Spl G/l Payments

Dear Sir,
We had done Retention, ie from a normal invoice we have transfered to a special G/l account , using 39 Y posting key, now when i want to do payment for that retention document ie i want to do partial payment, its shows the feild in gray, ie i can only make full payment for that document for that retention document, but i want to do partial payment..........is there any special setting for that can u please guide me
Regards,
R.Ramakrishnaraj

Hi,
I understand your problem.. i faced the same problem..
What i did was a DPR for the partial payment to be made and then did a clearing for the vendor so that the balance in retention account is correct.
Reward me points...
Regards
Prasanna

Similar Messages

  • GTS and FI intergration

    Hi,
    Currently we are implementing SAP GTS 7.2, we need to do SPL check on payment run.
    When the payment proposal is generated in ECC - get an error as u201CTechnical error when checking in GTSu201D the message class is u201CFIPAY_GTSu201D but in GTS I could not find any technically incomplete document.
    Does someone know why we are getting this error ?
    Thank you
    Samuel

    Hi Samuel and Sameer,
    Can you please help me on the necessary configuration that has to be made to enable the SPL check during the Payment run.
    Also please let me know whether is it possible to have teh SPL check only during the payment and not during the Logistic document process (Like PO, Inbound Deliver, material Doc, SO, O.D or Billing).
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Murali Mani
    +91 92433 26026.

  • Clear the vendors documents

    How to clear the vendors open documents pls give me advice

    Hi
    Vendor openitems u can clear by way of payment F-53
    if spl gl down payments u can transfer the payment f-54 and also f-44
    Regards

  • Vendor payment with spl gl

    When I use the SPL GL  indicator to vendor payment,  Vendor entry posted properly.  But we have not able to take cheque printout. please explain why??
    Regards,
    Raziq

    Hi ,
    If you have made the settings in the 2  T codes that i mentioned earlier then there should be no porblem .
    In case if you have set a Z programme for the printout then you need to check it .
    In case of pint preview yes you will get a print preview of the document that would be printed before printing , else you can check the same , in F-58 you can make the necessary settings .
    Go to F-58 click on the green button for back and you will view the settings for the printer and printout , in that use the option of test printout for checking purpose .
    Hope this helps .
    Regards ,
    Dewang T

  • Payment Document Screening for SPL

    Hi Guys
    I am facing some issues in doing Synchronous payment document screening in GTS.
    1) Is there anyway to recheck financial documents - Same which we do for Logistics documents via /sapsll/cuhd_mr_spl
    2) Is synchronous checks possible? Like the Purchasing docments where system will let you know as soon as you create a PO.
    While i am checking the Log its showing unable to determine active Legal regulations, this is only being shown for Payment documents.
    The scenario here is we create proposals and instantly do a Payment run, so synchronous check is very essential for us.
    Thanks
    Carl

    Hello Carl,
    1) You can use /SAPSLL/SPL_BLRL_FI --> Manually Release Blocked Payments, which enables you to perform again SPL screening.
    2) Synchronous screening can be set in IMG --> Global Trade Services --> Compliance Management --> Sanctioned Party List Screening --> Activate Business Partner at Business Partner Function Level
    Here you can set MKK (contract partner)  or SLLBNK (Banks) for synchronous. Response form GTS you will seen in Proposal Log (F110 transaction in feeder).
    3) For activation of Legal regulation check whether your legal regulation is active for your relevant country.
    Cheers,
    Gabriel.

  • Making spl GL payment through f110

    Hi,
    My client wanted to make the following spl gl payments through f110.
    - Vendor Security Deposit Received
    - Retention Money
    - Vendor Security Deposit paid
    - Rent Deposit paid
    if we assign all these indicators in fbzp...all co code settings, what and all will be the constraints involved??
    help is required urgently.
    Thanks in advance.
    Dharani

    Hi,
    No issue.
    If you maintain the special GL that you want to pay in FBZP configuration, F110 program will then pick up during payment.
    Regards,
    SAPFICO

  • Payment terms for customer Spl Gl

    Hi,
    Please suggest the way in which i could get the due date based on the payment terms from customer master for a customer down-payment.
    As even when in ob41 & obc4 the field payment terms is kept optional it does not appear for the spl gl posting.
    Is there any way out or is it advisable to keep the due date editable
    Regards,
    Charmaine Martin

    Hi,
    can you please test to enter Payment term in Vendor/Customer master in Comapny code in field Cr meno field . Please see below screen shot .
    Screen shot is vendor related but you should have same in Customer

  • Spl G/L Down Payment Requst Problem

    Hi SAP,
    I have a issue in Spl GL "F"--> I have given my Recon a/c as well Down Payment Request G/L also and in properties i assiged as Noted Item with Target spl GL is F
    But when i am trying to post in F-47 Its saying "spl GL F Not defined for down payment" I am sure i given raido button on Down payment/ down payment request.
    and If i remove noted Item tick mark its accepting the entry in F-47 but not showing request in F-48.
    What to do?? am missing any configuration part???
    Regards,

    Hi Pokala,
    in transaction OBYR, You should define:
    K          A          Dwn pmt
    and
    K          F          Pmt req --> properties Target sp.G/L ind. A and Noted item v
    When You run F-47, enter A in Special Gl field and not F, once posted it would show F.
    I hope this helps.
    mauri

  • SPL screen for FI payment docuemnt

    Hi,
    SPL acreening for Financial accounting is working for limited transactions. Vendor payment document with check printing and F110 payment proposal is working fine.
    But with customer paymenr receipts, Manual payment document creation through F-28 is not blocking though the customer is blocked in GTS system. Will SPL screening limited to few transaction codes in FI? Do we need to do some enhancements to activate SPL screening at F-28?
    Regards,
    Lakshmikanth

    Hi Frances,
    I think you've mis-understood a little.  The values for mapping are already in your note.  Those values are hard-coded in the ERP system, and you simply have to map them to associated values in GTS.
    Let's take Document Type.  If you want to use the standard GTS document type 'IMPORD' for your compliance checks on incoming payments, then you will need to create an entry to map ERP type FIIN to GTS type IMPORD.  But probably you will create your own GTS Document Type for FI postings - it's your choice.
    Same idea for Item Category.  The ERP system always sends the FI data with 'FI0A', so you could map that to GTS Item Category 'IMORD1', or to the one that you create.
    For Partners, you can map through whichever ones you want to check.  Here's the list of the partners that are sent from ERP:
    FIKRE = Vendor
    FIPAY = Payee
    FIDEB = Customer
    FIREG = Payer
    FIPAB = Bank
    FIACO = Account Holder
    FIOTP = One-time payment
    I think those same Partner Functions exist in the standard GTS system, so your mapping is simple (e.g. FIKRE = FIKRE).
    There is not much more that I can tell you, but if you continue to have problems, please come back.
    Regards,
    Dave

  • Making spl gl payments through f110

    Hi,
    My client wanted to make the following spl gl payments through f110.
    - Vendor Security Deposit Received
    - Retention Money
    - Vendor Security Deposit paid
    - Rent Deposit paid
    if we assign all these indicators in fbzp...all co code settings, what and all will be the constraints involved??
    help is required urgently.
    Thanks in advance.
    Dharani

    Hi,
    No issue.
    If you maintain the special GL that you want to pay in FBZP configuration, F110 program will then pick up during payment.
    Regards,
    SAPFICO

  • Down payment and Spl GL indicator config

    SAP gurus,
    Can someone provide me detail step by step procedure with tcodes for activating Down payment functionality. I am aware of tcode FBKP and OBYR. Is there any other config to be done for Down payment.
    thanks in advance

    Following configuration needs to be there for down payment request(w.r.t vendor):
    a. A vendor down payment acct
    b. alternative recon acct for down payment
       ( FA > AR/AP > Business Xn > DP made > Carryout & check doc settings > Define alt. recon acct )
    c. if it is special gl then set the acct type as A+K, enter COA, enter accts(normal and special gl) and finally save.
    d. F-48
    e. FB60/F-43
    f.  F-53
    g. F-44
    hope it helps.
    thnx
    NT

  • Payment block with spl gl indicator wise

    Hi Experts
    after down payment request,
    that payment should block for payment,
    for this where can we do settings.
    regards
    venkat

    Hi
    Payment Request is a noted item and when you do automatic payment programme it will be picked up for payment.
    Moreover when you create Down Payment Request itself, you have the option of entering payment block for that particular request.
    Regards,
    K Lakshmanan

  • Vendor Down Payment Clearing: F-54 or F-44

    Hi
    I have made a down payment (with Spl. GL indicator) to a vendor, using F-48. Then I book an invoice using FB60. I kept the two amounts same and ignored WT to keep things simple.
    Now i want to clear the down payment against the invoice. I use F-54. The clearing transaction is getting posted. However, the Invoice is lying open (credit entry) along with the Clearing document (debit entry). On the other hand the down payment document (debit) is getting cleared with the Clearing document (credit entry). This means I have two open line items and two cleared line items. I can clear the two open items again using F-44.
    I have two questions:
    1. What is the use of F-54 here since I have to use F-44 eventually?
    2. While doing F-54, Posting Key for the debit line item is 26 : Payment Difference. This is could not understand.
    Can anyone please help me out on this?
    Thanks in advance
    Aninda

    Dear Aninda ,
    I will explain you with following example.
    Recon account(Vendor)---3000000
    Advance to Vendor----
    4005000
    Exp a/c----
    7575100
    Bank a/c----
    5000100
    1. Advance to Vendor (spl gl -A)(F-48)
    Vendor a/c    (SPL-A)( GL- 4005000)        DR   1000
                      T0  Bank a/c (GL-5000100)                  1000
    2. Invoice posting
    Expenditure a/c ( GL-7575100) Dr      1000
         To  Vendor Account(GL-3000000)     1000
    3. Clear Vendor Down Payment (F-54)     
    Vendor  a/c (GL-3000000) DR                1000 (Posting key-26)
         To Vendor a/c (SPL-A)( GL- 4005000)          1000
    It means  Credited spl GL-A has converted from advance to Normal open item. Amount has been transferred from Advance to Vendor GL to Normal Recon account.By this way Advance account shows Nil  Balance with debit(F-48) and Credit (F-54)
    The remaining 2 line items i.e., Credit (F-43) and Debit (F-54) shows as open items. In the next step we need to knock off those line items by manual clearing or automatic clearing.
    4. Normal Clearing (F-44)
    It will be posted without line items.
    I hope i am able to help you out to understand process

  • Infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level

    We would like an infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level of the document.  The issue seems to be joining vendor to the document cost distribution lines. 
    1.) BSAK + BSIK can be combined with an infoset data structure but only contain the vendor line of a document;  the cost distribution lines are not in the tables. 
    2.) BSIS + BSAS can be combined with an infoset data structure but lack vendor data and joins (to a vendor source) are not an option with data structures.  Vendor data added with an additional field is too slow to be a primary selection field. 
    3.) Logical data base KDF in an infoset returns only the vendor line of a document, not the cost distribution lines. 
    4.) Logical data base BRM in an infoset can have vendor from BSAK/BSIK attached by an additional field but performance is too slow to be useful.  Joins are not an option in a logical data base infoset.
    5.) Complete data is lacking when table joins between document cost distribution tables and vendor data tables are possible, (SPL actual line item table & BSIP or FMIFIIT & FMIFIHD).  BSIP lacks AB documents (reversals).  FM tables lack general ledger only documents. 
    6.) BSAK and BSIK together have complete vendor data but joins of both to a basis table do not work well.  Left outer joins are too slow, inner joins won’t work since the tables have mutually exclusive data. 
    It would be ideal to have vendor in BKPF, like FMIFIHD has, but it isn't a field.
    Does anyone know of any other options?  I have seen the helpful thread on How to Read BSEG Efficiently

    Hi,
    This is SAP Business one reporting and printing forum. Please find correct forum and repost above discussion to get quick response.
    Please close this thread here with helpful answer.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nagarajan

  • Infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level of the document

    We would like an infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level of the document.  The issue seems to be joining vendor to the document cost distribution lines. 
    1.) BSAK + BSIK can be combined with an infoset data structure but only contain the vendor line of a document;  the cost distribution lines are not in the tables. 
    2.) BSIS + BSAS can be combined with an infoset data structure but lack vendor data and joins (to a vendor source) are not an option with data structures.  Vendor data added with an additional field is too slow to be a primary selection field. 
    3.) Logical data base KDF in an infoset returns only the vendor line of a document, not the cost distribution lines. 
    4.) Logical data base BRM in an infoset can have vendor from BSAK/BSIK attached by an additional field but performance is too slow to be useful.  Joins are not an option in a logical data base infoset.
    5.) Complete data is lacking when table joins between document cost distribution tables and vendor data tables are possible, (SPL actual line item table & BSIP or FMIFIHD & FMIFIIT).  BSIP lacks AB documents (reversals).  FM tables lack general ledger only documents. 
    6.) BSAK and BSIK together have complete vendor data but joins of both to a basis table are not an option.  Left outer joins are too slow, inner joins won’t work since the tables have mutually exclusive data. 
    Does anyone know of any other options?

    Hi,
    This is SAP Business one reporting and printing forum. Please find correct forum and repost above discussion to get quick response.
    Please close this thread here with helpful answer.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nagarajan

Maybe you are looking for