SPL block at PO in GTS - GR creation is allowing in ECC

Hi All,
SPL functionality is working fine for SD cycly but not for MM cycle.
SD process: Sales order created, blocked in GTS automatically. When we try to create delivery in ECC before releasing order in GTS, the system showing error. That means delivery can not be created, fine.
MM process: Purchase order created and blocked in GTS automatically. But Goods recipt creation is allowed in ECC before releasing the SPL block in GTS for that PO.
In SD process we have assigned 911 routine in copy control from order to delivery to stop delivery creation for blocked sales order.
Same way do we have any user exit or routines for stopping GR creation for blocked PO's.
Please let us know your ideas.
Regards,
Lakshmikanth

Hi Lakshmikanth,
Can you please explain , how did you prevent system to create Delivery for Blocked PO?
we have similar requirement for the client.
Regards
Mayank

Similar Messages

SPL block when changing the Address manually at Sales order level

Hello all, I hope every one doing well
I am facing one problem in SAP system, when I am chanigng the Partner address at sales order level , system giving the SPL block , without screening even though the customer is a good customer.
I checked in Img: GTS -> SAP Compliance Management->"Sanctioned Party List Screening" Service->Control Settings for "Sanctioned Party List Screening" Service->Sanctioned Party List Screening Strategy for Customs Docs tested with as " Status check of unchanged Addresses( Partner Address) and New check of changed Addresses.
I didn't find any difference. Sales order getting block for the above cases when changing the Address at Sales/Create document level.
Please let me know how to resolve it.
Is it related to configuration if yes how ? pr
do we have any OSS Notes to Rescreen the Sales orders with compliace even though changing the Address at sales order level ( ship to party address changes like Name, city, email id, of fax )?
or
do we need to do the Enhancement for Rescreening when changing the ship to party adress (changes like Name, city, email id, of fax )
manually at sales order level ?
Thanks in Advance
NVR

hello Sameer,
1. Whether your Embargo service is activated for the Country of Plant from which your order is getting shipped. -- Yes I have activated the Country under Embargo list.
2. Whether the partner function for which you changing the county detail has been added in into the Partner group which is assigned to Embargo services.( GTS)-- Assinged the Sold to Party ( AG) for PGEMB2- Partner group
3. Whether the country which u putting as Embargo has been maintianed under Embargo country list,
- yes
What I am doing exactly is , I am creating sales order with US customer master , but I am chaning the Country Key as Embargo country ( Ex: CU, SY, IR) at VA01 , or VA02 level Sales order header Partner tab level for Sold to party address ( changing only country key as embargo country) , not to ship to party ( ship to party still US country key only), at that time system not blocking the sales order as embargo.
please let me know if any once come across this sistuation..
Thanks in advance
NVR

SPL Block when manually changing address detail form r3

I have a strange situation:
We have completed an upgrade to GTS 7.1 - SSLLEG SP 15
We are using R3 4.7 - PI 2004_1_470 SP 0015 PI_BASIS 2005_1_620 SP 0014
When we create a sales order with reference to another sales document - and manually change the address, the RFC sends the sales order inofrmation to GTS - and screens normally
When we create a sales order without reference - and manually change the address to a partner - the RFC sends teh sales order information to GTS - but the partner(s) changed are identified as blocked due to "Manual change - and found on boycott list"
When I SPL screen this on the GTS side - it proposes release - without considering the blocked partner(s). It does not appear on the blocked documents list - but when you display doc - it shows these partner(s) blocked
If I send this sales order over using the r3 push program (/SAPSLL/SD0A_DISTRIBUTE_R3) - the order screens properly
The configuration is set to SYNCHRONOUS SCREENING for the document item category
Any insight here would be helpful

hello Sameer,
1. Whether your Embargo service is activated for the Country of Plant from which your order is getting shipped. -- Yes I have activated the Country under Embargo list.
2. Whether the partner function for which you changing the county detail has been added in into the Partner group which is assigned to Embargo services.( GTS)-- Assinged the Sold to Party ( AG) for PGEMB2- Partner group
3. Whether the country which u putting as Embargo has been maintianed under Embargo country list,
- yes
What I am doing exactly is , I am creating sales order with US customer master , but I am chaning the Country Key as Embargo country ( Ex: CU, SY, IR) at VA01 , or VA02 level Sales order header Partner tab level for Sold to party address ( changing only country key as embargo country) , not to ship to party ( ship to party still US country key only), at that time system not blocking the sales order as embargo.
please let me know if any once come across this sistuation..
Thanks in advance
NVR

SPL block on address rather than name in some instances

We run GTS 7.1, and we have the requirement where in some instances (but not all), we need GTS to place a SPL block on a business partner based on the partner's street address and city rather than their name. This is a requirement because there are some "business partners" that we believe are performing inappropriate activities and are using the same address for their companies but are changing their company names often to try to avoid detection. Consequently, we want GTS to block documents when it sees a particular street address and city, no matter what the name of the business partner is. It appears that in GTS 7.1 name is a required field for a SPL record, so it does not allow us to enter a SPL record without a name. We have entered SPL records with a name such as "No Name Listed" and the addresses that should be blocked, but we received inconsistent results (i.e., it blocks on some addresses, but not for others). We also have attempted to adjust the configuration settings related to SPL screening service and modifying our SPL exclusion list, but we continue to get inconsistent results. Can anyone help me solve this issue?
Thanks,
Nate

Hi Nate -
Never had the type of requirement you have posted, but intrigued. Can't validate this in a system, but may be of some help.
Possibility 1:
Assumption:
business specific list type for screening is created.
solution:
use your minimal index threshold to your advantage in the name field...enter the minimum number of characters to prevent the system from storing a search term/index for name when defining the specific SPL entity for your requirement....as well as any other components from your control procedure that you don't want the system to evaluate.
================================================
Possibility 2
(not as ellegant as 1 & likely a performance hit):
Assumptions:
you have a separate legal regulation set up for this specific type of check; as I'm not aware of a manner to assign multiple control procedures to achieve your additional requirement.
Though I haven't implemented multiple SPL regs in a production environment, know it is possible; performance hit would need to be monitored.
solution:
Define Control Procedure for Address Comparison - set up a new one with only your screening criteria : CityAND, StreetAND ( wouldn't think you would want to match purely on City, so an OR statement would not be appropriate)
Control Settings for "Sanctioned Party List Screening" Service - Assign the new control procedure to the new reg w/all the applicable settings for your requirements....& create business specific list type for screening.
Would think that even though name is a required field in the manual Create SPL Entity, it should not actually get screened (use whatever you want); as it would not be included in the new control procedure.
feel free to give the above a try if you haven't already done so.
Regards,
Jon
Edited by: Jon Sledge on May 13, 2009 2:07 AM
Edited by: Jon Sledge on May 13, 2009 2:56 AM provided second possibility

Internal denied parties list - Records not SPL blocking despite 100% match

Hello experts,
We have started testing setting up our internal list of denied parties. So we set up a record with partner name "Alcatel-Lucent Bell NV".
Then generated and aggegated comparison terms and transferred to TREX.
To check the correct functioning I set up multiple new customer records with variations on the customer name.
Out of 6 records, as you can see only 2 got actually SPL blocked.
Only the records where is purposly changed the name (Luccent instead of Lucent, Bel instead of Bell, Alcate instead of Alcatel) blocked.
The other ones, where I used only part of the name, or mixed up the name do not block. Even the 100% copy of the name did not block the record.
My question is obviously: what can be done to fix this? We are on GTS 8.0 and these are the settings:
Thanks in advance for your help!
Corinne

Hello Corinne,
I am not sure that I am the right person to answer your question
You should ask and get the answer to your question from the business team as they are the ones that will have to use the solution at the end of the day. So the solution has to meet their needs and expectations.
In order for them to be able to choose the proper SPL screening logic, you will have to explain it to them, the pros and cons, etc...
Most probably, business will not be able to choose the SPL screening logic after you will explain them how it works, pros and cons, etc... as this too vague and theoretical...
So, from my experience, the best thing is to set up in GTS a screening logic agreed with business and then run the SPL screening against all the BPs in GTS. From there, the business will have some real life examples of BPs blocks and and he will be able to see how the system behaves and grasp a little bit of the screening logic.
Once the business is done with analyzing the results of this 1st SPL screening logic, gather from them their remarks, concerns, etc... and then propose a 2nd SPL screening logic according to their needs. Again run the SPL screening against all the BPs in GTS for the business to analyze the results of this 2nd logic and see if they are happy or not with that.
Unfortunately, there is no single answer to the best SPL screening logic as it depends on the existing BPs in the system, the quality of the data purchased, the expectations of the business, etc...
In a nutshell: it is a try and change logic untill you get to the best solution for your business.
Hope this helps.
Don't hesitate to come back should you have more questions.
Regards.
Mouaz BEN REDJEB

FM or BADI in ECC to check SPL status of partner in GTS

Hello All,
Looking for a FM/ RFC call from ECC which can check the SPL screening status of partner ( blocked or not) from GTS.
We need to check in ECC if a partner is SPL blocked in GTS or not and accordingly update a flag on partner.
Will appreciate if you can provide some guidance around it.
Regards
Amit

Hi Amit,
Check this FM,the name says it all :
/SAPSLL/SPL_BLOCKED_BP_GET_RFC
You need to provide the original source logical system, ECC partner number (customer/vendor) and type of partner
01
Partner: Vendor
02
Partner: Customer
Its RFC enabled and does pointer table translation as well, perhaps its good to double check if entries on Negative list are returned as blocked or ignored.
Results will come back in the export parameters ET_BLOCKED_PARTNER and ET_RESULT.
Hope this helps,
Cheers,
Branio
Branislav Petricek

How to block changes in pr after po creation

We have set up the system messages (06 76 as error). However still it is possible that the user can change the description or add new line item after after the release/po creation. How to prevent this. how to block changes in pr after po creation
do i have to create new system messages if yes then hoe kindly suggest
Thanks.
regards

Dear Goel,
When setting the message 06076 and 06400 as described in the note 385002
to error it is no more possible to create a second purchase order with
reference to the purchase requisition.
See SAP note
315448     ME21N: Referencing a purchase requisition
Regards
V V

Spl G/L posting to one time vendor not allowed

Hi Gurus,
I have a one time vendor and want to post special G/L posting for it.
Is there a way of doing this? I have used the account grp CPD.
I am also getting the error below:
<b>spl G/L posting to one time vendor not allowed</b>
Regards
Karan

Hi Karan,
As rightly said by Madhu Spl G/l posting to one time vendor is not allowed in SAP
Iam pasting the contents of SAP Note regarding this.
Kamal
29.03.2007 Page 1 of 1
SAP Note Number 19638 - Special G/L transactions on one-time
accounts
Note Language: English Version: 2 Validity: Valid from 11.12.1996
Summary
Symptom
Special G/L transactions, such as down payments, are not supported for
one-time accounts. One-time accounts should be used for one-time
transactions. For down payment, bill of exchange management or similar
transactions for a customer or vendor, you can assume that this is not a
one-time transaction. To post this type of accounting transactions in FI,
you have to create a master record for the business partner.
Additional key words
Cause and prerequisites
Conception of the one-time accounts.
Solution
Do not use one-time accounts if you want to post special G/L transactions.
Source code corrections
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 10.12.1996 23:00:00
Priority: Recommendations/additional info
Category: Consulting
Main Component FI Financial Accounting
The SAP Note is release-independent
Related Notes
Number Short Text
867348 Preventing down payment request for one-time customers
814038 SAPF103: you cannot post to one-time accounts (F5265)

Vendor Put on SPL block after PO

I have a doubt , during the PO creation in R/3 and the custom doc creation in GTS vendor is not blocked but during the GR the business moves the Vendor to blocked list.
In this during GR will there be a SPL screening happening, for this do we need to map the document types for material document in the application level MM0C in both feedr & the GTS system.
Also my concern since our requirement is only on SPL screening the documet mapping has to be done in the Complaince Managemant or Customs Management node in the IMG of GTS system.

Hi,
Can you please let me know what is the config in MM0A that will decide the SPL screening for GR.
From the thread, I have a question in the real time there is always a chance that vendor is blocked for SPL after creation of POs in this case how to redeterming those POs for which recheck for SPL has to caried out.
Or do we need to have a practive of scheduling a job for document address check so that the POs for these vendor are blocked.
regards,
Murali

Credit block should not prevent service order creation

An upgrade from 4.7 to ECC6, without any changes made to the configuration or program change, has lead to the following issue. ECC6 is not creating a service order connected to a sales order, when the customer has exceeded the credit limit. The sales order of custom order type is getting saved with a warning message that credit limit has exceeded. However, earlier in 4.7, the message would not stop creating subsequent service order. What could be different, that prevent ECC6 environment to hold on to service order creation? A subsequent release of the credit block through VKM1 however triggers the service order being created.

Are you using credit card processing in SAP to get the authorization?
If you are then the authorization should not block the order.
Or are you using credit card as a form of payment (without authorization) in which case this needs to be put on the customers account as a payment and then the order entered.
Where are you holding the credit card details?

How to set a field from an assigment block as required for a BP creation

Hi,
I have the following requirement.
On employee master data creation, I want to make field System user mandatory in Employee creation.
Iam using Component: BP_EMPL View: BP_EMPL/EmployeeDetails
It happens that this field is inside an assignment block (BP DATA, view: InternetUser).
By screen configuration I am not able to set it as a mandatory assignment block or as a mandatory field inside the assignment block. Is there any way to solve this by configuration?
In case of development is better to use an ABAP exit on save moment or is there any option using BSP development?
Thanks.
Susana Messias

Hi Susana!
Please see also these posts related to your issue:
[Different fields depending of BP Role or any other field|Different fields depending of BP Role or any other field]
Here some relevant notes:
Note 1259940 - Authority check for accounts depending on roles
Note 1260695 - Data set-specific screen control
Note 1097651 - How to use the Account Life Cycle
Note 999092 - CRM WebClient: Field & screen modification
Best regards
Arno

Blocking of vendor upon master data creation...

Hi Experts,
Is there a way I can do which will blocked the vendor from payment/posting after its master data creation?
Meaning, once a new vendor code is created its should be defaulted to "blocked for posting" when saving. Unblocking shall be performed by another user.
Thanks so much.

Hi,
You can block vendors through Mass maintenance: Tcode XK99 or through XK05 - Block vendors which is especially for blocking of vendors.
In XK99 you can block more than one vendor where as in XK05 you can block one vendor.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Viswanath

Blocking of deleted materials in SO creation

Hi everyone. Please teach me how to block deleted materials in SO creation. Currently, when a deleted material is encoded an information message is displayed "Material # is marked for deletion". SO is still created. How can I make it an error message?
Thanks,
Ridgy

Go to OVSU, select "01" and click on blue lens on top so that you will see some list of tabs. In that maintain "B" for "Block for order" field and assign this 01 in material master for the field "X-distr.chain status" under Sales: Sales Org.Data 1 tab.
Now for that particular material, sale order cannot be created.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

RTV PO blocked for export in GTS

Hi Experts,
I've successfully been able to convert an RTV PO to viewed as an export document (expord) in GTS in order to compliance checks. This was done by leveraging SAP note 676301. Users then release the items that are blocked from /SAPSLL/LCD_CHANGE and manually assigning the eccn and license. This product master update is done by a separate team because of authorization concerns. The issue occurs once the delivery is created, it is also going on a GTS block for the same items that were blocked on the RTV PO. Does any one know how the ECCN and license that was applied on the RTV PO this way will flow to the delivery? When this same process is done with a standard sales order, there isn't an issue.
Thank you.

The problem could be the Numbering Scheme assigned to the P.O. during the "EXPORD" check. During the document check, Function Module /SAPSLL/CUHD_LLNS_DETERMINE is called, and executes a check for the predecessor if the Legal Regulation is configured to transfer the check results. The system looks for previous check data using the same Numbering Scheme now being considered for the Outbound Delivery, so it seems to be important that the original check was made against that Scheme. Presumably the Delivery check uses Commodity Codes, and usually the P.O. check would use Tariff Codes.
That might not be the answer, but something to think about.
Regards,
Dave

How to block a material that not to creation of service notification thru-IW51

Hi All,
I have tried in all over areas ( MM02 level and MM06 level ) to block a material that not to create service notification with that material but didn't get a solution.If any one knows solution for this kindly provide me.
"How to block a material that not to create a service notifcation thru IW51?"
Best Regards,
Narendra Konnipati

Narendra,
1. I do not see any possibility without using this exit. It is a very simple and effective thing for your ABAPer and you too.
2. In case of many Materials-Notification type combinations, you can maintain similar code by joining several elseif s.
3. Alternatively, you can maintain a Z Table as under:
QMART
MATNR
S3
10000000099999
S3
10000000099988
S1
10000000088988
S2
12000000088988
Means, for every Notification type there will be one or more prohibited materials. The coding will not be difficult, but will have around 15/20 lines.Finally, if you have to get your issue resolved, I feel this is the way and also easy way through your ABAPer.
Tell me in case of any further opinions.
Best of Luck
KJogeswaraRao

SPL block at PO in GTS - GR creation is allowing in ECC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for