Split Response without BPM
Hi,
i have a synchronous scenario:
SAP (ABAP proxy) <-> 3rd Party (http)
Is it possible to send in addtion to the (synchronous) proxy response some IDocs without use of BPM?
synchr proxy request .................-> http service
synchr proxy response...............<-
IDoc A......................................<-
IDoc B......................................<-
Regards,
Udo
Hello,
This is possible but with specific workarounds. The first one is already suggested by Rodrigo. The second one is to create a function module in R/3 that will trigger the IDOCs and then call that FM using RFCAccessor using the HTTP Response in message mapping.
Although one of the downsides of this approach is transparency e.g not visible in monitoring unless you look at the code for the fm call.
Hope this helps,
Mark
Similar Messages
-
Hi,
I have an input file shown below.
US16DCUSAJ05061UC010007042
US16DCUSAY90011UB010007057
US16 USB490011UC010007059
US16DCUSAJ06061UC010007068
US16HQUSAY90011UB010007099
We have to split the fixed length file based on the field from 7th to 10th character of each line (ie USAJ,USAY,USB4) and place them in separate folders.
These characters are dynamic.
We do not want to use BPM.
Can anyone please suggest an alternative way to split accordingly.
thanks
Pratichihi,
there are two ways you can try:
1. Multi-Mapping without BPM - Yes, itu2019s possible!
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
2. you can create an adapter module that will do the split on any conditions and then
use standard conditions in directory to show to which folder the file needs to go
(sap does not recommend message splitting on adapter module but it's possible and works if done correctly)
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk -
Message Splitting issue (without bpm)
Hi Experts,
I was currently trying to create a message split (1 message --> 2 output) using BPM like in this blog: Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure
Then i noticed that it was also possible to achieve this without using BPM (creating a interface mapping with 2 outputs, and using the interface determination with the extended option) like on this one:
Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure
(but using the structure showed in the first blog since i was just testing)
The issue i have is that even when it worked, and i see all good in the XML monitoring (SMXB_MONI) the both resulting files appear only with one field, and i can't see the others
Example from the XML monitoring:
ORIGINAL FILE: (I split based on the id 1 and 2)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns:bpm_in_MT xmlns:ns="http://bpm.com/splitting">
- <record>
- <details>
<name>Jorge</name>
<id>1</id>
</details>
- <details>
<name>Fernando</name>
<id>2</id>
</details>
</record>
</ns:bpm_in_MT>
RESULT FILE 1:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns1:bpm_out_MT xmlns:ns1="http://bpm.com/splitting">
- <record>
- <info>
<name>Jorge</name>
<id>1</id>
</info>
</record>
</ns1:bpm_out_MT>
RESULT FILE 2:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns1:bpm_out1_MT xmlns:ns1="http://bpm.com/splitting">
- <record>
- <info>
<name>Fernando</name>
<id>2</id>
<age>20</age>
</info>
</record>
</ns1:bpm_out1_MT>
HERE's the ISSUE:
Files in the FTP folder:
file1.txt with only "Jorge "
file2.txt with only "Fernando "
when the first file should have 2 fields (id is included), and the second one should be name (id and age included)
Could this be a parsing issue? i'm confused since i see no errors in the channels
I'm using 2 FTP receivers channels with Content conversion
CC_FTP_first_file_receiver:
Recordset: info
info.fieldNames name,id
info.fieldFixedLengths 15,1
info.keyFieldValue 1
info.endSeparator 'nl'
info.processFieldNames fromConfiguration
CC_FTP_second_file_receiver:
Recordset: info
info.fieldNames name,id,age
info.fieldFixedLengths 15,1,2
info.keyFieldValue 2
info.endSeparator 'nl'
info.processFieldNames fromConfiguration
I may have no use for the keyfieldvalue since i'm only saving that file in FTP, but i already removed that and it didn't change much, i still get 2 files, but only with the "name" tag on them
Any ideas??
i'm sure i'm missing something basic, but i'm don't have much experience on XML
Thanks!Hi,
This is really intersting as well as unexpected result...if you used directly the XML format then 2 fiels are created with appropriate data with all fields....
And if you used the FCC then , fields are missing...so one thing is clear that as you have already said..issue is with FCC only...
Have you tried to process only single file with FCC instead of 2 files at a time.
Also if possible try out with fieldSeperator parameter instead of FixedFieldLenghts...see whats the result...
I hope this will give you the hint...
Thanks
swarup -
Message Split without BPM - Error
Hi,
I am creating a message split scenario without BPM as per weblog <a href="/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible Split without BPM</a>
I am able to receive message in XI but after that it shows error in Integration engine.
Error Category : MAPPING
Error Code : GENERIC
I am able to see the message in SXMB_MONI with error
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">GENERIC</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>No messages created from split mapping</SAP:P1>
Please advice.
Thanks,
Sri.Hi Venkat,
I am not able to see sub-groupid in sxmb_moni.
Please see below the contents from sxmb_moni trace.
============================
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- <!-- Request Message Mapping
-->
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: sender</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender scheme external = XIParty</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender agency external = http://sap.com/xi/XI</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: receiver</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver scheme external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver agency external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_HTTP_HANDLER-HANDLE_REQUEST" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/xi/engine?type=entry</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is done by XMB !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = 67F58830CE9E11DA91CD00111120E6DB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0002</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0002</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTO6___0000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Object-Id:29EB87F0231C357A8336DDEBD574EEAB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:0CF1E1E0C5FC11DABCB9E4A50A07012B</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Step:1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:JAVA</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_filesplit_without_bpm_</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- <!-- ************************************
-->
</SAP:Trace>
Thanks,
Sri. -
How to send status message in SOAP to IDOC scenerio without BPM
Hi,
I have a SOAP to IDOC scenerio in which we require to send the status message back to user from XI that " IDOC has been sent successfully to SAP system"
We do not want to use BPM bacause of performance issues.
Can you please help me how to achieve this synchronous response without BPM.
Note: We require the status message from XI that the IDOC has been successfully posted to WESAP systemIdoc only support async behaviour. U can't get the Idoc response as per ur requirement without BPM.
Better to go for abap proxy or RFC.
Or u may get the ack till XI.
Regards,
Prateek -
Message Split -- File to Idoc Scenario - ( Without BPM )
I have multiple records coming to XI in a File and I have to create Multiple Idocs to R/3.
Due to Complexity of mapping I'm splitting Maaping step into 2 message Mappings.
A-->B
B-->C
In the 2nd Mapping step I'm doing message Split meaning for each Source record I'm creating multiple Idocs ( To be precise each record on the source becomes 4 idocs in the Target.
2nd Mapping step is as follows
Source 1..1
Sourcerecord 0.. Unbounded
field1 0..1
field2 0..1
filed3 0..1
Target
Message 1
Idoc 1.. Unbounded
Idoc Structure..
Message 2
Idoc 1.. Unbounded
Message 3
Idoc 1.. Unbounded
Message 4
Idoc 1.. Unbounded
So based on some criteria each record of Source will be mapped to 4 Messages ( 1 each under each Message )
Is it possible to do this without BPM?. Iam sending all these Idocs to same R/3 System.
Thanks for any help..RKHi,
See the blog
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
<i>Basicly we have 2 ways of handling such scenarios:
- we can use a block step and send multiple IDOCs from our BPM
- we can also do a little trick and send multiple IDOCs from the XI without a BPM
The first approach is a standard XI approach. It involves the use of a BPM
so the speed of this transfer many not be very good in case you'd like to send
hundreds or thousands of IDOCs in just one call.
The second approach uses a little trick that was mentioned several times
on the XI Froum by a number of XI developers but is still not very clear to the XI newbies.
It allows us to send multiple IDOCs without the use of a BPM. Most probably this will be your choice
if you'd like to use such 1:N (IDOCs) scenarios effectively.</i>
Please see the bwlow threads also..
IDOC Splitting
File To IDOC Thru XI
Multi-Mappings in BPM (XI 3.0)
Please let me know , your prob..is solcev or not..
Regards
Chilla.. -
1:2 Message Mapping WithOut BPM - Split mapping created no messages Error
Hi,
I am a new-bie to SAP PI and am trying out the following scenario without BPM.
Make multiple files based on Age received from input file.Input File contains Name,DOB and Output File contains Name, Age.
I want to create 2 files, one containing details of people with Age <21 and the other output file containing details of people with Age >= 21.
To acheive this,
In IR, I created 2 DT and 3 MT,1 MM with 2 Target MT,both having occurences 0..unbounded, 1 IM with 2 Target MI,both having occurences 0..unbounded
And in ID, 1 Sender Agreement, 2 Receiver Agreement, 1 Receiver Determination, 1 Interface Determination using Enhanced Interface Determination.
When i run this scenario, I am getting the following error "Split mapping created no messages"
Please let me know how can I resolve it.Oops, I did not know that.
Thanks for that information. uhuuuuuuuuuuu, atlast the message is processed and I am seeing output files created.
But, there is still one problem. My output files are created with just the following content
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<ns1:MT_2OP_File_Out xmlns:ns1="http://POC_Sec1_1IP2OP2" />
In MM, I see the output message as follows:
Message
Message1
MT_2OP_File_Out
Employee
Name
Age
Message2
MT_2OP_File_Out1
Employee1
Name
Age
The mapping done:
MT_2OP_File_Out and MT_2OP_File_Out with the Message Type element on source end.
Employee and Employee1 are mapped as
Age -> removeContext -> SplitByValue[Each Value] < 21, Map Employee
Age -> removeContext -> SplitByValue[Each Value] >= 21, Map Employee1 resp
The fields are straight maps.
Is there any basic mapping error that I am making. Please help. -
Can we do correlation (message merge) without bpm. I mean Is there any adwanced service pack which support this,so that we can avoid bpm?
Hi,
Ur subject and ur question is confusing.....
Message split means splitting the one message into N message that is 1:N
And message merge is merging the N message to 1 message N:1.
Wat u want to do...can you pls explain with example.
Correlation is a functionality provided in BPM.
Thnx
Chirag -
Can we capture HTTP response for async message without BPM?
We are in the process of migrating an XI 2.0 scenario to XI 3.0.
The scenario is as follows in XI 2.0 - SAP sends an IDoc to XI which is mapped to an HTTP request and sent to an endpoint. The HTTP response is captured and shown in SXMB_MONI.
When we migrate this scenario to XI 3.0, we do not see the HTTP response in MONI. It looks like since the incoming message (IDoc) is triggering an asynchronous message flow, the HTTP receiver is ignoring the HTTP response payload if it sees a 200 OK status code. Ideally, we would like for the HTTP response to be captured in MONI just as in XI 2.0.
Is there a way to capture the HTTP response without using a BPM to make the HTTP synchronous call? It appears that there is nothing in the HTTP receiver communication channel that we can change (to change it from asynchronous to synchronous).
Thanks for your help,
Jay Malla
SAP XI Consultant
Licensed To CodeIt looks like the problem I am having might be due to a bug in SP15. It looks like i should see the HTTP response in MONI by default. Some other people had this problem with SP 15. Here is the posting:
Re: SXMB_MONI does not show payload after upgrade to SP15
Regards,
Jay -
Splitting a Idoc message without BPM
Hi ,
I have seen several posts on this topic splitting Messages with/without BPM. But I think I did not get the currect answer so far. Here is my scenario:
We are using PI/XI 7.0 Sp 09, Idoc-XI-WM (third-party WMS systems)
SAP(Idoc) -
> XI (httpa dapter)-------> 1. Http server (WMs 1 - BS1)
> 2. Http server (WMs 2 - BS2)
> 3. Http Server (WMs 3 - BS3)
I have SAP ECC sender System and 3 receivers-WMs, 3 different Warehouse Management systems running at different warehouse locations and each warehouse is like a different system which has different IP address and etc so we defined each WMs is new Business System in the SLD.
We have a purchase Order Idoc coming from SAP ECC to XI with multiple line items, here each item may belong to one of the above 3 warehouse locations(BS) so based on the certain logic I have to split the incoming 1 PO up to 3 POs and send each PO to each warehouse location with different http adapter.
ECC- IDoc -
>(Idoc xml using Idoc adapter) XI (splitted Idoc xlm(s) using Http adapter)---->WMS
Please give your valuable inputs, I am already working on withBPM scenario but please suggest if have any good solutions with or without BPM.
Thanks,
Laxman MoluguLaxman,
Multi-Mapping without BPM is possible from SP14. Go through this url which will help you:
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
Check this threads which will also give you some idea:
Process Integration (PI) & SOA Middleware
Message Split
---Satish -
Duplicate Message ID issue in case of Multi mapping (without BPM)
Hi Experts,
I am doing one sample Example for my requirement of converting the single source message data into the multiple Target messages.
for example, when sender system is sending the 5 sale order details into a single message in PI then my Inbound proxy class of ECC R/3 receiver system must get this sale orders separately, that means inbound proxy class method must be triggered separately for 5 sale orders from sender system. for achieving this, I have used the Multi mapping concept in ESR (without BPM).
This scenario is in Asynchronous mode.
The below screen shots give the details on what I have configures so far.
IN ESR
IN ID
IN SXMB_MONI of PI
IN SXMB_MONI of ECC R/3 Receiver system (Error in Processing)
due to this error, inbound Proxy class method is not being triggered for the single Sale order details as well,
please let me know how to tackle this duplicate message ID issue when we have multiple payloads to process in a single message.
please also let me know if is there any other workaround to fulfil this requirement.
Thank you,
Regards,
JageshHi Nunu,
Check the below blog for restrictions.
Multi-Mapping without BPM - Yes, it’s possible!
Restrictions
Messages that result from the split in a mapping-based message split are sent using one AE. So only adapters running on the AE are supported. In particular, this means that target IDOC message splits are not supported since the IDOC adapter is not part of the AE.
Regards,
Praveen. -
File sender adapter:FILE to IDOC without BPM, can't see in SXMB_MONI.
Hi all
I have a FILE - XI - IDOC Async scenario without BPM.
I configured FILE sender adapter and IDOC receiver adapter. I made a mapping to transfer file data to the structure of IDOC.
Now when i am trying to load the file using command prompt, i cud see nothing in the monitoring. Whereas if i go to the communication channel monitoring of runtime workbench, i saw that CC is polling correctly and was reading the file also.
And also wen i saw in the processed folder which i mentioned in the CC configuration for the ARCHIVE DIRECTORY, i saw that file got transferred to the folder also.
I don't understand why i cant see anything in the monitoring.
Could anybody help me to rectify the problem. Is there anything i m missing ?
Regards
NainaRajesh/Amar
TCode:: SXMB_ADM->Integration engine configuration->specific configuration->runtime
Trace_Level = 3 then you can get all MONI PIPELINE Steps also
I did this change but cudn't see anything in SXMB_MONI.
This is how i have configured my process:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/FiletoMultipleIDOCSplittingwithoutBPM
But instead of IDOC splitting i have simple FILE - XI -IDOC scenario.
I have configured everything exaclty the same way it is mentioned here. But for me the process is not visible at all.
I can't even see the first request message in the monitoring.
This is the message i can see in the communication channel monitoring:
2010-05-24 09:07:41 Success Channel CC_*: Entire file content converted to XML format
2010-05-24 09:07:41 Warning Channel CC_*: Empty document found. Proceed without sending message
2010-05-24 09:07:41 Success File "/xyz/ABC.txt" archived after processing
Is there any problem with the file and that could be the reason it cant convert the file to the request message MT_REQUEST and thus am not able to see anything in monitoring.
help me guys....this is a simple process and i m stuck...its frustrating
Regards
Naina -
Error handling in File - XI - SOAP scenario without BPM
Hello!
We have a File -> XI -> SOAP scenario without BPM. The problem is that if the Web Service sends back an error XI tries to reprocess the same message again and again instead of taking the next one.
We do not want set the retry interval to NULL because most error cases are temporary connection problems and then also those messages would not automatically be reprocessed any more.
We also have to use BE instead of EO, otherwise the Web Service will not return a response. But we need the response to be sure that the processing was successful. The message volume in this scenario is quite high and we do not want to use BPM only for the error handling.
I know that from SP19 some additional adapter modules are available for async - sync scenarios without BPM. I tried to configure it like described in File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19. but it did not solve the problem. Does anybody have any other ideas? Thanks.
Regards, TanjaHi Tanja,
>>>The volume is 3000 messages/day on business days and 700 messages/day during weekends but the traffic will increase in the future
I think, you should check that out. It is assumedly only 2 days work to build a scenario:
IDoc -> BP
BP <-> SOAP/HTTP
BP -> IDoc (Acknowledgement)
In the process you need a condition branch, where you decide success or not. You need 2 Interface Mappings for filling the ALEAUD.
Just send 1000 IDocs to the Test-XI and look to performance monitoring at Runtime Workbench, to find out, how many message will be processed in one hour. Assumedly 3000 and more per day should be possible. The advantage would be to reduce number of systems (no file system) and messages (better monitoring) and using the standard (better maintenance).
>>>So you are suggesting I should use HTTP adapter and then add the SOAP header manually in a mapping?
Yes, build the SOAP envelop during the mapping. Most easy is to use XSL or, if your mapping is ready, an additionsal XSL. You can put the error into the Acknowledgement to see it in ERP transaction WE02.
Filling of ALEAUD fields:
E1ADHDR/MESTYP: original message type
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/DOCNUM: original IDoc number
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/STATUS: 68 in case of error, 53 in case of success
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/STATXT: Short description for R/3 user what has happend
I ve done such a scenario several times. That works without any problems.
Regards,
Udo -
Idoc to soap sync without bpm. is it possible? Helping me..
Hi Experts,
i have a small clarification Idoc to soap sync interface in sap pi 7.0. i created IDoc to Soap sync using BPM but some times the signals are stuck due to load issue in swpr, while reprocess those signals all going successfully to the receiver. So We are trying to eliminate BPM.
I just wanted to know Idoc to Soap sync scenario without BPM is possible or not in SAP PI 7.0?
if it is possible kindly send me the links
Regards,
Kiran polaniHi Kiran,
Could you please let us know the exact requirement. How do you want to send the response back to IDOC?
ASync - Sync Bridge with IDOC sender is not possible in PI 7.0.
If It is something like IDOC --> SOAP --> IDOC , And If the SOAP request is small then you can use SOAP Lookup in IDOC to IDOC Scenario.
In The mapping You can do a lookup and get the response from SOAP(Webservice) and map that to your Target IDOC.
This is one possible way for you without BPM in PI7.0.
Please let me know if you need more details about this.
Thanks
Jyothi A -
How to call multiple request to CRM and R/3 without BPM
Hi all
I have a scenario where a SOAP request will come to XI via webservice
I then have to call an interface mapping which has Java mapping in it(the java code is basically calling an RFC in CRM) - then i'll receive the response of interface mapping and send it back to the customer.
Step 2 :The SOAP request which i have received in the first place is to be written as a flat/xml file onto a directory for backup purpose
Step 3: there will be a separate process where the response of rfc will be fed to an IDOC request structure and send to R/3 as a dashboard IDOC.
All this is done without BPM.
So my first problem is "how to write an incoming SOAP request to a file without using BPM?? "
Second I knw that interface mapping can be directly added in Integration directory's Interface determination by making the property as enhanced but "In the Sender Service i write the Business system which contains soap comm channel and in the interface i write the outbound synchronous interface which is the SOAP outbound that hits the xi for the first time But i am not sure what service do i write in the receiver section as Interface mapping is in XI only....theres no other business system or communication channel involved in between."
I really need help...plz help meYes abhishek
Client dont want BPM involved as it makes the process really slow
First of all i wanna knw how to use enhanced option in an interface determination....in the ID
as i am trying to load my interface mapping but it says no object found
I am giving you the structure of interface mapping
MI_OB_SAX_MAP (outbound async source interface of interface mapping )
MI_IB_SAX_MAP (inbound async target interface of interface mapping)
MT_OB_SAX_MAP (source message)
JavaClass - test_java/sax_map (Java mapping program)
MT_IB_SAX_MAP (target message
Now when i am trying to configure this in ID
BS__ (Sender business system)
MI_OS_TEST_JAVAMAP (sender SOAP interface)
But i dnt what receiver business system should i select in receiver service ??
as the java mapping is calling RFC inside the code...so no other business system involved
i m stuck.....if u could plz have a look into it
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to find out Locks on the database objects
how to find out Locks on the database objects
-
Serial number copy functionality when creating return orders from standards
Hi all, Serial number is not copying when i create return order from the standard orders in below scenario. I implemented one BADI for copying Serial number to Sales order when doing Post goods receipt. So after doing inbound delivery and PGR, serial
-
Problem with rendering still frame capture in FCP7
I'm a hack, so let's keep that in mind as I ask this question....but I *did* try to look through the forum for a similar issue before I created this post. My situation: I am pulling some HD video from a Canon Vixia into FCP and basically just piecin
-
Problem in Message Type in Distribution Model
I am trying to add a message type to a Distribution view(TCODE BD64). I am doing this on the R3 side. So it is asking for Message Type and it looks like I can't just type anything in there. Actually I am just trying to implement the starter kit menti
-
Unable to resolve component to compilation
I am using the FB4 beta 2 with the latest stable build (4.0.0.13875) and am unable to use components within the same library project. I have created a simple project as an example with two components, Simple and Composed. They both extend s:Group.