Split Valuation: changing price

All SAP gurus,
We are maintained split valuation for raw materials.
For this we have created two separate valuation classes namely 3000 and 3001 for domestic and imported materials.
While creting material master record, we have entered valuation category as split valuation in accounting 1 view, but wwe have not maintained moving average price here.
Then we extended the same material for two different valuation categories, and also maintained their respective prices.
But we have not uploaded the stock for this material so system is not picking up the price.
Now we are unable to change the price as moving avg price field becomes gray.
Also in MR21 system ask for valuation category.
can we change the material price without uploading the stock?
Please reply.
Regards,

hi,
You can't chsnge it till you move the stock to other place or remove the stock...
For spplit valuation mostly MAP is only used....
hope it helps...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Similar Messages

Split valuated material price change at header level (without val. Type)

Hi All,
Need to change Split valuated Material Price at Header level (without val. type).
In MR21 valuation type is mandetory for split valuated material.
Please suggest on changing Material price without val. type.
Thanks

You have to advise the users who create accounting views to enter a valid price when they create a material master. Maybe you need to make use of the user exit to prevent saving when no price (or a dummy 0,01) is entered.
It is not possible to change the header price with any SAP given transaction, as it could cause inconsistencies if you dont take care about the stocks at valuation type level.
you may have to deveope an own report on own risk. I personally have the opinion that it is more secure to post stock and reverse it again (which just creates to accounting documents that equalize each other, no remaining value anywhere) than going the risk with an own program to screw up the valuation of a material in general

Split valuation and price control

Dear all,
Case :the price control for mat'l type MAIN is defined as S in IMG,
mat'l no.A with mat'l type MAIN,
test 1:
In plant 01, A with price control S
In plant 02, A with price control V, valuation category X, problem is when I create a PO in plant 02 with mat'l A,when goods receipt, the accounting docs is wrong(D:price difference, C:GR/IR), the debit should be inventory account, it should not hv price diff with price control V under this situation,
test 2,
In plant 02, A with price control V, without valuation category,the acounting document when goods receipt is correct.
test 3,
changed the price control for mat'l type MAIN to V in IMG,
In plant 02, A with price control V, valuation category X, when goods receipt , the accounting document is correct also.
I doubt why this happen, do the split valuation or valuation category X effect?or there's any priority abt price control?
Urgent, can anyone instruct me? thanks in advance, will assign points, thanks.
kathy

Hi, Kathy:
The price control in master data of material have the priority.
Besides, I guess the error happened is due to the incorrect valuation area configuration. If your valuation area is set to company code level, the system will use the same valuation method within a company code.
In this case, you need to set the valuation area as plant level to differentiate the valuation methods between different plants.
Hope it's helpful for you!

Split Valuation- Net Price Problem in Po

Dear All,
       The Split Valuation confiigured for Material as
       Val Type(A)- Ex Procurement
       Val Type(B)- Internal House Production.
assigned Valuation Category(C) with A & B and with Plant.
In Material Master Accounting view enter all the reqired inputs
First i Created PR and its ok and go for PO, it asking " net Price" and entered the Net Price, again it showing error msg " net price greater than 0.
Note: for this material PIR, Source List require or not.
       so what i done a mistake? and can any one explain it.
Thanks

net price always remains exclusive freight/delivery cost.
the freight/delivery cost gets added on the net price
so going by logic the calculation which ur system is showing is perfect.
"Re PO: As per you, only net value will be displayed in PO and effective price will not display . why?"
this is becoz it shows the price of that particular material per unit.
regards,
indranil

Split Valuation - Change Valuation Type

Good morning...
I have configured split valuation for some materials by Quality Valuation Category.
Now I need to change from 'NEW' Valuation Type to 'USED' Valuation type and assign the cost of the movement to a cost center.
So I need to know the procedure for a transfer of a material 'X' from valuation type 'A' to the same material with another valuation type 'B'...
Is this possible? With what kind of movement? or should create my own?
Thank you very much for the help

Ok thanks everyone for your answers.
Finally I solved the problem with movement 309.
The problem was that the cost center was not captured by the accounting document.
This is because a flag must be activated at the account determination in OMWN transaction.
The flag 'Check Account Assignment' passes the cost from the Material Document to the Accounting Document.
This flag was deactivated for movement 309, and when I activated it, the cost center entered in MIGO was automatically taken by the accounting document.
Thanks again for your tips.

Split Valuation with two Standard Cost

Hello,
I have one question regarding split valuation where i need to keep both the valuation type as standard price, in that case how to calculate and release cost for valuation type. Logically keeping both is not pheasible. But want your experience how this is beed handled by others.
Thanks

Hi,
If one material has split valuation, standard price will be released only for header segment (valution type blank). You have the possibility to release standard price for in-house production segment, if you set the 'Default'-flag in the customizing transaction for splitted val. (OMWC) for the val. category 'X'.
Please read the note 552486 that contains information about this context.
Alternatively you might create a mixed cost estimate to release prices for each procurement alternative that is associated with a val. type.
The only way to mark and release a standard costing per valuation type is by using the functionality of mixed costing. That means that you have to define a quantity structure category and define a procurement alternative based on a valuation type of your material. Afterwards you have to define a mixing ratio for your material and the defined quantity structure category.
Based on this master data (procurement alternatives and mixing ratios) it is possible to carry out a mixed costing, one part of this mixed costing should be a cost estimate based on your valuation type. If you mark and release the mixed cost estimate the system will set the standard price on valuation type level (prerequisite: you have defined the procurement alternative based on the valuation level).
regards
Waman

Split valuation Mass Update in Production

Dear Experts,
We have activated split valuation as valuation category u201CCu201D and valuation Type u201CC1u201D u201CC2u201D & u201CC3u201D. Now we need to upload this valuation category & valuation type for the existing material in Production. What is correct procedure to do mass updates for the existing material in Production.
Please advise me.
Thanks & Regards
RS

Hi,
I suspect it won't be an easy job to do...
You have to eliminate several problems:
- make the stock level to zero in current and previous period (MB1A + 201 + posting date in the past (practically the last day of previous period); then reset the stock level by MB1A + 202); if goods movement have taken place in the current period, you have to cancel them
- delete all transactional data (PrdOrd, PldOrd, TR , TO, PCN, PO, PurReeq, etc)
- archive batch master records
- etc
In case of one material you can bump into several problem, much more in case of mass change...
I wpould suggest that you should try to change some goods one-by-one, to get insight what problemes may occur.
If you can categorize your goods and make necessary preparation well, you have chance to achieve your goal.
Please search for threads of split valuation change on the forum.
Regards,
Csaba

Split valuation-Preliminary Cost estimate

Hello,
Is it possible to create a Prelimnary cost estimate for split valuated material.Relevant Proc alternaitves crtd
Pls help

Hi,
In the case of split valuation only header and not the valuation
type is costed.
If one material has split valuation, standard price will be released
only for header segment (valution type blank). You have the possibility
to release standard price for in-house production segment, if you set
the 'Default'-flag in the customizing transaction for splitted val.
(OMWC) for the val. category 'X'.
Please check the note 552486 that contains information about
this context. (Question 10).
Alternatively you might created mixed cost estimate to release prices
for each procurement alternative that is associated with an val. type.
The only way to mark and release a standard costing per valuation type
is by using the functionality of mixed costing. That means that you
have to define a quantity structure category and define a
procurement alternative based on a valuation type of your material.
Afterwards you have define a mixing ratio for your material and the
defined quantity structure category.
Based on this mastr data (procurement alternatives and mixing ratios)
it is possible to carry out a mixed costing, one part of this
mixed costing should be a cost estimate based on your valuation type.
If you mark and release the mixed cost estimate the system will
set the standard price on valuation type level (prerequisite:
you have the define the procurement alternative based on the
valuation level)
For more details please have a look in the R/3 documentation for
mixed costing or contact your consultant.
Please refer to NOTE 552486 (FAQ):
"Question 10: In the case of a split valuation, why can the prices only
be updated in the internal segment?
Answer:In the initial standard SAP System, only the header segment is
calculated and the price is updated only here.However, if the "Valuation
type 'in-house production' mandatory" flag is set for the categories in
Customizing (Transaction OMWC), it is also possible to update the price
in an internal segment.For external segments (procured externally) this
does not make any sense in general.However, mixed costings can also be created and updated for several segments via procurement alternatives."
Setting this flag will take impact on materials WITH split valuation
in the future. New prices will be released for the in-house segment
in addition to header segment in TA CK24.
Also check the online documentation related to this topic
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/
EN/34/f4af26be4411d1898f0000e8214595/frameset.htm
I hope the above information is of use to you.
MLM

MR21 price changes for split valuation materials

HI
I have changed the material price for the material whcih are maintained with split valuation ie. in MR21 i could able to change the price for valuation types only.. i'm not able to change the main material price , its asking to enter the val type?? how to change the the price ?
Ex . Mat code : MAT 123, having val types as IN and OV, which has price control of S, here i have changed the price for the val types IN & OV, but i'm not able to change the price for the main material MAT123, which has price control V?? how to change it

hi Samuel,
We have a similar case, need your help;
Case: Split valuation is activated but parent has price control "V" and child i.e. diff valuation types have "S". We want to make std prices of all valuation types "0". It is done but the parent still shows value in MAP.
a. How do we make MAP of parent as "0" (price control "V")
b. Will it impact and how e.g. MB5L
c. Is it ok if we ignore the valuation of parent
d. All valuation types under parent are made "0"
Thx
Bhushan

Price change for Material Maintained with Split valuation

Hi Gurus,
Scenario is like this :
Material with Valuation type is : Rs.50.
Material W/o Valuation type is : Rs. 0 ( This is done at the time creating material master).
Now i want to correct Rs.0 to Rs.40.
When i try to change price through MR21, system is asking to input valuation type.
Is it not possible to change price for material W/o Valuation type (ie blank one), if material is Split Valuated ?
Thanks

Hi,
if the materila is split valuated then u have to enter valuation type because inthe accouting view you hav edefined valuation type and at that level only it stores the price.
I think you wants to change the price at valuation category level , if this is so then it gets updated automatically thru prices maintained at all the valauation type levels.
Hope it clarifies ur doubt.
reward if useful
Rohit

How to estimate two products price in split Valuation

hello, everyone,
Our factory have Two equipments , one is a new equipment A , the other is an old equipment B,
they all produce the prodcut W , but the old equipment B consume electricity ,warm water and Raw material is much more than the new equipment A. So the cost price of product W is different when they were produced by equipment B and equipment A.
the Finacial Department and Sales Department want to know different cost price of product W via different equipments in the end of every month. Now we use two different material NO to deal with it(actually it is one product ) ,but this method take a lot trouble to stock, because one product quantities were seperated by different material NO in Storage location.
According to this requirement, we activate the split valation, but the customizing of split valuation just supply one field for val.type in-house prod, at the same time , the t-code CK11N screen has not the field vauation type. if we don't estimate the material cost price by CK11N, when we create sales billing ,the system can not post COPA document and give a error that is :“Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "1180119998"
   may you have a good method to deal with this type of business or you ever met this kind of business . may you share it , I appreciate you for your help !!!
    Davis
    Best&Regard.

Hi
You can change the same through MR21
regards
Sanil

Change materail master from non-split valuated to split valuated (E M3 194)

Valuation category cannot be added in the accounting 1 view when stock is available in the previous period. Is there a way to overcome this?
This is the situation. We have stock materials that are not defined as split valuated until the business requires so. Valuation category cannot be added in the accounting 1 view if stock is available. In this case we issue the stock out, add the valuation category and then return the stock again as split valuated now. However, we still get error M3 194 since we have stock available in the previous period.
Thanks.

Hi,
I did not find a solution to allow you to change split value back and forth. The SAP check is hard coded and there is nothing you can do about it. However, I found a trick to be able to change it back and forth.
1. Compare your stock figures in this period with the previous period (MM03 accounting view).
Previous period: 20 EA; value $200; MAP $10
Current period: 12 EA; value $144; MAP $12
2. You need to receive/issue stock in the current period to make quantity and value the same in both periods. We have configured special movement types (copy from 501 and 201) to allow pre-priced movements. You only need to make the amount field required for these new movement types.
In this example execute a 501 (use the custom movement type) to receive in the current period 8 EA with a total value of $56. After the movement this is what you have:
Previous period: 20 EA; value $200; MAP $10
Current period: 20 EA; value $200; MAP $10
Accounting: Inv +56
                  Exp -56
3. Make sure you allow posting to the previous period.
4. Issue stock out (201) using postind date in the previous period. After the movement this is the situation:
Previous period: 0 EA; value $0; MAP $10
Current period: 0 EA; value $0; MAP $10
Accounting: Inv -200
                  Exp +200
5. Change your material to split value or non-split valued (MM02)
6. Receive stock back in this period. You need to use the pre-price movement type. Receive the quantity and value so you have the same quantity and value you currently have in stock. In this example we should receive 12 EA with value $144. After the movement this is what you have:
Previous period: 0 EA; value $0; MAP $10
Current period: 12 EA; value $144; MAP $12
Accounting: Inv +144
                  Exp -144
Hope it helps.
Regards, Jose Oyon.

Only price control "V" is possible for split valuation'

Hi
For semi finished items price control has been assigned as 'V'.when i am trying to change the same to S' I got the error message is"Only price control "V" is possible for split valuation''.Even i checked and corrected the MRP views in Material master.
Can any one help me to sort out this issue
Regards,
P.Selvakumar

Hi,
I guess that you are getting the error message M3 185 ('Only price control "V" is
possible for split valuation').   This message is correct.
ONLY materials with Moving Average Price can use the split valuation
function.
The reason is the following one:
If there are 2 valuation types, named X and Y.
There is an equality:
Material pricetotal quantity = Price Xquantity X + Price Y*quantity Y
In order to balance,
When X and Y is 'V', the header material should use 'V'.
When X is 'V', Y is 'S', the header material should use 'V'.
When X and Y is 'S', the header material should use 'V'.
So only price control V is possible for split valuation.
In accordance with the text of the message M3185, split valuation
requires the price code 'V' (moving average price) for the header
record.
Please, refer to the SAP Library (http://help.sap.com) documentation
under the menu path (for your current release level, 470):
MM - Material Price Change (MM-IV-MP)
-> Split Valuation
   -> Creating Material Subject to Split Valuation
"Creating Material Subject to Split Valuation:
1. First create a valuation header record for this material. This is
   where the individual stocks of a material are managed cumulatively.
To do this, fill in the Valuation category field on the accounting
   screen when you create the material master record and leave the
   Valuation type field blank. In the Price control field, enter V
   (moving average price), since a moving average price is constructed
   in the valuation header record from the values and quantities of the
   individual stocks. When you save, the system creates the valuation
   header record.
2. Then create the material for a valuation type.
   To do this, call up the material in creation mode again. Due to the
   fact that a valuation header record exists, the system requires you
   to enter a valuation type for the valuation category.
3. Repeat step two for every valuation type planned."
In order for the system to take into account the different values of
the substocks, the material at the header level must necessarily have
a 'moving average price' (V) control.
Regards,
MLM

MM42 change material, split valuation at batch level, M301, locking table

Dear All,
I'm working on ECC 6.0 retail and I have activated split valuation at batch level. Now in MBEW for this specific material I have almost 14.400 entries.
If I try to change some material data (MM42) I receive an error message M3021 A system error has occurred while locking and then Lock table overflow.
I used SM12 to see the table (while MM42 is still running) and it seems that MBEW is the problem.
What should I do? For any material modification the system has to modify every entry in MBEW? Is there any possibility to skip this?
Thank you.

Hi,
Symptom
Key word: Enqueue
FM: A system error has occurred in the block handler
Message in the syslog: lock table overflowed
Other terms
M3021 MM02 F5 288 F5288 FBRA
Reason and Prerequisites
The lock table has overflowed.
Cause 1: Dimensions of the lock table are too small
Cause 2: The update lags far behind or has shut down completely, so that the lock entries of the update requests that are not yet updated cause the lock table to overflow.
Cause 3: Poor design of the application programs. A lock is issued for each object in an application program, for example a collective run with many objects.
Solution
Determine the cause:
SM12 -> Goto -> Diagnosis (old)
SM12 -> Extras -> Diagnosis (new)
checks the effectiveness of the lock management
SM12 -> Goto -> Diagnosis in update (old)
SM12 -> Extras -> Diagnosis in update (new)
checks the effectiveness of the lock management in conjunction with updates
SM12 -> OkCode TEST -> Error handling -> Statistics (old, only in the enqueue server)
SM12 -> Extras -> Statistics (new)
shows the statistics of the lock management, including the previous maximum fill levels (peak usage) of the partial tables in the lock table
If the owner table overflows, cause 2 generally applies.
In the alert monitor (RZ20), an overrunning of the (customizable) high-water marks is detected and displayed as an alert reason.
The size of the lock table can be set with the profile parameter u201Cenque/table_size =u201C. specifies the size of the lock table in kilobytes. The setting must be made in the profile of the enqueue server ( u2026_DVEBM.. ). The change only takes effect after the restart of the enqueue server.
The default size is 500 KB in the Rel 3.1x implementation of the enqueue table. The resulting sizes for the individual tables are:
Owner table: approx 560.
Name table: approx 560.
Entry table: approx 2240.
As of Rel 4.xx the new implementation of the lock table takes effect.
It can also be activated as described in note 75144 for the 3.1I kernel. The default size is 2000 KB. The resulting sizes for the individual tables are:
Owner table: approx 5400
Name table: approx 5400
Entry table: approx 5400
Example: with the
u201Cenque/table_size =32000u2033 profile parameter, the size of the enqueue table is set to 32000 KB. The tables can then have approx 40,000 entries.
Note that the above sizes and numbers depend on various factors such as the kernel release, patch number, platform, address length (32/64-bit), and character width (Ascii/Unicode). Use the statistics display in SM12 to check the actual capacity of the lock table.
If cause 2 applies, an enlargement of the lock table only delays the overflow of the lock table, but it cannot generally be avoided.
In this case you need to eliminate the update shutdown or accelerate the throughput of the update program using more update processes. Using CCMS (operation modes, see training BC120) the category of work processes can be switched at runtime, for example an interactive work process can be converted temporarily into an update process, to temporarily increase the throughput of the update.
For cause 3, you should consider a tuning of the task function. Instead of issuing a large number of individual locks, it may be better to use generic locks (wildcard) to block a complete subarea. This will also allow you to considerably improve the performance.

Split valuation for material with two different price indicator S and V

Hello Gurus,
Is it possible to maintain split valuation for same material with two different price indicator S and V.
For Ex. Material A is manufactured can be manufactured in house , procured from outside vendor and can be purchased from subcontracting vendor by providing raw material.
We want to keep Price control V for same material " A" which is procured from outside vendor.
And price control S for inhouse produced same material " A".
Besically this material is semifinished and having BOM for subcontracting.
Please advice.

Hi
When the material is split valuated, you maintain the accounting view for the material 1st with valuation category, here the price control should be V.
When you will extend the material to valuation type "Inhouse mfgd" maintain the price control as S, for valuation type "Procured form outside vendor" maintain it as V.
Regards
Prasad

Split Valuation: changing price

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for