Split of an Access Request in GRC

Hello GRC Experts,
I have a following issue in my MSMP workflow:
I have created a MSMP workflow using detour Rule GRAC_MSMP_DETOUR_SODVIOL ar first stage. If an Access request contains SOD violations the request should be routed to Security stage. If works fine so far, but with one exception. We have requests which contain three roles, two of them have SODs and one is clean. I expect that only two roles which contain SOD should be routed to SOD path, and the role which is clean should go the normal path (No SOD path). However I am facing the situation that the whole request is routed to the SOD path and Security stage.
Do you have any idea how to solve this issue?
thank you in advance
best regards
Sabrina
Here are the screenshots from the MSMP workflow

Hi Sabrina,
we had exactly the same challenge - this is how we solve it:
- check parameter: 1073 Enable sod violations detour on risks from existing roles (recommended YES)
- routing level - make sure the stage settings (where your routing rule is executed) are set to "line item level" under MSMP Workflow configuration / Maintain paths/ maintain stage settings
Hope this helps,
Filip

Similar Messages

  • User details are missing in Access request in GRC 10.0

    Hello All,
    When we are trying to create Access request in GRC 10.0 for an user it results as user  details not found.
    Under SPRO - Maintain data source configuration we have configured 2 HR systems HR1 and HR2.
    But the User details exits in HR1 system and lies in validity also. We have tried to run the Repository Object Sync also still unable to search the details.
    But we observed even after the Sync job User details are not created in table GRACUSER and GRACUSERCONN. Is this could be the problem. Why its not updating even after the Sync job many times almost 10 times.
    We have also configured parameter 5023 to YES.Please advise.
    Thanks in advance.

    Did the sequence for HR1 set to 1 or 2, I hope you are following the suggestions given by Luciana in other thread.
    Please post your data source config screenshots otherwise.
    BR,
    Mangesh

  • Error while trying to submit Access request to GRC from IDM

    Hello
    We have SAP IDM 7.2 SP8 installed and done all the prerequisite for connecting to GRC AC 10 as in configuration document.
    We are trying to submit request to GRC using Standard GRC provisioning framework task ( AC Validation) but pass: Submit AC Request fails with error: "Pass stopped by script"
    Is there anything wrong with the script which put RoleData details since its getting aborted ?
    I tried providing Role name directly in Role data attribute inside the action task and got following error:
    Error
    putNextEntry failed
    storingcn=IDMUSR0023,ou=useraccessrequest,o=grc
    Exception from Add operation:javax.naming.NamingException: [LDAP: error code
    82 - (GRC User Access Request:82:Script execution failed)]; remaining name
    'cn=IDMUSR0023,ou=useraccessrequest,o=grc'
    I checked VDS Logs and there was one error :
    Additional message = msgcode=4;msgdescription=Mandatory field ITEM NAME  is empty in line no 1 ;msgtype=ERROR
    From where exactly ITEM NAME field value will be fetched and pass to GRC for request creation ?
    Regards
    Deepak Gupta

    Thanks Christopher
    I got my issue fixed, There was issue with my GRC Initial load job which couldn't enrich repository privileges and hence the issue was coming since script wasn't able to find GRC ROLE ID and Application ID attribute from privileges.
    Regards
    Deepak Gupta

  • Automatically reject access requests in GRC 10.0

    Hello friends,
    In PMU WF has set three escalations, when no one approves the request after a while, can automatically reject these access requests?

    You can use the Stale Request functionality to CANCEL requests that have not been worked on after x amount of days.
    Schedule ABAP GRFNMW_BATCH_STALE_REQUEST to run daily.  This is done by individual MSMP Process IDs.
    Thanks.
    Kevin Tucholke

  • GRC 10.0 Access Request Creation- Data Source of User Details

    Hi Experts,
    I was doing GRC 10.0 Configuration and found a query which I am not able to resolve.
    While creation of any kind of Access Request in GRC through NWBC> Acces Management Tab>Access Request>Access Request Creation.
    In the user details section, I can see the HR records( like Pernr, position, manager) have been visible to some extent.
    My question is where from these details came in GRC. What configuration we should maintain to achieve these HR records?
    Hope to get a quick response as this is one of the requirement of the implementation which I am doing with my customer.
    Thanks,
    Atanu

    Alessandro,
    Thanks for your response. It helped me to know certain things.
    But when I am navigating to SPRO > GRC > Access Control > Maintain Data Sources Configuration > [User Detail Data Source], it is configured with a ECC system in target connector and User data type is maintained as "SU01".
    Now my question is where from in my case the GRC is pulling the HR records (PA20) like PERNR, POSITION,PERSONEL AREA etc? SU01 does not provide these information. My ECC box is integrated with HR module, so is it taking the data from HR directly?
    Thanks in advance!
    Atanu

  • GRC 10.0: Access Request Creation - LDAP user advanced search not working

    Dear Experts,
    We are implementing SAP GRC Access Control and we have an issue in Access Request Creation. If we put the user name in “User” field and press intro, the user details are updated, but if we want to make an "Advanced search" the user is not found and the application give us the following message: “No records found for the search criteria entered.”
    Scenario 1: If we put the user name in “User” field and press intro, the user details are updated:
    Scenario 2: If we want to make an "Advanced search" the user is not found and the application give us the following message: “No records found for the search criteria entered.”
    We are using the Active Directory as Data Source.
    Thanks and Regards.

    Hi Jose,
    Try maintaning the parameter 2050 as YES and check once.
    Kindly, also make refer to  the below list of SAP notes:
    1757906 - GRC 10.0 - LDAP user search does not work in NWBC
    1745370 - LDAP search in GRC does not work anonymously
    1718242- UAM: User search not working in Access Request.
    Regards,
    Neeraj Agarwal

  • GRC 10.0 Access request Management Audit

    Hello All,
    Can Anyone let me know what  Auditors Check When they Audit GRC 10.0 Access request Management (excluding Configuration).
    Thanks
    Mohammed Wasim

    Hi,
    ARM supports key ITGC controls for user access management, so probably audit would also cover:
    - review of updated processes & controls
    - check (based on sample) if all requests were properly approved
    - review of correctness of approvers assignment
    - verification if what was requested was provisioned
    - timely removal of terminated access
    - review of SoD controls embedded in process
    - periodic review of user access
    and maybe some more controls. In most cases it will be sample based testing so auditors may ask for a sample of requests to trace them to back-end systems and opposite sample of changes in users privileges to verify if proper requests were prepared for those changes...
    Sometimes they could perform more tests on configuration and process, but this is up to particular auditor.
    Best regards, Andrzej

  • No Roles In Access Request - GRC 10 SP06

    Hello Experts ,
    With GRC 10 SP 06 ,I am facing strange issue .In Access request when I search for roles to be assigned I am not getting any result .
    I have performed all post installation system and same working with SP 05 in other landscape .
    Important steps  like running back ground jobs for user.role.profile  synch role import all is done .
    Thanks & Regards
    Ashish

    Hi,
    You have hit a similar problem I faced after moving to SP06.
    What is the value assigned to the "Role Status"? If it is not "Production/PRD", then Access request doesn't allow it to be displayed as a selectable option for assignment. Prior to SP06, this was not checked, but SP06 got updated to ensure roles that are not in Productive use status can not be assigned for usage.
    Once you change this status over in the roles you wish to make available for assignment via Access Request, you should be able to search and select them.
    Hope that helps.

  • GRC 10.1 Simplified Access Request and Remediation View Issues

    Hi Everyone,
         We recently upgraded our GRC 10.0 environment to 10.1, SP 5 and am having the following issues--has anyone else also experienced?
    In the simplified access request form, it keeps telling me to enter a “valid user ID”—even though the ID is valid and works fine in the normal access request screen. Also tried to search and then select the ID in this field with the same error.
    In the SoD Remediation view, I keep getting “No Data Found”, even though in the detail view, there are risks the same request:
    I’ve checked the following things:
    I’ve used IE 8, IE 9, FireFox, Chrome, and the NWBC to see if any of these fix the issue
    I double checked the 10.1 “upgrade guide” to make sure Gateway configurations are correct
    It looks like we are on the latest support packs:
    Any help on this would be greatly appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Brett

    Hi Brett,
    For Remediation issue you can check the below thread.
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/3574790
    Regards,
    Neeraj

  • Email content in GRC access request

    Dear Experts,
    Can any one let me know from where GRC access request email content is picked up which creating creating throught access request.?
    I.e when ever the requestor creating request, the manager will get an email( and in my scenario the email document is maintained in document maintenance(se61 tcode) ). Now i need to prefix user full name in email content(which the manager receives) with Mr./Ms.
    Thanks
    Katrice

    Hi,
    My issue is resolved my enhancing the method GET_NOT_VARS_AND_ATTACHMNTS( ) of class CL_GRFN_MSMP_NOTIFICATION
    """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""$"$\SE:(1) Class CL_GRFN_MSMP_NOTIFICATION, Method GET_NOT_VARS_AND_ATTACHMNTS, End                                                                          A
    *$*$-Start: (1)---------------------------------------------------------------------------------$*$*
    ENHANCEMENT 1  ZGRC_EMAIL_TITLE.    "active version
    DATA: lw_fullname  TYPE string,
           lw_variables TYPE grfn_s_msg_variable,
           lw_logsys    TYPE logsys,
           lw_system_id_temp  TYPE string,
           lw_user            TYPE grac_user,
           lw_return TYPE int4,
           lW_user_details    TYPE grac_s_user_detail.
           SELECT SINGLE logsys  INTO lw_logsys FROM t000 WHERE mandt = sy-mandt.
           IF sy-subrc = 0.
            lw_system_id_temp = lw_logsys.
           ENDIF.
    READ TABLE et_variables INTO lw_variables WITH KEY name = 'USER_ID'.
       IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
        lw_user = lw_variables-value.
          TRY.
                  CALL METHOD cl_grac_ad_access_mgmt=>get_user_detail
                    EXPORTING
                      iv_system_id    = lw_system_id_temp
                      iv_user         = lw_user
                    IMPORTING
                      ev_return_code  = lw_return
                      es_user_details = lw_user_details.
               CATCH cx_grfn_exception .                   "#EC NO_HANDLER
              ENDTRY.  
    ENDIF.
       READ TABLE et_variables INTO lw_variables WITH KEY name = 'USER_FULL_NAME'.
       IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
         CONCATENATE lw_user_details-address-title_p lw_variables-value INTO lw_variables-value SEPARATED BY space.
         MODIFY et_variables FROM lw_variables index sy-tabix.
       ENDIF.
    ENDENHANCEMENT.
    *$*$-End:   (1)---------------------------------------------------------------------------------$*$*
    Thanks
    KH

  • Add Fields in CUP Request - SAP GRC Access Control 5.3

    Dear Friends,
    I am wondering on how to add fields value in CUP (Compliant User Provisioning) SAP GRC AC 5.3.
    Currently i'm leading 9 SAP Security Coordinators in Indonesia and i want to create Performance Metrics on how long the CUP Requests is processed. It needs to enhance the CUP by adding value Delegation of Authority and the record no. of the DOA requests.
    Really appreciate your inputs on how to add fields value in CUP.
    Thank you so much
    -Mesti-
    Edited by: AnnisaPramesti on Jan 2, 2012 5:37 PM

    Hi.
    Check under http://service.sap.com/instguides
    SAP BusinessObjects -> SAP BusinessObjects Governance, Risk, Compliance (GRC) -> Access Control -> SAP GRC Access Control 5.3
    Cheers,
    Diego.

  • GRC Access requests - Audit Log

    Dear All, GRC access requests is noticed with Provisioning failed messages. Access Request Audit Log is displayed with " Log on Failed / CPI - CALL: ThSAPCMRCV " message ( Screen shot enclosed ). Could you please share an insight on these messages and it's resolution. Thanks raj 

    Dear Raj,
    please check with your basis team if the connection to the system works. Basically it seems like you have a connection error as the log on does not work.
    Regards,
    Alessandro

  • GRC AC 10 - Change default value for field in access request

    Hi everybody
    in Access request,  Is it possible to change the defaut value in the fied "request for" ?
    thanks
    Aurélien

    Hi Aurélien,
    Yes we can make it default, please go to EUP and there is a field Request for. please check the snapshot.
    Thanks and Regards
    Ankit sharma

  • GRC 10.0 SP 14 access request form displays unassigned roles

    Dear experts, when I open the Access Request form and I select a user, and then I click on existing assignments, I am shown a list of roles and systems assigned to this user. However, when I go to those corresponding backend systems to see if the roles are actually assigned, it turns out that they are not. I have rerun all the sync jobs and they all completed successfully. Auto provisioning works on all these systems and there are no issues in terms of the RFC. However, as indicated by the attachments, it continues to show rules that were unassigned from this user some time ago. where might these assignments be coming from?

    Hi Santosh,
    did you run the repository object sync job in full mode for this connector? This has mostly to do with outdated sync information as you can also see in the following note:
    http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1667112
    Please check again.
    Regards,
    Alessandro

  • GRC 10.1 Access Request - Provisioning Logs Not Available

    Hello guys,
    I am currently running into an issue with the user provisioning logs, the Request Approval notification which is sent to the user are at the end of an approved access request are as below and the Provisioning Logs tab is throwing a timeout error when opened.
    "Hi Varsha Upadhyay (B001193),
    The Request number : 26 , has been processed and the Request is Closed. The details are as follows:
    Provisioning failed; check provisioning log for details.
    Kind regards,
    Access Control Administrator "
    I have checked the table 'GRACREQPROVLOG'  and I see the logs available in the table, When I open the logs for a particular request no I see the below error message under the 'Prov Message' field
    "Type conflict when calling a function module (field length)"
    Similarly in SLG1, I find the following message at the end of each provisioning task that has taken place at the end of a request being approved.
    "Error in RFC; 'Type conflict when calling a function module (field length)'.
    I made sure I gave SAP_ALL to all the RFC ID's and also the WF-BATCH ID's, and the integration scenarios are also defined correctly for all the target system.
    It seems that this error is just preventing the provisioning details from being displayed in the email or in the Provisioning logs, but the user provisioning has actually taken place as expected (viewed in SU01).
    So i'm wondering even after provisioning has actually taken place successfully, why would this error occur. Does anyone know the source for this error message, please let me know what am I missing?

    Hi Narsimha,
    The error seems to be associated with wrong type being passed as a parameter to a function module.
    Can you check the field mapping for your connectors in SPRO? There might be a mismatch happenning there.
    Thanks
    Sammukh

Maybe you are looking for