Split horizon with poison reverse
Hi,
I have below network
R1 ------ R2 (Fa0/1) -- (172.30.22.1/24)
The network connected to interface (Fa0/1) on Router2 was down; therefore R2 triggered partial update about this network as poison to R1.
My question is why R1 is advertised the poison reverse back to R2 about this network, what the benefit for that.
BR,
Auos.
Auos
The benefit is that R2 does not then try to find a route to 172.30.22.0/24 via R1. In a large network with a lot of routers this can save a certain amount of convergence time.
Jon
Similar Messages
-
Cisco WebEx Meetings Server-Internal IRP vs Split Horizon
Hi,
We are planning to install CWMS 1.1 but not able to decide among below two topology -
a.Internal Internet Reverse Proxy with all virtual machines including IRP in same internal network(ie no IRP in DMZ).
b.Split Horizon with IRP in DMZ network.
I would prefer option a.(all VM in internal network) as fewer changes on the firewall(allow potrt 80 & 443 from external to internal) but not sure how risky it is as will be allowing all external internet traffic directly to IRP internal on port 80 & 443.Will we be compromising on security if we go with this option?
Please suggest which option is recommended .I have gone through the pros & cons mentioned in CWMS planning guide 1.1.
Thanks
KMSSrdjan, KMS,
Appologies to jump in, but I am also doing a 50 port installation. I am leaning towards internal topology as well as it appears to be less complex and best preforming.
Srjdan,
+5 for the info. Can you please confirm if below applies to 50 port systems as well? Do we need to have a minimum of two boxes to install split-horizon-topology?
"On another hand for that deployment you need 2 HW box's."
I was under the impression we can patch the physical CWMS server onto a DMZ switch and can do split-horizon-topology with only one hadware box. Can you please confirm if thats possible at all?
I tried to raise a request with PDI and was rejected that PDI at the moment is not supporting this product.
I have same queries - let me know I can open a separate thread if you want.
1) How much of a security risk it invloves doing Internal IRP?
2) Is there any additional Cisco device we can recommend to the customer to add extra layer of security to the solution?
3) We have only one hardware box - what would be the best design in that scenario? (50 port installation)
Terry -
Setting Up DNS - Making Sure I'm Not Running Split Horizon
Hello everyone - I'm wanting to make sure I am running my DNS correctly and that it isn't split horizon.
I purchased a domain name (johnsonsfromtyler.com). I have public "@" and "mail" A host names pointing to my public IP address, have a MX for johnsonsfromtyler.com pointing to mail.johnsonsfromtyler.com, and have a reverse lookup setup all via public DNS.
On my SLS running the private DNS I have the primary zone name set as johnsonsfromtyler.com. For the nameserver I have the zone johnsonsfromtyler.com. pointing to server.johnsonsfromtyler.com which has a static IP of 10.0.1.10. I also have a mail exchanger hostname of mail.johnsonsfromtyler.com with a priority of 10. I also have an alias for mail.johnsonsfromtyler.com pointed to server.johnsonsfromtyler.com. I also have forwarder IP addresses pointing to the OpenDNS servers.
I have my router setup to use the private DNS server located at 10.0.1.10 and the search domain as johnsonsfromtyler.com. server.johnsonsfromtyler.com is running DNS and all other server services.
So am I running DNS correctly and is this setup a split horizon setup? Also, do I need to have forwarder IP addresses pointing to external DNS servers?As Mr Hoffman writes if your "reuse" a public IP domain name in an internal private IP only LAN DNS your are using a "split horizon" DNS (where did that "designation" come from?).
To reach pubic IP servers using the same domain name from your LAN using only the internal DNS, you need to put also the pubic IP servers in your internal DNS with their public IPs. The reverse zone for any "remote" public IPs that Server Admin creates should be removed to let the DNS responsible for that zone answer those lookups - probably not too important for most configurations though.
BIND views can be used to give answers to lookups depending on where (what IP) the query comes from. The same DNS could be setup with different views where public and private IPs are in separate views so that private name -> IP lookups only gets answered when the query comes from the private IP LAN. If you can have a different response (IP) for the same name -> IP lookup? - probably(?) - if the private IP view is listed before the public one in the DNS config.
And I think a DNS is always caching lookups (?) not depending on if forwarders is used or not. Forwarders can speed up lookups but can also make trouble if they stop working/starting refusing answering recursive lookup queries. Without forwarders the DNS has to go "the long way" via root DNS servers (you should update /var/named/named.ca regularly especially if not using forwarders). -
BGP allowas-in and split horizon problem.
Hi,
I need some help. I can't understand why R2 advertises back the same networks to the neighbor from that received.
My topology is:
R1 is in AS1, R2 is in AS2 and R3 is in AS3, I've eBGP R1-R2, and eBGP R2-R3.
R1 and R3 has configured allowas-in to permit routes with their own AS.
The problem is with eBGP Updates. The router R1 advertise 1.1.1.1/32 to R2, and R2 sent back to R1 the same route 1.1.1.1/32.
I think that should not happen according the BGP split horizon rules. R2 should not advertise those networks who learned from R1, unless R2 has a route with better metric.
The same behavior happens between R2 and R3.
Thanks in advance.
All the router had the same IOS: c7200-is-mz.123-14.T1.bin
R1 Configuration
R1#sh run | sec router
router bgp 1
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
network 1.1.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255
neighbor 172.28.1.1 remote-as 2
neighbor 172.28.1.1 allowas-in 10
neighbor 172.28.1.1 soft-reconfiguration inbound
no auto-summary
R1#
R2 Configuration
router bgp 2
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 172.28.1.2 remote-as 1
neighbor 172.28.1.2 soft-reconfiguration inbound
neighbor 172.28.2.2 remote-as 3
neighbor 172.28.2.2 soft-reconfiguration inbound
no auto-summary
R2#
R3 Configuration
router eigrp 200
redistribute connected
redistribute bgp 3 metric 100000 10 255 100 1500
network 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.3
no auto-summary
router bgp 3
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
redistribute connected
redistribute eigrp 200
neighbor 172.28.2.1 remote-as 2
neighbor 172.28.2.1 allowas-in 10
neighbor 172.28.2.1 soft-reconfiguration inbound
no auto-summary
R3#
R1 BGP Table, Advertised Route, Received Routes
R1#sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 1.1.1.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
* 1.1.1.1/32 172.28.1.1 0 2 1 i
*> 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
*> 3.3.3.3/32 172.28.1.1 0 2 3 ?
*> 4.4.4.4/32 172.28.1.1 0 2 3 ?
*> 172.28.2.0/30 172.28.1.1 0 2 3 ?
*> 192.168.3.0/30 172.28.1.1 0 2 3 ?
R1#
R1#sh ip bgp neighbors 172.28.1.1 advertised-routes
BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 1.1.1.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 1.1.1.1/32 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
Total number of prefixes 1
R1#
R1#sh ip bgp neighbors 172.28.1.1 received-routes
BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 1.1.1.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
* 1.1.1.1/32 172.28.1.1 0 2 1 i
*> 3.3.3.3/32 172.28.1.1 0 2 3 ?
*> 4.4.4.4/32 172.28.1.1 0 2 3 ?
*> 172.28.2.0/30 172.28.1.1 0 2 3 ?
*> 192.168.3.0/30 172.28.1.1 0 2 3 ?
Total number of prefixes 5
R1#
R2 BGP Table, Advertised Route, Received Routes
R2#sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 172.28.2.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 1.1.1.1/32 172.28.1.2 0 0 1 i
*> 3.3.3.3/32 172.28.2.2 0 0 3 ?
*> 4.4.4.4/32 172.28.2.2 156160 0 3 ?
r> 172.28.2.0/30 172.28.2.2 0 0 3 ?
*> 192.168.3.0/30 172.28.2.2 0 0 3 ?
R2#
R2#
R2 Received routes from R1
R2#sh ip bgp neighbors 172.28.1.2 received-routes
BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 172.28.2.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 1.1.1.1/32 172.28.1.2 0 0 1 i
Total number of prefixes 1
R2#
R2 Advertised routes to R1
R2#sh ip bgp neighbors 172.28.1.2 advertised-routes
BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 172.28.2.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 1.1.1.1/32 172.28.1.2 0 0 1 i
*> 3.3.3.3/32 172.28.2.2 0 0 3 ?
*> 4.4.4.4/32 172.28.2.2 156160 0 3 ?
r> 172.28.2.0/30 172.28.2.2 0 0 3 ?
*> 192.168.3.0/30 172.28.2.2 0 0 3 ?
Total number of prefixes 5
R2#
R2 Received routes from R3
R2#sh ip bgp neighbors 172.28.2.2 received-routes
BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 172.28.2.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 3.3.3.3/32 172.28.2.2 0 0 3 ?
*> 4.4.4.4/32 172.28.2.2 156160 0 3 ?
r> 172.28.2.0/30 172.28.2.2 0 0 3 ?
*> 192.168.3.0/30 172.28.2.2 0 0 3 ?
Total number of prefixes 4
R2#
R2 Advertised routes to R3
R2#sh ip bgp neighbors 172.28.2.2 advertised-routes
BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 172.28.2.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 1.1.1.1/32 172.28.1.2 0 0 1 i
*> 3.3.3.3/32 172.28.2.2 0 0 3 ?
*> 4.4.4.4/32 172.28.2.2 156160 0 3 ?
r> 172.28.2.0/30 172.28.2.2 0 0 3 ?
*> 192.168.3.0/30 172.28.2.2 0 0 3 ?
Total number of prefixes 5
R2#
R3 BGP Table, Advertised Route, Received Routes
R3#sh ip bg
BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 1.1.1.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 1.1.1.1/32 172.28.2.1 0 2 1 i
* 3.3.3.3/32 172.28.2.1 0 2 3 ?
*> 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
* 4.4.4.4/32 172.28.2.1 0 2 3 ?
*> 192.168.3.2 156160 32768 ?
* 172.28.2.0/30 172.28.2.1 0 2 3 ?
*> 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
* 192.168.3.0/30 172.28.2.1 0 2 3 ?
*> 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
R3#
R3#sh ip bgp neighbors 172.28.2.1 advertised-routes
BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 1.1.1.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 3.3.3.3/32 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
*> 4.4.4.4/32 192.168.3.2 156160 32768 ?
*> 172.28.2.0/30 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
*> 192.168.3.0/30 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
Total number of prefixes 4
R3#
R3#sh ip bgp neighbors 172.28.2.1 received-routes
BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 1.1.1.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 1.1.1.1/32 172.28.2.1 0 2 1 i
* 3.3.3.3/32 172.28.2.1 0 2 3 ?
* 4.4.4.4/32 172.28.2.1 0 2 3 ?
* 172.28.2.0/30 172.28.2.1 0 2 3 ?
* 192.168.3.0/30 172.28.2.1 0 2 3 ?
Total number of prefixes 5
R3#I agree with the previous posters. What you could do is look at show bgp ipv4 unicast 1.1.1.1 on R2. You will find that the prefix is associated with an update group. An update group is an optimisation within the router BGP process to reduce the processing overhead for generating updates to peers. If two peers have exactly the same outbound routing policy they would be in the same update group. If you looked at the update group show bgp ipv4 unicast update-group <number> you would probabably find that it would contain the peers 172.28.1.2 and 172.28.2.2.
This would mean that the 1.1.1.1 would be replicated to R1 and R3. Without remoteas-in configured R1 would reject the prefix due the AS path containing AS1 - you can see this if you look at the output from show bgp ipv4 unicast neighbor 172.28.1.1 towards the bottom you will see the quantity of prefixes that have been rejected and why - use debug ip bgp updates if you want to see this in real time.
When remoteas-in is configured the prefix from R2 is accepted into the BGP table - however this is irrelevant as it will never become the best-path due to the weight 32768 for the local origination. If R1 peered with R4 via eBGP for example only this best path would advertised and hence nothing is broken.
HTH -
Setting advertisement / split horizon direction in EIGRP routing
Hello all,
I am trying to work out if I am being a bit rubbish or if split horizon is my new worst enemy.
Below is a diagram of my (simplified) problem scenario using EIGRP.
The solution I am looking for is that Router R3 learns of the 10.0.0.0/8 network from both R1 and R2, then does not advertise it to either. Simple with split horizon enabled.
But when either R1 or R2 are rebooted, a decision somehow takes place, and may well determine that R3 should advertise 10/8 to the new (rebooted) neighbour, at which point split horizon prevents it from being advertised back again. This means the topology table on R3 doesn't contain this route for this neighbour and is slow to converge if the other neighbour is lost.
Is there a way to control in which direction routes are advertised first on a neighbour link? and then I can let split horizon do its thing
Or is there something I am not thinking of...
many thanks,
PaulThis is what i think would work.
Two assuptions i'm making -
1) R1 and R2 have full routes in terms of the remote branch subnets which from what we have talked about seems to be the case.
2) R1 will advertise the specific subnets it is primary for (see below) to R3 which then advertises them to R2 and R2 will do the same for it's primary subnets.
R1 is primary for 32 - 63 summary address 192.168.32.0 255.255.224.0
R2 is primary for 64 - 95 summary address 192.168.64.0 255.255.224.0
Each router is secondary for the other router's primary subnets.
on R1 configure a summary address for R2's subnets on the interface connecting to R3 -
ip summary-address eigrp <AS no> 192.168.64.0 255.255.224.0
on R2 do the same for R1's subnets -
ip summary-address eigrp <AS no> 192.168.32.0 255.255.224.0
So now -
R1 points to R3 and R3 points to R2 for 192.168.32.0/19
R2 points to R3 and R3 points to R1 for 192.168.64.0/19
Because you have used a summary address this suppresses the advertisement of the more specific routes within that summary range.
R1 will therefore advertises it's specific subnets for which it is primary to R3 and a summary address only for R2's subnets.
And R2 does the same ie. it advertises it's specific subnets and a summary for R1's.
R3 then obviously passes these summaries via EIGRP to R1 and R2.
R3's routing table will have specific branch routes pointing to the respective
primary router but only a summary route for the same subnets pointing to the secondary router.
Because a router will always pick the longest match it will use the more specific subnets unless there isn't a matching route.
Which means no need to use metrics to load balance traffic.
In addition the summary route is already in the routing table so no need for either R1 or R2 to send a query to R3 if one of their branch links fail.
I may well have overlooked something so let me know whether you think this will work for you or not.
Jon -
Hi,
is it possible to use novell-named on OES 2 Linux to create split-horizon DNS server? Something like this: Two-in-one DNS server with BIND9 | HowtoForge - Linux Howtos and Tutorials. What I want to achieve is "to resolve to internal IPs when you are inside and external IPs when you are outside".
We have some services (web applications, Groupwise messenger etc.) which can be accessed from the LAN using private addresses and which are also visible from the public network (Internet).
Currently we have Netware 6.5 with DNS Proxy binded to internal address and some hostnames bound to internal IP addresses inside hosts file (and therefore resolved by DNS Proxy with private addresses for LAN clients) and named bound to public IP and serving DNS requests from public network. But we'd like to migrate everything from Netware to OES 2 Linux.
Any help is much appreciated!
BrunoOriginally Posted by joharmon
Just found this:
Is Views for DNS Supported or Possible on NetWare or OES?
Bad news but thanks for your answer!
Bruno -
Could you please let me know how SharePoint HNSC can be configured with a reverse proxy server so that HNSC Share Point URLs are not exposed to end users.
In normal path based site collections/web applications, reverse proxy configuration can be done using alternate access mappings with Public URL = "proxy URL", internal = "HNSC Share Point URL" so that share point sends response back
to Public URL = "proxy URL".
In Host Named Site Collections, alternate access mappings are not supported. Each HNSC is designed to have only one URL in each zone. Zone is one of the five zones(Default,Intranet,Internet,Custom,Extranet) with each of which only one alternate
URL is associated. This is what we are able to get using power shell command "Set-SPSiteUrl", but this will not help us to get the response back to proxy URL after a request sent to share point because we could not find any mechanism in share
point HNSC to respond to a different URL(proxy URL). Consequently, Share Point URLs are exposed to external users.
Below share point article in MSDN blog is symmetrical to what we are observing with Share Point 2013 and Proxy Server. It mentions that internal HNSC URLs can’t be hidden using any proxy server. If hiding the internal Share Point URLS is a requirement,
it suggests to use a web application instead of host named site collections.
Though I’m also observing the same behavior with Share Point 2013 HNSC, Could you please confirm my understanding is correct.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaevans/archive/2012/03/27/what-every-sharepoint-admin-needs-to-know-about-host-named-site-collections.aspx
Excerpt from above article-
"Host Named Site Collections Only Use One Host Name
Continuing on the discussion on AAMs and host named site collections, you cannot use multiple host names to address a site collection in SharePoint 2010. Because host-named site collections have a single URL, they do not support alternate access mappings and
are always considered to be in the Default zone. This is important if you are using a reverse proxy to provide access to external users. Products like Unified Access Gateway 2010 allow external users to authenticate to your gateway and access a site
as http://uag.sharepoint.com and forward the call to http://portal.sharepoint.com. Remember that URL rewriting is not permitted. Further, a site collection can only respond to one host name. This means if you are using a reverse proxy, it must forward the
calls to the same URL. If your networking team has a policy against exposing internal URLs externally, you must instead use web applications and extend the web application using an alternate access mapping."<u5:p></u5:p>Hi Satish,
You are right that only one URL is allowed for each zone of the host-name site collections in both SharePoint 2010 and SharePoint 2013.
It is by design that each host-name site collection only support one URL for each zone.
The article below is about RTM version of SharePoint, and it is the same for SharePoint 2013 with the latest CU.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2826457
So to make the URL of HNSC not exposed to external users is not supported, you need to use path-based sites instead.
Best regards.
Thanks
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected] -
Order split functionality with PP-PI
Hello Forum,
I am not sure whether we can use the order split functionality with process orders . I had implemented it earlier for a client with discrete MFG production type but not aware whether we can do so in process industry (couldn't find the provision to do so in process order operation overview screen function menu path).
Cheers
KaushikHi Kaushik,
Yes your right.
Order split functionality is only applicable for Discrete manfg not for PI industry this is major difference between PI & DM.But you can achieve this at the time of process order confirmation.
Example :-In the Goods Movement Overview of Process Order confirmation FG material is done Auto GR. This FG material Quantity needs to be splitted. Push button "Split" is provided in the bottom of the Goods Movement Overview screen of Process Order Confirmaton.
Say FG quantity = 25 KG which is to be confirmed. Client wants to split the FG quantity into 1 KG wise, for this he needs to split into 25 times.
You can implement this by using below work order
Please use the WORKORDER_GOODSMVT for splitting the GR in Confirmation
This u can implement in PI.Also check Mr.Paulo reply that could be one possibility.
check & revert.
TnX -
Split valuation with batch management and project stock
Dear Gurus,
I need to combine two following requirements:
1. split valuation with batch management (valuation type = batch number)
2. project stock
These two functionalities work fine separately but not together.
I receipt PO for material with spiit valuation on a batch level into a project stock. Posting is OK and material document (MSEG table) seems to be OK (batch number, valuation type and project stock are in this table). The problem appears when I want to display material in this valuation type (MM03) or batch (MSC3n). They don't exist!!! Short investigation showed that during goods receipt table MBEW (valuated stock) was not updated with this valuation type.
But If PO is receipt into normal stock first and then posted into project stock everything is OK.
Have you had or heart about such issue? I would appreciate any sugestion.
Thsnks in advance.
Marcin BernatHi,
As you already know ,u are using project stock and doing goods receipt against project, stock table QBEW will be updated and not MBEW. MBEW only updates in case of plant stock valuation. If u receive any goods against project stock it does not contribute to plant stock. Irrespective whether your material is managed in split valuation or not, If it is received against project stock it only updates QBEW. There is no need to update MBEW, if u r using split valuation in project. QBEW also have valuation type as another level like MBEW. If u want to see material price for project stock, it can be seen in QBEW -valuation type and not in mm03.
As u r receiving goods against project stock this is d only reason QBEW is updated and not MBEW.
QBEW will store all information like MBEW for batch number, valuation type and project stock assignment.
Hope it answers your question.
Deepak. -
My Mac Book Pro had a split drive with Windows Microsoft Access on it and it was removed when Mavericks installed. I need this so how can I go back to the old system?
Restore from the backup you had prior to installing Mavericks.
However, the upgrade should not have altered your partition scheme. Did your erase and format the drive prior to upgrading? -
Sales Return: credit memo Should generate automatically with goods reversal
DEAR SD GURUS N EXPERTS,
Currently we are using following system of Sales return.
VA01: (Order Type: RE) --> VL01N (Return Delivery) --> VL09 (Goods Reversal) --> VA01 (Request 4 Credit Memo or remove billing bloc) --> VF01 (Credit Memo)
But, now my client want a such configuration that entry of Credit memo should happen along with Goods Reversal (VL09) - Automatically. They don't want to carry out VF01 separately.
Reason behind it: Customers has credit Limit, Suppose a customer has a Credit limit of 5,00,000 and we have delivered the Material of same amount. It means all the credit limit has been used. But now He has returned the material of 2,00,000. But it will not affect the credit limit until we pass Credit memo.
Please suggest the required configuration and what we can do in such scenario. Thanks in Advance.
DSCAgain I can tell you that the process what you were following (reversing the goods receipt) is totally wrong and it will have a serious negative impact on inventory. Either you should not create a return delivery or take the stocks into parent plant. If you dont want to show in inventory, then scrap it which is a standard process.
Coming to the requirement, there is no standard way to achieve this. Check these threads where the same topic was discussed
[Re: How to set up in SAP to have automatic billing after PGI |Re: How to set up in SAP to have automatic billing after PGI]
[automatic billing|automatic billing]
You have to apply the same logic for credit note also.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
Delivery deleted with out reversing the GR in Inter company PO
Hi Ever one
Can any body suggest the below issue.
By mistake user has deleted Out bound delivery with out reversing the GR in Inter company PO
At the other end receiving site has sold the goods where I am unable to do reverse the GR bez stock is not available, even If create the delivery once again I need to do GR other wish It will be In transit.
kindly help me out
Regards
sudhaHi Kishor
yes, first Goods receipt has to be reverse, but user did mistake
After PO creation, delivery and PGI in VL02N, and Invoice in VF01 finally GR in MB0A with ref to delivery
in reverse also first GR need to be reverse in MBST and Invoice and delivery in VL09.
but by mistake delivery has bee reversed in VL09 with out reversing GR where as it is allowing to do so( this delivery had not been Invoiced )
Awaiting for your reply
Thanks & Regards
sudha -
Help with Apache Reverse Proxy configuration with SAP Portal and SAP Webgui
Dear Experts,
I have an issue configuring Apache to work with SAP Portal and ERP webgui. Accessing Portal through Reverse Proxy is working fine. But the problem arises when we try to open an iView ERP webgui transaction page from Portal with the Reverse Proxy. Have anyone implemented similar requirements and could advice on the configuration required on the Apache side? Thank youhi,
pls check the below links for reference:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/24396589-0a01-0010-3c8c-ab2e3acf6fe2
searchsap.techtarget.com/searchSAP/downloads/chapter-december.pdf
1)Learn to implement the reverse proxy filter and portal gateway in SAP Enterprise Portal 6.0 on Web Application Server 6.40.
https:/.../irj/sdn/nw-portalandcollaboration?rid=/webcontent/uuid/006efe7b-1b73-2910-c4ae-f45aa408da5b
.2 )Configuring the Portal for Your Reverse Proxy Filter Solution . ... This document describes the reverse proxy filter mechanism in SAP Enterprise ...
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/32ad9b90-0201-0010-3c8a-c900cd685f8f
3)have full reverse proxy functionality. Possibly. filter. requests. Internet ... Reverse proxy (optionally with authentication etc.) ...
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c066c390-0201-0010-3cba-cd42dfbcc8be
Note:please reward points if solution found helpfull
Regards
Chandrakanth.k -
Splitted document with folio number
Hi everyone. We have pdf file contain 600 pages. We using ART splitter for split the document as chapter level. We getting separated file start page no 1. We need splitted file start with folio number as in pdf file. Help to get splitted file with folio number.
I have reset the number range and it is now first number in the number range. With the same number I am able to create document through front end transaction.
So I do not think that is the reason for the error. -
Split joint with RESTful serivices in OSB11g
Hi
I have a scenario to implements in OSB11g
I need to call 4 end points one of them is RESTful service. I need to call in parallel.
How can i use split-join in this scenario in OSB implement for parallel processing?
Restful service is not having WSDL, here in this case can i use spli-joint to acheive parellel processing in osb if so couldyou pls let me knw how can i do this??
In short
How can i use split-join with restful service in OSB11g?
Is there otherway to achieve my scenario in OSB (in parallel)??
Quick reply is highly appriciated.
Thanks.Hi hisaak,
stage folder is always empty. And in the tmp folder following files and folders are available.
osb_server1.lok
WebServiceUtils.ser
WLinternal*
WLuser*
kindly guide which of the folders has to be cleaned.
Maybe you are looking for
-
A question of BAPI_BILLINGDOC_CREATEMULTIPLE
i have BAPI_BILLINGDOC_CREATEMULTIPLE working OK with this code: wa_vbrk-ref_doc = '0010001318'. wa_vbrk-ref_item = '000010'. wa_vbrk-ref_doc_ca = 'C'. wa_vbrk-bill_date = sy-datum. APPEND wa_vbrk . wa_text-ref_doc = '0010001318'. wa_text-ref_item =
-
Everytime i open it (several different ways) it freezes
Every time i open it whether off a mp3 click or a cd insert itunes opens and freezes on the itunes music store screen (which i didnt even click on and my internet connection is fine) It doesnt give me enough time to click on my music library and avoi
-
I am trying to export an AE CC comp into a Adobe Premiere Pro CC (2014) video project. I can not drage it from AE to Premier Pro. Is there a problem with the dynamic link between these two applications?
-
Reorder key columns in "Use for Drill down" option
I have Product Detail as the leaf hierarchy level which has Product Id and Product Name are both selected as Logical Key. When I drill down to this level in Answers, I see both Product Id and Product Name as expected. However I see Product Name as fi
-
IWeb 08 - poor color management
Since updating from iWeb 06 to iWeb 08, iWeb changed all my pictures on my webpages making them darker. Nobody asked for that...... Seems iWeb cannot handle untagged RGB. Anybody had the same problem or a solution? Cheers, Nikolaus