Spool List from MRP RUN

hi,
After i run MRP for a Plant , in the spool list i get a list of materials for which MRP has run.
There is another coulmn with heading Selection group, under which nos 1 to 8 are listed.
against each material some nos are displayed.
I am attaching the screenshot of the spool list.
Please refer to Link: [http://picasaweb.google.com/lyrojgeorge/Public#5315125239632521186]
Can someone explain what these nos relate to.
thanks in advance
regards
lyroj

Hi,
The details are the exception messages against the Materials.
Check in MD05 & MD06.
Best Regards,
Siva

Similar Messages

  • Excluding storage location from MRP run in Long Term Planning

    Hi,friends,
         In my scenario , i want to exclude storage location from MRP run in long term planning.When i set storage location MRP indicator "2" in SPRO and SLoc MRP indicator "1" MRP4 in material master, i can exclude the storage location after run MRP with MD01/MD02,and i can see the expected result in MD04.But in Long Term Planning scenario the storage location can not be excluded after run MRP with MS01/MS02,and the requirements list in MS04 include the stock in the storage location i want to exclude. i dont know if i miss something.Plz give me some advice.
    Regards
    Joey

    Hi,
    Refer the OSS Note 208017 - LTP: Long-term planning and storage locations
    ==========================================================================
    Symptom
    In long-term planning (Transactions MSBT / MS01 / MS02 / MS03), the MRP indicator of a storage location for a material is not taken into account (material master, view MRP 2 [up to and including Release 3.1I] or MRP 4 [as of Release 4.0A]).
    The storage locations excluded by MRP or planned separately are also planned in the plant segment.
    Additional key words
    LTP, MM01, MM02, MM03, master data, MRP indicator, LGORT ...
    Cause and prerequisites
    The MRP indicator for a certain storage location of a material is only taken into account in operative planning (requirements planning, MRP).
    The long-term planning occurs exclusively at plant level.
    Solution
    This is no error. The system works as intended.
    The individual storage locations should not be distinguished in the long-term planning, in order to perform a comprehensive long-term planning.
    This is important, for example, within the kanban processing where the storage locations with kanban MRP are excluded from the MRP, but in spite of that should be included in the long-term planning.
    ==========================================================================
    Regards,
    Siva

  • How to exempt a storage location from MRP run

    Hi all,
    How do I exempt a storage location and all its materials from MRP run.
    I am creating a new storage location and this should not be considered for MRP and  no idoc should be generated if a purchase order or a delivery is created from this storage location( should we stop entering this storage location in BD64 filters or anything more to prevent triggering of the idoc).
    Can somebody please through some light on these issues. 
    Kind Regards
    Chakradhar
    <REMOVED>

    Hi
    You need to set up master data for that material.In Mrp-4 View  set  storage location indicator as 1(one) .In this case your storage location stock will be exclude from MRP .
    Hope this will help
    Dilip

  • MRP-Exclude STO document type from MRP Run

    Hi,
    I want to exclude STO document type from MRP run, so that STO Open qty will not be considered as open qty while  doing MRP.
    I have checked below settings but didn't worked.
    1. In OMI8 - I have unchecked "Stock in Transfer"
    2. SPRO->Materials Management->Consumption-based Planning->Planning->Define torage Location MRP per plant
         Here I have excluded ONE storage location from MRP and same storage location has been used in the STO.
    Can anyone know how to resolve this ?
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    Rakesh,
    Yes, they will not be relevant for MRP.  Neither will anything else in that storage location.  However, the setting is not in configuration, but in the material master (MRP4 tab).
    The configuration setting you mentioned has no impact on existing material masters, it is only used to determine the default settings for newly created storage location entries for a material/plant..
    You can set a particular material/plant/stlocn to be irrelevant for MRP.  This relevancy is irrespective of document type, it can be a STO, a purchase req, a sales order,  a production order, or it could be stock (inventory)  - all supply and demand in this material/plant/stlocn are excluded from MRP processing.
    MRP relevancy of storage location is set at the material/plant/storage location level in the material master.
    If you do not wish to exclude a storage location from MRP, then you will have to find another way to make your STOs Irrelevant for MRP.  As I said earlier, STOs (like any other Purchase orders that are configured to process stock ), are generally considered to be relevant for MRP.    
    If you were a client, I would suggest that you rethink your business model that drives this requirement.   
    If the business model cannot be altered, and the storage location solution is unacceptable, then you will be stuck with a customized solution.
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Storage location to be excluded from MRP Run

    Dear Gurus ,
    We are trying to exclude perticular Storage location from MRP Run with the Configuration setting
    IMG >>> Production >>>.MRP >>>.Planning >>>>.Define Storage Location  MRP per plant >>>> Indicator 1 is set
    Still the Stock is being considered
    As I know this can be done thr' MRP4 view , but we don't want to go Part No wise ,
    Suggest better sloution
    Thanx in advance

    Vasu,
    Above IMG path is only used  for defulting the storage location exclusion in material master.
    Whenever  materials are extended to this storage nlocation in mm01 or mmsc, this defult value would be proposed automatically .
    However this does not mean setting it in IMG would change existing materia storage location extensions automatically. Also MRP will not pick from above IMG settings.
    Once again above setting is only valid from defulting the values while extending the Materials to storage locations.
    Hope it helps.

  • Exclusion of Stock Transport specific MRP Elements from MRP Run

    Hi,
    How can we exclude specific MRP Elements from planning?
    I want to exclude the MRP elements like - Ord.DS, PRqRel, PlORel etc from MRP run.
    (After MRP run, they should only be displayed in MD04 and not planned)
    MRP run should treat all other MRP elements normally.
    Warm Regards,
    Madhavi.

    I think I understand what you want to do, and I think it is not possible without some major MODIFICATIONS, because it goes against the grain of what MRP is supposed to do: balance demand and supply.
    One thing you might consider as a possible work-around: create a "virtual plant" say 5000, that is a plant that isn't really used for anything. Then point your special procurement keys in plant 2000 to plant 5000. This is where you then get the purchase req releases etc, and they will not affect plant 1000.
    This doesn't require modifications... but it will also not display the elements in MD04 for plant 1000.
    Just an idea...

  • Elaborate in MDBT and open scheduling agreement list through MRP Run

    Hi experts,
    After MRP Run in MD02 i had find out the list of Purchase requisition at ME5A , based on the purchase requisition no i will create scheduling agreement  not for PO, so how it is possible for the list of open scheduling agreement list  through MRP Run Only?
    Kindly elaborate the screen short steps at MDBT - MRP Run in background process what are possibilities >  weekly once or daily basis, report run repeated purchase requisition  no or not , update the daily stock status all those things ?
           what are the possibles in MDBT MRP Run > Maintain conditions,type of generate reports, open reports through t.code and report converted   excel or through mail recording MRP  run?
    Thanks,
    Umapathy

    Hi,
    In MDBT we can create the variant and Schedule as you wish  and execute .and also you can have the status of the schedule whether it is in cancelled or finished .
    Reg
    MSP

  • Number Range for PR converted from MRP Run

    Dear Experts,
    We are experiencing problems with our number range when converting our MRP generated planned orders into PRs. We convert planned orders to purchase requisitions using MD03. We have 1 Plant with 2 MRP Groups which assigned to specific document types and number ranges as well. For example:
    In T-code OMI8:
    Plant AAAA --> Number Range 1111111111
    (Because 1 Plant only able to have 1 number ranges)
    In T-code OPPZ:
    Plant AAAA, MRP Group : A01--> PR Document Type : ZZZZ
    Plant AAAA, MRP Group : A02 --> PR Document Type : XXXX
    In T-code SPRO "PR Document Types" and "PR Document Ranges"
    PR Document Type : ZZZZ --> Number Ranges 1111111111
    PR Document Type : XXXX --> Number Ranges 2222222222
    When I run MD03, the result is:
    MRP Group : A01 --> PR Document Type : ZZZZ --> Number Ranges : 1111111111
    MRP Group : A02 --> PR Document Type : XXXX --> Number Ranges : 1111111111 (Why the number ranges is not 2222222222 ???????)
    Does anyone have idea? Please help. Thanks a lot..

    Hi Mallinath,
    thanks for your info.
    Note 46919 has been implemented in the system, and also i have maintain Tcode - OMI3:
    * Object Type : 2 (PR) --> PR Document Type : ZZZZ --> Internal number range : 1111111111 --> external number range : " " (blank) --> Reservations : 01
    * Object Type : 2 (PR) --> PR Document Type : XXXX--> Internal number range : 2222222222 --> external number range : " " (blank) --> Reservations : 01
    But still system pick wrong number ranges (1111111111, instead of 2222222222 ) for PR Document Type XXXX if generated from MRP run.
    Do you have any other idea? Thank you.

  • How to exclude the manually create SAP PO from MRP Run?

    Dear all
    There is this situation that due to the long procurement lead time, certain PO is created manually in SAP in advance based on the sales order enquiry made by customer. (In normal case, we will create a sales order in SAP and then run MRP to create PR to converted to PO)
    Most of the time, customer will confirm their enquiry so that we can create sales Order in SAP and this will make it just in time for our raw material to arrive. However, when the PO is created in advance without triggered by MRP caused by Sales Order, this PO booked quantity is often taken up by the consideration of MRP RUN by other sales order. And if later customer confirms their enquiry and there is no PO stock for this due to this stock is already considered by other sales order.
    Is there a way that I can exclude the manually create SAP PO from MRP Run?
    Please advise.

    Dear Csaba Szommer
    Thanks for your reply.
    Sorry for confusing you.
    1. We are in a MAKE TO ORDER (MTO) environment.
    2. There is this situation that due to the long procurement lead time, certain PO is created manually in SAP in advance based on
        the sales order enquiry made by customer. (In normal case, we will create a sales order in SAP and then run MRP to create
        PR to converted to PO).
    3. Most of the time, customer ABCwill confirm their enquiry so that we can create sales Order in SAP and this will make it just in
        time for our raw material to arrive.
    4. However, for the PO that is created in advance (not created by PR  triggered by MRP caused by Sales Order), this PO 
        On Order Quantity is often taken up by the consideration of MRP RUN by other sales orders.
    5. It creates problem that if later this customer ABC confirms his enquiry and we create SAP Sales Order in the system, the
        stock of PO created previously is already  eaten up by other sales orders.
    We are using MTO and do not use Forecast. And MTO Strategy is set at the material master level and as such I do not think we can simply modify the MRP Strategy to suit this unique case, as for the very same material, in one PO it should be considered by MRP but in another PO, it should be excluded from MRP Run.
    Is there a way that I can exclude the manually create SAP PO (for the case of Customer ABC email enquiry without creating Sales Order in the System first) from MRP Run?

  • Excluding PO from MRP Run

    Dear All,
                  I have one requirement that i want to exclude one PO document type( Developements PO) From MRP Run. How can i do this.
    Kindly Help
    Regards
    Sunil

    Hi,
           My scenario is that when a new vendor is developed for Procurement of a existing material then at first Developement Purchase Order is raised against that vendor. After finalisation of vendor standard PO is raised against that vendor. For a material which is being Procured from some vendor there will be Regular Purchase Order, now i need  more vendor for that Material then I will raise Developement PO against those vendor, then on Finalisation of vendor i will start raising regular PO for that vendor. In MRP run this Developement PO quantity should not be considered as receipt element
    Regards
    Sunil

  • Error - You may display spool list from your own jobs..

    Hi Team,
    I have created a SAP_ALL Display role for our maintainence members and whenever they are trying to view the spool log in sm37 they are getting the Error - You may display spool list from your own jobs..
    I have checked the following objects :S_SPO_ACT and S_SPO_DEV all those have full authorizations and regenerated and done a user compare and then checked ..getting the same error..
    Could you pls provide your vauable suggestions..
    Regds,
    Satyanarayana N.

    Hello Satya,
    Normal users hardly need access to s_btch_adm with value *. I wonder if your security auditors would agree to it.
    Also 3 is not a valid value for s_btch_adm. Either it can be Yor N. Y mean that the user is batch administrator while N means the user is not. Of course * encompasses all. Try first with N and see if the users are able to see the spool.
    If not then do you have mutiple clients in your system? If so make sure users are trying to see the spool in the correct client i.e they are trying to check a spool generated in client X after logging into client X only.
    Regards.
    Ruchit.

  • Differentiation between PRs' Coming from MRP Run & Reservations

    Hi,
    How can we differntiate that a PR is coming from MRP Run (If quantity falles below ROP) and Reservation (If Max is 2 and reserved is 4)
    Appreciate your responses
    Regards,
    Talha

    Hi,
       I didnt get the second part of the question...could you please elaborate.
       The PR creation indicator will be in PR - item level - contact person tab as shown below.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Storage location exclusion from MRP run

    Dear Experts,
    please how do i exclude a particular storage location from being considered in MRP Run? and from which table(s) can I get the list of open production orders

    Dear Vincent,
    in OMIR you can exclude particular storage location. input values as 1
    MRP - 4 view For storage location option input value as 1
    in MMSC - same input value as 1
    For your scond query what exactly you mean be open Prd orders
    You can get all details in COOIS by inputting system status
    Regards
    Madhu

  • How To Send Multiple Spool Lists  from a Single Step in SM37

    We have converted all of our output reports to ALV and now instead of one big spool that contains all the reports generated in a single step we now have multiple spools.  We run the program as a Batch Job in SM37 and have created an entry in the SPOOL LIST RECIPIENT for the job.  The problem is that it only sends one of our lists.  Is there a way to make it send all of the ists?

    You need to write areport program with fm 'RSPO_RETURN_ABAP_SPOOLJOB'  and collect all spools and send it and make this as precedent job after your ALV spool jobs
    a®

  • Time stamp in MRP list after MRP Run

    Hi Gurus
    After running a MD01-MRP at scope of planning level, with processing key as NETCH, materials which had no planning file entry also were updated with the latest executed MRP run time stamp in MRP List MD05.
    Is it the standard behaviour? As per my understanding, the materials with no planning file relevant change is not included in the MRP run with processing key NETCH/NETPL. Then how does the time stamp be relevant for the latest MRP run while the material was never included in the mrp itself?
    Regards
    Deepak Prasanna S

    Dear Deepak,
    If my understanding is correct only if a mterial is included in the last MRP run(MD01/MDBT) then the time stamp gets included in the
    MRP list which can be checked and confirmed through MD05 and also the output of last MRP run.
    Once after the MRP run is completed the system deletes the corresponding planning file entries in the system.
    On completion of the planning run, the appropriate indicator is automatically deleted in the planning file:
    The system deletes the net change planning indicator and the net change planning horizon indicator for a regenerative planning
    run and a net change planning run.
    The system only deletes the net change planning horizon indicator for a net change planning run in the planning horizon.
    Check and revert back.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

Maybe you are looking for