SPL partner function issue

Hi,
I have setup partner function LF(vendor) in SPL screening in GTS system.
I have created a vendor and sent to GTS and got screened and no SPL block.
But when I pass PO created using this vendor it says blocked for SPL.
I see following 2 messages in spl log
1.SPL screening for partner 46, partner role LF
- partner address not found in any SPL list
My comments - this is green and partner 46 exists and clear
2.SPL screening for partner LF, partner role LF
- partner address is identified in the boycott list.
My comments - this is red and and there is no partner # LF, so why this entry being created. where this partner LF came from?
Please advice

hi,
check also the applications log. That is, checkt the document within GTS again and analyse the detailes results. Are you using any kind of userexit during document transfer? Any idea from where the system could get LF as partner number? Check the document again. How did you set up LF for SPL? What exacty have you done there?
Balazs

Similar Messages

Partner Function Issue

Dear all,
I have an issue wherin the system is allowing me to change the Ship To in the sales order and this Ship to is not a part of the Partner to sold to and the order is allowing me to enter any SHip To and getting Saved. Can you pls let me know where is the setting for this and not to allow any other ship to's to be manually entered in the SO.
Thanks
Srikkanth

Dear Srikkanth,
There are two issue in your qestion:
1. Not allow any other **** to party then the one mentioned in Sold to party
2. Do not allow to change the Ship to party.
Now the solutions to the above issues are as follows:
1. IMG - Sales and Distribution - Basic Functions - Partner Determination - Set Up Partner Determination - Set Up Partner Determination for Sales Document Header - Select TA - Standard Order & click on " Partner Functions in Procedure" on the left hand side.
Here for combination of TA & SH (Ship to party) Maintain "SP" in the source feild.
2. In the same menu path mentioned above - Put Tick mark in the check box of Not Modifiable so that user cannot change the Ship to party proposed by the system from the Sold to party.
Hope this solves...
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta.

Partner function issues while creating SA using LSMW

Hi,
I am opening a new thread (though similar question has been put by Vihaan in below thread)
Tax code in SA - LSMW
We are creating SAs via LSMW IDOC method (Message Type - PURSAG_CREATE and Basic Type - PURSAG_CREATE01), all our SAs being created w r to Contract and Contract has multiple OA and PI partner functions. So while creating SA we are passing unique OA and PI value (from list of valid OA/PI avaialble in contract) in LSMW structures - E1BPMEOUTPARTNER and E1BPMEOUTPARTNERX.
Values passed are mentioned below:
E1BPMEOUTPARTNER               Partner Information for Outline Agreement
    Fields
        PARTN_ROLE                   Partner Function
                            Rule :   Constant
                            Code:    E1BPMEOUTPARTNER-PARTN_ROLE = 'BA'.
        PLANT                        Plant
        SUBRANGE_TX                  Description of Vendor Subrange
        LANGU                        Language Key
        LANGU_ISO                    Language according to ISO 639
        PARTNR                       Reference to other vendor
                            Rule :   Constant
                            Code:    E1BPMEOUTPARTNER-PARTNR = '1XXXXXXXX9'.
        DEF_PARTNR                   Default Partner
                            Rule :   Constant
                            Code:    E1BPMEOUTPARTNER-DEF_PARTNR = 'X'.
        DELETE_IND                   Deletion Indicator in Purchasing Document
E1BPMEOUTPARTNERX              Change Parameter Partner Data (Outline Agreement)
    Fields
        PARTN_ROLE                   Partner Function
                            Rule :   Constant
                            Code:    E1BPMEOUTPARTNERX-PARTN_ROLE = 'BA'.
        PLANT                        Plant
        SUBRANGE_TX                  Description of Vendor Subrange
        LANGU                        Updated information in related user data field
        LANGU_ISO                    Updated information in related user data field
        PARTNR                       Updated information in related user data field
                            Rule :   Constant
                            Code:    E1BPMEOUTPARTNERX-PARTNR = 'X'.
        DEF_PARTNR                   Updated information in related user data field
                            Rule :   Constant
                            Code:    E1BPMEOUTPARTNERX-DEF_PARTNR = 'X'.
        DELETE_IND                   Updated information in related user data field
Now issue is SAP is not recognizing above mentioned partner value and throwing error as Following mandatory roles missing in partner maintenance: OA
If the reffered contract has single OA and PI LSMW is running fine and creating SA successfully but issue is coming only when we have multiple OA/PI.
Has anybody faced similar issue or aware if any OSS note which resolves this issue, please advise.
Thanks,
Yogesh

Hi Jurgen,
I have created a separate source structure for passing partner function and now have below source structure:
Source Structures
       HEADER_SA            Header Structure
           PARTNER_SA          PARTNER STRUCTURE (Lower level to Header)
           ITEM_SA              Item Structure (Lower level to Header but at the same level as Partner)
Then created a separate file for partner having both OA and PI value as shown below (ID is common field between all three structures Header, item and Partner):
ID     PARVW     LIFN2     DEFPA
1     BA     1XXXXXXX9     X
1     RS     1XXXXXXX7     X
Now after convert data step it considers above values for partner role but still LSMW fails with same error "Mandatory PF missing, OA, PI"
Also, one more info wanted to share- if in my contract I put a tick mark against one of the partner OA/PI in DEFAULT BOX, it works fine but that does not make any sense as the whole pupose of having multiple OA/PI is to give option to business of selecting one of the avaialble OA/PI.
FYI - I have opened a customer message to SAP, let see what they suggest.
Thanks,
Yogesh

Sales Order line item Partner Function issue.

Dear Guru's
I want to assign the (Employee response) partner function ER more than 5 times in Sales Order line partner function tab, but system is not accepting for that.
Please suggest me how to over come this issue with out assigning the u201CERu201D partner function more than 5 times in sales order line item Partner determination procedure.
Regards,
Hari Krishna

sent this to SD module (Sales and Distribution) Forum
this is PS module and we do not deal with this object

Replication of Partner Function from CRM 5 to ECC6 Issue

Hi experts
Is someone able to assist with pointing me in the correct direction to resolve a partner function replication issue please. We create all entities/BPs in CRM, and replicate them to ECC.
We have a custom partner function, ZF, that is held against Payer and Sold-to in ECC. This is a separate entity in CRM, but is sent according to relationship assignment to ECC. We have noticed that this partner function is not being updated correctly.
Scenarios:
Ending a relationship between Account/Customer (Payer/sold-to in ECC) and the Farm (ZF partner function) - the ZF partner function is removed in ECC. This is correct behaviour.
New Account or Customer creation in ECC with ZF relationship assigned, ZF partner function is being created in ECC. This is correct behaviour.
HOWEVER, when adding a new ZF relationship in CRM to an existing Payer/Sold-to, the ZF partner function does not get created in ECC. This is incorrect behaviour - new valid relationship should trigger ZF partner function in ECC.
Also, name changes to the ZF maintained in CRM, is not being updated in ECC for existing relationships. Instead, the Partner Function tab, ZF type, displays the old name for the Farm.
BUPAREL bdocs are being created and sent to ECC, however something is happening on the receiver end. How do we trace this, and does anyone have any ideas on where to start to find out what is happening here?
Many thanks
Cara

Solved, internal issue usage tab not being completed correctly so not assigning partner function

Issue in Partner Function

Hi all,
I have an issue. I have created a customer say 'A' and a ship to party say 'B' and 'C'.
In customer master of 'A', I have assigned ship to party 'B'. At the time of order creation for 'A', system shows me 'B' as possible option for ship to party. I manually enter ship to party C there and system does not give any error. I want that system should accept only those ship to parties that are maintained in customer master at the time of sales order creation.
Any idea for that?
Many Thanks
Best Regards,
AI.

Dear AI,
Try this:
IMG - Sales and Distribution - Basic Functions - Partner Determination - Set Up Partner Determination - Set Up Partner Determination for Sales Document Header -
Select TA - Standard Order & then select Partner FUnctions in Procedure (from Left side).
Here for the required Partner Functions (SP, SH, BP & PY) in Origin (Table) maintain "C"
C - stands for - Partner function from customer master (table KNVP).
This will ensure that partner Functions are taken only from Customer Master.
Hope this helps...
Thanks,
Jginesh Mehta

Unable to find partner function for SPL screening

Hi Guys
We are trying out the SPL functionality for our Client, We are in the Preliminary stages and have just started the Intial Configuration
The problem comes is the Document in ECC is getting blocked and is working as per functionality
But when in come in the GTS system and check the Documents via (SPL > Display all Documents) in the overview menu, and go ahead and check the Log, it shows an error stating
"Unable to find partner function for SPL screening"
I have checked the configuration and The partner structure, Functions and Assignment are all done
Can the experts help in getting a small checklist which I should do a check through in the configuration/user side, which can trigger this error message?
Thanks
Regards
Carl Ray

Hi Carl,
Did you load the SPL List for Screening? Prior to SPL Screening, we have to create Index for SPL Screening. Please follow the following steps and then re-check the document
SAP GTS Area Menu (/SAPSLL/MENU_LEGAL) -> Sanctioned Party List Screening -> Master Data. Perform the below steps in sequence.
Step 1: Reset Buffer
Step 2: Generate Comparison Terms
Step 3: Aggregate Comparison Terms
Step 4: Comparison terms for Business partners
After doing the above steps, then do the following step
SAP GTS Area Menu (/SAPSLL/MENU_LEGAL) -> Sanctioned Party List Screening -> Logistics -> Check against updated Sanctioned Party Lists -> Check Business partner addresses
After performing the above steps, then re-check the document.
Let me know if the above solution help or not
Regards
Pradeep

Issue with Shopping Cart ... No Address Found For Partner Function etc.

Hi Experts,
I am facing an issue in EBP.
Using SRM 5.0 classic scenario.
While creating a shopping cart we are experiencing the following ERROR: "error in system, shopping cart cannot be processed any further."
The details of errors are as below:
No data found for contact person XXX. inform System Administration (XXX is the BP ID of the user)
No address found for partner function type Goods Recipient
No address found for partner function type Requestor
Please help me in overcoming the issue.
Thanks,
Pratyush

Thanks for your reply
I have already checked that the BP number is present.
However using bbp_bp_om_integrate i got the errors:
using user ID from su01: I got a red signal in Object Existence / Consistency with error
"Business Partner for user XXX is missing or containing errors"
using CP & BP : I got a red signal in Address consistency & following errors:
"Error determining address for employee XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX" & "Address for person (BP) XXX missing"
Please help

Vi01 - Issue in conversion of partner function data in VTPA table

Dear All,
In VI01 tcode while creating shipment cost document, system gives error message as see log.
"Item not created because service agent CR not in reference document".
When debug, it is found that system is not converting data of table VTPA from PARVW (SP) to CR in following FM.
SD_SCD_ITEM_INITIALIZE
at line no. 55
* determine relevant partner
READ TABLE I_REFOBJ-VBPA INTO L_VBPA_WA
WITH KEY POSNR = I_TSNUM
PARVW = I_TVFT-PARVW BINARY SEARCH.
please help if anyone has idea of this type of error.
Thanks in advance,
Rajesh Vasudeva

In general I would focus on the message "Item not created because service agent CR not in reference document"
Do you have any proof that a CR partner is in the reference document? screen shots from document or table?
You probably know that a partner function key is a German abbreviation SP = Spediteur
And in customizing you actually maintain that SP is e.g. CR for carrier in english
Looking at your document you should then see a partner CR, looking into the table you would see a SP if the conversion exit is not active in your SE16, or you see a CR if the conversion is activated.
So far the coding does not tell much.
But the message says that a CR partner is missing.
I would suggest you check your customizing to find the relation from the original key to your CR.
then check the reference documents if you have a partner for this role.

Issue on partner function for PO

Hi Gurus ,
Can you please help me on this problem , Does PO have a corresponding partner function of shipto customer and unloading point? if yes what table it is maintained?

Table : EKPA
field : PARVW
I think you have two threads for the same question which isnot advised.
Mathews

Customer Master Partner Functions - Load issue

As part of Main Customer loads (Soldd-to), we loaded all the Customers. Partner Functions - pointing to same Customer Number - were created for all the Customers.
Our second step was to create Partners for the sold-to. When we load Partners, they are being 'added' to the existing default Partners but not replacing.
We used the standard SAP RFBIDE00 in LSMW for this.
Apart from the 'recording' method, is there any way we can achieve this?
Best Regards,
Ram

Shalom Maya,
Normally, the fastest way to look for a datasource is to search help.sap.com.
In this case if seems like for KNVP there is no standard extraction, so might need to create your own generic extractor.
Take a look at the following posting (It might help you achieve your requirement):
Re: Partner functions (R/3 table KNVP)
Bye,
Gilad

Issue while uploading Partner Function in Sales Order through LSMW

Dear All,
I have to make change some partner function at item level in existing sales order. I have created the LSMW for changing the partner function at item level. But while recording the system field (Field Name ) will maintained as beow:
GVS_TC_DATA-REC-PARTNER(08)
GVS_TC_DATA-REC-PARTNER(09)
It will run successully when at line item the Partners which i have to change are availble at 08 & 09 level. But in some cases the partners are available on differnet position, in that case my LSMW will not work.
Is there any solution for the same.
Thanks in advance.
PM
Edited by: PM on Mar 7, 2012 6:47 AM

Hi,
This is the most common drawback while using LSMW. The position should be the same for all records to update the partner function. Else, think of of writing a BDC or manually updating it.
Regards,
Raghav

Partner function not working when creating PO with ref to PReq

Partner function is not working when creating a Purchase Order with ref to a Purchase Requistion, Partner functions maintained in the vendor master are VN, OA & PI.
But OA & PI are not appearing in the PO header partner tab when created with ref to PR.
however it works when i create the PO directly ( without the PR ref )
I am using the same material & Plant for both manual PO & PR to PO.
Any idea what could be wrong .
I have maintained the settings for schema groups for vendor master & purchasing doc in the partner determination.
Thanks
Dkmurthy

Hi,
I have also an issue that seems similar to one you are discussing.
When we use ME59N and create a PO with ref. from a PR (created from a sales order), the message determination works well, it reads the condition set in MN04 (condition records for messages), and creates a message (with output type for EDI , medium: 6, and partner function LS: Logical system). Message is created and idoc is sent.
When we try with ME21N, ME21 and we create the PO with ref. to the same PR, either by entering manually the PR in the document overview of ME21N or by selecting the PR (without entering the PR number), i.e with date, the message is not created in the PO.
Company code is assigned to purchase organization, and so is purchase organization to plant.
Any idea why there is no automatic message determination in the case of the transaction: ME21N
Note: If I try ME21N, and enter the output type and partner, manually, I receive a warning message
VN006 (Partner XXXX does not exist for partner function LS). If I accept this warning message, then message is saved- idoc is sent. However I can not overcome the warning message, if it plays any role, because I can not assign partner function LS to the vendor.Then I receive message CZ 327 (Can not use this partner role).
Any input is wellcome.

Partner function at shipment

Hi Experts,
Kindly advise on the below issue.
Currently in VT01N(create shipment) when we enter FwdAgent and other details like shipping cond. ,at "Partner tab" partner function SP Transporter comes by default/automatically that is nothing but my FwdAgent.
Now we want TS Tpt. Service tax should also comes automatically/default as SP Transporter comes,
Please advise how to acheive this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Dharminder dalal

Hello,
The Service Agent is copied automatically from Delivery Document Based on the Copy Routine assigned in Shipment Document Type in Shipment Document Type.
But for Service Tax, you will have to maintain Condition Records in Shipment Pricing Procedure. Actually you will have to configure Shipment Pricing Procedure similar to Sales Order Pricing Procedure.
The IMG link for the same is IMG - Logistics Execution - Transportation - Shipment Costs - Pricing - Pricing Control.
Hope this helps,
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Tax Jurisdiction Code Check as part of a Sales Order Partner Function

Hi,
I have a scenario where we modify partner information directly in the sales order. These partners are simple addresses and are not tax relevant. We have set them up as one-time customers. Every time when we modify the address information, Vertex kicks in and tries to match the address information (street, city and state) with a tax jurisdiction code. In our case the address information is high level (only city and state) which is not enough for Vertex. SAP issues then a blocking error message.
We try to find a way to ignore Vertex for these specific partners. In the documentation we have found a user exit, as well as a BADI, but our developpers were not able to make it work in the sales oder.
The user-exit is the following: EXIT_SAPLFYTX_USER_001
The BADI is the following: IF_EX_ADDRESS_SUBSCREEN
In EXIT_SAPLFYTX_USER_001, I've found a parameter (EXEMP_IND) which could enable to bypass the tax jurisdiction code check and the RFC call to Vertex.
In IF_EX_ADDRESS_SUBSCREEN, I've found a parameter (CHECK_ADDRESS) which could potentially bypass the check as well.
Did any of you already experience this scenario or would you have an idea about how I could make this work?
Thanks
Loic

Unfortunately, the sales order is created through an interface (using iDOCs), and the external system feeding the iDOC for the sales order creation does not have any Zip Code information. Besides, even if the Zip Code is entered, it is still not enough for Vertex to choose automatically a Tax Jurisdiction Code, most of the times, it is also requiring a District, which again, will not be passed from the interface.
We went through this analysis already and we came to the conclusion that we need to bypass this check, as this partner function is not tax relevant.
Thanks,
Loic
Edited by: Loic Dominik on Jun 27, 2011 7:39 PM

SPL partner function issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for