Splitting file without BPM

Hi,
I have an input file shown below.
US16DCUSAJ05061UC010007042
US16DCUSAY90011UB010007057
US16     USB490011UC010007059
US16DCUSAJ06061UC010007068
US16HQUSAY90011UB010007099
We have to split the fixed length file based on the field from 7th to 10th character of each line (ie USAJ,USAY,USB4) and place them in separate folders.
These characters are dynamic.
We do not want to use BPM.
Can anyone please suggest an alternative way to split accordingly.
thanks
Pratichi

hi,
there are two ways you can try:
1. Multi-Mapping without BPM - Yes, itu2019s possible!
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
2. you can create an adapter module that will do the split on any conditions and then
use standard conditions in directory to show to which folder the file needs to go
(sap does not recommend message splitting on adapter module but it's possible and works if done correctly)
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

Similar Messages

  • File-RFC-File (without BPM)- Issue

    Hi All,
    I am working on a File-RFC-File (without BPM) scenario in PI 7.1.
    My scenario is having few problems like, its not able to delete the file from the source directory path (for which we have delete permissions) and it is an NFS system and it shows an error in the Sender file CC.
    "Error: com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.impl.exception.CPAObjectKeyException: Value of key must not be null: ObjectId"
    But it gets processed successfully and provides a written paramter which I could see in MONI, but again doesn't write the file in the target directory. Could you please provide your inputs and let me know if I need to do any additional settings w.r.to PI7.1.
    These are the parameters which I have specified in the Sender File adapter
    Processing sequence
    AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean     Local Enterprise Bean     1
    CallSapAdapter     Local Enterprise Bean     2
    AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean Local Enterprise Bean     3
    Module configuration:
    1     PassThrough     true
    3     receiverChannel     <FilereceiverCCname>
    3     receiverService     <Receiver Bus System>
    Regards,
    Nithiyanandam

    Hello,
    Check out in module configuration tab for any "type error" or spell mistakes.
    Check out this thread which might be useful for you :[ File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.|File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.]
    regards
    Ramesh

  • Help needed in splitting files using BPM

    Hello experts,
    I am working on an interface where i need to split files within BPM.
    I know,i can achieve it in Message Mapping by mapping Recordset to Target structure and then using Interface Mapping within Transformation step.But i dont want to follow this.Is there an alternative way to achieve this within BPM.
    I have an input file with multiple headers and i need to split for each header.My input file looks like this:
    HXXXXXABCDVN01
    MXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    MXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    SXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    HXXXXXABCDVN02
    MXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    MXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    SXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    HXXXXXABCDVN03
    MXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    SXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    Is there a way, where i can specify this condition within BPM , that split files for every H.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Swathi

    Hi,
    have your target structure with occurence as 0...unbounded in the mapping and map the header filed to the root node (repeating parent node) of the target structure....this will create as many target messages as the header fileds....if you want to send these messages separately then use a block in BPM with ForEach option....
    Splitting and Dynamic configuration can be applied in the same mapping.
    Regards,
    Abhishek.
    Edited by: abhishek salvi on Dec 18, 2008 12:59 PM

  • File - RFC - File without BPM  ---  Object not found in ResponseOneWayBean

    I am using PI 7.1, and facing the following error in File - RFC - File without BPM
    "Error: com.sap.engine.services.jndi.persistent.exceptions.NameNotFoundException: Object not found in lookup of ResponseOneWayBean."
    I am using 1 sender CC for File ( CC_LOTUSNOTES_CHALET_SND)
                      1 receiver CC for File( CC_LOTUSNOTES_CHALET_RCV_FILE)
                     1 receiver CC for RFC (CC_LOTUSNOTES_CHALET_RCV_RFC)
    in the sender CC I have given Module parameter as:
    Processing sequene
    CallSapAdapter    Local Enterprise Bean 2
    AF_Modules/ResponseOneWayBean  Local Enterprise Bean 3
    AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean  Local Enterprise Bean 1
    Module configuration:
    1     passThrough          true
    3    receiverChannel      CC_LOTUSNOTES_CHALET_RCV_FILE
    3    receiverService       Bus_File
    pls let me know where i am wrong

    Hi
    i am facing following error:
    2009-12-03 09:08:17       Information        The application sent the message asynchronously using connection File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System. Returning to application.
    2009-12-03 09:08:17       Information       MP: processing local module localejbs/AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean
    2009-12-03 09:08:17      Error                 MP: exception caught with cause java.lang.NullPointerException
    2009-12-03 09:08:17      Error                 File processing failed with java.lang.NullPointerException

  • Error in File-RFC-File Without BPM

    Hi,
    We are following this wiki
    [https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/xi/file-rfc-file(Without+BPM)]
    and we are getting Error: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: Received HTTP response code 500 : Internal Server Error in sender communication channel monitoring. File is not picking. I think problem with the parameters that we have mentioned in module tab in sender communication channel as specified in the wiki. If we remove additional 2  parameters it is picking the file.
    Please help me to resolve this issue.
    Thanks.
    Jyothi Anagani.

    are you able to see the logs of file adapter?
    go to messaging system and check the details
    http://host:port/MessagingSystem/monitor/monitor.jsp
    Rajesh

  • File is not getting deleted in File-RFC-File without BPM

    Hi,
    I'm working on File-RFC-File scenario without BPM. Everything is working fine except file is not getting deleted after the process. I'm passing xml file here and in return it will give the xml success/error message from RFC.
    For the sender CC, I'm passing the following parameters,
    Transsport protocol: File system
    Message protocol: File
    QoS: BE
    Poll Interval: 30 sec
    Mode: Delete
    File type: Binay
    Please let me know if I missed anything while passing the values.
    Thanks,
    Swamy
    Edited by: Swamy Mothe on Jun 15, 2009 8:52 AM

    Hi
    Then , is Sender and receiver File Adapter is using same folder )
    Just a question.
    But having all permisions and above config would delete the file
    can u see the status of u r File Adapter in RWB.? Is it in green?
    rgds
    srini

  • SOAP to RFC synchronous scenario with File without BPM

    Hi Folks,
    I have a requirement that has to be done with out BPM!!!
    Requirement:
    Soap will trigger the request to SAP(RFC) and SAP sends the response to a file and then after SOAP has to recieve the ACK from PI.
    1) Can we do this by without using BPM
    2)Can we use without BPM module entries for SOAP Sender
    Please suggest and help me out in this
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards
    vivek

    Hi Vivek,
      Why not have the SOAP interface defined as synchronous?
    You can avoid using BPM that way.
    Best Regards,
    Ravi

  • Message Splitting issue (without bpm)

    Hi Experts,
    I was currently trying to create a message split (1 message --> 2 output) using BPM like in this blog: Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure
    Then i noticed that it was also possible to achieve this without using BPM (creating a interface mapping with 2 outputs, and using the interface determination with the extended option) like on this one:
    Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure
    (but using the structure showed in the first blog since i was just testing)
    The issue i have is that even when it worked, and i see all good in the XML monitoring (SMXB_MONI) the both resulting files appear only with  one field, and i can't see the others
    Example from the XML monitoring:
    ORIGINAL FILE: (I split based on the id 1 and 2)
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
    - <ns:bpm_in_MT xmlns:ns="http://bpm.com/splitting">
    - <record>
    - <details>
      <name>Jorge</name>
      <id>1</id>
      </details>
    - <details>
      <name>Fernando</name>
      <id>2</id>
      </details>
      </record>
      </ns:bpm_in_MT>
    RESULT FILE 1:
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
    - <ns1:bpm_out_MT xmlns:ns1="http://bpm.com/splitting">
    - <record>
    - <info>
      <name>Jorge</name>
      <id>1</id>
      </info>
      </record>
      </ns1:bpm_out_MT>
    RESULT FILE 2:
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
    - <ns1:bpm_out1_MT xmlns:ns1="http://bpm.com/splitting">
    - <record>
    - <info>
      <name>Fernando</name>
      <id>2</id>
      <age>20</age>
      </info>
      </record>
      </ns1:bpm_out1_MT>
    HERE's the ISSUE:
    Files in the FTP folder:
    file1.txt with only "Jorge        "
    file2.txt with only "Fernando  "
    when the first file should have 2 fields (id is included), and the second one should be name (id and age included)
    Could this be a parsing issue? i'm confused since i see no errors in the channels
    I'm using 2 FTP receivers channels with Content conversion
    CC_FTP_first_file_receiver:
    Recordset: info
    info.fieldNames                  name,id
    info.fieldFixedLengths         15,1
    info.keyFieldValue              1
    info.endSeparator               'nl'
    info.processFieldNames      fromConfiguration
    CC_FTP_second_file_receiver:
    Recordset: info
    info.fieldNames                  name,id,age
    info.fieldFixedLengths         15,1,2
    info.keyFieldValue              2
    info.endSeparator               'nl'
    info.processFieldNames      fromConfiguration
    I may have no use for the keyfieldvalue since i'm only saving that file in FTP, but i already removed that and it didn't change much, i still get 2 files, but only with the "name" tag on them
    Any ideas??
    i'm sure i'm missing something basic, but i'm don't have much experience on XML
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    This is really intersting as well as unexpected result...if you used directly the XML format then 2 fiels are created with appropriate data with all fields....
    And if you used the FCC then , fields are missing...so one thing is clear that as you have already said..issue is with FCC only...
    Have you tried to process only single file with FCC instead of  2 files at a time.
    Also if possible try out with fieldSeperator parameter instead of FixedFieldLenghts...see whats the result...
    I hope this will give you the hint...
    Thanks
    swarup

  • Mergeing files of same structure to one file without BPM

    Hi XI Gurus,
                    I want to merge various xml files having same structures(coming as separate files in source directory) to a one file. I want to do it without using BPM.I need this Final structure as an  input to another scenario to post an idoc.
    e.g -->
    <i>File1</i>:
    <AR_Posting>
         <currency_line_item>1<currency_line_item>
         <tax_line_item>2<tax_line_item>
          <customer_line_item>3<customer_line_item>
    <AR_Posting>
    <i>File 2</i>:
    <AR_Posting>
         <currency_line_item>11<currency_line_item>
         <tax_line_item>22<tax_line_item>
          <customer_line_item>33<customer_line_item>
    <AR_Posting>
    <i>File 3</i> :
    <AR_Posting>
         <currency_line_item>111<currency_line_item>
         <tax_line_item>222<tax_line_item>
          <customer_line_item>333<customer_line_item>
    <AR_Posting>
    Target:
    <Recordset>
          <AR_Posting>
             <currency_line_item>1<currency_line_item>
             <tax_line_item>2<tax_line_item>
             <customer_line_item>3<customer_line_item>
         <AR_Posting>
           <AR_Posting>
               <currency_line_item>11<currency_line_item>
               <tax_line_item>22<tax_line_item>
               <customer_line_item>33<customer_line_item>
          <AR_Posting>
          <AR_Posting>
              <currency_line_item>111<currency_line_item>
              <tax_line_item>222<tax_line_item>
              <customer_line_item>333<customer_line_item>
         <AR_Posting>
    <Recordset>
    Please suggest any solution to achieve this.

    Hi Anurag,,
    I guess what Sumit is aiming for, is that if you don't want to use a BPM you will need a two step solution.
    Step one:
    If the different files have the same structure, read them with a sending file adapter and route the to an receiving file adapter which appends all messages to a new combined file.
    Step two:
    Read the new combined file with a sending file adapter and route the messages to your target interface.
    This approach of-course means that you can not do any correlations as you can in BPM. I.e. you will not "know" when all three files have arrived but just simply read the combined files at certain times and pick-up whatever content it holds.
    rgds Johan

  • Posting idocs in sequence in SAP from file (without BPM)

    Hi,
    I have a requirement of posting the TWO idocs from the single file. But I need to send the idocs in sequence. Can you anyone explain the process  how we can ecomplish from XI without using BPM.

    Hi,
    you can ONLY do that if your <b>ERP,R3 (IDOC receiver system) system
    is based on WAS 6.40</b>
    the whole scenario is described step by step in my book:
    <a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2006/10/11/xi-new-book-mastering-idoc-business-scenarios-with-sap-xi"><b>Mastering IDoc Business Scenarios with SAP XI</b></a>
    Regards,
    michal
    <a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>

  • IDoc - Web service - File without BPM

    Hi all,
    I have asked some days ago how to do an asynch -> synch -> asynch scenario in XI without using BPM.
    The solution with RequestResponseBean and ResponseOnewayBean modules in the File sender communication channel works fine.
    But now I would ask you how can I do if my sender is R/3, with IDocs?
    Because we cannot use modules in the IDoc sender communication channel, and I don't want to use BPM.
    Someone has an idea?
    Thanks in advance,
    Gregory

    Hi,
    May be you can try a work around.
    1. IDOC > XI-> SOAP Asynch Scenario(Scenario 2 exposed as Webservice from XI).
    2.  SOAP>XI->External Webservice>File
    In  second case you can use Modules.
    I have not tried.Check if the solution would suit your needs.
    Regards,
    Sudharshan N A
    Edited by: Sudharshan Aravamudan on Feb 1, 2008 5:31 PM

  • Request Message mapping in SXMB_MONI for File - RFC - File without BPM

    Hi ,
    In my File-RFC-File scenario, the messages are processed successfully.
    but when i look into the SXMB_MONI for File to RFC step, the records are present only till the  Message split According to Receiver List and not able to see the records from Request Message mapping step onwards.it contains
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
      <ns1:Z_PI_LOTUSNOTES_UNIFORM xmlns:ns1="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions" />
    in my mapping for the receiver RFC i have not done the mapping for all the fields. few fields i have disabled. whether this could create a problem in message mapping. pls let me know what needs to be done.

    Is it only for this scenario that the above display issue is occuring or is it for all scenarios?
    If onlt a particular Pipeline steps are displayed then you can check what is the TRACE level set in SXMB_ADM --> Integration Engine Configuration --> and check if the TRACE parameter is set to at least 2 (max is 3 which will ensure that your DB will get full quickly)
    For more information refer: /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/05/10/xi-i-cannot-see-some-of-my-messages-in-the-sxmbmoni
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • Split Response without BPM

    Hi,
    i have a synchronous scenario:
    SAP (ABAP proxy) <-> 3rd Party (http)
    Is it possible to send in addtion to the (synchronous) proxy response some IDocs without use of BPM?
    synchr proxy request .................-> http service
    synchr proxy response...............<-
    IDoc A......................................<-
    IDoc B......................................<-
    Regards,
    Udo

    Hello,
    This is possible but with specific workarounds. The first one is already suggested by Rodrigo. The second one is to create a function module in R/3 that will trigger the IDOCs and then call that FM using RFCAccessor using the HTTP Response in message mapping.
    Although one of the downsides of this approach is transparency e.g not visible in monitoring unless you look at the code for the fm call.
    Hope this helps,
    Mark

  • Multiple Idoc to file without BPM

    Hi All,
    I am using xml [HTTP destination|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/30ea2fdf-f047-2a10-d3a2-955a634bde6b ] in ECC system to collect Idocs(say 100,200 etc) of particular type (say MATMAS05) and sending it as a single message with multiple Idoc noes for same message type to PI 7.1 system, In PI I need to create the single node for each IDoc on target side based on certain validations on the fields of various segments( with unbounded occurences ) occuring at various levels . Node should be created only if all the fields are validated,even if a single field fails validation node for that IDoc should not be created on target side.
    for example:
    >>MATMAS
      >>|_E1MARAM
         >> |_ MATNR
         >>| _E1MAKTM
           >>   |_MAKTX
    If there are 100 MATMAS nodes in the message and if MAKTX field of third E1MAKTM segment in 97 th IDOC node fails validation the node for this IDOC node should not be created on the target side..
    Currently I am trying to do it using UDF but due to performance point of view I do not want to execute Loop across various segments twice, once to validate the fields and second time to generate node.
    Can anybody help me in this ?
    Thanks,
    Amit

    Hi Mughda,
    How would i validate using createif node function as i also need to validate fields of all the segments of the same Idoc. ?
    Thanks,
    Amit

  • Message Split without BPM - Error

    Hi,
    I am creating a message split scenario without BPM as per weblog <a href="/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible Split without BPM</a>
    I am able to receive message in XI but after that it shows error in Integration engine.
    Error Category : MAPPING
    Error Code : GENERIC
    I am able to see the message in SXMB_MONI with error
    <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="MAPPING">GENERIC</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>No messages created from split mapping</SAP:P1>
    Please advice.
    Thanks,
    Sri.

    Hi Venkat,
    I am not able to see sub-groupid in sxmb_moni.
    Please see below the contents from sxmb_moni trace.
    ============================
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Request Message Mapping
      -->
    - <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: sender</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender scheme external = XIParty</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender agency external = http://sap.com/xi/XI</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party normalized =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: receiver</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver scheme external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver agency external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party normalized =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_HTTP_HANDLER-HANDLE_REQUEST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/xi/engine?type=entry</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is done by XMB !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = 67F58830CE9E11DA91CD00111120E6DB</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0002</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0002</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTO6___0000</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Object-Id:29EB87F0231C357A8336DDEBD574EEAB</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:0CF1E1E0C5FC11DABCB9E4A50A07012B</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Step:1</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:JAVA</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_filesplit_without_bpm_</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
      <Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      </SAP:Trace>
    Thanks,
    Sri.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Why does daisy-chaining a Mini-DisplayPort monitor in a Thunderbolt chain cause overscan issues?

    I have the awkward 2011 MacBook Pro with a single Thunderbolt port and no USB3.  I very frequently use it connected to my HP 2311x LED Monitor.  For the very first time, today I placed a external Thunderbolt drive in-between my MacBook Pro and the HP

  • Using a CMap with a non-embedded font

    I would like to (for example) use MS Arial without embedding it. I can do this just fine if I use the Arial internal CIDs with /Encoding /Identity-H, but that is not what I want to do - I want to use /Encoding 123 0 R to refer to a CMap so that I can

  • CS2- CS3 Observer questions.

    Hello. Im porting a plugin from CS2 to CS3 on MAC and have run into a problem with the observer structure. In the CS2 plugin we simply used the default values available, IID_IUNKOWN & IID_IOBSERVER... i IsAttached (IObserver *observer, const PMIID &i

  • Most efficient way to pack U16 -- U32 Array for Data DMA Transfer?

    I have an RT controller that wants to send down data to an FPGA using DMA.  In LabVIEW 8.2, I have no choice but to pass down U32 blocks of data however my my input data is a U16 array.  This leaves me two choices:  1) Wire the U16 Array directly to

  • PO Create Workflow

    Hello, i have created release statargy for PO and in that assigned all role for release of PO. Now i have to send a mail in approver SAP mailbox for approve or Reject PO i m not finding out any workflow that can help me or no event is there named "CR