Split Valuation - Change Valuation Type

Good morning...
I have configured split valuation for some materials by Quality Valuation Category.
Now I need to change from 'NEW' Valuation Type to 'USED' Valuation type and assign the cost of the movement to a cost center.
So I need to know the procedure for a transfer of a material 'X' from valuation type 'A' to the same material with another valuation type 'B'...
Is this possible? With what kind of movement? or should create my own?
Thank you very much for the help

Ok thanks everyone for your answers.
Finally I solved the problem with movement 309.
The problem was that the cost center was not captured by the accounting document.
This is because a flag must be activated at the account determination in OMWN transaction.
The flag 'Check Account Assignment' passes the cost from the Material Document to the Accounting Document.
This flag was deactivated for movement 309, and when I activated it, the cost center entered in MIGO was automatically taken by the accounting document.
Thanks again for your tips.

Similar Messages

  • Split valuation type pick up in MRP run according to BOM

    Dear experts,
    We are starting to use split valuation scenario. Initially we have customize split valuation as standard  i.e.
    1) Creation of valuation type
    2) Creation of valuation category
    3) Assignment of cat. and type.
    4) Local definition.
    5) Assignment of valuation category in material.
    6) Extend material with valuation type.
    What i have customized and tested is working fine. Recently our user have a requirement that, valuation type field should be available in BOM for their clear understanding. Accordingly we have enhance the BOM screen and added valuation type to be choose by user during BOM creation. exit used PCSD0002.
    Now here is issue.-
    I have parent X and its child Y with valuation type SKF, BOSCH and NRB. I have fixed/specify valuation type BOSCH in BOM. If we run MRP for the parent, system should have to create purchase requisition for child with only specified valuation type in BOM i.e. with BOSCH in this case.
    Note - We cant use default proc. valuation type in customization as customer requirement is frequently changes also user specified that, system must have to select valuation type specified in BOM and create proposals accordingly both for PIR and dependent requirement.
    Please suggest.
    With best regards,
    Manish K. Bachate

    Hi
    You would be very much able to valuate both the stocks separately with what I have recommended
    But, with what you are doing, you wont be able to... Reason being, once you release std cost for the externally procured item, say, 5 USD... It will keep on valuating the item at 5 USD only.. Any price other than 5 invoiced by the vendor would hit the Price diff account OR you will have to revise your std cost every time the vendor changes his price
    Ideal way would be to keep price control V in the valuation type "External Proc"... With this, you dont need to release std cost for it and also it would valuate the stock at whatever price supplied by the vendor.. Whether 5 or 6 USD
    > To summarize, what I am recommending is this
    > 1. Your material in this case will have 3 accounting view... [One parent view and One view for IN HOUSE and one for "External Proc"
    > 2. Parent view will have Price control V, IN HOUSE will have S and External Proc has V
    > 3. In IMG settings for split valuation, earmark IN HOUSE for internal proc and External Proc for purchase
    With this
    1. Your IN HOUSE stock will be valuated at std cost released by CK24
    2. Your External Proc stock will be valuated at the price supplied by the vendor
    Hope this helps!!
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Material Ledger with Split Valuation Type 'X' with FIFO

    Hi,
       The requirement from the customer is to have Raw Material, Intermediary and Finished Products valued at Actuals and on a FIFO basis. According to me, this is possible only if we activate Material Ledger, have batch split valuation u2018Xu2019 as the valuation type and have a batch search strategy which does a FIFO. Are there any technical issues with this solution? Or is there a better solution? Is any organisation ever using this solution for a similar requirement? As an extension of this requirement, how does commodity trading companies running in SAP handle their inventory and COGS valuation?
    Thanks and Regards
    Shivram.

    Hi,
    Using Material Ledger with batch management and split valuation of each batch ("X") leads to most aaccurate FIFO valuation result, however, depending on how many material and batch the customer has, huge number of materials will be processed and it will affect the performance issues. You should check the number and expected period-end time frame scheduling at least.
    Financial responsible tell you to need this kind of solution (detailed FIFO calculation)?
    They usualy needs to get simple FIFO valuation, meaning they don't care each individual logistic material movement as FIFO, but only care of periodic FIFO. I know, it depends on Finacial responsibes or their auditors, so it's also not general.
    Please double-check the new FIFO valuation function for Material Ledger with using Periodic Closing and AVR. Some information is in SAP Note 1431829 and 1247053. Related transactions are there, CKLMBB_xxxx under Actual Costing/Material Ledger -> Balance Sheet Valuation Procedures. I couldn't find any official documents for Material Ledger + FIFO valuation (like Release Notes).
    Hope this will be an additional option to yours.
    Best regards, Takashi

  • Remove Split Valuation in Material Master

    Hi,
    We need to remove the Batch Management & Split Valuation Type from Material Masters. I already got notes to guide me in the removal of Batch Management, but i can't seem to find any for removal or split valuation. How do I do this?
    Thanks,
    Jograd

    Hi,
    What1s your problem exactly?
    If your goods have no history you can change your settings in MM02 / MM17(?).
    If your goods have history mass change is questionable...since the goods have to meet certain conditions to be able to change their settings. I think in this case you have to 'repair' them on-by-one...
    e.g.
    - you have to eliminate their stock in previous and current period (MB1A201posting date in the past > after change use MB1A+202 to reset their stock levels)
    - eliminate opem transactional data
    - archive batch master records
    /In MM02 please change the setting > you will get error message > 'Display errors' button will appear > click on it.../
    BR
    Csaba

  • Split valuation combination with serial number

    Dear all,
    Suppose the  material with serial number is having the split valuation types E.g. C1(New), C2 (Reconditioned), C3 (Reconditioning reqd) is to undergo refurbishment activity. The C1 Conditioned material was already issued to the cost center (Say Serial no.s 1 to 4) .After some period, these four materials are to be refurbished. Now for doing the refurbishment, i have to move these materials into the store.
    1.Which movement type can be used to move into the store.
    2.Which valuation type should be used while moving into the store. (We would have given the valuation type C1 (New) while issued into the costcenter at the begining).
    3.Can we move these materials with the same serial number with the valuation type C3. (After some usage, definitely the condition of the material would have changed).
    Plz reply,
    Regards,
    Suresh.

    Dear Seenuvasan,
    The material is not having Batch management activation. Also it is not asking any Batch data while doing MIGO.
    Any other setting related to S.No+ Batch + Split valuation to be checked?
    Regards,
    Suresh.

  • SPLIT VALUATION - EXT/INT PO Indicator- OMWC

    Hi,
         Could someone help me understanding this?
         While Configuring Split Valuation, for a Valuation Type I've set the 'EXT PO' indicator as '0' and associated it to a Valuation Category( No default Valuation Type has been set). After associating the Valuation Category and the Valuation Types to a material, I tried creating a PO for the same. It allowed me to create a PO, with the Valuation Type for which the EXT PO is set as '0'.
    What I inferred from the settings is that it should have thorwn an error. Have I inferred correctly or else am missing out somewhere. Also, please help me to understand the significance of 'Acct Category Reference' in 'OMWC' Tcode (P.S: Could appreciate the use of Acct Categ Ref in Automatic Account Determination ie Valuation Class determination. But the Significance of Acct Categ Ref. in Split Valuation Type still remains vague.)
    TIA,
    Regards,
    S. Satish

    Hi Prabhu,
      Thank You very much for your time.
                      The Valuation Type is as follows
                       INDI     EXT PO Indicator '0'.
                    The Valuation type 'INDI', got defaulted from the Inforecord in the PO created. The PO is a standard PO.
                  Since for 'INDI', the EXT PO is set as '0', ie Not allowed, should I expect an error in this case ( In actual it did not occur. I            suppose it should. Correct me if am wrong).
    Acct category Reference is concerned:
         Is it that the Acct Category Reference chosen in the Valuation Type configuration, would surpass the Acct Category ref set for the Material Type?
    Ie) if the Acct category ref for 'ROH' is say 0001. If I assign this Material Type for a material and still could I assign a Valuation Category associated to say HALB ( I know in real time, its not possible. But would like to understand if the system validates).
    Regards,
    S. Satish

  • Split valuation

    Dear All,
    Will split valuation of the material also address the below points. I have 2 valuation types with me as "X" & "Y" with the same material code.
    1. I need the split valuation type either "X" or "Y"  to be printed on my Purchase order.
    2. Report/list of consumption of "X" & "Y" materials separately on the balance sheet.
    3. Separate storage and stock identification in SAP for the split valuation types "X" & "Y".
    4. Report the list of materials with split valuation type either "X" or "Y" seperately.
    Are the above requirements possible.If so how? Pl guide me.
    Thanks in advance.
    Aditya

    Hi,
    1)Possible ,You will have to modify your PO Pront program accordingly
    2) Report and list of consumption as per valuation type available in STD.SAP reports may be some financial reports you amy need to modify to suit your reqmt.
    3)You will have to identify these storage locations yourself physically in system stock will be shown seperately as per valuation type
    4)All reports are available in std.SAP as per split valuation
    check transaction SAP1 or any SAP menu reports
    Hope its clear to you
    BR
    Diwakar
    reward if useful

  • Fields in MIGO - BATCH and Valuation Type

    Hi all,
    I would like to know the meaning of the following fields in MIGO.
    BATCH - Charg
    Valuation Type - Bwtar
    Which is the impact of each field?
    Should they have the same value in TRA MIGO?
    Which means that only the BATCH field is entered and the Valuation Type empty?
    Thanks you very much!!

    valuation type  comes into the game If a material is subject to split valuation.
    you can for example split the valuation based on origin, e.g. internal produced and external procured.
    this is more a financial thing.
    the batch is the level to segragate the stock of a material. e.g. each GR can be a new batch. so you can manage the stock by FIFO rules and by shelf life.  this is a logistics thing.
    Both can be used on their own, or together.
    if you want manage your materials by batches, but dont need split valuation, then you only have to take care about batch number, and the valuation type field in the batch record stays empty.
    if you manage material by batch and you use split valuation, then the split valuation type is a mandatory field in the batch record and you may have to enter batch and valuation type, but usually the valution type is defaulted from customizing.
    The tricky part is if you only use split valuation, because then the valuation type becomes the batch number. this is sometimes a bit confusing.

  • Split Valuation by Origin

    Hi MM Gurus,
    I am new to Split valuation, i have configured Spit Valuation for Import and created two valuation types as Italy and france. i have activated for my plant. I have created a material and assigned two valuation types for the same material, with same valuation class and different Moving average price.
    Here i want to know in which way it will effect my Process? What i need to check and how i have to proceed further. please guide me. what is the steps i need to do after creating a material.
    Thanks in advance,

    Hi,
    Once you have maintained the split valuation type for the materials, you can maintain the stocks, manage the inventory and transactions as per the valuation types craeted.
    1] You can also add valuation type in PO, PR to differentiate these two types of materails
    2] As GR will be done against such PO, stocks will be automatcally updated as per valuation types entered.
    3] While Issuing or despatching the same material, you can provide selected valuation type.
    There will be seperate entries for these two valuation types for the same material since MAP, Valautaion class are different for these two valuation types.

  • Inforecord for Split valuated materials

    Hi all,
    How can i maintain different prices for split valuated materials
    For Eg.  I have a material split valuated based on its Quality vendor supplies two diff quality materials with different prices
    how to maintain the prices in inforecords or any alternative to maintain both the prices.
    With regards,
    Krishna

    hi..
    Split valuation is for Valuation Purpose only...
    SAP does not support....Procuring same material with Diff. Split Valuation Type from Single Vendor is not allowed by SAP standard..
    You cannot Maintain Purchase Info for Material which is having 2 Split Valuation type......with One Vendor......
    Because For One vendor and One material combination, you can maintain One split valuation type only....
    Hope it works..
    Thanks..

  • Valuation Type for Material

    Hey Guys,
    How do we check whether split activation is activated for the material. And if its activated, how do we configure it?
    Thanks  a bunch

    Hi Ryan
    1. to check if split valuation is activated
    please use the T code OMW0
    here you can see if the split valaution is acatiavte in you system
    2. for the material you can go to T code then in MM60 reprot you can see the different valuation types ( or split valuation types )
    for configuration of split valaution please refer below
    link:[http://www.sap-img.com/mm025.htm]
    link:[http://www.sapficoconsultant.com/Bonus/Split%20Valuation%20configuration.pdf]

  • FIFO valuation at period end + consideration of valuation type

    Hi,
    I use FIFO valuation to valuate my raw materials at period end.
    Some raw materials are split valuated, e.g. the same material number can have valuation type NEW or REP (repaired). All material movements (e.g. goods receipt) happen for each valuation type at different cost (REP is much cheaper than NEW). Also purchase orders are created at movement type level.
    Unfortunately FIFO valuation does not work based on valuation type. Thus the FIFO value can be a wrong mixture of valuation type values for each material.
    Example: Starting with zero quantity/value at period begin
    Posting date
    Movement type
    Valuation type
    Quantity
    PO-Value/MAP
    05.07.2014
    101
    NEW
    500
    500 EUR
    10.07.2014
    101
    REP
    1000
    100 EUR
    15.07.2014
    261
    REP
    -500
    -50 EUR
    Total at period end
    1000
    550 EUR
    The stock value of this 1000 items is 550 EUR, the 500 items NEW have a value of 500 EUR, the 500 items REP have a value of 50 EUR.
    FIFO result:
    The 1000 items at month end are FIFO valuated based on the last goods receipt happend on 10.07.2014 which is exactly 1000 items (not considering the different valuation types).
    Thus the FIFO value is only 100 EUR although the correct value should be 550 EUR.
    I didn’t find a solution in SAP standard (FIFO related table MYMP does not contain BWTAR (valuation type) whereas table MYMFT does but its always empty in my case), but is there a solution for that case, maybe I missed it in some EhP’s?
    Best regards, Christian

    Hi,
    There is no such normal MRP run.
    Whenever we take MRP run, system will consider only the main material and not the split valuation type.
    THe main concept of using split valuation is only for that itself. It is there for planning irrespective of valuation type.
    But if you want the system to behaive in such fashion that it should plan one part and not he other then use different material code instead of split valuation. Define these two material codes as alternative and give the usage probability as 0% and 100%. MRP will consider only that material which is having 100% usage probability.
    Regards
    Amit Parkhi

  • Split valuated material price change at header level (without val. Type)

    Hi All,
    Need to change Split valuated Material Price at Header level (without val. type).
    In MR21 valuation type is mandetory for split valuated material.
    Please suggest on changing Material price without val. type.
    Thanks

    You have to advise the users who create accounting views to enter a valid price when they create a material master. Maybe you need to make use of the user exit to prevent saving when no price (or a dummy 0,01)  is entered.
    It is not possible to change the header price with any SAP given transaction, as it could cause inconsistencies if you dont take care about the stocks at valuation type level.
    you may have to deveope an own report on own risk. I personally have the opinion that it is more secure to post stock and reverse it again (which just creates to accounting documents that equalize each other, no remaining value anywhere) than going the risk with an own program to screw up the valuation of a material  in general

  • Material type change for split valuation

    We have to change to material type for materials having split valuation.
    Suggest the required

    The material type is stored in table MARA, however, MM17 can not change all fields that are contained in a table. MM17 is not a table modification tool, it just supports business process of mass changing some field contents. It is more like mass process MM02. But the fields that cannot even easily changed in MM02 like base unit of measure, batch managment flag are not supported within MM17. Material type cannot even be changed in MM02.
    There are that many checks that need to be performed and cause a failure, that you cannot do such in a mass change transaction.
    It is certainly possible to record MMAM to finally do this with batch input, CATT or LSWM for many materials. But first try it manually for 10-20 materials to make your experience.
    By the way, dont forget the number range. If you change material type, then the material number will remain, which may screw up your number range logic (that is often defined after heavy and long discussions. If you have different number ranges per material type, then you should block the transaction MMAM for anybody)

  • Change Valuation Type for Batch  (Split valuation)

    We have a batch record created automatically during a goods receipt for PO.  The Valuation type on the batch record is "New".
    I'm trying to change the valuation type to "Trial" having retrieved the record (MSC2N) entering the material number, batch number, plant and storage location.
    Having changed the valuation type theres a warning "Change of valuation type - check open process"
    After entering through the warning then saving,  I hit an error - "please enter stor. location".  I already entered the storage location to retrieve the record so it's displayed, and can't see where else to enter it?  Can anyone help please?
    Thanks in advance

    I managed to overcome this error aided by OSS note 215850, by entries i've made in table T156.  However theres a new error
    "Error 3 in posting for status change" M7 661.  OSS note 958105 refers to it, but my settings mirror the note.  So stumped as to a resolution
    Help anyone?
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for