cannot release it (drop). My controlling computer is running OS X 10.7.3.
    I may try to revert to the earlier version of ARD if possible. This is a pretty big problem for me; so I'm trying to figure out what is wrong with this updater. It may be that a reboot will fix the problem; but I have to wait for a convenient time to reboot my server. I need to also test connecting from a 10.6.8 workstation instead of 10.7.3, as this may be a "Lion controlling Snow Leopard" issue.
    Either way, I would be wary of this updater.

  • New version released today!

    Howdy...
    I saw on the blog a while back that the NEXT version of Premiere was due to be released today...
    Has anyone heard anything or seen an update?
    Best,
    Ben

    Thanks... I tried a search, but obviously not looking in the right place or using the right terms. Sorry for the unncessary post...
    Of course, anyone else who searches here will now find this! Yay!
    Biggles... next decaf is on me!
    B.

  • 10.3.9 users....Camino 1.6.9 update released!

    For those 10.3.9 users using Camino you may be interested in the 1.6.9 update just released today. You can find the update at:
    http://caminobrowser.org
    This update consists of new phishing and malware protection for your Camino browser. It also contains stability improvements.
    LS
    PS. I am not connected with nor do I receive any compensation for my recommendation of Camino Browser 1.6.9. I am only posting this information as an aide to users of 10.3.9 that may have an interest in the latest developement with the Camino browser.

    LS:
    Just curious, are you using it on your 10.4 machine?
    I'm not sure what "it" is. Am I using Camino 1.6.9 on the Pismo? No, I haven't been on it since the update came out.
    Am I using Password1 on the Pismo. No, again, as I have yet to install it. I don't use the Pismo for a lot of stuff anymore, so password security is not as important.
    Am I using Menu Switch on the Pismo. No, again. I use the Pismo only for a limited number of things, so I have not spent a lot of time updating it.
    So, whatever "it" is, the answer is No.
    cornelius

  • HT201442 I've tried everything to fix my iPad after updating it today 10.9.2-now it is in recovery mode - please help ????

    I've tried everything to fix my iPad after updating it today 10.9.2-now it is in recovery mode - please help ????

    1. Turn off iPad
    2. Turn on computer and launch iTunes (make sure you have the latest version of iTune)
    3. Plug USB cable into computer's USB port
    4. Hold Home button down and plug the other end of cable into docking port.
    DO NOT RELEASE BUTTON until you see picture of iTunes and plug
    5. Release Home button.
    ON COMPUTER
    6. iTunes has detected iPad in recovery mode. You must restore this iPad before it can be used with iTunes.
    7. Select "Restore iPad"...
    Note:
    1. Data will be lost if you do not have backup
    2. You must follow step 1 to step 4 VERY CLOSELY.

  • Will QuickTime 7.1.5 (released TODAY) fix the ColorSync Bug?

    I just read on the iDVD forum that QT 7.1.5 was released today. Sure enough, it showed up on my Software Update! Can anyone test iPhoto 6.0.5 with QT 7.1.5 on a PPC Mac to see if it corrects the color profile bug?
    or am I only dreaming?

    Ha ha ha.

  • Exclusive update release for Adobe Cloud customers

    Excuse me, Adobe.
    Don't get this wrong, I personally have nothing against Adobe. Please know and realize that Adobe probably don't realize this, or simply don't have a heart to realize this by now. Adobe actually losing some valuable registered lifetime 'diehard' Adobe customers like other creative professionals and myself.
    Yesterday I learned that Adobe released exclusive update release only for Adobe Creative Cloud customers with Illustrator's new package update. I find that very ironic approach, because I know that diehard Adobe Illustrator customers have request for it for years. Adobe basically ignored us, creative professionals, instead of us, focusing on Adobe Creative Cloud customers.
    Rest assured, Adobe Master Collection CS6 is more likely my final upgrade purchase. It was a big slap in my face. I know that it is not just me, knowing that many other creative professionals are upset as I am.
    Don't get me wrong, I wholeheartedly am (now was) a lifetime diehard Adobe customer.
    Dear Adobe, just tell me if I am wrong. I just cannot justify the cost benefit analysis on advantage of Adobe Creative Cloud, where it is more of "renting" while many other creative professionals including myself prefer traditional way of upgrading through Adobe online store just as in the past and at present time. Many of us prefer "traditional" way of "owning" Adobe Creative Suite apps rather than 'renting' apps. In a long run, by owning traditional app/purchase do have super duper advantage over Cloud in terms of real cost of doing business. While traditional customers like myself still own Adobe apps even if when Adobe decides no longer support, we still own the legacy versions regardless.
    So, what happens if one day, out of blue, I fear that Adobe eventually realize that Adobe Creative Cloud is not viable or feasible to continue. That will certainly make some customers not happy. What happens to traditional customers like creative professionals and myself spent huge amount of investment in traditional qualified upgrades, and then switched to Cloud.. then one day Adobe decide not to support Adobe Creative Cloud.. what does this means to traditional customers like myself owned versions of serialization numbers over the years - down in the drain and Adobe Creative Cloud 'temporary' annual serial number no longer viable, and force us to pay FULL traditional license all over again. In that case, that is where I am dealing with this concern. I just cannot possibly trust Adobe on that one. I do have huge benefit of doubt on that one.
    For example, with Adobe decided to invest some of its resources developed new applications such as Adobe Flash Catalyst and few others in Adobe Creative Suite CS5. When Adobe released CS6, Adobe dropped Flash Catalyst. That is one of example on why I do have benefit of doubt on long term viability and feasibility of Adobe Creative Cloud.
    Please listen to us, creative professionals out of our concerns.
    If Adobe refuse to listen, include us in that respect, so be it. It is possible that Adobe eventually be losing many lifetime, diehard Adobe creative professionals.
    To be honest, I am very disappointed with Adobe's attitude toward creative professionals' being diehard lifetime support and invested lot of our time, tools, and skills and everything... time and money. It is all down in the drain. Thanks!
    Have a fabulous day!

    And customers fall for it like suckers.
    Software development during the emergence of a new category has always been lucrative. A small handful of developers with a good idea sweat blood for a couple years building the core application. Once it exists, delivery is cheap and profit-per-sale is high. Users buy licenses for several hundreds of dollars each. Each new license sale costs next to nothing to replicate in terms of manufacturing. It's all marketing, packaging, and distrubution. Disks are copied and printed for less than $1 each. Printed manuals, of course, may cost $20 or so, depending on color, quality, etc. There is real overhead, of course, in developing good content for manuals.
    When all this stuff was new software titles used to cost less, but shipped with installation disks and thorough printed manuals, and a set of added-value extras, like utilities, fonts, clipart. And new version improvements were quite significant and innovative.
    But once the software category "matures," with each version, the prices go up; the bundled "extras" become fewer. The focus shifts toward continually look for ways to cheap-out on the customers in order to "improve" the margin for the stockholders, and "milk" the increasingly archaic and mundane software for all that can be got out of it. One way this is done is by turning real value into mere perceived value. Adobe is the worst offender in this regard.
    Print manuals have become pay-extra, or non-existent. It astounds me that in the much-ballyhooed age of "information at your fingertips" the ondisk local help has become increasingly difficult and tedious to access. Now, the default behavior of the Help menu has even been modified to disuade users from accessing local PDF versions of the documentation to coerce them to go online for help files access (this from the company that is highly dependent upon PDF). Slow, tedious, and non-contextual as it is, PDF was bad enough. Having to go to Adobe's crappy "community help" system is ridiculous.
    This is all promoted, of course, as "immediate access to continual improvement." And customers fall for it like suckers.
    Look at the increasingly innane questions that occur  daily in this Forum. Newcomers ask the most basic questions, making it obvious they haven't even tried to read page one of the documentation. I've been at this stuff since the beginning. It didn't used to be this way.
    Are they all lazy dolts? No. Documentation has become less accessible and less thorough.
    Next, Adobe turns the online documentation essentially into blogs. "Live feedback"? "Continual improvement"? Baloney. Beginners clutter what should be authoritative documentation with innane comments. Questions get transferred to the User Forums, where Adobe sluffs off its responsibility for product support to its users; which more often than not turns into a time-wasting process of the blind leading the blind.
    Of course, only a mere mention of the term "tech support" will suffice. Everyone knows what thas become.
    Once you've eliminated the costs of printing, packaging, and delivering disks and documentation, and turned everything into electronic downloads (causing each customer hours of downtime--often even days futzing around with Adobe's horrible installers), what's next? Stockholders still want increased margin.
    Software by subscription and web-centric automation--while still increasing prices, of course--has long been the holy grail of software developers. This is true of all the biggies, including Microsoft, and of course Adobe. But how do you pull it off? How do you convince the suckers?
    Releasing new features to the buzzword "cloud" before making them available to perpetual licensees will be Adobe's attempt to "sweeten the pot" to con those who buy into the software subscription scheme. Time will tell how successful the ruse is for Adobe.
    The truth is, though, in terms of actual quality of the product, (especially Illustrator) nothing has changed for the better. Look at the very features that we who choose to stay with the relative safety of a traditional license are so upset about: Bundle for output? Export embedded images?
    People, how archaic, how old, how yesterdecade's news is that? This is "quick development" that can only be delivered by the "cloud"? Give me a break.
    It's utterly laughable, as Illustrator's cobby, clumsy, over-glorified, under-delivered, decades-late-to-the-game delevery of practical functionality always has been. So what's the big rush anyway for features that are already literal decades late? Sheesh, guys, Illustrator is not the only game in town.
    Consider: Since the release of CS6, how many posts have you forum regulars seen expressing excitement over the precious few actually new features, like grads-on-strokes? How many stunning examples of use of that feature have you seen users post?
    By comarison, how many posts have you seen on complaints about performance and buggy behavior? And proportionally how many are still the endless stream of repeats of the same old questions from newcomers trying to make sense out of Illustrator's uncomparably unintuitive, cluttered, and confused interface? I see the latter largely increasing. And I take that as clear indication that Adobe's treatment of "newfangled" documentation is not working. (And, of course, that Illustrator's interface is still as hideously unintutitve as it has always been.)
    Meanwhile, for the first time in too many years, I actually experienced again that new-purchase satisfaction of money-well-spent when I opened the Corel Graphic Design X6 Suite package to find a full-color manual with a hard-bound cover no less! Upgrade cost for anyone with a copy two full versions old? $200. Comes with 1000 OpenType fonts, huge clipart collection, truly useful utilities, and alot more.
    I still get a thrill out of every new release of Xara Designer Pro. So much elegant functionality, such clean-running speed, so stunning results possible from that tidy, inviting, intuitive interface in so affordably-priced and fun-to-use application.
    Meanwhile, Adobe upgrades have become more burden than pleasure. I actually dread them, especially having been suckered into the whole "Master Collection" thing. CS6 still sits on my desk uninstalled. I just dread having to mess with it.
    Oh, but James! That's why you should buy into "the creative cloud"!
    Well, don't hold your breath, bucko. If I decide to let CS7 or whatever just slide right by, I'll still be able to keep running the version I've got--without sending a monthly check to Adobe.
    These days--when so many younsters who have never swung a hammer at a nail actually try to rationalize renting over home ownership; and when so many middle-agers rationalize making perpetual interest payments for the instant gratification of driving a new car every year--who knows; the "creative cloud" sham may actually succeed.
    But not with me. Instead of watching money automatically fly out the window by itself, I'll be chuckling away, using whichever of my usual collection of 2D vector drawing programs I feel most advantageous--or most fun--for the task at hand.
    JET

  • How do I tell what version (update / release level) of version 6 has been applied to my system?

    Question
    How do I tell what version (update / release level) of version 6 has been applied to my system? I have applied several different release levels to version 6 of FF but all the about feature tells me is Version 6.0. no version! This seems to be a change in the way updates are handled. Is that a bending because of the speed of which you're pushing out updates and new releases?
    contact me if you need something more
    ''deleted email address''

    @cchur <br />
    Nope, I never used Chrome, but I did try Chromium on my Windows desktop PC for a few months last year. I got tired of the Google updater. exe running all the time and Google's method of doing updates, so it's gone. I do have Chromium on my Linux EeePC since last summer, but Ubuntu handles all updates and gives the user the capability to accept or deny, any or all updates - much more to my liking, similar to the way Mozilla does it. I don't like software developers forcing to update until I am ready to proceed.
    There's a lot more about this new Fast Release system, than just the lack of visible version numbers, that I don't like. The Nightly, Aurora, Beta, & Release sequence is dumb with the way it changes the version numbers. I prefer installing (for instance) what will become version 7 and have that installation progress thru the 4 stages, instead. Now it's like Nightly going from 7 to 8, Aurora going from 6 to 7, and Beta doing - hell, I won't know if it becomes a Release or if it just dies and I will have to install the Release version myself. ''Quite honestly I don't care, because I don't think this new "system" is going to last too long without major modifications. Too damn many users are so pissed off, that when Firefox starts losing large numbers of users, Chrome keeps growing and eventually passes Firefox in number of users and market share of usage - Mozilla will wake up and see the "light" and change back to the way things used to be done, to a certain extent.''
    I also dislike the UI changes in 4/5/6/7 enough that I am still using Firefox 3.6 for almost everything and Firefox 2.0.0.20 for the rest. I have been setting my toolbars up almost like Mozilla did for Firefox 4, since Firefox '''0.7''' in 2003 and I haven't come up with a workable combination of mods and extensions to configure Firefox to look and work the way I have been doing for almost 8 years now.

  • Updated pages today but when I try to open a document I created I get a message saying you need new version, but i have the new version! So frustrating - HELP!

    Updated Pages today - created a document. Went back few hours later to send it as email attachment - got a message saying Pages needs to be updated to open. Went to Mac app page and it said it was updated. Document won't open - what do I do???? Keeps saying to upgrade but it is upgraded - ARGH!

    Here is a possible solution.
    You should still have Pages 4.3, the old version, on your computer in Applications>iWork09. If you have the old Pages 4.3 running when you open the file, Pages 4.3 will warn you that you need to update because the new Pages uses a different file format. You can open the file in two ways.
    Quit Pages 4.3, then open the file.
    Right-click the file and choose to open the file in Pages 5.0.
    I hope this helps.

Maybe you are looking for

  • HP LaserJet 1018 not printing landscape on index cards

    I regularly print on 3 x 5 index cards with this printer.  In fact, this is the reason I purchased the printer.  Just this morning, I am suddenly unable to print landscape on it.  Any file set up in landscape will run through the printer and come out

  • JNDI lookup on a specific server node

    Hi experts I am facing the following issue, we are loading data from ECC tables on PI JAVA memory to improve performance at runtime, this is done by a JCO, it works fine within one Java node. But when we tested it in Productive system (with 2 java no

  • How to disable sort in inputlistofvalues popup

    I'm building custom bpm task list using jdeveloper 11.1.1.7 and in this page i've added input list of values this input list of values comes from view object but I've changed its value to my xsd element to save returned value in this elemnt Problem h

  • Album artwork not displaying for all albums in Coverflow view

    Very interesting problem I'm having. All of my music has album artwork assigned to it and can clearly be seen in the preview pane at the bottom left of the iTunes window. However, not all the albums show up in the new Coverflow feature in iTunes 7. I

  • Can Oracle Lite be installed on RHEL4

    hi Can Oracle Lite be installed on RHEL4 and 11.5.10 EBS database? Thanks JIL